Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International Sematech, 22347-22348 [2012-8936]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Overview of This Information [OMB Number 1121–0240] 1. Type of information collection: Reinstatement of previously approved data collection, Survey of General Purpose Law Enforcement Agencies (SGPLEA), 2012. 2. The title of the form/collection: Survey of General Purpose Law Enforcement Agencies (SGPLEA), 2012. 3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: The form labels are SGPLEA, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. 4. Affected Public Who Will be Asked or Required to Respond, as well as a Brief Abstract: Respondents will be general purpose state and local law enforcement agencies, including police departments, sheriffs, and constables at the state, county and municipal level, including tribal law enforcement agencies. Abstract: The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) proposes to implement a Survey of General Purpose Law Enforcement Agencies (SGPLEA). This content of the survey builds upon the previous eight waves of the BJSsponsored surveys in the Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) Program. Like LEMAS, the SGPLEA will continue to generate nationallyrepresentative estimates of the nature of law enforcement agencies and personnel by focusing on a smaller set of core issues in contemporary policing. However, beginning with SGPLEA, BJS will produce law enforcement statistics on a regular two-year cycle. SGPLEA will include a consistent set of core items and topical supplements that will vary from wave to wave. In addition to core issues concerning the number and type of agencies, the nature and diversity of law enforcement personnel, employee wages and benefits, agency budgets and organizational responses to contemporary law enforcement issues, the 2012 SGPLEA supplemental components will collect information on the following topics: a. Recruitment and Retention of Staff; b. Community Policing; c. Information Systems; d. Officer Safety; e. Uses of Force. 5. An Estimate of the Total Number of Respondents and the Amount of Time Estimated for an Average Respondent to Respond: Based on the testing experience with the 2007 LEMAS survey, the reduction in the total number of variables included in SGPLEA form compared to the 2007 LEMAS forms, and the increased burden on smaller law enforcement agencies, Agency Information Collection Agencies: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested Reinstatement, With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection for Which Approval Has Expired: Survey of General Purpose Law Enforcement Agencies, 2012 60-Day notice of information collection under review. pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ACTION: The Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be submitting the following information collection request for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until June 12, 2012. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have additional comments, especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact: Joel Garner, Statistician, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, 810 Seventh Street NW., Washington, DC 20531 (phone: 202–307–0765). Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: 1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; 2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; 3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and 4. Minimize the burden of collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:16 Apr 12, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22347 BJS estimates that 3,000 respondents will complete the SGPLEA survey form with an average burden per respondent of 2.5 hours. 6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are an estimated 7,500 total annual burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Suite 2E–508, Washington, DC 20530. Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2012–8935 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International Sematech Notice is hereby given that, on March 16, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International Sematech (‘‘SEMATECH’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Centrotherm Photovoltaics AG, Blaubeuren, GERMANY; Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN; Inpria Corporation, Corvallis, OR; and Invensas Corporation, San Jose, CA, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, United Microelectronics Corporation, Inc., Hsinchu City, TAIWAN; and Asahi Glass Corporation, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, JAPAN, have withdrawn as parties to this venture. In addition, the following have been added as members to International SEMATECH Manufacturing Initiative, Inc. (‘‘ISMI’’): Winbond Electronics Corporation, Taichung City, TAIWAN; Macronix International Co. Ltd., Hsinchu, TAIWAN; and Renesas Electronics Corporation, Santa Clara, CA. E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1 22348 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Notices No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and SEMATECH intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR 17987). The last notification was filed with the Department on November 18, 2011. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 21, 2011 (76 FR 79219). Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Connected Media Experience, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on March 16, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Connected Media Experience, Inc. (‘‘CMX’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Xertive, Tel Aviv, ISRAEL, has withdrawn as a party to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and CMX intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On March 12, 2010, CMX filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 16, 2010 (75 FR 20003). The last notification was filed with the Department on December 21, 2011. Jkt 226001 [FR Doc. 2012–8941 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Investigation Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection, Comments Requested Revision of a Currently Approved Collection; Cargo Theft Incident Report The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with established review procedures of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until June 12, 2012. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. All comments, suggestions, or questions regarding additional information, to include obtaining a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions, should be directed to Mr. Gregory E. Scarbro, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation, CJIS Division, Module E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306, or facsimile to (304) 625–3566. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Comments should address one or more of the following four points: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques of other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection [OMB Number 1110–0048] 60-day Notice of Information Collection Under Review. BILLING CODE P 14:16 Apr 12, 2012 Patricia A. Brink, Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division. ACTION: [FR Doc. 2012–8936 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am] VerDate Mar<15>2010 A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 11, 2012 (77 FR 1727). (1) Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved collection. (2) The title of the form/collection: Cargo Theft Incident Report. (3) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the department sponsoring the collection: Form Number: None; Sponsor: Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: City, county, state, federal, and tribal law enforcement agencies. Brief Abstract: This collection is needed to collect information on cargo theft incidents committed throughout the United States. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: There are approximately 18,108 law enforcement agency respondents that submit monthly for a total of 217,296 responses with an estimated response time of 5 minutes per response. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with this collection: There are approximately 18,108 hours, annual burden, associated with this information collection. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, United States Department of Justice, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 2E–508, Washington, DC 20530. Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United States Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2012–8933 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–02–P E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22347-22348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International Sematech

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 16, 2012, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Sematech, Inc. d/b/a 
International Sematech (``SEMATECH'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Centrotherm Photovoltaics AG, Blaubeuren, 
GERMANY; Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN; Inpria 
Corporation, Corvallis, OR; and Invensas Corporation, San Jose, CA, 
have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, United Microelectronics Corporation, Inc., Hsinchu City, 
TAIWAN; and Asahi Glass Corporation, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, JAPAN, have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    In addition, the following have been added as members to 
International SEMATECH Manufacturing Initiative, Inc. (``ISMI''): 
Winbond Electronics Corporation, Taichung City, TAIWAN; Macronix 
International Co. Ltd., Hsinchu, TAIWAN; and Renesas Electronics 
Corporation, Santa Clara, CA.

[[Page 22348]]

    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and SEMATECH intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR 17987).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 18, 
2011. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 21, 2011 (76 FR 79219).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-8936 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.