Agency Information Collection Request. 60-Day Public Comment Request, 21562-21563 [2012-8518]
Download as PDF
21562
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 10, 2012 / Notices
Bancorp will control Sound Community
Bank, Seattle, Washington.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, April 5, 2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012–8538 Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier OS–0990–0281]
Agency Information Collection
Request. 60-Day Public Comment
Request
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Secretary (OS), Department
of Health and Human Services, is
publishing the following summary of a
proposed information collection request
for public comment. Interested persons
are invited to send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
AGENCY:
including any of the following subjects:
(1) The necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
To obtain copies of the supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed paperwork collections
referenced above, email your request,
including your address, phone number,
OMB number, and OS document
identifier, to
Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call
the Reports Clearance Office on (202)
690–6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collections must be directed
to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer
at the above email address within 60days.
Proposed Project: Prevention
Communication Formative Research
Revision—OMB No. 0990–0281—Office
of Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion.
Abstract: The information collected
will be used as formative
communication research to provide
guidance to the development and
implementation of its disease
prevention and health promotion
communication and education efforts,
including the Physical Activity and
Dietary Guidelines for Americans. It is
necessary to obtain consumer input to
better understand the informative needs,
attitudes, and beliefs of the audience in
order to tailor messages, as well as to
assist with clarity, understandability,
and acceptance of prototyped messages,
materials, and online tools. This generic
clearance request describes data
collection activities involving a limited
set of focus groups, individual
interviews, Web-based concept and
prototype testing, and usability and
effects testing to establish a deeper
understanding of the interests and needs
of consumers and health intermediaries
for disease prevention and health
promotion information and tools. The
program is requesting a three year
clearance.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Number of
respondents
Average
burden/
response
(in hours)
Number
responses/
respondent
Total response
burden
(in hours)
Data collection task
Instrument/form name
In person, in-depth interviews (consumers
with limited health literacy and/or Spanish
speakers).
Screener ...............................
64
1
10/60
10.7
Interview ...............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
16
16
48
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
24
1.3
8
Interview ...............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
16
16
32
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
24
1.3
5.3
Interview ...............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
16
16
64
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
24
1.3
11
Interview ...............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
16
16
48
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
24
1.3
8
Interview ...............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
16
16
48
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
24
1.3
8
Interview ...............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
16
16
280
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
24
1.3
47
Focus Group .........................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
70
70
210
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
105
5.8
35
Focus Group .........................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
70
70
1
1
1.5
5/60
105
5.8
In person, in-depth interviews (health intermediaries).
In-person, in-depth interviews (public health
professionals).
Remote, in depth interviews (consumers
with limited health literacy and/or Spanish
speakers).
Remote, in depth interviews (health intermediaries).
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Remote, in depth interviews (public health
professionals).
In person focus groups (consumers with
limited health literacy).
In
person focus
mediaries).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
groups
(health
16:26 Apr 09, 2012
inter-
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
21563
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 10, 2012 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE—Continued
Number of
respondents
Average
burden/
response
(in hours)
Number
responses/
respondent
Total response
burden
(in hours)
Data collection task
Instrument/form name
In person focus groups (public health professionals).
Screener ...............................
140
1
10/60
23.3
Focus Group .........................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
70
70
168
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
105
6
28
Focus Group .........................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
42
42
126
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
63
3.5
21
Focus Group .........................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
42
42
84
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
63
3.5
14
Focus Group .........................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
42
42
160
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
63
3.5
27
Usability Test ........................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
40
40
200
1
1
1
1.5
5/60
10/60
60
3.3
33.3
Web-test ...............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
Card Sort ..............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
Card Sort ..............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
Screener ...............................
Web-test ...............................
Confidentiality Agreement ....
50
50
120
30
30
400
100
100
0
115
115
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
5/60
10/60
1.5
5/60
10/60
.5
5/60
0
1
5/60
50
4.2
20
45
2.5
67
50
8.3
0
115
9.6
...............................................
........................
........................
........................
1329.1
Remote focus groups (consumers with limited health literacy and/or Spanish speakers).
Remote focus
mediaries).
groups
(health
inter-
Remote focus groups (public health professionals).
In person usability and prototype testing of
materials (print and Web).
Remote usability, prototype and concept
testing.
In person card sorting ...................................
Web-based card sorting ...............................
Web-based message testing ........................
TOTAL ...................................................
Keith A. Tucker,
Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction
Act Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–8518 Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–32–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Title: Annual Survey of Refugees
(Form ORR–9).
OMB No.: 0970–0033.
Description: The Annual Survey of
Refugees collects information on the
social and economic circumstances of a
random sample of refugees, Amerasians,
and entrants who arrived in the United
States in the five years prior to the date
of the survey. The survey focuses on the
refugees training, labor force
participation, and welfare utilization
rates. Dates are segmented by region of
origin, State of resettlement, and
number of months since arrival. From
the responses, the Office of Refugee
Resettlement reports on the economic
adjustment of refugees to the American
economy. These data are used by
Congress in its annual deliberations for
refugee admissions and funding and by
program managers in formulating
policies for the future direction of the
Refugee Resettlement Program.
Respondents: Refugees, entrants,
Amerasians, and Havana parolees.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
ORR–9 Annual Survey of Refugees ...............................................
Request for Participation Letter .......................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
Number of
responses
per respondent
Number of
respondents
Instrument
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
2,000
2,000
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
Average burden
hours
per response
1
1
10APN1
0.63
0.04
Total burden
hours
1,253.20
80
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21562-21563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8518]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier OS-0990-0281]
Agency Information Collection Request. 60-Day Public Comment
Request
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Secretary (OS),
Department of Health and Human Services, is publishing the following
summary of a proposed information collection request for public
comment. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility
of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of
the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
To obtain copies of the supporting statement and any related forms
for the proposed paperwork collections referenced above, email your
request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, and OS
document identifier, to Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call the
Reports Clearance Office on (202) 690-6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed information collections must be
directed to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer at the above email
address within 60-days.
Proposed Project: Prevention Communication Formative Research
Revision--OMB No. 0990-0281--Office of Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion.
Abstract: The information collected will be used as formative
communication research to provide guidance to the development and
implementation of its disease prevention and health promotion
communication and education efforts, including the Physical Activity
and Dietary Guidelines for Americans. It is necessary to obtain
consumer input to better understand the informative needs, attitudes,
and beliefs of the audience in order to tailor messages, as well as to
assist with clarity, understandability, and acceptance of prototyped
messages, materials, and online tools. This generic clearance request
describes data collection activities involving a limited set of focus
groups, individual interviews, Web-based concept and prototype testing,
and usability and effects testing to establish a deeper understanding
of the interests and needs of consumers and health intermediaries for
disease prevention and health promotion information and tools. The
program is requesting a three year clearance.
Estimated Annualized Burden Table
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Average burden/ Total response
Data collection task Instrument/form Number of responses/ response (in burden (in
name respondents respondent hours) hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In person, in-depth interviews Screener........ 64 1 10/60 10.7
(consumers with limited
health literacy and/or
Spanish speakers).
Interview....... 16 1 1.5 24
Confidentiality 16 1 5/60 1.3
Agreement.
In person, in-depth interviews Screener........ 48 1 10/60 8
(health intermediaries).
Interview....... 16 1 1.5 24
Confidentiality 16 1 5/60 1.3
Agreement.
In-person, in-depth interviews Screener........ 32 1 10/60 5.3
(public health professionals).
Interview....... 16 1 1.5 24
Confidentiality 16 1 5/60 1.3
Agreement.
Remote, in depth interviews Screener........ 64 1 10/60 11
(consumers with limited
health literacy and/or
Spanish speakers).
Interview....... 16 1 1.5 24
Confidentiality 16 1 5/60 1.3
Agreement.
Remote, in depth interviews Screener........ 48 1 10/60 8
(health intermediaries).
Interview....... 16 1 1.5 24
Confidentiality 16 1 5/60 1.3
Agreement.
Remote, in depth interviews Screener........ 48 1 10/60 8
(public health professionals).
Interview....... 16 1 1.5 24
Confidentiality 16 1 5/60 1.3
Agreement.
In person focus groups Screener........ 280 1 10/60 47
(consumers with limited
health literacy).
Focus Group..... 70 1 1.5 105
Confidentiality 70 1 5/60 5.8
Agreement.
In person focus groups (health Screener........ 210 1 10/60 35
intermediaries).
Focus Group..... 70 1 1.5 105
Confidentiality 70 1 5/60 5.8
Agreement.
[[Page 21563]]
In person focus groups (public Screener........ 140 1 10/60 23.3
health professionals).
Focus Group..... 70 1 1.5 105
Confidentiality 70 1 5/60 6
Agreement.
Remote focus groups (consumers Screener........ 168 1 10/60 28
with limited health literacy
and/or Spanish speakers).
Focus Group..... 42 1 1.5 63
Confidentiality 42 1 5/60 3.5
Agreement.
Remote focus groups (health Screener........ 126 1 10/60 21
intermediaries).
Focus Group..... 42 1 1.5 63
Confidentiality 42 1 5/60 3.5
Agreement.
Remote focus groups (public Screener........ 84 1 10/60 14
health professionals).
Focus Group..... 42 1 1.5 63
Confidentiality 42 1 5/60 3.5
Agreement.
In person usability and Screener........ 160 1 10/60 27
prototype testing of
materials (print and Web).
Usability Test.. 40 1 1.5 60
Confidentiality 40 1 5/60 3.3
Agreement.
Remote usability, prototype Screener........ 200 1 10/60 33.3
and concept testing.
Web-test........ 50 1 1 50
Confidentiality 50 1 5/60 4.2
Agreement.
In person card sorting........ Screener........ 120 1 10/60 20
Card Sort....... 30 1 1.5 45
Confidentiality 30 1 5/60 2.5
Agreement.
Web-based card sorting........ Screener........ 400 1 10/60 67
Card Sort....... 100 1 .5 50
Confidentiality 100 1 5/60 8.3
Agreement.
Web-based message testing..... Screener........ 0 0 0 0
Web-test........ 115 1 1 115
Confidentiality 115 1 5/60 9.6
Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL..................... ................ .............. .............. .............. 1329.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith A. Tucker,
Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction Act Reports Clearance
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-8518 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-32-P