Don Pedro Hydroelectric Project: Turlock Irrigation District; Modesto Irrigation District; Supplement to Notice of Study Dispute Resolution Technical Conference, 21556-21557 [2012-8528]
Download as PDF
21556
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 10, 2012 / Notices
option of listening to the conferences
via phone-bridge for a fee. If you have
any questions, visit www.
CapitolConnection.org or call (703) 993–
3100.
FERC conferences are accessible
under section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973. For accessibility
accommodations please send an email
to accessibility@ferc.gov or call toll free
1–866–208–3372 (voice) or 202–208–
8659 (TTY); or send a fax to 202–208–
2106 with the required
accommodations.
For more information on this
conference, please contact Mary Cain at
mary.cain@ferc.gov or (202) 502–6337,
or Sarah McKinley at sarah.mckinley@
ferc.gov or (202) 502–8004.
Dated: April 2, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
The purpose of the technical
conference is to examine whether the
Commission should reconsider or
modify the reactive power provisions of
Order No. 661–A and examine what
evidence could be developed under
Order No. 661 to support a request to
apply reactive power requirements more
broadly than to individual wind
generators during the interconnection
study process.
Agenda for the Technical Conference
on Reactive Power Resources
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AD12–10
April 17, 2012
9 a.m.–9:15 a.m. Greeting and Opening
Remarks.
9:15 a.m.–12:15 p.m. Discussion of
Reactive Power in Interconnection
Studies.
This panel will discuss:
• Methods used to determine the
reactive power requirements for a
transmission system, and
• How system impact and system
planning studies take into account
changes in technologies connected
to the system.
• What evidence could be developed
to support a request to apply
reactive power requirements more
broadly than to individual wind
generators during the
interconnection study process.
Panelists:
• Noman Williams, Vice President—
Transmission Policy, Sunflower
Electric Power Corporation
• Yi Zhang, Senior Regional
Transmission Engineer, California
ISO
• Eric Laverty, Director of
Transmission Access Planning,
Midwest ISO
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
• Dmitry Kosterev, Electrical
Engineer, Bonneville Power
Administration
• Robert Jenkins, Director—Utility
Interconnection, First Solar
• Kris Zadlo, Vice President,
Invenergy
• Richard Kowalski, Director—
Transmission Strategy and Services,
ISO New England Inc.
• Warren Lasher, Director, System
Planning, ERCOT, Inc.
12:15 p.m.–1:15 p.m. Lunch Break.
1:15 p.m.–4:15 p.m. Discussion of
Reactive Power Resources.
Discussion items will include:
• The technical and economic
characteristics of different types of
reactive power resources, including
synchronous and asynchronous
generation resources, transmission
resources and energy storage
resources;
• The design options for and cost of
installing reactive power equipment
at the time of interconnection as
well as retrofitting a resource with
reactive power equipment;
• Other means by which reactive
power is currently secured such as
through self-supply; and
• How a technology that is capable of
providing reactive power but may
not be subject to the generation
interconnection process (e.g.,
FACTs) would be analyzed.
Panelists:
• Robert Nelson, Manager of Codes,
Standards, and Regulations,
Siemens Wind Turbines—Americas
• Kris Zadlo, Vice President,
Invenergy
• Robert Jenkins, Director—Utility
Interconnection, First Solar
• Michael Jacobs, Director Market and
Regulatory Policy, Xtreme Power,
Vice-Chair, Electricity Storage
Association Advocacy Council
• Khaled Abdul-Rahman, Director,
Power Systems Technology
Development, California ISO
• Eric Laverty, Director of
Transmission Access Planning,
Midwest ISO
• Dmitry Kosterev, Electrical
Engineer, Bonneville Power
Administration
• Warren Lasher, Director, System
Planning, ERCOT, Inc.
[FR Doc. 2012–8524 Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 2299–075]
Don Pedro Hydroelectric Project:
Turlock Irrigation District; Modesto
Irrigation District; Supplement to
Notice of Study Dispute Resolution
Technical Conference
On March 16, 2012, the Commission
issued a Notice of Dispute Resolution
Process Schedule, Panel, Technical
Conference, and Modified Filing Times
for Panel Recommendations and
Dispute Determination. The notice
announced that the Don Pedro Study
Dispute Resolution Panel’s technical
conference would be an all day meeting
in Sacramento, California on April 17,
2012. The notice stated that further
details would be supplied in a future
notice. Below are the final meeting
details:
a. Date and Time of Meeting: Tuesday,
April 17, 2012. 9 a.m.–5 p.m.
b. Place: Holiday Inn, SacramentoCapitol Plaza, 300 J Street, Sacramento,
CA 95814, 916–446–0100.
c. FERC Contact: Stephen Bowler,
Don Pedro Hydroelectric Project,
Dispute Resolution Panel Chair, (202)
505–6861, stephen.bowler@ferc.gov.
d. Purpose of Meeting:
The purpose of the technical
conference is for the disputing agencies,
the applicant, and the Commission to
provide the Panel with additional
information necessary to evaluate the
disputed studies. All local, state, and
federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other
interested parties are invited to attend
the meeting as observers. The Panel may
also request information or clarification
on written submissions as necessary to
understand the matters in dispute. The
Panel will limit all input that it receives
to the specific studies or information in
dispute and will focus on the
applicability of such studies or
information to the study criteria
stipulated in 18 CFR 5.9(b). If the
number of participants wishing to speak
creates time constraints, the Panel may,
at its discretion, limit the speaking time
for each participant.
e. Proposed Agenda:
The Panel will gather information on
NMFS identified study requests 1–4 and
7–9 as being in dispute. Specifically, the
disputed study requests are: Request 1—
Effects of the Project and Related
LaGrange Complex Facilities on
Anadromous Fish; Request 2—Effects of
the Project and Related Facilities
Evaluated Through an Operations
Model; Request 3—Effects of the Project
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
21557
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 10, 2012 / Notices
and Related Activities on Fish Passage
for Anadromous Fish; Request 4—
Effects of the Project and Related
Facilities Hydrology for Anadromous
Fish: Magnitude, Timing, Duration, and
Rate of Change; Request 7—Evaluation
of the Upper Tuolumne Habitats for
Anadromous Fish; Request 8—Salmon
and Steelhead Full Life-Cycle
Population Models; and Request 9—
Effects of the Project and Related
Facilities on Ecosystem/Marine-Derived
Nutrients for Anadromous Fish.
Dated: April 2, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–8528 Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL12–52–000]
System Energy Resources, Inc.; Notice
of Petition for Declaratory Order
Take notice that on March 28, 2012,
System Energy Resources, Inc. (System
Energy Resources), submitted a petition
requesting the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission to issue a
declaratory order determining that
System Energy Resources’ payment of
distributions out of common stock or
paid-in capital to its parent and sole
shareholder, Entergy Corporation, under
the circumstances and conditions
identified in the petition, will not
violate section 305(a) of the Federal
Power Act.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. On or before the
comment date, it is not necessary to
serve motions to intervene or protests
on persons other than the Applicant.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on April 27, 2012.
Dated: April 2, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–8525 Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
This notice announces final
agency action on 32 TMDLs prepared by
EPA Region 6 for waters listed in
Louisiana’s, Lake Pontchartrain Basin,
under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water
Act (CWA). Documents from the
administrative record file for the 32
TMDLs, including TMDL calculations
and responses to comments, may be
viewed at www.epa.gov/region6/water/
npdes/tmdl/index.htm. The
administrative record file may be
examined by calling or writing Ms.
Diane Smith at the address below.
Please contact Ms. Smith to schedule an
inspection.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane Smith, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Water Quality Protection
Division, U.S. EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202–2733, (214)
665–2145.
In 1996,
two Louisiana environmental groups,
the Sierra Club and Louisiana
Environmental Action Network
(plaintiffs), filed a lawsuit in Federal
Court against the EPA, styled Sierra
Club, et al. v. Clifford et al., No. 96–
0527, (E.D. La.). Among other claims,
plaintiffs alleged that EPA failed to
establish Louisiana TMDLs in a timely
manner. EPA established 32 of these
TMDLs pursuant to a consent decree
entered in this lawsuit.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
EPA Takes Final Agency Action on 32
TMDLs
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9657–2]
Clean Water Act: Final Agency Action
on 32 Total Maximum Daily Loads
(TMDLs) in Louisiana
By this notice EPA is taking final
agency action on the following 32
TMDLs on waters located within the
Louisiana Lake Pontchartrain Basin:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
Waterbody name
040102 .................................
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Subsegment
Comite River—Wilson-Clinton Hwy to entrance of White Bayou (East Baton Rouge
Parish) (Scenic).
Comite River—Entrance of White Bayou to Amite River ............................................
Bayou Manchac—Headwaters to Amite River ............................................................
Amite River—LA Hwy 37 to Amite River Diversion Canal ..........................................
Grays Creek—Headwaters to River Amite ..................................................................
Colyell Creek System (includes Colyell Bay) ..............................................................
Natalbany River—Headwaters to Tickfaw River ..........................................................
Yellow Water River—Origin to Ponchatoula Creek .....................................................
Ponchatoula Creek and Ponchatoula River .................................................................
Selsers Creek—Origin to South Slough ......................................................................
Big Creek and Tributaries—Headwaters to confluence with Tangipahoia River ........
W–14 Main Diversion Canal—from its origin in the north end of the City of Slidell to
its junction with Salt Bayou.
Salt Bayou—Headwaters to Lake Pontchartrain (Estuarine) ......................................
040103
040201
040302
040304
040305
040503
040504
040505
040603
040703
040909
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
.................................
040910 .................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pollutant
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Fecal Coliform
Fecal
Fecal
Fecal
Fecal
Fecal
Fecal
Fecal
Fecal
Fecal
Fecal
Fecal
Coliform.
Coliform.
Coliform.
Coliform.
Coliform.
Coliform.
Coliform.
Coliform.
Coliform.
Coliform.
Coliform.
Fecal Coliform.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21556-21557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8528]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2299-075]
Don Pedro Hydroelectric Project: Turlock Irrigation District;
Modesto Irrigation District; Supplement to Notice of Study Dispute
Resolution Technical Conference
On March 16, 2012, the Commission issued a Notice of Dispute
Resolution Process Schedule, Panel, Technical Conference, and Modified
Filing Times for Panel Recommendations and Dispute Determination. The
notice announced that the Don Pedro Study Dispute Resolution Panel's
technical conference would be an all day meeting in Sacramento,
California on April 17, 2012. The notice stated that further details
would be supplied in a future notice. Below are the final meeting
details:
a. Date and Time of Meeting: Tuesday, April 17, 2012. 9 a.m.-5 p.m.
b. Place: Holiday Inn, Sacramento-Capitol Plaza, 300 J Street,
Sacramento, CA 95814, 916-446-0100.
c. FERC Contact: Stephen Bowler, Don Pedro Hydroelectric Project,
Dispute Resolution Panel Chair, (202) 505-6861,
stephen.bowler@ferc.gov.
d. Purpose of Meeting:
The purpose of the technical conference is for the disputing
agencies, the applicant, and the Commission to provide the Panel with
additional information necessary to evaluate the disputed studies. All
local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other interested
parties are invited to attend the meeting as observers. The Panel may
also request information or clarification on written submissions as
necessary to understand the matters in dispute. The Panel will limit
all input that it receives to the specific studies or information in
dispute and will focus on the applicability of such studies or
information to the study criteria stipulated in 18 CFR 5.9(b). If the
number of participants wishing to speak creates time constraints, the
Panel may, at its discretion, limit the speaking time for each
participant.
e. Proposed Agenda:
The Panel will gather information on NMFS identified study requests
1-4 and 7-9 as being in dispute. Specifically, the disputed study
requests are: Request 1--Effects of the Project and Related LaGrange
Complex Facilities on Anadromous Fish; Request 2--Effects of the
Project and Related Facilities Evaluated Through an Operations Model;
Request 3--Effects of the Project
[[Page 21557]]
and Related Activities on Fish Passage for Anadromous Fish; Request 4--
Effects of the Project and Related Facilities Hydrology for Anadromous
Fish: Magnitude, Timing, Duration, and Rate of Change; Request 7--
Evaluation of the Upper Tuolumne Habitats for Anadromous Fish; Request
8--Salmon and Steelhead Full Life-Cycle Population Models; and Request
9--Effects of the Project and Related Facilities on Ecosystem/Marine-
Derived Nutrients for Anadromous Fish.
Dated: April 2, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8528 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P