Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 18137-18140 [2012-7283]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
of this AD, or the inspection specified in
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, is done.
(i) If the fuel access panel is found cracked
during any inspection required by this AD:
Before further flight, replace the fuel access
panel with a new fuel access panel having P/
N 85714231–003, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–57–22, Revision B, dated
February 16, 2011.
(ii) Within 6,000 flight hours after the
initial inspection required by paragraph (g)(2)
of this AD, do the actions required in
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, unless the
replacement required by paragraph (g)(2)(i) of
this AD is done.
(i) If the fuel access panel is found cracked
during any inspection required by this AD:
Before further flight, replace the fuel access
panel with a new fuel access panel having
P/N 85714232–003, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–57–23, Revision B, dated
February 16, 2011.
(ii) Within 12,000 flight hours after the
initial inspection required by paragraph
(h)(2) of this AD, do the actions required by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, unless the
replacement required by paragraph (h)(2)(i)
of this AD is done.
(h) Inspection and Replacement of P/N
85714232–001
Within 1,200 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, do an external detailed
inspection of the outer wing access panels
having P/N 85714232–001 to locate the rivets
of the identification plates, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–23,
Revision B, dated February 16, 2011. If the
rivets of the identification plate are found:
No further action is required by this
paragraph for that fuel access panel. If the
rivets of the identification plate cannot be
found: Before further flight, do the actions in
paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD.
(1) Remove fuel access panels having P/N
85714232–001 and inspect the panels to
determine if the identification plate is
installed, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–57–23, Revision B, dated
February 16, 2011. If the identification plate
is found: No further action is required by
paragraph (h) of this AD for that fuel access
panel.
(i) If the identification plate cannot be
found, and the job detail number stamped on
the underside of the access panel does not
match any of those specified in table 1 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–57–23, Revision B, dated
February 16, 2011: No further action is
required by paragraph (h) of this AD for that
fuel access panel.
(ii) If the identification plate cannot be
found, and the job detail number stamped on
the underside of the fuel access panel does
match any of those specified in table 1 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–57–23, Revision B, dated
February 16, 2011: Before further flight,
replace the fuel access panel with a new fuel
access panel having P/N 85714232–003, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–57–23, Revision B, dated February 16,
2011.
(2) Do an external detailed inspection on
fuel access panels having P/N 85714232–001
for cracking, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–57–23, Revision B, dated
February 16, 2011. If no cracking is found:
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 1,200 flight hours until the
replacement specified in paragraph (h)(2)(i)
of this AD, or the inspection specified by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD is done.
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a fuel access panel having
P/N 85714231–001 and a job detail number
listed in table 1 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–57–22, Revision B, dated February 16,
2011; or having P/N 85714232–001 and a job
detail number listed in table 1 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–57–23, Revision B, dated
February 16, 2011; on any airplane.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
18137
and the following service information, for
related information.
(1) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–22,
Revision B, dated February 16, 2011.
(2) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–57–23,
Revision B, dated February 16, 2011.
Issued in Renton, Washington on March
16, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–7357 Filed 3–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(i) Parts Installation
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for
inspections and fuel access panel
replacements required by this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84–57–22, Revision A, dated
December 9, 2010; or Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84–57–23, Revision A, dated
December 9, 2010.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO,
ANE–170, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the ACO, send it to Attn: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety,
FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(l) Related Information
Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2011–04, dated March 8, 2011,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0299; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–029–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 747–100, 747–200B, 747–
200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400,
747–400F, and 747SR series airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by
reports of broken and damaged latch pin
retention bolts of the main deck side
cargo door (MDSCD), latch pin
migration, and broken latch pin fittings.
This proposed AD would require
various repetitive inspections of the
MDSCD latch pin fittings, measuring the
latch pin, and related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary; and
modifying the latch pin fittings and
installing new latch pins and latch pin
fasteners. We are proposing this AD to
prevent loss of the cargo door and rapid
depressurization of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27MRP1.SGM
27MRP1
18138
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; phone: 206–544–5000, extension
1; fax: 206–766–5680; email:
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet:
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6432; fax:
425–917–6590; email: Bill.Ashforth@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2012–0299; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–029–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received damage reports on
MDSCD latch pin fittings. Six operators
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:56 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
have reported that broken latch pin
retention bolts were found on eight
airplanes. On one airplane that had
accumulated 101,609 total flight hours
and 12,862 total flight cycles, the
retention bolts on both the #9 and #10
latch pin fittings were broken. Latch pin
#10 had migrated aft and was not
engaging the latch cam. On another
airplane that had accumulated 33,983
total flight hours and 4,723 total flight
cycles, the retention bolt on the #10
latch pin fitting was broken and the #9
latch pin was damaged. On another
airplane that had accumulated 67,188
total flight hours and 14,440 total flight
cycles, the retention bolt for the #10
latch pin fitting was completely
sheared, which allowed the latch pin to
migrate aft until it no longer engaged the
door latch cam. On four airplanes, only
the retention bolt on the #10 latch pin
fitting was found to be broken. On one
airplane, the retention bolt on the #10
latch pin fitting was damaged. A loose,
broken, or missing retention bolt can
result in a migrated latch pin, which can
become disengaged from the cargo door
latch cams and lead to increased loads
in the adjacent latch pin fittings and
latch cams. Increased loads can cause
damage to the cargo door latch
mechanism and/or the lower sill
structure. The migration of two or more
latch pins and subsequent failure of the
latch mechanism or lower sill structure
can result in the inability of the cargo
door to carry limit loads. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in the loss of the cargo door and rapid
depressurization of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16, 2011, as revised by
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
52A2294, Revision 2, dated December
12, 2011. For information on the
procedures and compliance times, see
this service information at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
Docket No. FAA–2012–0299.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
repetitive detailed inspections of the 10
MDSCD latch pin fittings to detect
loose, broken, missing, or damaged
retention bolts and nuts; measuring
latch pin diameter; and related
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
investigative and corrective actions, if
necessary. The related investigative
actions include a torque check of the
latch pin retention bolt to determine if
the bolt is broken; and checking the
latch pin for migration and, if necessary,
a detailed inspection for damage of the
latch pin fitting and the adjacent
(forward and aft) latch pin fittings, the
door cutout structure, the affected latch
cam and the adjacent latch cams, and
the door structure. The corrective
actions include replacing the latch pin,
the retention bolt, and related parts with
a new latch pin, retention bolt, and
related parts; and repairing of any
damage to the adjacent door, door
cutout structure, and latch cams.
This proposed AD would also require
modifying the MDSCD latch pin fittings,
replacing the latch pins with new latch
pins, and replacing the latch pin
retention fasteners with new latch pin
retention fasteners. In addition, this
proposed AD would require postmodification/replacement repetitive
detailed inspections of the MDSCD latch
pin fittings to detect damaged latch
pins, and loose, broken, or missing
retention bolts and nuts; measuring the
latch pin diameter; and related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. The related investigative
actions include checking the latch pin
for migration and, if necessary, a
detailed inspection for damage of the
latch pin fitting and the adjacent latch
pin fittings, the door cutout structure,
the affected latch cam and the adjacent
latch cams on the door, and the door
structure. The corrective actions include
replacing the latch pin, the retention
bolt, and related parts with a new latch
pin, retention bolt, and related parts; or
repairing any damage.
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Information
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16,
2011. as revised by Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–52A2294, Revision 2,
dated December 12, 2011, specifies to
contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain
conditions, but this proposed AD would
require repairing those conditions in
one of the following ways:
• In accordance with a method that
we approve; or
• Using data that meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and
that have been approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) whom
we have authorized to make those
findings.
E:\FR\FM\27MRP1.SGM
27MRP1
18139
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 77 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Detailed inspection, including
torque check.
Modification ............................
Post-modification detailed inspection.
We estimate the following costs to do
necessary repairs and replacements that
Cost on U.S. operators
$0
$340 per inspection cycle ......
$26,180 per inspection cycle.
$5,530
$6,465 ....................................
$497,805.
$0
4 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $340 per inspection cycle.
11 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $935.
2 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $170 per inspection cycle.
Cost per
product
$170 per inspection cycle ......
$13,090 per inspection cycle.
Parts cost
would be required based on the results
of the proposed inspection. We have no
way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these repairs.
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Repair/Replacements (Groups 1 and 2 airplanes) ......
Repair/Replacements (Group 3 airplanes) ...................
7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 ...........................
7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 ...........................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Parts cost
Cost per
product
$11,478
12,254
$12,073
12,849
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 11,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 747–100, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–
200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–400F, and
747SR series airplanes; certificated in any
category; as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16, 2011.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 52, Doors.
The Proposed Amendment
(e) Unsafe Condition
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
This AD was prompted by reports of
broken and damaged latch pin retention bolts
of the main deck side cargo door (MDSCD),
latch pin migration, and broken latch pin
fittings. We are issuing this AD to prevent
loss of the cargo door and rapid
depressurization of the airplane.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2012–0299; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–029–AD.
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection and Corrective Action
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
PO 00000
(f) Compliance
Sfmt 4702
At the applicable compliance time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
52A2294, Revision 2, dated December
E:\FR\FM\27MRP1.SGM
27MRP1
18140
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Proposed Rules
12, 2011, except as provided by paragraph
(j)(2) of this AD: Do a detailed inspection of
the 10 MDSCD latch pin fittings to detect
loose, broken, damaged, or missing retention
bolts and nuts; measure the latch pin
diameter; and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, except as
required by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD; in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16,
2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–52A2294, Revision 2, dated
December 12, 2011. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before
further flight. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed those
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011.
(h) Modification of Latch Pin Fittings and
Replacement of Latch Pins and Latch Pin
Retention Fasteners
At the time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–52A2294, Revision 1, dated
August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–52A2294, Revision 2,
dated December 12, 2011, except as provided
by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD: Modify the 10
MDSCD latch pin fittings, replace the latch
pins with new latch pins, and replace the
latch pin retention fasteners with new latch
pin retention fasteners, except as required by
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011. Accomplishment of the actions in
paragraph (h) of this AD terminates the
inspection required in paragraph (g) of this
AD.
(i) Post-Modification Inspection and
Corrective Action
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
At the applicable compliance time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011, except as provided by paragraph (j)(2)
of this AD: Do a detailed inspection of the
10 MDSCD latch pin fittings to detect loose,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:00 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
broken, damaged, or missing retention bolts
and nuts; measure the latch pin diameter;
and do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions, except as required by
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011. Do the applicable related investigative
and corrective actions before further flight.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed those specified in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–52A2294, Revision 1, dated
August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–52A2294, Revision 2,
dated December 12, 2011.
(j) Exceptions to Service Bulletin
Specifications
(1) If any damage is found during any
inspection required by this AD, and Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011, specifies to contact Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight,
repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l) of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16,
2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–52A2294, Revision 2, dated
December 12, 2011, specifies a compliance
time relative to the issue date of that service
bulletin, this AD requires compliance within
the specified compliance time after the
effective date of this AD.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–52A2294, dated July 8,
2010.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane and 14
CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(m) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Bill Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6432; fax: 425–
917–6590; email: Bill.Ashforth@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; phone:
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax: 206–766–
5680; email: me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may also review the referenced service
information in the docket at
www.regulations.gov (refer to Docket No.
FAA–2012–0299). You may review copies of
the referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, the
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
19, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–7283 Filed 3–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\27MRP1.SGM
27MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18137-18140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7283]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0299; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-029-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 747-100, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400,
747-400F, and 747SR series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by
reports of broken and damaged latch pin retention bolts of the main
deck side cargo door (MDSCD), latch pin migration, and broken latch pin
fittings. This proposed AD would require various repetitive inspections
of the MDSCD latch pin fittings, measuring the latch pin, and related
investigative and corrective actions if necessary; and modifying the
latch pin fittings and installing new latch pins and latch pin
fasteners. We are proposing this AD to prevent loss of the cargo door
and rapid depressurization of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 11, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
[[Page 18138]]
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; phone: 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; email: me.boecom@boeing.com;
Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-
917-6432; fax: 425-917-6590; email: Bill.Ashforth@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0299;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-029-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received damage reports on MDSCD latch pin fittings. Six
operators have reported that broken latch pin retention bolts were
found on eight airplanes. On one airplane that had accumulated 101,609
total flight hours and 12,862 total flight cycles, the retention bolts
on both the 9 and 10 latch pin fittings were broken.
Latch pin 10 had migrated aft and was not engaging the latch
cam. On another airplane that had accumulated 33,983 total flight hours
and 4,723 total flight cycles, the retention bolt on the 10
latch pin fitting was broken and the 9 latch pin was damaged.
On another airplane that had accumulated 67,188 total flight hours and
14,440 total flight cycles, the retention bolt for the 10
latch pin fitting was completely sheared, which allowed the latch pin
to migrate aft until it no longer engaged the door latch cam. On four
airplanes, only the retention bolt on the 10 latch pin fitting
was found to be broken. On one airplane, the retention bolt on the
10 latch pin fitting was damaged. A loose, broken, or missing
retention bolt can result in a migrated latch pin, which can become
disengaged from the cargo door latch cams and lead to increased loads
in the adjacent latch pin fittings and latch cams. Increased loads can
cause damage to the cargo door latch mechanism and/or the lower sill
structure. The migration of two or more latch pins and subsequent
failure of the latch mechanism or lower sill structure can result in
the inability of the cargo door to carry limit loads. This condition,
if not corrected, could result in the loss of the cargo door and rapid
depressurization of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011. For information on the
procedures and compliance times, see this service information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for Docket No. FAA-2012-0299.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require repetitive detailed inspections of
the 10 MDSCD latch pin fittings to detect loose, broken, missing, or
damaged retention bolts and nuts; measuring latch pin diameter; and
related investigative and corrective actions, if necessary. The related
investigative actions include a torque check of the latch pin retention
bolt to determine if the bolt is broken; and checking the latch pin for
migration and, if necessary, a detailed inspection for damage of the
latch pin fitting and the adjacent (forward and aft) latch pin
fittings, the door cutout structure, the affected latch cam and the
adjacent latch cams, and the door structure. The corrective actions
include replacing the latch pin, the retention bolt, and related parts
with a new latch pin, retention bolt, and related parts; and repairing
of any damage to the adjacent door, door cutout structure, and latch
cams.
This proposed AD would also require modifying the MDSCD latch pin
fittings, replacing the latch pins with new latch pins, and replacing
the latch pin retention fasteners with new latch pin retention
fasteners. In addition, this proposed AD would require post-
modification/replacement repetitive detailed inspections of the MDSCD
latch pin fittings to detect damaged latch pins, and loose, broken, or
missing retention bolts and nuts; measuring the latch pin diameter; and
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. The related
investigative actions include checking the latch pin for migration and,
if necessary, a detailed inspection for damage of the latch pin fitting
and the adjacent latch pin fittings, the door cutout structure, the
affected latch cam and the adjacent latch cams on the door, and the
door structure. The corrective actions include replacing the latch pin,
the retention bolt, and related parts with a new latch pin, retention
bolt, and related parts; or repairing any damage.
Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Information
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August
16, 2011. as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011, specifies to contact the
manufacturer for instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but
this proposed AD would require repairing those conditions in one of the
following ways:
In accordance with a method that we approve; or
Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.
[[Page 18139]]
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 77 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detailed inspection, including 4 work-hours x $85 $0 $340 per inspection $26,180 per
torque check. per hour = $340 cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
Modification..................... 11 work-hours x $85 $5,530 $6,465............. $497,805.
per hour = $935.
Post-modification detailed 2 work-hours x $85 $0 $170 per inspection $13,090 per
inspection. per hour = $170 cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do necessary repairs and
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these repairs.
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair/Replacements (Groups 1 and 2 airplanes) 7 work-hours x $85 per hour = $11,478 $12,073
$595.
Repair/Replacements (Group 3 airplanes)....... 7 work-hours x $85 per hour = 12,254 12,849
$595.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-0299; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-029-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by May 11, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-200B,
747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400F, and 747SR series
airplanes; certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16,
2011.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of broken and damaged latch pin
retention bolts of the main deck side cargo door (MDSCD), latch pin
migration, and broken latch pin fittings. We are issuing this AD to
prevent loss of the cargo door and rapid depressurization of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection and Corrective Action
At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December
[[Page 18140]]
12, 2011, except as provided by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD: Do a
detailed inspection of the 10 MDSCD latch pin fittings to detect
loose, broken, damaged, or missing retention bolts and nuts; measure
the latch pin diameter; and do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions, except as required by paragraph (j)(1) of
this AD; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August
16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed those specified
in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011.
(h) Modification of Latch Pin Fittings and Replacement of Latch Pins
and Latch Pin Retention Fasteners
At the time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August
16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011, except as provided by paragraph
(j)(2) of this AD: Modify the 10 MDSCD latch pin fittings, replace
the latch pins with new latch pins, and replace the latch pin
retention fasteners with new latch pin retention fasteners, except
as required by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011. Accomplishment of the actions in paragraph (h) of this AD
terminates the inspection required in paragraph (g) of this AD.
(i) Post-Modification Inspection and Corrective Action
At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011,
except as provided by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD: Do a detailed
inspection of the 10 MDSCD latch pin fittings to detect loose,
broken, damaged, or missing retention bolts and nuts; measure the
latch pin diameter; and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, except as required by paragraph (j)(1) of this
AD; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16,
2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011. Do the applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed those specified
in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011.
(j) Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications
(1) If any damage is found during any inspection required by
this AD, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011, specifies to
contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before further flight, repair
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (l) of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011, specifies a
compliance time relative to the issue date of that service bulletin,
this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time
after the effective date of this AD.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-52A2294, dated July 8, 2010.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the
person identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571,
Amendment 45, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(m) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Bill Ashforth,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6432; fax: 425-917-6590;
email: Bill.Ashforth@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; phone: 206-
544-5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; email:
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may also review the referenced service information in the docket at
www.regulations.gov (refer to Docket No. FAA-2012-0299). You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, the FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 19, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-7283 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P