Maher Terminal, LLC, 21981 [2012-8777]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Notices
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE
UNITED STATES
Economic Impact Policy
This notice is to inform the public
that the Export-Import Bank of the
United States has received an
application for a $19.5 million longterm guarantee to support the export of
approximately $30 million worth of
mining trucks to the Ukraine. The
repayment term of the guarantee is 7
years. The U.S. exports will enable the
Ukrainian mining company to establish
a maximum production capacity of 28
million metric tons of iron ore per year.
Available information indicates that all
of the Ukrainian iron ore production
will be sold domestically in the
Ukraine. Interested parties may submit
comments on this transaction by email
to economic.impact@exim.gov or by
mail to 811 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Room 947, Washington, DC 20571,
within 14 days of the date this notice
appears in the Federal Register.
Angela Mariana Freyre,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012–8829 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 12–02]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Maher Terminal, LLC v. The Port
Authority of New York and New Jersey;
Notice of Filing of Complaint and
Assignment
Notice is given that a complaint has
been filed with the Federal Maritime
Commission (Commission’’ by Maher
Terminal, LLC, hereinafter
‘‘Complainant’’ against the Port
Authority of New York and New Jersey
(PANYNJ), hereinafter ‘‘Respondent’’.
Complainant asserts that it is a limited
liability company registered in the State
of Delaware with corporate offices and
facilities located in Elizabeth, New
Jersey. Complainant asserts that
Respondent, PANYNJ, is a body
corporate and politic created by
Compact between the States of New
York and New Jersey and with the
consent of the Congress; has offices
located in New York, New York; owns
marine terminal facilities in the New
York New Jersey area, including in
Elizabeth, New Jersey; and is a marine
terminal operator.
Complainant contends that
Respondent violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c),
41106(2), 41106(3) and 41106(1)
respectively, because Respondent:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Apr 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
(a) has and continues to fail to establish,
observe, and enforce just and reasonable
regulations and practices relating to or
connected with receiving, handling, storing
or delivery property; (b) gave and continues
to give an undue or unreasonable prejudice
or disadvantage with respect to Maher and
gave and continues to give an undue or
unreasonable preference or advantage with
respect to Maersk, APM, MSC, PNCT, NYCT,
and Global, and other marine container
terminal operators and ocean carriers; (c) has
and continues to unreasonably refuse to deal
or negotiate with Maher; and (d) has and
continues to agree with another marine
terminal operator or common carrier to
boycott and/or unreasonably discriminate in
the provision of terminal services to a
common carrier.
Complainant asserts that it has
sustained injuries and damages, as a
result of Respondent’s actions,
‘‘including but not limited to higher
costs and other undue and unreasonable
payments, economic considerations,
restrictions on transfers and/or changes
in ownership or control interests, lost
business, forgone business, and
additional obligations not required of
* * * other marine terminals and other
damages amounting to a sum of millions
of dollars* * *’’ The full text of the
complaint can be found in the
Commission’s Electronic Reading Room
at www.fmc.gov.
Complainant requests that the
Commission require Respondent to: (1)
Answer he charges in the subject
complaint; (2) cease and desist from the
aforementioned violations of the
Shipping Act; (3) provide to
Complainant the preferences provided
to other marine terminal operators; (4)
put in force such practices and as the
Commission determines to be lawful
and reasonable; and (5) pay to
Complainant by way of reparations the
amount of the actual injury, plus
interest, cost and attorneys fees, and any
other damages to be determined.
Additionally, Complainant requests that
the Commission order any such other
relief as it determines appropriate.
This proceeding has been assigned to
the Office of Administrative Law Judges.
Hearing in this matter, if any is held,
shall commence within the time
limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61,
and only after consideration has been
given by the parties and the presiding
officer to the use of alternative forms of
dispute resolution. The hearing shall
include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the
presiding officer only upon proper
showing that there are genuine issues of
material fact that cannot be resolved on
the basis of sworn statements, affidavits,
depositions, or other documents or that
the nature of the matter in issue is such
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21981
that an oral hearing and crossexamination are necessary for the
development of an adequate record.
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR
502.61, the initial decision of the
presiding officer in this proceeding shall
be issued by April 8, 2013, and the final
decision of the Commission shall be
issued by August 6, 2013.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–8777 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than May 7, 2012.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
(Richard Walker, Community Affairs
Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston,
Massachusetts 02210–2204:
1. Coastway Bancorp, MHC and
Coastway Bancorp, LLC, both in
Cranston, Rhode Island; to become a
mutual bank holding company and a
stock bank holding company,
respectively, by acquiring 100 percent of
the voting shares of Coastway
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8777]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
[Docket No. 12-02]
Maher Terminal, LLC v. The Port Authority of New York and New
Jersey; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment
Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal
Maritime Commission (Commission'' by Maher Terminal, LLC, hereinafter
``Complainant'' against the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
(PANYNJ), hereinafter ``Respondent''. Complainant asserts that it is a
limited liability company registered in the State of Delaware with
corporate offices and facilities located in Elizabeth, New Jersey.
Complainant asserts that Respondent, PANYNJ, is a body corporate and
politic created by Compact between the States of New York and New
Jersey and with the consent of the Congress; has offices located in New
York, New York; owns marine terminal facilities in the New York New
Jersey area, including in Elizabeth, New Jersey; and is a marine
terminal operator.
Complainant contends that Respondent violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c),
41106(2), 41106(3) and 41106(1) respectively, because Respondent:
(a) has and continues to fail to establish, observe, and enforce
just and reasonable regulations and practices relating to or
connected with receiving, handling, storing or delivery property;
(b) gave and continues to give an undue or unreasonable prejudice or
disadvantage with respect to Maher and gave and continues to give an
undue or unreasonable preference or advantage with respect to
Maersk, APM, MSC, PNCT, NYCT, and Global, and other marine container
terminal operators and ocean carriers; (c) has and continues to
unreasonably refuse to deal or negotiate with Maher; and (d) has and
continues to agree with another marine terminal operator or common
carrier to boycott and/or unreasonably discriminate in the provision
of terminal services to a common carrier.
Complainant asserts that it has sustained injuries and damages, as
a result of Respondent's actions, ``including but not limited to higher
costs and other undue and unreasonable payments, economic
considerations, restrictions on transfers and/or changes in ownership
or control interests, lost business, forgone business, and additional
obligations not required of * * * other marine terminals and other
damages amounting to a sum of millions of dollars* * *'' The full text
of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading
Room at www.fmc.gov.
Complainant requests that the Commission require Respondent to: (1)
Answer he charges in the subject complaint; (2) cease and desist from
the aforementioned violations of the Shipping Act; (3) provide to
Complainant the preferences provided to other marine terminal
operators; (4) put in force such practices and as the Commission
determines to be lawful and reasonable; and (5) pay to Complainant by
way of reparations the amount of the actual injury, plus interest, cost
and attorneys fees, and any other damages to be determined.
Additionally, Complainant requests that the Commission order any such
other relief as it determines appropriate.
This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of Administrative
Law Judges. Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence
within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after
consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer
to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing
shall include oral testimony and cross-examination in the discretion of
the presiding officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine
issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn
statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the
nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and cross-
examination are necessary for the development of an adequate record.
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of
the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by April 8,
2013, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by
August 6, 2013.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8777 Filed 4-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
