Guidance Under Section 267(f); Deferral of Loss on Transactions Between Members of a Controlled Group, 22480-22483 [2012-9004]
Download as PDF
22480
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
final regulations apply to multiple-party
financing arrangements that are effected
through disregarded entities, and are
necessary in order to determine which
of those arrangements should be
recharacterized as a conduit financing
arrangement.
DATES: This correction is effective on
April 16, 2012 and is applicable on
December 9, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Quyen P. Huynh, (202) 622–3880 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2012–8967 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9562]
RIN 1545–BH77
Conduit Financing Arrangements;
Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
This document contains a
correction to final regulations (TD 9562)
that were published in the Federal
Register on Friday, December 9, 2011
(76 FR 76895) providing guidance on
conduit financing arrangements. The
SUMMARY:
Background
The final regulation (TD 9562) that is
the subject of this correction is under
section 881 of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Need for Correction
As published, TD 9562 contains errors
that may prove to be misleading and is
in need of clarification.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
§ 1.881–3
[Amended]
Par. 2. For each entry in the table in
the ‘‘Section’’ column, remove the
language in the ‘‘Remove’’ column and
add in its place the language in the
‘‘Add’’ column as set forth below:
■
Section
Remove
Last sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(i)(A) .........................................................................
Last sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B) .........................................................................
Last sentence of paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(E)(2)(ii) ...............................................................
Last sentence of paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(B) ........................................................................
Last sentence of paragraph (b)(1) .................................................................................
Last sentence of paragraph (b)(2)(i) .............................................................................
Last sentence of paragraph (b)(2)(iii) ............................................................................
Last sentence of paragraph (b)(2)(iv) ............................................................................
Last sentence of paragraph (b)(3)(i) .............................................................................
Last sentence of paragraph (d)(1)(i) .............................................................................
Next to last sentence of paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(A) ............................................................
Paragraph (e), Example 21, paragraph (i) ....................................................................
Paragraph (e), Example 21, paragraph (ii) ...................................................................
Paragraph (e), Example 23, paragraph (i) ....................................................................
Paragraph (e), Example 24, paragraph (i) ....................................................................
Examples 1, 2, 3 ................
Examples 4 and 5 ..............
Example 6 ..........................
Examples 7 and 8 ..............
Examples 11 and 12 ..........
Examples 13, 14 and 15 ....
Example 16 ........................
Example 17 ........................
Examples 21, 22 and 23 ....
Example 24 ........................
Example 25 ........................
Example 19 ........................
Example 20 ........................
Example 21 ........................
Example 21 ........................
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison, Publications and
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing
Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure
and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2012–8993 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9583]
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
RIN 1545–BI92
Guidance Under Section 267(f);
Deferral of Loss on Transactions
Between Members of a Controlled
Group
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:33 Apr 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
Final regulations.
This document contains final
regulations concerning the deferral of
losses on the sale or exchange of
property between members of a
controlled group and provides guidance
as to the time for taking into account
those losses. These regulations affect
corporations that are members of a
controlled group.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on April 16, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amie Colwell Breslow (202) 622–7530
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Section 267(a)(1) provides that no
deduction shall be allowed for any loss
on the sale or exchange of property
between certain related persons. Section
267(f)(2) contains an exception for a loss
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Add
Examples 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Examples 5 and 6.
Example 7.
Examples 8 and 9.
Examples 12 and 13.
Examples 14, 15 and 16.
Example 17.
Example 18.
Examples 22, 23 and 24.
Example 25.
Example 26.
Example 20.
Example 21.
Example 22.
Example 22.
on the sale or exchange of property
between members of a controlled group.
For this purpose, ‘‘controlled group’’
has the meaning given to such term in
section 1563(a) except that ‘‘more than
50 percent’’ is substituted for ‘‘at least
80 percent’’ each place it appears. In the
case of a sale or exchange of loss
property between members of a
controlled group, the loss is deferred
rather than disallowed. Under section
267(f)(2)(B), the loss is deferred until the
property is transferred outside of the
controlled group and there would be
recognition of loss under consolidated
return principles or until such other
time as may be prescribed in
regulations.
The regulations under section 267(f)
provide that the timing principles for
intercompany sales or exchanges
between members of a consolidated
group (see generally § 1.1502–13(c)(2))
apply to sales or exchanges of property
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
at a loss between members of a
controlled group. See § 1.267(f)–1(a)(2).
The attribute redetermination rules
applicable to transactions between
members of a consolidated group (see
§ 1.1502–13(c)(1)), however, do not
apply to sales or exchanges between
members of a controlled group.
Although the attribute
redetermination rule generally does not
apply to sales or exchanges between
members of a controlled group,
§ 1.267(f)–1(c)(1)(iv) contains a special
rule with respect to losses that would
have been redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount if the
consolidated return attribute
redetermination rule did apply. Under
§ 1.267(f)–1(c)(1)(iv), if an intercompany
loss between members of a consolidated
group would have been redetermined to
be a noncapital, nondeductible amount
as a result of the attribute
redetermination rule applicable to
consolidated groups, but is not
redetermined because the sale or
exchange occurred between members of
a controlled group (to which the
attribute redetermination rule does not
apply), then the loss will be deferred.
The loss is taken into account when the
selling member (S) and buying member
(B) are no longer in a controlled group
relationship.
On April 21, 2011, the IRS and
Treasury Department published a notice
of proposed rulemaking (REG–118761–
09) in the Federal Register (76 FR
22336). The notice included proposed
regulations under section 267(f)
providing guidance concerning the
Federal income tax treatment of
deferred losses on the sale or exchange
of property between members of a
controlled group, including transactions
in which the member acquiring the
property subsequently recognizes a
corresponding gain with respect to the
property. The proposed regulations
provided that certain losses on the sale
or exchange of property between
members of a controlled group, which
have been deferred, are taken into
account upon the occurrence of either of
two events. The deferred loss is taken
into account to the extent of any
corresponding gain that the member
acquiring the property recognizes with
respect to the property. Alternatively,
the deferred loss is taken into account
when the parties to the transaction cease
to be in a controlled group relationship.
The proposed regulations also provided
that for purposes of determining
whether the loss is redetermined to be
a noncapital, nondeductible amount
under the principles of § 1.1502–13,
stock held by S, stock held by B, and
stock held by all members of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:33 Apr 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
consolidated group that includes S, as
well as stock held by any member of a
controlled group of which S is a
member that was acquired from a
member of S’s consolidated group, must
be taken into account. A public hearing
was requested and held on August 3,
2011. The IRS received one formal
comment in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking. The comment
raised several questions with certain
recommendations, which are discussed
in the following paragraphs of this
preamble.
The commentator suggested that the
final regulations incorporate a model
that allows a loss to be taken into
account based on the arm’s length
principles contained in section 482 and
the regulations thereunder. Specifically,
the commentator noted that if the
transaction is arm’s length in nature and
has substance from a business
perspective, the loss should be taken
into account immediately. The IRS and
Treasury Department do not agree with
this comment. In a transaction described
in these regulations, it is assumed that
the parties are acting at arm’s length.
Section 267(f) serves a different
purpose, namely, to determine the
timing of when a loss should be taken
into account on a sale or exchange of
property between members of a
controlled group. Accordingly, the final
regulations retain the model contained
in the proposed regulations.
The commentator also suggested that
the proposed regulations do not clearly
state how to establish whether a
recognized loss is redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount
under the principles of § 1.1502–13.
Specifically, the commentator noted
that it is unclear whether the proposed
regulations, as written, are intended to
direct taxpayers to a § 1.1502–34 type of
analysis in determining whether the loss
is redetermined to be a noncapital,
nondeductible amount. Under the rule,
stock held by S, stock held by B, and
stock held by all members of the
consolidated group that includes S, as
well as stock held by any member of a
controlled group of which S is a
member that was acquired from a
member of S’s consolidated group must
be taken into account. After considering
the comment, the IRS and Treasury
Department believe that the rules in the
proposed regulations, as written, are
clear in that they expressly list the
corporations the stock holdings of
which must be taken into account.
Furthermore, the IRS and Treasury
Department believe that the proposed
regulation is appropriately broader than
the stock aggregation rule of § 1.1502–34
to account for, among other
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22481
considerations, the fact that the
controlled group definition is broader
than the definition of a consolidated
group.
In addition, the commentator
questioned whether the proposed
regulations were consistent with the
holdings in Granite Trust v. United
States, 238 F.2d 670 (1st Cir. 1956), and
other applicable case law. The IRS and
Treasury Department believe that the
rules contained in the proposed
regulations and these final regulations
are consistent with applicable case law.
These rules are intended to address the
timing for taking into account a loss on
a sale of property between members of
a controlled group, and do not relate to
whether a liquidation otherwise results
in the recognition of a loss.
Explanation of Provisions
These final regulations retain the
rules of the proposed regulations, but
make one revision to clarify the
interaction of section 267(f) and
§ 1.1502–13 principles. The final
regulations also make one modification
to ensure that taxpayers cannot
circumvent the purposes of the
proposed regulation through issuances
of target corporation stock to controlled
group members.
The proposed regulations provided
that a deferred loss is taken into account
to the extent of any corresponding gain
that the member acquiring the property
recognizes with respect to the property.
For example, assume S sells 30 percent
of T’s stock to B (a member of S’s
controlled group) at a loss (in a
transaction that is treated as a sale or
exchange for Federal income tax
purposes). If T’s stock appreciates after
the sale and before a subsequent event
that results in B’s recognition of gain,
the proposed regulations provided that
S’s deferred loss may be taken into
account to the extent that B recognizes
a corresponding gain.
Questions have been raised
concerning whether this rule is
necessary because the relevant
consolidated return provisions currently
allow the loss to be taken into account
to the extent of the corresponding gain.
The IRS and Treasury Department agree
that an explicit rule is unnecessary
because the timing of taking the loss
into account in these circumstances is
provided for under § 1.1502–13.
Accordingly, the rule in the proposed
regulations has been removed from the
final regulations and an example has
been added to § 1.267(f)–1(j) to illustrate
the interaction of these final regulations
and the consolidated return regulations.
In addition to this clarification, these
final regulations provide that stock
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
22482
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
issued to a member of the controlled
group by a target corporation is taken
into account for purposes of
determining whether a loss would be
treated as noncapital, nondeductible
amount if the rules of § 1.1502–13
applied. For example, assume FP is a
foreign corporation that owns all the
stock of FS, a foreign subsidiary, and all
the stock of P, a domestic corporation.
P owns all the stock of T. In Year 1, FS
contributes cash to T in exchange for
newly issued stock of T that constitutes
40 percent of T’s outstanding stock. In
Year 2, when the value of the T stock
owned by P is less than its basis in P’s
hands, P sells all of its T stock to FP.
In Year 3, in a transaction unrelated to
the issuance of the T stock in Year 1, T
converts under state law to a limited
liability company that is treated as a
partnership for Federal income tax
purposes.
Under these final regulations, the T
stock issued by T to FS is taken into
account for purposes of determining
whether, upon the conversion of T, P’s
deferred loss would be treated under the
principles of § 1.1502–13 as a
noncapital, nondeductible amount.
Special Analyses
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It has also
been determined that section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to this
regulation. Pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is
hereby certified that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This certification is based on the fact
that these regulations primarily affect
controlled groups of corporations which
tend to be larger businesses. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking
preceding this regulation was submitted
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for
comment on their impact on small
business. No comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this regulation
is Amie Colwell Breslow, Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate).
However, other personnel from the IRS
and Treasury Department participated
in its development.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:33 Apr 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805. * * *
Section 1.267(f)–1 is also issued under 26
U.S.C. 267.
Par. 2. Section 1.267(f)–1 is amended
as follows:
■ 1. Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) is revised.
■ 2. Adding Example 9 to paragraph (j).
■ 3. Adding Example 10 to paragraph
(j).
■ 4. Paragraph (l)(3) is redesignated as
paragraph (l)(4) and a new paragraph
(l)(3) is added.
The additions and revision read as
follows:
■
§ 1.267(f)–1
Controlled groups.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) B’s item is excluded from gross
income or noncapital and
nondeductible. To the extent S’s loss
would be redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount
under the principles of § 1.1502–13, but
is not redetermined under paragraph
(c)(2) of this section (which generally
renders the attribute redetermination
rule inapplicable to sales between
members of a controlled group), S’s loss
continues to be deferred. For purposes
of this paragraph, stock held by S, stock
held by B, stock held by all members of
S’s consolidated group, stock held by
any member of a controlled group of
which S is a member that was acquired
from a member of S’s consolidated
group, and stock issued by T to a
member of the controlled group must be
taken into account in determining
whether a loss would be redetermined
to be a noncapital, nondeductible
amount under the principles of
§ 1.1502–13. If the loss remains
deferred, it is taken into account when
S and B (including their successors) are
no longer in a controlled group
relationship. (If, however, the property
is transferred to certain related persons,
paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this section will
cause the loss to be permanently
disallowed.) For example, if S sells all
of the T stock to B at a loss (in a
transaction that is treated as a sale or
exchange for Federal income tax
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
purposes), and T subsequently
liquidates in an unrelated transaction
that qualifies under section 332, S’s loss
is deferred until S and B are no longer
in a controlled group relationship.
Similarly, if S owns all of the T stock
and sells 30 percent of T’s stock to B at
a loss (in a transaction that is treated as
a sale or exchange for Federal income
tax purposes), and T subsequently
liquidates, S’s loss on the sale is
deferred until S and B (including their
successors) are no longer in a controlled
group relationship.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
Example 9. Sale of stock by consolidated
group member to controlled group member.
(a) Facts. P1, a domestic corporation, owns
75% of the outstanding stock of P, the
common parent of a consolidated group. P
owns all of the outstanding stock of
subsidiaries M and S, which are members of
P’s consolidated group. M and S each own
50% of the only class of stock of L, a
nonmember life insurance company. On
January 1 of Year 1, S sells 25% of L’s stock
to P1 for $50 cash. At the time of the sale,
S’s aggregate basis in the L shares transferred
to P1 was $80, and S recognizes a $30 loss.
On February 18 of Year 3, at a time when the
L shares held by P1 are worth $60, L
liquidates. As a result of the liquidation, P1
recognizes a $10 gain.
(b) Timing. Under paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, S’s loss on the sale of the L stock to
P1 is deferred. Under paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of
this section, upon the liquidation of L, to the
extent S’s loss would be redetermined to be
a noncapital, nondeductible amount under
the principles of § 1.1502–13, S’s loss
continues to be deferred. Under the
principles of § 1.1502–13, S’s loss is not
redetermined to be a noncapital,
nondeductible amount to the extent of P1’s
$10 of gain recognized. Accordingly, S takes
into account $10 of loss as a result of the
liquidation. In determining whether the
remainder of S’s $20 loss would be
redetermined to be a noncapital,
nondeductible amount, under paragraph
(c)(1)(iv) of this section, stock held by P1,
stock held by M, and stock held by S is taken
into account. Accordingly, under the
principles of § 1.1502–13, the liquidation of
L would be treated as a liquidation qualifying
under section 332, and the remainder of S’s
loss would be redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount. Thus,
under paragraph (c)(1)(iv), S’s remaining $20
loss continues to be deferred until S and P1
are no longer in a controlled group
relationship.
Example 10. Issuance of stock to controlled
group member. (a) Facts. FP is a foreign
corporation that owns all the stock of FS, a
foreign corporation, and all the stock of P, a
domestic corporation. P owns all of the single
class of outstanding common stock of T. In
Year 1, FS contributes cash to T in exchange
for newly issued stock of T that constitutes
40 percent of T’s outstanding stock. In Year
2, when the value of the T stock owned by
P is less than its basis in P’s hands, P sells
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
all of its T stock to FP. In Year 3, in a
transaction unrelated to the issuance of the
T stock in Year 1, T converts under state law
to a limited liability company that is treated
as a partnership for Federal income tax
purposes.
(b) Timing. Under paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, P’s loss on the sale of its T stock is
deferred. Under paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this
section, upon the conversion of T, to the
extent P’s loss would be redetermined to be
a noncapital, nondeductible amount under
the principles of § 1.1502–13, P’s loss
continues to be deferred. In determining
whether the loss would be redetermined to
be a noncapital, nondeductible amount, stock
held by FS (which was acquired from T) and
stock held by FP (the buyer of the T stock
from P and a member of P’s controlled group)
is taken into account. Accordingly, under the
principles of § 1.1502–13 the deemed
liquidation of T resulting from the
conversion of T would be treated as a
liquidation qualifying under section 332, and
P’s loss would be redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount. Thus,
under paragraph (c)(1)(iv), P’s loss continues
to be deferred until P and FP are no longer
in a controlled group relationship.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
(3) Effective/applicability date.
Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this section
applies to a loss that continues to be
deferred pursuant to that paragraph if
the event that would cause the loss to
be redetermined as a noncapital
nondeductible amount under the
principles of § 1.1502–13 occurs on or
after April 16, 2012.
*
*
*
*
*
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: April 9, 2012.
Emily S. McMahon,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
(Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2012–9004 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9582]
RIN 1545–BH66
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
Guidance Under Sections 642 and 643
(Income Ordering Rules)
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final Regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
regulations under Internal Revenue
Code (Code) section 642(c) with regard
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:33 Apr 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
to the Federal tax consequences of an
ordering provision in a trust, a will, or
a provision of local law that attempts to
determine the tax character of the
amounts paid to a charitable beneficiary
of the trust or estate. The final
regulations also make conforming
amendments to the regulations under
section 643(a)(5). The final regulations
affect estates, charitable lead trusts
(CLTs), and other trusts making
payments or permanently setting aside
amounts for a charitable purpose.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on April 16, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Liquerman, at (202) 622–3060
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
On June 18, 2008, proposed
regulations (REG–101258–08) were
published in the Federal Register [73
FR 34670]. The proposed regulations
contain proposed amendments to the
Income Tax Regulations 26 CFR part 1,
confirming that a provision in a trust, a
will, or a provision of local law that
specifically indicates the source out of
which amounts are to be paid,
permanently set aside, or used for a
purpose specified in section 642(c) must
have economic effect independent of
income tax consequences in order to be
respected for Federal tax purposes. If
such provision does not have economic
effect independent of income tax
consequences, income distributed for a
purpose specified in section 642(c) will
consist of the same proportion of each
class of the items of income as the total
of each class bears to the total of all
classes. The proposed regulations also
make conforming changes in the
corresponding language in the Income
Tax Regulations under section 643(a)(5).
The trusts and estates that are the
subject of the proposed regulations
include, without limitation, charitable
lead trusts (CLTs) and trusts and estates
making payments or permanently
setting aside amounts for a charitable
purpose.
The proposed regulations are based
on the structure and provisions of
Subchapter J (of Chapter 1, Subtitle A,
of the Code) as a whole, as well as on
an analysis of the existing regulations
with their interrelated cross-references.
The IRS and Treasury Department
believe that the current regulations
under §§ 1.642(c)–3(b) and 1.643(a)–5(b)
require that a specific provision of the
governing instrument or a provision
under local law have economic effect
independent of income tax
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22483
consequences in order to be respected
for Federal income tax purposes. To
make this clearer, the proposed
regulations add the principle of
economic effect directly to the
regulations under sections 642(c) and
643(a), rather than leaving this principle
to be reached by cross-reference to other
regulations.
Finally, the proposed regulations
remove § 1.642(c)–3(b)(4) because the
provisions of section 116 referenced
therein were repealed by the Tax
Reform Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99–514).
Written comments were received on
the proposed regulations. Because there
were no requests to speak at the
scheduled public hearing, the public
hearing was cancelled. The proposed
regulations, with certain changes made
in response to the written comments
received, are adopted as final
regulations.
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Provisions
Specific Provisions Must Have
Economic Effect Independent of Income
Tax Consequences
Commentators suggested that the
clarification in the proposed
regulations, that a specific provision in
a governing instrument or in local law
that identifies the source(s) of the
amounts to be paid, permanently set
aside, or used for a purpose specified in
section 642(c) must have economic
effect independent of income tax
consequences in order for the specific
provision in the governing instrument
or in local law to be respected for
Federal tax purposes, is an
interpretation contrary to the clear
language of section 642(c) and 643(a)(5)
and the existing regulations.
The IRS and Treasury Department
have carefully considered these
arguments and the analyses suggested
by the commentators. The IRS and
Treasury Department continue to
believe that the position clarified in the
proposed regulations, requiring that a
specific provision of the governing
instrument or a provision under local
law have economic effect independent
of income tax consequences in order to
be respected for Federal tax purposes, is
the proper interpretation of the relevant
Code provisions and is a principle that
applies throughout Subchapter J.
The general rule provided in
Subchapter J, which mandates that the
tax character of distributions to
beneficiaries consists of a pro rata
portion of all types of a trust’s income,
appears in section 652(b) and in several
different sections of the regulations
under the subchapter. The only
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 73 (Monday, April 16, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22480-22483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9004]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9583]
RIN 1545-BI92
Guidance Under Section 267(f); Deferral of Loss on Transactions
Between Members of a Controlled Group
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations concerning the
deferral of losses on the sale or exchange of property between members
of a controlled group and provides guidance as to the time for taking
into account those losses. These regulations affect corporations that
are members of a controlled group.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on April 16,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amie Colwell Breslow (202) 622-7530
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 267(a)(1) provides that no deduction shall be allowed for
any loss on the sale or exchange of property between certain related
persons. Section 267(f)(2) contains an exception for a loss on the sale
or exchange of property between members of a controlled group. For this
purpose, ``controlled group'' has the meaning given to such term in
section 1563(a) except that ``more than 50 percent'' is substituted for
``at least 80 percent'' each place it appears. In the case of a sale or
exchange of loss property between members of a controlled group, the
loss is deferred rather than disallowed. Under section 267(f)(2)(B),
the loss is deferred until the property is transferred outside of the
controlled group and there would be recognition of loss under
consolidated return principles or until such other time as may be
prescribed in regulations.
The regulations under section 267(f) provide that the timing
principles for intercompany sales or exchanges between members of a
consolidated group (see generally Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(2)) apply to sales
or exchanges of property
[[Page 22481]]
at a loss between members of a controlled group. See Sec. 1.267(f)-
1(a)(2). The attribute redetermination rules applicable to transactions
between members of a consolidated group (see Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(1)),
however, do not apply to sales or exchanges between members of a
controlled group.
Although the attribute redetermination rule generally does not
apply to sales or exchanges between members of a controlled group,
Sec. 1.267(f)-1(c)(1)(iv) contains a special rule with respect to
losses that would have been redetermined to be a noncapital,
nondeductible amount if the consolidated return attribute
redetermination rule did apply. Under Sec. 1.267(f)-1(c)(1)(iv), if an
intercompany loss between members of a consolidated group would have
been redetermined to be a noncapital, nondeductible amount as a result
of the attribute redetermination rule applicable to consolidated
groups, but is not redetermined because the sale or exchange occurred
between members of a controlled group (to which the attribute
redetermination rule does not apply), then the loss will be deferred.
The loss is taken into account when the selling member (S) and buying
member (B) are no longer in a controlled group relationship.
On April 21, 2011, the IRS and Treasury Department published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-118761-09) in the Federal Register
(76 FR 22336). The notice included proposed regulations under section
267(f) providing guidance concerning the Federal income tax treatment
of deferred losses on the sale or exchange of property between members
of a controlled group, including transactions in which the member
acquiring the property subsequently recognizes a corresponding gain
with respect to the property. The proposed regulations provided that
certain losses on the sale or exchange of property between members of a
controlled group, which have been deferred, are taken into account upon
the occurrence of either of two events. The deferred loss is taken into
account to the extent of any corresponding gain that the member
acquiring the property recognizes with respect to the property.
Alternatively, the deferred loss is taken into account when the parties
to the transaction cease to be in a controlled group relationship. The
proposed regulations also provided that for purposes of determining
whether the loss is redetermined to be a noncapital, nondeductible
amount under the principles of Sec. 1.1502-13, stock held by S, stock
held by B, and stock held by all members of the consolidated group that
includes S, as well as stock held by any member of a controlled group
of which S is a member that was acquired from a member of S's
consolidated group, must be taken into account. A public hearing was
requested and held on August 3, 2011. The IRS received one formal
comment in response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. The comment
raised several questions with certain recommendations, which are
discussed in the following paragraphs of this preamble.
The commentator suggested that the final regulations incorporate a
model that allows a loss to be taken into account based on the arm's
length principles contained in section 482 and the regulations
thereunder. Specifically, the commentator noted that if the transaction
is arm's length in nature and has substance from a business
perspective, the loss should be taken into account immediately. The IRS
and Treasury Department do not agree with this comment. In a
transaction described in these regulations, it is assumed that the
parties are acting at arm's length. Section 267(f) serves a different
purpose, namely, to determine the timing of when a loss should be taken
into account on a sale or exchange of property between members of a
controlled group. Accordingly, the final regulations retain the model
contained in the proposed regulations.
The commentator also suggested that the proposed regulations do not
clearly state how to establish whether a recognized loss is
redetermined to be a noncapital, nondeductible amount under the
principles of Sec. 1.1502-13. Specifically, the commentator noted that
it is unclear whether the proposed regulations, as written, are
intended to direct taxpayers to a Sec. 1.1502-34 type of analysis in
determining whether the loss is redetermined to be a noncapital,
nondeductible amount. Under the rule, stock held by S, stock held by B,
and stock held by all members of the consolidated group that includes
S, as well as stock held by any member of a controlled group of which S
is a member that was acquired from a member of S's consolidated group
must be taken into account. After considering the comment, the IRS and
Treasury Department believe that the rules in the proposed regulations,
as written, are clear in that they expressly list the corporations the
stock holdings of which must be taken into account. Furthermore, the
IRS and Treasury Department believe that the proposed regulation is
appropriately broader than the stock aggregation rule of Sec. 1.1502-
34 to account for, among other considerations, the fact that the
controlled group definition is broader than the definition of a
consolidated group.
In addition, the commentator questioned whether the proposed
regulations were consistent with the holdings in Granite Trust v.
United States, 238 F.2d 670 (1st Cir. 1956), and other applicable case
law. The IRS and Treasury Department believe that the rules contained
in the proposed regulations and these final regulations are consistent
with applicable case law. These rules are intended to address the
timing for taking into account a loss on a sale of property between
members of a controlled group, and do not relate to whether a
liquidation otherwise results in the recognition of a loss.
Explanation of Provisions
These final regulations retain the rules of the proposed
regulations, but make one revision to clarify the interaction of
section 267(f) and Sec. 1.1502-13 principles. The final regulations
also make one modification to ensure that taxpayers cannot circumvent
the purposes of the proposed regulation through issuances of target
corporation stock to controlled group members.
The proposed regulations provided that a deferred loss is taken
into account to the extent of any corresponding gain that the member
acquiring the property recognizes with respect to the property. For
example, assume S sells 30 percent of T's stock to B (a member of S's
controlled group) at a loss (in a transaction that is treated as a sale
or exchange for Federal income tax purposes). If T's stock appreciates
after the sale and before a subsequent event that results in B's
recognition of gain, the proposed regulations provided that S's
deferred loss may be taken into account to the extent that B recognizes
a corresponding gain.
Questions have been raised concerning whether this rule is
necessary because the relevant consolidated return provisions currently
allow the loss to be taken into account to the extent of the
corresponding gain. The IRS and Treasury Department agree that an
explicit rule is unnecessary because the timing of taking the loss into
account in these circumstances is provided for under Sec. 1.1502-13.
Accordingly, the rule in the proposed regulations has been removed from
the final regulations and an example has been added to Sec. 1.267(f)-
1(j) to illustrate the interaction of these final regulations and the
consolidated return regulations.
In addition to this clarification, these final regulations provide
that stock
[[Page 22482]]
issued to a member of the controlled group by a target corporation is
taken into account for purposes of determining whether a loss would be
treated as noncapital, nondeductible amount if the rules of Sec.
1.1502-13 applied. For example, assume FP is a foreign corporation that
owns all the stock of FS, a foreign subsidiary, and all the stock of P,
a domestic corporation. P owns all the stock of T. In Year 1, FS
contributes cash to T in exchange for newly issued stock of T that
constitutes 40 percent of T's outstanding stock. In Year 2, when the
value of the T stock owned by P is less than its basis in P's hands, P
sells all of its T stock to FP. In Year 3, in a transaction unrelated
to the issuance of the T stock in Year 1, T converts under state law to
a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for
Federal income tax purposes.
Under these final regulations, the T stock issued by T to FS is
taken into account for purposes of determining whether, upon the
conversion of T, P's deferred loss would be treated under the
principles of Sec. 1.1502-13 as a noncapital, nondeductible amount.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It has also been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to this regulation. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby certified that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This certification is based on the fact that these
regulations primarily affect controlled groups of corporations which
tend to be larger businesses. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking preceding this
regulation was submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment on their impact on small business.
No comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this regulation is Amie Colwell Breslow,
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). However, other personnel
from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in its development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805. * * *
Section 1.267(f)-1 is also issued under 26 U.S.C. 267.
0
Par. 2. Section 1.267(f)-1 is amended as follows:
0
1. Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) is revised.
0
2. Adding Example 9 to paragraph (j).
0
3. Adding Example 10 to paragraph (j).
0
4. Paragraph (l)(3) is redesignated as paragraph (l)(4) and a new
paragraph (l)(3) is added.
The additions and revision read as follows:
Sec. 1.267(f)-1 Controlled groups.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) B's item is excluded from gross income or noncapital and
nondeductible. To the extent S's loss would be redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount under the principles of Sec. 1.1502-
13, but is not redetermined under paragraph (c)(2) of this section
(which generally renders the attribute redetermination rule
inapplicable to sales between members of a controlled group), S's loss
continues to be deferred. For purposes of this paragraph, stock held by
S, stock held by B, stock held by all members of S's consolidated
group, stock held by any member of a controlled group of which S is a
member that was acquired from a member of S's consolidated group, and
stock issued by T to a member of the controlled group must be taken
into account in determining whether a loss would be redetermined to be
a noncapital, nondeductible amount under the principles of Sec.
1.1502-13. If the loss remains deferred, it is taken into account when
S and B (including their successors) are no longer in a controlled
group relationship. (If, however, the property is transferred to
certain related persons, paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this section will
cause the loss to be permanently disallowed.) For example, if S sells
all of the T stock to B at a loss (in a transaction that is treated as
a sale or exchange for Federal income tax purposes), and T subsequently
liquidates in an unrelated transaction that qualifies under section
332, S's loss is deferred until S and B are no longer in a controlled
group relationship. Similarly, if S owns all of the T stock and sells
30 percent of T's stock to B at a loss (in a transaction that is
treated as a sale or exchange for Federal income tax purposes), and T
subsequently liquidates, S's loss on the sale is deferred until S and B
(including their successors) are no longer in a controlled group
relationship.
* * * * *
(j) * * *
Example 9. Sale of stock by consolidated group member to
controlled group member. (a) Facts. P1, a domestic corporation, owns
75% of the outstanding stock of P, the common parent of a
consolidated group. P owns all of the outstanding stock of
subsidiaries M and S, which are members of P's consolidated group. M
and S each own 50% of the only class of stock of L, a nonmember life
insurance company. On January 1 of Year 1, S sells 25% of L's stock
to P1 for $50 cash. At the time of the sale, S's aggregate basis in
the L shares transferred to P1 was $80, and S recognizes a $30 loss.
On February 18 of Year 3, at a time when the L shares held by P1 are
worth $60, L liquidates. As a result of the liquidation, P1
recognizes a $10 gain.
(b) Timing. Under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, S's loss on
the sale of the L stock to P1 is deferred. Under paragraph
(c)(1)(iv) of this section, upon the liquidation of L, to the extent
S's loss would be redetermined to be a noncapital, nondeductible
amount under the principles of Sec. 1.1502-13, S's loss continues
to be deferred. Under the principles of Sec. 1.1502-13, S's loss is
not redetermined to be a noncapital, nondeductible amount to the
extent of P1's $10 of gain recognized. Accordingly, S takes into
account $10 of loss as a result of the liquidation. In determining
whether the remainder of S's $20 loss would be redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount, under paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this
section, stock held by P1, stock held by M, and stock held by S is
taken into account. Accordingly, under the principles of Sec.
1.1502-13, the liquidation of L would be treated as a liquidation
qualifying under section 332, and the remainder of S's loss would be
redetermined to be a noncapital, nondeductible amount. Thus, under
paragraph (c)(1)(iv), S's remaining $20 loss continues to be
deferred until S and P1 are no longer in a controlled group
relationship.
Example 10. Issuance of stock to controlled group member. (a)
Facts. FP is a foreign corporation that owns all the stock of FS, a
foreign corporation, and all the stock of P, a domestic corporation.
P owns all of the single class of outstanding common stock of T. In
Year 1, FS contributes cash to T in exchange for newly issued stock
of T that constitutes 40 percent of T's outstanding stock. In Year
2, when the value of the T stock owned by P is less than its basis
in P's hands, P sells
[[Page 22483]]
all of its T stock to FP. In Year 3, in a transaction unrelated to
the issuance of the T stock in Year 1, T converts under state law to
a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for
Federal income tax purposes.
(b) Timing. Under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, P's loss on
the sale of its T stock is deferred. Under paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of
this section, upon the conversion of T, to the extent P's loss would
be redetermined to be a noncapital, nondeductible amount under the
principles of Sec. 1.1502-13, P's loss continues to be deferred. In
determining whether the loss would be redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount, stock held by FS (which was
acquired from T) and stock held by FP (the buyer of the T stock from
P and a member of P's controlled group) is taken into account.
Accordingly, under the principles of Sec. 1.1502-13 the deemed
liquidation of T resulting from the conversion of T would be treated
as a liquidation qualifying under section 332, and P's loss would be
redetermined to be a noncapital, nondeductible amount. Thus, under
paragraph (c)(1)(iv), P's loss continues to be deferred until P and
FP are no longer in a controlled group relationship.
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(3) Effective/applicability date. Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this
section applies to a loss that continues to be deferred pursuant to
that paragraph if the event that would cause the loss to be
redetermined as a noncapital nondeductible amount under the principles
of Sec. 1.1502-13 occurs on or after April 16, 2012.
* * * * *
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: April 9, 2012.
Emily S. McMahon,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2012-9004 Filed 4-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P