Ashish Macwan: Debarment Order, 20638-20639 [2012-8233]
Download as PDF
Tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
20638
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 66 / Thursday, April 5, 2012 / Notices
general, and in relation to their cost,
their impact on related programs, their
effectiveness in targeting for services
under this Act unserved older
individuals with greatest economic need
(including low-income minority
individuals and older individuals
residing in rural areas) and unserved
older individuals with greatest social
need (including low-income minority
individuals and older individuals
residing in rural areas), and their
structure and mechanisms for delivery
of services, including, where
appropriate, comparisons with
appropriate control groups composed of
persons who have not participated in
such programs. Evaluations shall be
conducted by persons not immediately
involved in the administration of the
program or project evaluated’’.
The purpose of this data collection is
to fulfill this requirement and
understand how well this program is
meeting its goals and mission through
the conduct of a process and outcome
evaluation that is a rigorous and
independent assessment of the
Program’s progress, efficiency and
effectiveness. This information
collection will enable AoA to effectively
report its results to the President, to
Congress, to the Department of Health
and Human Services and to the public.
The information will also aid in
program refinement and continuous
improvement.
The evaluation design is comprised of
three primary components:
1. A process study, which examines
the strategies, activities, and resources
of the program at each level of the Aging
Network—State Unit on Aging (SUA),
Area Agency on Aging (AAA), and Local
Service Provider (LSP);
2. A cost study, which determines the
cost per meal by cost category and
program type at the local service
provider level; and
3. A client outcome study, which
examines the health and social effects of
the program on participants compared
to non-participants. Included is an
analysis of the nutrient quality of the
meals provided.
The process study will include all 56
SUAs, a sample of AAAs (N=300), a
sample of local service providers
(N=200), and a sample of program
participants and non-participants
(N=2400). The SUA process component
includes a short faxable data verification
survey which asks the SUA to verify
basic information on topics such as
organization structure, staff and
volunteers and population served and a
survey that covers a variety of topics.
The AAA process component includes a
short faxable survey that focuses on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Apr 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
program funding, staffing, and client
characteristics and a web-based survey
that covers a range of topics. The local
service provider process component
includes a short faxable survey that is
comparable to the AAA faxable survey
and a web-based survey that covers a
range of topics. The cost study will be
conducted with a sample of local
service providers (including AAAs that
provide direct nutrition services) and
includes a data collection tool that asks
about the component costs associated
with meal production and delivery.
The client outcome study includes
subcomponents: (1) A survey of a
matched sample of program participants
and non-participants and consists of an
assessment of health and well-being
outcomes, individual level
characteristics, and program service use
and quality assessments; (2) an
assessment of diet quality using a 24–
Hour Recall of nutrient intake; (3) a
study of healthcare utilization using
linked Medicare files with client data
collected via the initial survey described
above and brief, follow-up interviews to
measure service use over the year
following the initial survey; and (4) an
analysis of the nutrient quality of the
meals provided to program participants
collected from the local service
providers. Data will be collected via
face-to-face interviews with the aid of
Computer Assisted Personal Interview
(CAPI) software. Respondents’ diet
quality and the nutrient content of the
meals provided through the program
will be measured using the USDA’s
Automated Multiple Pass Method
(AMPM) software. Respondents will be
re-contacted at 6 and 12 months via
telephone with a brief survey to
measure frequency of participation in
the Program since the previous
interview.
This information will be used by AoA
to measure how well and under what
circumstances does the OAA Title III–C
Elderly Nutrition Services Program meet
its legislative intent and goals. The
proposed data collection tools may be
found on the AoA Web site at
https://www.aoa.gov/AoARoot/
Program_Results/
Program_Evaluation.aspx.
AoA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
1,432.08 hours for organizations and
3,336.00 hours for individuals for a total
of 4,768.08 hours.
Dated: April 2, 2012.
Kathy Greenlee,
Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 2012–8241 Filed 4–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0330]
Ashish Macwan: Debarment Order
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is issuing an
order under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) debarring
Ashish Macwan for 5 years from
providing services in any capacity to a
person that has an approved or pending
drug product application. FDA bases
this order on a finding that Mr. Macwan
was convicted of one count of
conspiracy to commit an offense against
the United States for conduct relating to
the development and approval,
including the process for development
and approval, of a drug product and to
the regulation of drug products under
the FD&C Act. In addition, the type of
conduct underlying the conviction
undermined the process for the
regulation of drugs. Mr. Macwan was
given notice of the proposed debarment
and an opportunity to request a hearing
within the time frame prescribed by
regulation. Mr. Macwan failed to request
a hearing, which constitutes a waiver of
his right to a hearing concerning this
action.
DATES: This order is effective April 5,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit applications for
termination of debarment to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenny Shade, Office of Regulatory
Affairs (HFC–230), Food and Drug
Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr.,
Element Bldg, Rm. 4144, Rockville, MD
20857, 301–796–4640.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(2)(B)(i)(II))
permits FDA to debar an individual if it
finds that the individual has been
convicted of a conspiracy to commit a
felony under Federal law for conduct
relating to the development or approval,
including the process for development
or approval, of any drug product or
relating to the regulation of any drug
product under the FD&C Act and if FDA
finds that the type of conduct that
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
Tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 66 / Thursday, April 5, 2012 / Notices
served as the basis for the conviction
undermines the process for the
regulation of drugs.
On November 30, 2010, judgment was
entered against Mr. Macwan in the
United District Court for the District of
New Jersey based upon a plea of guilty
to one count of conspiracy to commit an
offense against the United States, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. 371.
FDA’s finding that debarment is
appropriate is based on the felony
conviction referenced herein. The
factual basis for the conviction is as
follows: Mr. Macwan was employed at
Able Laboratories, Inc. (Able) as a
chemist in Able’s Quality Control
Department from in or around mid-1999
through May 2003. In or around January
2005, Mr. Macwan was promoted to
Assistant Manager in the Quality
Control Department and was
responsible for supervising numerous
chemists, monitoring the chemists’
compliance with current Good
Manufacturing Practices, as required by
the FD&C Act and FDA regulations.
Able developed, manufactured, and sold
several generic drug products, including
products for cardiac and psychiatric
conditions and prescription pain
relievers.
From in or around 1999 through on or
about May 19, 2005, Mr. Macwan
conspired to cause the introduction and
delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of a drug that was adulterated
and misbranded, with an intent to
defraud and mislead, contrary to 18
U.S.C. 371, 21 U.S.C. 331(a), and
333(a)(2).
Mr. Macwan and his coconspirators
impaired, impeded, defeated, and
obstructed FDA’s lawful government
function to approve the manufacture
and distribution of generic drug
products by violating Good
Manufacturing Practices; violating
Standards of Procedure by failing to
properly investigate, log, and archive
questionable, aberrant, and
unacceptable laboratory results so that
Able could conceal improprieties and
continue to distribute and sell its drug
products; manipulating and falsifying
testing data and information to conceal
from FDA failing laboratory results
relating to Able’s generic drug products;
creating and maintaining false,
fraudulent, and inaccurate test results to
make it appear that drug products had
the requisite identity, strength, quality,
and purity characteristics so the drug
products could be distributed and sold
to increase Able’s sales and profit; and
creating and maintaining false,
fraudulent, and inaccurate data and
records to obtain FDA approval to
market new product lines.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Apr 04, 2012
Jkt 226001
In furtherance of the conspiracy, in or
around September 2003, Mr. Macwan
falsified and manipulated testing data
relating to the finished product testing
for acetaminophen with codeine
phosphate, a prescription pain relieving
drug product. In addition, in or around
September 2003, Mr. Macwan and his
coconspirators falsified and
manipulated testing data relating to the
finished product testing for
phentermine hydrochloride, a
prescription drug developed to treat
obesity.
As a result of his conviction, on
December 20, 2011, FDA sent Mr.
Macwan a notice by certified mail
proposing to debar him for 5 years from
providing services in any capacity to a
person that has an approved or pending
drug product application. The proposal
was based on a finding, under section
306(b)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the FD&C Act, that
Mr. Macwan was convicted of a
conspiracy under Federal law for
conduct relating to the development and
approval, including the process for
development and approval of a drug
product, and to the regulation of drug
products under the FD&C Act, and the
conduct that served as a basis for the
conviction undermined the process for
the regulation of drugs. The proposal
also offered Mr. Macwan an opportunity
to request a hearing, providing him 30
days from the date of receipt of the letter
in which to file the request, and advised
him that failure to request a hearing
constituted a waiver of the opportunity
for a hearing and of any contentions
concerning this action. Mr. Macwan
failed to request a hearing within the
timeframe prescribed by regulation and,
therefore, has waived his opportunity
for a hearing and waived any
contentions concerning his debarment
(21 CFR Part 12).
II. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Director, Office of
Enforcement, Office of Regulatory
Affairs, under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(II)
of the FD&C Act, under authority
delegated to him (Staff Manual Guide
1410.35), finds that Ashish Macwan has
been convicted of a conspiracy under
Federal law for conduct relating to the
development and approval, including
the process for development and
approval of a drug product, and to the
regulation of drug products under the
FD&C Act, and that the type of conduct
that served as a basis for the conviction
undermined the process for the
regulation of drugs.
As a result of the foregoing finding,
Mr. Macwan is debarred for 5 years from
providing services in any capacity to a
person with an approved or pending
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20639
drug product application under sections
505, 512, or 802 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under
section 351 of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see
DATES), (see sections 306(c)(1)(B),
(c)(2)(A)(iii), and 201(dd) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B),
(c)(2)(A)(iii), and 321(dd))). Any person
with an approved or pending drug
product application who knowingly
employs or retains as a consultant or
contractor, or otherwise uses the
services of Mr. Macwan, in any capacity
during Mr. Macwan’s debarment, will
be subject to civil money penalties
(section 307(a)(6) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If Mr. Macwan
provides services in any capacity to a
person with an approved or pending
drug product application during his
period of debarment he will be subject
to civil money penalties (section
307(a)(7) of the FD&C Act). In addition,
FDA will not accept or review any
abbreviated new drug applications
submitted by or with the assistance of
Mr. Macwan during his period of
debarment (section 306(c)(1)(B) of the
FD&C Act).
Any application by Mr. Macwan for
termination of debarment under section
306(d)(1) of the FD&C Act should be
identified with Docket No. FDA–2009–
N–0330 and sent to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES).
All such submissions are to be filed in
four copies. The public availability of
information in these submissions is
governed by 21 CFR 10.20(j).
Publicly available submissions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 27, 2012.
Armando Zamora,
Acting Director, Office of Enforcement, Office
of Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012–8233 Filed 4–4–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0659]
Shashikant Shah: Debarment Order
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is issuing an
order under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) debarring
Shashikant Shah for 5 years from
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20638-20639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8233]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0330]
Ashish Macwan: Debarment Order
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing an order
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) debarring
Ashish Macwan for 5 years from providing services in any capacity to a
person that has an approved or pending drug product application. FDA
bases this order on a finding that Mr. Macwan was convicted of one
count of conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States for
conduct relating to the development and approval, including the process
for development and approval, of a drug product and to the regulation
of drug products under the FD&C Act. In addition, the type of conduct
underlying the conviction undermined the process for the regulation of
drugs. Mr. Macwan was given notice of the proposed debarment and an
opportunity to request a hearing within the time frame prescribed by
regulation. Mr. Macwan failed to request a hearing, which constitutes a
waiver of his right to a hearing concerning this action.
DATES: This order is effective April 5, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit applications for termination of debarment to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Shade, Office of Regulatory
Affairs (HFC-230), Food and Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr.,
Element Bldg, Rm. 4144, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-4640.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
335a(b)(2)(B)(i)(II)) permits FDA to debar an individual if it finds
that the individual has been convicted of a conspiracy to commit a
felony under Federal law for conduct relating to the development or
approval, including the process for development or approval, of any
drug product or relating to the regulation of any drug product under
the FD&C Act and if FDA finds that the type of conduct that
[[Page 20639]]
served as the basis for the conviction undermines the process for the
regulation of drugs.
On November 30, 2010, judgment was entered against Mr. Macwan in
the United District Court for the District of New Jersey based upon a
plea of guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit an offense against
the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371.
FDA's finding that debarment is appropriate is based on the felony
conviction referenced herein. The factual basis for the conviction is
as follows: Mr. Macwan was employed at Able Laboratories, Inc. (Able)
as a chemist in Able's Quality Control Department from in or around
mid-1999 through May 2003. In or around January 2005, Mr. Macwan was
promoted to Assistant Manager in the Quality Control Department and was
responsible for supervising numerous chemists, monitoring the chemists'
compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices, as required by
the FD&C Act and FDA regulations. Able developed, manufactured, and
sold several generic drug products, including products for cardiac and
psychiatric conditions and prescription pain relievers.
From in or around 1999 through on or about May 19, 2005, Mr. Macwan
conspired to cause the introduction and delivery for introduction into
interstate commerce of a drug that was adulterated and misbranded, with
an intent to defraud and mislead, contrary to 18 U.S.C. 371, 21 U.S.C.
331(a), and 333(a)(2).
Mr. Macwan and his coconspirators impaired, impeded, defeated, and
obstructed FDA's lawful government function to approve the manufacture
and distribution of generic drug products by violating Good
Manufacturing Practices; violating Standards of Procedure by failing to
properly investigate, log, and archive questionable, aberrant, and
unacceptable laboratory results so that Able could conceal
improprieties and continue to distribute and sell its drug products;
manipulating and falsifying testing data and information to conceal
from FDA failing laboratory results relating to Able's generic drug
products; creating and maintaining false, fraudulent, and inaccurate
test results to make it appear that drug products had the requisite
identity, strength, quality, and purity characteristics so the drug
products could be distributed and sold to increase Able's sales and
profit; and creating and maintaining false, fraudulent, and inaccurate
data and records to obtain FDA approval to market new product lines.
In furtherance of the conspiracy, in or around September 2003, Mr.
Macwan falsified and manipulated testing data relating to the finished
product testing for acetaminophen with codeine phosphate, a
prescription pain relieving drug product. In addition, in or around
September 2003, Mr. Macwan and his coconspirators falsified and
manipulated testing data relating to the finished product testing for
phentermine hydrochloride, a prescription drug developed to treat
obesity.
As a result of his conviction, on December 20, 2011, FDA sent Mr.
Macwan a notice by certified mail proposing to debar him for 5 years
from providing services in any capacity to a person that has an
approved or pending drug product application. The proposal was based on
a finding, under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the FD&C Act, that Mr.
Macwan was convicted of a conspiracy under Federal law for conduct
relating to the development and approval, including the process for
development and approval of a drug product, and to the regulation of
drug products under the FD&C Act, and the conduct that served as a
basis for the conviction undermined the process for the regulation of
drugs. The proposal also offered Mr. Macwan an opportunity to request a
hearing, providing him 30 days from the date of receipt of the letter
in which to file the request, and advised him that failure to request a
hearing constituted a waiver of the opportunity for a hearing and of
any contentions concerning this action. Mr. Macwan failed to request a
hearing within the timeframe prescribed by regulation and, therefore,
has waived his opportunity for a hearing and waived any contentions
concerning his debarment (21 CFR Part 12).
II. Findings and Order
Therefore, the Director, Office of Enforcement, Office of
Regulatory Affairs, under section 306(b)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the FD&C Act,
under authority delegated to him (Staff Manual Guide 1410.35), finds
that Ashish Macwan has been convicted of a conspiracy under Federal law
for conduct relating to the development and approval, including the
process for development and approval of a drug product, and to the
regulation of drug products under the FD&C Act, and that the type of
conduct that served as a basis for the conviction undermined the
process for the regulation of drugs.
As a result of the foregoing finding, Mr. Macwan is debarred for 5
years from providing services in any capacity to a person with an
approved or pending drug product application under sections 505, 512,
or 802 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355, 360b, or 382), or under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective (see
DATES), (see sections 306(c)(1)(B), (c)(2)(A)(iii), and 201(dd) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(1)(B), (c)(2)(A)(iii), and 321(dd))). Any
person with an approved or pending drug product application who
knowingly employs or retains as a consultant or contractor, or
otherwise uses the services of Mr. Macwan, in any capacity during Mr.
Macwan's debarment, will be subject to civil money penalties (section
307(a)(6) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If Mr. Macwan
provides services in any capacity to a person with an approved or
pending drug product application during his period of debarment he will
be subject to civil money penalties (section 307(a)(7) of the FD&C
Act). In addition, FDA will not accept or review any abbreviated new
drug applications submitted by or with the assistance of Mr. Macwan
during his period of debarment (section 306(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).
Any application by Mr. Macwan for termination of debarment under
section 306(d)(1) of the FD&C Act should be identified with Docket No.
FDA-2009-N-0330 and sent to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES). All such submissions are to be filed in four copies. The
public availability of information in these submissions is governed by
21 CFR 10.20(j).
Publicly available submissions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 27, 2012.
Armando Zamora,
Acting Director, Office of Enforcement, Office of Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-8233 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P