Marc Knapp, Inmate #-06450-015, FCI Safford, P.O. Box 9000, Safford, AZ 85548; Order Denying Export Privileges, 19610-19612 [2012-7803]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
19610
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 63
Monday, April 2, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
U.S. Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Advance Monthly
Retail Trade Survey
U.S. Census Bureau,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
SUMMARY:
To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before June 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–0336,
(or via the Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to: Karla Allen, U.S. Census
Bureau, SSSD HQ–8K183A, 4600 Silver
Hill Road, Washington, DC 20233–6500,
(301) 763–7208 (or via the Internet at
Karla.l.Allen@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
I. Abstract
The Advance Monthly Retail Trade
Survey (MARTS) provides an early
indication of monthly sales for firms
located in the United States and
classified in the Retail Trade or Food
Services sectors as defined by the North
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 Mar 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS).
The MARTS sample is comprised of
approximately 5,000 firms selected from
the larger Monthly Retail Trade Survey
sample of about 12,000 firms (OMB
Control Number: 0607–0717). Firms are
selected into the MARTS sample using
a stratified design where the strata are
defined by industry and size. The
MARTS sample is re-selected, generally
at 21⁄2 to 3 year intervals, to ensure it is
representative of the target population.
The survey requests sales and
e-commerce sales for the month just
ending. If reporting data for a period
other than the calendar month, the
survey asks for the period’s length (4 or
5 weeks) and date on which the period
ended. The survey also asks for the
number of establishments covered by
the data provided and whether or not
the sales data provided are estimates or
more accurate ‘‘book’’ figures.
Survey results are available
approximately 9 working days after the
end of the reference month. The Bureau
of Economic Analysis (BEA) uses the
survey results as critical inputs to the
calculation of the Gross Domestic
Product (GDP). Policymakers such as
the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) need to
have the timeliest estimates in order to
anticipate economic trends and act
accordingly. The Council of Economic
Advisors (CEA) and other government
agencies and businesses use the survey
results to formulate and make decisions
about economic policy. These estimates
have a high priority because of their
timeliness. There would be
approximately a one-month delay in the
availability of these results if the survey
were not conducted.
II. Method of Collection
We will collect this information by
mail, fax, telephone follow-up, and
Internet (during the second half of
2012).
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0607–0104.
Form Number: SM–44(06)A, SM–
44(06)AE, SM–44(06)AS, and SM–
72(06)A.
Type of Review: Regular Submission.
Affected Public: Retail and Food
Services firms in the United States.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,000.
Estimated Time Per Response:
5 minutes.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 5,000.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: The
cost to the respondents for the fiscal
year 2012 is estimated to be $165,750.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13, United
States Code, Section 182.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: March 27, 2012.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–7736 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Marc Knapp, Inmate #—06450–015, FCI
Safford, P.O. Box 9000, Safford, AZ
85548; Order Denying Export
Privileges
On September 13, 2011, in the U.S.
District Court, District of Delaware,
Marc Knapp, (‘‘Knapp’’) was convicted
of one count of violating the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.
(2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’) and one count of
violating Section 38 of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2000))
(‘‘AECA’’). Specifically, Knapp pled
guilty to: knowingly and willfully
attempting to export from the United
States to the Islamic Republic of Iran;
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
causing the attempted export to the
Islamic Republic of Iran; and causing
the attempted supply to the Islamic
Republic of Iran, of an F–5B Tiger II
fighter jet and other defense articles
without obtaining the required
authorization from the Office of Foreign
Assets Control, Department of the
Treasury, in violation of IEEPA. Knapp
also pled guilty to knowingly and
willfully attempting to export from the
United States to the Islamic Republic of
Iran, and causing the attempted export
to the Islamic Republic of Iran, of an F–
5B Tiger II fighter jet and other defense
articles, which are designated as a
defense articles on the United States
Munitions List, without having first
obtained from the Department of State a
license for such exports or written
authorization for such exports, in
violation of the AECA. Knapp was
sentenced to 46 months imprisonment
and ordered to serve three years of
supervised release.
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Exporter Services, in consultation with
the Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the [Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’)], the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. 2410(h). The
denial of export privileges under this
provision may be for a period of up to
10 years from the date of the conviction.
15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8
of the Regulations states that the Bureau
of Industry and Security’s Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730–
774 (2011). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. 2401–
2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 12, 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 50661
(August 16, 2011)), has continued the Regulations
in effect under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.
(2000)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 Mar 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
I have received notice of Knapp’s
conviction for violating IEEPA and
AECA, and have provided notice and an
opportunity for Knapp to make a written
submission to BIS, as provided in
Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I have
not received a submission from Knapp.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Knapp’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of ten years from the date of
Knapp’s conviction. I have also decided
to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to
the Act or Regulations in which Knapp
had an interest at the time of his
conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby
Ordered
I. Until September 13, 2021, Marc
Knapp, with the last known address at:
Inmate #—06450–015, FCI Safford,
P.O. Box 9000, Safford, AZ 85548, and
when acting for or on behalf of Knapp,
his representatives, assigns, agents or
employees (the ‘‘Denied Person’’), may
not, directly or indirectly, participate in
any way in any transaction involving
any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
II. No person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19611
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
III. After notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Knapp by
affiliation, ownership, control or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
subject to the provisions of this Order if
necessary to prevent evasion of the
Order.
IV. This Order does not prohibit any
export, reexport, or other transaction
subject to the Regulations where the
only items involved that are subject to
the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin
technology.
V. This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect until
September 13, 2021.
VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the
Regulations, Knapp may file an appeal
of this Order with the Under Secretary
of Commerce for Industry and Security.
The appeal must be filed within 45 days
from the date of this Order and must
comply with the provisions of Part 756
of the Regulations.
VII. A copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Knapp. This Order shall
be published in the Federal Register.
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
19612
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices
Issued this 27th day of March, 2012.
Bernard Kritzer,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
timely request to revoke in part the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from India
with respect to three exporters.
All deadlines for the submission of
various types of information,
certifications, or comments or actions by
the Department discussed below refer to
the number of calendar days from the
applicable starting time.
[FR Doc. 2012–7803 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–838, A–533–840, A–549–822]
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from Brazil, India, and Thailand: Notice
of Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request
for Revocation of Order in Part
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) received timely requests to
conduct administrative reviews of the
antidumping duty orders on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from
Brazil, India, and Thailand. The
anniversary month of these orders is
February. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221, we are initiating these
administrative reviews. The Department
received a request to revoke one
antidumping duty order in part.
DATES: Effective Date: April 2, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Johnson at (202) 482–4929 (Brazil),
Henry Almond at (202) 482–0049
(India), and Holly Phelps at (202) 482–
0656 (Thailand), AD/CVD Operations,
Office 2, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
During the anniversary month of
February 2012, the Department received
timely requests for administrative
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on shrimp from Brazil, India, and
Thailand from the Ad Hoc Shrimp
Trade Action Committee (hereinafter,
Domestic Producers), the American
Shrimp Processors Association (ASPA),
and certain individual companies, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b). The
Department is now initiating
administrative reviews of these orders
covering multiple companies for Brazil,
India, and Thailand, as noted in the
‘‘Initiation of Reviews’’ section of this
notice. The Department also received a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 Mar 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
Notice of No Sales
If a producer or exporter named in
this notice of initiation had no exports,
sales, or entries during the period of
review (POR), it must notify the
Department within 60 days of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. All submissions must be filed
electronically at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov in accordance with
19 CFR 351.303. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
Such submissions are subject to
verification in accordance with section
782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (Act).
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination in these administrative
reviews, the Department intends to
select respondents based on U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
data for U.S. imports during the POR.
We intend to release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
to all parties having an APO within
seven days of publication of this
initiation notice and to make our
decision regarding respondent selection
within 21 days of publication of this
Federal Register notice. The
Department invites comments regarding
the CBP data and respondent selection
within five days of placement of the
CBP data on the record of the applicable
review.
In general, the Department has found
that determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be
‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
entity for purposes of calculating
antidumping duty rates) require a
substantial amount of detailed
information and analysis, which often
require follow-up questions and
analysis. Accordingly, the Department
will not conduct collapsing analyses at
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the respondent selection phase of these
reviews and will not collapse
companies at the respondent selection
phase unless there has been a
determination to collapse certain
companies in a previous segment of
these antidumping proceedings (i.e.,
investigation, administrative review, or
changed circumstances review) or in a
proceeding under Section 129 of the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act. For
any company subject to these reviews,
if the Department determined, or
continued to treat, that company as
collapsed with others, the Department
will assume that such companies
continue to operate in the same manner
and will collapse them for respondent
selection purposes. Otherwise, the
Department will not collapse companies
for purposes of respondent selection.
Parties are requested to (a) identify
which companies subject to review
previously were collapsed, and (b)
provide a citation to the proceeding in
which they were collapsed.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
party that has requested a review may
withdraw that request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that the Department
may extend this time if it is reasonable
to do so. In order to provide parties
additional certainty with respect to
when the Department will exercise its
discretion to extend this 90-day
deadline, interested parties are advised
that, with regard to reviews requested
on the basis of anniversary months on
or after August 2011, the Department
does not intend to extend the 90-day
deadline unless the requestor
demonstrates that an extraordinary
circumstance has prevented it from
submitting a timely withdrawal request.
Determinations by the Department to
extend the 90-day deadline will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
Initiation of Reviews
In accordance with section 751(a)(1)
of the Act, we are initiating
administrative reviews of the
antidumping duty orders on shrimp
from Brazil, India and Thailand. We
intend to issue the final results of these
reviews by February 28, 2013.
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19610-19612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7803]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Marc Knapp, Inmate --06450-015, FCI Safford, P.O. Box
9000, Safford, AZ 85548; Order Denying Export Privileges
On September 13, 2011, in the U.S. District Court, District of
Delaware, Marc Knapp, (``Knapp'') was convicted of one count of
violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701 et seq. (2000)) (``IEEPA'') and one count of violating Section 38
of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2000)) (``AECA'').
Specifically, Knapp pled guilty to: knowingly and willfully attempting
to export from the United States to the Islamic Republic of Iran;
[[Page 19611]]
causing the attempted export to the Islamic Republic of Iran; and
causing the attempted supply to the Islamic Republic of Iran, of an F-
5B Tiger II fighter jet and other defense articles without obtaining
the required authorization from the Office of Foreign Assets Control,
Department of the Treasury, in violation of IEEPA. Knapp also pled
guilty to knowingly and willfully attempting to export from the United
States to the Islamic Republic of Iran, and causing the attempted
export to the Islamic Republic of Iran, of an F-5B Tiger II fighter jet
and other defense articles, which are designated as a defense articles
on the United States Munitions List, without having first obtained from
the Department of State a license for such exports or written
authorization for such exports, in violation of the AECA. Knapp was
sentenced to 46 months imprisonment and ordered to serve three years of
supervised release.
Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR'' or
``Regulations'') \1\ provides, in pertinent part, that ``[t]he Director
of the Office of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director
of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of
any person who has been convicted of a violation of the [Export
Administration Act (``EAA'')], the EAR, or any order, license or
authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order
issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.
1701-1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal
Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).'' 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also
Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. 2410(h). The denial of export
privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10 years
from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the Regulations states that
the Bureau of Industry and Security's Office of Exporter Services may
revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security (``BIS'') licenses
previously issued in which the person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730-774 (2011). The Regulations
issued pursuant to the Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app.
2401-2420 (2000)) (``EAA''). Since August 21, 2001, the EAA has been
in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by
successive Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of
August 12, 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 50661 (August 16, 2011)), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. (2000)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have received notice of Knapp's conviction for violating IEEPA
and AECA, and have provided notice and an opportunity for Knapp to make
a written submission to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of the
Regulations. I have not received a submission from Knapp. Based upon my
review and consultations with BIS's Office of Export Enforcement,
including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I have decided
to deny Knapp's export privileges under the Regulations for a period of
ten years from the date of Knapp's conviction. I have also decided to
revoke all licenses issued pursuant to the Act or Regulations in which
Knapp had an interest at the time of his conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby
Ordered
I. Until September 13, 2021, Marc Knapp, with the last known
address at:
Inmate --06450-015, FCI Safford, P.O. Box 9000, Safford,
AZ 85548, and when acting for or on behalf of Knapp, his
representatives, assigns, agents or employees (the ``Denied Person''),
may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be
exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations,
including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
II. No person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
III. After notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation,
or business organization related to Knapp by affiliation, ownership,
control or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or
related services may also be subject to the provisions of this Order if
necessary to prevent evasion of the Order.
IV. This Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved
that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced direct
product of U.S.-origin technology.
V. This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect
until September 13, 2021.
VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Knapp may file
an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the
date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of
the Regulations.
VII. A copy of this Order shall be delivered to the Knapp. This
Order shall be published in the Federal Register.
[[Page 19612]]
Issued this 27th day of March, 2012.
Bernard Kritzer,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-7803 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
