Veterinary Feed Directive; Draft Text for Proposed Regulation, 22247-22249 [2012-8844]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Proposed Rules
brought to the center, no compensation
will be awarded for the loss or damage
of such property.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th of April
2012.
M. Patricia Smith,
Solicitor of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2012–8735 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 558
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0155]
Veterinary Feed Directive; Draft Text
for Proposed Regulation
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notification; draft text for
proposed regulation.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of draft text for a proposed
regulation intended to improve the
efficiency of FDA’s Veterinary Feed
Directive (VFD) program. The Agency is
making this draft text for a proposal
available because of the complex
scientific and regulatory issues
involved, and because of the potential
impact that changes to the VFD
regulations may have on stakeholders.
The Agency invites the public to submit
comments with questions and concerns
about the draft text for a proposed
regulation.
SUMMARY:
Submit either electronic or
written comments by July 12, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2010–N–
0155, by any of the following methods:
DATES:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Apr 12, 2012
Jkt 226001
Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0155 for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Benz, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–220), Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–453–6864,
email: Sharon.Benz@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This document is related to two other
documents published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, wherein
FDA is announcing: (1) The availability
of a guidance document entitled ‘‘The
Judicious Use of Medically Important
Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing
Animals’’ (GFI #209) and (2) the
availability of a draft guidance
document entitled ‘‘New Animal Drugs
and New Animal Drug Combination
Products Administered in or on
Medicated Feed or Drinking Water of
Food-Producing Animals:
Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for
Voluntarily Aligning Product Use
Conditions With GFI #209’’ (draft GFI
#213).
In the Federal Register of March 29,
2010 (75 FR 15387), FDA published an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPRM) with a 90-day comment
period requesting comments on all
aspects of the VFD regulations. FDA
published a subsequent document in the
Federal Register of June 28, 2010 (75 FR
36588), extending the ANPRM comment
period for an additional 60 days.
While FDA encouraged comments on
all aspects of the VFD regulations, the
Agency requested input specifically on
whether efficiency improvements need
to be made to the current VFD
regulations. The Agency received
considerable comments from
stakeholders suggesting that efficiency
improvements are needed for the VFD
regulations. FDA reviewed comments to
the docket and, based on its review of
those comments, developed draft text of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22247
regulatory language intended to
implement specified changes to the
existing regulations in part 558 (21 CFR
part 558).
Comments to the docket confirmed
that this is a very complex issue that
potentially affects many different
stakeholder interests. Having carefully
considered the comments and other
relevant information, the Agency has
prepared draft text for revisions to the
existing regulatory language in part 558.
Because stakeholders’ interests are
varied, striking the proper regulatory
balance between sufficient veterinary
oversight for VFD drugs and increased
efficiency of the VFD process is a
challenging proposition. Given the
number and the nature of the comments
received, and given the considerable
impact proposed revisions potentially
could have on stakeholders, FDA
believes it is appropriate, before
publishing an additional proposed rule,
to offer stakeholders an opportunity to
review and comment on our draft text
of proposed revisions to the codified
language in part 558.
For that reason, as provided for in
§§ 10.40(f)(4) and 10.80(b)(2) (21 CFR
10.40(f)(4) and 21 CFR 10.80(b)(2)), FDA
has decided to publish the draft text of
proposed revisions to the codified
language that the Agency has developed
in response to public comments on this
issue. FDA believes that, by making this
document available under the
provisions of §§ 10.40(f)(4) and
10.80(b)(2) and allowing an additional
public comment period prior to
publishing an additional proposed rule
under the provisions of 21 CFR 10.40(b),
the Agency will be able to develop a
more informed proposal. When FDA
publishes the proposed rule, the Agency
will provide a detailed discussion of
proposed changes to existing
regulations.
The proposed revisions announced in
this document were developed in
conjunction with other initiatives
designed to transition certain new
animal drug products containing
medically important antimicrobial drugs
from an over-the-counter (OTC) status to
a status that requires veterinary
oversight. Specifically, the draft text of
proposed revisions to part 558 reflect
principles expressed in FDA’s guidance
document entitled ‘‘The Judicious Use
of Medically Important Antimicrobial
Drugs in Food-Producing Animals’’ (GFI
#209). Further, this draft text of
proposed revisions is also consistent
with the specific recommendations
described in FDA’s draft guidance
document entitled ‘‘New Animal Drugs
and New Animal Drug Combination
Products Administered in or on
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
22248
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Medicated Feed or Drinking Water of
Food-Producing Animals:
Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for
Voluntarily Aligning Product Use
Conditions With GFI #209’’ (draft GFI
#213). The notices of availability for GFI
#209 and draft GFI #213 are both
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
FDA acknowledges that in order to
facilitate the transition of certain new
animal drug products from an OTC
status to a status that requires veterinary
oversight, existing requirements related
to the distribution and use of VFD drugs
must be updated and streamlined. As
reflected in the draft text of proposed
revisions to part 558 in this document,
some of the key changes being
considered include (1) providing for
alignment between the criteria for
appropriate veterinary supervision or
oversight and those established as part
of veterinary licensing and practice
requirements, (2) providing
veterinarians greater flexibility to
exercise their professional discretion to
authorize producer access to
appropriate VFD drugs, and (3)
streamlining administrative procedures.
To facilitate the transition from OTC to
VFD status, FDA believes it is critically
important that changes such as these be
implemented to minimize impacts on
veterinarians, the animal feed industry,
and animal producers.
FDA is requesting comments on the
draft text of proposed revisions to part
558 as well as comments on any other
aspect of the VFD regulations, including
aspects of the regulations not
specifically addressed in the draft text
of the proposal. FDA recognizes that it
is critically important that the Agency
work with the veterinary and animal
producer communities, the end users of
the affected products, to ensure that
their concerns are taken into
consideration as these changes are
implemented. With this in mind, FDA is
very interested in receiving comments
on the practical implications of these
changes for animal producers,
particularly those with smaller
operations in remote locations. The
Agency is also interested in receiving
input on how impacts or disruption to
animal producers could be minimized.
FDA acknowledges that one issue of
concern is the ability of producers,
particularly those with smaller
operations in remote locations, to have
adequate access to veterinary services.
Therefore, as steps are taken to phase in
the changes discussed in this document,
FDA recognizes the need to
concurrently engage key stakeholders on
this broader issue. Therefore, FDA
intends to work collaboratively with U.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Apr 12, 2012
Jkt 226001
S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to
engage the veterinary community and
other stakeholders to explore strategic
approaches (e.g., new models, pilot
programs) to address this issue.
FDA encourages the submission of
comments on the draft text of this
proposed regulation so that practical
implementation concerns are adequately
considered and addressed. However,
FDA is also exploring other venues for
seeking and obtaining input,
particularly from animal producers,
such as through listening sessions held
in various parts of the country. FDA is
working closely with the USDA to
identify mechanisms for obtaining this
critical input.
The draft text of the proposed
regulation is provided in this document
and in the docket (refer to the docket
number in brackets in the heading of
this document). The Agency emphasizes
that the draft text of the proposed
revisions does not represent final
Agency action or the Agency’s final
decision on this regulation.
(ii) Category II—These drugs require a
withdrawal period at the lowest use
level for at least one species for which
they are approved, or are regulated on
a ‘‘no-residue’’ basis or with a zero
tolerance because of a carcinogenic
concern regardless of whether a
withdrawal period is required.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) A ‘‘veterinary feed directive’’ is a
written statement issued by a licensed
veterinarian in the course of the
veterinarian’s professional practice that
orders the use of a VFD drug in or on
an animal feed. This written statement
authorizes the client (the owner of the
animal or animals or other caretaker) to
obtain and use the VFD drug in or on
an animal feed to treat the client’s
animals only in accordance with the
directions for use approved,
conditionally approved, or indexed by
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA).
*
*
*
*
*
3. Revise § 558.6 to read as follows:
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments on this document. It is only
necessary to send one set of comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
§ 558.6
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 558
Animal drugs, Animal feeds.
Accordingly, 21 CFR part 558 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 558—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR
USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 558 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371.
2. In § 558.3, republish the
introductory text of paragraph (b), and
revise paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(7) to
read as follows:
§ 558.3 Definitions and general
considerations applicable to this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The following definitions apply to
terms used in this part:
(1) New animal drugs approved for
use in animal feed are placed in two
categories as follows:
(i) Category I—These drugs require no
withdrawal period at the lowest use
level in each species for which they are
approved.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Veterinary feed directive drugs.
(a) General requirements related to
veterinary feed directives (VFD):
(1) A feed containing a VFD drug (a
VFD feed) shall be fed to animals only
by or upon a lawful VFD issued by a
licensed veterinarian in the course of
the veterinarian’s professional practice.
(2) VFDs may not be filled after the
expiration date on the VFD.
(3) Use and labeling of a VFD drug in
feed is limited to the approved,
conditionally approved, or indexed
conditions of use. Extralabel use (i.e.,
actual or intended use other than as
directed on the labeling) is not
permitted.
(4) All involved parties (the
veterinarian, the distributor, and the
client) must retain a copy of the VFD
and any other required records for 1
year.
(5) All involved parties must make the
VFD and any other records specified in
this section available for inspection and
copying by FDA.
(6) All labeling and advertising for
VFD drugs and feeds containing VFD
drugs must prominently and
conspicuously display the following
cautionary statement: ‘‘Caution: Federal
law restricts medicated feed containing
this VFD drug to use by or on the order
of a licensed veterinarian.’’
(b) Responsibilities of the veterinarian
issuing the VFD:
(1) The veterinarian may only issue a
VFD for use in animals under his or her
supervision or oversight in the course of
his or her professional practice, and in
compliance with all applicable
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Proposed Rules
veterinary licensing and practice
requirements.
(2) The veterinarian must fully and
accurately enter the following
information on the VFD:
(i) The veterinarian’s name, address,
and telephone number;
(ii) The client’s name, telephone
number, and business or home address;
(iii) The premises at which the
animals specified in the VFD are
located;
(iv) The date of VFD issuance;
(v) The expiration date of the VFD.
This date cannot extend beyond the
expiration date specified in the
approval, conditional approval, or index
listing, if such date is specified. In cases
where the expiration date is not
specified in the approval, conditional
approval, or index listing, the expiration
date of the VFD cannot exceed 6 months
after the date of issuance;
(vi) The name of the animal drug;
(vii) The species and production class
of animals to be fed the medicated feed;
(viii) The approximate number of
animals to be fed the medicated feed
prior to the expiration date on the VFD;
(ix) The indication for which the VFD
is issued;
(x) The level of drug in the feed and
duration of use;
(xi) The withdrawal time, special
instructions, and cautionary statements
necessary for use of the drug in
conformance with the approval;
(xii) The number of reorders (refills)
authorized, if permitted by the drug
approval, conditional approval, or index
listing;
(xiii) The statement: ‘‘Extralabel use
(i.e., use of this VFD feed in a manner
other than as directed on the labeling)
is not permitted’’; and
(xiv) The veterinarian’s electronic or
written signature.
(3) The veterinarian may, at his or her
discretion, enter the following
information on the VFD to more
specifically identify the animals
authorized to be treated/fed the
medicated feed:
(i) A more specific description of the
location of animals (e.g., by site, pen,
barn, stall, tank, or other descriptor that
the veterinarian deems appropriate);
(ii) The approximate age range of the
animals;
(iii) The approximate weight range of
the animals; and
(iv) Any other information the
veterinarian deems appropriate to
identify the animals specified in the
VFD.
(4) The veterinarian must send the
VFD to the feed distributor via
hardcopy, fax, or electronically. If in
hardcopy, the veterinarian may send the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Apr 12, 2012
Jkt 226001
VFD to the distributor either directly or
through the client.
(5) The veterinarian must provide a
copy of the VFD to the client.
(6) The veterinarian may not transmit
a VFD by phone.
(c) Responsibilities of any person who
distributes an animal feed containing a
VFD drug:
(1) The distributor may only fill a
VFD if the VFD contains the information
required in § 558.6(b)(2).
(2) The distributor may only
distribute an animal feed containing a
VFD drug that complies with the terms
of the VFD.
(3) A distributor of animal feed
containing VFD drugs must notify FDA
at the time it first distributes animal
feed containing VFD drugs. The
notification is required one time per
distributor and must include the
following information:
(i) The distributor’s complete name
and business address;
(ii) The distributor’s signature or the
signature of the distributor’s authorized
agent; and
(iii) The date the notification was
signed;
(4) A distributor must submit the
notification by letter or facsimile to the
Food and Drug Administration, Center
for Veterinary Medicine, Division of
Animal Feeds (HFV–220), 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, prior
to beginning its first distribution.
(5) A distributor must notify the
Center for Veterinary Medicine within
30 days of any change in ownership,
business name, or business address.
(6) A distributor may only distribute
a VFD feed to another person for further
distribution if the distributor first
obtains a written acknowledgment from
the person to whom the feed is shipped
stating that that person must not ship or
move such feed to an animal production
facility without a VFD, or ship such feed
to another person for further
distribution unless that person has
provided the same written
acknowledgment to the distributor’s
immediate supplier.
Dated: April 5, 2012.
David Dorsey,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. 2012–8844 Filed 4–11–12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22249
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2009–0648; FRL–9658–2]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New Mexico;
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County:
Infrastructure and Interstate Transport
Requirements for the 1997 and 2008
Ozone and the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
submittals from the Governor of New
Mexico to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) for the City of Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County area, pursuant to the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) that
address the infrastructure elements
specified in the CAA section 110(a)(2),
necessary to implement, maintain, and
enforce the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
and the 1997 and 2006 fine particulate
matter (PM2.5) national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS or
standards). We are proposing to find
that the current Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County SIP meets the following
infrastructure elements for the 1997 and
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS:
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are also
proposing to find that the current
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County SIP
meets one of the four provisions of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), which addresses
the requirement that emissions from
sources in the area do not interfere with
measures required in the SIP of any
other state under part C of the CAA to
prevent significant deterioration (PSD)
of air quality, with regard to the 1997
and 2008 ozone and 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is also proposing to
approve SIP revisions that modify the
PSD SIP to include nitrogen oxides
(NOX) as an ozone precursor. For
purposes of the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS, EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County PSD SIP that identify the PM2.5
precursors and establish significant
emission rates for said precursors,
consistent with the federal
requirements. We are also proposing to
approve other revisions to the
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County PSD SIP
to maintain consistency with the federal
PSD permitting requirements. In
addition to these revisions, EPA is
proposing to approve other revisions to
the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County SIP
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22247-22249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8844]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 558
[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0155]
Veterinary Feed Directive; Draft Text for Proposed Regulation
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notification; draft text for proposed regulation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of draft text for a proposed regulation intended to
improve the efficiency of FDA's Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD)
program. The Agency is making this draft text for a proposal available
because of the complex scientific and regulatory issues involved, and
because of the potential impact that changes to the VFD regulations may
have on stakeholders. The Agency invites the public to submit comments
with questions and concerns about the draft text for a proposed
regulation.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by July 12, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2010-
N-0155, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name
and Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0155 for this rulemaking. All comments
received may be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. For additional information
on submitting comments, see the ``Comments'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Benz, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-220), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240-453-6864, email: Sharon.Benz@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This document is related to two other documents published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register, wherein FDA is announcing: (1)
The availability of a guidance document entitled ``The Judicious Use of
Medically Important Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing Animals''
(GFI 209) and (2) the availability of a draft guidance
document entitled ``New Animal Drugs and New Animal Drug Combination
Products Administered in or on Medicated Feed or Drinking Water of
Food-Producing Animals: Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for
Voluntarily Aligning Product Use Conditions With GFI 209''
(draft GFI 213).
In the Federal Register of March 29, 2010 (75 FR 15387), FDA
published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) with a 90-
day comment period requesting comments on all aspects of the VFD
regulations. FDA published a subsequent document in the Federal
Register of June 28, 2010 (75 FR 36588), extending the ANPRM comment
period for an additional 60 days.
While FDA encouraged comments on all aspects of the VFD
regulations, the Agency requested input specifically on whether
efficiency improvements need to be made to the current VFD regulations.
The Agency received considerable comments from stakeholders suggesting
that efficiency improvements are needed for the VFD regulations. FDA
reviewed comments to the docket and, based on its review of those
comments, developed draft text of regulatory language intended to
implement specified changes to the existing regulations in part 558 (21
CFR part 558).
Comments to the docket confirmed that this is a very complex issue
that potentially affects many different stakeholder interests. Having
carefully considered the comments and other relevant information, the
Agency has prepared draft text for revisions to the existing regulatory
language in part 558. Because stakeholders' interests are varied,
striking the proper regulatory balance between sufficient veterinary
oversight for VFD drugs and increased efficiency of the VFD process is
a challenging proposition. Given the number and the nature of the
comments received, and given the considerable impact proposed revisions
potentially could have on stakeholders, FDA believes it is appropriate,
before publishing an additional proposed rule, to offer stakeholders an
opportunity to review and comment on our draft text of proposed
revisions to the codified language in part 558.
For that reason, as provided for in Sec. Sec. 10.40(f)(4) and
10.80(b)(2) (21 CFR 10.40(f)(4) and 21 CFR 10.80(b)(2)), FDA has
decided to publish the draft text of proposed revisions to the codified
language that the Agency has developed in response to public comments
on this issue. FDA believes that, by making this document available
under the provisions of Sec. Sec. 10.40(f)(4) and 10.80(b)(2) and
allowing an additional public comment period prior to publishing an
additional proposed rule under the provisions of 21 CFR 10.40(b), the
Agency will be able to develop a more informed proposal. When FDA
publishes the proposed rule, the Agency will provide a detailed
discussion of proposed changes to existing regulations.
The proposed revisions announced in this document were developed in
conjunction with other initiatives designed to transition certain new
animal drug products containing medically important antimicrobial drugs
from an over-the-counter (OTC) status to a status that requires
veterinary oversight. Specifically, the draft text of proposed
revisions to part 558 reflect principles expressed in FDA's guidance
document entitled ``The Judicious Use of Medically Important
Antimicrobial Drugs in Food-Producing Animals'' (GFI 209).
Further, this draft text of proposed revisions is also consistent with
the specific recommendations described in FDA's draft guidance document
entitled ``New Animal Drugs and New Animal Drug Combination Products
Administered in or on
[[Page 22248]]
Medicated Feed or Drinking Water of Food-Producing Animals:
Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for Voluntarily Aligning Product Use
Conditions With GFI 209'' (draft GFI 213). The
notices of availability for GFI 209 and draft GFI 213
are both published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
FDA acknowledges that in order to facilitate the transition of
certain new animal drug products from an OTC status to a status that
requires veterinary oversight, existing requirements related to the
distribution and use of VFD drugs must be updated and streamlined. As
reflected in the draft text of proposed revisions to part 558 in this
document, some of the key changes being considered include (1)
providing for alignment between the criteria for appropriate veterinary
supervision or oversight and those established as part of veterinary
licensing and practice requirements, (2) providing veterinarians
greater flexibility to exercise their professional discretion to
authorize producer access to appropriate VFD drugs, and (3)
streamlining administrative procedures. To facilitate the transition
from OTC to VFD status, FDA believes it is critically important that
changes such as these be implemented to minimize impacts on
veterinarians, the animal feed industry, and animal producers.
FDA is requesting comments on the draft text of proposed revisions
to part 558 as well as comments on any other aspect of the VFD
regulations, including aspects of the regulations not specifically
addressed in the draft text of the proposal. FDA recognizes that it is
critically important that the Agency work with the veterinary and
animal producer communities, the end users of the affected products, to
ensure that their concerns are taken into consideration as these
changes are implemented. With this in mind, FDA is very interested in
receiving comments on the practical implications of these changes for
animal producers, particularly those with smaller operations in remote
locations. The Agency is also interested in receiving input on how
impacts or disruption to animal producers could be minimized.
FDA acknowledges that one issue of concern is the ability of
producers, particularly those with smaller operations in remote
locations, to have adequate access to veterinary services. Therefore,
as steps are taken to phase in the changes discussed in this document,
FDA recognizes the need to concurrently engage key stakeholders on this
broader issue. Therefore, FDA intends to work collaboratively with U.
S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to engage the veterinary community
and other stakeholders to explore strategic approaches (e.g., new
models, pilot programs) to address this issue.
FDA encourages the submission of comments on the draft text of this
proposed regulation so that practical implementation concerns are
adequately considered and addressed. However, FDA is also exploring
other venues for seeking and obtaining input, particularly from animal
producers, such as through listening sessions held in various parts of
the country. FDA is working closely with the USDA to identify
mechanisms for obtaining this critical input.
The draft text of the proposed regulation is provided in this
document and in the docket (refer to the docket number in brackets in
the heading of this document). The Agency emphasizes that the draft
text of the proposed revisions does not represent final Agency action
or the Agency's final decision on this regulation.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments on this document.
It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments
with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 558
Animal drugs, Animal feeds.
Accordingly, 21 CFR part 558 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 558--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 558 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371.
2. In Sec. 558.3, republish the introductory text of paragraph
(b), and revise paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(7) to read as follows:
Sec. 558.3 Definitions and general considerations applicable to this
part.
* * * * *
(b) The following definitions apply to terms used in this part:
(1) New animal drugs approved for use in animal feed are placed in
two categories as follows:
(i) Category I--These drugs require no withdrawal period at the
lowest use level in each species for which they are approved.
(ii) Category II--These drugs require a withdrawal period at the
lowest use level for at least one species for which they are approved,
or are regulated on a ``no-residue'' basis or with a zero tolerance
because of a carcinogenic concern regardless of whether a withdrawal
period is required.
* * * * *
(7) A ``veterinary feed directive'' is a written statement issued
by a licensed veterinarian in the course of the veterinarian's
professional practice that orders the use of a VFD drug in or on an
animal feed. This written statement authorizes the client (the owner of
the animal or animals or other caretaker) to obtain and use the VFD
drug in or on an animal feed to treat the client's animals only in
accordance with the directions for use approved, conditionally
approved, or indexed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
* * * * *
3. Revise Sec. 558.6 to read as follows:
Sec. 558.6 Veterinary feed directive drugs.
(a) General requirements related to veterinary feed directives
(VFD):
(1) A feed containing a VFD drug (a VFD feed) shall be fed to
animals only by or upon a lawful VFD issued by a licensed veterinarian
in the course of the veterinarian's professional practice.
(2) VFDs may not be filled after the expiration date on the VFD.
(3) Use and labeling of a VFD drug in feed is limited to the
approved, conditionally approved, or indexed conditions of use.
Extralabel use (i.e., actual or intended use other than as directed on
the labeling) is not permitted.
(4) All involved parties (the veterinarian, the distributor, and
the client) must retain a copy of the VFD and any other required
records for 1 year.
(5) All involved parties must make the VFD and any other records
specified in this section available for inspection and copying by FDA.
(6) All labeling and advertising for VFD drugs and feeds containing
VFD drugs must prominently and conspicuously display the following
cautionary statement: ``Caution: Federal law restricts medicated feed
containing this VFD drug to use by or on the order of a licensed
veterinarian.''
(b) Responsibilities of the veterinarian issuing the VFD:
(1) The veterinarian may only issue a VFD for use in animals under
his or her supervision or oversight in the course of his or her
professional practice, and in compliance with all applicable
[[Page 22249]]
veterinary licensing and practice requirements.
(2) The veterinarian must fully and accurately enter the following
information on the VFD:
(i) The veterinarian's name, address, and telephone number;
(ii) The client's name, telephone number, and business or home
address;
(iii) The premises at which the animals specified in the VFD are
located;
(iv) The date of VFD issuance;
(v) The expiration date of the VFD. This date cannot extend beyond
the expiration date specified in the approval, conditional approval, or
index listing, if such date is specified. In cases where the expiration
date is not specified in the approval, conditional approval, or index
listing, the expiration date of the VFD cannot exceed 6 months after
the date of issuance;
(vi) The name of the animal drug;
(vii) The species and production class of animals to be fed the
medicated feed;
(viii) The approximate number of animals to be fed the medicated
feed prior to the expiration date on the VFD;
(ix) The indication for which the VFD is issued;
(x) The level of drug in the feed and duration of use;
(xi) The withdrawal time, special instructions, and cautionary
statements necessary for use of the drug in conformance with the
approval;
(xii) The number of reorders (refills) authorized, if permitted by
the drug approval, conditional approval, or index listing;
(xiii) The statement: ``Extralabel use (i.e., use of this VFD feed
in a manner other than as directed on the labeling) is not permitted'';
and
(xiv) The veterinarian's electronic or written signature.
(3) The veterinarian may, at his or her discretion, enter the
following information on the VFD to more specifically identify the
animals authorized to be treated/fed the medicated feed:
(i) A more specific description of the location of animals (e.g.,
by site, pen, barn, stall, tank, or other descriptor that the
veterinarian deems appropriate);
(ii) The approximate age range of the animals;
(iii) The approximate weight range of the animals; and
(iv) Any other information the veterinarian deems appropriate to
identify the animals specified in the VFD.
(4) The veterinarian must send the VFD to the feed distributor via
hardcopy, fax, or electronically. If in hardcopy, the veterinarian may
send the VFD to the distributor either directly or through the client.
(5) The veterinarian must provide a copy of the VFD to the client.
(6) The veterinarian may not transmit a VFD by phone.
(c) Responsibilities of any person who distributes an animal feed
containing a VFD drug:
(1) The distributor may only fill a VFD if the VFD contains the
information required in Sec. 558.6(b)(2).
(2) The distributor may only distribute an animal feed containing a
VFD drug that complies with the terms of the VFD.
(3) A distributor of animal feed containing VFD drugs must notify
FDA at the time it first distributes animal feed containing VFD drugs.
The notification is required one time per distributor and must include
the following information:
(i) The distributor's complete name and business address;
(ii) The distributor's signature or the signature of the
distributor's authorized agent; and
(iii) The date the notification was signed;
(4) A distributor must submit the notification by letter or
facsimile to the Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary
Medicine, Division of Animal Feeds (HFV-220), 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, prior to beginning its first distribution.
(5) A distributor must notify the Center for Veterinary Medicine
within 30 days of any change in ownership, business name, or business
address.
(6) A distributor may only distribute a VFD feed to another person
for further distribution if the distributor first obtains a written
acknowledgment from the person to whom the feed is shipped stating that
that person must not ship or move such feed to an animal production
facility without a VFD, or ship such feed to another person for further
distribution unless that person has provided the same written
acknowledgment to the distributor's immediate supplier.
Dated: April 5, 2012.
David Dorsey,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 2012-8844 Filed 4-11-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P