Automated Commercial Environment Required for the Transmission of Advance Ocean and Rail Cargo Information, 19030-19032 [2012-7558]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
19030
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2012 / Notices
appear on the Employment Eligibility
Verification (Form I–9). Therefore,
employers may not request proof of
Syrian citizenship when completing the
Employment Eligibility Verification
(Form I–9). If presented with EADs that
are unexpired on their face, employers
should accept such EADs as valid ‘‘List
A’’ documents so long as the EADs
reasonably appear to be genuine and to
relate to the employee. Refer to the
‘‘Note to All Employees’’ section for
important information about your rights
if your employer rejects lawful
documentation, requires additional
documentation, or otherwise
discriminates against you because of
your citizenship or immigration status,
or national origin.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Note to All Employers
Employers are reminded that the laws
requiring employment eligibility
verification and prohibiting unfair
immigration-related employment
practices remain in full force. This
notice does not supersede or in any way
limit applicable employment
verification rules and policy guidance,
including those rules setting forth
reverification requirements. For
questions, employers may call the
USCIS Customer Assistance Office at 1–
800–357–2099. The USCIS Customer
Assistance Office accepts calls in
English and Spanish only. Employers
may also call the Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office of Special Counsel for
Immigration-Related Unfair
Employment Practices (OSC), Employer
Hotline at 1–800–255–8155.
Note to Employees
Employees or applicants may call the
DOJ OSC Worker Information Hotline at
1–800–255–7688 for information
regarding employment discrimination
based upon citizenship or immigration
status and national origin, unfair
documentary practices related to the
Employment Eligibility Verification
(Form I–9), and discriminatory practices
related to E-Verify. Employers must
accept any document or combination of
documents acceptable for the
Employment Eligibility Verification
(Form I–9) completion if the
documentation reasonably appears to be
genuine and to relate to the employee.
Employers may not require extra or
additional documentation beyond what
is required for the Employment
Eligibility Verification (Form I–9)
completion. Further, employees who
receive an initial mismatch via E-Verify
must be given an opportunity to
challenge the mismatch, and employers
are prohibited from taking adverse
action against such employees based on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Mar 28, 2012
Jkt 226001
the initial mismatch unless and until EVerify returns a final non-confirmation.
The Hotline accepts calls in multiple
languages. Additional information is
available on the OSC Web site at https://
www.justice.gov/crt/about/osc/.
Note Regarding Federal, State and
Local Government Agencies (Such as
Departments of Motor Vehicles)
State and local government agencies
are permitted to create their own
guidelines when granting certain
benefits. Each state may have different
laws, requirements, and determinations
about what documents you need to
provide to prove eligibility for certain
benefits. If you are applying for a state
or local government benefit, you may
need to provide the state or local
government agency with documents that
show you are a TPS beneficiary and/or
show you are authorized to work based
on TPS. Examples are:
(1) Your EAD that has a valid
expiration date; and/or
(2) A copy of your Application for
Temporary Protected Status Approval
Notice (Form I–797), if you receive one
from USCIS.
Check with the state or local agency
regarding which document(s) the agency
will accept. You may also provide the
agency with a copy of this notice.
Some benefit-granting agencies use
the Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements (SAVE) Program to verify
the current immigration status of
applicants for public benefits. If such an
agency has denied your application
based solely or in part on a SAVE
response following completion of all
required SAVE verification steps, the
agency must offer you the opportunity
to appeal the decision in accordance
with the agency’s procedures. If the
agency has completed all SAVE
verification and you do not believe the
response is correct, you may make an
InfoPass appointment for an in-person
interview at a local USCIS office.
Detailed information on how to make
corrections, make an appointment, or
submit a written request can be found
at the SAVE Web site at www.uscis.gov/
save, then by choosing ‘‘How to Correct
Your Records’’ from the menu on the
right.
[FR Doc. 2012–7498 Filed 3–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
[CBP Dec. No. 12–06]
Automated Commercial Environment
Required for the Transmission of
Advance Ocean and Rail Cargo
Information
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Various U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) regulations
require the transmission of advance
cargo information to CBP through a
CBP-approved electronic data
interchange (EDI) system. CBP recently
completed the testing of the Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE) for the
transmission of advance ocean and rail
cargo information. This notice
announces that, after a six month
transition period, ACE will be the only
CBP-approved EDI for submitting
required advance information for ocean
and rail cargo.
DATES: On September 29, 2012, ACE
will be the only CBP-approved EDI for
transmitting to CBP required advance
information for ocean and rail cargo.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Maskell, Office of International
Trade, Susan.Maskell@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Section 343(a) of the Trade Act of
2002, as amended by the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002 (19
U.S.C. 2071 note) (referred to in this
notice as the Trade Act), directed U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
promulgate regulations providing for the
mandatory transmission of electronic
cargo information by way of a CBPapproved electronic data interchange
(EDI) system before the cargo is brought
into or departs the United States by any
mode of commercial transportation
(ocean, air, rail or truck). The required
cargo information is that which is
reasonably necessary to enable high-risk
shipments to be identified for purposes
of ensuring cargo safety and security
and preventing smuggling pursuant to
the laws enforced and administered by
CBP. To effectuate the provisions of the
Trade Act, CBP published a final rule in
the Federal Register in 2003, requiring
the advance electronic transmission of
information pertaining to cargo prior to
its being brought into, or sent from, the
United States by sea, air, rail or truck.
See Required Advance Electronic
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2012 / Notices
Presentation of Cargo Information, 68
FR 68140, December 5, 2003.1
Section 203 of the Security and
Accountability for Every Port Act of
2006, Public Law 109–347, 120 Stat.
1884 (SAFE Port Act) directed the
Secretary of Homeland Security, acting
through the Commissioner of CBP, to
promulgate regulations to require the
electronic transmission to the
Department of Homeland Security of
additional data elements for improved
high-risk targeting, including
appropriate security elements of entry
data, as determined by the Secretary.
This additional data was to be provided
as advanced information with respect to
cargo destined for importation into the
United States prior to loading of such
cargo on vessels at foreign seaports. In
2008, pursuant to the Trade Act and the
SAFE Port Act, CBP published an
interim final rule in the Federal
Register requiring importers and
carriers to submit additional
information pertaining to maritime
cargo before the cargo is brought into
the United States by means of a CBPapproved electronic interchange system.
See Importer Security Filing and
Additional Carrier Requirements, 73 FR
71730, November 25, 2008. The interim
final rule is known to the trade as the
‘‘Importer Security Filing’’ (ISF) or ‘‘10
+ 2’’ rule.
Advance Ocean and Rail Cargo Data
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The CBP regulations pertaining to the
submission of the data required in
advance of arrival for ocean and rail
cargo are set forth in title 19 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 4, 123,
and 149.2 Sections 4.7(b)(2), 4.7(b)(3)(i),
123.91(a), and 149.2 pertain to the
method of transmission of the advance
ocean and rail data relevant to this
notice. They generally require the
transmission of the advance data
1 The Trade Act, enacted on August 6, 2002, was
amended by the Maritime Transportation Security
Act of 2002, enacted on November 25, 2002. On
October 31, 2002, CBP published a final rule to
require the advance and accurate presentation of
certain manifest information before cargo is laden
aboard a vessel at a foreign port. This rule was
promulgated under the authority of 19 U.S.C. 1431.
CBP encouraged the presentation of this
information electronically. See 67 FR 66318. This
final rule is known to the trade as the ‘‘24 hour
rule.’’
2 For specific information about the requirements
to provide advance cargo information to CBP,
please see the following sections of title 19 CFR: 4.7
Inward foreign manifest, production on demand,
contents and form, advance filing of cargo
declaration; 4.7a Inward manifest, information
required, alternative forms; 4.7c Vessel stow plan;
4.7d Container status messages; 123.91 Electronic
information for rail cargo required in advance of
arrival; and Part 149 Importer Security Filing.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Mar 28, 2012
Jkt 226001
through the EDI system approved by
CBP.
Section 4.7(b)(2), pertaining to
vessels, provides that the electronic
cargo declaration information must be
transmitted through the CBP Automated
Manifest System (AMS) or any
electronic data interchange system
approved by CBP to replace the AMS
system for this purpose. Section
4.7(b)(3)(i), also pertaining to vessels,
provides that a non-vessel operating
common carrier (NVOCC) must
electronically transmit the
corresponding required cargo
declaration information directly to CBP
through the vessel AMS system (or other
system approved by CBP for this
purpose), or in the alternative, fully
disclose and present the required cargo
declaration information for the related
cargo to the vessel carrier which is
required to present this information to
CBP via the vessel AMS system (or other
CBP approved system).
Section 123.91(a) requires rail carriers
to use a CBP-approved electronic data
interchange system to submit the
required advance information.
Section 149.2, pertaining to maritime
cargo, requires the Importer Security
Filing data elements to be submitted
through a CBP-approved electronic
interchange system.
M1 Test for Ocean and Rail Data
Transmission
CBP recently conducted a National
Customs Automation Program (NCAP)
test, known as M1, concerning the
transmission of required advance ocean
and rail data through ACE. The test was
announced in two Federal Register
notices (M1 notices). See 75 FR 64737,
October 20, 2010 and 76 FR 42721, July
19, 2011.
CBP sought participants that were
transmitting the required advance ocean
and rail data to CBP in different formats
to facilitate their transition to ACE in a
controlled environment.3 M1 test
participants were chosen based on the
specific type of software format they
used to transmit the required advance
data. The goal of the M1 test was to
ensure that each transmission format
was fully compatible with ACE. By
working with this select group of
participants, CBP was able to verify that
each transmission format functioned
properly with ACE and to develop
effective processes and guidelines.
These processes and guidelines will
enable the rest of the affected trade
3 For more information on the types of compatible
software utilized to transmit the required advance
data, please see the Implementation of the Test
section of the October 20, 2010 M1 notice (75 FR
64737 at 64738).
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19031
community to quickly and efficiently
transition to ACE. The M1 participants
began submitting live data through ACE
on November 30, 2011.
CBP stated in the M1 notices that
upon the successful completion of the
M1 test, CBP would publish another
notice to announce that after a transition
period, ACE would be the only CBPapproved EDI for transmitting required
advance data for ocean and rail cargo.
M1 Test Results
The M1 test has been successfully
completed. To date, 24 trade
participants have completed the
certification testing described in the M1
test notice and are transmitting their
advance ocean and rail cargo
information in ACE. Another 11 trade
participants are currently involved in
certification testing. The port of
Baltimore, Maryland began utilizing
ACE for processing ocean cargo on
November 30, 2011. The ports of
Buffalo, New York and Brownsville,
Texas began using ACE for processing
ocean and rail cargo on December 5,
2011. To date, 91 ports are using ACE
for ocean and/or rail processing.
CBP verified that all electronic data
interchanges are compatible with ACE
and has prepared ACE Implementation
Guidelines, which are posted at
www.CBP.gov. The ACE Implementation
Guidelines include the appropriate
standards needed for each referenced
type of software to work with ACE.
These standards will enable transmitters
to conform their own software to ACE
or to acquire new software that is
compatible with ACE. In addition to the
ACE Implementation Guidelines, CBP
has posted informational notices, user
guides, and Web-based training at www.
CBP.gov.
ACE as the Only CBP-Approved EDI for
Required Advance Ocean and Rail
Cargo Information
For purposes of sections 4.7(b)(2),
4.7(b)(3)(i), 123.91(a), and 149.2 of title
19 CFR, beginning on September 29,
2012, ACE will be the only CBPapproved EDI for transmitting the
required advance information for ocean
and rail cargo. Until this date, a
transition period is in effect during
which ACE or AMS may be used to
transmit the required advance
information for ocean and rail cargo.
CBP will continue to work with the
affected trade community to ensure a
complete and efficient transition to
ACE. CBP encourages all transmitters to
undergo the ACE certification process
described in the M1 notices during the
transition period to ensure total ACE
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
19032
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2012 / Notices
functionality.4 Total ACE functionality
means that the transmitter will retain all
of the existing functionality currently
available as well as the new
functionalities only available through
ACE.5 Transmitters should contact the
Client Representative Branch at 571–
468–5500 to make arrangements to
begin the ACE certification process.
Although AMS will continue to
operate during the transition period and
may still be used in the normal course
of business for other purposes, it will no
longer be available for purposes related
to transmitting to CBP required advance
ocean and rail cargo information
beginning on September 29, 2012.
Dated: March 26, 2012.
Thomas Winkowski,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2012–7558 Filed 3–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Geological Survey
Announcement of National Geospatial
Advisory Committee Meeting
U.S. Geological Survey,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4 Participants were required to undergo the
certification process, described in detail in the
October 20, 2010 M1 notice, as a prerequisite for
participating in the M1 test. See 75 FR 64737 at
64739.
5 For more information on the additional
functionalities available through ACE, please see
the ACE Functionality section of the October 20,
2010 M1 notice (75 FR 64737 at 64739).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Mar 28, 2012
Jkt 226001
Dated: March 22, 2012.
Ivan DeLoatch,
Executive Director, Federal Geographic Data
Committee.
[FR Doc. 2012–7479 Filed 3–28–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311–AM–P
The National Geospatial
Advisory Committee (NGAC) will meet
on April 17–18, 2012 at the American
Institute of Architects Building, 1735
New York Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20006. The meeting will be held in
the Gallery Room. The NGAC, which is
composed of representatives from
governmental, private sector, non-profit,
and academic organizations, was
established to advise the Federal
Geographic Data Committee on
management of Federal geospatial
programs, the development of the
National Spatial Data Infrastructure, and
the implementation of Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–16. Topics to be addressed at
the meeting include:
—FGDC Guidance to the NGAC
—FGDC Update
—Innovative Strategies
—National Enhanced Elevation
Assessment
SUMMARY:
—Landsat
—Subcommittee Reports
The meeting will include an
opportunity for public comment on
April 18. Comments may also be
submitted to the NGAC in writing.
Members of the public who wish to
attend the meeting must register in
advance. Please register by contacting
Arista Maher at the U.S. Geological
Survey (703–648–6283, amaher@usgs.
gov). Registrations are due by April 13,
2012. While the meeting will be open to
the public, seating may be limited due
to room capacity.
DATES: The meeting will be held from
8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on April 17 and from
8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. on April 18.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Mahoney, U.S. Geological Survey (206–
220–4621).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings
of the National Geospatial Advisory
Committee are open to the public.
Additional information about the NGAC
and the meeting is available at www.
fgdc.gov/ngac.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[DN 2888]
Certain Semiconductor Integrated
Circuit Devices and Products
Containing Same Notice of Receipt of
Complaint; Solicitation of Comments
Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received a complaint
entitled Certain Semiconductor
Integrated Circuit Devices and Products
Containing Same, DN 2888; the
Commission is soliciting comments on
any public interest issues raised by the
complaint or complainant’s filing under
section 210.8(b) of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.8(b)).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, Secretary to the
Commission, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2000. The public version of the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has received a complaint
and a submission pursuant to section
210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure filed on behalf
of Microchip Technology Incorporated
on March 23, 2012. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in
the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain semiconductor
integrated circuit devices and products
containing same. The complaint names
as respondents Intersil Corporation of
CA; Zilker Labs, Inc. of TX; and
Techwell, Inc. of CA.
Proposed respondents, other
interested parties, and members of the
public are invited to file comments, not
to exceed five (5) pages in length,
inclusive of attachments, on any public
interest issues raised by the complaint
or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments
should address whether issuance of the
relief specifically requested by the
complainant in this investigation would
affect the public health and welfare in
the United States, competitive
conditions in the United States
economy, the production of like or
directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the requested
remedial orders are used in the United
States;
(ii) Identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the requested remedial
orders;
(iii) Identify like or directly
competitive articles that complainant,
E:\FR\FM\29MRN1.SGM
29MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19030-19032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7558]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
[CBP Dec. No. 12-06]
Automated Commercial Environment Required for the Transmission of
Advance Ocean and Rail Cargo Information
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Various U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations
require the transmission of advance cargo information to CBP through a
CBP-approved electronic data interchange (EDI) system. CBP recently
completed the testing of the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) for
the transmission of advance ocean and rail cargo information. This
notice announces that, after a six month transition period, ACE will be
the only CBP-approved EDI for submitting required advance information
for ocean and rail cargo.
DATES: On September 29, 2012, ACE will be the only CBP-approved EDI for
transmitting to CBP required advance information for ocean and rail
cargo.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Maskell, Office of International
Trade, Susan.Maskell@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 343(a) of the Trade Act of 2002, as amended by the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C. 2071 note) (referred to
in this notice as the Trade Act), directed U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to promulgate regulations providing for the mandatory
transmission of electronic cargo information by way of a CBP-approved
electronic data interchange (EDI) system before the cargo is brought
into or departs the United States by any mode of commercial
transportation (ocean, air, rail or truck). The required cargo
information is that which is reasonably necessary to enable high-risk
shipments to be identified for purposes of ensuring cargo safety and
security and preventing smuggling pursuant to the laws enforced and
administered by CBP. To effectuate the provisions of the Trade Act, CBP
published a final rule in the Federal Register in 2003, requiring the
advance electronic transmission of information pertaining to cargo
prior to its being brought into, or sent from, the United States by
sea, air, rail or truck. See Required Advance Electronic
[[Page 19031]]
Presentation of Cargo Information, 68 FR 68140, December 5, 2003.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Trade Act, enacted on August 6, 2002, was amended by the
Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, enacted on November
25, 2002. On October 31, 2002, CBP published a final rule to require
the advance and accurate presentation of certain manifest
information before cargo is laden aboard a vessel at a foreign port.
This rule was promulgated under the authority of 19 U.S.C. 1431. CBP
encouraged the presentation of this information electronically. See
67 FR 66318. This final rule is known to the trade as the ``24 hour
rule.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 203 of the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act
of 2006, Public Law 109-347, 120 Stat. 1884 (SAFE Port Act) directed
the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Commissioner of
CBP, to promulgate regulations to require the electronic transmission
to the Department of Homeland Security of additional data elements for
improved high-risk targeting, including appropriate security elements
of entry data, as determined by the Secretary. This additional data was
to be provided as advanced information with respect to cargo destined
for importation into the United States prior to loading of such cargo
on vessels at foreign seaports. In 2008, pursuant to the Trade Act and
the SAFE Port Act, CBP published an interim final rule in the Federal
Register requiring importers and carriers to submit additional
information pertaining to maritime cargo before the cargo is brought
into the United States by means of a CBP-approved electronic
interchange system. See Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier
Requirements, 73 FR 71730, November 25, 2008. The interim final rule is
known to the trade as the ``Importer Security Filing'' (ISF) or ``10 +
2'' rule.
Advance Ocean and Rail Cargo Data
The CBP regulations pertaining to the submission of the data
required in advance of arrival for ocean and rail cargo are set forth
in title 19 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 4, 123, and 149.\2\
Sections 4.7(b)(2), 4.7(b)(3)(i), 123.91(a), and 149.2 pertain to the
method of transmission of the advance ocean and rail data relevant to
this notice. They generally require the transmission of the advance
data through the EDI system approved by CBP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For specific information about the requirements to provide
advance cargo information to CBP, please see the following sections
of title 19 CFR: 4.7 Inward foreign manifest, production on demand,
contents and form, advance filing of cargo declaration; 4.7a Inward
manifest, information required, alternative forms; 4.7c Vessel stow
plan; 4.7d Container status messages; 123.91 Electronic information
for rail cargo required in advance of arrival; and Part 149 Importer
Security Filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4.7(b)(2), pertaining to vessels, provides that the
electronic cargo declaration information must be transmitted through
the CBP Automated Manifest System (AMS) or any electronic data
interchange system approved by CBP to replace the AMS system for this
purpose. Section 4.7(b)(3)(i), also pertaining to vessels, provides
that a non-vessel operating common carrier (NVOCC) must electronically
transmit the corresponding required cargo declaration information
directly to CBP through the vessel AMS system (or other system approved
by CBP for this purpose), or in the alternative, fully disclose and
present the required cargo declaration information for the related
cargo to the vessel carrier which is required to present this
information to CBP via the vessel AMS system (or other CBP approved
system).
Section 123.91(a) requires rail carriers to use a CBP-approved
electronic data interchange system to submit the required advance
information.
Section 149.2, pertaining to maritime cargo, requires the Importer
Security Filing data elements to be submitted through a CBP-approved
electronic interchange system.
M1 Test for Ocean and Rail Data Transmission
CBP recently conducted a National Customs Automation Program (NCAP)
test, known as M1, concerning the transmission of required advance
ocean and rail data through ACE. The test was announced in two Federal
Register notices (M1 notices). See 75 FR 64737, October 20, 2010 and 76
FR 42721, July 19, 2011.
CBP sought participants that were transmitting the required advance
ocean and rail data to CBP in different formats to facilitate their
transition to ACE in a controlled environment.\3\ M1 test participants
were chosen based on the specific type of software format they used to
transmit the required advance data. The goal of the M1 test was to
ensure that each transmission format was fully compatible with ACE. By
working with this select group of participants, CBP was able to verify
that each transmission format functioned properly with ACE and to
develop effective processes and guidelines. These processes and
guidelines will enable the rest of the affected trade community to
quickly and efficiently transition to ACE. The M1 participants began
submitting live data through ACE on November 30, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For more information on the types of compatible software
utilized to transmit the required advance data, please see the
Implementation of the Test section of the October 20, 2010 M1 notice
(75 FR 64737 at 64738).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP stated in the M1 notices that upon the successful completion of
the M1 test, CBP would publish another notice to announce that after a
transition period, ACE would be the only CBP-approved EDI for
transmitting required advance data for ocean and rail cargo.
M1 Test Results
The M1 test has been successfully completed. To date, 24 trade
participants have completed the certification testing described in the
M1 test notice and are transmitting their advance ocean and rail cargo
information in ACE. Another 11 trade participants are currently
involved in certification testing. The port of Baltimore, Maryland
began utilizing ACE for processing ocean cargo on November 30, 2011.
The ports of Buffalo, New York and Brownsville, Texas began using ACE
for processing ocean and rail cargo on December 5, 2011. To date, 91
ports are using ACE for ocean and/or rail processing.
CBP verified that all electronic data interchanges are compatible
with ACE and has prepared ACE Implementation Guidelines, which are
posted at www.CBP.gov. The ACE Implementation Guidelines include the
appropriate standards needed for each referenced type of software to
work with ACE. These standards will enable transmitters to conform
their own software to ACE or to acquire new software that is compatible
with ACE. In addition to the ACE Implementation Guidelines, CBP has
posted informational notices, user guides, and Web-based training at
www.CBP.gov.
ACE as the Only CBP-Approved EDI for Required Advance Ocean and Rail
Cargo Information
For purposes of sections 4.7(b)(2), 4.7(b)(3)(i), 123.91(a), and
149.2 of title 19 CFR, beginning on September 29, 2012, ACE will be the
only CBP-approved EDI for transmitting the required advance information
for ocean and rail cargo. Until this date, a transition period is in
effect during which ACE or AMS may be used to transmit the required
advance information for ocean and rail cargo.
CBP will continue to work with the affected trade community to
ensure a complete and efficient transition to ACE. CBP encourages all
transmitters to undergo the ACE certification process described in the
M1 notices during the transition period to ensure total ACE
[[Page 19032]]
functionality.\4\ Total ACE functionality means that the transmitter
will retain all of the existing functionality currently available as
well as the new functionalities only available through ACE.\5\
Transmitters should contact the Client Representative Branch at 571-
468-5500 to make arrangements to begin the ACE certification process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Participants were required to undergo the certification
process, described in detail in the October 20, 2010 M1 notice, as a
prerequisite for participating in the M1 test. See 75 FR 64737 at
64739.
\5\ For more information on the additional functionalities
available through ACE, please see the ACE Functionality section of
the October 20, 2010 M1 notice (75 FR 64737 at 64739).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although AMS will continue to operate during the transition period
and may still be used in the normal course of business for other
purposes, it will no longer be available for purposes related to
transmitting to CBP required advance ocean and rail cargo information
beginning on September 29, 2012.
Dated: March 26, 2012.
Thomas Winkowski,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2012-7558 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
