Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plan for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard; Arizona, 21690-21702 [2012-8729]
Download as PDF
21690
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(5) Durum wheat, Soft Red Winter
wheat, and Unclassed wheat in the class
Hard White wheat.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 810.2204
for wheat.
3. Amend § 810.2204 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Grades and grade requirements
(a) Grades and grade requirements for
all classes of wheat, except Mixed
wheat.
GRADES AND GRADE REQUIREMENTS
Grades U.S. Nos.
Grading factors
1
2
3
4
5
Minimum pound limits of
Test weight per bushel:
Hard Red Spring wheat or White Club wheat ..................................
All other classes and subclasses .....................................................
58.0
60.0
57.0
58.0
55.0
56.0
53.0
54.0
50.0
51.0
0.2
4.0
0.7
4.0
5.0
2.0
5.0
0.1
0.5
7.0
1.3
8.0
8.0
3.0
10.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
3.0
12.0
12.0
10.0
10.0
0.1
3.0
15.0
5.0
20.0
20.0
10.0
10.0
0.1
1
1
2
0
3
3
4
31
1
1
2
0
3
3
4
31
1
1
2
0
3
3
4
31
1
1
2
0
3
3
4
31
Maximum percent limits of
Defects:
Damaged kernels
Heat (part of total) .....................................................................
Total ...........................................................................................
Foreign material .......................................................................................
Shrunken and broken kernels ..................................................................
Total 1 .......................................................................................................
Wheat of other classes 2 ..........................................................................
Contrasting classes .................................................................................
Total 3 .......................................................................................................
Stones
0.2
2.0
0.4
2.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
0.1
Maximum count limits of
Other material in one kilogram:
Animal filth ........................................................................................
Castor beans ....................................................................................
Crotalaria seeds ................................................................................
Glass .................................................................................................
Stones ...............................................................................................
Unknown foreign substances ...........................................................
Total 4 ................................................................................................
Insect-damaged kernels in 100 grams .............................................
1
1
2
0
3
3
4
31
U.S. Sample grade is Wheat that:
(a) Does not meet the requirements for U.S. Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5; or
(b) Has a musty, sour, or commercially objectionable foreign odor (except smut or garlic odor) or
(c) Is heating or of distinctly low quality.
1 Includes
damaged kernels (total), foreign material, shrunken and broken kernels.
wheat of any grade may contain not more than 10.0 percent of wheat of other classes.
3 Includes contrasting classes.
4 Includes any combination of animal filth, castor beans, crotalaria seeds, glass, stones, or unknown foreign substance.
2 Unclassed
*
*
*
*
*
Alan R. Christian,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–8663 Filed 4–10–12; 8:45 am]
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0253; FRL–9658–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plan for 1997
8-Hour Ozone Standard; Arizona
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Arizona state
implementation plan (SIP) that
demonstrate attainment of the 1997
8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards in the Phoenix-Mesa
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
nonattainment area by June 15, 2009.
These SIP revisions are the 2007 Ozone
Plan developed by the Maricopa
Association of Governments and
adopted and submitted to EPA by the
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality on June 13, 2007. EPA is
proposing to approve the 2007 Ozone
Plan based on our determination that
the plan contains all the provisions
required for areas classified as
nonattainment under Part D, Subpart 1
of the Clean Air Act, including the
demonstration of reasonably available
control measures (RACM), reasonable
further progress (RFP), emission
inventories, transportation conformity
motor vehicle emission budgets for
2008, and contingency measures to be
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
implemented if the Phoenix-Mesa
nonattainment area fails to attain by
June 15, 2009.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before May 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2012–0253, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions.
• Email: lee.anita@epa.gov.
• Mail or deliver: Marty Robin, Office
of Air Planning (AIR–2), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov.,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send
email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
comment. If EPA cannot read your
comments due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically on
the www.regulations.gov Web site and
in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105. While all documents
in the docket are listed in the index,
some documents may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material), and some
may not be publicly available at either
location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
below. Copies of the SIP materials are
also available for inspection at the
following location:
• Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality, 1110 W.
Washington Street, First Floor, Phoenix,
AZ 85007, Phone: (602) 771–2217.
The SIP materials are also
electronically available at: https://
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
www.azmag.gov/Projects/
Project.asp?CMSID2=1120.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anita Lee, Air Planning Office (AIR–2),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region IX, (415) 972–3958,
lee.anita@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. The 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard and the
Phoenix-Mesa Ozone Nonattainment
Area
A. Background on the 1997 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS
B. The Phoenix-Mesa 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area
II. CAA and Regulatory Requirements for
1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
SIPs
III. Arizona’s State Implementation Plan
Submittal To Address Ozone Attainment
in the Phoenix-Mesa Nonattainment
Area
A. Arizona’s SIP Submittal
B. CAA Procedural and Administrative
Requirements for SIP Submittals
IV. Review of the 2007 Ozone Plan for
Phoenix-Mesa
A. Emission Inventories
B. Reasonably Available Control Measures
Demonstration and Control Strategy
C. Attainment Demonstration
D. Reasonable Further Progress
Demonstration
E. Contingency Measures
F. Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for
Transportation Conformity
V. EPA’s Proposed Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Throughout this document, ‘‘we’’,
‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
I. The 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard and
the Phoenix-Mesa Ozone
Nonattainment Area
A. Background on the 1997 8-Hour
Ozone NAAQS
Ground-level ozone pollution is
formed in the atmosphere from the
reaction of volatile organic compounds
(VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in
the presence of sunlight. These two
pollutants, referred to as ozone
precursors, are emitted by many types of
pollution sources including on- and offroad motor vehicles and engines, power
plants and industrial facilities, and
smaller area sources such as lawn and
garden equipment and paints.
Scientific evidence indicates that
adverse public health effects occur
following exposure to ozone,
particularly in children and adults with
lung disease. Breathing air containing
ozone can reduce lung function and
inflame airways, which can increase
respiratory symptoms and aggravate
asthma or other lung diseases. Ozone
exposure also has been associated with
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21691
increased susceptibility to respiratory
infections, medication use, doctor visits,
and emergency department visits and
hospital admissions for individuals with
lung disease. Ozone exposure also
increases the risk of premature death
from heart or lung disease. Children are
at increased risk from exposure to ozone
because their lungs are still developing
and they are more likely to be active
outdoors, which increases exposure. See
‘‘Fact Sheet, Proposal to Revise the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
for Ozone’’, January 6, 2010 and 75 FR
2938 (January 19, 2010).
On July 18, 1997, EPA revised the
primary and secondary national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQS or
standard) for ozone to replace the
existing 1-hour ozone standard of 0.12
parts per million (ppm) with an 8-hour
standard of 0.08 ppm 1 (62 FR 33856).
EPA revised the ozone standard after
considering substantial evidence from
numerous health studies demonstrating
that serious health effects are associated
with exposures to ozone concentrations
above the levels of these revised
standards.
B. The Phoenix-Mesa 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area
Following promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS, EPA is required by
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 107(d) to
designate areas throughout the nation as
attaining or not attaining the NAAQS.
Under the implementation rule for the
1997 8-hour ozone standard, EPA
designated certain areas as
nonattainment under title I, part D,
subpart 1 of the CAA (subpart 1) if the
area’s 1-hour ozone design value was
above the level of the standard but
below 0.121 ppm. On April 15, 2004,
EPA designated Phoenix-Mesa as
‘‘Subpart 1’’ nonattainment for the 1997
8-hour ozone standard under CAA
section 172. See 69 FR 23858 (April 30,
2004) and 40 CFR 81.303. The
designation became effective on June 15,
2004. Under part D, subpart 1 of the Act,
states must submit plans to come into
attainment within 3 years of the
effective date of the nonattainment
designation, and must attain the
standard as expeditiously as practicable,
but no later than 5 years after the
effective date of the designation.
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) submitted the 2007
Attainment Plan to EPA on June 13,
1 In March 2008, EPA completed another review
of the primary and secondary ozone standards and
further tightened the standards by lowering the
level for both to 0.075 ppm (73 FR 16436, Mar. 27,
2008).
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
21692
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2007 2 to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard by the attainment date of June
15, 2009, which is 5 years after the
effective date of the area’s designation
as nonattainment.3
In June 2007, the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court) vacated the
portion of the 2004 ozone
implementation rule that allowed areas
to be classified under subpart 1. See
South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. v.
EPA, 472 F. 3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006),
reh’g denied 489 F.3d 1245 (SCAQMD)
(vacating certain elements of EPA’s
Phase 1 ozone implementation rule). On
January 16, 2009 (74 FR 2936), EPA
published a proposed rule to address,
among other issues, the DC Circuit
Court vacatur of the classification
system that EPA used to designate a
subset of initial 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment areas under subpart 1. In
that rulemaking, EPA proposed that all
areas designated nonattainment for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS under
subpart 1 would be classified as subpart
2 areas (hereafter referred to as the
Subpart 1/Subpart 2 Rulemaking). The
Phoenix-Mesa area is included in the
areas that would be classified under
subpart 2 if EPA’s proposal is finalized.
EPA has not yet taken final action on
the Subpart 1/Subpart 2 Rulemaking.
Following completion of the Subpart 1/
Subpart 2 Rulemaking, EPA will address
in a future rulemaking any additional
requirements that become applicable to
Phoenix-Mesa, if any, as a result of its
classification under subpart 2. If, after
Phoenix-Mesa is classified under
subpart 2, EPA determines in a future
rulemaking that the area is in attainment
with the 1997 8-hour ozone standard,
then the obligation to submit certain
planning SIPs related to attainment of
the 1997 8-hour ozone standard
pursuant to its subpart 2 classification
would be suspended in accordance with
40 CFR 51.918.
The Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment
area is located in the central portion of
Arizona and encompasses 4,880 square
2 Letter from Stephen A. Owens, Director,
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality to
Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, dated
June 13, 2007, plus three enclosures, including the
‘‘Eight-Hour Ozone Plan for the Maricopa
Nonattainment Area, dated June 2007’’ and
Appendices Volumes one and two, dated June 2007.
3 On March 23, 2009, ADEQ submitted to EPA a
redesignation request and maintenance plan for
Phoenix-Mesa for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard
based on ambient ozone monitoring data for the
2006–2008 period. EPA has not yet acted on this
submittal. The maintenance plan and redesignation
request are available from the Maricopa Association
of Governments at: https://www.azmag.gov/Projects/
Project.asp?CMSID2=1120&MID=Environmental
%20Programs.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
miles, including the urban portions of
Maricopa and Pinal Counties, the Fort
McDowell Yavapai Nation and the Salt
River-Pima Maricopa Indian
Community. For a precise description of
the geographic boundaries of the
Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area, see
40 CFR 81.303. The Maricopa
Association of Governments (MAG) is
the agency with primary responsibility
for developing the plan to attain the
1997 8-hour ozone standard for
Phoenix-Mesa.
Ambient 8-hour ozone concentrations
in Phoenix-Mesa vary depending on
location and season, with the highest
values generally occurring in May–
September, in north Phoenix or the air
quality monitors located in the
mountainous northeastern region of the
Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area.
Ozone design values 4 from PhoenixMesa that exceeded the 1997 8-hour
standard of 0.08 parts per million 5
(ppm) ranged from 0.085 ppm (for the
2000–2002, 2001–2003, and 2003–2005
periods) to 0.088 ppm (for the 1998–
2000 and 1999–2001 periods). The
ozone design values for the PhoenixMesa nonattainment area for the 2004–
2006 period (highest design value was
0.083 ppm) and years thereafter were at
or below the standard. See EPA Air
Quality System (AQS) data available in
the docket for this proposed rulemaking
and Table 3 below.
II. CAA and Regulatory Requirements
for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment
Area SIPs
Each area designated nonattainment
for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard is
subject to, at minimum, the general
requirements for nonattainment area
plans in subpart 1 of part D, title I of the
CAA. Subpart 2 of part D contains more
detailed requirements for ozone
nonattainment areas classified under
this subpart. The Phoenix-Mesa ozone
nonattainment area is not currently
classified under subpart 2.6 EPA has
proposed to classify the Phoenix-Mesa
area under subpart 2 as ‘‘marginal’’
nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS (see 74 FR 2936 at 2944,
January 16, 2009) but has not yet
4 A design value is an ambient concentration
calculated using a specific methodology to evaluate
monitored air quality data and is used to determine
whether an area’s air quality meets a NAAQS. The
methodology for calculating design values for the 8hour ozone NAAQS is found in 40 CFR part 50,
Appendix I.
5 Based on the rounding conventions described in
40 CFR part 50, Appendix I, a design value of 0.085
ppm is the lowest value that exceeds the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS of 0.08 ppm.
6 EPA now refers to these areas as ‘‘former subpart
1’’ nonattainment areas in light of the SCAQMD
decision.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
completed this rulemaking. Although a
future final decision by EPA to classify
the Phoenix-Mesa area under subpart 2
may trigger additional future
requirements for the area, EPA believes
that this does not prevent EPA from
proposing or ultimately finalizing our
action on the 2007 Ozone Plan in
accordance with the subpart 1
requirements that currently apply to the
area.7 Thus, for purposes of evaluating
the 2007 Ozone Plan, we are reviewing
it for consistency with the applicable
requirements of part D, title I of the Act,
which are contained in sections
172(c)(1)–(9).8
In order to assist states in developing
effective plans to attain the ozone
standard, EPA issued the 8-hour ozone
implementation rule. This rule was
finalized in two phases. The first phase
of the rule addresses classifications for
the 1997 8-hour ozone standard,
applicable attainment dates for the
various classifications, and the timing of
emissions reductions needed for
attainment. See 69 FR 23951 (April 30,
2004). The second phase addresses SIP
submittal dates and the requirements for
reasonably available control technology
and measures (RACT and RACM),
reasonable further progress (RFP)
demonstration, modeling and
attainment demonstrations, contingency
measures, and new source review. See
70 FR 71612 (November 29, 2005). The
rule is codified at 40 CFR part 51,
subpart X.9 We discuss each of the
applicable CAA and regulatory
requirements for 8-hour ozone
nonattainment plans in more detail
below.
III. Arizona’s State Implementation
Plan Submittal To Address Ozone
Attainment in the Phoenix-Mesa
Nonattainment Area
A. Arizona’s SIP Submittal
On June 13, 2007, the Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ) submitted the ‘‘Eight-Hour
7 EPA is currently obligated under the terms of a
Consent Decree to take final action on the 2007
Ozone Plan by May 31, 2012. See WildEarth
Guardians v. Jackson, Case No. 4:11–cv–02205–SI
(N.D. CA).
8 Although the DC Circuit Court in SCAQMD
rejected EPA’s rationale for implementing the 1997
8-hour ozone standard in certain nonattainment
areas solely under subpart 1, EPA does not believe
that the Court’s ruling in this case alters any subpart
1 requirements that currently apply to the 2007
Ozone Plan.
9 EPA has revised or proposed to revise several
elements of the 8-hour ozone implementation rule
since its initial promulgation in 2004. See, e.g., 74
FR 2936 (January 16, 2009); 75 FR 51960 (August
24, 2010); and 75 FR 80420 (December 22, 2010).
None of these revisions affect any provision of the
rule that is applicable to our proposed action today
on the Phoenix-Mesa 2007 8-hour Ozone SIP.
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Ozone Plan for the Maricopa
Nonattainment Area’’ (2007 Ozone Plan)
to EPA as a revision to the Arizona SIP.
The plan was deemed complete by
operation of law on December 13, 2007.
MAG developed the 2007 Ozone Plan
and the MAG Regional Council
Executive Committee adopted the plan
on June 11, 2007. ADEQ adopted the
plan on June 13, 2007.10 The 2007
Ozone Plan contains complete emission
inventories for ozone precursors for
2002 and 2008, photochemical
modeling to demonstrate that the
standard will be attained in 2008
through the continued implementation
of federal, state, and local control
measures, motor vehicle emission
budgets (MVEBs) used for transportation
conformity, and descriptions of the
State’s compliance with CAA
requirements for ‘‘Subpart 1’’ ozone
nonattainment areas. We are proposing
to approve the 2007 Ozone Plan for the
Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area.
receipt. This section also provides that
any plan submittal that EPA has not
affirmatively determined to be complete
or incomplete will be deemed complete
by operation of law six months after the
date of submittal. EPA’s SIP
completeness criteria are found in 40
CFR part 51, Appendix V. The 2007
Ozone Plan, submitted by ADEQ on
June 13, 2007, was deemed complete by
operation of law on December 13, 2007.
IV. Review of the 2007 Ozone Plan for
Phoenix-Mesa
EPA evaluated the 2007 Ozone Plan
according to the general subpart 1
nonattainment plan requirements
contained in section 172(c) of the Act.
A. Emission Inventories
B. CAA Procedural and Administrative
Requirements for SIP Submittals
CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) and
110(l) require a state to provide
reasonable public notice and
opportunity for public hearing prior to
the adoption and submittal of a SIP or
SIP revision. To meet this requirement,
every SIP submittal should include
evidence that adequate public notice
was given and an opportunity for a
public hearing was provided consistent
with EPA’s implementing regulations in
40 CFR 51.102.
MAG has satisfied the applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
for reasonable public notice and hearing
prior to adoption and submittal of the
2007 Ozone Plan. MAG and ADEQ
jointly held two public hearings on June
1, 2007 and June 4, 2007. As evidence
of notification of public hearings
consistent with 40 CFR 51.102, the SIP
submittal includes proof of newspaper
publication and copies of letters sent to
EPA and affected federal, state, and
local agencies notifying interested
parties of the joint MAG and ADEQ
public hearings. We find, therefore, that
the 2007 Ozone Plan submittal meets
the procedural requirements for public
notice and hearing in sections 110(a)
and 110(l) of the CAA.
CAA section 110(k)(1)(B) requires
EPA to determine whether a SIP
submittal is complete within 60 days of
1. Requirements for Emissions
Inventories
CAA section 172(c)(3) requires each
state with an ozone nonattainment area
to submit plan provisions that include
a ‘‘comprehensive, accurate, current
inventory of actual emissions from all
sources of the relevant pollutant or
pollutants in such area, including such
periodic revisions as the Administrator
may determine necessary to assure that
the requirements of this part are met’’.
EPA has issued the ‘‘Emissions
Inventory Guidance for Implementation
of Ozone and Particulate Matter
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and Regional Haze
Regulations’’ (EI Guidance),11 which
provides guidance on how to develop
base year and future year baseline
emission inventories for 8-hour ozone,
PM2.5, and regional haze SIPs. For areas
designated nonattainment for the 8-hour
ozone standard in 2004, EPA
recommends using calendar year 2002
as the base year for the inventory. EI
Guidance, p. 8.
Emissions inventories for ozone
should include emissions of VOC, NOX
and carbon monoxide (CO) and
represent an average summer week day
during the ozone season. See EI
Guidance, pp. 14 and 17. States should
include documentation in their
submittals explaining how the
emissions data were calculated. See 70
FR 71612 (Nov. 29, 2005) and EI
Guidance p. 40. In estimating mobile
source emissions, states should use the
latest emissions models and planning
assumptions available at the time the
SIP is developed. See 68 FR 32802 (June
10 Letter from Stephen A. Owens, Director of
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, to
Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX,
‘‘Submittal of the Eight-Hour Ozone Plan for the
Maricopa County Nonattainment Area’’. June 13,
2007.
11 ‘‘Emissions Inventory Guidance for
Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
and Regional Haze Regulations’’, EPA–454/R–05–
001, November 2005. This document is available at:
https://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/eidocs/eiguid/
index.html.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21693
2, 2003) and 70 FR 71612 (Nov. 29,
2005).
2. Emission Inventories in the 2007
8-Hour Ozone Plan
The base year and future year baseline
inventories for NOX, CO and VOC for
the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area,
together with additional documentation
for the inventories, are found in Volume
1 of the Appendices to the 2007 Ozone
Plan.12 These inventories represent
average summer day (ozone season)
emissions. A base year inventory is
provided for 2002 and the projected
baseline inventory is provided for the
attainment year of 2008.13 All
inventories include NOX, CO, and VOC
emissions from point, area, nonroad
mobile, and onroad mobile sources,
except that biogenic emission
inventories include only NOX and VOC
emissions.
The 2002 Periodic Emission Inventory
(PEI) emissions estimates for Maricopa
County and the Phoenix-Mesa
nonattainment area, which provided the
basis for the 2002 base year inventory,
were calculated in terms of annual
emissions and ozone season-day
emissions. Emissions from point sources
were estimated from each identified
facility through permit system databases
and annual emission reports submitted
to the facility’s permitting authority.
Emissions from area sources were
estimated by source category using
information from permit databases and
previous SIP inventories. Nonroad
mobile source emissions were estimated
with the EPA NONROAD 2002 model
and onroad mobile source emissions
were estimated from emission factors for
various vehicle classes from MOBILE6.2
combined with estimates of vehicle
miles traveled (VMT) using data
submitted by the Arizona Department of
Transportation to the U.S. Department
of Transportation’s Federal Highway
Administration for the 2002 Highway
Performance and Monitoring System.
Biogenic emissions of NOX and VOC
were calculated using MAGBEIS2, a
modified version of the UAM–BEIS2
model developed specifically for use in
Maricopa County, based on land use
12 By ‘‘future year baseline inventories’’ or
‘‘projected baseline inventories’’, we mean
projected emission inventories for future years that
account for, among other things, the ongoing effects
of economic growth and adopted emission control
requirements.
13 EPA’s ozone implementation rule defines
‘‘attainment year ozone season’’ as ‘‘the ozone
season immediately preceding a nonattainment
area’s attainment date.’’ 40 CFR 51.900(g). Because
the attainment date for Phoenix-Mesa is June 15,
2009, we refer to 2008 as the attainment year, and
the 2008 ozone season as the ‘‘attainment year
ozone season.’’
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
21694
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
information, surface temperature data,
and emission factors for land use
categories. See 2002 Periodic Emissions
Inventory for Ozone Precursors, June
2004 in Volume 1 of the Appendices to
the 2007 Ozone Plan.
Ozone precursor emissions from
point, area, onroad, and nonroad
sources used in the modeling domain
(Table 1) were developed from the
Comprehensive Air Quality Model with
Extensions (CAMx), version 4.40, and
the Emissions Preprocessor System
(EPS3.0), based on the 2002 Periodic
Emission Inventory for the three ozone
episodes modeled for 2002. Biogenic
VOC emission estimates used for the
2002 modeling domain (e.g., 451.3
metric tons per day in the June 2002
ozone episode) are significantly higher
than biogenic VOC emissions estimated
in the 2002 PEI (e.g., 41.7 metric tons
per ozone season day). Section III of
Appendix A, Exhibit 2 of the 2007
Ozone Plan describes the method used
to estimate biogenic emissions for the
modeling domain. MAG used a model
developed in 2005, called Model of
Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from
Nature (MEGAN), that was determined
to be more reliable and accurate for
Maricopa County because it relies on
local field studies that identified
dominant plant species and emission
factors, as well as locations and biomass
densities, to estimate biogenic emissions
of ozone precursors. In the 2002 base
year inventory, biogenic sources
contributed 65 percent to total VOC
emissions. In contrast, anthropogenic
onroad mobile sources dominated the
total NOX emissions and accounted for
63 percent of total NOX. See Tables
5–3 and 5–4 of the 2007 Ozone Plan.
The 2002 inventory was projected to
2008 by accounting for expected growth
factors, ongoing control programs, and
retirement rates for obsolete sources of
emissions. MAG accounted for known
projects in 2008 (e.g., the Phoenix
Expansion Project of the Transwestern
Pipeline Company) and additionally
applied a five percent increase to
onroad mobile source emissions of NOX
and a three percent increase to all other
anthropogenic emissions of VOC and
NOX. The three percent increase was
based on population projections
prepared by the Arizona Department of
Economic Security, based on a 2005
special census in Maricopa County.
MAG applied the five percent increase
to onroad mobile source emissions of
NOX to create a safety margin for
transportation conformity. See 2007
Ozone Plan, p. 5–5, and Appendices to
Ozone Plan, Volume 1.
For biogenic emissions, the 2002
inventory was held constant for 2008. In
additional information provided to EPA,
MAG explained that no projected land
use or land cover data was available for
the 2008 attainment year, therefore
biogenic emissions in the ozone
modeling domain were held constant.14
In the approved 1-hour ozone
maintenance plan, MAG projected an
increase in VOC emissions from the
Phoenix Metropolitan nonattainment
area due to changes in land use, i.e.,
increasing urbanization and residential
land use and decreasing use of land for
agriculture. See 70 FR 13425 (Mar. 21,
2005). The 1-hour ozone maintenance
plan relied on MAGBEIS2 to estimate
biogenic emissions from the
nonattainment area and modeling
domain.15 As shown in the additional
information provided by MAG on
February 8, 2012, the MAGBEIS2 VOC
emission factor for urbanized land use
is greater than the VOC emission factor
for agricultural land use, therefore,
based on the projected increased
urbanization in the 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area, VOC emissions
projected by MAGBEIS2 increased from
the 1999 base year to the 2015
maintenance year. In contrast, as
described above, the 2007 8-hour ozone
plan relied on a new biogenic emissions
model (MEGAN) that is more
representative of Maricopa County and
its desert environment. The additional
information provided by MAG shows
the urbanized land use emission factors
from MEGAN are lower than emission
factors associated with agriculture or
other undeveloped desert landscapes in
Maricopa County. Therefore, using
MEGAN, MAG expects that the trend of
increasing urbanization (as projected in
the 1-hour ozone maintenance plan) is
expected to decrease VOC emissions
from Maricopa County. Because MAG
did not have 2008 land use data
available, it determined that
maintaining constant biogenic
emissions of the ozone precursors
would be more conservative than
attempting to estimate the anticipated
decrease in biogenic VOC emissions.16
TABLE 1—EMISSION INVENTORIES FOR THE PHOENIX-MESA MODELING DOMAIN FOR JUNE OZONE EPISODE
[Metric tons per day]
NOX
VOC
2002
2008
2002
2008
Point .................................................................................................................................................
Area .................................................................................................................................................
Nonroad Mobile ...............................................................................................................................
Onroad Mobile .................................................................................................................................
Biogenics .........................................................................................................................................
11.15
9.79
79.97
182.36
8.56
32.78
13.49
86.58
145.52
8.56
11.72
90.56
50.73
91.84
451.28
13.55
105.03
57.55
72.34
451.28
Total ..........................................................................................................................................
291.82
286.93
696.13
699.75
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Source: 2007 Ozone Plan at Tables 5–3 and 5–4.
3. Proposed Action on the Emission
Inventories
We have reviewed the 2002 base year
inventory and the inventory
methodologies used in the 2007 Ozone
Plan and believe that the inventory was
developed consistent with the CAA
14 Email from Cathy Arthur, MAG, to Anita Lee,
EPA, re: ‘‘Biogenic VOCs’’ on February 8, 2012, plus
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
requirements as reflected in the 8-hour
ozone implementation rule and EPA’s
guidance. The 2002 base year inventory
is a comprehensive inventory of actual
emissions of ozone precursors in the
Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area. We
therefore propose to approve the base
two attachments on land use boundaries and
emission factors.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
year inventory as meeting the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3)
and EPA’s 8-hour ozone implementation
rule.
15 Ibid.
16 Ibid.
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
21695
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
B. Reasonably Available Control
Measures Demonstration and Control
Strategy
1. Requirements for RACM and Control
Strategies
CAA Section 172(c)(1) requires that
each attainment plan ‘‘provide for the
implementation of all reasonably
available control measures as
expeditiously as practicable (including
such reductions in emissions from
existing sources in the area as may be
obtained through the adoption, at a
minimum, of reasonable available
control technology), and shall provide
for attainment of the national primary
ambient air quality standards.’’ The 8hour ozone implementation rule
requires that for each nonattainment
area that is required to submit an
attainment demonstration, the state
must also submit concurrently a SIP
revision demonstrating that it has
adopted all RACM necessary to
demonstrate attainment as expeditiously
as practicable and to meet any RFP
requirements. 40 CFR 51.912(d).
EPA has previously provided
guidance interpreting the RACM
requirement in the General Preamble at
13560 17 and in a memorandum entitled
‘‘Guidance on the Reasonably Available
Control Measure Requirement and
Attainment Demonstration Submissions
for Ozone Nonattainment Areas’’, John
Seitz, Director, OAQPS to Regional Air
Directors, November 30, 1999 (Seitz
memo). In summary, EPA guidance
provides that, to address the
requirement to adopt all RACM, states
should consider all potentially
reasonable control measures for source
categories in the nonattainment area to
determine whether they are reasonably
available for implementation in that
area and whether they would, if
implemented individually or
collectively, advance the area’s
attainment date by one year or more.
See Seitz memo and General Preamble
at 13560.18 Any measures that are
necessary to meet these requirements
that are not already either federally
promulgated, part of the state’s SIP, or
otherwise creditable in SIPs must be
submitted in enforceable form as part of
a state’s attainment plan for the area.
CAA section 172(c)(6) requires
nonattainment plans to ‘‘include
enforceable emission limitation, and
such other control measures, means, or
techniques (including economic
incentives such as fees, marketable
permits, and actions of emission rights),
as well as schedules and timetables for
compliance, as may be necessary or
appropriate to provide for attainment of
such standard in such area by the
applicable attainment date * * *.’’ See
also CAA section 110(a)(2)(A). The
ozone implementation rule requires that
all control measures needed for
attainment be implemented no later
than the beginning of the attainment
year ozone season. See 40 CFR
51.908(d). The attainment year ozone
season is defined as the ozone season
immediately preceding a nonattainment
area’s attainment date. See 40 CFR
51.900(g).
2. RACM Demonstration and the Control
Strategy in the 2007 Ozone Plan
The attainment demonstration for the
Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area,
which we discuss further in section
IV.D of this document, shows that
implementation of all of the measures
identified as RACM for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS would enable the
Phoenix-Mesa area to attain the 1997
8-hour ozone standard during the 2008
ozone season, preceding the 2009
attainment date for the area. EPA
previously approved all of the key NOX
and VOC control measures, including
several dozen VOC RACT rules, as part
of Arizona’s plans for attaining and
maintaining the 1-hour ozone standard
in Phoenix-Mesa.19 The 2007 Ozone
Plan specifically relies on seven of these
control measures to demonstrate
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard by June 15, 2009, and provides
for implementation of these measures by
the beginning of the attainment year
ozone season (January 2008), consistent
with the requirements of 40 CFR
51.908(d). See 2007 Ozone Plan at pp.
4–2 through 4–7.20 We discuss below
the seven measures that the attainment
demonstration in the 2007 Ozone Plan
relied on to reduce emissions of VOC
and/or NOX (see Table 2). Emission
reductions associated with each
measure were estimated for the June
2008 ozone episode modeled for the
attainment demonstration. Of these
seven measures, phased-in emission test
cutpoints and the development of
intelligent transportation systems
resulted in the greatest reduction in
VOC emissions, and the summer fuel
reformulation resulted in the greatest
reduction in NOX emissions.
TABLE 2—2008 EMISSION REDUCTIONS FROM ‘‘ATTAINMENT MEASURES’’
VOC
Metric ton/day
reduction
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Summer Fuel Reformulation ..........................................................................
Phased-in Emission Test Cutpoints ..............................................................
One Time Waiver from Vehicle Emissions Test ............................................
Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems ................................................................
Develop Intelligent Transportation Systems ..................................................
Tougher Enforcement of Vehicle Registration and Emission Test Compliance ............................................................................................................
17 The ‘‘General Preamble for the Implementation
of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990’’, published at 57 FR 13498 on April 16, 1992,
describes EPA’s preliminary view on how we
would interpret various SIP planning provisions in
title I of the CAA as amended in 1990, including
those planning provisions applicable to the 1-hour
ozone standard. EPA continues to rely on certain
guidance in the General Preamble to implement the
8-hour ozone standard under title I.
18 See also ‘‘State Implementation Plans; General
Preamble for Proposed Rulemaking on Approval of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
% Change
compared to
2008 base
case
1 (0.1)
1 <0.1
Metric ton/day
reduction
% Change
compared to
2008 base
case
3.1
0.1
<0.1
2.2
1.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.9
10.3
2.6
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
3.5
0.9
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.2
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
Plan Revisions for Nonattainment Areas’’, 44 FR
20372 (April 4, 1979), and Memorandum dated
December 14, 2000 from John S. Seitz, Director,
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
‘‘Additional Submission on RACM from States with
Severe One-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area SIPs’’.
19 See, e.g., 2007 Ozone Plan at Table 1–1; 68 FR
2912 (January 22, 2003); 69 FR 10161 (March 4,
2004); 70 FR 30370 (May 26, 2005); 70 FR 13425
(March 21, 2005) (proposed redesignation of
Phoenix to attainment for the 1-hour standard) and
70 FR 34362 (June 14, 2005) (final redesignation).
PO 00000
NOX
RACT rules for NOX were not required for purposes
of attaining and maintaining the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS in Phoenix-Mesa because EPA approved a
petition for NOX exemption for this purpose. 60 FR
19510 (April 19, 1995).
20 The 2007 Ozone Plan refers to these seven
control measures as ‘‘attainment measures,’’ to be
distinguished from ‘‘baseline measures,’’ which
were taken into account in the base year and
projection year emission inventories. See 2007
Ozone Plan at 4–2 and Volume 1 of the Appendices
to the 2007 Ozone Plan at Table III–1.
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
21696
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—2008 EMISSION REDUCTIONS FROM ‘‘ATTAINMENT MEASURES’’—Continued
VOC
Metric ton/day
reduction
NOX
% Change
compared to
2008 base
case
Metric ton/day
reduction
% Change
compared to
2008 base
case
Rule 358: Polystyrene Foam Operations ......................................................
0.5
0.2
N/A
N/A
Total ........................................................................................................
6.0
2.4
13.4
4.6
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Source: 2007 Ozone Plan at Table 5–2.
1 Increase.
a. Summer Fuel Reformulation
The 2007 Ozone Plan relies on H.B.
2307, a Cleaner Burning Gasoline (CBG)
program passed by the Arizona
Legislature in 1997. The CBG program
contains requirements related to
seasonal changes in gasoline
formulation related to vapor pressure
and oxygen content. Typically, fuel
reformulation measures are designed to
reduce summertime evaporative VOC
emissions. However, the results of
MAG’s emissions modeling analyses
suggest that the summer reformulation
measure would increase VOC emissions
slightly and significantly reduce
emissions of NOX. In Volume 2 of the
Appendices to the 2007 Ozone Plan, in
response to EPA comments, MAG
explains that the slight increase in
projected VOC emissions from the
summer fuel reformulation measure
occurred because the MOBILE6.2 input
for the measure specified a Reid vapor
pressure (RVP) of 7.0 pounds per square
inch (psi). Actual fuel specifications for
the 2002 base case used actual fuel
specifications from the Arizona
Department of Weights and Measures
that were lower than 7.0 psi. The
projected decrease in NOX emissions in
2008 from the summer fuel
reformulation measure is a result of the
removal of the summertime (April 1
through November 1) minimum oxygen
content standard for Type 1 gasoline.
Oxygenates in fuel are used to improve
combustion as a control strategy for CO
and other products of incomplete
combustion, for example unburned
VOCs; however improved combustion
also tends to increase formation of NOX.
Therefore, removal of the minimum
summertime oxygenate standard is
projected to reduce formation of NOX.
See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4–2, 4–3.
b. Phased-in Emission Test Cutpoints
The 2007 Ozone Plan describes two
measures passed by the Arizona
Legislature that comprise this
attainment measure: H.B. 2237, passed
in 1997, that appropriates funds from
the State General Fund to develop and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
implement an alternative test protocol
to reduce false failure rates associated
with the more stringent standards for
the Vehicle Emissions Testing Program,
and S.B. 1427, which requires vehicles
in certain areas to be emission tested
and requires owners of the newest five
model year vehicles to be exempt from
testing but to pay an in lieu fee that is
deposited into the Arizona Clean Air
Fund, effective December 31, 1998.
Using MOBILE6.2, MAG estimated that
this measure reduces NOX emissions by
2.6 metric tons per day in the June 2008
ozone episode and VOC emissions by
3.1 metric tons per day. See 2007 Ozone
Plan at 4–3, 4–4.
c. One Time Waiver From Vehicle
Emissions Test
The Arizona Legislature passed S.B.
1002 which limits issuance of a waiver
for failure to comply with emission
testing requirements to one-time only,
effective January 1, 1997. MAG modeled
this measure in MOBILE6.2 by adjusting
the percentage of waivers allowed and
estimated that this measure reduces
NOX emissions by less than 0.1 metric
tons per day in the June 2008 ozone
episode and VOC emissions by 0.1
metric tons per day. See 2007 Ozone
Plan at 4–4.
d. Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems
House Bill 2237 passed by the
Arizona Legislature contains
appropriations for fiscal years 1997–
1998 and 1998–1999 to Arizona
Department of Transportation for
distribution to cities and counties for
synchronization of traffic signals within
and across jurisdictional boundaries.
MAG modeled this measure in
MOBILE6.2 by adjusting the input for
idling time at traffic signals and
estimated that this measure reduces
NOX emissions by less than 0.1 metric
tons per day in the June 2008 ozone
episode and VOC emissions by less than
0.1 metric tons per day. See 2007 Ozone
Plan at 4–4, 4–5.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
e. Develop Intelligent Transportation
Systems
The 2007 Ozone Plan cites three
committed control measures in the
1-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan that
serve to reduce traffic congestion:
‘‘Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems’’,
‘‘Develop Intelligent Transportation
Systems’’, and ‘‘Reduce Traffic
Congestion at Major Intersections’’. The
2007 Ozone Plan describes these
measures as technologies implemented
on the local level over fiscal years 2003–
2006 that reduce VOC and NOX
emissions by reducing congestion. MAG
estimated emission reductions from
these measures to be 0.4 metric tons of
NOX per day in the June 2008 ozone
episode and 2.2 metric tons of VOC per
day. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4–5.
f. Tougher Enforcement of Vehicle
Registration and Emission Test
Compliance
The 2007 Ozone Plan cites two
measures from the Arizona Legislature
and a program implemented by the
Arizona Motor Vehicle Division of the
Arizona Department of Transportation
that collectively improve enforcement of
vehicle registration and compliance
with vehicle testing requirements: S.B.
1427 passed in 1998 that requires school
and special districts in certain areas to
prohibit employees who have not
complied with emission testing
requirements from parking in employee
parking lots, and H.B. 2254 passed in
1999 that requires vehicles owned by
federal, state, or political state
subdivisions in Arizona to comply with
A.R.S 49–542. MAG modeled this
measure in MOBILE6.2 by adjusting the
weighting between inspection and
maintenance (I/M) and non-I/M
emission factors, and estimated that this
measure reduces NOX emissions by 0.1
metric tons per day in the June 2008
ozone episode and VOC emissions by
0.2 metric tons per day. See 2007 Ozone
Plan at 4–5, 4–6.
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
g. Maricopa County Rule 358:
Polystyrene Foam Operations
Rule 358 adopted by Maricopa County
on April 20, 2005 limits VOC emissions
from the manufacturing of expandedpolystyrene products. MAG relied on
information provided by the Maricopa
County Air Quality Department that
Rule 358 would result in 80 percent
control effectiveness and 80 percent rule
effectiveness. MAG estimated VOC
emission reductions to be 0.5 metric
tons per day in the June 2008 ozone
episode, with no effect on emissions of
NOX. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4–6, 4–7.
3. Proposed Actions on the RACM
Demonstration and Control Strategy
Based on our review of the RACM
analysis and Arizona’s adopted rules,
we propose to find that the 2007 Ozone
Plan provides for implementation of all
reasonably available control measures
necessary to demonstrate expeditious
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard and to meet any related RFP
requirements in the Phoenix-Mesa
nonattainment area, consistent with the
applicable requirements of CAA section
172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.912.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Attainment Demonstration
1. Requirements for Attainment
Demonstration
CAA section 172(c)(1) requires states
with ozone nonattainment areas to
submit plan provisions that provide for
attainment of the national ambient air
quality standards. See also 40 CFR
51.908. The attainment demonstration
should include:
a. Technical analyses to locate and
identify sources of emissions that are
causing violations of the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS within the nonattainment area;
b. Adopted measures with schedules
for implementation and other means
and techniques necessary and
appropriate for attainment; and
c. Contingency measures required
under section 172(c)(9) of the CAA.
See 70 FR 71612 (Nov. 29, 2005).
The requirements for the first two
items are described in the sections on
emission inventories and RACM/RACT
above (sections IV.A and IV.B) and in
the sections on air quality modeling and
attainment demonstration that follow
immediately below. Requirements for
the third item are described in the
section on contingency measures (IV.F.).
2. Air Quality Modeling in the PhoenixMesa 2007 Ozone Plan
Under EPA’s ozone implementation
rule, an attainment demonstration must
meet the air quality modeling and other
requirements of 40 CFR 51.112 and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
must be supported ‘‘by means of a
photochemical grid model or any other
analytical method determined by [EPA]
to be at least as effective.’’ See 40 CFR
51.908. Air quality modeling is used to
establish attainment emissions targets,
that is, a combination of ozone
precursor emission levels that the area
can accommodate without exceeding
the NAAQS, and to assess whether the
proposed control strategy will result in
attainment of the NAAQS.
Air quality modeling is performed for
a base year and compared to air quality
monitoring data from that year in order
to evaluate model performance. Once
the performance is determined to be
acceptable, future year changes to the
emissions inventory are simulated with
the model to determine the effect of
emissions reductions on ambient air
quality. The procedures for modeling
ozone as part of an attainment
demonstration are contained in EPA’s
‘‘Guidance on the Use of Models and
Other Analyses for Demonstrating
Attainment of Air Quality Goals for the
8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS and
Regional Haze’’ (Guidance). The
Guidance also recommends that
supplemental analyses be performed,
and used in combination with the
modeling in a Weight of Evidence
determination that the control strategy
will result in attainment of the NAAQS.
See Guidance p. 17.
The air quality modeling is described
in Chapter 3 of the 2007 Ozone Plan and
documented in Volume One of the
Appendices to the 2007 Ozone Plan, in
Appendix A, Exhibit 2 (‘‘Modeling
TSD’’). We provide a brief description of
the modeling and a summary of our
evaluation of it below.
MAG performed the air quality
modeling for the 2007 Ozone Plan using
the Comprehensive Air Quality Model
with Extensions (CAMx) photochemical
model, incorporating meteorological
fields from the Mesoscale Model version
5 (MM5). These models have been
extensively used in developing SIP
attainment demonstrations and are
identified in EPA Guidance as candidate
models. See Guidance pp. 139 & 160.
While there was no intensive field study
for this modeling effort, 31 ozone
stations and 56 meteorological stations
provided an ample database of routinely
collected data for use in model
application development and
performance evaluation.
EPA recommends that States prepare
modeling protocols as part of their
modeled attainment demonstrations.
Guidance, p. 133. The Guidance at pp.
133–134 describes the topics to be
addressed in this modeling protocol. A
modeling protocol should detail the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21697
procedures for conducting the modeling
analysis, such as the background and
objectives, the schedule and
organizational structure, selection of
ozone episodes to model, meteorological
and emissions input data preparation,
model performance evaluation,
interpreting modeling results, and
procedures for using the model to
demonstrate whether proposed
strategies are sufficient to attain the
NAAQS. The 2007 Ozone Plan’s
modeling protocol is contained in
Volume Two of the Appendices to the
2007 Plan, in Appendix I-i, and covers
all of the topics recommended in the
Guidance.
A key part of the modeling protocol
is the selection of ozone episodes to be
modeled. An attainment demonstration
that is robust despite natural variability
should include modeling of multiple
days with high ozone concentrations,
spanning the range of meteorological
conditions that lead to exceedances of
the NAAQS in the area. See Guidance
p. 146. Volume two of the Appendices
to the 2007 Ozone Plan, Attachment II,
has a thorough description of the
episode selection process. A climatology
of high ozone days for 1987–2004 was
prepared, considering synoptic
meteorological conditions, temperature,
wind speed, wind direction, and
frequency of high ozone by month, day
of week, and hour of day. For the more
recent 2000–2004 period, ozone spatial
patterns were examined, and back
trajectories prepared to help assess
whether ozone was locally generated or
partly due to transport from outside the
domain. High temperature occurred on
summer days whether they exceeded
the standard or not, and so was not
useful in selecting episodes. Typical
features of episodes are high ozone
concentrations northeast of central
Phoenix and winds from the east in the
morning, shifting to south at midday,
and then southwesterly in the afternoon.
Based on the analysis, MAG identified
three meteorological regimes leading to
high ozone concentrations, and six
candidate recent ozone episodes. On the
basis of ozone episode severity and
duration, MAG chose three of the
episodes for modeling. Regime 1 is
characterized by stagnant winds and
purely local generation of ozone; it
includes some weekend exceedances. It
is represented by the July 8–14, 2002
episode with a maximum ozone
concentration of 107 ppb at Maryvale,
and eight other exceeding sites; this was
the episode with the highest ozone
concentration during the 2000–2004
period. Regime 2 is characterized by
light winds, with potential for transport
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21698
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
from the south and southwest. It is
represented by the June 3–7, 2002
episode with a maximum ozone
concentration of 92 ppb at Fountain
Hills, and eleven other exceeding sites.
Regime 3 is characterized by a non-calm
winds from other directions. It is
represented by the August 5–11, 2001
episode with a maximum ozone
concentration of 99 ppb at Cave Creek,
and four other exceeding sites. (Both
regimes 2 and 3 occur in this episode.)
The regimes had in common low wind
speeds, partial cloud cover, and a low
pressure system in the southwest of the
State and a high pressure system in the
northeast. EPA finds the selection
process to be well-documented and
well-reasoned, and the selected
episodes to be a good basis for the
attainment demonstration.
Section IV of the Modeling TSD in
Volume one of the Appendices to the
2007 Ozone Plan includes extensive
statistical and graphical analysis
demonstrating adequate overall model
performance for the June 2002 episode,
but also shows consistent
underprediction for the August 2001
and July 2002 episodes. Under EPA
Guidelines, models are used in a
relative sense (see discussion on
Relative Response Factors below), so
although underpredictions in model
performance do not necessarily mean
that future design values would be
underpredicted, they do suggest that
these two episodes may be less reliable
for predicting the effect of emissions
changes. Thus, primary weight was
given to the June 2002 episode in the
attainment demonstration. CAMx model
diagnostic sensitivity tests were
performed by MAG to provide assurance
that the model is adequately simulating
the physical and chemical processes
leading to ozone in the atmosphere and
that the model responds in a
scientifically reasonable way to
emissions changes. The tests included
zeroing out boundary condition
concentrations, initial condition
concentrations, and various categories
of emissions. The model responded in a
physically reasonable way in each of
these tests. MAG also undertook
sensitivity tests for MM5, which
provides meteorological input to the
CAMx air quality model. These are
described in Appendix III to the
Modeling TSD, and included
incorporation of alternative
observational data sets, and an
alternative convection scheme to avoid
overestimating convective rainfall in
this dry southwestern area. The
meteorological model was found to
perform adequately for wind speed,
wind direction, temperature, and
humidity. EPA finds the procedures
MAG followed to be well-documented
and reasonable, and to be acceptable for
supporting the modeled attainment
demonstration.
For the modeled attainment test, the
model is used to predict the air quality
effect of changes in emissions due to
land use changes, growth, and the effect
of control measures. Under current EPA
Guidance, the model is used to develop
Relative Response Factors (RRFs) that
give the model’s response to emission
changes, and the RRFs are applied to
monitored design value concentrations
to arrive at the predicted future
concentrations. The particulars of the
calculation, and which model grid cells
and modeled days are to be included,
are specified in the EPA Guidance.
Guidance pp. 15, 25, and 155. MAG
assessed the 2008 effect of the seven
control measures using the EPAspecified procedure, and found the
maximum predicted ozone design value
to be 84 ppb, which is in attainment of
the ozone NAAQS. It should be noted
that this result includes 5 percent
additional NOX to create a safety margin
for the transportation conformity motor
vehicle emissions budget. EPA agrees
that MAG’s modeling demonstrates
attainment of the ozone NAAQS by
summer 2008.
In addition to a modeled attainment
demonstration, which focuses on
locations with an air quality monitor,
EPA generally requires an Unmonitored
Area Analysis. This analysis is intended
to ensure that a control strategy leads to
reductions in ozone at other locations
that have no monitor but that might
have base year (and/or future year)
ambient ozone levels exceeding the
NAAQS. The unmonitored area analysis
uses a combination of model output and
ambient data to identify areas that might
exceed the NAAQS if monitors were
located there. In order to examine
unmonitored areas in all portions of the
modeling domain, EPA recommends use
of interpolated spatial fields of ambient
data combined with gridded modeled
outputs. Guidance, p. 29. MAG used a
variation of the EPA-described
approach, described in section V of the
modeling TSD, as a corroboratory
screening test. The attainment
demonstration passed this corroboratory
screening test. EPA notes that
concentration gradients in the supplied
spatial isopleth maps appear to be weak
except in the downtown area where the
monitoring network is fairly dense and
the RRFs themselves have only weak
spatial variation. We believe the plan’s
Unmonitored Area Analysis is adequate.
Finally, the Weight of Evidence
Analysis in Appendix V of the Modeling
TSD, in Volume two of the Appendices
to the 2007 Ozone Plan, includes several
supplemental analyses in support of the
attainment demonstration. These
include ozone air quality trends and
precursor emission trends, both of
which show continued progress and
support the conclusion that the
attainment demonstration is sound.
Appendix G of Attachment II to the
modeling protocol, in Volume two of
the Appendices to the 2007 Ozone Plan
also illustrated the downward ozone
trends at all ozone monitors. Other
analyses examined the sensitivity of the
model to NOX reductions, the
representation of VOC speciation in the
model, the VOC:NOX ratio as a
photochemical indicator, Process
Analysis, and examination of Weekday
vs. Weekend effects. These analyses
provided observational and modeling
evidence that the model is correctly
replicating the ozone photochemistry of
the area, and that the Weight of
Evidence supports the conclusion that
the Phoenix-Mesa will attain the ozone
NAAQS in 2008. Additionally, Table 3
below shows that design values (DV) in
ppm from all monitors in the PhoenixMesa nonattainment area, operated by
three different agencies (Pinal County
Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD),
Maricopa County Air Quality Division
(MCAQD), and ADEQ), appear to have
been meeting the 1997 ozone NAAQS
based on monitored ozone
concentrations since 2005.
EPA proposes to find that the
modeling provides an adequate basis for
the RACM/RACT, RFP, and attainment
demonstrations in the Phoenix-Mesa
2007 8-Hour Ozone Plan.
TABLE 3—OZONE DESIGN VALUES FROM 2005–2010 MONITORING DATA IN PHOENIX-MESA NONATTAINMENT AREA*
Site
Site ID
Agency
Apache Junction ....
04–013–3001
PCAQCD ..........
Buckeye .................
04–013–4011
MCAQD ............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
2005–07
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2006–08
0.076
99
0.065
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
0.080
99
0.066
11APP1
2007–09
0.075
99
0.064
2008–10
0.073
99
0.064
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
21699
TABLE 3—OZONE DESIGN VALUES FROM 2005–2010 MONITORING DATA IN PHOENIX-MESA NONATTAINMENT AREA*—
Continued
Site
Site ID
Agency
Blue Point ..............
04–013–9702
MCAQD ............
Cave Creek ...........
04–013–4008
MCAQD ............
Central Phoenix .....
04–013–3002
MCAQD ............
Dysart ....................
04–013–4010
MCAQD ............
Falcon Field ...........
04–013–1010
MCAQD ............
Fountain Hill ..........
04–013–9704
MCAQD ............
Glendale ................
04–013–2001
MCAQD ............
Humboldt Mountain
04–013–9508
MCAQD ............
North Phoenix ........
04–013–1004
MCAQD ............
Pinnacle Peak .......
04–013–2005
MCAQD ............
Rio Verde ..............
04–013–9706
MCAQD ............
South Phoenix .......
04–013–4003
MCAQD ............
South Scottsdale ...
04–013–3003
MCAQD ............
JLG Supersite ........
04–013–9997
ADEQ ...............
Tempe ...................
04–013–4005
MCAQD ............
West Chandler .......
04–013–4004
MCAQD ............
West Phoenix ........
04–013–0019
MCAQD ............
2005–07
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
DV (ppm) ...............
% complete ...........
2006–08
100
0.067
100
0.079
100
0.075
99
0.067
97
0.076
97
0.082
98
0.075
100
0.081
100
0.082
99
0.078
99
0.083
99
0.072
99
0.078
98
0.076
100
0.077
97
0.076
100
0.074
100
100
0.064
94
0.078
100
0.074
97
0.067
100
0.075
98
0.079
100
0.074
100
0.078
100
0.081
95
0.074
99
0.080
92
0.072
99
0.077
97
0.076
98
0.077
97
0.076
98
0.078
99
2007–09
100
0.067
99
0.075
100
0.070
100
0.066
100
0.071
100
0.074
99
0.071
100
0.074
99
0.076
100
0.072
100
0.075
96
0.071
99
0.075
99
0.075
100
0.073
100
0.073
100
0.073
99
2008–10
100
0.070
99
0.074
100
0.071
100
0.068
100
0.070
100
0.074
100
0.072
100
0.071
100
0.077
100
0.073
99
0.072
100
0.072
100
0.074
99
0.075
99
0.071
98
0.073
100
0.073
99
* The data in this table has been certified in EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS) database in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR part 58.
We provide these data only to support our evaluation of the modeling and attainment demonstration and not to support a determination regarding
attainment, which is not part of today’s proposed action.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Proposed Action on the Attainment
Demonstration
In order to approve a SIP’s attainment
demonstration, EPA must make several
findings:
First, we must find that the
demonstration’s technical bases,
emission inventories and air quality
modeling, are adequate. As discussed in
section IV.A and IV.C.2, we are
proposing to approve the base year
emission inventory and to find the air
quality modeling adequate to support
the attainment demonstration.
Second, we must find that the SIP
provides for expeditious attainment
through the implementation of all
RACM. As discussed above in section
III.B, we propose to find that the 2007
Ozone Plan provides for
implementation of all reasonably
available control measures necessary for
expeditious attainment of the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS and any related
RFP requirements in the Phoenix-Mesa
nonattainment area.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
Third, we must find that the emission
reductions that are relied on for
attainment are creditable and are
sufficient to provide for attainment. All
of the key attainment measures relied on
in the 2007 Ozone Plan to attain the
1997 8-hour ozone standard by June 15,
2009 have been adopted and approved
into the SIP.
For the foregoing reasons, we propose
to approve the attainment
demonstration in the 2007 Ozone Plan
for the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment
area.
D. Reasonable Further Progress
Demonstration
CAA section 172(c)(2) requires that
plans for nonattainment areas provide
for reasonable further progress (RFP).
RFP is defined in section 171(1) as
‘‘such annual incremental reductions in
emissions of the relevant air pollutant as
are required by [title 1, part D] or may
reasonably be required by the
Administrator for the purpose of
ensuring attainment of the applicable
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[standard] by the applicable date.’’ The
ozone implementation rule interprets
the RFP requirements for the purposes
of the 1997 ozone standards,
establishing requirements for RFP that
depend on the area’s classification. For
areas with attainment dates on or before
June 15, 2009, RFP would be met by
ensuring emissions reductions needed
for attainment are implemented by the
beginning of the ozone season prior to
the attainment date. See 40 CFR
51.910(b) and 70 FR 71612.
The attainment date for the PhoenixMesa ozone nonattainment area is June
15, 2009, and as discussed in the RACM
demonstration and control strategy
(section IV.B) and the attainment
demonstration (section IV.C) sections
above, all of the control measures
needed for the attainment
demonstration were being implemented
prior to the 2008 ozone season. We
propose, therefore, to approve the RFP
demonstration in the 2007 Ozone Plan.
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
21700
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
E. Contingency Measures
1. Requirements for Contingency
Measures
CAA section 172(c)(9) requires plans
to provide for the implementation of
contingency measures, that achieve
additional emission reductions, to be
undertaken if the area fails to meet RFP
milestones or fails to attain by its
attainment date. These contingency
measures must be rules or measures that
are ready for implementation quickly
upon failure to meet milestones or
attainment. The SIP should define
trigger mechanisms for the contingency
measures, specify a schedule for
implementation, and indicate that the
measures will be implemented without
significant further action by the State or
EPA. See 68 FR 32802 (June 2, 2002)
and 70 FR 71612 (Nov. 29, 2005).
Additional guidance on the CAA
contingency measure provisions is
found in the General Preamble at
13510–13512 and 13520. The guidance
indicates that states should adopt and
submit contingency measures sufficient
to provide a 3 percent emission
reduction from the adjusted RFP base
year. This level of reduction is generally
acceptable to offset emission increase
while States are correcting their SIPs.
These reductions would be beyond what
is needed to meet the attainment and/
or RFP requirement. States may use
reductions of either VOC or NOX or a
combination of both to meet the
contingency measure requirements.
General Preamble at 13520, footnote 6.
EPA guidance also provides that
contingency measures could be
implemented early, i.e., prior to the
milestone or attainment date.21
Consistent with this policy, states are
allowed to use excess reductions from
already adopted measures to meet the
CAA section 172(c)(9) and 182(c)(9)
contingency measure requirement. This
is because the purpose of contingency
measures is to provide extra reductions
that are not relied on for RFP or
attainment that will provide for
continued progress while the plan is
being revised to fully address the failure
to meet the required milestone. Nothing
in the CAA precludes a State from
implementing such measures before
they are triggered. This approach has
been approved in numerous SIPs. See
62 FR 15844 (April 3, 1997) (approval
of the Indiana portion of the Chicago
area 15 percent Rate of Progress plan);
66 FR 30811 (June 8, 2001) (proposed
approval of the Rhode Island post-1996
ROP plan); and 66 FR 586 and 66 FR
634 (January 3, 2001) (approval of the
Massachusetts and Connecticut 1-hour
ozone attainment demonstrations). In
the only adjudicated challenge to this
approach, the court upheld it. See
LEAN v. EPA, 382 F.3d 575 (5th Cir.
2004); 70 FR 71612.
2. Contingency Measures in the 2007
Ozone Plan
Contingency measure provisions for
the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area
and the methodologies used to estimate
the emission reductions from these
measures are described in Chapters 4
and 5 of the 2007 Ozone Plan and
Section V of Volume 1 of the
Appendices to the 2007 Ozone Plan.
Table 4 lists the five contingency
measures and the estimated reductions
in VOC and NOX emissions from each
measure. All five contingency measures
have already been implemented in the
Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area, but
credit for these measures were not
needed or used to demonstrate
attainment. See 2007 Ozone Plan at pp.
4–7 through 4–10 and 5–15 through
5–17.
TABLE 4—EMISSION REDUCTIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL CONTINGENCY MEASURES IN THE PHOENIX-MESA 8-HOUR OZONE
MODELING DOMAIN
Base case emissions on June 6, 2002
VOC
696.13 metric tons/day
Reduction
(metric ton/
day)
Contingency measure
NOX
291.82 metric tons/day
Percent
reduction
Reduction
(metric ton/
day)
Percent
reduction
Expansion of Area A Boundaries ....................................................................
Gross Polluter Option for I/M Waivers .............................................................
Increased Waiver Repair Limit Options ...........................................................
Federal Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Standards ...............................................
Federal Nonroad Equipment Standards ..........................................................
1.3
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
14.6
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
2.1
0.7
<0.1
<0.1
2.5
15.6
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.9
5.3
Total ..........................................................................................................
15.9
2.3
18.8
6.4
Source: 2007 Ozone Plan at Table 5–6.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
a. Expansion of Area A Boundaries
In 2001, the Arizona legislature
passed H.B. 2538 to expand the
boundaries of Area A, adding additional
portions of Maricopa County west of
Goodyear and Peoria and a small area
on the north side of Lake Pleasant. The
implementation of air quality measures
within the new Area A boundaries
began on January 1, 2002, except for
public sector alternative fuel
requirements to be phased in over a
seven-year period. MAG modeled this
contingency measure by increasing the
21 Memorandum, G.T. Helms, Chief, Ozone/
Carbon Monoxide Programs Branch to Air Directors,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
number of registered vehicles in Area A
that will be required to participate in
the I/M program. MAG estimated the
emission reductions from this
contingency measure to be 1.3 metric
tons per day of VOC and 0.7 metric tons
per day of NOX, but did not take credit
for this measure in the attainment
demonstration. See 2007 Ozone Plan at
4–7 and 4–8.
b. Gross Polluter Option for I/M Waivers
The Arizona legislature passed S.B.
1427 in 1998 to require vehicle owners
with vehicles emitting more than twice
the emission standard to repair the
vehicle sufficiently to reduce the
emission levels to less than twice the
standard in order to obtain a compliance
waiver from the Vehicle Emissions
Inspection Program. ADEQ modeled the
emission reductions for this measure
and estimated the emission reductions
from this contingency measure to be less
than 0.1 metric tons per day of VOC and
less than 0.1 metric tons per day of
NOX. MAG but did not take credit for
this measure in its attainment
‘‘Contingency Measures for Ozone and Carbon
Monoxide Redesignations,’’ June 1, 1992.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
demonstration. See 2007 Ozone Plan at
4–9.
c. Increased Waiver Repair Limit
Options
In 1998, the Arizona legislature
passed S.B. 1427 to increase the amount
a person must spend to repair a failing
1967–1974 vehicle in Area A in order to
qualify for a waiver from $100 to $200.
MAG modeled this measure using
MOBILE6.2 by reducing the pre-1981
vehicle waiver rate from 4 to 2.6
percent. The emission reductions from
this contingency measure were
estimated to be less than 0.1 metric tons
per day of VOC and less than 0.1 metric
tons per day of NOX. MAG did not take
credit for this measure in its attainment
demonstration. See 2007 Ozone Plan at
4–9.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
d. Federal Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle
Standards
On January 18, 2001, EPA issued a
final rule that set more stringent
emission standards for new heavy duty
diesel vehicles (66 FR 5001). The rule
requires high-efficiency catalytic
convertors or comparable technologies
be installed on 2007 and later model
year diesel vehicles, and requires ultralow sulfur fuel be used in all onroad
diesel vehicles beginning in 2006. MAG
modeled emission reductions from this
federal measure using MOBILE6.2 and
estimated VOC reductions of less than
0.1 metric tons of VOC per day and 2.5
metric tons of NOX per day. MAG did
not take credit for this measure in its
attainment demonstration. See 2007
Ozone Plan at 4–9.
e. Federal Nonroad Equipment
Standards
On October 23, 1998, EPA issued a
final rule to set more stringent Tier 2
and Tier 3 emission standards for new
diesel nonroad equipment (63 FR
56967). The Tier 2 program phased in
more stringent standards for all
equipment between 2001 and 2006 and
Tier 3 imposed even more stringent
standards for 50 to 750 horsepower
engines in 2006 to 2008. Additionally,
on June 29, 2004, EPA issued the Clean
Air Nonroad Diesel—Tier 4 Final rule to
require manufacturers to produce
nonroad engines with emission controls
that will reduce emissions by more than
90 percent (69 FR 38958). The Tier 4
standards apply to nonroad engines less
than 25 horsepower beginning in 2008
and will apply to larger engines over
2011 to 2015. MAG estimated emission
reductions from this measure using the
EPA NONROAD model and projected
VOC emission reductions of 14.6 metric
tons of VOC per day and 15.6 metric
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
tons of NOX per day. MAG did not take
credit for this measure in its attainment
demonstration. See 2007 Ozone Plan at
4–9 and 4–10.
3. Proposed Action on the Contingency
Measures
We propose to approve the
contingency measures in the 2007
Ozone Plan. The contingency measures
are consistent with EPA guidance that
recommends a 3 percent emission
reduction. All contingency measures
have already been implemented but
EPA guidance allows for the early
implementation of contingency
measures.
F. Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for
Transportation Conformity
1. Requirements for Motor Vehicle
Emission Budgets
CAA section 176(c) requires federal
actions in nonattainment and
maintenance areas to conform to the
SIP’s goals of eliminating or reducing
the severity and number of violations of
the NAAQS and achieving expeditious
attainment of the standards. Conformity
to the SIP’s goals means that such
actions will not: (1) Cause or contribute
to violations of a NAAQS, (2) worsen
the severity of an existing violation, or
(3) delay timely attainment of any
NAAQS or any interim milestone.
Actions that involve Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) or Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) funding
or approval are subject to the EPA’s
transportation conformity rule, codified
in 40 CFR part 93, subpart A. Under this
rule, metropolitan planning
organizations (MPOs) in nonattainment
and maintenance areas coordinate with
state and local air quality and
transportation agencies, EPA, FHWA,
and FTA to demonstrate that an area’s
regional transportation plans (RTP) and
transportation improvement programs
(TIP) conform to the applicable SIP.
This demonstration is typically done by
showing that estimated emissions from
existing and planned highway and
transit systems are less than or equal to
the motor vehicle emission budgets
(budgets) contained in the SIP. An
attainment, maintenance, or RFP SIP
should establish budgets for the
attainment year, each required RFP year,
or last year of the maintenance plan, as
appropriate. Budgets are generally
established for specific years and
specific pollutants or precursors. Ozone
attainment and RFP plans should
establish budgets for NOX and VOC. See
40 CFR 93.102(b)(2)(i).
Before an MPO may use budgets in a
submitted SIP, EPA must first determine
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21701
that the budgets are adequate or approve
the budgets. In order for EPA to find the
budgets adequate and approvable, the
submittal must meet the conformity
adequacy requirements of 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4) and be approvable under all
pertinent SIP requirements. To meet
these requirements, the budgets must
reflect all of the motor vehicle control
measures contained in the attainment
and RFP demonstrations. See 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4)(v).
2. Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets in
the Phoenix-Mesa 2007 Ozone Plan
The 2007 Ozone Plan for Phoenix
Mesa included budgets for VOC and
NOX for the 2008 attainment year. On
October 4, 2007, we notified ADEQ and
MAG that we found the MVEB for the
2008 attainment year adequate for
transportation conformity purposes. See
letter from Deborah Jordan, EPA Region
9, to Nancy Wrona, ADEQ, and Dennis
Smith, MAG, ‘‘RE: Adequacy Status of
Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in
Eight-Hour Ozone Plan for the Maricopa
Nonattainment Area (June 2007)’’,
October 4, 2007. We published a notice
of our findings at 72 FR 60666 (October
25, 2007). The budget for the 2008
attainment year is represented by
onroad VOC and NOX emissions for the
Phoenix-Mesa modeling domain on the
peak episode day in June 2008 of 72.3
metric tons per day of VOC and 145.5
metric tons per day of NOX. MAG used
geographic information systems (GIS) to
separate the onroad mobile emissions
from the Phoenix-Mesa 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area from the modeling
domain, resulting in the estimated 2008
MVEB of 67.9 metric tons per day of
VOC and 138.2 metric tons per day of
NOX.
3. Proposed Action on the Motor
Vehicle Emission Budgets
Based on our evaluation of the 2007
Ozone Plan and the budgets contained
in it, which reflect all motor vehicle
control measures contained in the
attainment and RFP demonstration, we
are proposing to approve the 2008
MVEB.
V. EPA’s Proposed Action
For the reasons discussed above, EPA
is proposing to approve Arizona’s
submitted SIP for attaining the 1997
8-Hour Ozone Standard in the PhoenixMesa nonattainment area.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to
approve under CAA section 110(k)(3)
the following elements of the 2007
Ozone Plan for Phoenix-Mesa:
1. The 2002 base year emission
inventory as meeting the requirements
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
21702
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Proposed Rules
of CAA section 172(c)(3) and 40 CFR
51.915;
2. The reasonably available control
measures demonstration as meeting the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(1)
and 40 CFR 51.912(d);
3. The reasonable further progress
demonstration as meeting the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(2)
and 40 CFR 51.910;
4. The attainment demonstration as
meeting the requirements of CAA
section 172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.908;
5. The contingency measures for
failure to make RFP or to attain as
meeting the requirements of CAA
section 172(c)(9); and
6. The motor vehicle emission
budgets for the attainment year of 2008,
which are derived from the attainment
demonstration, as meeting the
requirements of CAA section 176(c) and
40 CFR part 93, subpart A.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Ozone, Nitrogen
Dioxide, Volatile Organic Compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 30, 2012.
Keith Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
IX.
[FR Doc. 2012–8729 Filed 4–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2010–0724, FRL–9657–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Idaho:
Infrastructure Requirements for the
1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard; Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Greenhouse
Gas Permitting Authority and Tailoring
Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submittals from the State of Idaho
demonstrating that the Idaho SIP meets
the requirements of section 110(a)(1)
and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for
the National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) promulgated for
ozone on July 18, 1997. EPA is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposing to find that the current Idaho
SIP meets the following 110(a)(2)
infrastructure elements for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS: (A), (B), (C),
(D)(ii), (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K),
(L), and (M). EPA is taking no action on
CAA section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) at this time.
We will address the requirements of this
sub-element in a separate action. EPA is
also proposing to approve a SIP revision
that applies Idaho’s Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) Program
to greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting
sources above certain thresholds,
updates Idaho’s SIP to incorporate by
reference revised versions of specific
federal regulations, and removes
unnecessary language from the SIP due
to the incorporation by reference of the
federal NAAQS and PSD regulations. In
addition, EPA is proposing to rescind
the Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)
put in place to ensure the availability of
a permitting authority for greenhouse
gas emitting sources in Idaho.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2010–0724, by any of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: R10–
Public_Comments@epa.gov.
• Mail: Kristin Hall, EPA Region 10,
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics (AWT–
107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900,
Seattle, WA 98101.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: EPA Region
10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900,
Seattle, WA 98101. Attention: Kristin
Hall, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics,
AWT–107. Such deliveries are only
accepted during normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2010–
0724. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21690-21702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8729]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0253; FRL-9658-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plan for
1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard; Arizona
AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Arizona state
implementation plan (SIP) that demonstrate attainment of the 1997 8-
hour ozone national ambient air quality standards in the Phoenix-Mesa
nonattainment area by June 15, 2009. These SIP revisions are the 2007
Ozone Plan developed by the Maricopa Association of Governments and
adopted and submitted to EPA by the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality on June 13, 2007. EPA is proposing to approve the 2007 Ozone
Plan based on our determination that the plan contains all the
provisions required for areas classified as nonattainment under Part D,
Subpart 1 of the Clean Air Act, including the demonstration of
reasonably available control measures (RACM), reasonable further
progress (RFP), emission inventories, transportation conformity motor
vehicle emission budgets for 2008, and contingency measures to be
[[Page 21691]]
implemented if the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area fails to attain by
June 15, 2009.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2012-0253, by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
Email: lee.anita@epa.gov.
Mail or deliver: Marty Robin, Office of Air Planning (AIR-
2), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov., including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send email directly to EPA, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comments due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically on the www.regulations.gov Web site and in hard copy at
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105.
While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some
documents may be publicly available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section below. Copies of
the SIP materials are also available for inspection at the following
location:
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 1110 W.
Washington Street, First Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85007, Phone: (602) 771-
2217.
The SIP materials are also electronically available at: https://www.azmag.gov/Projects/Project.asp?CMSID2=1120.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anita Lee, Air Planning Office (AIR-
2), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 972-3958,
lee.anita@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. The 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard and the Phoenix-Mesa Ozone
Nonattainment Area
A. Background on the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
B. The Phoenix-Mesa 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
II. CAA and Regulatory Requirements for 1997 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area SIPs
III. Arizona's State Implementation Plan Submittal To Address Ozone
Attainment in the Phoenix-Mesa Nonattainment Area
A. Arizona's SIP Submittal
B. CAA Procedural and Administrative Requirements for SIP
Submittals
IV. Review of the 2007 Ozone Plan for Phoenix-Mesa
A. Emission Inventories
B. Reasonably Available Control Measures Demonstration and
Control Strategy
C. Attainment Demonstration
D. Reasonable Further Progress Demonstration
E. Contingency Measures
F. Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for Transportation Conformity
V. EPA's Proposed Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Throughout this document, ``we'', ``us'' and ``our'' refer to EPA.
I. The 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard and the Phoenix-Mesa Ozone
Nonattainment Area
A. Background on the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
Ground-level ozone pollution is formed in the atmosphere from the
reaction of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) in the presence of sunlight. These two pollutants,
referred to as ozone precursors, are emitted by many types of pollution
sources including on- and off-road motor vehicles and engines, power
plants and industrial facilities, and smaller area sources such as lawn
and garden equipment and paints.
Scientific evidence indicates that adverse public health effects
occur following exposure to ozone, particularly in children and adults
with lung disease. Breathing air containing ozone can reduce lung
function and inflame airways, which can increase respiratory symptoms
and aggravate asthma or other lung diseases. Ozone exposure also has
been associated with increased susceptibility to respiratory
infections, medication use, doctor visits, and emergency department
visits and hospital admissions for individuals with lung disease. Ozone
exposure also increases the risk of premature death from heart or lung
disease. Children are at increased risk from exposure to ozone because
their lungs are still developing and they are more likely to be active
outdoors, which increases exposure. See ``Fact Sheet, Proposal to
Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone'', January
6, 2010 and 75 FR 2938 (January 19, 2010).
On July 18, 1997, EPA revised the primary and secondary national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or standard) for ozone to replace
the existing 1-hour ozone standard of 0.12 parts per million (ppm) with
an 8-hour standard of 0.08 ppm \1\ (62 FR 33856). EPA revised the ozone
standard after considering substantial evidence from numerous health
studies demonstrating that serious health effects are associated with
exposures to ozone concentrations above the levels of these revised
standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In March 2008, EPA completed another review of the primary
and secondary ozone standards and further tightened the standards by
lowering the level for both to 0.075 ppm (73 FR 16436, Mar. 27,
2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. The Phoenix-Mesa 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required
by Clean Air Act (CAA) section 107(d) to designate areas throughout the
nation as attaining or not attaining the NAAQS. Under the
implementation rule for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, EPA designated
certain areas as nonattainment under title I, part D, subpart 1 of the
CAA (subpart 1) if the area's 1-hour ozone design value was above the
level of the standard but below 0.121 ppm. On April 15, 2004, EPA
designated Phoenix-Mesa as ``Subpart 1'' nonattainment for the 1997 8-
hour ozone standard under CAA section 172. See 69 FR 23858 (April 30,
2004) and 40 CFR 81.303. The designation became effective on June 15,
2004. Under part D, subpart 1 of the Act, states must submit plans to
come into attainment within 3 years of the effective date of the
nonattainment designation, and must attain the standard as
expeditiously as practicable, but no later than 5 years after the
effective date of the designation. Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) submitted the 2007 Attainment Plan to EPA on June 13,
[[Page 21692]]
2007 \2\ to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone standard by the attainment
date of June 15, 2009, which is 5 years after the effective date of the
area's designation as nonattainment.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Letter from Stephen A. Owens, Director, Arizona Department
of Environmental Quality to Wayne Nastri, Regional Administrator,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, dated June 13,
2007, plus three enclosures, including the ``Eight-Hour Ozone Plan
for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area, dated June 2007'' and
Appendices Volumes one and two, dated June 2007.
\3\ On March 23, 2009, ADEQ submitted to EPA a redesignation
request and maintenance plan for Phoenix-Mesa for the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard based on ambient ozone monitoring data for the 2006-
2008 period. EPA has not yet acted on this submittal. The
maintenance plan and redesignation request are available from the
Maricopa Association of Governments at: https://www.azmag.gov/Projects/Project.asp?CMSID2=1120&MID=Environmental%20Programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In June 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court) vacated the portion of the
2004 ozone implementation rule that allowed areas to be classified
under subpart 1. See South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.
3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006), reh'g denied 489 F.3d 1245 (SCAQMD) (vacating
certain elements of EPA's Phase 1 ozone implementation rule). On
January 16, 2009 (74 FR 2936), EPA published a proposed rule to
address, among other issues, the DC Circuit Court vacatur of the
classification system that EPA used to designate a subset of initial
1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas under subpart 1. In that
rulemaking, EPA proposed that all areas designated nonattainment for
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS under subpart 1 would be classified as
subpart 2 areas (hereafter referred to as the Subpart 1/Subpart 2
Rulemaking). The Phoenix-Mesa area is included in the areas that would
be classified under subpart 2 if EPA's proposal is finalized. EPA has
not yet taken final action on the Subpart 1/Subpart 2 Rulemaking.
Following completion of the Subpart 1/Subpart 2 Rulemaking, EPA will
address in a future rulemaking any additional requirements that become
applicable to Phoenix-Mesa, if any, as a result of its classification
under subpart 2. If, after Phoenix-Mesa is classified under subpart 2,
EPA determines in a future rulemaking that the area is in attainment
with the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, then the obligation to submit
certain planning SIPs related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard pursuant to its subpart 2 classification would be suspended in
accordance with 40 CFR 51.918.
The Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area is located in the central
portion of Arizona and encompasses 4,880 square miles, including the
urban portions of Maricopa and Pinal Counties, the Fort McDowell
Yavapai Nation and the Salt River-Pima Maricopa Indian Community. For a
precise description of the geographic boundaries of the Phoenix-Mesa
nonattainment area, see 40 CFR 81.303. The Maricopa Association of
Governments (MAG) is the agency with primary responsibility for
developing the plan to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for
Phoenix-Mesa.
Ambient 8-hour ozone concentrations in Phoenix-Mesa vary depending
on location and season, with the highest values generally occurring in
May-September, in north Phoenix or the air quality monitors located in
the mountainous northeastern region of the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment
area. Ozone design values \4\ from Phoenix-Mesa that exceeded the 1997
8-hour standard of 0.08 parts per million \5\ (ppm) ranged from 0.085
ppm (for the 2000-2002, 2001-2003, and 2003-2005 periods) to 0.088 ppm
(for the 1998-2000 and 1999-2001 periods). The ozone design values for
the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area for the 2004-2006 period (highest
design value was 0.083 ppm) and years thereafter were at or below the
standard. See EPA Air Quality System (AQS) data available in the docket
for this proposed rulemaking and Table 3 below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A design value is an ambient concentration calculated using
a specific methodology to evaluate monitored air quality data and is
used to determine whether an area's air quality meets a NAAQS. The
methodology for calculating design values for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS
is found in 40 CFR part 50, Appendix I.
\5\ Based on the rounding conventions described in 40 CFR part
50, Appendix I, a design value of 0.085 ppm is the lowest value that
exceeds the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.08 ppm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. CAA and Regulatory Requirements for 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment
Area SIPs
Each area designated nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard is subject to, at minimum, the general requirements for
nonattainment area plans in subpart 1 of part D, title I of the CAA.
Subpart 2 of part D contains more detailed requirements for ozone
nonattainment areas classified under this subpart. The Phoenix-Mesa
ozone nonattainment area is not currently classified under subpart
2.\6\ EPA has proposed to classify the Phoenix-Mesa area under subpart
2 as ``marginal'' nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (see 74
FR 2936 at 2944, January 16, 2009) but has not yet completed this
rulemaking. Although a future final decision by EPA to classify the
Phoenix-Mesa area under subpart 2 may trigger additional future
requirements for the area, EPA believes that this does not prevent EPA
from proposing or ultimately finalizing our action on the 2007 Ozone
Plan in accordance with the subpart 1 requirements that currently apply
to the area.\7\ Thus, for purposes of evaluating the 2007 Ozone Plan,
we are reviewing it for consistency with the applicable requirements of
part D, title I of the Act, which are contained in sections 172(c)(1)-
(9).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ EPA now refers to these areas as ``former subpart 1''
nonattainment areas in light of the SCAQMD decision.
\7\ EPA is currently obligated under the terms of a Consent
Decree to take final action on the 2007 Ozone Plan by May 31, 2012.
See WildEarth Guardians v. Jackson, Case No. 4:11-cv-02205-SI (N.D.
CA).
\8\ Although the DC Circuit Court in SCAQMD rejected EPA's
rationale for implementing the 1997 8-hour ozone standard in certain
nonattainment areas solely under subpart 1, EPA does not believe
that the Court's ruling in this case alters any subpart 1
requirements that currently apply to the 2007 Ozone Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to assist states in developing effective plans to attain
the ozone standard, EPA issued the 8-hour ozone implementation rule.
This rule was finalized in two phases. The first phase of the rule
addresses classifications for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard,
applicable attainment dates for the various classifications, and the
timing of emissions reductions needed for attainment. See 69 FR 23951
(April 30, 2004). The second phase addresses SIP submittal dates and
the requirements for reasonably available control technology and
measures (RACT and RACM), reasonable further progress (RFP)
demonstration, modeling and attainment demonstrations, contingency
measures, and new source review. See 70 FR 71612 (November 29, 2005).
The rule is codified at 40 CFR part 51, subpart X.\9\ We discuss each
of the applicable CAA and regulatory requirements for 8-hour ozone
nonattainment plans in more detail below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ EPA has revised or proposed to revise several elements of
the 8-hour ozone implementation rule since its initial promulgation
in 2004. See, e.g., 74 FR 2936 (January 16, 2009); 75 FR 51960
(August 24, 2010); and 75 FR 80420 (December 22, 2010). None of
these revisions affect any provision of the rule that is applicable
to our proposed action today on the Phoenix-Mesa 2007 8-hour Ozone
SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Arizona's State Implementation Plan Submittal To Address Ozone
Attainment in the Phoenix-Mesa Nonattainment Area
A. Arizona's SIP Submittal
On June 13, 2007, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ) submitted the ``Eight-Hour
[[Page 21693]]
Ozone Plan for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area'' (2007 Ozone Plan) to
EPA as a revision to the Arizona SIP. The plan was deemed complete by
operation of law on December 13, 2007. MAG developed the 2007 Ozone
Plan and the MAG Regional Council Executive Committee adopted the plan
on June 11, 2007. ADEQ adopted the plan on June 13, 2007.\10\ The 2007
Ozone Plan contains complete emission inventories for ozone precursors
for 2002 and 2008, photochemical modeling to demonstrate that the
standard will be attained in 2008 through the continued implementation
of federal, state, and local control measures, motor vehicle emission
budgets (MVEBs) used for transportation conformity, and descriptions of
the State's compliance with CAA requirements for ``Subpart 1'' ozone
nonattainment areas. We are proposing to approve the 2007 Ozone Plan
for the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Letter from Stephen A. Owens, Director of Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality, to Wayne Nastri, Regional
Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX,
``Submittal of the Eight-Hour Ozone Plan for the Maricopa County
Nonattainment Area''. June 13, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. CAA Procedural and Administrative Requirements for SIP Submittals
CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) and 110(l) require a state to
provide reasonable public notice and opportunity for public hearing
prior to the adoption and submittal of a SIP or SIP revision. To meet
this requirement, every SIP submittal should include evidence that
adequate public notice was given and an opportunity for a public
hearing was provided consistent with EPA's implementing regulations in
40 CFR 51.102.
MAG has satisfied the applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements for reasonable public notice and hearing prior to adoption
and submittal of the 2007 Ozone Plan. MAG and ADEQ jointly held two
public hearings on June 1, 2007 and June 4, 2007. As evidence of
notification of public hearings consistent with 40 CFR 51.102, the SIP
submittal includes proof of newspaper publication and copies of letters
sent to EPA and affected federal, state, and local agencies notifying
interested parties of the joint MAG and ADEQ public hearings. We find,
therefore, that the 2007 Ozone Plan submittal meets the procedural
requirements for public notice and hearing in sections 110(a) and
110(l) of the CAA.
CAA section 110(k)(1)(B) requires EPA to determine whether a SIP
submittal is complete within 60 days of receipt. This section also
provides that any plan submittal that EPA has not affirmatively
determined to be complete or incomplete will be deemed complete by
operation of law six months after the date of submittal. EPA's SIP
completeness criteria are found in 40 CFR part 51, Appendix V. The 2007
Ozone Plan, submitted by ADEQ on June 13, 2007, was deemed complete by
operation of law on December 13, 2007.
IV. Review of the 2007 Ozone Plan for Phoenix-Mesa
EPA evaluated the 2007 Ozone Plan according to the general subpart
1 nonattainment plan requirements contained in section 172(c) of the
Act.
A. Emission Inventories
1. Requirements for Emissions Inventories
CAA section 172(c)(3) requires each state with an ozone
nonattainment area to submit plan provisions that include a
``comprehensive, accurate, current inventory of actual emissions from
all sources of the relevant pollutant or pollutants in such area,
including such periodic revisions as the Administrator may determine
necessary to assure that the requirements of this part are met''. EPA
has issued the ``Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of
Ozone and Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations'' (EI Guidance),\11\ which
provides guidance on how to develop base year and future year baseline
emission inventories for 8-hour ozone, PM2.5, and regional
haze SIPs. For areas designated nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone
standard in 2004, EPA recommends using calendar year 2002 as the base
year for the inventory. EI Guidance, p. 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ ``Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of Ozone
and Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations'', EPA-454/R-05-001, November
2005. This document is available at: https://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/eidocs/eiguid/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emissions inventories for ozone should include emissions of VOC,
NOX and carbon monoxide (CO) and represent an average summer
week day during the ozone season. See EI Guidance, pp. 14 and 17.
States should include documentation in their submittals explaining how
the emissions data were calculated. See 70 FR 71612 (Nov. 29, 2005) and
EI Guidance p. 40. In estimating mobile source emissions, states should
use the latest emissions models and planning assumptions available at
the time the SIP is developed. See 68 FR 32802 (June 2, 2003) and 70 FR
71612 (Nov. 29, 2005).
2. Emission Inventories in the 2007 8-Hour Ozone Plan
The base year and future year baseline inventories for
NOX, CO and VOC for the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area,
together with additional documentation for the inventories, are found
in Volume 1 of the Appendices to the 2007 Ozone Plan.\12\ These
inventories represent average summer day (ozone season) emissions. A
base year inventory is provided for 2002 and the projected baseline
inventory is provided for the attainment year of 2008.\13\ All
inventories include NOX, CO, and VOC emissions from point,
area, nonroad mobile, and onroad mobile sources, except that biogenic
emission inventories include only NOX and VOC emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ By ``future year baseline inventories'' or ``projected
baseline inventories'', we mean projected emission inventories for
future years that account for, among other things, the ongoing
effects of economic growth and adopted emission control
requirements.
\13\ EPA's ozone implementation rule defines ``attainment year
ozone season'' as ``the ozone season immediately preceding a
nonattainment area's attainment date.'' 40 CFR 51.900(g). Because
the attainment date for Phoenix-Mesa is June 15, 2009, we refer to
2008 as the attainment year, and the 2008 ozone season as the
``attainment year ozone season.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2002 Periodic Emission Inventory (PEI) emissions estimates for
Maricopa County and the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area, which provided
the basis for the 2002 base year inventory, were calculated in terms of
annual emissions and ozone season-day emissions. Emissions from point
sources were estimated from each identified facility through permit
system databases and annual emission reports submitted to the
facility's permitting authority. Emissions from area sources were
estimated by source category using information from permit databases
and previous SIP inventories. Nonroad mobile source emissions were
estimated with the EPA NONROAD 2002 model and onroad mobile source
emissions were estimated from emission factors for various vehicle
classes from MOBILE6.2 combined with estimates of vehicle miles
traveled (VMT) using data submitted by the Arizona Department of
Transportation to the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal
Highway Administration for the 2002 Highway Performance and Monitoring
System. Biogenic emissions of NOX and VOC were calculated
using MAGBEIS2, a modified version of the UAM-BEIS2 model developed
specifically for use in Maricopa County, based on land use
[[Page 21694]]
information, surface temperature data, and emission factors for land
use categories. See 2002 Periodic Emissions Inventory for Ozone
Precursors, June 2004 in Volume 1 of the Appendices to the 2007 Ozone
Plan.
Ozone precursor emissions from point, area, onroad, and nonroad
sources used in the modeling domain (Table 1) were developed from the
Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx), version 4.40,
and the Emissions Preprocessor System (EPS3.0), based on the 2002
Periodic Emission Inventory for the three ozone episodes modeled for
2002. Biogenic VOC emission estimates used for the 2002 modeling domain
(e.g., 451.3 metric tons per day in the June 2002 ozone episode) are
significantly higher than biogenic VOC emissions estimated in the 2002
PEI (e.g., 41.7 metric tons per ozone season day). Section III of
Appendix A, Exhibit 2 of the 2007 Ozone Plan describes the method used
to estimate biogenic emissions for the modeling domain. MAG used a
model developed in 2005, called Model of Emissions of Gases and
Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN), that was determined to be more reliable
and accurate for Maricopa County because it relies on local field
studies that identified dominant plant species and emission factors, as
well as locations and biomass densities, to estimate biogenic emissions
of ozone precursors. In the 2002 base year inventory, biogenic sources
contributed 65 percent to total VOC emissions. In contrast,
anthropogenic onroad mobile sources dominated the total NOX
emissions and accounted for 63 percent of total NOX. See
Tables 5-3 and 5-4 of the 2007 Ozone Plan.
The 2002 inventory was projected to 2008 by accounting for expected
growth factors, ongoing control programs, and retirement rates for
obsolete sources of emissions. MAG accounted for known projects in 2008
(e.g., the Phoenix Expansion Project of the Transwestern Pipeline
Company) and additionally applied a five percent increase to onroad
mobile source emissions of NOX and a three percent increase
to all other anthropogenic emissions of VOC and NOX. The
three percent increase was based on population projections prepared by
the Arizona Department of Economic Security, based on a 2005 special
census in Maricopa County. MAG applied the five percent increase to
onroad mobile source emissions of NOX to create a safety
margin for transportation conformity. See 2007 Ozone Plan, p. 5-5, and
Appendices to Ozone Plan, Volume 1.
For biogenic emissions, the 2002 inventory was held constant for
2008. In additional information provided to EPA, MAG explained that no
projected land use or land cover data was available for the 2008
attainment year, therefore biogenic emissions in the ozone modeling
domain were held constant.\14\ In the approved 1-hour ozone maintenance
plan, MAG projected an increase in VOC emissions from the Phoenix
Metropolitan nonattainment area due to changes in land use, i.e.,
increasing urbanization and residential land use and decreasing use of
land for agriculture. See 70 FR 13425 (Mar. 21, 2005). The 1-hour ozone
maintenance plan relied on MAGBEIS2 to estimate biogenic emissions from
the nonattainment area and modeling domain.\15\ As shown in the
additional information provided by MAG on February 8, 2012, the
MAGBEIS2 VOC emission factor for urbanized land use is greater than the
VOC emission factor for agricultural land use, therefore, based on the
projected increased urbanization in the 1-hour ozone nonattainment
area, VOC emissions projected by MAGBEIS2 increased from the 1999 base
year to the 2015 maintenance year. In contrast, as described above, the
2007 8-hour ozone plan relied on a new biogenic emissions model (MEGAN)
that is more representative of Maricopa County and its desert
environment. The additional information provided by MAG shows the
urbanized land use emission factors from MEGAN are lower than emission
factors associated with agriculture or other undeveloped desert
landscapes in Maricopa County. Therefore, using MEGAN, MAG expects that
the trend of increasing urbanization (as projected in the 1-hour ozone
maintenance plan) is expected to decrease VOC emissions from Maricopa
County. Because MAG did not have 2008 land use data available, it
determined that maintaining constant biogenic emissions of the ozone
precursors would be more conservative than attempting to estimate the
anticipated decrease in biogenic VOC emissions.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Email from Cathy Arthur, MAG, to Anita Lee, EPA, re:
``Biogenic VOCs'' on February 8, 2012, plus two attachments on land
use boundaries and emission factors.
\15\ Ibid.
\16\ Ibid.
Table 1--Emission Inventories for the Phoenix-Mesa Modeling Domain for
June Ozone Episode
[Metric tons per day]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX VOC
-------------------------------------------
2002 2008 2002 2008
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point....................... 11.15 32.78 11.72 13.55
Area........................ 9.79 13.49 90.56 105.03
Nonroad Mobile.............. 79.97 86.58 50.73 57.55
Onroad Mobile............... 182.36 145.52 91.84 72.34
Biogenics................... 8.56 8.56 451.28 451.28
-------------------------------------------
Total................... 291.82 286.93 696.13 699.75
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: 2007 Ozone Plan at Tables 5-3 and 5-4.
3. Proposed Action on the Emission Inventories
We have reviewed the 2002 base year inventory and the inventory
methodologies used in the 2007 Ozone Plan and believe that the
inventory was developed consistent with the CAA requirements as
reflected in the 8-hour ozone implementation rule and EPA's guidance.
The 2002 base year inventory is a comprehensive inventory of actual
emissions of ozone precursors in the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area.
We therefore propose to approve the base year inventory as meeting the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3) and EPA's 8-hour ozone
implementation rule.
[[Page 21695]]
B. Reasonably Available Control Measures Demonstration and Control
Strategy
1. Requirements for RACM and Control Strategies
CAA Section 172(c)(1) requires that each attainment plan ``provide
for the implementation of all reasonably available control measures as
expeditiously as practicable (including such reductions in emissions
from existing sources in the area as may be obtained through the
adoption, at a minimum, of reasonable available control technology),
and shall provide for attainment of the national primary ambient air
quality standards.'' The 8-hour ozone implementation rule requires that
for each nonattainment area that is required to submit an attainment
demonstration, the state must also submit concurrently a SIP revision
demonstrating that it has adopted all RACM necessary to demonstrate
attainment as expeditiously as practicable and to meet any RFP
requirements. 40 CFR 51.912(d).
EPA has previously provided guidance interpreting the RACM
requirement in the General Preamble at 13560 \17\ and in a memorandum
entitled ``Guidance on the Reasonably Available Control Measure
Requirement and Attainment Demonstration Submissions for Ozone
Nonattainment Areas'', John Seitz, Director, OAQPS to Regional Air
Directors, November 30, 1999 (Seitz memo). In summary, EPA guidance
provides that, to address the requirement to adopt all RACM, states
should consider all potentially reasonable control measures for source
categories in the nonattainment area to determine whether they are
reasonably available for implementation in that area and whether they
would, if implemented individually or collectively, advance the area's
attainment date by one year or more. See Seitz memo and General
Preamble at 13560.\18\ Any measures that are necessary to meet these
requirements that are not already either federally promulgated, part of
the state's SIP, or otherwise creditable in SIPs must be submitted in
enforceable form as part of a state's attainment plan for the area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The ``General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990'', published at 57 FR 13498 on
April 16, 1992, describes EPA's preliminary view on how we would
interpret various SIP planning provisions in title I of the CAA as
amended in 1990, including those planning provisions applicable to
the 1-hour ozone standard. EPA continues to rely on certain guidance
in the General Preamble to implement the 8-hour ozone standard under
title I.
\18\ See also ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for
Proposed Rulemaking on Approval of Plan Revisions for Nonattainment
Areas'', 44 FR 20372 (April 4, 1979), and Memorandum dated December
14, 2000 from John S. Seitz, Director, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, ``Additional Submission on RACM from States
with Severe One-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area SIPs''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAA section 172(c)(6) requires nonattainment plans to ``include
enforceable emission limitation, and such other control measures,
means, or techniques (including economic incentives such as fees,
marketable permits, and actions of emission rights), as well as
schedules and timetables for compliance, as may be necessary or
appropriate to provide for attainment of such standard in such area by
the applicable attainment date * * *.'' See also CAA section
110(a)(2)(A). The ozone implementation rule requires that all control
measures needed for attainment be implemented no later than the
beginning of the attainment year ozone season. See 40 CFR 51.908(d).
The attainment year ozone season is defined as the ozone season
immediately preceding a nonattainment area's attainment date. See 40
CFR 51.900(g).
2. RACM Demonstration and the Control Strategy in the 2007 Ozone Plan
The attainment demonstration for the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment
area, which we discuss further in section IV.D of this document, shows
that implementation of all of the measures identified as RACM for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS would enable the Phoenix-Mesa area to attain
the 1997 8-hour ozone standard during the 2008 ozone season, preceding
the 2009 attainment date for the area. EPA previously approved all of
the key NOX and VOC control measures, including several
dozen VOC RACT rules, as part of Arizona's plans for attaining and
maintaining the 1-hour ozone standard in Phoenix-Mesa.\19\ The 2007
Ozone Plan specifically relies on seven of these control measures to
demonstrate attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone standard by June 15,
2009, and provides for implementation of these measures by the
beginning of the attainment year ozone season (January 2008),
consistent with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.908(d). See 2007 Ozone
Plan at pp. 4-2 through 4-7.\20\ We discuss below the seven measures
that the attainment demonstration in the 2007 Ozone Plan relied on to
reduce emissions of VOC and/or NOX (see Table 2). Emission
reductions associated with each measure were estimated for the June
2008 ozone episode modeled for the attainment demonstration. Of these
seven measures, phased-in emission test cutpoints and the development
of intelligent transportation systems resulted in the greatest
reduction in VOC emissions, and the summer fuel reformulation resulted
in the greatest reduction in NOX emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See, e.g., 2007 Ozone Plan at Table 1-1; 68 FR 2912
(January 22, 2003); 69 FR 10161 (March 4, 2004); 70 FR 30370 (May
26, 2005); 70 FR 13425 (March 21, 2005) (proposed redesignation of
Phoenix to attainment for the 1-hour standard) and 70 FR 34362 (June
14, 2005) (final redesignation). RACT rules for NOX were
not required for purposes of attaining and maintaining the 1-hour
ozone NAAQS in Phoenix-Mesa because EPA approved a petition for
NOX exemption for this purpose. 60 FR 19510 (April 19,
1995).
\20\ The 2007 Ozone Plan refers to these seven control measures
as ``attainment measures,'' to be distinguished from ``baseline
measures,'' which were taken into account in the base year and
projection year emission inventories. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4-2 and
Volume 1 of the Appendices to the 2007 Ozone Plan at Table III-1.
Table 2--2008 Emission Reductions From ``Attainment Measures''
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------
% Change % Change
Metric ton/day compared to Metric ton/day compared to
reduction 2008 base case reduction 2008 base case
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summer Fuel Reformulation...................... \1\ (0.1) \1\ <0.1 10.3 3.5
Phased-in Emission Test Cutpoints.............. 3.1 1.2 2.6 0.9
One Time Waiver from Vehicle Emissions Test.... 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems.............. <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Develop Intelligent Transportation Systems..... 2.2 0.9 0.4 0.1
Tougher Enforcement of Vehicle Registration and 0.2 <0.1 0.1 <0.1
Emission Test Compliance......................
[[Page 21696]]
Rule 358: Polystyrene Foam Operations.......... 0.5 0.2 N/A N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total...................................... 6.0 2.4 13.4 4.6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: 2007 Ozone Plan at Table 5-2.
\1\ Increase.
a. Summer Fuel Reformulation
The 2007 Ozone Plan relies on H.B. 2307, a Cleaner Burning Gasoline
(CBG) program passed by the Arizona Legislature in 1997. The CBG
program contains requirements related to seasonal changes in gasoline
formulation related to vapor pressure and oxygen content. Typically,
fuel reformulation measures are designed to reduce summertime
evaporative VOC emissions. However, the results of MAG's emissions
modeling analyses suggest that the summer reformulation measure would
increase VOC emissions slightly and significantly reduce emissions of
NOX. In Volume 2 of the Appendices to the 2007 Ozone Plan,
in response to EPA comments, MAG explains that the slight increase in
projected VOC emissions from the summer fuel reformulation measure
occurred because the MOBILE6.2 input for the measure specified a Reid
vapor pressure (RVP) of 7.0 pounds per square inch (psi). Actual fuel
specifications for the 2002 base case used actual fuel specifications
from the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures that were lower
than 7.0 psi. The projected decrease in NOX emissions in
2008 from the summer fuel reformulation measure is a result of the
removal of the summertime (April 1 through November 1) minimum oxygen
content standard for Type 1 gasoline. Oxygenates in fuel are used to
improve combustion as a control strategy for CO and other products of
incomplete combustion, for example unburned VOCs; however improved
combustion also tends to increase formation of NOX.
Therefore, removal of the minimum summertime oxygenate standard is
projected to reduce formation of NOX. See 2007 Ozone Plan at
4-2, 4-3.
b. Phased-in Emission Test Cutpoints
The 2007 Ozone Plan describes two measures passed by the Arizona
Legislature that comprise this attainment measure: H.B. 2237, passed in
1997, that appropriates funds from the State General Fund to develop
and implement an alternative test protocol to reduce false failure
rates associated with the more stringent standards for the Vehicle
Emissions Testing Program, and S.B. 1427, which requires vehicles in
certain areas to be emission tested and requires owners of the newest
five model year vehicles to be exempt from testing but to pay an in
lieu fee that is deposited into the Arizona Clean Air Fund, effective
December 31, 1998. Using MOBILE6.2, MAG estimated that this measure
reduces NOX emissions by 2.6 metric tons per day in the June
2008 ozone episode and VOC emissions by 3.1 metric tons per day. See
2007 Ozone Plan at 4-3, 4-4.
c. One Time Waiver From Vehicle Emissions Test
The Arizona Legislature passed S.B. 1002 which limits issuance of a
waiver for failure to comply with emission testing requirements to one-
time only, effective January 1, 1997. MAG modeled this measure in
MOBILE6.2 by adjusting the percentage of waivers allowed and estimated
that this measure reduces NOX emissions by less than 0.1
metric tons per day in the June 2008 ozone episode and VOC emissions by
0.1 metric tons per day. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4-4.
d. Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems
House Bill 2237 passed by the Arizona Legislature contains
appropriations for fiscal years 1997-1998 and 1998-1999 to Arizona
Department of Transportation for distribution to cities and counties
for synchronization of traffic signals within and across jurisdictional
boundaries. MAG modeled this measure in MOBILE6.2 by adjusting the
input for idling time at traffic signals and estimated that this
measure reduces NOX emissions by less than 0.1 metric tons
per day in the June 2008 ozone episode and VOC emissions by less than
0.1 metric tons per day. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4-4, 4-5.
e. Develop Intelligent Transportation Systems
The 2007 Ozone Plan cites three committed control measures in the
1-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan that serve to reduce traffic congestion:
``Coordinate Traffic Signal Systems'', ``Develop Intelligent
Transportation Systems'', and ``Reduce Traffic Congestion at Major
Intersections''. The 2007 Ozone Plan describes these measures as
technologies implemented on the local level over fiscal years 2003-2006
that reduce VOC and NOX emissions by reducing congestion.
MAG estimated emission reductions from these measures to be 0.4 metric
tons of NOX per day in the June 2008 ozone episode and 2.2
metric tons of VOC per day. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4-5.
f. Tougher Enforcement of Vehicle Registration and Emission Test
Compliance
The 2007 Ozone Plan cites two measures from the Arizona Legislature
and a program implemented by the Arizona Motor Vehicle Division of the
Arizona Department of Transportation that collectively improve
enforcement of vehicle registration and compliance with vehicle testing
requirements: S.B. 1427 passed in 1998 that requires school and special
districts in certain areas to prohibit employees who have not complied
with emission testing requirements from parking in employee parking
lots, and H.B. 2254 passed in 1999 that requires vehicles owned by
federal, state, or political state subdivisions in Arizona to comply
with A.R.S 49-542. MAG modeled this measure in MOBILE6.2 by adjusting
the weighting between inspection and maintenance (I/M) and non-I/M
emission factors, and estimated that this measure reduces
NOX emissions by 0.1 metric tons per day in the June 2008
ozone episode and VOC emissions by 0.2 metric tons per day. See 2007
Ozone Plan at 4-5, 4-6.
[[Page 21697]]
g. Maricopa County Rule 358: Polystyrene Foam Operations
Rule 358 adopted by Maricopa County on April 20, 2005 limits VOC
emissions from the manufacturing of expanded-polystyrene products. MAG
relied on information provided by the Maricopa County Air Quality
Department that Rule 358 would result in 80 percent control
effectiveness and 80 percent rule effectiveness. MAG estimated VOC
emission reductions to be 0.5 metric tons per day in the June 2008
ozone episode, with no effect on emissions of NOX. See 2007
Ozone Plan at 4-6, 4-7.
3. Proposed Actions on the RACM Demonstration and Control Strategy
Based on our review of the RACM analysis and Arizona's adopted
rules, we propose to find that the 2007 Ozone Plan provides for
implementation of all reasonably available control measures necessary
to demonstrate expeditious attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone standard
and to meet any related RFP requirements in the Phoenix-Mesa
nonattainment area, consistent with the applicable requirements of CAA
section 172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.912.
C. Attainment Demonstration
1. Requirements for Attainment Demonstration
CAA section 172(c)(1) requires states with ozone nonattainment
areas to submit plan provisions that provide for attainment of the
national ambient air quality standards. See also 40 CFR 51.908. The
attainment demonstration should include:
a. Technical analyses to locate and identify sources of emissions
that are causing violations of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS within the
nonattainment area;
b. Adopted measures with schedules for implementation and other
means and techniques necessary and appropriate for attainment; and
c. Contingency measures required under section 172(c)(9) of the
CAA.
See 70 FR 71612 (Nov. 29, 2005).
The requirements for the first two items are described in the
sections on emission inventories and RACM/RACT above (sections IV.A and
IV.B) and in the sections on air quality modeling and attainment
demonstration that follow immediately below. Requirements for the third
item are described in the section on contingency measures (IV.F.).
2. Air Quality Modeling in the Phoenix-Mesa 2007 Ozone Plan
Under EPA's ozone implementation rule, an attainment demonstration
must meet the air quality modeling and other requirements of 40 CFR
51.112 and must be supported ``by means of a photochemical grid model
or any other analytical method determined by [EPA] to be at least as
effective.'' See 40 CFR 51.908. Air quality modeling is used to
establish attainment emissions targets, that is, a combination of ozone
precursor emission levels that the area can accommodate without
exceeding the NAAQS, and to assess whether the proposed control
strategy will result in attainment of the NAAQS.
Air quality modeling is performed for a base year and compared to
air quality monitoring data from that year in order to evaluate model
performance. Once the performance is determined to be acceptable,
future year changes to the emissions inventory are simulated with the
model to determine the effect of emissions reductions on ambient air
quality. The procedures for modeling ozone as part of an attainment
demonstration are contained in EPA's ``Guidance on the Use of Models
and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals
for the 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS and Regional Haze''
(Guidance). The Guidance also recommends that supplemental analyses be
performed, and used in combination with the modeling in a Weight of
Evidence determination that the control strategy will result in
attainment of the NAAQS. See Guidance p. 17.
The air quality modeling is described in Chapter 3 of the 2007
Ozone Plan and documented in Volume One of the Appendices to the 2007
Ozone Plan, in Appendix A, Exhibit 2 (``Modeling TSD''). We provide a
brief description of the modeling and a summary of our evaluation of it
below.
MAG performed the air quality modeling for the 2007 Ozone Plan
using the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx)
photochemical model, incorporating meteorological fields from the
Mesoscale Model version 5 (MM5). These models have been extensively
used in developing SIP attainment demonstrations and are identified in
EPA Guidance as candidate models. See Guidance pp. 139 & 160. While
there was no intensive field study for this modeling effort, 31 ozone
stations and 56 meteorological stations provided an ample database of
routinely collected data for use in model application development and
performance evaluation.
EPA recommends that States prepare modeling protocols as part of
their modeled attainment demonstrations. Guidance, p. 133. The Guidance
at pp. 133-134 describes the topics to be addressed in this modeling
protocol. A modeling protocol should detail the procedures for
conducting the modeling analysis, such as the background and
objectives, the schedule and organizational structure, selection of
ozone episodes to model, meteorological and emissions input data
preparation, model performance evaluation, interpreting modeling
results, and procedures for using the model to demonstrate whether
proposed strategies are sufficient to attain the NAAQS. The 2007 Ozone
Plan's modeling protocol is contained in Volume Two of the Appendices
to the 2007 Plan, in Appendix I-i, and covers all of the topics
recommended in the Guidance.
A key part of the modeling protocol is the selection of ozone
episodes to be modeled. An attainment demonstration that is robust
despite natural variability should include modeling of multiple days
with high ozone concentrations, spanning the range of meteorological
conditions that lead to exceedances of the NAAQS in the area. See
Guidance p. 146. Volume two of the Appendices to the 2007 Ozone Plan,
Attachment II, has a thorough description of the episode selection
process. A climatology of high ozone days for 1987-2004 was prepared,
considering synoptic meteorological conditions, temperature, wind
speed, wind direction, and frequency of high ozone by month, day of
week, and hour of day. For the more recent 2000-2004 period, ozone
spatial patterns were examined, and back trajectories prepared to help
assess whether ozone was locally generated or partly due to transport
from outside the domain. High temperature occurred on summer days
whether they exceeded the standard or not, and so was not useful in
selecting episodes. Typical features of episodes are high ozone
concentrations northeast of central Phoenix and winds from the east in
the morning, shifting to south at midday, and then southwesterly in the
afternoon. Based on the analysis, MAG identified three meteorological
regimes leading to high ozone concentrations, and six candidate recent
ozone episodes. On the basis of ozone episode severity and duration,
MAG chose three of the episodes for modeling. Regime 1 is characterized
by stagnant winds and purely local generation of ozone; it includes
some weekend exceedances. It is represented by the July 8-14, 2002
episode with a maximum ozone concentration of 107 ppb at Maryvale, and
eight other exceeding sites; this was the episode with the highest
ozone concentration during the 2000-2004 period. Regime 2 is
characterized by light winds, with potential for transport
[[Page 21698]]
from the south and southwest. It is represented by the June 3-7, 2002
episode with a maximum ozone concentration of 92 ppb at Fountain Hills,
and eleven other exceeding sites. Regime 3 is characterized by a non-
calm winds from other directions. It is represented by the August 5-11,
2001 episode with a maximum ozone concentration of 99 ppb at Cave
Creek, and four other exceeding sites. (Both regimes 2 and 3 occur in
this episode.) The regimes had in common low wind speeds, partial cloud
cover, and a low pressure system in the southwest of the State and a
high pressure system in the northeast. EPA finds the selection process
to be well-documented and well-reasoned, and the selected episodes to
be a good basis for the attainment demonstration.
Section IV of the Modeling TSD in Volume one of the Appendices to
the 2007 Ozone Plan includes extensive statistical and graphical
analysis demonstrating adequate overall model performance for the June
2002 episode, but also shows consistent underprediction for the August
2001 and July 2002 episodes. Under EPA Guidelines, models are used in a
relative sense (see discussion on Relative Response Factors below), so
although underpredictions in model performance do not necessarily mean
that future design values would be underpredicted, they do suggest that
these two episodes may be less reliable for predicting the effect of
emissions changes. Thus, primary weight was given to the June 2002
episode in the attainment demonstration. CAMx model diagnostic
sensitivity tests were performed by MAG to provide assurance that the
model is adequately simulating the physical and chemical processes
leading to ozone in the atmosphere and that the model responds in a
scientifically reasonable way to emissions changes. The tests included
zeroing out boundary condition concentrations, initial condition
concentrations, and various categories of emissions. The model
responded in a physically reasonable way in each of these tests. MAG
also undertook sensitivity tests for MM5, which provides meteorological
input to the CAMx air quality model. These are described in Appendix
III to the Modeling TSD, and included incorporation of alternative
observational data sets, and an alternative convection scheme to avoid
overestimating convective rainfall in this dry southwestern area. The
meteorological model was found to perform adequately for wind speed,
wind direction, temperature, and humidity. EPA finds the procedures MAG
followed to be well-documented and reasonable, and to be acceptable for
supporting the modeled attainment demonstration.
For the modeled attainment test, the model is used to predict the
air quality effect of changes in emissions due to land use changes,
growth, and the effect of control measures. Under current EPA Guidance,
the model is used to develop Relative Response Factors (RRFs) that give
the model's response to emission changes, and the RRFs are applied to
monitored design value concentrations to arrive at the predicted future
concentrations. The particulars of the calculation, and which model
grid cells and modeled days are to be included, are specified in the
EPA Guidance. Guidance pp. 15, 25, and 155. MAG assessed the 2008
effect of the seven control measures using the EPA-specified procedure,
and found the maximum predicted ozone design value to be 84 ppb, which
is in attainment of the ozone NAAQS. It should be noted that this
result includes 5 percent additional NOX to create a safety
margin for the transportation conformity motor vehicle emissions
budget. EPA agrees that MAG's modeling demonstrates attainment of the
ozone NAAQS by summer 2008.
In addition to a modeled attainment demonstration, which focuses on
locations with an air quality monitor, EPA generally requires an
Unmonitored Area Analysis. This analysis is intended to ensure that a
control strategy leads to reductions in ozone at other locations that
have no monitor but that might have base year (and/or future year)
ambient ozone levels exceeding the NAAQS. The unmonitored area analysis
uses a combination of model output and ambient data to identify areas
that might exceed the NAAQS if monitors were located there. In order to
examine unmonitored areas in all portions of the modeling domain, EPA
recommends use of interpolated spatial fields of ambient data combined
with gridded modeled outputs. Guidance, p. 29. MAG used a variation of
the EPA-described approach, described in section V of the modeling TSD,
as a corroboratory screening test. The attainment demonstration passed
this corroboratory screening test. EPA notes that concentration
gradients in the supplied spatial isopleth maps appear to be weak
except in the downtown area where the monitoring network is fairly
dense and the RRFs themselves have only weak spatial variation. We
believe the plan's Unmonitored Area Analysis is adequate.
Finally, the Weight of Evidence Analysis in Appendix V of the
Modeling TSD, in Volume two of the Appendices to the 2007 Ozone Plan,
includes several supplemental analyses in support of the attainment
demonstration. These include ozone air quality trends and precursor
emission trends, both of which show continued progress and support the
conclusion that the attainment demonstration is sound. Appendix G of
Attachment II to the modeling protocol, in Volume two of the Appendices
to the 2007 Ozone Plan also illustrated the downward ozone trends at
all ozone monitors. Other analyses examined the sensitivity of the
model to NOX reductions, the representation of VOC
speciation in the model, the VOC:NOX ratio as a
photochemical indicator, Process Analysis, and examination of Weekday
vs. Weekend effects. These analyses provided observational and modeling
evidence that the model is correctly replicating the ozone
photochemistry of the area, and that the Weight of Evidence supports
the conclusion that the Phoenix-Mesa will attain the ozone NAAQS in
2008. Additionally, Table 3 below shows that design values (DV) in ppm
from all monitors in the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area, operated by
three different agencies (Pinal County Air Quality Control District
(PCAQCD), Maricopa County Air Quality Division (MCAQD), and ADEQ),
appear to have been meeting the 1997 ozone NAAQS based on monitored
ozone concentrations since 2005.
EPA proposes to find that the modeling provides an adequate basis
for the RACM/RACT, RFP, and attainment demonstrations in the Phoenix-
Mesa 2007 8-Hour Ozone Plan.
Table 3--Ozone Design Values From 2005-2010 Monitoring Data in Phoenix-Mesa Nonattainment Area*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site Site ID Agency 2005-07 2006-08 2007-09 2008-10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Junction................. 04-013-3001 PCAQCD.................. DV (ppm).......... 0.076 0.080 0.075 0.073
................ % complete........ 99 99 99 99
Buckeye......................... 04-013-4011 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.065 0.066 0.064 0.064
[[Page 21699]]
................ % complete........ 100 100 100 100
Blue Point...................... 04-013-9702 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.067 0.064 0.067 0.070
................ % complete........ 100 94 99 99
Cave Creek...................... 04-013-4008 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.079 0.078 0.075 0.074
................ % complete........ 100 100 100 100
Central Phoenix................. 04-013-3002 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.075 0.074 0.070 0.071
................ % complete........ 99 97 100 100
Dysart.......................... 04-013-4010 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.067 0.067 0.066 0.068
................ % complete........ 97 100 100 100
Falcon Field.................... 04-013-1010 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.076 0.075 0.071 0.070
................ % complete........ 97 98 100 100
Fountain Hill................... 04-013-9704 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.082 0.079 0.074 0.074
................ % complete........ 98 100 99 100
Glendale........................ 04-013-2001 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.075 0.074 0.071 0.072
................ % complete........ 100 100 100 100
Humboldt Mountain............... 04-013-9508 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.081 0.078 0.074 0.071
................ % complete........ 100 100 99 100
North Phoenix................... 04-013-1004 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.082 0.081 0.076 0.077
................ % complete........ 99 95 100 100
Pinnacle Peak................... 04-013-2005 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.078 0.074 0.072 0.073
................ % complete........ 99 99 100 99
Rio Verde....................... 04-013-9706 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.083 0.080 0.075 0.072
................ % complete........ 99 92 96 100
South Phoenix................... 04-013-4003 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.072 0.072 0.071 0.072
................ % complete........ 99 99 99 100
South Scottsdale................ 04-013-3003 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.078 0.077 0.075 0.074
................ % complete........ 98 97 99 99
JLG Supersite................... 04-013-9997 ADEQ.................... DV (ppm).......... 0.076 0.076 0.075 0.075
................ % complete........ 100 98 100 99
Tempe........................... 04-013-4005 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.077 0.077 0.073 0.071
................ % complete........ 97 97 100 98
West Chandler................... 04-013-4004 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.076 0.076 0.073 0.073
................ % complete........ 100 98 100 100
West Phoenix.................... 04-013-0019 MCAQD................... DV (ppm).......... 0.074 0.078 0.073 0.073
................ % complete........ 100 99 99 99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The data in this table has been certified in EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR part 58. We provide
these data only to support our evaluation of the modeling and attainment demonstration and not to support a determination regarding attainment, which
is not part of today's proposed action.
3. Proposed Action on the Attainment Demonstration
In order to approve a SIP's attainment demonstration, EPA must make
several findings:
First, we must find that the demonstration's technical bases,
emission inventories and air quality modeling, are adequate. As
discussed in section IV.A and IV.C.2, we are proposing to approve the
base year emission inventory and to find the air quality modeling
adequate to support the attainment demonstration.
Second, we must find that the SIP provides for expeditious
attainment through the implementation of all RACM. As discussed above
in section III.B, we propose to find that the 2007 Ozone Plan provides
for implementation of all reasonably available control measures
necessary for expeditious attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and
any related RFP requirements in the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area.
Third, we must find that the emission reductions that are relied on
for attainment are creditable and are sufficient to provide for
attainment. All of the key attainment measures relied on in the 2007
Ozone Plan to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone standard by June 15, 2009
have been adopted and approved into the SIP.
For the foregoing reasons, we propose to approve the attainment
demonstration in the 2007 Ozone Plan for the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment
area.
D. Reasonable Further Progress Demonstration
CAA section 172(c)(2) requires that plans for nonattainment areas
provide for reasonable further progress (RFP). RFP is defined in
section 171(1) as ``such annual incremental reductions in emissions of
the relevant air pollutant as are required by [title 1, part D] or may
reasonably be required by the Administrator for the purpose of ensuring
attainment of the applicable [standard] by the applicable date.'' The
ozone implementation rule interprets the RFP requirements for the
purposes of the 1997 ozone standards, establishing requirements for RFP
that depend on the area's classification. For areas with attainment
dates on or before June 15, 2009, RFP would be met by ensuring
emissions reductions needed for attainment are implemented by the
beginning of the ozone season prior to the attainment date. See 40 CFR
51.910(b) and 70 FR 71612.
The attainment date for the Phoenix-Mesa ozone nonattainment area
is June 15, 2009, and as discussed in the RACM demonstration and
control strategy (section IV.B) and the attainment demonstration
(section IV.C) sections above, all of the control measures needed for
the attainment demonstration were being implemented prior to the 2008
ozone season. We propose, therefore, to approve the RFP demonstration
in the 2007 Ozone Plan.
[[Page 21700]]
E. Contingency Measures
1. Requirements for Contingency Measures
CAA section 172(c)(9) requires plans to provide for the
implementation of contingency measures, that achieve additional
emission reductions, to be undertaken if the area fails to meet RFP
milestones or fails to attain by its attainment date. These contingency
measures must be rules or measures that are ready for implementation
quickly upon failure to meet milestones or attainment. The SIP should
define trigger mechanisms for the contingency measures, specify a
schedule for implementation, and indicate that the measures will be
implemented without significant further action by the State or EPA. See
68 FR 32802 (June 2, 2002) and 70 FR 71612 (Nov. 29, 2005).
Additional guidance on the CAA contingency measure provisions is
found in the General Preamble at 13510-13512 and 13520. The guidance
indicates that states should adopt and submit contingency measures
sufficient to provide a 3 percent emission reduction from the adjusted
RFP base year. This level of reduction is generally acceptable to
offset emission increase while States are correcting their SIPs. These
reductions would be beyond what is needed to meet the attainment and/or
RFP requirement. States may use reductions of either VOC or
NOX or a combination of both to meet the contingency measure
requirements. General Preamble at 13520, footnote 6. EPA guidance also
provides that contingency measures could be implemented early, i.e.,
prior to the milestone or attainment date.\21\ Consistent with this
policy, states are allowed to use excess reductions from already
adopted measures to meet the CAA section 172(c)(9) and 182(c)(9)
contingency measure requirement. This is because the purpose of
contingency measures is to provide extra reductions that are not relied
on for RFP or attainment that will provide for continued progress while
the plan is being revised to fully address the failure to meet the
required milestone. Nothing in the CAA precludes a State from
implementing such measures before they are triggered. This approach has
been approved in numerous SIPs. See 62 FR 15844 (April 3, 1997)
(approval of the Indiana portion of the Chicago area 15 percent Rate of
Progress plan); 66 FR 30811 (June 8, 2001) (proposed approval of the
Rhode Island post-1996 ROP plan); and 66 FR 586 and 66 FR 634 (January
3, 2001) (approval of the Massachusetts and Connecticut 1-hour ozone
attainment demonstrations). In the only adjudicated challenge to this
approach, the court upheld it. See LEAN v. EPA, 382 F.3d 575 (5th Cir.
2004); 70 FR 71612.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Memorandum, G.T. Helms, Chief, Ozone/Carbon Monoxide
Programs Branch to Air Directors, ``Contingency Measures for Ozone
and Carbon Monoxide Redesignations,'' June 1, 1992.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Contingency Measures in the 2007 Ozone Plan
Contingency measure provisions for the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment
area and the methodologies used to estimate the emission reductions
from these measures are described in Chapters 4 and 5 of the 2007 Ozone
Plan and Section V of Volume 1 of the Appendices to the 2007 Ozone
Plan. Table 4 lists the five contingency measures and the estimated
reductions in VOC and NOX emissions from each measure. All
five contingency measures have already been implemented in the Phoenix-
Mesa nonattainment area, but credit for these measures were not needed
or used to demonstrate attainment. See 2007 Ozone Plan at pp. 4-7
through 4-10 and 5-15 through 5-17.
Table 4--Emission Reductions From Individual Contingency Measures in the Phoenix-Mesa 8-Hour Ozone Modeling
Domain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base case emissions on June 6, 2002 VOC 696.13 metric tons/day NOX 291.82 metric tons/day
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reduction Reduction
Contingency measure (metric ton/ Percent (metric ton/ Percent
day) reduction day) reduction
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expansion of Area A Boundaries.................. 1.3 0.2 0.7 0.2
Gross Polluter Option for I/M Waivers........... <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Increased Waiver Repair Limit Options........... <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Federal Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Standards..... <0.1 <0.1 2.5 0.9
Federal Nonroad Equipment Standards............. 14.6 2.1 15.6 5.3
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 15.9 2.3 18.8 6.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: 2007 Ozone Plan at Table 5-6.
a. Expansion of Area A Boundaries
In 2001, the Arizona legislature passed H.B. 2538 to expand the
boundaries of Area A, adding additional portions of Maricopa County
west of Goodyear and Peoria and a small area on the north side of Lake
Pleasant. The implementation of air quality measures within the new
Area A boundaries began on January 1, 2002, except for public sector
alternative fuel requirements to be phased in over a seven-year period.
MAG modeled this contingency measure by increasing the number of
registered vehicles in Area A that will be required to participate in
the I/M program. MAG estimated the emission reductions from this
contingency measure to be 1.3 metric tons per day of VOC and 0.7 metric
tons per day of NOX, but did not take credit for this
measure in the attainment demonstration. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4-7 and
4-8.
b. Gross Polluter Option for I/M Waivers
The Arizona legislature passed S.B. 1427 in 1998 to require vehicle
owners with vehicles emitting more than twice the emission standard to
repair the vehicle sufficiently to reduce the emission levels to less
than twice the standard in order to obtain a compliance waiver from the
Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program. ADEQ modeled the emission
reductions for this measure and estimated the emission reductions from
this contingency measure to be less than 0.1 metric tons per day of VOC
and less than 0.1 metric tons per day of NOX. MAG but did
not take credit for this measure in its attainment
[[Page 21701]]
demonstration. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4-9.
c. Increased Waiver Repair Limit Options
In 1998, the Arizona legislature passed S.B. 1427 to increase the
amount a person must spend to repair a failing 1967-1974 vehicle in
Area A in order to qualify for a waiver from $100 to $200. MAG modeled
this measure using MOBILE6.2 by reducing the pre-1981 vehicle waiver
rate from 4 to 2.6 percent. The emission reductions from this
contingency measure were estimated to be less than 0.1 metric tons per
day of VOC and less than 0.1 metric tons per day of NOX. MAG
did not take credit for this measure in its attainment demonstration.
See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4-9.
d. Federal Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Standards
On January 18, 2001, EPA issued a final rule that set more
stringent emission standards for new heavy duty diesel vehicles (66 FR
5001). The rule requires high-efficiency catalytic convertors or
comparable technologies be installed on 2007 and later model year
diesel vehicles, and requires ultra-low sulfur fuel be used in all
onroad diesel vehicles beginning in 2006. MAG modeled emission
reductions from this federal measure using MOBILE6.2 and estimated VOC
reductions of less than 0.1 metric tons of VOC per day and 2.5 metric
tons of NOX per day. MAG did not take credit for this
measure in its attainment demonstration. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4-9.
e. Federal Nonroad Equipment Standards
On October 23, 1998, EPA issued a final rule to set more stringent
Tier 2 and Tier 3 emission standards for new diesel nonroad equipment
(63 FR 56967). The Tier 2 program phased in more stringent standards
for all equipment between 2001 and 2006 and Tier 3 imposed even more
stringent standards for 50 to 750 horsepower engines in 2006 to 2008.
Additionally, on June 29, 2004, EPA issued the Clean Air Nonroad
Diesel--Tier 4 Final rule to require manufacturers to produce nonroad
engines with emission controls that will reduce emissions by more than
90 percent (69 FR 38958). The Tier 4 standards apply to nonroad engines
less than 25 horsepower beginning in 2008 and will apply to larger
engines over 2011 to 2015. MAG estimated emission reductions from this
measure using the EPA NONROAD model and projected VOC emission
reductions of 14.6 metric tons of VOC per day and 15.6 metric tons of
NOX per day. MAG did not take credit for this measure in its
attainment demonstration. See 2007 Ozone Plan at 4-9 and 4-10.
3. Proposed Action on the Contingency Measures
We propose to approve the contingency measures in the 2007 Ozone
Plan. The contingency measures are consistent with EPA guidance that
recommends a 3 percent emission reduction. All contingency measures
have already been implemented but EPA guidance allows for the early
implementation of contingency measures.
F. Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for Transportation Conformity
1. Requirements for Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets
CAA section 176(c) requires federal actions in nonattainment and
maintenance areas to conform to the SIP's goals of eliminating or
reducing the severity and number of violations of the NAAQS and
achieving expeditious attainment of the standards. Conformity to the
SIP's goals means that such actions will not: (1) Cause or contribute
to violations of a NAAQS, (2) worsen the severity of an existing
violation, or (3) delay timely attainment of any NAAQS or any interim
milestone.
Actions that involve Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding or approval are subject to
the EPA's transportation conformity rule, codified in 40 CFR part 93,
subpart A. Under this rule, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs)
in nonattainment and maintenance areas coordinate with state and local
air quality and transportation agencies, EPA, FHWA, and FTA to
demonstrate that an area's regional transportation plans (RTP) and
transportation improvement programs (TIP) conform to the applicable
SIP. This demonstration is typically done by showing that estimated
emissions from existing and planned highway and transit systems are
less than or equal to the motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets)
contained in the SIP. An attainment, maintenance, or RFP SIP should
establish budgets for the attainment year, each required RFP year, or
last year of the maintenance plan, as appropriate. Budgets are
generally established for specific years and specific pollutants or
precursors. Ozone attainment and RFP plans should establish budgets for
NOX and VOC. See 40 CFR 93.102(b)(2)(i).
Before an MPO may use budgets in a submitted SIP, EPA must first
determine that the budgets are adequate or approve the budgets. In
order for EPA to find the budgets adequate and approvable, the
submittal must meet the conformity adequacy requirements of 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4) and be approvable under all pertinent SIP requirements. To
meet these requirements, the budgets must reflect all of the motor
vehicle control measures contained in the attainment and RFP
demonstrations. See 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4)(v).
2. Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets in the Phoenix-Mesa 2007 Ozone Plan
The 2007 Ozone Plan for Phoenix Mesa included budgets for VOC and
NOX for the 2008 attainment year. On October 4, 2007, we
notified ADEQ and MAG that we found the MVEB for the 2008 attainment
year adequate for transportation conformity purposes. See letter from
Deborah Jordan, EPA Region 9, to Nancy Wrona, ADEQ, and Dennis Smith,
MAG, ``RE: Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Eight-
Hour Ozone Plan for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area (June 2007)'',
October 4, 2007. We published a notice of our findings at 72 FR 60666
(October 25, 2007). The budget for the 2008 attainment year is
represented by onroad VOC and NOX emissions for the Phoenix-
Mesa modeling domain on the peak episode day in June 2008 of 72.3
metric tons per day of VOC and 145.5 metric tons per day of
NOX. MAG used geographic information systems (GIS) to
separate the onroad mobile emissions from the Phoenix-Mesa 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area from the modeling domain, resulting in the estimated
2008 MVEB of 67.9 metric tons per day of VOC and 138.2 metric tons per
day of NOX.
3. Proposed Action on the Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets
Based on our evaluation of the 2007 Ozone Plan and the budgets
contained in it, which reflect all motor vehicle control measures
contained in the attainment and RFP demonstration, we are proposing to
approve the 2008 MVEB.
V. EPA's Proposed Action
For the reasons discussed above, EPA is proposing to approve
Arizona's submitted SIP for attaining the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard in
the Phoenix-Mesa nonattainment area.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve under CAA section
110(k)(3) the following elements of the 2007 Ozone Plan for Phoenix-
Mesa:
1. The 2002 base year emission inventory as meeting the
requirements
[[Page 21702]]
of CAA section 172(c)(3) and 40 CFR 51.915;
2. The reasonably available control measures demonstration as
meeting the requirements of CAA section 172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.912(d);
3. The reasonable further progress demonstration as meeting the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(2) and 40 CFR 51.910;
4. The attainment demonstration as meeting the requirements of CAA
section 172(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.908;
5. The contingency measures for failure to make RFP or to attain as
meeting the requirements of CAA section 172(c)(9); and
6. The motor vehicle emission budgets for the attainment year of
2008, which are derived from the attainment demonstration, as meeting
the requirements of CAA section 176(c) and 40 CFR part 93, subpart A.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone, Nitrogen
Dioxide, Volatile Organic Compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 30, 2012.
Keith Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2012-8729 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P