Draft NPDES General Permit for Discharges From the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category to Coastal Waters in Texas (TXG330000), 19282-19284 [2012-7686]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
19282
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices
Proposed Land Exchange for the
Purpose of Construction of a Road
between Communities of King Cove
and Cold Bay, USACE Section 10 and
404 Permits, AK, Comment Period
Ends: 05/18/2012, Contact: Stephanie
Brady 907–786–3357.
EIS No. 20120082, Final EIS, USFS, OR,
Snow Basin Vegetation Management
Project, Proposal to Implementing
Commercial Harvest of Timber, Post
Harvest Non-commercial Thinning,
Whitman Ranger District, WallowaWhitman Forest, Baker County, OR,
Review Period Ends: 04/30/2012,
Contact: Dea Nelson 541–523–6391.
EIS No. 20120083, Final Supplement,
BLM, NV, Upper Las Vegas Wash
Conservation Transfer Area (CTA),
Propose to Establish a Final
Boundary, Implementation, Clark
County, NV, Review Period Ends: 04/
30/2012, Contact: Gayle Marrs-Smith
702–515–5156.
EIS No. 20120084, Final EIS, USFS, FL,
City of Tallahassee Southwestern
Transmission Line Project, Proposes
to Construct, Operate and Maintain a
New Overhead 230-kilovolt (kV),
Electric Transmission Line, SpecialUse-Permit (SUP), Apalachicola
National Forest (ANF), Leon County,
FL, Review Period Ends: 04/30/2012,
Contact: Harold Shenk 850–926–3561.
EIS No. 20120085, Final EIS, USN, WA,
Trident Support Facilities Explosives
Handling Wharf (EHW–2), New
Information, Construction and
Operating, Naval Base Kitsap Bangor,
Silverdale, WA, Review Period Ends:
04/30/2012, Contact: Christine
Stevenson 360–396–0080.
EIS No. 20120086, Draft EIS, DOE, CO,
Granby Pumping Plant Switchyard—
Windy Gap Substation Transmission
Line Rebuild, To Replace Existing
Transmission Line with Double
Circuit Transmission, Grand County,
CO, Comment Period Ends: 05/29/
2012, Contact: Jim Hartman 720–962–
7255.
EIS No. 20120087, Draft EIS, USFS, OR,
Eden Ridge Timber Sales,
Implementation, Powers Ranger
District, Rogue River-Siskiyou
National Forest, Coos County, OR,
Comment Period Ends: 05/14/2012,
Contact: Wesley Crum 541–439–6200.
EIS No. 20120088, Second Draft EIS
(Tiering), FHWA, IL, TIER 2—Elgin
O’Hare—West Bypass, Extending the
Planning Period from 2030 to 2040,
Federal Approvals and Funding, Cook
and DuPage Counties, IL, Comment
Period Ends: 05/14/2012, Contact:
Norman Stoner 217–492–4600.
The U.S. Department of
Transportation’s Federal Highway
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
Administration and the Federal
Aviation Administration are Joint Lead
agencies for this project.
EIS No. 20120089, Final EIS, USFS, CA,
Greys Mountain Ecological
Restoration Project, Proposed Forest
Management Treatments to Reduce
Fire Hazard and Restore Forest
Health, Sierra National Forest, Bass
Lake Ranger District, Madera and
Mariposa Counties, CA, Review Period
Ends: 04/30/2012, Contact: Burt
Stalter 559–887–2218 ext. 3208.
EIS No. 20120090, Draft EIS, USAF, AK,
Modernization and Enhancement of
Ranges, Airspace, and Training Areas
in the Joint Pacific Alaska Range
Complex, AK, Comment Period Ends:
06/07/2012, Contact: Mark Peterson
808–449–1078.
The U.S. Army and the U.S. Air Force
are Joint Lead agencies for this project.
EIS No. 20120091, Second Draft
Supplement, BLM, AK, National
Petroleum Reserve -Alaska (NPR–A)
Integrated Activity Plan, To
Determine Appropriate Management
for BLM–Administrated Lands in the
NPR–A, North Slope Borough, AK,
Comment Period Ends: 05/29/2012,
Contact: Jim Ducker 907–271–3130.
EIS No. 20120092, Final EIS, USACE,
LA, Louisiana Coastal Area Barataria
Basin Barrier Shoreline Restoration,
To Restore the Barrier Shoreline
Ecosystem and Significantly Reduce
the Loss of Estuarine and Freshwater
Wetlands, Caminada Headland in
Lafourche and Jefferson Parishes and
Shell Islands in Plaquemines Parish,
LA, Review Period Ends: 04/30/2012,
Contact: Dr. William P. Klein, Jr. 504–
862–2540.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20110440, Revised Draft EIS,
USFS, ID, Idaho Panhandle National
Forests, Land Management Plan,
Revises the 1987 Forest Plan,
Implementation, Boundary, Bonner,
Kootenai, Benewah, and Shoshone
Counties, ID and Pend Oreille County,
WA, Comment Period Ends: 05/07/
2012, Contact: Mary Farnsworth 208–
765–7223. Revision to FR Notice
Published 01/13/2012; Extending
Comment Period from 04/4/2012 to
05/07/2012.
EIS No. 20110441, Revised Draft EIS,
USFS, MT, Kootenai National Forest
Land Management Plan, Revises the
1987 Forest Plan, Implementation,
Lincoln, Sanders, Flathead Counties,
MT and Bonner and Boundary
Counties, ID, Comment Period Ends:
04/04/2012, Contact: Paul Bradford
406–293–6211.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Revision to FR Notice Published 01/
06/2012; Extending Comment Period
from 04/04/2012 to 05/07/2012.
EIS No. 20120028, Draft EIS, USACE,
CA, Clearwater Program, To Meet the
Wastewater Management Needs of the
Joint Outfall System (JOS) Through
the Year 2050, Near San Pedro,
Section 404 Permit, Los Angeles
County, CA, Comment Period Ends:
04/10/2012, Contact: Dr. Aaron O.
Allen 805–585–2148.
Revision to FR Notice Published
2/10/2012; Comment Period Ends 04/
10/2012.
Dated: March 27, 2012.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2012–7690 Filed 3–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9650–8]
Draft NPDES General Permit for
Discharges From the Oil and Gas
Extraction Point Source Category to
Coastal Waters in Texas (TXG330000)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposal of NPDES General
Permit Renewal.
AGENCY:
EPA Region 6 today proposes
a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) general
permit regulating discharges from oil
and gas wells in the Coastal Subcategory
in Texas and in the Stripper
Subcategory which discharge into
coastal waters in Texas.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent
to: Ms. Diane Smith (6WQ–NP), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202–2733.
Comments may also be submitted via
EMAIL to the following address:
smith.diane@epa.gov.
SUMMARY:
Public Meeting/Public Hearing
Information
A public meeting and a public hearing
on the proposed permit will be held at
the times and place below. The meeting
will include a presentation on the
proposed permit followed by the
opportunity for questions and answers.
The public hearing will be held in
accordance with the requirements of 40
CFR 124.12. At the public hearing, any
person may submit oral or written
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices
statements and data concerning the
proposed permit. Any person who
cannot attend the public hearing may
still submit written comments, which
have the same weight as comments
made at the public hearing, through the
end of the public comment period.
Date: April 11, 2012.
Time: Public meeting starts at 2 p.m.
and public hearing starts at 3:30 p.m.
Place: Houston Marriott South Hobby
Airport, Galveston Room, 9100 Gulf
Freeway, Houston, TX 77017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Diane Smith, Region 6, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Telephone: (214) 665–2145.
A complete draft permit and a fact
sheet more fully explaining the proposal
may be obtained online from the Web
site below or from Ms. Smith. In
addition, the Agency’s current
administrative record on the proposal is
available for examination at the Region’s
Dallas offices during normal working
hours after providing Ms. Smith 24
hours advance notice. A copy of the
proposed permit, fact sheet, and this
Federal Register Notice may be found
on the EPA Region 6 Web site at:
https://www.epa.gov/region6/water/
npdes/genpermit/index.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
permit prohibits the discharge of
drilling fluid, drill cuttings, produced
sand and well treatment, completion
and workover fluids. Discharges of
dewatering effluents from reserve pits
are also proposed to be prohibited.
Produced water discharges are
prohibited, except from wells in the
Stripper Subcategory located east of the
98th meridian whose produced water
comes from the Carrizo/Wilcox, Reklaw
or Bartosh formations in Texas as
authorized by the expiring permit. The
discharge of deck drainage, formation
test fluids, sanitary waste, domestic
waste and miscellaneous discharges is
authorized. More stringent requirements
are proposed to regulate discharges to
water quality-impaired waterbodies.
Pursuant to the section 316(b) of the
Clean Water Act (CWA), requirements
for new facilities are also proposed in
this permit. Major changes also include
definition of ‘‘operator’’, acute toxicity
test for produced water, spill prevention
best management practices, and
electronic reporting requirements.
Proposed changes and rationales for
those changes are described in the fact
sheet. To obtain discharge
authorization, operators of such
facilities must submit a new Notice of
Intent (NOI). To determine whether
your facility, company, business,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
organization, etc. is regulated by this
action, you should carefully examine
the applicability criteria in Part I,
Section A.1 of this permit. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Other Legal Requirements
A. State Certification
Under section 401(a)(1) of the CWA,
EPA may not issue an NPDES permit
until the State in which the discharge
will occur grants or waives certification
to ensure compliance with appropriate
requirements of the CWA and State law.
EPA will seek certification from the
Railroad Commission of Texas prior to
issuing a final permit.
B. Coastal Zone Management Act
The Coastal Zone Management Act
and its implementing regulations (15
CFR 930) require that any Federally
licensed or permitted activity affecting
the coastal zone of a state with an
approved Coastal Zone Management
Program be consistent with that
Program. EPA has concluded, based on
the conditions, limitations and
prohibitions of this permit that the
discharges associated with this permit
are consistent with the Texas Coastal
Management Program goals and
policies. EPA previously received a
consistency determination from the
Texas Coastal Coordination Council on
February 7, 2007. EPA is seeking a
consistency determination prior to
issuing this permit reissuance.
C. National Environmental Policy Act
EPA’s regulations at 40 CFR part 6,
subpart F, which implement the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C., 4331, et seq.,
provide the procedures for carrying out
the NEPA environmental review process
for the issuance of new source NPDES
permits. The purpose of this review
process is to determine if any significant
environmental impacts are anticipated
by issuance of NPDES permits
authorizing discharges from new
sources. EPA prepared an
environmental assessment (EA) in
accordance with 40 CFR 6.604 when the
previous permit was drafted. EPA is
working on a supplemental information
report (SIR) and tentatively determines,
based on information available, that
there will be no significant impact as
the result of reissuing this permit. EPA
will make the final SIR on EPA’s Web
site https://www.epa.gov/region6/water/
npdes/genpermit/index.htm when it
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19283
becomes available prior to the
reissuance of the final permit.
D. Endangered Species Act
When EPA issued the previous Permit
TXG330000, effective October 21, 1993,
covering existing sources, but not New
Sources, the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS) concurred with
EPA’s finding that the permit was
unlikely to adversely affect any
threatened or endangered species or
their critical habitat. When EPA issued
Permit TXG290000, effective February
8, 1995, the Service also concurred with
EPA’s finding that the permit was
unlikely to adversely affect any
threatened or endangered species or
their critical habitat. The Region found
that adding New Source coverage to the
permit is also unlikely to adversely
affect any threatened or endangered
species or its critical habitat. EPA
received written concurrence from the
FWS on May 2, 2001, and from the
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) on May 1, 2001, on that
determination. EPA proposes to add
more requirements, such as
characterization study for produced
water, intake velocity limit for cooling
water intake structures from new
facilities, and etc., to the current permit.
EPA has been working on a biological
evaluation (BE) update to evaluate the
effects of this permitting action on
federally listed endangered and
threatened species.
E. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
The 1996 amendments to the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act set
forth a new mandate to identify and
protect important marine and
anadromous fisheries habitats. The
purpose of addressing habitat in this act
is to further the goal of maintaining
sustainable fisheries. Guidance and
procedures for implementing these
amendments are contained in National
Marine Fisheries Service regulations
(50 CFR 600.805–600.930). These
regulations specify that any Federal
agency that authorizes or proposes to
authorize an activity which would
adversely affect an Essential Fish
Habitat is subject to the consultation
provisions of the Manguson-Stevens
Act. The Texas Coastal Subcategory
areas covered by this general permit
include Essential Fish Habitat
designated under the Magnuson-Stevens
Act.
The Region previously found that
issuance of the general permit would be
unlikely to adversely affect Essential
Fish Habitat. EPA received written
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
19284
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices
concurrence from NMFS on that
determination by a letter dated January
10, 2007, when EPA reissued the
expiring permit in 2007. Because there
are no changes which make the permit
less stringent through this action, EPA
again finds that its issuance is unlikely
to adversely affect Essential Fish
Habitat. EPA is seeking concurrence
with that decision from NMFS.
F. Historic Preservation Act
Facilities which adversely affect
properties listed or eligible for listing in
the National Register of Historical
Places are not authorized to discharge
under this permit.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection required
by this permit has been approved by
OMB under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., in submission made for the
NPDES permit program and assigned
OMB control numbers 2040–0086
(NPDES permit application) and 2040–
0004 (discharge monitoring reports).
Because this permit authorizes limited
discharges, the reporting time for
discharges is less than that for
permittees discharging under the
Territorial Seas of Texas (TXG260000)
or to Outer Continental Shelf
(GMG290000) permits. Also, this
proposed permit requires electronic
reporting for discharge monitoring
reports, so it will save some reporting
time and paper mailing costs.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
H. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 USC
601 et seq, requires that EPA prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for
regulations that have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This permit is not a ‘‘rule’’
subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
EPA prepared a regulatory flexibility
analysis, however, on the promulgation
of the Coastal Subcategory guidelines on
which many of the permit’s effluent
limitations are based. That analysis
shows that compliance with the permit
requirements will not result in a
significant impact on dischargers,
including small businesses, covered by
this permit. EPA Region 6, therefore,
concludes that the permit being
proposed today will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Dated: March 19, 2012.
William K. Honker,
Acting Director, Water Quality Protection
Division, EPA Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012–7686 Filed 3–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9654–5]
Proposed CERCLA Administrative
Settlement; George L. Gomez and
Patricia A. Gomez.
Environmental Protection
Agency
ACTION: Notice; request for public
comment
AGENCY:
In accordance with Section
122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, as
amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C.
9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of a
proposed administrative settlement for
the Terrible Mine Site, Isle Mining
District, Custer County, Colorado with
George L. Gomez and Patricia A. Gomez
based upon an inability to pay
settlement. The settlement includes a
covenant not to sue the settling party
pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA,
42 U.S.C. 9607(a), and provides that the
settling parties will sign and execute an
environmental covenant on the Site. For
thirty (30) days following the date of
publication of this notice, the agency
will receive written comments relating
to the settlement. The agency will
consider all comments received and
may modify or withdraw its consent to
the settlement if comments received
disclose facts or considerations which
indicate that the settlement is
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.
The agency’s response to any comments
received will be available for public
inspection at the EPA Region 8 Records
Center, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before April 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is
available for public inspection at the
EPA Region 8 Records Center, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202. A copy of the proposed
settlement may be obtained from John
Works, EPA Technical Enforcement
Officer, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, CO 80202, 303.312.6196.
Comments should reference the Terrible
Mine Site, Isle Mining District, Custer
County, Colorado and EPA Docket No.
08–2012–0003 and should be addressed
to John Works, EPA Technical
Enforcement Officer, EPA Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO
80202.
SUMMARY:
John
Works, EPA Technical Enforcement
Officer, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Street, Denver, CO 80202, 303–312–
6196.
Dated: March 21, 2012.
Andrew M. Gaydosh,
Assistant Regional Administrator, Office of
Enforcement and Compliance and
Environmental Justice, U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 8, Denver, CO.
[FR Doc. 2012–7682 Filed 3–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed
by the Federal Communications
Commission
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are
requested concerning (a) whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimate; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before May 29, 2012.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19282-19284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7686]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9650-8]
Draft NPDES General Permit for Discharges From the Oil and Gas
Extraction Point Source Category to Coastal Waters in Texas (TXG330000)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposal of NPDES General Permit Renewal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA Region 6 today proposes a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) general permit regulating discharges from
oil and gas wells in the Coastal Subcategory in Texas and in the
Stripper Subcategory which discharge into coastal waters in Texas.
DATES: Comments must be received by May 14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to: Ms. Diane Smith (6WQ-NP), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733.
Comments may also be submitted via EMAIL to the following address:
smith.diane@epa.gov.
Public Meeting/Public Hearing Information
A public meeting and a public hearing on the proposed permit will
be held at the times and place below. The meeting will include a
presentation on the proposed permit followed by the opportunity for
questions and answers. The public hearing will be held in accordance
with the requirements of 40 CFR 124.12. At the public hearing, any
person may submit oral or written
[[Page 19283]]
statements and data concerning the proposed permit. Any person who
cannot attend the public hearing may still submit written comments,
which have the same weight as comments made at the public hearing,
through the end of the public comment period.
Date: April 11, 2012.
Time: Public meeting starts at 2 p.m. and public hearing starts at
3:30 p.m.
Place: Houston Marriott South Hobby Airport, Galveston Room, 9100
Gulf Freeway, Houston, TX 77017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Diane Smith, Region 6, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733. Telephone: (214) 665-2145.
A complete draft permit and a fact sheet more fully explaining the
proposal may be obtained online from the Web site below or from Ms.
Smith. In addition, the Agency's current administrative record on the
proposal is available for examination at the Region's Dallas offices
during normal working hours after providing Ms. Smith 24 hours advance
notice. A copy of the proposed permit, fact sheet, and this Federal
Register Notice may be found on the EPA Region 6 Web site at: https://www.epa.gov/region6/water/npdes/genpermit/index.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The permit prohibits the discharge of
drilling fluid, drill cuttings, produced sand and well treatment,
completion and workover fluids. Discharges of dewatering effluents from
reserve pits are also proposed to be prohibited. Produced water
discharges are prohibited, except from wells in the Stripper
Subcategory located east of the 98th meridian whose produced water
comes from the Carrizo/Wilcox, Reklaw or Bartosh formations in Texas as
authorized by the expiring permit. The discharge of deck drainage,
formation test fluids, sanitary waste, domestic waste and miscellaneous
discharges is authorized. More stringent requirements are proposed to
regulate discharges to water quality-impaired waterbodies. Pursuant to
the section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA), requirements for new
facilities are also proposed in this permit. Major changes also include
definition of ``operator'', acute toxicity test for produced water,
spill prevention best management practices, and electronic reporting
requirements. Proposed changes and rationales for those changes are
described in the fact sheet. To obtain discharge authorization,
operators of such facilities must submit a new Notice of Intent (NOI).
To determine whether your facility, company, business, organization,
etc. is regulated by this action, you should carefully examine the
applicability criteria in Part I, Section A.1 of this permit. If you
have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Other Legal Requirements
A. State Certification
Under section 401(a)(1) of the CWA, EPA may not issue an NPDES
permit until the State in which the discharge will occur grants or
waives certification to ensure compliance with appropriate requirements
of the CWA and State law. EPA will seek certification from the Railroad
Commission of Texas prior to issuing a final permit.
B. Coastal Zone Management Act
The Coastal Zone Management Act and its implementing regulations
(15 CFR 930) require that any Federally licensed or permitted activity
affecting the coastal zone of a state with an approved Coastal Zone
Management Program be consistent with that Program. EPA has concluded,
based on the conditions, limitations and prohibitions of this permit
that the discharges associated with this permit are consistent with the
Texas Coastal Management Program goals and policies. EPA previously
received a consistency determination from the Texas Coastal
Coordination Council on February 7, 2007. EPA is seeking a consistency
determination prior to issuing this permit reissuance.
C. National Environmental Policy Act
EPA's regulations at 40 CFR part 6, subpart F, which implement the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C., 4331, et
seq., provide the procedures for carrying out the NEPA environmental
review process for the issuance of new source NPDES permits. The
purpose of this review process is to determine if any significant
environmental impacts are anticipated by issuance of NPDES permits
authorizing discharges from new sources. EPA prepared an environmental
assessment (EA) in accordance with 40 CFR 6.604 when the previous
permit was drafted. EPA is working on a supplemental information report
(SIR) and tentatively determines, based on information available, that
there will be no significant impact as the result of reissuing this
permit. EPA will make the final SIR on EPA's Web site https://www.epa.gov/region6/water/npdes/genpermit/index.htm when it becomes
available prior to the reissuance of the final permit.
D. Endangered Species Act
When EPA issued the previous Permit TXG330000, effective October
21, 1993, covering existing sources, but not New Sources, the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) concurred with EPA's finding
that the permit was unlikely to adversely affect any threatened or
endangered species or their critical habitat. When EPA issued Permit
TXG290000, effective February 8, 1995, the Service also concurred with
EPA's finding that the permit was unlikely to adversely affect any
threatened or endangered species or their critical habitat. The Region
found that adding New Source coverage to the permit is also unlikely to
adversely affect any threatened or endangered species or its critical
habitat. EPA received written concurrence from the FWS on May 2, 2001,
and from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) on May 1, 2001,
on that determination. EPA proposes to add more requirements, such as
characterization study for produced water, intake velocity limit for
cooling water intake structures from new facilities, and etc., to the
current permit. EPA has been working on a biological evaluation (BE)
update to evaluate the effects of this permitting action on federally
listed endangered and threatened species.
E. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
The 1996 amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act set forth a new mandate to identify and protect
important marine and anadromous fisheries habitats. The purpose of
addressing habitat in this act is to further the goal of maintaining
sustainable fisheries. Guidance and procedures for implementing these
amendments are contained in National Marine Fisheries Service
regulations (50 CFR 600.805-600.930). These regulations specify that
any Federal agency that authorizes or proposes to authorize an activity
which would adversely affect an Essential Fish Habitat is subject to
the consultation provisions of the Manguson-Stevens Act. The Texas
Coastal Subcategory areas covered by this general permit include
Essential Fish Habitat designated under the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The Region previously found that issuance of the general permit
would be unlikely to adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat. EPA
received written
[[Page 19284]]
concurrence from NMFS on that determination by a letter dated January
10, 2007, when EPA reissued the expiring permit in 2007. Because there
are no changes which make the permit less stringent through this
action, EPA again finds that its issuance is unlikely to adversely
affect Essential Fish Habitat. EPA is seeking concurrence with that
decision from NMFS.
F. Historic Preservation Act
Facilities which adversely affect properties listed or eligible for
listing in the National Register of Historical Places are not
authorized to discharge under this permit.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection required by this permit has been
approved by OMB under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., in submission made for the NPDES permit program
and assigned OMB control numbers 2040-0086 (NPDES permit application)
and 2040-0004 (discharge monitoring reports). Because this permit
authorizes limited discharges, the reporting time for discharges is
less than that for permittees discharging under the Territorial Seas of
Texas (TXG260000) or to Outer Continental Shelf (GMG290000) permits.
Also, this proposed permit requires electronic reporting for discharge
monitoring reports, so it will save some reporting time and paper
mailing costs.
H. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 USC 601 et seq, requires that EPA
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for regulations that have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
permit is not a ``rule'' subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act. EPA
prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis, however, on the
promulgation of the Coastal Subcategory guidelines on which many of the
permit's effluent limitations are based. That analysis shows that
compliance with the permit requirements will not result in a
significant impact on dischargers, including small businesses, covered
by this permit. EPA Region 6, therefore, concludes that the permit
being proposed today will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Dated: March 19, 2012.
William K. Honker,
Acting Director, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012-7686 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P