Special Conditions: Boeing, Model 777F; Enhanced Flight Vision System, 21861-21864 [2012-8739]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
interest payment made to it to the party that
is entitled to compensation in the form of
interest from a Federal Reserve Bank. The
benefit may be passed on either in the form
of a direct payment of interest or in the form
of a compensating balance, if the party
entitled to interest agrees to accept the other
form of compensation, and the value of the
compensating balance is at least equivalent to
the value of the explicit interest that
otherwise would have been provided.
*
*
*
*
*
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, April 5, 2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012–8563 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0352; Special
Conditions No. 25–462–SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing, Model
777F; Enhanced Flight Vision System
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Boeing Model 777F
airplane. This airplane, as modified by
the FedEx Express Corporation, will
have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with an advanced, enhanced
flight vision system (EFVS). The EFVS
consists of a head-up display (HUD)
system modified to display forwardlooking infrared (FLIR) imagery. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is March 22, 2012.
We must receive your comments by May
14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2012–0352
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Apr 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.
dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale
Dunford, FAA, Transport Standards
Staff, ANM–111, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2239; fax 425–227–
1320; email: dale.dunford@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice of, and
opportunity for prior public comment
on, these special conditions are
impracticable because these procedures
would significantly delay issuance of
the design approval and thus delivery of
the affected aircraft. In addition, the
substance of these special conditions
has been subject to the public-comment
process in several prior instances with
no substantive comments received. The
FAA therefore finds that good cause
exists for making these special
conditions effective upon issuance.
21861
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Comments Invited
Background
On November 17, 2010, the FedEx
Express Corporation applied for a
supplemental type certificate for the
installation and operation of a HUD and
an EFVS in the Boeing Model 777F. The
original type certificate for the 777F
airplanes is T00001SE, Revision 28,
dated August 5, 2011.
The Boeing Model 777F is a transportcategory, cargo-carrying airplane that
operates with a crew of two. It is
powered by two General Electric GE90–
110B1 or GE90–115B turbofan engines,
has a maximum gross takeoff weight of
766,800 pounds, and a maximum range
of 4,900 nautical miles.
The electronic infrared image
displayed between the pilot and the
forward windshield represents a novel
or unusual design feature in the context
of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) 25.773. Section 25.773 was not
written in anticipation of such
technology. The electronic image has
the potential to enhance the pilot’s
awareness of the terrain, hazards, and
airport features. At the same time, the
image may partially obscure the pilot’s
direct outside compartment view.
Therefore, the FAA needs adequate
safety standards to evaluate the EFVS to
determine that the imagery provides the
intended visual enhancements without
undue interference with the pilot’s
outside compartment view. The FAA’s
intent is that the pilot will be able to use
a combination of the information seen
in the image and the natural view of the
outside scene, as seen through the
image, as safely and effectively as a pilot
compartment view without an enhanced
vision system (EVS) image, and is
compliant with § 25.773.
Although the FAA has determined
that the existing regulations are not
adequate for certification of EFVSs, it
believes that EFVSs could be certified
through application of appropriate
safety criteria. Therefore, the FAA has
determined that special conditions
should be issued for certification of
EFVSs to provide a level of safety
equivalent to that provided by the
standard in § 25.773.
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
Note: The term ‘‘enhanced vision system’’
(EVS) in this document refers to a system
comprised of a head-up display (HUD),
imaging sensor(s), and avionics interfaces
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
21862
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
that display the sensor imagery on the HUD,
and overlay that imagery with alpha-numeric
and symbolic flight information. However,
the term has also been commonly used in
reference to systems that display the sensor
imagery, with or without other flight
information, on a head-down display. For
clarity, the FAA created the term ‘‘enhanced
flight vision system’’ (EFVS) to refer to
certain EVS systems that meet the
requirements of the new operational rules—
in particular, the requirement for a HUD and
specified flight information—and which can
be used to determine ‘‘enhanced flight
visibility.’’ An EFVS can be considered a
subset of a system otherwise labeled EVS.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
On January 9, 2004, the FAA
published revisions to operational rules
in 14 CFR parts 1, 91, 121, 125, and 135
to allow aircraft to operate below certain
altitudes during a straight-in instrument
approach while using an EFVS to meet
visibility requirements.
Prior to this rule change, the FAA
issued Special Conditions No. 25–180–
SC, which applied to an EVS installed
on Gulfstream Model G–V airplanes.
Those special conditions addressed the
requirements for the pilot compartment
view and limited the scope of the
intended functions permissible under
the operational rules at the time. The
intended function of the EVS imagery
was to aid the pilot during the approach
and allow the pilot to detect and
identify the visual references for the
intended runway down to 100 feet
above the touchdown zone. However,
the EVS imagery alone was not to be
used as a means to satisfy visibility
requirements below 100 feet.
The recent operational rule change
expands the permissible application of
certain EVSs that are certified to meet
the new EFVS standards. The new rule
allows the use of an EFVS for operation
below the minimum descent altitude or
decision height to meet new visibility
requirements of § 91.175(l). The purpose
of these special conditions is not only
to address the issue of the ‘‘pilot
compartment view,’’ as was done by
Special Conditions No. 25–180–SC, but
also to define the scope of intended
function consistent with § 91.175(l) and
(m).
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.101, the FedEx Express Corporation
must show that the Boeing Model 777F,
as changed, continues to meet the
applicable provisions of the regulations
incorporated by reference in Type
Certificate No. T00001SE or the
applicable regulations in effect on the
date of application for the change. The
regulations incorporated by reference in
the type certificate are commonly
referred to as the ‘‘original type
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Apr 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
certification basis.’’ The regulations
incorporated by reference are listed in
Type Certificate Data Sheet No.
T00001SE, Revision 28, dated August 5,
2011, which covers all variants of the
Boeing 777 airplanes. In addition, the
certification basis includes certain
special conditions and exemptions that
are not relevant to these special
conditions.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Boeing Model 777F because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the applicant apply
for a supplemental type certificate to
modify any other model included on the
same type certificate to incorporate the
same novel or unusual design feature,
the special conditions would also apply
to the other model.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model 777F must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19 in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Boeing Model 777F will
incorporate the following novel or
unusual design feature: An EFVS that
projects a video image derived from a
FLIR camera through the HUD. The
EFVS image is projected in the center of
the ‘‘pilot compartment view,’’ which is
governed by § 25.773. The image is
displayed with HUD symbology and
overlays the forward outside view.
Therefore, § 25.773 does not contain
appropriate safety standards for the
EFVS display.
Operationally, during an instrument
approach, the EFVS image is intended
to enhance the pilot’s ability to detect
and identify ‘‘visual references for the
intended runway’’ [see § 91.175(l)(3)] to
continue the approach below decision
height or minimum descent altitude.
Depending on atmospheric conditions
and the strength of infrared energy
emitted and/or reflected from the scene,
the pilot can see these visual references
in the image better than they can be
seen through the window without
EFVS.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Scene contrast detected by infrared
sensors can be much different from that
detected by natural pilot vision. On a
dark night, thermal differences of
objects which are not detectable by the
unaided eye are easily detected by many
imaging infrared systems. On the other
hand, contrasting colors in visual
wavelengths may be distinguished by
the naked eye but not by an imaging
infrared system. Where thermal contrast
in the scene is sufficiently detectable,
the pilot can recognize shapes and
patterns of certain visual references in
the infrared image. However, depending
on conditions, those shapes and
patterns in the infrared image can
appear significantly different than they
would with normal vision. Considering
these factors, the EFVS image needs to
be evaluated to determine that it can be
accurately interpreted by the pilot.
The EFVS image may improve the
pilot’s ability to detect and identify
items of interest. However, the EFVS
needs to be evaluated to determine that
the imagery allows the pilot to perform
the normal flightcrew duties and
adequately see outside the window
through the image, consistent with the
safety intent of § 25.773(a)(2).
Compared to a HUD displaying the
EFVS image and symbology, a HUD that
only displays stroke-written symbols is
easier to see through. Stroke symbology
illuminates a small fraction of the total
display area of the HUD, leaving much
of that area free of reflected light that
could interfere with the pilot’s view out
the window through the display.
However, unlike stroke symbology, the
video image illuminates most of the
total display area of the HUD
(approximately 30 degrees horizontally
and 25 degrees vertically), which is a
significant fraction of the pilot
compartment view. The pilot cannot see
around the larger illuminated portions
of the video image, but must see the
outside scene through it.
Unlike the pilot’s external view, the
EFVS image is a monochrome, twodimensional display. Many, but not all,
of the depth cues found in the natural
view are also found in the image. The
quality of the EFVS image and the level
of EFVS infrared-sensor performance
could depend significantly on
conditions of the atmospheric and
external light sources. The pilot needs
adequate control of sensor gain and
image brightness, which can
significantly affect image quality and
transparency (i.e., the ability to see the
outside view through the image).
Certain system characteristics could
create distracting and confusing display
artifacts. Finally, because this is a
sensor-based system intended to
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
provide a conformal perspective
corresponding with the outside scene,
the system must be able to ensure
accurate alignment. Therefore, safety
standards are needed for each of the
following factors:
• An acceptable degree of image
transparency;
• Image alignment;
• Lack of significant distortion; and
• The potential for pilot confusion or
misleading information.
Section 25.773, Pilot compartment
view, specifies that ‘‘Each pilot
compartment must be free of glare and
reflection that could interfere with the
normal duties of the minimum flight
crew * * *.’’ In issuing § 25.773, the
FAA did not anticipate the development
of the EFVS and does not consider that
§ 25.773 adequately addresses the
specific issues related to such a system.
Therefore, the FAA has determined that
special conditions are needed to address
the specific issues particular to the
installation and use of an EFVS.
Discussion
The EFVS is intended to present an
enhanced view during the landing
approach. This enhanced view would
help the pilot see and recognize external
visual references, as required by
§ 91.175(l), and to visually monitor the
integrity of the approach, as described
in FAA Order 6750.24D, ‘‘Instrument
Landing System and Ancillary
Electronic Component Configuration
and Performance Requirements,’’ dated
March 1, 2000.
Based on this approved functionality,
users would seek to obtain operational
approval to conduct approaches,
including approaches to Type I
runways, in visibility conditions much
lower than those for conventional
Category I.
The purpose of these special
conditions is to ensure that the EFVS to
be installed can perform the following
functions:
• Present an enhanced view that aids
the pilot during the approach.
• Provide enhanced flight visibility to
the pilot that is no less than the
visibility prescribed in the standard
instrument approach procedure.
• Display an image that the pilot can
use to detect and identify the ‘‘visual
references for the intended runway’’
required by 14 CFR 91.175(l)(3) to
continue the approach with vertical
guidance to 100 feet height above the
touchdown-zone elevation.
Depending on the atmospheric
conditions and the particular visual
references that happen to be distinctly
visible and detectable in the EFVS
image, these functions would support
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Apr 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
its use by the pilot to visually monitor
the integrity of the approach path.
Compliance with these special
conditions does not affect the
applicability of any of the requirements
of the operating regulations (i.e., 14 CFR
parts 91, 121, and 135). Furthermore,
use of the EFVS does not change the
approach minima prescribed in the
standard instrument approach
procedure being used; published
minima still apply.
The FAA certification of this EFVS is
limited as follows:
1. The infrared-based EFVS image
will not be certified as a means to satisfy
the requirements for descent below 100
feet height above touchdown.
2. The EFVS may be used as a
supplemental device to enhance the
pilot’s situational awareness during any
phase of flight or operation in which its
safe use has been established.
An EFVS image may provide an
enhanced image of the scene that may
compensate for any reduction in the
clear outside view of the visual field
framed by the HUD combiner. The pilot
must be able to use this combination of
information seen in the image and the
natural view of the outside scene, as
seen through the image, as safely and
effectively as the pilot would use a pilot
compartment view without an EVS
image that is compliant with § 25.773.
This is the fundamental objective of the
special conditions.
The FAA will also apply additional
certification criteria, not as special
conditions, for compliance with related
regulatory requirements, such as
§§ 25.1301 and 25.1309. These
additional criteria address certain image
characteristics, installation,
demonstration, and system safety.
Image-characteristics criteria include
the following:
• Resolution
• Luminance
• Luminance uniformity
• Low-level luminance
• Contrast variation
• Display quality
• Display dynamics (e.g., jitter,
flicker, update rate, and lag)
• Brightness controls
Installation criteria address visibility
and access to EFVS controls and
integration of EFVS in the cockpit.
The EFVS demonstration criteria
address the flight and environmental
conditions that need to be covered.
The FAA also intends to apply
certification criteria relevant to highintensity radiated fields (HIRF) and
lightning protection.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Boeing
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21863
Model 777F. Should the FedEx Express
Corporation apply at a later date for a
supplemental type certificate to modify
any other model included on Type
Certificate No. T00001SE to incorporate
the same novel or unusual design
feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on Boeing
777F airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability and it affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several
prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. Therefore, because a
delay would significantly affect the
certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are
unnecessary and impracticable, and
good cause exists for adopting these
special conditions upon issuance. The
FAA is requesting comments to allow
interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in
response to the prior opportunities for
comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the typecertification basis for Boeing Model
777F airplanes modified by the FedEx
Express Corporation.
1. Enhanced flight vision system
(EFVS) imagery on the head-up display
(HUD) must not degrade the safety of
flight or interfere with the effective use
of outside visual references for required
pilot tasks during any phase of flight in
which it is to be used.
2. To avoid unacceptable interference
with the safe and effective use of the
pilot compartment view, the EFVS
device must meet the following
requirements:
a. The EFVS design must minimize
unacceptable display characteristics or
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
21864
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
artifacts (e.g., noise, ‘‘burlap’’ overlay,
running water droplets) that obscure the
desired image of the scene, impair the
pilot’s ability to detect and identify
visual references, mask flight hazards,
distract the pilot, or otherwise degrade
task performance or safety.
b. Automatic control of EFVS display
brightness must be sufficiently effective,
in dynamically changing background
(ambient) lighting conditions, to prevent
full or partial blooming of the display
that would distract the pilot, impair the
pilot’s ability to detect and identify
visual references, mask flight hazards,
or otherwise degrade task performance
or safety. If automatic control for image
brightness is not provided, it must be
shown that a single manual setting is
satisfactory for the range of lighting
conditions encountered during a timecritical, high-workload phase of flight
(e.g., low visibility instrument
approach).
c. A readily accessible control must be
provided that permits the pilot to
immediately deactivate and reactivate
display of the EFVS image on demand
without removing the pilot’s hands from
the primary flight controls (yoke or
equivalent) or thrust control.
d. The EFVS image on the HUD must
not impair the pilot’s use of guidance
information, or degrade the presentation
and pilot awareness of essential flight
information displayed on the HUD, such
as alerts, airspeed, attitude, altitude and
direction, approach guidance,
windshear guidance, traffic alert and
collision avoidance system (TCAS)
resolution advisories, or unusual
attitude recovery cues.
e. The EFVS image and the HUD
symbols, which are spatially referenced
to the pitch scale, outside view, and
image, must be scaled and aligned (i.e.,
conformal) to the external scene. In
addition, the EFVS image and the HUD
symbols, when considered singly or in
combination, must not be misleading,
cause pilot confusion or increase
workload. Airplane attitudes or
crosswind conditions may cause certain
symbols (e.g., the zero-pitch line or
flight path vector) to reach field-of-view
limits such that they cannot be
positioned conformally with the image
and external scene. In such cases, these
symbols may be displayed but with an
altered appearance, which makes the
pilot aware that they are no longer
displayed conformally (for example,
‘‘ghosting’’).
f. A HUD system used to display
EFVS images must, if previously
certified, continue to meet all of the
requirements of the original approval.
3. The safety and performance of the
pilot tasks associated with the use of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Apr 11, 2012
Jkt 226001
pilot compartment view must not be
degraded by the display of the EFVS
image. Pilot tasks that must not be
degraded by the EFVS image include:
a. Detection, accurate identification,
and maneuvering, as necessary, to avoid
traffic, terrain, obstacles, and other
hazards of flight.
b. Accurate identification and
utilization of visual references required
for every task relevant to the phase of
flight.
4. Use of EFVS for instrument
approach operations must be in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 91.175(l) and (m) and § 121.651 where
applicable. Appropriate limitations
must be stated in the operating
limitations section of the airplane flight
manual to prohibit the use of the EFVS
for functions that have not been found
to be acceptable.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
22, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
well as documents mentioned in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG–2011–
1013 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–1013 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Lee Soule, Bridge
Management Specialist, Ninth Coast
Guard District; telephone (216) 902–
6085, email lee.d.soule@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing material in
the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2012–8739 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am]
Regulatory Information
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
On December 8, 2011, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; Saginaw River, Bay City, MI,
in the Federal Register (76 FR 76637).
We received one comment in response
to the proposed rule supporting the
NPRM as written. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2011–1013]
Basis and Purpose
RIN 1625–AA09
Lake Carriers Association (LCA), an
organization representing U.S. shipping
companies on the Great Lakes,
requested that the existing drawbridge
regulation for Saginaw River be
reviewed and changed to make the
regulation easier to understand and to
remove restrictive drawbridge schedules
for commercial vessels. The existing
regulation was reviewed in its entirety
for all drawbridges, vessel types, dates,
and hours of operation.
Lake State Railway Bridge at mile 3.10
is a swing bridge that provides 7 feet
vertical clearance in the closed position
and unlimited clearance in the open
position. The Independence Bridge at
mile 3.88 is a bascule bridge that
provides 22 feet vertical clearance in the
closed position and unlimited clearance
in the open position. The Canadian
National Railway (CN RR) Bridge at mile
4.94 is a swing bridge that provides 8
feet of vertical clearance in the closed
position and unlimited clearance in the
open position. The Liberty Street Bridge
at mile 4.99 is a bascule bridge that
provides 25 feet of vertical clearance in
the closed position and unlimited
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Saginaw River, Bay City, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is revising
the drawbridge opening schedule for the
Lake State Railway Bridge at mile 3.10,
the Independence Bridge at mile 3.88,
the Canadian National Railway Bridge at
mile 4.94, the Liberty Street Bridge at
mile 4.99, the Veterans Memorial Bridge
at mile 5.60, and the Lafayette Street
Bridge at mile 6.78, all over the Saginaw
River at Bay City, MI. The previous
regulation was confusing, outdated, and
unnecessarily restrictive for both
commercial and recreational vessels.
The revised regulation will simplify the
regulatory language, increase access
through the drawbridges for all vessels,
and provide for the reasonable needs of
all traffic.
DATES: This rule is effective May 14,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments and related
materials received from the public, as
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21861-21864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8739]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0352; Special Conditions No. 25-462-SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing, Model 777F; Enhanced Flight Vision
System
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Boeing Model 777F
airplane. This airplane, as modified by the FedEx Express Corporation,
will have a novel or unusual design feature associated with an
advanced, enhanced flight vision system (EFVS). The EFVS consists of a
head-up display (HUD) system modified to display forward-looking
infrared (FLIR) imagery. The applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is March 22,
2012. We must receive your comments by May 14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2012-0352
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Dunford, FAA, Transport Standards
Staff, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
425-227-2239; fax 425-227-1320; email: dale.dunford@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice of, and
opportunity for prior public comment on, these special conditions are
impracticable because these procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the design approval and thus delivery of the affected
aircraft. In addition, the substance of these special conditions has
been subject to the public-comment process in several prior instances
with no substantive comments received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these special conditions effective upon
issuance.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We may change these special conditions based on the
comments we receive.
Background
On November 17, 2010, the FedEx Express Corporation applied for a
supplemental type certificate for the installation and operation of a
HUD and an EFVS in the Boeing Model 777F. The original type certificate
for the 777F airplanes is T00001SE, Revision 28, dated August 5, 2011.
The Boeing Model 777F is a transport-category, cargo-carrying
airplane that operates with a crew of two. It is powered by two General
Electric GE90-110B1 or GE90-115B turbofan engines, has a maximum gross
takeoff weight of 766,800 pounds, and a maximum range of 4,900 nautical
miles.
The electronic infrared image displayed between the pilot and the
forward windshield represents a novel or unusual design feature in the
context of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.773.
Section 25.773 was not written in anticipation of such technology. The
electronic image has the potential to enhance the pilot's awareness of
the terrain, hazards, and airport features. At the same time, the image
may partially obscure the pilot's direct outside compartment view.
Therefore, the FAA needs adequate safety standards to evaluate the EFVS
to determine that the imagery provides the intended visual enhancements
without undue interference with the pilot's outside compartment view.
The FAA's intent is that the pilot will be able to use a combination of
the information seen in the image and the natural view of the outside
scene, as seen through the image, as safely and effectively as a pilot
compartment view without an enhanced vision system (EVS) image, and is
compliant with Sec. 25.773.
Although the FAA has determined that the existing regulations are
not adequate for certification of EFVSs, it believes that EFVSs could
be certified through application of appropriate safety criteria.
Therefore, the FAA has determined that special conditions should be
issued for certification of EFVSs to provide a level of safety
equivalent to that provided by the standard in Sec. 25.773.
Note: The term ``enhanced vision system'' (EVS) in this
document refers to a system comprised of a head-up display (HUD),
imaging sensor(s), and avionics interfaces
[[Page 21862]]
that display the sensor imagery on the HUD, and overlay that imagery
with alpha-numeric and symbolic flight information. However, the
term has also been commonly used in reference to systems that
display the sensor imagery, with or without other flight
information, on a head-down display. For clarity, the FAA created
the term ``enhanced flight vision system'' (EFVS) to refer to
certain EVS systems that meet the requirements of the new
operational rules--in particular, the requirement for a HUD and
specified flight information--and which can be used to determine
``enhanced flight visibility.'' An EFVS can be considered a subset
of a system otherwise labeled EVS.
On January 9, 2004, the FAA published revisions to operational
rules in 14 CFR parts 1, 91, 121, 125, and 135 to allow aircraft to
operate below certain altitudes during a straight-in instrument
approach while using an EFVS to meet visibility requirements.
Prior to this rule change, the FAA issued Special Conditions No.
25-180-SC, which applied to an EVS installed on Gulfstream Model G-V
airplanes. Those special conditions addressed the requirements for the
pilot compartment view and limited the scope of the intended functions
permissible under the operational rules at the time. The intended
function of the EVS imagery was to aid the pilot during the approach
and allow the pilot to detect and identify the visual references for
the intended runway down to 100 feet above the touchdown zone. However,
the EVS imagery alone was not to be used as a means to satisfy
visibility requirements below 100 feet.
The recent operational rule change expands the permissible
application of certain EVSs that are certified to meet the new EFVS
standards. The new rule allows the use of an EFVS for operation below
the minimum descent altitude or decision height to meet new visibility
requirements of Sec. 91.175(l). The purpose of these special
conditions is not only to address the issue of the ``pilot compartment
view,'' as was done by Special Conditions No. 25-180-SC, but also to
define the scope of intended function consistent with Sec. 91.175(l)
and (m).
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, the FedEx Express
Corporation must show that the Boeing Model 777F, as changed, continues
to meet the applicable provisions of the regulations incorporated by
reference in Type Certificate No. T00001SE or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of application for the change. The
regulations incorporated by reference in the type certificate are
commonly referred to as the ``original type certification basis.'' The
regulations incorporated by reference are listed in Type Certificate
Data Sheet No. T00001SE, Revision 28, dated August 5, 2011, which
covers all variants of the Boeing 777 airplanes. In addition, the
certification basis includes certain special conditions and exemptions
that are not relevant to these special conditions.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Boeing Model 777F because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model included on the same type
certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
the special conditions would also apply to the other model.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model 777F must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19 in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Boeing Model 777F will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design feature: An EFVS that projects a video image derived
from a FLIR camera through the HUD. The EFVS image is projected in the
center of the ``pilot compartment view,'' which is governed by Sec.
25.773. The image is displayed with HUD symbology and overlays the
forward outside view. Therefore, Sec. 25.773 does not contain
appropriate safety standards for the EFVS display.
Operationally, during an instrument approach, the EFVS image is
intended to enhance the pilot's ability to detect and identify ``visual
references for the intended runway'' [see Sec. 91.175(l)(3)] to
continue the approach below decision height or minimum descent
altitude. Depending on atmospheric conditions and the strength of
infrared energy emitted and/or reflected from the scene, the pilot can
see these visual references in the image better than they can be seen
through the window without EFVS.
Scene contrast detected by infrared sensors can be much different
from that detected by natural pilot vision. On a dark night, thermal
differences of objects which are not detectable by the unaided eye are
easily detected by many imaging infrared systems. On the other hand,
contrasting colors in visual wavelengths may be distinguished by the
naked eye but not by an imaging infrared system. Where thermal contrast
in the scene is sufficiently detectable, the pilot can recognize shapes
and patterns of certain visual references in the infrared image.
However, depending on conditions, those shapes and patterns in the
infrared image can appear significantly different than they would with
normal vision. Considering these factors, the EFVS image needs to be
evaluated to determine that it can be accurately interpreted by the
pilot.
The EFVS image may improve the pilot's ability to detect and
identify items of interest. However, the EFVS needs to be evaluated to
determine that the imagery allows the pilot to perform the normal
flightcrew duties and adequately see outside the window through the
image, consistent with the safety intent of Sec. 25.773(a)(2).
Compared to a HUD displaying the EFVS image and symbology, a HUD
that only displays stroke-written symbols is easier to see through.
Stroke symbology illuminates a small fraction of the total display area
of the HUD, leaving much of that area free of reflected light that
could interfere with the pilot's view out the window through the
display. However, unlike stroke symbology, the video image illuminates
most of the total display area of the HUD (approximately 30 degrees
horizontally and 25 degrees vertically), which is a significant
fraction of the pilot compartment view. The pilot cannot see around the
larger illuminated portions of the video image, but must see the
outside scene through it.
Unlike the pilot's external view, the EFVS image is a monochrome,
two-dimensional display. Many, but not all, of the depth cues found in
the natural view are also found in the image. The quality of the EFVS
image and the level of EFVS infrared-sensor performance could depend
significantly on conditions of the atmospheric and external light
sources. The pilot needs adequate control of sensor gain and image
brightness, which can significantly affect image quality and
transparency (i.e., the ability to see the outside view through the
image). Certain system characteristics could create distracting and
confusing display artifacts. Finally, because this is a sensor-based
system intended to
[[Page 21863]]
provide a conformal perspective corresponding with the outside scene,
the system must be able to ensure accurate alignment. Therefore, safety
standards are needed for each of the following factors:
An acceptable degree of image transparency;
Image alignment;
Lack of significant distortion; and
The potential for pilot confusion or misleading
information.
Section 25.773, Pilot compartment view, specifies that ``Each pilot
compartment must be free of glare and reflection that could interfere
with the normal duties of the minimum flight crew * * *.'' In issuing
Sec. 25.773, the FAA did not anticipate the development of the EFVS
and does not consider that Sec. 25.773 adequately addresses the
specific issues related to such a system. Therefore, the FAA has
determined that special conditions are needed to address the specific
issues particular to the installation and use of an EFVS.
Discussion
The EFVS is intended to present an enhanced view during the landing
approach. This enhanced view would help the pilot see and recognize
external visual references, as required by Sec. 91.175(l), and to
visually monitor the integrity of the approach, as described in FAA
Order 6750.24D, ``Instrument Landing System and Ancillary Electronic
Component Configuration and Performance Requirements,'' dated March 1,
2000.
Based on this approved functionality, users would seek to obtain
operational approval to conduct approaches, including approaches to
Type I runways, in visibility conditions much lower than those for
conventional Category I.
The purpose of these special conditions is to ensure that the EFVS
to be installed can perform the following functions:
Present an enhanced view that aids the pilot during the
approach.
Provide enhanced flight visibility to the pilot that is no
less than the visibility prescribed in the standard instrument approach
procedure.
Display an image that the pilot can use to detect and
identify the ``visual references for the intended runway'' required by
14 CFR 91.175(l)(3) to continue the approach with vertical guidance to
100 feet height above the touchdown-zone elevation.
Depending on the atmospheric conditions and the particular visual
references that happen to be distinctly visible and detectable in the
EFVS image, these functions would support its use by the pilot to
visually monitor the integrity of the approach path.
Compliance with these special conditions does not affect the
applicability of any of the requirements of the operating regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR parts 91, 121, and 135). Furthermore, use of the EFVS
does not change the approach minima prescribed in the standard
instrument approach procedure being used; published minima still apply.
The FAA certification of this EFVS is limited as follows:
1. The infrared-based EFVS image will not be certified as a means
to satisfy the requirements for descent below 100 feet height above
touchdown.
2. The EFVS may be used as a supplemental device to enhance the
pilot's situational awareness during any phase of flight or operation
in which its safe use has been established.
An EFVS image may provide an enhanced image of the scene that may
compensate for any reduction in the clear outside view of the visual
field framed by the HUD combiner. The pilot must be able to use this
combination of information seen in the image and the natural view of
the outside scene, as seen through the image, as safely and effectively
as the pilot would use a pilot compartment view without an EVS image
that is compliant with Sec. 25.773. This is the fundamental objective
of the special conditions.
The FAA will also apply additional certification criteria, not as
special conditions, for compliance with related regulatory
requirements, such as Sec. Sec. 25.1301 and 25.1309. These additional
criteria address certain image characteristics, installation,
demonstration, and system safety. Image-characteristics criteria
include the following:
Resolution
Luminance
Luminance uniformity
Low-level luminance
Contrast variation
Display quality
Display dynamics (e.g., jitter, flicker, update rate, and
lag)
Brightness controls
Installation criteria address visibility and access to EFVS
controls and integration of EFVS in the cockpit.
The EFVS demonstration criteria address the flight and
environmental conditions that need to be covered.
The FAA also intends to apply certification criteria relevant to
high-intensity radiated fields (HIRF) and lightning protection.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Boeing Model 777F. Should the FedEx Express Corporation apply at a
later date for a supplemental type certificate to modify any other
model included on Type Certificate No. T00001SE to incorporate the same
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to
that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on Boeing 777F airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability and
it affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of
these features on the airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. Therefore, because a delay would
significantly affect the certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment
are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting
these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting comments
to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described
above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type-certification basis for Boeing Model 777F airplanes modified
by the FedEx Express Corporation.
1. Enhanced flight vision system (EFVS) imagery on the head-up
display (HUD) must not degrade the safety of flight or interfere with
the effective use of outside visual references for required pilot tasks
during any phase of flight in which it is to be used.
2. To avoid unacceptable interference with the safe and effective
use of the pilot compartment view, the EFVS device must meet the
following requirements:
a. The EFVS design must minimize unacceptable display
characteristics or
[[Page 21864]]
artifacts (e.g., noise, ``burlap'' overlay, running water droplets)
that obscure the desired image of the scene, impair the pilot's ability
to detect and identify visual references, mask flight hazards, distract
the pilot, or otherwise degrade task performance or safety.
b. Automatic control of EFVS display brightness must be
sufficiently effective, in dynamically changing background (ambient)
lighting conditions, to prevent full or partial blooming of the display
that would distract the pilot, impair the pilot's ability to detect and
identify visual references, mask flight hazards, or otherwise degrade
task performance or safety. If automatic control for image brightness
is not provided, it must be shown that a single manual setting is
satisfactory for the range of lighting conditions encountered during a
time-critical, high-workload phase of flight (e.g., low visibility
instrument approach).
c. A readily accessible control must be provided that permits the
pilot to immediately deactivate and reactivate display of the EFVS
image on demand without removing the pilot's hands from the primary
flight controls (yoke or equivalent) or thrust control.
d. The EFVS image on the HUD must not impair the pilot's use of
guidance information, or degrade the presentation and pilot awareness
of essential flight information displayed on the HUD, such as alerts,
airspeed, attitude, altitude and direction, approach guidance,
windshear guidance, traffic alert and collision avoidance system (TCAS)
resolution advisories, or unusual attitude recovery cues.
e. The EFVS image and the HUD symbols, which are spatially
referenced to the pitch scale, outside view, and image, must be scaled
and aligned (i.e., conformal) to the external scene. In addition, the
EFVS image and the HUD symbols, when considered singly or in
combination, must not be misleading, cause pilot confusion or increase
workload. Airplane attitudes or crosswind conditions may cause certain
symbols (e.g., the zero-pitch line or flight path vector) to reach
field-of-view limits such that they cannot be positioned conformally
with the image and external scene. In such cases, these symbols may be
displayed but with an altered appearance, which makes the pilot aware
that they are no longer displayed conformally (for example,
``ghosting'').
f. A HUD system used to display EFVS images must, if previously
certified, continue to meet all of the requirements of the original
approval.
3. The safety and performance of the pilot tasks associated with
the use of the pilot compartment view must not be degraded by the
display of the EFVS image. Pilot tasks that must not be degraded by the
EFVS image include:
a. Detection, accurate identification, and maneuvering, as
necessary, to avoid traffic, terrain, obstacles, and other hazards of
flight.
b. Accurate identification and utilization of visual references
required for every task relevant to the phase of flight.
4. Use of EFVS for instrument approach operations must be in
accordance with the provisions of Sec. 91.175(l) and (m) and Sec.
121.651 where applicable. Appropriate limitations must be stated in the
operating limitations section of the airplane flight manual to prohibit
the use of the EFVS for functions that have not been found to be
acceptable.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 22, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-8739 Filed 4-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P