Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual Specifications, 19991-19994 [2012-7986]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
30 days after receiving comments from
NMFS on the draft report. If no
comments are received from NMFS, the
draft report will be considered to be the
final comprehensive monitoring report.
§ 217.17
Letters of Authorization.
(a) To incidentally take marine
mammals pursuant to these regulations,
CRC must apply for and obtain a LOA.
(b) A LOA, unless suspended or
revoked, may be effective for a period of
time not to exceed the expiration date
of these regulations.
(c) If an LOA expires prior to the
expiration date of these regulations,
CRC must apply for and obtain a
renewal of the LOA.
(d) In the event of projected changes
to the activity or to mitigation and
monitoring measures required by an
LOA, CRC must apply for and obtain a
modification of the LOA as described in
§ 217.18 of this chapter.
(e) The LOA shall set forth:
(1) Permissible methods of incidental
taking;
(2) Means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact (i.e.,
mitigation) on the species, its habitat,
and on the availability of the species for
subsistence uses; and
(3) Requirements for monitoring and
reporting.
(f) Issuance of the LOA shall be based
on a determination that the level of
taking will be consistent with the
findings made for the total taking
allowable under these regulations.
(g) Notice of issuance or denial of a
LOA shall be published in the Federal
Register within 30 days of a
determination.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 217.18 Renewals and Modifications of
Letters of Authorization.
(a) A LOA issued under § 216.106 and
§ 217.17 of this chapter for the activity
identified in § 217.11(a) of this chapter
shall be renewed or modified upon
request by the applicant, provided that:
(1) The proposed specified activity
and mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting measures, as well as the
anticipated impacts, are the same as
those described and analyzed for these
regulations (excluding changes made
pursuant to the adaptive management
provision in § 217.18(c)(1) of this
chapter), and
(2) NMFS determines that the
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
measures required by the previous LOA
under these regulations were
implemented.
(b) For LOA modification or renewal
requests by the applicant that include
changes to the activity or the mitigation,
monitoring, or reporting (excluding
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Apr 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
changes made pursuant to the adaptive
management provision in § 217.18(c)(1)
of this chapter) that do not change the
findings made for the regulations or
result in no more than a minor change
in the total estimated number of takes
(or distribution by species or years),
NMFS may publish a notice of proposed
LOA in the Federal Register, including
the associated analysis illustrating the
change, and solicit public comment
before issuing the LOA.
(c) A LOA issued under § 217.106 and
§ 217.17 of this chapter for the activity
identified in § 217.11(a) of this chapter
may be modified by NMFS under the
following circumstances:
(1) Adaptive Management—NMFS
may modify (including augment) the
existing mitigation, monitoring, or
reporting measures (after consulting
with CRC regarding the practicability of
the modifications) if doing so creates a
reasonable likelihood of more
effectively accomplishing the goals of
the mitigation and monitoring set forth
in the preamble for these regulations.
(i) Possible sources of data that could
contribute to the decision to modify the
mitigation, monitoring, or reporting
measures in an LOA:
(A) Results from CRC’s monitoring
from the previous year(s).
(B) Results from other marine
mammal and/or sound research or
studies.
(C) Any information that reveals
marine mammals may have been taken
in a manner, extent or number not
authorized by these regulations or
subsequent LOAs.
(ii) If, through adaptive management,
the modifications to the mitigation,
monitoring, or reporting measures are
substantial, NMFS will publish a notice
of proposed LOA in the Federal
Register and solicit public comment.
(2) Emergencies—If NMFS determines
that an emergency exists that poses a
significant risk to the well-being of the
species or stocks of marine mammals
specified in § 217.13(b) of this chapter,
an LOA may be modified without prior
notice or opportunity for public
comment. Notice would be published in
the Federal Register within 30 days of
the action.
[FR Doc. 2012–7844 Filed 4–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19991
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 120312182–2170–01]
RIN 0648–XA882
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries;
Annual Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to implement
the annual catch limit (ACL), harvest
guideline (HG), and associated annual
reference points for Pacific sardine in
the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
off the Pacific coast for the fishing
season of January 1, 2012, through
December 31, 2012. This rule is
proposed according to the Coastal
Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The proposed
2012 maximum HG for Pacific sardine is
109,409 metric tons (mt). The proposed
initial overall commercial fishing HG
that is to be allocated across the three
allocation periods for sardine
management is 97,409 mt. This amount
would be divided across the three
seasonal allocation periods for the
directed fishery the following way:
January 1–June 30—33,093 mt; July 1–
September 14—37,964 mt; and
September 15–December 31—23,352 mt
with an incidental set-aside of 1,000 mt
for each of the three periods. This rule
is intended to conserve and manage the
Pacific sardine stock off the U.S. West
Coast.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2012–0055 by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov. To submit
comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal,
first click the ‘‘submit a comment’’ icon,
then enter NOAA–NMFS–2012–0055 in
the keyword search. Locate the
document you wish to comment on
from the resulting list and click on the
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ icon on the right
of that line.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
19992
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
• Fax: (562) 980–4047.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
Copies of the report ‘‘Assessment of
Pacific Sardine Stock for U.S.
Management in 2012’’ and the
Environmental Assessment/Regulatory
Impact Review for this action may be
obtained from the Southwest Regional
Office (see ADDRESSES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Lindsay, Southwest Region,
NMFS, (562) 980–4034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During
public meetings each year, the estimated
biomass for Pacific sardine is presented
to the Pacific Fishery Management
Council’s (Council) Coastal Pelagic
Species (CPS) Management Team
(Team), the Council’s CPS Advisory
Subpanel (Subpanel) and the Council’s
Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC), and the biomass and the status of
the fisheries are reviewed and
discussed. The biomass estimate is then
presented to the Council along with the
calculated overfishing limit (OFL) and
available biological catch (ABC), annual
catch limit (ACL) and harvest guideline
(HG) recommendations and comments
from the Team, Subpanel and SSC.
Following review by the Council and
after hearing public comment, the
Council adopts a biomass estimate and
makes its catch level recommendations
to NMFS.
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to implement the 2012 ACL, HG and
other annual catch reference points,
including an OFL and an ABC that takes
into consideration uncertainty
surrounding the current estimate of
biomass for Pacific sardine in the U.S.
EEZ off the Pacific coast. The CPS FMP
and its implementing regulations
require NMFS to set these annual catch
levels for the Pacific sardine fishery
based on the annual specification
framework in the FMP. This framework
includes a harvest control rule that
determines the maximum HG, the
primary management target for the
fishery, for the current fishing season.
The HG is based, in large part, on the
current estimate of stock biomass. The
harvest control rule in the CPS FMP is
HG = [(Biomass-Cutoff) * Fraction *
Distribution] with the parameters
described as follows:
1. Biomass. The estimated stock
biomass of Pacific sardine age one and
above for the 2012 management season
is 988,385 mt.
2. Cutoff. This is the biomass level
below which no commercial fishery is
allowed. The FMP established this level
at 150,000 mt.
3. Distribution. The portion of the
Pacific sardine biomass estimated in the
EEZ off the Pacific coast is 87 percent
and is based on the average historical
larval distribution obtained from
scientific cruises and the distribution of
the resource according to the logbooks
of aerial fish-spotters.
4. Fraction. The harvest fraction is the
percentage of the biomass above 150,000
mt that may be harvested.
January 1–June
30
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Total Seasonal Allocation ....................................................................................
Incidental Set Aside .............................................................................................
Adjusted Directed Harvest Allocation ..................................................................
Although the 2012 HG is well below
that of the ACL, additional inseason
accountability measures are in place to
ensure the fishery stays within the HG.
If during any of the seasonal allocation
periods the applicable adjusted directed
harvest allocation is projected to be
taken, fishing would be closed to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Apr 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
34,093 (35%)
1,000
33,093
directed harvest and only incidental
harvest would be allowed. For the
remainder of the period, any incidental
Pacific sardine landings would be
counted against that period’s incidental
set-aside. The proposed incidental
fishery would also be constrained to a
30 percent by weight incidental catch
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
At the November 2011 Council
meeting, the Council adopted the 2012
Assessment of the Pacific sardine
resource and a Pacific sardine biomass
estimate of 988,385 mt. Based on
recommendations from its SSC and
other advisory bodies, the Council
recommended and NOAA Fisheries
(NMFS) is proposing, an overfishing
limit of 154,781 mt, an acceptable
biological catch (ABC) of 141,289 mt, an
annual catch limit of 141,289 mt (equal
to the ABC) and a maximum harvest
guideline (HG) (HGs under the CPS FMP
are operationally similar to annual catch
targets (ACT)) of 109,409 metric tons
(mt) for the 2012 Pacific sardine fishing
year. These catch specifications are
based on the most recent stock
assessment and the control rules
established in the CPS FMP.
The Council also recommended, and
NMFS is proposing, that 97,409 mt be
used as the initial overall commercial
fishing HG to be allocated across the
three allocation periods for sardine
management. This number has been
reduced from the maximum HG by
12,000 mt: (i) for potential harvest by
the Quinault Indian Nation of up to
9,000 mt; and (ii) 3,000 mt, which is
initially reserved for potential use under
an exempted fishing permit(s) (EFPs).
The Council also recommended and
NMFS is proposing that incidental catch
set asides be put in place for each
allocation period. The purpose of the
incidental set-aside allotments and
allowance of an incidental catch-only
fishery is to allow for the restricted
incidental landings of Pacific sardine in
other fisheries, particularly other CPS
fisheries, when a seasonal directed
fishery is closed to reduce bycatch and
allow for continued prosecution of other
important CPS fisheries. These
incidental set asides are allocated as
shown in the following table, which
also shows the adjusted directed harvest
levels for each period in metric tons:
July 1–
September 14
38,964 (40%)
1,000
37,964
September 15–
December 31
24,352 (25%)
1,000
23,352
Total
97,409
3,000
94,409
rate when Pacific sardine are landed
with other CPS so as to minimize the
targeting of Pacific sardine. In the event
that an incidental set-aside is projected
to be attained, the incidental fishery
will be closed for the remainder of the
period. If the set-aside is not fully
attained or is exceeded in a given
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
seasonal period, the directed harvest
allocation in the following seasonal
period would automatically be adjusted
upward or downward accordingly to
account for the discrepancy.
Additionally, if during any seasonal
period the directed harvest allocation is
not fully attained or is exceeded, then
the following period’s directed harvest
total would be adjusted to account for
the discrepancy, as well.
If the total HG or these apportionment
levels for Pacific sardine are reached or
are expected to be reached, the Pacific
sardine fishery would be closed until it
re-opens either per the allocation
scheme or at the beginning of the next
fishing season. The NMFS Southwest
Regional Administrator would publish a
notice in the Federal Register
announcing the date of any such
closure.
The Council will hear proposals and
comments on any potential EFPs at the
March 2012 Council meeting, and at the
April 2012 Council meeting it will make
a final recommendation to NMFS on
whether or not all or a portion of the
3,000 mt EFP set-aside should be
allocated for use under any EFP(s).
NMFS will likely make a decision on
whether to issue an EFP for Pacific
sardine sometime prior to the start of
the second seasonal period (July 1,
2012). Any of the 3,000 mt that is not
issued to an EFP will be rolled into the
third allocation period’s directed
fishery. Any set-aside attributed to an
EFP designed to be conducted during
the closed fishing time in the second
allocation period (prior to September
15), but not utilized, will roll into the
third allocation period’s directed
fishery. Any set-aside attributed to an
EFP designed to be conducted during
closed fishing times in the third
allocation, but not utilized, will not be
re-allocated.
In response to a request by the
Quinault Indian Nation for the exclusive
right to harvest Pacific sardine in 2012
in their Usual and Accustomed Fishing
Area off the coast of Washington State,
pursuant to their rights to fish under the
1856 Treaty of Olympia (Treaty with the
Quinault), the Council recommended
and NMFS approved an allocation of
9,000 mt of sardine to the Quinault in
2012. NMFS will consult with Quinault
Department of Fisheries staff and
Quinault Fisheries Policy
representatives on or near September 1,
2012 to review Quinault catch to-date,
Oregon and Washington catch to-date
and any other relevant information in an
attempt to project tribal catch for the
remainder of the season. The purpose of
this consultation will be to determine
whether any part of the 2012 Quinault
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Apr 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
Pacific sardine set-aside of 9,000 mt will
be moved into the non-tribal third
period allocation that begins September
15.
Detailed information on the fishery
and the stock assessment are found in
the report ‘‘Assessment of the Pacific
Sardine Resource in 2011 for U.S.
Management in 2012’’ (see ADDRESSES).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the CPS FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
These proposed specifications are
exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Chief
Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities as
follows:
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to implement the 2012 annual
specifications for Pacific sardine in the
U.S. EEZ off the Pacific coast. The CPS
FMP and its implementing regulations
require NMFS to set an OFL, ABC, ACL
and HG or ACT for the Pacific sardine
fishery based on the harvest control
rules in the FMP. The specific harvest
control rule is applied to the current
stock biomass estimate to derive the
annual HG which is used to manage the
directed commercial take of Pacific
sardine.
The HG is apportioned based on the
following allocation scheme: 35 percent
of the HG is allocated coastwide on
January 1; 40 percent of the HG, plus
any portion not harvested from the
initial allocation is then reallocated
coastwide on July 1; and on September
15 the remaining 25 percent, plus any
portion not harvested from earlier
allocations will be released. If the total
HG or these apportionment levels for
Pacific sardine are reached at any time,
the Pacific sardine fishery will close
until either it re-opens per the allocation
scheme or the beginning of the next
fishing season. There is no limit on the
amount of catch that any single vessel
can take during an allocation period or
the year; the HG and seasonal
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19993
allocations are available until fully
utilized by the entire CPS fleet.
The U.S. Small Business
Administration defines small businesses
engaged in fishing as those vessels with
annual revenues of or below $4 million.
The small entities that would be
affected by the proposed action are the
vessels that compose the West Coast
CPS finfish fleet. Approximately 108
vessels are permitted to operate in the
sardine fishery component of the CPS
fishery off the U.S. West Coast; 64
permits in the Federal CPS limited entry
fishery off California (south of 39 N.
lat.), and a combined 44 permits in
Oregon and Washington’s state Pacific
sardine fisheries. The average annual
per vessel revenue in 2010 for the West
Coast CPS finfish fleet was well below
$4 million; therefore, all of these vessels
therefore are considered small
businesses under the RFA. Because each
affected vessel is a small business, this
proposed rule has an equal effect on all
of these small entities, and therefore
will impact these small entities in the
same manner. Accordingly, there would
be no economic impacts resulting from
disproportionality between small and
large business entities under the
proposed action.
The profitability of these vessels as a
result of this proposed rule is based on
the average Pacific sardine ex-vessel
price per mt. NMFS used average Pacific
sardine ex-vessel price per mt to
conduct a profitability analysis because
cost data for the harvesting operations of
CPS finfish vessels was unavailable.
For the 2011 fishing year the HG was
set at 50,526 mt. Approximately 47,000
mt (28,000 in California and 19,000 in
Oregon and Washington) of this HG
were harvested during the 2011 fishing
season, for an estimated ex-vessel value
of $10 million. Using these figures, the
average 2011 ex-vessel price per mt of
Pacific sardines was approximately
$200.
The proposed HG for the 2012 Pacific
sardine fishing season (January 1, 2012
through December 31) is 109,409 metric
tons (mt). This HG is 66 percent higher
than the HG for 2011. If the fleet were
to take the entire 2012 HG, and
assuming a coastwide average ex-vessel
price per mt of $190 (average of 2010
and 2011 ex-vessel), the potential
revenue to the fleet would be
approximately $21 million. Therefore
the proposed rule will increase small
entities’ profitability compared to last
season, due to the much higher HG this
fishing season. Whether this will occur
will depend somewhat on market forces
within the fishery, and on the regional
availability of the resource to the fleets
and the fleets’ ability to find pure
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
19994
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
schools of Pacific sardine. A change in
the market rate and/or the potential lack
of availability of the resource to the
fleets could cause a reduction in the
amount of Pacific sardine that is
harvested which, in turn, would reduce
the potential total revenue to the fleet
from Pacific sardine. However, due to
the large increase in the HG compared
to last year, even if changes in the
market value occur, the fishery is likely
to see an increase in total revenue
compared last season. Additionally,
unused sardine from the potential EFP
or from the 9,000-mt set-aside for use by
the Quinault Indian Nation, might be
used to supplement the amount
available to the directed fishery of the
third allocation period (September 15
through December 31).
The revenue derived from harvesting
Pacific sardine is also only one factor
determining the overall revenue for a
majority of the vessels in the CPS fleet,
and, therefore, the economic impact to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Apr 02, 2012
Jkt 226001
the fleet from the proposed action
cannot be viewed in isolation. CPS
finfish vessels typically harvest a
number of other species, including
anchovy, mackerel, squid, and tuna,
making Pacific sardine only one
component of a multi-species CPS
fishery. Vessels rely on multiple species
for profitability because each CPS stock
is highly associated with different ocean
conditions and different time periods,
and so are harvested at various times
throughout the year. Because each
species responds to ocean conditions in
its own way, not all CPS stocks are
likely to be abundant at the same time;
therefore as abundance levels and
markets fluctuate, the CPS fishery as a
whole relies on a group of species for
annual revenues. Accordingly, even if
sardine prices drop, such a drop will
have only a small impact, if at all, on
the profits of CPS fishery vessels.
Based on the disproportionality and
profitability analysis above, this rule, if
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
adopted, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of these small entities. As a
result, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis is not required, and none has
been prepared.
There are no reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements required by this proposed
rule. Additionally, no other Federal
rules duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this proposed rule.
This action does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
for purposes of the Paper Reduction Act.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: March 29, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–7986 Filed 4–2–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\03APP1.SGM
03APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 3, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19991-19994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7986]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 120312182-2170-01]
RIN 0648-XA882
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species
Fisheries; Annual Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to implement the annual catch limit (ACL),
harvest guideline (HG), and associated annual reference points for
Pacific sardine in the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the
Pacific coast for the fishing season of January 1, 2012, through
December 31, 2012. This rule is proposed according to the Coastal
Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP). The proposed 2012
maximum HG for Pacific sardine is 109,409 metric tons (mt). The
proposed initial overall commercial fishing HG that is to be allocated
across the three allocation periods for sardine management is 97,409
mt. This amount would be divided across the three seasonal allocation
periods for the directed fishery the following way: January 1-June 30--
33,093 mt; July 1-September 14--37,964 mt; and September 15-December
31--23,352 mt with an incidental set-aside of 1,000 mt for each of the
three periods. This rule is intended to conserve and manage the Pacific
sardine stock off the U.S. West Coast.
DATES: Comments must be received by May 3, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document identified by NOAA-
NMFS-2012-0055 by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov.
To submit comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal, first click the
``submit a comment'' icon, then enter NOAA-NMFS-2012-0055 in the
keyword search. Locate the document you wish to comment on from the
resulting list and click on the ``Submit a Comment'' icon on the right
of that line.
Mail: Submit written comments to Rodney R. McInnis,
Regional Administrator, Southwest Region,
[[Page 19992]]
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
Fax: (562) 980-4047.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above
methods to ensure that the comments are received, documented, and
considered by NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered. All comments received are a part of the public
record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the
sender will be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be
accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
Copies of the report ``Assessment of Pacific Sardine Stock for U.S.
Management in 2012'' and the Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact
Review for this action may be obtained from the Southwest Regional
Office (see ADDRESSES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Lindsay, Southwest Region,
NMFS, (562) 980-4034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During public meetings each year, the
estimated biomass for Pacific sardine is presented to the Pacific
Fishery Management Council's (Council) Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS)
Management Team (Team), the Council's CPS Advisory Subpanel (Subpanel)
and the Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC), and the
biomass and the status of the fisheries are reviewed and discussed. The
biomass estimate is then presented to the Council along with the
calculated overfishing limit (OFL) and available biological catch
(ABC), annual catch limit (ACL) and harvest guideline (HG)
recommendations and comments from the Team, Subpanel and SSC. Following
review by the Council and after hearing public comment, the Council
adopts a biomass estimate and makes its catch level recommendations to
NMFS.
The purpose of this proposed rule is to implement the 2012 ACL, HG
and other annual catch reference points, including an OFL and an ABC
that takes into consideration uncertainty surrounding the current
estimate of biomass for Pacific sardine in the U.S. EEZ off the Pacific
coast. The CPS FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS to set
these annual catch levels for the Pacific sardine fishery based on the
annual specification framework in the FMP. This framework includes a
harvest control rule that determines the maximum HG, the primary
management target for the fishery, for the current fishing season. The
HG is based, in large part, on the current estimate of stock biomass.
The harvest control rule in the CPS FMP is HG = [(Biomass-Cutoff) *
Fraction * Distribution] with the parameters described as follows:
1. Biomass. The estimated stock biomass of Pacific sardine age one
and above for the 2012 management season is 988,385 mt.
2. Cutoff. This is the biomass level below which no commercial
fishery is allowed. The FMP established this level at 150,000 mt.
3. Distribution. The portion of the Pacific sardine biomass
estimated in the EEZ off the Pacific coast is 87 percent and is based
on the average historical larval distribution obtained from scientific
cruises and the distribution of the resource according to the logbooks
of aerial fish-spotters.
4. Fraction. The harvest fraction is the percentage of the biomass
above 150,000 mt that may be harvested.
At the November 2011 Council meeting, the Council adopted the 2012
Assessment of the Pacific sardine resource and a Pacific sardine
biomass estimate of 988,385 mt. Based on recommendations from its SSC
and other advisory bodies, the Council recommended and NOAA Fisheries
(NMFS) is proposing, an overfishing limit of 154,781 mt, an acceptable
biological catch (ABC) of 141,289 mt, an annual catch limit of 141,289
mt (equal to the ABC) and a maximum harvest guideline (HG) (HGs under
the CPS FMP are operationally similar to annual catch targets (ACT)) of
109,409 metric tons (mt) for the 2012 Pacific sardine fishing year.
These catch specifications are based on the most recent stock
assessment and the control rules established in the CPS FMP.
The Council also recommended, and NMFS is proposing, that 97,409 mt
be used as the initial overall commercial fishing HG to be allocated
across the three allocation periods for sardine management. This number
has been reduced from the maximum HG by 12,000 mt: (i) for potential
harvest by the Quinault Indian Nation of up to 9,000 mt; and (ii) 3,000
mt, which is initially reserved for potential use under an exempted
fishing permit(s) (EFPs). The Council also recommended and NMFS is
proposing that incidental catch set asides be put in place for each
allocation period. The purpose of the incidental set-aside allotments
and allowance of an incidental catch-only fishery is to allow for the
restricted incidental landings of Pacific sardine in other fisheries,
particularly other CPS fisheries, when a seasonal directed fishery is
closed to reduce bycatch and allow for continued prosecution of other
important CPS fisheries. These incidental set asides are allocated as
shown in the following table, which also shows the adjusted directed
harvest levels for each period in metric tons:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 1-June July 1- September 15-
30 September 14 December 31 Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Seasonal Allocation.......................... 34,093 (35%) 38,964 (40%) 24,352 (25%) 97,409
Incidental Set Aside............................... 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000
Adjusted Directed Harvest Allocation............... 33,093 37,964 23,352 94,409
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the 2012 HG is well below that of the ACL, additional
inseason accountability measures are in place to ensure the fishery
stays within the HG. If during any of the seasonal allocation periods
the applicable adjusted directed harvest allocation is projected to be
taken, fishing would be closed to directed harvest and only incidental
harvest would be allowed. For the remainder of the period, any
incidental Pacific sardine landings would be counted against that
period's incidental set-aside. The proposed incidental fishery would
also be constrained to a 30 percent by weight incidental catch rate
when Pacific sardine are landed with other CPS so as to minimize the
targeting of Pacific sardine. In the event that an incidental set-aside
is projected to be attained, the incidental fishery will be closed for
the remainder of the period. If the set-aside is not fully attained or
is exceeded in a given
[[Page 19993]]
seasonal period, the directed harvest allocation in the following
seasonal period would automatically be adjusted upward or downward
accordingly to account for the discrepancy. Additionally, if during any
seasonal period the directed harvest allocation is not fully attained
or is exceeded, then the following period's directed harvest total
would be adjusted to account for the discrepancy, as well.
If the total HG or these apportionment levels for Pacific sardine
are reached or are expected to be reached, the Pacific sardine fishery
would be closed until it re-opens either per the allocation scheme or
at the beginning of the next fishing season. The NMFS Southwest
Regional Administrator would publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing the date of any such closure.
The Council will hear proposals and comments on any potential EFPs
at the March 2012 Council meeting, and at the April 2012 Council
meeting it will make a final recommendation to NMFS on whether or not
all or a portion of the 3,000 mt EFP set-aside should be allocated for
use under any EFP(s). NMFS will likely make a decision on whether to
issue an EFP for Pacific sardine sometime prior to the start of the
second seasonal period (July 1, 2012). Any of the 3,000 mt that is not
issued to an EFP will be rolled into the third allocation period's
directed fishery. Any set-aside attributed to an EFP designed to be
conducted during the closed fishing time in the second allocation
period (prior to September 15), but not utilized, will roll into the
third allocation period's directed fishery. Any set-aside attributed to
an EFP designed to be conducted during closed fishing times in the
third allocation, but not utilized, will not be re-allocated.
In response to a request by the Quinault Indian Nation for the
exclusive right to harvest Pacific sardine in 2012 in their Usual and
Accustomed Fishing Area off the coast of Washington State, pursuant to
their rights to fish under the 1856 Treaty of Olympia (Treaty with the
Quinault), the Council recommended and NMFS approved an allocation of
9,000 mt of sardine to the Quinault in 2012. NMFS will consult with
Quinault Department of Fisheries staff and Quinault Fisheries Policy
representatives on or near September 1, 2012 to review Quinault catch
to-date, Oregon and Washington catch to-date and any other relevant
information in an attempt to project tribal catch for the remainder of
the season. The purpose of this consultation will be to determine
whether any part of the 2012 Quinault Pacific sardine set-aside of
9,000 mt will be moved into the non-tribal third period allocation that
begins September 15.
Detailed information on the fishery and the stock assessment are
found in the report ``Assessment of the Pacific Sardine Resource in
2011 for U.S. Management in 2012'' (see ADDRESSES).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the CPS FMP,
other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, and other applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as follows:
The purpose of this proposed rule is to implement the 2012 annual
specifications for Pacific sardine in the U.S. EEZ off the Pacific
coast. The CPS FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS to set
an OFL, ABC, ACL and HG or ACT for the Pacific sardine fishery based on
the harvest control rules in the FMP. The specific harvest control rule
is applied to the current stock biomass estimate to derive the annual
HG which is used to manage the directed commercial take of Pacific
sardine.
The HG is apportioned based on the following allocation scheme: 35
percent of the HG is allocated coastwide on January 1; 40 percent of
the HG, plus any portion not harvested from the initial allocation is
then reallocated coastwide on July 1; and on September 15 the remaining
25 percent, plus any portion not harvested from earlier allocations
will be released. If the total HG or these apportionment levels for
Pacific sardine are reached at any time, the Pacific sardine fishery
will close until either it re-opens per the allocation scheme or the
beginning of the next fishing season. There is no limit on the amount
of catch that any single vessel can take during an allocation period or
the year; the HG and seasonal allocations are available until fully
utilized by the entire CPS fleet.
The U.S. Small Business Administration defines small businesses
engaged in fishing as those vessels with annual revenues of or below $4
million. The small entities that would be affected by the proposed
action are the vessels that compose the West Coast CPS finfish fleet.
Approximately 108 vessels are permitted to operate in the sardine
fishery component of the CPS fishery off the U.S. West Coast; 64
permits in the Federal CPS limited entry fishery off California (south
of 39 N. lat.), and a combined 44 permits in Oregon and Washington's
state Pacific sardine fisheries. The average annual per vessel revenue
in 2010 for the West Coast CPS finfish fleet was well below $4 million;
therefore, all of these vessels therefore are considered small
businesses under the RFA. Because each affected vessel is a small
business, this proposed rule has an equal effect on all of these small
entities, and therefore will impact these small entities in the same
manner. Accordingly, there would be no economic impacts resulting from
disproportionality between small and large business entities under the
proposed action.
The profitability of these vessels as a result of this proposed
rule is based on the average Pacific sardine ex-vessel price per mt.
NMFS used average Pacific sardine ex-vessel price per mt to conduct a
profitability analysis because cost data for the harvesting operations
of CPS finfish vessels was unavailable.
For the 2011 fishing year the HG was set at 50,526 mt.
Approximately 47,000 mt (28,000 in California and 19,000 in Oregon and
Washington) of this HG were harvested during the 2011 fishing season,
for an estimated ex-vessel value of $10 million. Using these figures,
the average 2011 ex-vessel price per mt of Pacific sardines was
approximately $200.
The proposed HG for the 2012 Pacific sardine fishing season
(January 1, 2012 through December 31) is 109,409 metric tons (mt). This
HG is 66 percent higher than the HG for 2011. If the fleet were to take
the entire 2012 HG, and assuming a coastwide average ex-vessel price
per mt of $190 (average of 2010 and 2011 ex-vessel), the potential
revenue to the fleet would be approximately $21 million. Therefore the
proposed rule will increase small entities' profitability compared to
last season, due to the much higher HG this fishing season. Whether
this will occur will depend somewhat on market forces within the
fishery, and on the regional availability of the resource to the fleets
and the fleets' ability to find pure
[[Page 19994]]
schools of Pacific sardine. A change in the market rate and/or the
potential lack of availability of the resource to the fleets could
cause a reduction in the amount of Pacific sardine that is harvested
which, in turn, would reduce the potential total revenue to the fleet
from Pacific sardine. However, due to the large increase in the HG
compared to last year, even if changes in the market value occur, the
fishery is likely to see an increase in total revenue compared last
season. Additionally, unused sardine from the potential EFP or from the
9,000-mt set-aside for use by the Quinault Indian Nation, might be used
to supplement the amount available to the directed fishery of the third
allocation period (September 15 through December 31).
The revenue derived from harvesting Pacific sardine is also only
one factor determining the overall revenue for a majority of the
vessels in the CPS fleet, and, therefore, the economic impact to the
fleet from the proposed action cannot be viewed in isolation. CPS
finfish vessels typically harvest a number of other species, including
anchovy, mackerel, squid, and tuna, making Pacific sardine only one
component of a multi-species CPS fishery. Vessels rely on multiple
species for profitability because each CPS stock is highly associated
with different ocean conditions and different time periods, and so are
harvested at various times throughout the year. Because each species
responds to ocean conditions in its own way, not all CPS stocks are
likely to be abundant at the same time; therefore as abundance levels
and markets fluctuate, the CPS fishery as a whole relies on a group of
species for annual revenues. Accordingly, even if sardine prices drop,
such a drop will have only a small impact, if at all, on the profits of
CPS fishery vessels.
Based on the disproportionality and profitability analysis above,
this rule, if adopted, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of these small entities. As a result, an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required, and none has been
prepared.
There are no reporting, record-keeping, or other compliance
requirements required by this proposed rule. Additionally, no other
Federal rules duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule.
This action does not contain a collection-of-information
requirement for purposes of the Paper Reduction Act.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: March 29, 2012.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-7986 Filed 4-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P