Safety Zone; Wedding Fireworks Display, Boston Inner Harbor, Boston, MA, 19573-19575 [2012-7782]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Mark Cutter,
Coast Guard Sector Boston Waterways
Management Division, telephone 617–
223–4000, email
Mark.E.Cutter@uscg.mil or Lieutenant
Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt, Coast Guard
First District Waterways Management
Branch, telephone 617–223–8385, email
Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: March 13, 2012.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2012–7790 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0130]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Wedding Fireworks
Display, Boston Inner Harbor, Boston,
MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Boston Inner
Harbor in the vicinity of Anthony’s Pier
4, Boston, MA for a wedding fireworks
display. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 2, 2012. Requests for
public meetings must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before April 9, 2012.
The Coast Guard anticipates that this
proposed rule will be effective from 8
p.m. to 11 p.m. on May 19, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0130 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 Mar 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.
regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2012–0130),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://www.
regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. If you submit a comment
online via www.regulations.gov, it will
be considered received by the Coast
Guard when you successfully transmit
the comment. If you fax, hand deliver,
or mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2012–0130’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19573
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2012–
0130’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one by using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter
701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to establish safety zones.
This proposed safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels from hazards
associated with the fireworks display.
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
19574
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Discussion of Proposed Rule
Ocean State Pyrotechnics, Inc is
sponsoring a wedding fireworks display
on the waters of Boston Inner Harbor in
the vicinity of Anthony’s Pier 4, Boston,
MA. The Captain of the Port (COTP)
Boston has determined that fireworks
displays in close proximity to watercraft
and waterfront structures pose a
significant risk to public safety and
property. Such hazards include
obstructions to the waterway that may
cause marine casualties and the
explosive danger of fireworks and debris
falling into the water that may cause
death or serious bodily harm.
Establishing a safety zone around the
location of this fireworks event will
help ensure the safety of spectators,
vessels and other property and help
minimize the associated risks. This
proposed safety zone will encompass a
450-foot radius around the firework
barge.
The fireworks display will occur from
approximately 8:30 p.m. until 10:30
p.m. on May 19, 2012. To ensure public
safety the proposed safety zone will be
enforced immediately before, during,
and immediately after the fireworks
launch. If the event is cancelled due to
inclement weather, then the proposed
safety zone will not be enforced.
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the COTP or the
designated on-scene representative.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the regulated area is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP or the
designated on-scene representative. The
COTP Boston or the on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
The Final Rule will not be published
30 days before the event and the
effective date of this proposed rule as is
generally required by 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
The Coast Guard will accept comments
on this shortened period and address
them in the final rule.
Public notifications will be made
prior to the event via appropriate
means, and may include the Local
Notice to Mariners and marine
information broadcasts.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 Mar 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
This determination is based on the
limited time that vessels will be
restricted from the fireworks display
area. The safety zone will be in effect for
approximately three hours during the
evening hours. The Coast Guard expects
minimal adverse impact to mariners
from the activation of the zone as
information on the event will be
extensively advertised in the public,
affected mariners may request
authorization from the COTP or the
designated on-scene representative to
transit the zone, and advance
notification will be made to the
maritime community via Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: The owners and
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the Boston
Inner Harbor in the vicinity of
Anthony’s Pier 4, Boston, MA during
the effective period.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule will be
in effect for only three hours on a single
day during the late evening and vessels
will be able to transit around the safety
zone. Before the effective period, we
will issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the waterway.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have significant
economic impact on it, please submit a
comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
why you think it qualifies and how and
to what degree this rule would
economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact 1–888–REG–
FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves establishment of a safety zone
on the waters of the East River during
a firework works display. This rule
appears to be categorically excluded,
under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Commandant Instruction.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:44 Mar 30, 2012
Jkt 226001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
19575
of the Port Boston (COTP) to act on the
COTP’s behalf.
(c) Effective Period. This rule will be
effective and will be enforced from
8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on May 19, 2012.
(d) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.23, as well as the
following regulations, apply.
(2) No vessels, except for fireworks
barge and accompanying vessels, will be
allowed to enter into, transit, or anchor
within the safety zone without the
permission of the COTP or the
designated on-scene representative.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
COTP or the designated on-scene
representative. Upon being hailed by a
U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the regulated area
shall contact the COTP or the
designated on-scene representative via
VHF channel 16 or 617–223–3201
(Sector Boston Command Center) to
obtain permission.
(5) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the regulated area
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated onscene representative.
Dated: March 15, 2012.
J.N. Healey,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Boston.
[FR Doc. 2012–7782 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am]
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Public
Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0130 to read as
follows:
§ 165.T01–0130 Safety Zone; Wedding
Fireworks Display, Boston Inner Harbor,
Boston, MA.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a temporary safety zone: All navigable
waters from surface to bottom, within a
450-foot radius of position 42°21′19″ N,
071°02′32″ W. This position is located
approximately 450-feet off of Anthony’s
Pier 4, Boston Inner Harbor Boston, MA.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section ‘‘Designated on-scene
representative’’ is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47 CFR Part 27
[WT Docket No. 12–69; FCC 12–31]
Promoting Interoperability in the 700
MHz Commercial Spectrum;
Interoperability of Mobile User
Equipment Across Paired Commercial
Spectrum Blocks in the 700 MHz Band
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission seeks comment on whether
the customers of Lower 700 MHz B and
C Block licensees would experience
harmful interference—and if so, to what
degree—if the Lower 700 MHz band
were interoperable. The Commission
also explores the next steps should it
find that interoperability would cause
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19573-19575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7782]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0130]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Wedding Fireworks Display, Boston Inner Harbor,
Boston, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the navigable waters of the Boston Inner Harbor in the vicinity of
Anthony's Pier 4, Boston, MA for a wedding fireworks display. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to protect spectators and vessels
from the hazards associated with fireworks displays.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 2, 2012. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before April 9, 2012. The Coast Guard
anticipates that this proposed rule will be effective from 8 p.m. to 11
p.m. on May 19, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0130 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. Mark Cutter, Coast Guard Sector Boston
Waterways Management Division, telephone 617-223-4000, email
Mark.E.Cutter@uscg.mil or Lieutenant Junior Grade Isaac Slavitt, Coast
Guard First District Waterways Management Branch, telephone 617-223-
8385, email Isaac.M.Slavitt@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing
or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0130), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2012-0130'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2012-0130'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one by using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize
the Coast Guard to establish safety zones.
This proposed safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels from hazards associated with the fireworks
display.
[[Page 19574]]
Discussion of Proposed Rule
Ocean State Pyrotechnics, Inc is sponsoring a wedding fireworks
display on the waters of Boston Inner Harbor in the vicinity of
Anthony's Pier 4, Boston, MA. The Captain of the Port (COTP) Boston has
determined that fireworks displays in close proximity to watercraft and
waterfront structures pose a significant risk to public safety and
property. Such hazards include obstructions to the waterway that may
cause marine casualties and the explosive danger of fireworks and
debris falling into the water that may cause death or serious bodily
harm. Establishing a safety zone around the location of this fireworks
event will help ensure the safety of spectators, vessels and other
property and help minimize the associated risks. This proposed safety
zone will encompass a 450-foot radius around the firework barge.
The fireworks display will occur from approximately 8:30 p.m. until
10:30 p.m. on May 19, 2012. To ensure public safety the proposed safety
zone will be enforced immediately before, during, and immediately after
the fireworks launch. If the event is cancelled due to inclement
weather, then the proposed safety zone will not be enforced.
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
COTP or the designated on-scene representative. Entry into, transiting,
or anchoring within the regulated area is prohibited unless authorized
by the COTP or the designated on-scene representative. The COTP Boston
or the on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
The Final Rule will not be published 30 days before the event and
the effective date of this proposed rule as is generally required by 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The Coast Guard will accept comments on this
shortened period and address them in the final rule.
Public notifications will be made prior to the event via
appropriate means, and may include the Local Notice to Mariners and
marine information broadcasts.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
This determination is based on the limited time that vessels will
be restricted from the fireworks display area. The safety zone will be
in effect for approximately three hours during the evening hours. The
Coast Guard expects minimal adverse impact to mariners from the
activation of the zone as information on the event will be extensively
advertised in the public, affected mariners may request authorization
from the COTP or the designated on-scene representative to transit the
zone, and advance notification will be made to the maritime community
via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the Boston Inner Harbor
in the vicinity of Anthony's Pier 4, Boston, MA during the effective
period.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will be in effect for only three hours on a single day during the
late evening and vessels will be able to transit around the safety
zone. Before the effective period, we will issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the waterway.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-
888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
[[Page 19575]]
Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination will be
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves establishment of a safety zone on the waters of the East
River during a firework works display. This rule appears to be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Commandant Instruction.
We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0130 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0130 Safety Zone; Wedding Fireworks Display, Boston
Inner Harbor, Boston, MA.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a temporary safety zone:
All navigable waters from surface to bottom, within a 450-foot radius
of position 42[deg]21'19'' N, 071[deg]02'32'' W. This position is
located approximately 450-feet off of Anthony's Pier 4, Boston Inner
Harbor Boston, MA.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section ``Designated on-scene
representative'' is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port Boston
(COTP) to act on the COTP's behalf.
(c) Effective Period. This rule will be effective and will be
enforced from 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. on May 19, 2012.
(d) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23, as well as
the following regulations, apply.
(2) No vessels, except for fireworks barge and accompanying
vessels, will be allowed to enter into, transit, or anchor within the
safety zone without the permission of the COTP or the designated on-
scene representative.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the COTP or the designated on-scene representative. Upon being hailed
by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
regulated area shall contact the COTP or the designated on-scene
representative via VHF channel 16 or 617-223-3201 (Sector Boston
Command Center) to obtain permission.
(5) Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the
regulated area must comply with all directions given to them by the
COTP or the designated on-scene representative.
Dated: March 15, 2012.
J.N. Healey,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Boston.
[FR Doc. 2012-7782 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P