Privacy Act of 1974; Report of an Altered System of Records, 19295-19299 [2012-7612]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices
issues, including the status of farmworker
health at the local and national levels.
Agenda items are subject to change as
priorities indicate.
For Further Information Contact: Gladys
Cate, Office of Special Population Health,
Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health
Resources and Services Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Room 15–62, Rockville,
Maryland 20857; telephone (301) 594–0367.
Dated: March 22, 2012.
Reva Harris,
Acting Director, Division of Policy and
Information Coordination.
[FR Doc. 2012–7613 Filed 3–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Privacy Act of 1974; Report of an
Altered System of Records
Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS), Health
Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA).
ACTION: Notice of an Altered System of
Records (SOR).
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, the Health
Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA) is publishing a notice to alter
the system of records for the National
Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse
Information on Physicians and Other
Health Care Practitioners, HHS/HRSA/
BHPR. The System of Records Notice
(SORN) 09–15–0054 was last published
on October 1, 2010 (75 FR 60763). The
Health Care Quality Improvement Act of
1986, as amended, title IV of Public Law
99–660 (42 U.S.C. 11101 et seq.)
authorized the Secretary to establish a
National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB)
to collect and release certain
information relating to the professional
competence and conduct of physicians,
dentists, and other health care
practitioners. By law, the information is
releasable only to the specific entities
described in the SORN. The law
requires the maintenance of records
such as medical malpractice payments,
adverse licensure and clinical privilege
actions, disciplinary actions taken by
Boards of Medical Examiners, and
professional review actions taken by
entities against physicians, dentists, and
other healthcare practitioners. Section
1921 of the Social Security Act, as
amended, expands reporting to the
NPDB to authorize maintenance of
records of adverse licensure actions and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
negative actions or findings taken by a
State licensing authority, peer review
organization, or private accreditation
entity against all health care
practitioners or healthcare entities.
The primary purpose of this alteration
is to publish the Privacy Act exemptions
that became necessary after
implementation of Section 1921, which
entitles law enforcement agencies to
access NPDB information and which
therefore requires a similar exemption
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act that the Healthcare Integrity and
Protection Data Bank (HIPDB) has for
investigative materials. Because some of
the records may be queried by law
enforcement agencies for investigative
purposes (i.e., as opposed to
employment or other purposes), the
system will be exempt from certain
Privacy Act requirements to the extent
necessary to avoid revealing law
enforcement investigative interest and
compromising law enforcement
investigations. Another purpose of this
alteration is to add a new routine use
pertaining to system security, which is
being added to other SORNs published
by HHS.
DATES: As required by the Privacy Act
(5 U.S.C. 552a(r)), HRSA filed an altered
system of records report with the Chair
of the House Committee on Oversight
and Government Reform, the Chair of
the Senate Committee on Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs, and
the Administrator, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), on
1/25/12. To ensure all parties have
adequate time in which to comment, the
altered system will become effective 30
days from the publication of this notice
or 40 days from the date it was
submitted to OMB and Congress,
whichever is later, unless HRSA
receives comments that require
alterations to this notice.
ADDRESSES: Please address comments to
Associate Administrator, Bureau of
Health Professions, Health Resources
and Services Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Room 8–103, Rockville,
Maryland 20857. Comments received
will be available for inspection at this
same address from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
(Eastern Standard Time Zone), Monday
through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Division of Practitioner Data
Banks, Bureau of Health Professions,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 8–103,
Rockville, Maryland 20857; Telephone:
(301) 443–2300. This is not a toll-free
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB)
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19295
is primarily an alert or flagging system
intended to facilitate a comprehensive
review of health care practitioners’
professional credentials for the purpose
of protecting the public from unfit
practitioners. On January 28, 2010, the
Health Resources and Services
Administration published a final rule in
the Federal Register (75 FR 4656)
designed to implement section 1921 of
the Social Security Act (herein referred
to as section 1921). Section 1921
expands the scope of the NPDB. Section
1921 requires each state to adopt a
system of reporting to the Secretary
certain adverse licensure actions taken
against health care practitioners and
health care entities by any authority of
the state responsible for the licensing of
such practitioners or entities. It also
requires each state to report any
negative action or finding that a state
licensing authority, a peer review
organization, or a private accreditation
entity has finalized against a health care
practitioner or entity. Practically
speaking, Section 1921 resulted in,
among other consequences, the
inclusion of the vast majority of
information contained in the Healthcare
Integrity and Protection Data Bank
(HIPDB), a companion data bank, in the
NPDB.
The HIPDB was created by the Health
Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996,
Public Law (Pub. L. 104–191), which
required the Secretary of HHS, acting
through the Office of Inspector General
(OIG) and the United States Attorney
General, to establish a new health care
fraud and abuse control program to
combat health care fraud and abuse.
Although their purposes are different,
together the HIPDB and NPDB serve to
facilitate review of health care
practitioners’ and entities’ backgrounds.
The HIPDB is exempt from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act (see 45
CFR 5b.11(b)(2)(ii)(F)). In order to
maintain the exemption for the HIPDB
investigative materials, which are now
also available through the NPDB, and
other expanded information which law
enforcement agencies can access, it was
necessary to extend similar Privacy Act
exemptions for the HIPDB to the NPDB.
The new routine use that is being added
for this system pertains to system
security. It is not specific to the NPDB
system; it is being added to new,
existing, and updated SORNs published
by HHS for other systems that are
affected by the same security
requirement.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
19296
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices
Dated: March 21, 2012.
Mary K. Wakefield,
Administrator.
SYSTEM NUMBER:
09–15–0054.
SYSTEM NAME:
National Practitioner Data Bank for
Adverse Information on Physicians and
Other Health Care Practitioners, HHS/
HRSA/BHPR.
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
None.
SYSTEM LOCATION:
A contractor, SRA International, Inc.,
operates and maintains an Internetbased system through a technical
service contract for the Division of
Practitioner Data Banks, Bureau of
Health Professions, Health Resources
and Services Administration. SRA’s
physical address is 4350 Fair Lakes
Courts, Fairfax, Virginia 22033–4233.
This system is located at the AT&T Data
Center, a secure facility; the street
address will not be disclosed for
security reasons.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
The system collects and maintains
records pertaining to the professional
competence and conduct of individual
health care practitioners (doctors,
dentists, nurses, allied health care
professionals, social workers, etc.) and
health care entities (hospitals,
laboratories, pharmacies, etc.).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
The system collects and maintains
reports and query history records.
Reports include: (1) Medical
malpractice payment reports for all
health care practitioners, i.e.,
physicians, dentists, nurses,
optometrists, pharmacists, and
podiatrists, etc.; (2) adverse clinical
privilege action reports for physicians,
dentists, and other healthcare
practitioners who may have medical
staff privileges either restricted or
surrendered; (3) adverse licensure
action reports for physicians, dentists
and other healthcare practitioners and
healthcare entities such as a suspension
or revocation; (4) adverse professional
society membership action reports for
physicians, dentists, and other health
care practitioners; (5) reports of the
results of formal proceedings by a State
licensing authority, peer review
organization, or private accreditation
organization concluded against a health
care practitioner or entity; (6) reports of
Medicare/Medicaid exclusions of all
healthcare practitioners; and (7) reports
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
of adverse actions taken against the U.S.
Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) registration of all healthcare
practitioners.
Reports may contain the following
personally-identifiable data elements:
1. Name;
2. Work address;
3. Home address;
4. Social Security number;
5. Date of birth;
6. Name of each professional school
attended and year of graduation;
7. Professional license(s) number;
8. Field of licensure;
9. Name of the State or Territory in
which the license is held;
10. DEA registration numbers;
11. CMS unique practitioner
identification number (for exclusions
only);
12. Names of each hospital with
which the practitioner is affiliated;
13. Name and address of the entity
making the payment;
14. Name, title, and telephone number
of the official responsible for submitting
the report on behalf of the entity;
15. Payment information including
the date and amount of payment and
whether it is for a judgment or
settlement;
16. Date action occurred;
17. Acts or omissions upon which the
action or claim was based;
18. Description of the action/
omissions and injuries or illnesses upon
which the action or claim was based;
19. Description of the Board action,
the date of action and its effective date;
and
20. Classification of the action/
omission per reporting code.
Query histories indicate the dates that
an individual health care practitioner’s
report(s) were accessed/queried in the
system and by whom. Each
practitioner’s report(s) and query history
are available to him or her, if the
practitioner elects to submit a selfquery. However, the query history will
not include query activity by law
enforcement agencies, if any, due to the
system’s exemption.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
The Health Care Quality Improvement
Act of 1986, as amended, title IV of
Public Law 99–660 [42 U.S.C. 11101 et
seq.], and Section 1921 of the Social
Security Act, as amended.
PURPOSE(S):
The purpose of the system is to:
(1) Receive information such as adverse
licensure actions on all healthcare
practitioners or entities, clinical
privileges and professional society
membership actions on physicians and
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
dentists based on professional
competence and conduct, medical
malpractice payment history on all
health care practitioners, as well as the
results of formal proceedings by a State
authority, peer review organization or
private accreditation organization
concluded against any health care
practitioner or entity; (2) store such
reports so that future queriers may have
access to pertinent information
regarding the review of a health care
practitioner and/or a healthcare entity
in their process of making important
decisions related to the delivery of
health care services; and (3) disseminate
such data to entities that qualify to
receive the reports under the governing
statutes as authorized by the Health
Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986
and Section 1921 of the Social Security
Act to protect the public from unfit
practitioners and prevent unfit
practitioners from providing patient
care.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
Information from this system shall be
disclosed to:
1. Hospitals requesting information,
such as, adverse licensure actions,
medical malpractice payments or
exclusions from Medicare and Medicaid
programs taken against all licensed
healthcare practitioners such as
physicians, dentists, nurses, podiatrists,
chiropractors, and psychologists. The
information is accessible to both public
and private sector hospitals who can
request information concerning a
physician, dentist or other health care
practitioner who is on its medical staff
(courtesy or otherwise) or who has
clinical privileges at the hospital, for the
purpose of: (a) Screening the
professional qualifications of
individuals who apply for staff
positions or clinical privileges at the
hospital; and (b) meeting the
requirements of the Health Care Quality
Improvement Act of 1986, which
prescribes that a hospital must query the
NPDB once every 2 years regarding all
individuals on its medical staff or who
hold clinical privileges.
2. Other health care entities, as
defined in 45 CFR 60.3, to which a
physician, dentist or other health care
practitioner has applied for clinical
privileges or appointment to the
medical staff or who has entered or may
be entering an employment or affiliation
relationship. The purpose of these
disclosures is to identify individuals
whose professional conduct may be
unsatisfactory.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices
3. A health care entity with respect to
professional review activity. The
purpose of these disclosures is to aid
health care entities in the conduct of
professional review activities, such as
those involving determinations of
whether a physician, dentist, or other
health care practitioner may be granted
membership in a professional society;
the conditions of such membership, or
of changes to such membership; and
ongoing professional review activities
conducted by a health care entity which
provides health care services, of the
professional performance or conduct of
a physician, dentist, or other health care
practitioner.
4. A State healthcare practitioner and/
or entity licensing or certification
authority can request information
expanded by Section 1921 of the Social
Security Act in conducting a review of
all healthcare practitioners or health
entities. A State healthcare practitioner
and entity licensing or certification
authority may also request information
when making licensure determinations
about healthcare practitioners and
entities. The purpose of these
disclosures is to aid the board or
certification authority in meeting its
responsibility to protect the health of
the population in its jurisdiction, by
identifying individuals whose
professional performance or conduct
may be unsatisfactory.
5. Federal and State health care
programs (and their contractors) can
request information reported under
Section 1921 of the Social Security Act.
The purpose of these disclosures is to
aid Federal and State health programs to
ensure the integrity and professional
competence of affiliated health care
practitioners and uncovering
information needed to make appropriate
decisions in the delivery of healthcare.
6. State Medicaid Fraud Control Units
(MFCUs) can request information
reported under Section 1921 of the
Social Security Act to assist with
investigating fraud and prosecution of
healthcare practitioners and providers
in the administration of the Medicaid
programs.
7. U.S. Comptroller General can
request information reported under
Section 1921 of the Social Security Act
to assist in determining the fitness of
individuals to provide healthcare
services, and protect the health and
safety of individuals receiving health
care through programs who employ
these individuals.
8. U.S. Attorney General and other
law enforcement agencies can request
information reported under Section
1921 of the Social Security Act to assist
with healthcare investigations involving
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
healthcare practitioners and healthcare
entities. The purpose of the disclosure
would assist in determining the fitness
of individuals to provide healthcare
services, and protect the health and
safety of individuals receiving health
care through programs who employ
these individuals.
9. Utilization and quality control Peer
Review Organizations and those entities
which are under contract with the CMS
can request information reported under
Section 1921 of the Social Security Act
to protect and improve the quality of
care for Medicare beneficiaries when
performing quality of care reviews and
other related activities.
10. A physician, dentist, or other
health care practitioner can request
information concerning himself or
herself.
11. An entity that has been reported
on may query the system to receive
information concerning itself.
12. A person or entity can request
statistical information, in a form which
does not permit the identification of any
individual or entity pursuant to the
procedures established by the
Department. An example of this
disclosure involves researchers who
may use statistical information to
identify the total number of nurses with
adverse licensure actions in a specific
State.
13. An attorney, or individual
representing himself or herself, who has
filed a medical malpractice action or
claim in a State or Federal court or other
adjudicative body against a hospital,
and who requests information regarding
a specific physician, dentist, or other
health care practitioner who is also
named in the action or claim provided
that: (a) This information will be
disclosed only upon the submission of
evidence that the hospital failed to
request information from the NPDB as
required by law; and (b) the information
will be used solely with respect to
litigation resulting from the action or
claim against the hospital. The purpose
of these disclosures is to permit an
attorney (or a person representing
himself or herself in a medical
malpractice action) to have information
from the NPDB on a health care
practitioner, under the conditions set
out in this routine use.
14. Any Federal entity, employing or
otherwise engaging under arrangement
(e.g., such as a contract) the services of
a physician, dentist, or other health care
practitioner, or having the authority to
sanction such practitioners covered by a
Federal program, which: (a) Enters into
a memorandum of understanding with
HHS regarding its participation in the
NPDB; (b) engages in a professional
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19297
review activity in determining an
adverse action against a practitioner;
and (c) maintains a Privacy Act system
of records regarding the health care
practitioners it employs, or whose
services it engages under arrangement.
The purpose of such disclosures is to
enable hospitals and other facilities and
health care providers under the
jurisdiction of Federal agencies such as
the Public Health Service, HHS; the
Department of Defense; the Department
of Veterans’ Affairs; the U.S. Coast
Guard; and the Bureau of Prisons,
Department of Justice, to participate in
the NPDB. The Health Care Quality
Improvement Act of 1986 includes
provisions regarding the participation of
such agencies and of the DEA.
15. In the event of litigation where the
defendant is: (a) The Department, any
component of the Department, or any
employee of the Department in his or
her official capacity; (b) the United
States where the Department determines
that the claim, if successful, is likely to
affect directly the operation of the
Department or any of its components; or
(c) any Department employee in his or
her individual capacity where the
Department of Justice has agreed to
represent such employee, for example in
defending a claim against the Public
Health Service based upon an
individual’s mental or physical
condition and alleged to have arisen
because of activities of the Public Health
Service in connection with such
individual, disclosures may be made to
the Department of Justice to enable the
Department to present an effective
defense, provided that such disclosure
is compatible with the purpose for
which the records were collected.
16. The contractor, SRA International
Inc., accesses the system to operate and
maintain it. These functions include but
are not limited to providing continuous
user availability, develop system
enhancements, upgrade of hardware and
software, security information
assurance, and system backups.
17. To appropriate federal agencies
and Department contractors that have a
need to know the information for the
purpose of assisting the Department’s
efforts to respond to a suspected or
confirmed breach of the security or
confidentiality of information
maintained in this system of records,
and the information disclosed is
relevant and necessary for that
assistance.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
19298
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices
the year to verify compliance with all
required controls.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF RECORDS:
STORAGE:
Records are maintained on database
servers with disk storage, optical
jukebox storage, backup tapes and
printed reports.
RETRIEVABILITY:
Records are retrieved by name, date of
birth, social security number,
educational information, and license
number. The matching algorithm uses
these data elements to match reports to
the subject.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SAFEGUARDS FOR ACCESSING RECORDS:
1. Authorized Users include internal
users such as the government and
contractor personnel staff who support
the NPDB and are required to obtain
favorable adjudication for a Level 5
Position of Public Trust. New
employees of the NPDB and the
contractor must attend security training,
sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement, and
sign the Rules of Behavior which is
renewed annually. Authorized users are
given role-based access to the system on
a limited need-to-know basis. All
physical and logical access to the
system is removed upon termination of
employment. External users, who are
responsible for meeting Title IV
reporting and/or querying requirements
to the NPDB, are responsible for
determining their eligibility to access
the NPDB through a self-certification
process which requires completing an
Entity Registration form. All external
users must acknowledge the Rules of
Behavior. All external users must reregister every two years to access the
NPDB. Both HRSA and the contractor
maintain lists of authorized users.
2. Physical Safeguards involve
physical controls that are in place 24
hours a day/7 days a week such as
identification badge access, cipher
locks, locked hardware cages, man trap
with biometric hand scanner, security
guard monitoring, and closed circuit
TV. All sites are protected with fire and
environmental safety controls.
3. Technical Safeguards include
firewalls, network intrusion detection,
host-based intrusion detection and file
integrity monitoring, user identification,
and passwords restrictions. All Webbased traffic is encrypted using 128 bit
SSL and all network traffic is encrypted
internally.
4. Administrative Safeguards involve
certification and accreditation that is
required every three years, which
authorizes operation of the system based
on acceptable risk. Security assessments
are conducted continuously throughout
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
HRSA is working with NARA to
obtain the appropriate retention value.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
Director, Division of Practitioner Data
Banks, Bureau of Health Professions,
Health Resources and Services
Administration, Room 8–103, Parklawn
Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville,
Maryland 20857.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
Subject to the exemption from the
Privacy Act notification procedure
requirement, information is available
upon request, to the persons or entities,
or to the authorized agents in such form
or manner as the Secretary prescribes.
Currently, the subject of a report is
notified via U.S. mail when a report
concerning the individual is submitted
to the NPDB via Subject Notification
Document (SND). This procedure is
unchanged by the exemption.
REQUESTS BY MAIL:
Practitioners may submit a ‘‘Request
for Information Disclosure’’ to the
address under system location for any
report on themselves. The request must
contain the following: Name, address,
date of birth, gender, Social Security
Number (optional), professional schools
and years of graduation, and the
professional license(s). For license,
include: The license number, the field
of licensure, the name of the State or
Territory in which the license is held,
and DEA registration number(s). The
practitioner must submit a signed and
notarized self-query request.
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION:
Submitting a request under false
pretenses is a criminal offense and
subject to a civil monetary penalty of up
to $11,000 for each violation.
REQUESTS IN PERSON:
Due to security considerations, the
NPDB cannot accept requests in person.
REQUESTS BY TELEPHONE:
Practitioners may provide all of the
identifying information stated above to
the NPDB Customer Service Center
operator. Before the data request is
fulfilled, the operator will return a
paper copy of this information for
verification, signature and notarization.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Although this system will be exempt
from the Privacy Act access
requirement, the exemption will be
limited and discretionary. An
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
individual health care practitioner may
continue to seek access to his or her
records in the NPDB by submitting a
self-query request form on-line at:
www.npdb-hipdb.hrsa.gov. The requests
are submitted over the web using the
Integrated Query and Reporting Service
(IQRS), Query and Reporting Extensible
Markup Language Service (QRXS),
Interface Control Document (ICD)
Transfer Program (ITP) or the Proactive
Disclosure Service (PDS). Self-query, as
described previously, may be initiated
via the electronic system and is
completed using the conventional mail
system. Requesters, including selfqueries, will receive an accounting of
disclosure that has been made of their
records, if any. The exemption will
prevent law enforcement query activity
from being disclosed to the health care
practitioner in response to a self-query.
Notwithstanding the access
exemption, a practitioner may request
access to his or her full query history
(i.e., including law enforcement query
activity, if any), by submitting a written
request to the System Manager
identified above and following the same
procedures indicated under
‘‘Notification Procedure.’’ The request
will be processed pursuant to the
agency’s discretionary access authority
under 45 CFR 5b.11(d).
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
Because of the system’s exemption,
the procedures for disputing a NPDB
report will not apply to any query
history information that is exempt from
access. The NPDB routinely mails a
copy of any report filed in it to the
subject individual. A subject individual
may contest the accuracy of information
in the NPDB concerning himself or
herself and file a dispute. To dispute the
accuracy of the information, the
individual must contact the NPDB and
the reporting entity to: (1) Request for
the reporting entity to file correction to
the report; and (2) request the
information be entered into a
‘‘disputed’’ status and submit a
statement regarding the basis for the
inaccuracy of the information in the
report. If the reporting entity declines to
change the disputed report or takes no
actions, the subject may request that the
Secretary of HHS review the disputed
report. In order to seek a Secretarial
Review, the subject must: (1) Provide
written documentation containing clear
and brief factual information regarding
the information of the report; (2) submit
supporting documentation or
justification substantiating that the
reporting entity’s information is
inaccurate; and (3) submit proof that the
subject individual has attempted to
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices
resolve the disagreement with reporting
entity but was unsuccessful. The
Department can only determine whether
the report was legally required to be
filed and whether the report accurately
depicts the action taken and the
reporter’s basis for action. Additional
detail on the process of dispute
resolution and Secretarial Review
process can be found at 45 CFR 60.14
of the NPDB regulations.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
The records contained in the system
are submitted by the following entities:
(1) Insurance companies and others who
have made payment as a result of a
malpractice action or claim, (2) State
Boards of Medical and Dental
Examiners; (3) State Licensing Boards;
(4) hospitals and other health care
entities; (5) DEA; and (6) Federal
entities which employ health
practitioners or who have authority to
sanction such practitioners covered by a
Federal program. Section 1921 of the
Social Security Act expands reporting of
actions submitted by State health care
practitioner licensing and certification
authorities (including medical and
dental boards), State entity licensing
and certification authorities, peer
review organizations and private
accreditation organizations.
SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS
OF THE ACT:
The Secretary has exempted this
system from certain provisions of the
Act. In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(k)(2) and 45 CFR 5b.11(b)(ii)(L), this
system is exempt from subsections 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1)–(4), (e)(4)(G)
and (H), and (f).
[FR Doc. 2012–7612 Filed 3–29–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Government-Owned Inventions;
Availability for Licensing
National Institutes of Health,
Public Health Service, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The inventions listed below
are owned by an agency of the U.S.
Government and are available for
licensing in the U.S. in accordance with
35 U.S.C. 207 to achieve expeditious
commercialization of results of
federally-funded research and
development. Foreign patent
applications are filed on selected
inventions to extend market coverage
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Mar 29, 2012
Jkt 226001
for companies and may also be available
for licensing.
ADDRESSES: Licensing information and
copies of the U.S. patent applications
listed below may be obtained by writing
to the indicated licensing contact at the
Office of Technology Transfer, National
Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive
Boulevard, Suite 325, Rockville,
Maryland 20852–3804; telephone: 301–
496–7057; fax: 301–402–0220. A signed
Confidential Disclosure Agreement will
be required to receive copies of the
patent applications.
MUC–1 Tumor Antigen Agonist
Epitopes for Enhancing T-cell
Responses to Human Tumors
Description of Technology: The MUC–
1 tumor associated antigen has been
shown to be overexpressed and/or
underglycosylated in a wide range of
human cancers. The C-terminus region
of MUC–1 (MUC–1C) has been shown to
be an oncogene and has been associated
with a more aggressive phenotype in
several different cancers.
Scientists at NIH have identified 7
new agonist epitopes of the MUC–1
tumor associated antigen. Compared to
their native epitope counterparts,
peptides reflecting these agonist
epitopes have been shown to enhance
the generation of human tumor cells,
which in turn have a greater ability to
kill human tumor cells endogenously
expressing the native MUC–1 epitope.
The agonist epitopes span both the
VNTR region of MUC–1 and the Cterminus region. The epitopes
encompass 2 major MHC alleles
reflecting the majority of the population.
Along with the method of use, the
technology encompasses the use of
these agonist epitopes in peptide- and
protein-based vaccines, with dendritic
cells or other antigen presenting cells, or
encoding sequences in DNA, viral,
bacterial, yeast, or other types of
vectors, or to stimulate T-cells in vitro
for adoptive immunotherapy protocols.
Potential Commercial Applications:
• As a therapeutic vaccine to enhance
patient’s immune responses to a range
of human cancers
• As a preventive vaccine for patients
with preneoplastic conditions or a high
risk of developing cancer
• As a preventive vaccine for cancers
• For in vitro stimulation of
lymphocytes for adoptive transfer
protocols for cancer
Competitive Advantages:
• The agonist epitopes have been
shown to be much more potent than
their natural counterparts in activating
human T-cells to MUC–1.
• Compared to T-cells activated with
the corresponding native epitopes, the
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19299
T-cells activated by the agonist epitopes
lyse tumor cells to a greater extent.
• The technology can be used in a
wide range of cancer vaccine platforms
and in adoptive immunotherapy
protocols.
• The technology can be combined
with existing vaccine platforms
including those currently showing
patient benefit, as well as with other
therapeutic modalities.
Development Stage:
• Pre-clinical
• In vitro data available
Inventors: Jeffrey Schlom and KwongYok Tsang (NCI).
Intellectual Property: HHS Reference
No. E–001–2012/0—U.S. Patent
Application No. 61/582,723 filed 03 Jan
2012.
Related Technologies:
• HHS Reference No. E–154–1998/0
—PCT Application No. PCT/US98/
03693
• HHS Reference No. E–321–2003/0
—PCT Application No. PCT/US2004/
41921
Licensing Contact: Sabarni Chatterjee,
Ph.D., MBA; 301–435–5587;
chatterjeesa@mail.nih.gov.
Collaborative Research Opportunity:
The Laboratory of Tumor Immunology
and Biology, National Cancer Institute,
is seeking statements of capability or
interest from parties interested in
collaborative research to further
develop, evaluate or commercialize the
use of MUC–1 tumor antigen agonist
epitopes for the treatment or prevention
of cancer. For collaboration
opportunities, please contact John
Hewes, Ph.D. at hewesj@mail.nih.gov.
Novel Diagnostic, Prognostic and
Therapeutic Biomarker for
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Description of Technology: Scientists
at the National Cancer Institute have
discovered that Stearol-CoA desaturase1 (SCD–1) is associated with
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Utilizing a microarray to analyze HCC
patient samples, the investigators found
SCD–1 is elevated in liver tumor tissues
and it is a marker for a highly aggressive
form of HCC, hepatic stem cell-like HCC
subtype (HpSC HCC), which retains
stem-cell features capable of cellular
plasticity and cell motility. The
investigators found SCD–1 is
significantly elevated in HpSC tumors
in comparison to less aggressive HCC
tumors and it is associated with poor
patient survival. In vitro studies
demonstrate SCD–1 inhibition and/or
addition of saturated palmitic acid
reduces HpSC HCC characteristics. In
addition to diagnostic, prognostic, and
treatment applications, this technology
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19295-19299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7612]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration
Privacy Act of 1974; Report of an Altered System of Records
AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Health Resources
and Services Administration (HRSA).
ACTION: Notice of an Altered System of Records (SOR).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, the Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA) is publishing a notice to alter the system of
records for the National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information
on Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners, HHS/HRSA/BHPR. The
System of Records Notice (SORN) 09-15-0054 was last published on
October 1, 2010 (75 FR 60763). The Health Care Quality Improvement Act
of 1986, as amended, title IV of Public Law 99-660 (42 U.S.C. 11101 et
seq.) authorized the Secretary to establish a National Practitioner
Data Bank (NPDB) to collect and release certain information relating to
the professional competence and conduct of physicians, dentists, and
other health care practitioners. By law, the information is releasable
only to the specific entities described in the SORN. The law requires
the maintenance of records such as medical malpractice payments,
adverse licensure and clinical privilege actions, disciplinary actions
taken by Boards of Medical Examiners, and professional review actions
taken by entities against physicians, dentists, and other healthcare
practitioners. Section 1921 of the Social Security Act, as amended,
expands reporting to the NPDB to authorize maintenance of records of
adverse licensure actions and negative actions or findings taken by a
State licensing authority, peer review organization, or private
accreditation entity against all health care practitioners or
healthcare entities.
The primary purpose of this alteration is to publish the Privacy
Act exemptions that became necessary after implementation of Section
1921, which entitles law enforcement agencies to access NPDB
information and which therefore requires a similar exemption from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act that the Healthcare Integrity and
Protection Data Bank (HIPDB) has for investigative materials. Because
some of the records may be queried by law enforcement agencies for
investigative purposes (i.e., as opposed to employment or other
purposes), the system will be exempt from certain Privacy Act
requirements to the extent necessary to avoid revealing law enforcement
investigative interest and compromising law enforcement investigations.
Another purpose of this alteration is to add a new routine use
pertaining to system security, which is being added to other SORNs
published by HHS.
DATES: As required by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(r)), HRSA filed an
altered system of records report with the Chair of the House Committee
on Oversight and Government Reform, the Chair of the Senate Committee
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Administrator,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), on 1/25/12. To ensure all parties have adequate time in
which to comment, the altered system will become effective 30 days from
the publication of this notice or 40 days from the date it was
submitted to OMB and Congress, whichever is later, unless HRSA receives
comments that require alterations to this notice.
ADDRESSES: Please address comments to Associate Administrator, Bureau
of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 8-103, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Comments
received will be available for inspection at this same address from 9
a.m. to 3 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time Zone), Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Division of Practitioner
Data Banks, Bureau of Health Professions, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 8-
103, Rockville, Maryland 20857; Telephone: (301) 443-2300. This is not
a toll-free number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB)
is primarily an alert or flagging system intended to facilitate a
comprehensive review of health care practitioners' professional
credentials for the purpose of protecting the public from unfit
practitioners. On January 28, 2010, the Health Resources and Services
Administration published a final rule in the Federal Register (75 FR
4656) designed to implement section 1921 of the Social Security Act
(herein referred to as section 1921). Section 1921 expands the scope of
the NPDB. Section 1921 requires each state to adopt a system of
reporting to the Secretary certain adverse licensure actions taken
against health care practitioners and health care entities by any
authority of the state responsible for the licensing of such
practitioners or entities. It also requires each state to report any
negative action or finding that a state licensing authority, a peer
review organization, or a private accreditation entity has finalized
against a health care practitioner or entity. Practically speaking,
Section 1921 resulted in, among other consequences, the inclusion of
the vast majority of information contained in the Healthcare Integrity
and Protection Data Bank (HIPDB), a companion data bank, in the NPDB.
The HIPDB was created by the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, Public Law (Pub. L. 104-191), which
required the Secretary of HHS, acting through the Office of Inspector
General (OIG) and the United States Attorney General, to establish a
new health care fraud and abuse control program to combat health care
fraud and abuse. Although their purposes are different, together the
HIPDB and NPDB serve to facilitate review of health care practitioners'
and entities' backgrounds. The HIPDB is exempt from certain provisions
of the Privacy Act (see 45 CFR 5b.11(b)(2)(ii)(F)). In order to
maintain the exemption for the HIPDB investigative materials, which are
now also available through the NPDB, and other expanded information
which law enforcement agencies can access, it was necessary to extend
similar Privacy Act exemptions for the HIPDB to the NPDB. The new
routine use that is being added for this system pertains to system
security. It is not specific to the NPDB system; it is being added to
new, existing, and updated SORNs published by HHS for other systems
that are affected by the same security requirement.
[[Page 19296]]
Dated: March 21, 2012.
Mary K. Wakefield,
Administrator.
SYSTEM NUMBER:
09-15-0054.
SYSTEM NAME:
National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information on
Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners, HHS/HRSA/BHPR.
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:
None.
SYSTEM LOCATION:
A contractor, SRA International, Inc., operates and maintains an
Internet-based system through a technical service contract for the
Division of Practitioner Data Banks, Bureau of Health Professions,
Health Resources and Services Administration. SRA's physical address is
4350 Fair Lakes Courts, Fairfax, Virginia 22033-4233. This system is
located at the AT&T Data Center, a secure facility; the street address
will not be disclosed for security reasons.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE SYSTEM:
The system collects and maintains records pertaining to the
professional competence and conduct of individual health care
practitioners (doctors, dentists, nurses, allied health care
professionals, social workers, etc.) and health care entities
(hospitals, laboratories, pharmacies, etc.).
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
The system collects and maintains reports and query history
records. Reports include: (1) Medical malpractice payment reports for
all health care practitioners, i.e., physicians, dentists, nurses,
optometrists, pharmacists, and podiatrists, etc.; (2) adverse clinical
privilege action reports for physicians, dentists, and other healthcare
practitioners who may have medical staff privileges either restricted
or surrendered; (3) adverse licensure action reports for physicians,
dentists and other healthcare practitioners and healthcare entities
such as a suspension or revocation; (4) adverse professional society
membership action reports for physicians, dentists, and other health
care practitioners; (5) reports of the results of formal proceedings by
a State licensing authority, peer review organization, or private
accreditation organization concluded against a health care practitioner
or entity; (6) reports of Medicare/Medicaid exclusions of all
healthcare practitioners; and (7) reports of adverse actions taken
against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) registration of
all healthcare practitioners.
Reports may contain the following personally-identifiable data
elements:
1. Name;
2. Work address;
3. Home address;
4. Social Security number;
5. Date of birth;
6. Name of each professional school attended and year of
graduation;
7. Professional license(s) number;
8. Field of licensure;
9. Name of the State or Territory in which the license is held;
10. DEA registration numbers;
11. CMS unique practitioner identification number (for exclusions
only);
12. Names of each hospital with which the practitioner is
affiliated;
13. Name and address of the entity making the payment;
14. Name, title, and telephone number of the official responsible
for submitting the report on behalf of the entity;
15. Payment information including the date and amount of payment
and whether it is for a judgment or settlement;
16. Date action occurred;
17. Acts or omissions upon which the action or claim was based;
18. Description of the action/omissions and injuries or illnesses
upon which the action or claim was based;
19. Description of the Board action, the date of action and its
effective date; and
20. Classification of the action/omission per reporting code.
Query histories indicate the dates that an individual health care
practitioner's report(s) were accessed/queried in the system and by
whom. Each practitioner's report(s) and query history are available to
him or her, if the practitioner elects to submit a self-query. However,
the query history will not include query activity by law enforcement
agencies, if any, due to the system's exemption.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, as amended, title
IV of Public Law 99-660 [42 U.S.C. 11101 et seq.], and Section 1921 of
the Social Security Act, as amended.
PURPOSE(S):
The purpose of the system is to: (1) Receive information such as
adverse licensure actions on all healthcare practitioners or entities,
clinical privileges and professional society membership actions on
physicians and dentists based on professional competence and conduct,
medical malpractice payment history on all health care practitioners,
as well as the results of formal proceedings by a State authority, peer
review organization or private accreditation organization concluded
against any health care practitioner or entity; (2) store such reports
so that future queriers may have access to pertinent information
regarding the review of a health care practitioner and/or a healthcare
entity in their process of making important decisions related to the
delivery of health care services; and (3) disseminate such data to
entities that qualify to receive the reports under the governing
statutes as authorized by the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of
1986 and Section 1921 of the Social Security Act to protect the public
from unfit practitioners and prevent unfit practitioners from providing
patient care.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES
OF USERS AND THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
Information from this system shall be disclosed to:
1. Hospitals requesting information, such as, adverse licensure
actions, medical malpractice payments or exclusions from Medicare and
Medicaid programs taken against all licensed healthcare practitioners
such as physicians, dentists, nurses, podiatrists, chiropractors, and
psychologists. The information is accessible to both public and private
sector hospitals who can request information concerning a physician,
dentist or other health care practitioner who is on its medical staff
(courtesy or otherwise) or who has clinical privileges at the hospital,
for the purpose of: (a) Screening the professional qualifications of
individuals who apply for staff positions or clinical privileges at the
hospital; and (b) meeting the requirements of the Health Care Quality
Improvement Act of 1986, which prescribes that a hospital must query
the NPDB once every 2 years regarding all individuals on its medical
staff or who hold clinical privileges.
2. Other health care entities, as defined in 45 CFR 60.3, to which
a physician, dentist or other health care practitioner has applied for
clinical privileges or appointment to the medical staff or who has
entered or may be entering an employment or affiliation relationship.
The purpose of these disclosures is to identify individuals whose
professional conduct may be unsatisfactory.
[[Page 19297]]
3. A health care entity with respect to professional review
activity. The purpose of these disclosures is to aid health care
entities in the conduct of professional review activities, such as
those involving determinations of whether a physician, dentist, or
other health care practitioner may be granted membership in a
professional society; the conditions of such membership, or of changes
to such membership; and ongoing professional review activities
conducted by a health care entity which provides health care services,
of the professional performance or conduct of a physician, dentist, or
other health care practitioner.
4. A State healthcare practitioner and/or entity licensing or
certification authority can request information expanded by Section
1921 of the Social Security Act in conducting a review of all
healthcare practitioners or health entities. A State healthcare
practitioner and entity licensing or certification authority may also
request information when making licensure determinations about
healthcare practitioners and entities. The purpose of these disclosures
is to aid the board or certification authority in meeting its
responsibility to protect the health of the population in its
jurisdiction, by identifying individuals whose professional performance
or conduct may be unsatisfactory.
5. Federal and State health care programs (and their contractors)
can request information reported under Section 1921 of the Social
Security Act. The purpose of these disclosures is to aid Federal and
State health programs to ensure the integrity and professional
competence of affiliated health care practitioners and uncovering
information needed to make appropriate decisions in the delivery of
healthcare.
6. State Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) can request
information reported under Section 1921 of the Social Security Act to
assist with investigating fraud and prosecution of healthcare
practitioners and providers in the administration of the Medicaid
programs.
7. U.S. Comptroller General can request information reported under
Section 1921 of the Social Security Act to assist in determining the
fitness of individuals to provide healthcare services, and protect the
health and safety of individuals receiving health care through programs
who employ these individuals.
8. U.S. Attorney General and other law enforcement agencies can
request information reported under Section 1921 of the Social Security
Act to assist with healthcare investigations involving healthcare
practitioners and healthcare entities. The purpose of the disclosure
would assist in determining the fitness of individuals to provide
healthcare services, and protect the health and safety of individuals
receiving health care through programs who employ these individuals.
9. Utilization and quality control Peer Review Organizations and
those entities which are under contract with the CMS can request
information reported under Section 1921 of the Social Security Act to
protect and improve the quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries when
performing quality of care reviews and other related activities.
10. A physician, dentist, or other health care practitioner can
request information concerning himself or herself.
11. An entity that has been reported on may query the system to
receive information concerning itself.
12. A person or entity can request statistical information, in a
form which does not permit the identification of any individual or
entity pursuant to the procedures established by the Department. An
example of this disclosure involves researchers who may use statistical
information to identify the total number of nurses with adverse
licensure actions in a specific State.
13. An attorney, or individual representing himself or herself, who
has filed a medical malpractice action or claim in a State or Federal
court or other adjudicative body against a hospital, and who requests
information regarding a specific physician, dentist, or other health
care practitioner who is also named in the action or claim provided
that: (a) This information will be disclosed only upon the submission
of evidence that the hospital failed to request information from the
NPDB as required by law; and (b) the information will be used solely
with respect to litigation resulting from the action or claim against
the hospital. The purpose of these disclosures is to permit an attorney
(or a person representing himself or herself in a medical malpractice
action) to have information from the NPDB on a health care
practitioner, under the conditions set out in this routine use.
14. Any Federal entity, employing or otherwise engaging under
arrangement (e.g., such as a contract) the services of a physician,
dentist, or other health care practitioner, or having the authority to
sanction such practitioners covered by a Federal program, which: (a)
Enters into a memorandum of understanding with HHS regarding its
participation in the NPDB; (b) engages in a professional review
activity in determining an adverse action against a practitioner; and
(c) maintains a Privacy Act system of records regarding the health care
practitioners it employs, or whose services it engages under
arrangement. The purpose of such disclosures is to enable hospitals and
other facilities and health care providers under the jurisdiction of
Federal agencies such as the Public Health Service, HHS; the Department
of Defense; the Department of Veterans' Affairs; the U.S. Coast Guard;
and the Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, to participate in the
NPDB. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 includes
provisions regarding the participation of such agencies and of the DEA.
15. In the event of litigation where the defendant is: (a) The
Department, any component of the Department, or any employee of the
Department in his or her official capacity; (b) the United States where
the Department determines that the claim, if successful, is likely to
affect directly the operation of the Department or any of its
components; or (c) any Department employee in his or her individual
capacity where the Department of Justice has agreed to represent such
employee, for example in defending a claim against the Public Health
Service based upon an individual's mental or physical condition and
alleged to have arisen because of activities of the Public Health
Service in connection with such individual, disclosures may be made to
the Department of Justice to enable the Department to present an
effective defense, provided that such disclosure is compatible with the
purpose for which the records were collected.
16. The contractor, SRA International Inc., accesses the system to
operate and maintain it. These functions include but are not limited to
providing continuous user availability, develop system enhancements,
upgrade of hardware and software, security information assurance, and
system backups.
17. To appropriate federal agencies and Department contractors that
have a need to know the information for the purpose of assisting the
Department's efforts to respond to a suspected or confirmed breach of
the security or confidentiality of information maintained in this
system of records, and the information disclosed is relevant and
necessary for that assistance.
[[Page 19298]]
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING,
AND DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
STORAGE:
Records are maintained on database servers with disk storage,
optical jukebox storage, backup tapes and printed reports.
RETRIEVABILITY:
Records are retrieved by name, date of birth, social security
number, educational information, and license number. The matching
algorithm uses these data elements to match reports to the subject.
SAFEGUARDS FOR ACCESSING RECORDS:
1. Authorized Users include internal users such as the government
and contractor personnel staff who support the NPDB and are required to
obtain favorable adjudication for a Level 5 Position of Public Trust.
New employees of the NPDB and the contractor must attend security
training, sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement, and sign the Rules of
Behavior which is renewed annually. Authorized users are given role-
based access to the system on a limited need-to-know basis. All
physical and logical access to the system is removed upon termination
of employment. External users, who are responsible for meeting Title IV
reporting and/or querying requirements to the NPDB, are responsible for
determining their eligibility to access the NPDB through a self-
certification process which requires completing an Entity Registration
form. All external users must acknowledge the Rules of Behavior. All
external users must re-register every two years to access the NPDB.
Both HRSA and the contractor maintain lists of authorized users.
2. Physical Safeguards involve physical controls that are in place
24 hours a day/7 days a week such as identification badge access,
cipher locks, locked hardware cages, man trap with biometric hand
scanner, security guard monitoring, and closed circuit TV. All sites
are protected with fire and environmental safety controls.
3. Technical Safeguards include firewalls, network intrusion
detection, host-based intrusion detection and file integrity
monitoring, user identification, and passwords restrictions. All Web-
based traffic is encrypted using 128 bit SSL and all network traffic is
encrypted internally.
4. Administrative Safeguards involve certification and
accreditation that is required every three years, which authorizes
operation of the system based on acceptable risk. Security assessments
are conducted continuously throughout the year to verify compliance
with all required controls.
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF RECORDS:
HRSA is working with NARA to obtain the appropriate retention
value.
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
Director, Division of Practitioner Data Banks, Bureau of Health
Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, Room 8-103,
Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
Subject to the exemption from the Privacy Act notification
procedure requirement, information is available upon request, to the
persons or entities, or to the authorized agents in such form or manner
as the Secretary prescribes. Currently, the subject of a report is
notified via U.S. mail when a report concerning the individual is
submitted to the NPDB via Subject Notification Document (SND). This
procedure is unchanged by the exemption.
REQUESTS BY MAIL:
Practitioners may submit a ``Request for Information Disclosure''
to the address under system location for any report on themselves. The
request must contain the following: Name, address, date of birth,
gender, Social Security Number (optional), professional schools and
years of graduation, and the professional license(s). For license,
include: The license number, the field of licensure, the name of the
State or Territory in which the license is held, and DEA registration
number(s). The practitioner must submit a signed and notarized self-
query request.
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION:
Submitting a request under false pretenses is a criminal offense
and subject to a civil monetary penalty of up to $11,000 for each
violation.
REQUESTS IN PERSON:
Due to security considerations, the NPDB cannot accept requests in
person.
REQUESTS BY TELEPHONE:
Practitioners may provide all of the identifying information stated
above to the NPDB Customer Service Center operator. Before the data
request is fulfilled, the operator will return a paper copy of this
information for verification, signature and notarization.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Although this system will be exempt from the Privacy Act access
requirement, the exemption will be limited and discretionary. An
individual health care practitioner may continue to seek access to his
or her records in the NPDB by submitting a self-query request form on-
line at: www.npdb-hipdb.hrsa.gov. The requests are submitted over the
web using the Integrated Query and Reporting Service (IQRS), Query and
Reporting Extensible Markup Language Service (QRXS), Interface Control
Document (ICD) Transfer Program (ITP) or the Proactive Disclosure
Service (PDS). Self-query, as described previously, may be initiated
via the electronic system and is completed using the conventional mail
system. Requesters, including self-queries, will receive an accounting
of disclosure that has been made of their records, if any. The
exemption will prevent law enforcement query activity from being
disclosed to the health care practitioner in response to a self-query.
Notwithstanding the access exemption, a practitioner may request
access to his or her full query history (i.e., including law
enforcement query activity, if any), by submitting a written request to
the System Manager identified above and following the same procedures
indicated under ``Notification Procedure.'' The request will be
processed pursuant to the agency's discretionary access authority under
45 CFR 5b.11(d).
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
Because of the system's exemption, the procedures for disputing a
NPDB report will not apply to any query history information that is
exempt from access. The NPDB routinely mails a copy of any report filed
in it to the subject individual. A subject individual may contest the
accuracy of information in the NPDB concerning himself or herself and
file a dispute. To dispute the accuracy of the information, the
individual must contact the NPDB and the reporting entity to: (1)
Request for the reporting entity to file correction to the report; and
(2) request the information be entered into a ``disputed'' status and
submit a statement regarding the basis for the inaccuracy of the
information in the report. If the reporting entity declines to change
the disputed report or takes no actions, the subject may request that
the Secretary of HHS review the disputed report. In order to seek a
Secretarial Review, the subject must: (1) Provide written documentation
containing clear and brief factual information regarding the
information of the report; (2) submit supporting documentation or
justification substantiating that the reporting entity's information is
inaccurate; and (3) submit proof that the subject individual has
attempted to
[[Page 19299]]
resolve the disagreement with reporting entity but was unsuccessful.
The Department can only determine whether the report was legally
required to be filed and whether the report accurately depicts the
action taken and the reporter's basis for action. Additional detail on
the process of dispute resolution and Secretarial Review process can be
found at 45 CFR 60.14 of the NPDB regulations.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
The records contained in the system are submitted by the following
entities: (1) Insurance companies and others who have made payment as a
result of a malpractice action or claim, (2) State Boards of Medical
and Dental Examiners; (3) State Licensing Boards; (4) hospitals and
other health care entities; (5) DEA; and (6) Federal entities which
employ health practitioners or who have authority to sanction such
practitioners covered by a Federal program. Section 1921 of the Social
Security Act expands reporting of actions submitted by State health
care practitioner licensing and certification authorities (including
medical and dental boards), State entity licensing and certification
authorities, peer review organizations and private accreditation
organizations.
SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE ACT:
The Secretary has exempted this system from certain provisions of
the Act. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(k)(2) and 45 CFR
5b.11(b)(ii)(L), this system is exempt from subsections 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d)(1)-(4), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f).
[FR Doc. 2012-7612 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P