Reinstate Index to Chapter III in 20 CFR, 18290-18295 [2012-7182]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
18290
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Notices
rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of CME
and on CME’s Web site at https://
www.cmegroup.com/market-regulation/
rule-filings.html. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CME–
2012–05 and should be submitted on or
before April 17, 2012.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change
Section 19(b) of the Act 3 directs the
Commission to approve a proposed rule
change of a self-regulatory organization
if it finds that such proposed rule
change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
such organization. The Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act, in particular with the requirements
of Section 17A of the Act,4 and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
CME. Specifically, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a clearing
agency be designed to promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions because it
should allow CME to enhance its
services in clearing IRS and Interest
Rate Futures products, thereby
promoting the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of derivative
3 15
U.S.C. 78s(b).
4 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. In approving this proposed
rule change, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
agreements, contracts, and
transactions.5
In its filing, CME requested that the
Commission approve this proposed rule
change on an accelerated basis. CME has
articulated three reasons for granting
approval on an accelerated basis. One,
the products covered by this filing and
CME’s operations as a derivatives
clearing organization for such products,
are regulated by the CFTC under the
CEA. Two, the proposed rule change
relates solely to IRS and Interest Rate
Futures products and therefore relate
solely to CME’s swaps clearing activities
and do not significantly relate to CME’s
functions as a clearing agency for
security-based swaps. Three, not
approving this request on an accelerated
basis will have a significant impact on
the swap clearing business of CME as a
designated clearing organization.
The Commission finds good cause for
granting approval of the proposed rule
change before the thirtieth day after
publication of the notice of its filing
because: (i) The proposed rule change
does not significantly affect any
securities clearing operations of the
clearing agency (whether in existence or
contemplated by its rules) or any related
rights or obligations of the clearing
agency or persons using such service;
(ii) the clearing agency has indicated
that not providing accelerated approval
would have a significant impact on its
IRS clearing business as a designated
clearing organization; and (iii) the
activity relating to the non-security
clearing operations of the clearing
agency for which the clearing agency is
seeking approval is subject to regulation
by another federal regulator.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (SR–CME–2012–
05) is approved on an accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–7279 Filed 3–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA–2012–0018]
Reinstate Index to Chapter III in 20 CFR
Social Security Administration.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
5 15
6 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
At the request of the Office of
the Federal Register, we are reinstating
the finding aid ‘‘Index to Chapter III’’ in
Title 20 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR). The finding aid
contains a list of all Acquiescence
Rulings published in the Federal
Register from January 11, 1990 through
April 1, 2012.
DATES: The notice is effective March 27,
2012. The Office of the Federal Register
will include the Index in the April 2012
edition of Title 20, chapter III of the
CFR.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Sussman, Social Security
Administration, Office of Regulations,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21235–6401, (410) 965–1767. For
information on eligibility or filing for
benefits, call our national toll-free
number, 1–800–772–1213 or TTY 1–
800–325–0778, or visit our Internet site,
Social Security Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We are reinstating the ‘‘Index to
Chapter III’’ as a finding aid in our
chapter of Title 20 of the CFR. The
Index lists the Acquiescence Rulings we
published in the Federal Register from
January 11, 1990, through April 1, 2012.
The Index last appeared as a finding aid
in the April 1, 2008 edition of our
chapter of the CFR.
You may also find a listing of
Acquiescence Rulings on our Web site
at https://mwww.socialsecurity.gov/
OP_Home/rulings/rulfind1.html.
The Office of the Federal Register
requested that we publish this notice,
including the text of the Index, which
follows. The Office of the Federal
Register will include the Index in the
April 2012 edition of Title 20, chapter
III of the CFR.
Index to Chapter III
INDEX TO CHAPTER III—SOCIAL
SECURITY ACQUIESCENCE RULINGS
EDITORIAL NOTE: This listing is
provided for information purposes only.
It is compiled and kept up-to-date by
the Social Security Administration.
This listing contains all Acquiescence
Rulings (ARs) published in the Federal
Register under the requirements of 20
CFR 402.35(b)(2) during the period from
January 11, 1990, through April 1, 2012.
The listing includes the AR number,
title, publication date and the Federal
Register reference number. (The
parenthetical number that follows each
AR number refers to the United States
judicial circuit involved.) This notice
also lists ARs that were rescinded
during this period. In addition, SSA has
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
included Federal Register references for
three prior cumulative AR listing
notices.
SSA believes this publication will
assist individuals in finding ARs.
The CFR may not state the circuitwide
standard in effect when SSA has
determined that the holding in a
decision of a United States Court of
Appeals is at variance with SSA’s
national interpretation.
ACQUIESCENCE RULINGS
Published cumulative lists of ARs
relating to claims under title II and title
XVI of the Social Security Act and part
B of the Black Lung Benefits Act were
issued for ARs published prior to
January 11, 1990.
1. The first notice announcing 14 ARs
issued during the period from January
23, 1986, through April 30, 1986, was
published in the Federal Register on
June 4, 1986 (51 FR 20354).
2. A second notice announcing 12
additional ARs issued during the period
from May 20, 1986, through March 31,
1987, was published in the Federal
Register on August 7, 1987 (52 FR
29911).
3. A third notice announcing 11 more
ARs, issued during the period from May
1, 1987, through November 14, 1988, the
withdrawal of one AR that was issued
earlier, and the withdrawal of one of the
ARs issued during this period was
published in the Federal Register on
July 10, 1990 (55 FR 28302).
AR 86–2R(2) Rosenberg v.
Richardson, 538 F.2d 487 (2d Cir. 1976);
Capitano v. Secretary of HHS, 732 F.2d
1066 (2d Cir. 1984)—Entitlement of a
Deemed Widow When a Legal Widow is
Entitled on the Same Earnings Record—
Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: June 25, 1992, at 57 FR
28527.
NOTE: The original AR for the Second
Circuit Court of Appeals’ holding in
Rosenberg and Capitano (AR 86–2(2)),
issued January 23, 1986, was rescinded
and replaced by this revised AR.
AR 86–19R(11) Woodson v.
Schweiker, 656 F.2d 1169 (5th Cir.
1981)—Interpretation of the Deemed
Marriage Provision—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Published: June 25, 1992, at 57 FR
28524.
NOTE: The original AR applicable in
the Eleventh Circuit for the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals’ holding in Woodson
(AR 86–19(11)), issued May 22, 1986,
was rescinded and replaced by this
revised AR.
AR 90–1(9) Paxton v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 856 F.2d
1352 (9th Cir. 1988)—Treatment of
Dependent’s Portion of Augmented
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
Veterans Benefit Paid Directly to
Veteran—Title XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Published: July 16, 1990, at 55 FR
28946. Rescinded—See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 90–2(2) Ruppert v. Bowen, 871
F.2d 1172 (2d Cir. 1989)—Evaluation of
a Rental Subsidy as In-Kind Income for
Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
Benefit Calculation Purposes—Title XVI
of the Social Security Act.
Published: July 16, 1990, at 55 FR
28947.
AR 90–3(4) Smith v. Bowen, 837 F.2d
635 (4th Cir. 1987)—Use of Vocational
Expert or Other Vocational Specialist in
Determining Whether a Claimant Can
Perform Past Relevant Work—Titles II
and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: July 16, 1990, at 55 FR
28949. Rescinded—See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 90–4(4) Culbertson v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 859 F.2d
319 (4th Cir. 1988), Young v. Bowen,
858 F.2d 951 (4th Cir. 1988)—Waiver of
Administrative Finality in Proceedings
Involving Unrepresented Claimants
Who Lack the Mental Competence to
Request. Administrative Review—Titles
II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: July 16, 1990, at 55 FR
28943.
AR 90–5(2) Kier v. Sullivan, 888 F.2d
244 (2d Cir. 1989), reh’g denied, January
22, 1990—Assessment of Residual
Functiona1 Capacity in Disabled
Widows’ Cases—Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Published: September 18, 1990, at 55
FR 38400. Rescinded—See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 90–6(1) Cassus v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 893 F.2d
454 (lst Cir. 1990), reh’g denied, April
9, 1990—Assessment of Residual
Functional Capacity in Disabled
Widows’ Cases—Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Published: September 18, 1990, at 55
FR 38398. Rescinded—See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 90–7(9) Ruff v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d
915 (9th Cir. 1990)—Assessment of
Residual Functional Capacity in
Disabled Widows’ Cases—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Published: September 18, 1990, at 55
FR 38402. Rescinded—See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 91–1(5) Lidy v. Sullivan, 911 F.2d
1075 (5th Cir. 1990)—Right to Subpoena
an examining Physician for Crossexamination Purposes—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: December 31, 1991, at 56
FR 67625 as AR 91–X(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18291
Correction Notice Published: May 1,
1992, at 57 FR 18899—AR number
changed to 91–1(5).
AR 92–1(3) Mazza v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 903 F.2d
953 (3d Cir. 1990)—Order of
Effectuation in Concurrent Application
Cases (Title II/Title XVI).
Published: January 10, 1992, at 57 FR
1190 as AR 91–X(3).
Correction Notice Published: May 1,
1992, at 57 FR 18899—AR number
changed to 92–1(3).
AR 92–2(6) Difford v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 910 F.2d
1316 (6th Cir. 1990), reh ’g denied,
February 7, 1991—Scope of Review on
Appeal in a Medical Cessation of
Disability Case—Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Published: March 17, 1992, at 57 FR
9262.
AR 92–3(4) Branham v. Heckler, 775
F.2d 1271 (4th Cir. 1985); Flowers v.
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, 904 F.2d 211 (4th Cir. 1990)—
What Constitutes a Significant-WorkRelated Limitation of Function.
Published: March 10, 1992, at 57 FR
8463. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 92–4(11) Bloodsworth v. Heckler,
703 F.2d 1233 (11th Cir. 1983)—Judicial
Review of an Appeals Council Dismissal
of a Request for Review of an
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
Decision.
Published: April 8, 1992, at 57 FR
11961.
AR 92–5(9) Quinlivan v. Sullivan, 916
F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1990)—Meaning of
the Term ‘‘Against Equity and Good
Conscience’’ in the Rules for Waiver of
Recovery of an Overpayment—Titles II
and XVI of the Social Security Act; Title
IV of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977.
Published: June 22, 1992, at 57 FR
27783.
AR 92–6(10) Walker v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 943 F.2d
1257 (l0th Cir. 1991)—Entitlement to
Trial Work Period Before Approval of an
Award for Benefits and Before Twelve
Months Have Elapsed Since Onset of
Disability—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: September 17, 1992, at 57
FR 43007.
AR 92–7(9) Gonzales v. Sullivan, 914
F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1990)—Effect of
Initial Determination Notice Language
on the Application of Administrative
Finality-Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Published: September 30. 1992, at 57
FR 45061.
AR 93–1(4) Branham v. Heckler, 775
F.2d 1271 (4th Cir. 1985); Flowers v.
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18292
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Notices
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, 904 F.2d 211 (4th Cir. 1990)—
What Constitutes an Additional and
Significant Work-Related Limitation of
Function—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: April 29, 1993, at 58 FR
25996.
NOTE: The original AR for the Fourth
Circuit Court of Appeals’ holding in
Branham and Flowers (AR 92–31(4)),
issued March 10, 1992, was revised to
reflect a regulatory change regarding the
IQ Listing range. There were no other
substantive changes to this AR.
Rescinded-See section on Rescissions in
this notice.
AR 93–2(2) Conley v. Bowen, 859 F.2d
261 (2d Cir. 1988)—Determination of
Whether an Individual with a Disabling
Impairment Has Engaged in Substantial
Gainful Activity Following a
Reentitlement Period—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Published: May 17, 1993, at 58 FR
28887. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 93–3(6) Akers v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 966 F.2d
205 (6th Cir. 1992)—Attorney’s Fees
Based in Part on Continued Benefits
Paid to Social Security Claimants—Title
II of the Social Security Act.
Published: July 29, 1993, at 58 FR
40662. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 93–4(2) Condon and Brodner v.
Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 (2d Cir. 1988)—
Attorney’s Fees Based in Part on
Continued Benefits Paid to Social
Security Claimants—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Published: July 29, 1993, at 58 FR
40663. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 93–5(11) Shoemaker v. Bowen,
853 F.2d 858 (11th Cir. 1988)—
Attorney’s Fees Based in Part on
Continued Benefits Paid to Social
Security Claimants—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Published: July 29, 1993, at 58 FR
40665. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 93–6(8) Brewster on Behalf of
Keller v. Sullivan, 972 F.2d 898 (8th Cir.
1992)—Interpretation of the Secretary’s
Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death—Title II of the Social Security
Act
Published: August 16, 1993, at 58 FR
43369. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 94–1(10) Wolfe v. Sullivan, 988
F.2d 1025 (10th Cir. 1993)—
Contributions to Support re:
Posthumous Illegitimate Child—Title II
of the Social Security Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
Published: June 27, 1994, at 59 FR
33003.
AR 94–2(4) Lively v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 820 F.2d
1391 (4th Cir. 1987)—Effect of Prior
Disability Findings on Adjudication of a
Subsequent Disability Claim Arising
Under the Same Title of the Social
Security Act—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: July 7, 1994, at 59 FR
34849. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 95–1(6) Preslar v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 14 F.3d
1107 (6th Cir. 1994)— Definition of
Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals
Close to Retirement Age—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: May 4, 1995, at 60 FR
22091. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 95–2(9) Hodge v. Shalala. 27 F.3d
430 (9th Cir. 1994)—Workers’
Compensation—Proration of a LumpSum Award for Permanent Disability
Over the Remainder of an Individual’s
Working Life Under Oregon Workers’
Compensation Law—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Published: July 12, 1995, at 60 FR
35987.
AR 96–1(6) DeSonier v. Sullivan, 906
F.2d 228 (6th Cir. 1990)—Method of
Application of State Intestate
Succession Law in Determining
Entitlement to Child’s Benefits—Title II
of the Social Security Act.
Published: June 3, 1996, at 61 FR
27942.
AR 97–1(1) Parisi By Cooney v.
Chater, 69 F.3d 614 (1st Cir. 1995)—
Reduction of Benefits Under the Family
Maximum in Cases Involving Dual
Entitlement—Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Published: January 13, 1997, at 62 FR
1792. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 97–2(9) Gamble v. Chater, 68 F.3d
319 (9th Cir. 1995)—Amputation of a
Lower Extremity—When the Inability to
Afford the Cost of a Prosthesis Meets the
Requirements of Section 1.10C of the
Listing of Impairments—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: January 13, 1997, at 62 FR
1791. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 97–3(11) Daniels on Behalf of
Daniels v. Sullivan, 979 F.2d 1516 (11th
Cir. 1992)—Application of a State’s
Intestacy Law Requirement that
Paternity be Established During the
Lifetime of the Father—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Published: August 4, 1997, at 62 FR
41989.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AR 97–4(9) Chavez v. Bowen, 844
F.2d 691 (9th Cir. 1988)—Effect of a
Prior Final Decision That a Claimant is
Not Disabled, And of Findings
Contained Therein, On Adjudication of
a Subsequent Disability Claim Arising
Under the Same Title of the Social
Security Act—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: December 3, 1997, at 62 FR
64038.
AR 98–1(8) Newton v. Chater, 92 F.3d
688 (8th Cir. 1996)—Entitlement to Trial
Work Period Before Approval of an
Award for Benefits and Before Twelve
Months Have Elapsed Since Onset of
Disability—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: February 23, 1998, at 63
FR 9037. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 98–2(8) Sird v. Chater, 105 F.3d
401 (8th Cir. 1997)—Mental
Retardation—What Constitutes an
Additional and Significant WorkRelated Limitation of Function—Titles
II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: February 24, 1998, at 63
FR 9279. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 98–3(6) Dennard v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 907 F.2d
598 (6th Cir. 1990)—Effect of a Prior
Finding of the Demands of Past Work on
Adjudication of a Subsequent Disability
Claim Arising Under the Same Title of
the Social Security Act—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: June 1, 1998. at 63 FR
29770.
AR 98–4(6) Drummond v.
Commissioner of Social Security, 126
F.3d 1337 (6th Cir. 1997)—Effect of
Prior Findings on Adjudication of a
Subsequent Disability Claim Arising
Under the Same Title of the Social
Security Act—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: June 1, 1998, at 63 FR
29771.
AR 98–5(8) State of Minnesota v.
Apfel, 151 F.3d 742 (8th Cir. 1998)—
Coverage for Employees Under a
Federal-State Section 218 Agreement or
Modification and Application of the
Student Services Exclusion From
Coverage to Services Performed by
Medical Residents—Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Published: October 30, 1998, at 63 FR
58444.
AR 99–1(2) Florez on Behalf of
Wallace v. Callahan, 156 F.3d 438 (2d
Cir. 1998)— Supplemental Security
Income—Deeming of Income From a
Stepparent to a Child When the Natural
Parent is Not Living In the Same
Household—Title XVI of the Social
Security Act.
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Notices
Published: February 1, 1999, at 64 FR
4923. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 99–2(8) Kerns v. Apfel, 160 F.3d
464 (8th Cir. 1998)—Definition of
Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals
Close to Retirement Age—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: March 11, 1999, at 64 FR
12205. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 99–3(5) McQueen v. Apfel, 168
F.3d 152 (5th Cir. 1999)— Definition of
Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals
Close to Retirement Age—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: May 27, 1999, at 64 FR
28853. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 99–4(11) Bloodsworth v. Heckler,
703 F.2d 1233 (11th Cir. 1983)—Judicial
Review of an Appeals Council Dismissal
of a Request for Review of an
Administrative Law Judge Decision—
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security
Act.
Published: October 26, 1999, at 64 FR
57687.
NOTE: The original AR for the
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals’
holding in Bloodsworth (AR 92–4(11)),
issued April 8, 1992, was revised to
delete a parenthetical statement and to
update the AR’s language. These
revisions were technical corrections
only and did not involve any
substantive changes.
AR 00–1(4) Albright v. Commissioner
of the Social Security Administration,
174 F.3d 473 (4th Cir. 1999)—Effect of
Prior Disability Findings on
Adjudication of a Subsequent Disability
Claim—Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Published: January 12, 2000, at 65 FR
1936.
AR 00–2(7) Hickman v. Apfel. 187
F.3d 683 (7th Cir. 1999)—Evidentiary
Requirements for Determining Medical
Equivalence to a Listed Impairment—
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security
Act.
Published: May 3, 2000, at 65 FR
25783. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 00–3(10) Haddock v. Apfel, 196
F.3d 1084 (l0th Cir. 1999)—Use of
Vocational Expert Testimony and the
Dictionary of Occupational Titles Under
20 CFR 404.1566, 416.966—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: June 20, 2000, at 65 FR
38312. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 00–4(2) Curry v. Apfel, 209 F.3d
117 (2d Cir. 2000)—Burden of Proving
Residual Functional Capacity at Step
Five of the Sequential Evaluation
Process for Determining Disability—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security
Act.
Published: September 11, 2000, at 65
FR 54879. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 00–5(6) Salamalekis v. Apfel, 221
F.3d 828 (6th Cir. 2000)—Entitlement to
Trial Work Period Before Approval of an
Award of Benefits and Before 12 Months
Have Elapsed Since the Alleged Onset
of Disability—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: November 15, 2000, at 65
FR 69116. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 01–1(3) Sykes v. Apfel, 228 F.3d
259 (3d Cir. 2000)—Using the Grid
Rules as a Framework for
Decisionmaking When an Individual’s
Occupational Base is Eroded by a
Nonexertional Limitation—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: January 25, 2001, at 66 FR
7829.
AR 03–1(7) Blakes v. Barnhart, 331
F.3d 565 (7th Cir. 2003)—Cases
Involving Sections 12.05 and 112.05 of
the Listing of Impairments That Are
Remanded By a Court for Further
Proceedings Under Titles II and XVI of
the Social Security Act.
Published: December 23, 2003, at 613
FR 74279.
AR 04–1(9) Howard on behalf of Wolff
v. Barnhart, 341 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir.
2003)—Applicability of the Statutory
Requirement for Pediatrician Review in
Childhood Disability Cases to the
Hearings and Appeals Levels of the
Administrative Review Process Under
Title XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: April 26, 2004, at 69 FR
22578.
AR 05–1(9) Gillett-Netting v.
Barnhart, 371 F.3d 593 (9th Cir. 2004),
reh’g denied, December 14, 2004
—Applicability of State Law and the
Social Security Act in Determining
Whether a Child Conceived by Artificial
Means after an Insured Person’s Death is
Eligible for Child’s Insurance Benefits—
Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: September 22, 2005, at 70
FR 55656.
AR 06–1(2) Fowlkes v. Adamec, 432
F.3d 90 (2d Cir. 2005)—Determining
Whether an Individual is a Fugitive
Felon Under the Social Security Act
(Act)—Titles II and XVI of the Act.
Published: April 6, 2000, at 71 FR
17551.
RESCISSIONS WITHOUT
REPLACEMENT ARs
AR 86–1(9) Summy v. Schweiker, 688
F.2d 1233 (9th Cir. 1982)—Third party
payments for medical care or services—
Title XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 5,
1994, at 59 FR 34444.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18293
AR 86–6(3) Aubrey v. Richardson, 462
F.2d 782 (3d Cir. 1972); Shelnutt v.
Heckler, 723 F.2d 1131 (3d Cir. 1983)—
Interpretation of the Secretary’s
Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death—Title II of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July
14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86–7(5) Autrey v. Harris, 639 F.2d
1233 (5th Cir. 1981); Wages v.
Schweiker, 659 F.2d 59 (5th Cir. 1981)—
Interpretation of the Secretary’s
Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death—Title II of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July
14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86–8(6) Johnson v. Califano, 607
F.2d 1178 (6th Cir. 1979)—
Interpretation of the Secretary’s
Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death—Title II of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July
14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86–9(9) Secretary of Health,
Education and Welfare v. Meza, 386
F.2d 389 (9th Cir. 1966); Gardner v.
Wilcox, 370 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1966)—
Interpretation of the Secretary’s
Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death—Title II of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July
14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86–10(10) Edwards v. Califano,
619 F.2d 865 (10th Cir. 1980)—
Interpretation of the Secretary’s
Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death—Title II of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July
14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86–11(11) Autrey v. Harris, 639
F.2d 1233 (5th Cir. 1981)—
Interpretation of the Secretary’s
Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death—Title II of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July
14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86–17(9) Owens v. Schweiker, 692
F.2d 80 (9th Cir. 1982)—Child’s
Benefits—Title II of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
October 28, 1998, at 63 FR 57727.
AR 87–1(6) Webb v. Richardson, 472
F.2d 529 (6th Cir. 1972)—Attorneys’
Fees—Single Fee, Not to Exceed 25
Percent of Past-Due Benefits, Set by
Tribunal Which Ultimately Upholds the
Claim—Title II of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: March
3, 1995, at 60 FR 11977.
AR 87–2(11) Butterworth v. Bowen,
796 F.2d 1379 (11th Cir. 1986)—The
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18294
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Notices
Conditions under Which the Appeals
Council has the Right to Reopen and
Revise Prior Decisions—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 7,
1998, at 63 FR 36726.
AR 87–3(9) Hart v. Bowen, 799 F.2d
567 (9th Cir. 1986)—Current Market
Value of an Installment Sales Contract
as an Excess Resource.
Notice of Rescission Published:
February 9, 1995, at 60 FR 7782.
AR 87–4(8) Iamarino v. Heckler, 795
F.2d 59 (8th Cir. 1986)—Positive
Presumption of Substantial Gainful
Activity (SGA) for Sheltered Work.
Notice of Rescission Published: July
11, 2000, at 65 FR 42793.
AR 87–5(3) Velazquez v. Heckler, 802
F.2d 680 (3d Cir. 1986)—Consideration
of Vocational Factors in Past Work
Determination.
Notice of Rescission Published: July
16, 1990, at 55 FR 28943.
AR 88–1(11) Patterson v. Bowen, 799
F.2d 1455 (11th Cir. 1986), reh’g denied,
February 12, 1987—Use of the Age
Factor in the Medical-Vocational
Guidelines in Making Disability
Decisions.
Notice of Rescission Published: April
6, 2000, at 65 FR 18143.
AR 88–3(7) McDonald v. Bowen, 800
F.2d 153 (7th Cir. 1986), amended on
reh’g, 818 F.2d 559 (7th Cir. 1987)—
Entitlement to Benefits Where a Person
Returns to Work Less Than 12 Months
After Onset of Disability.
Notice of Rescission Published: June
10, 2002, at 67 FR 39781.
AR 88–5(1) McCuin v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 817 F.2d
161 (1st Cir. 1987)—Reopening by the
Appeals Council of Decisions of
Administrative Law Judges under Titles
II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
February 23, 1994, at 59 FR 8650.
AR 88–7(5) Hickman v. Bowen, 803
F.2d 1377 (5th Cir. 1986)—Evaluation of
Loans of In-Kind Support and
Maintenance for Supplemental Security
Income Benefit Calculation Purposes.
Notice of Rescission Published:
September 8, 1992, at 57 FR 40918.
AR 90–1(9) Paxton v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 856 F .2d
1352 (9th Cir.1988)—Treatment of
Dependent’s Portion of Augmented
Veterans Benefit Paid Directly to
Veteran—Title XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
November 17, 1994, at 59 FR 59416.
AR 90–3(4) Smith v. Bowen, 837 F.2d
635 (4th Cir. 1987)—Use of Vocational
Expert or Other Vocational Specialist in
Determining Whether a Claimant Can
Perform Past Relevant Work—Titles II
and XVI of the Social Security Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
Notice of Rescission Published:
August 26, 2003, at 68 FR 51317.
AR 90–5(2) Kier v. Sullivan, 888 F.2d
244 (2d Cir. 1989), reh’g denied, January
22, 1990—Assessment of Residual
Functional Capacity in Disabled
Widows’ Cases—Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: May
22, 1991, at 56 FR 23592.
AR 90–6(1) Cassas v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 393 F.2d
454 (1st Cir. 1990), reh’g denied, April
9, 1990—Assessment of Residual
Functional Capacity in Disabled
Widows’ Cases—Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: May
22, 1991, at 56 FR 23591.
AR 90–7(9) Ruff v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d
915 (9th Cir. 1990)—Assessment of
Residual Functional Capacity in
Disabled Widows’ Cases—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: May
22, 1991, at 56 FR 23592.
AR 92–3(4) Branham v. Heckler, 775
F.2d 1271 (4th Cir. 1985); Flowers v.
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, 904 F.2d 211 (4th Cir. 1990)—
What Constitutes a Significant WorkRelated Limitation of Function.
Notice of Rescission Published:
August 21, 2000, at 65 FR 50784.
AR 92–6(10) Walker v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 943 F.2d
1257 (10th Cir. 1991)—Entitlement to
Trial Work Period Before Approval of an
Award for Benefits and Before Twelve
Months Have Elapsed Since Onset of
Disability-Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: June
10, 2002, at 67 FR 39871.
AR 93–1(4) Branham v. Heckler, 775
F.2d 1271 (4th Cir. 1985); Flowers v.
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, 904 F.2d 211 (4th Cir. 1990)—
What Constitutes an Additional and
Significant Work-Related Limitation of
Function—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
August 21, 2000, at 65 FR 50784.
AR. 93–2(2) Conley v. Bowen, 859
F.2d 261 (3d Cir. 1988)—Determination
of Whether an Individual With a
Disabling Impairment Has Engaged in
Substantial Gainful Activity Following a
Reentitlement Period—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
August 10, 2000, at 65 FR 42793.
AR 93–3(6) Akers v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 966 F.2d
205 (6th Cir. 1992)—Attorney’s Fees
Based in Part on Continued Benefits
Paid to Social Security Claimants—Title
II of the Social Security Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Rescission Published: April
14, 2000, at 65 FR 20239.
AR 93–4(2) Condon and Brodner v.
Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 (2d Cir. 1988)—
Attorney’s Fees Based in Part on
Continued Benefits Paid to Social
Security Claimants—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April
14, 2000, at 65 FR 20239.
AR 93–5(11) Shoemaker v. Bowen,
853 F.2d 858 (11th Cir. 1988)—
Attorney’s Fees Based in Part on
Continued Benefits Paid to Social
Security Claimants—Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April
14, 2000, at 65 FR 20239.
AR 93–6(8) Brewster on Behalf of
Keller v. Sullivan, 972 F.2d 898 (8th Cir.
1992)—Interpretation of the Secretary’s
Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death—Title II of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July
14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 94–2(4) Lively v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 820 F.2d
1391 (4th Cir. 1987)—Effect of Prior
Disability Findings on Adjudication of a
Subsequent Disability Claim Arising
Under the Same Title of the Social
Security Act—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
January 12, 2000, at 65 FR 1936.
AR 95–1(6) Preslar v. Secretary of
Health and Human Services, 14 F.3d
1107 (6th Cir. 1994)—Definition of
Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals
Close to Retirement Age—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April
6, 2000, at 65 FR 18144.
AR 97–1(1) Parisi By Cooney v.
Chater, 69 F.3d 814 (1st Cir. 1995)—
Reduction of Benefits Under the Family
Maximum In Cases Involving Dual
Entitlement—Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
October 27, 1999, at 64 FR 57919.
AR 97–2(9) Gamble v. Chater, 68 F.3d
319 (9th Cir. 1995)—Amputation of a
Lower Extremity—When the Inability to
Afford the Cost of a Prosthesis Meets the
Requirements of Section 1.10C of the
Listing of Impairments—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
November 19, 2001, at 66 FR 58047.
AR 98–1(8) Newton v. Chater, 92 F.3d
688 (8th Cir. 1996)—Entitlement to Trial
Work Period Before Approval of an
Award for Benefits and Before Twelve
Months Have Elapsed Since Onset of
Disability—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: June
10, 2002, at 67 FR 39781.
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 27, 2012 / Notices
AR 98–2(8) Sird v. Chater, 105 F.3d
401 (8th Cir. 1997)—Mental
Retardation—What Constitutes an
Additional and Significant WorkRelated Limitation of Function—Titles
II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
August 21, 2000, at 65 FR 50784.
AR 99–1(2) Florez on Behalf of
Wallace v. Callahan, 156 F.3d 438 (2d
Cir. 1998)— Supplemental Security
Income—Deeming of Income From a
Stepparent to a Child When the Natural
Parent is Not Living in the Same
Household—Title XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: May
15, 2008, at 73 FR 28181.
AR 99–2(8) Kerns v. Apfel, 160 F.3d
164 (8th Cir. 1998)—Definition of
Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals
Close to Retirement Age—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April
6, 2000, at 65 FR 18144.
AR 99–3(5) McQueen v. Apfel, 168
F.3d 152 (5th Cir, 1999)—Definition of
Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals
Close to Retirement Age—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April
6, 2000, at 65 FR 18144.
AR 00–2(7) Hickman v. Apfel, 187
F.3d 683 (7th Cir. 1999)—Evidentiary
Requirements for Determining Medical
Equivalence to a Listed Impairment—
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: March
1, 2006, at 71 FR 10584.
AR 00–3(10) Haddock v. Apfel, 196
F.3d 1084 (10th Cir, 1999)—Use of
Vocational Expert Testimony and the
Dictionary of Occupational Titles Under
20 CFR 404.1566, 416.966—Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
December 4, 2000, at 65 FR 75758.
AR 00–4(2) Curry v. Apfel, 209 F.3d
117 (2d Cir. 2000)—Burden of Proving
Residual Functional Capacity at Step
Five of the Sequential Evaluation
Process for Determining Disability—
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security
Act.
Notice of Rescission Published:
August 26, 2003, at 68 FR 51317.
AR 00–5(6) Salamalekis v. Apfel, 221
F.3d 828 (6th Cir. 2000)—Entitlement to
Trial Work Period Before Approval of an
Award of Benefits and Before 12 Months
Have Elapsed Since the Alleged Onset
of Disability—Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: June
10, 2002, at 67 FR 39781.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Mar 26, 2012
Jkt 226001
Dated: March 20, 2012.
LaTina Burse Greene,
Assistant Deputy Commissioner for
Retirement and Disability Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–7182 Filed 3–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7812]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Decree
Stele’’
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No.
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby
determine that the object to be included
in the exhibition ‘‘Decree Stele’’
imported from abroad for temporary
exhibition within the United States, is
of cultural significance. The object is
imported pursuant to a loan agreement
with the foreign owner or custodian. I
also determine that the exhibition or
display of the exhibit object at the Getty
Villa, Pacific Palisades, CA, from on or
about April 25, 2012, until on or about
March 30, 2015, and at possible
additional exhibitions or venues yet to
be determined, is in the national
interest. I have ordered that Public
Notice of these Determinations be
published in the Federal Register.
SUMMARY:
For
further information, including the art
object list, contact Julie Simpson,
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal
Adviser, U.S. Department of State
(telephone: 202–632–6467). The mailing
address is U.S. Department of State, SA–
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03),
Washington, DC 20522–0505.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: March 20, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012–7348 Filed 3–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
18295
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7833]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition
Determinations: ‘‘Roy Lichtenstein: A
Retrospective’’
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No.
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby
determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘Roy
Lichtenstein: A Retrospective’’ imported
from abroad for temporary exhibition
within the United States, are of cultural
significance. The objects are imported
pursuant to loan agreements with the
foreign owners or custodians. I also
determine that the exhibition or display
of the exhibit objects at The Art Institute
of Chicago, Chicago, IL, from on or
about May 16, 2012, until on or about
September 3, 2012; The National Gallery
of Art, Washington, DC, from on or
about October 14, 2012, until on or
about January 6, 2013, and at possible
additional exhibitions or venues yet to
be determined, is in the national
interest. I have ordered that Public
Notice of these Determinations be
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Julie
Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The
mailing address is U.S. Department of
State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite
5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.
Dated: March 20, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012–7349 Filed 3–26–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 7812]
Industry Advisory Panel: Notice of
Open Meeting
The Industry Advisory Panel of the
Bureau of Overseas Buildings
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18290-18295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7182]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA-2012-0018]
Reinstate Index to Chapter III in 20 CFR
AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: At the request of the Office of the Federal Register, we are
reinstating the finding aid ``Index to Chapter III'' in Title 20 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The finding aid contains a list of
all Acquiescence Rulings published in the Federal Register from January
11, 1990 through April 1, 2012.
DATES: The notice is effective March 27, 2012. The Office of the
Federal Register will include the Index in the April 2012 edition of
Title 20, chapter III of the CFR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Sussman, Social Security
Administration, Office of Regulations, 6401 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, (410) 965-1767. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number,
1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site,
Social Security Online, at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We are reinstating the ``Index to Chapter III'' as a finding aid in
our chapter of Title 20 of the CFR. The Index lists the Acquiescence
Rulings we published in the Federal Register from January 11, 1990,
through April 1, 2012. The Index last appeared as a finding aid in the
April 1, 2008 edition of our chapter of the CFR.
You may also find a listing of Acquiescence Rulings on our Web site
at https://mwww.socialsecurity.gov/OP_Home/rulings/rulfind1.html.
The Office of the Federal Register requested that we publish this
notice, including the text of the Index, which follows. The Office of
the Federal Register will include the Index in the April 2012 edition
of Title 20, chapter III of the CFR.
Index to Chapter III
INDEX TO CHAPTER III--SOCIAL SECURITY ACQUIESCENCE RULINGS
EDITORIAL NOTE: This listing is provided for information purposes
only. It is compiled and kept up-to-date by the Social Security
Administration.
This listing contains all Acquiescence Rulings (ARs) published in
the Federal Register under the requirements of 20 CFR 402.35(b)(2)
during the period from January 11, 1990, through April 1, 2012. The
listing includes the AR number, title, publication date and the Federal
Register reference number. (The parenthetical number that follows each
AR number refers to the United States judicial circuit involved.) This
notice also lists ARs that were rescinded during this period. In
addition, SSA has
[[Page 18291]]
included Federal Register references for three prior cumulative AR
listing notices.
SSA believes this publication will assist individuals in finding
ARs.
The CFR may not state the circuitwide standard in effect when SSA
has determined that the holding in a decision of a United States Court
of Appeals is at variance with SSA's national interpretation.
ACQUIESCENCE RULINGS
Published cumulative lists of ARs relating to claims under title II
and title XVI of the Social Security Act and part B of the Black Lung
Benefits Act were issued for ARs published prior to January 11, 1990.
1. The first notice announcing 14 ARs issued during the period from
January 23, 1986, through April 30, 1986, was published in the Federal
Register on June 4, 1986 (51 FR 20354).
2. A second notice announcing 12 additional ARs issued during the
period from May 20, 1986, through March 31, 1987, was published in the
Federal Register on August 7, 1987 (52 FR 29911).
3. A third notice announcing 11 more ARs, issued during the period
from May 1, 1987, through November 14, 1988, the withdrawal of one AR
that was issued earlier, and the withdrawal of one of the ARs issued
during this period was published in the Federal Register on July 10,
1990 (55 FR 28302).
AR 86-2R(2) Rosenberg v. Richardson, 538 F.2d 487 (2d Cir. 1976);
Capitano v. Secretary of HHS, 732 F.2d 1066 (2d Cir. 1984)--Entitlement
of a Deemed Widow When a Legal Widow is Entitled on the Same Earnings
Record--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: June 25, 1992, at 57 FR 28527.
NOTE: The original AR for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals'
holding in Rosenberg and Capitano (AR 86-2(2)), issued January 23,
1986, was rescinded and replaced by this revised AR.
AR 86-19R(11) Woodson v. Schweiker, 656 F.2d 1169 (5th Cir. 1981)--
Interpretation of the Deemed Marriage Provision--Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Published: June 25, 1992, at 57 FR 28524.
NOTE: The original AR applicable in the Eleventh Circuit for the
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' holding in Woodson (AR 86-19(11)),
issued May 22, 1986, was rescinded and replaced by this revised AR.
AR 90-1(9) Paxton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 856
F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1988)--Treatment of Dependent's Portion of
Augmented Veterans Benefit Paid Directly to Veteran--Title XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: July 16, 1990, at 55 FR 28946. Rescinded--See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 90-2(2) Ruppert v. Bowen, 871 F.2d 1172 (2d Cir. 1989)--
Evaluation of a Rental Subsidy as In-Kind Income for Supplemental
Security Income (SSI) Benefit Calculation Purposes--Title XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: July 16, 1990, at 55 FR 28947.
AR 90-3(4) Smith v. Bowen, 837 F.2d 635 (4th Cir. 1987)--Use of
Vocational Expert or Other Vocational Specialist in Determining Whether
a Claimant Can Perform Past Relevant Work--Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: July 16, 1990, at 55 FR 28949. Rescinded--See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 90-4(4) Culbertson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services,
859 F.2d 319 (4th Cir. 1988), Young v. Bowen, 858 F.2d 951 (4th Cir.
1988)--Waiver of Administrative Finality in Proceedings Involving
Unrepresented Claimants Who Lack the Mental Competence to Request.
Administrative Review--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: July 16, 1990, at 55 FR 28943.
AR 90-5(2) Kier v. Sullivan, 888 F.2d 244 (2d Cir. 1989), reh'g
denied, January 22, 1990--Assessment of Residual Functiona1 Capacity in
Disabled Widows' Cases--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: September 18, 1990, at 55 FR 38400. Rescinded--See
section on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 90-6(1) Cassus v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 893
F.2d 454 (lst Cir. 1990), reh'g denied, April 9, 1990--Assessment of
Residual Functional Capacity in Disabled Widows' Cases--Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Published: September 18, 1990, at 55 FR 38398. Rescinded--See
section on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 90-7(9) Ruff v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 915 (9th Cir. 1990)--
Assessment of Residual Functional Capacity in Disabled Widows' Cases--
Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: September 18, 1990, at 55 FR 38402. Rescinded--See
section on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 91-1(5) Lidy v. Sullivan, 911 F.2d 1075 (5th Cir. 1990)--Right
to Subpoena an examining Physician for Cross-examination Purposes--
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: December 31, 1991, at 56 FR 67625 as AR 91-X(5).
Correction Notice Published: May 1, 1992, at 57 FR 18899--AR number
changed to 91-1(5).
AR 92-1(3) Mazza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 903
F.2d 953 (3d Cir. 1990)--Order of Effectuation in Concurrent
Application Cases (Title II/Title XVI).
Published: January 10, 1992, at 57 FR 1190 as AR 91-X(3).
Correction Notice Published: May 1, 1992, at 57 FR 18899--AR number
changed to 92-1(3).
AR 92-2(6) Difford v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 910
F.2d 1316 (6th Cir. 1990), reh 'g denied, February 7, 1991--Scope of
Review on Appeal in a Medical Cessation of Disability Case--Title II of
the Social Security Act.
Published: March 17, 1992, at 57 FR 9262.
AR 92-3(4) Branham v. Heckler, 775 F.2d 1271 (4th Cir. 1985);
Flowers v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 904 F.2d 211
(4th Cir. 1990)--What Constitutes a Significant-Work-Related Limitation
of Function.
Published: March 10, 1992, at 57 FR 8463. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 92-4(11) Bloodsworth v. Heckler, 703 F.2d 1233 (11th Cir.
1983)--Judicial Review of an Appeals Council Dismissal of a Request for
Review of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decision.
Published: April 8, 1992, at 57 FR 11961.
AR 92-5(9) Quinlivan v. Sullivan, 916 F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1990)--
Meaning of the Term ``Against Equity and Good Conscience'' in the Rules
for Waiver of Recovery of an Overpayment--Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act; Title IV of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
of 1977.
Published: June 22, 1992, at 57 FR 27783.
AR 92-6(10) Walker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 943
F.2d 1257 (l0th Cir. 1991)--Entitlement to Trial Work Period Before
Approval of an Award for Benefits and Before Twelve Months Have Elapsed
Since Onset of Disability--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security
Act.
Published: September 17, 1992, at 57 FR 43007.
AR 92-7(9) Gonzales v. Sullivan, 914 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1990)--
Effect of Initial Determination Notice Language on the Application of
Administrative Finality-Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: September 30. 1992, at 57 FR 45061.
AR 93-1(4) Branham v. Heckler, 775 F.2d 1271 (4th Cir. 1985);
Flowers v.
[[Page 18292]]
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 904 F.2d 211 (4th Cir.
1990)--What Constitutes an Additional and Significant Work-Related
Limitation of Function--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: April 29, 1993, at 58 FR 25996.
NOTE: The original AR for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals'
holding in Branham and Flowers (AR 92-31(4)), issued March 10, 1992,
was revised to reflect a regulatory change regarding the IQ Listing
range. There were no other substantive changes to this AR. Rescinded-
See section on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 93-2(2) Conley v. Bowen, 859 F.2d 261 (2d Cir. 1988)--
Determination of Whether an Individual with a Disabling Impairment Has
Engaged in Substantial Gainful Activity Following a Reentitlement
Period--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: May 17, 1993, at 58 FR 28887. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 93-3(6) Akers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 966
F.2d 205 (6th Cir. 1992)--Attorney's Fees Based in Part on Continued
Benefits Paid to Social Security Claimants--Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Published: July 29, 1993, at 58 FR 40662. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 93-4(2) Condon and Brodner v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 (2d Cir.
1988)--Attorney's Fees Based in Part on Continued Benefits Paid to
Social Security Claimants--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: July 29, 1993, at 58 FR 40663. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 93-5(11) Shoemaker v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 858 (11th Cir. 1988)--
Attorney's Fees Based in Part on Continued Benefits Paid to Social
Security Claimants--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: July 29, 1993, at 58 FR 40665. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 93-6(8) Brewster on Behalf of Keller v. Sullivan, 972 F.2d 898
(8th Cir. 1992)--Interpretation of the Secretary's Regulation Regarding
Presumption of Death--Title II of the Social Security Act
Published: August 16, 1993, at 58 FR 43369. Rescinded-See section
on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 94-1(10) Wolfe v. Sullivan, 988 F.2d 1025 (10th Cir. 1993)--
Contributions to Support re: Posthumous Illegitimate Child--Title II of
the Social Security Act.
Published: June 27, 1994, at 59 FR 33003.
AR 94-2(4) Lively v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 820
F.2d 1391 (4th Cir. 1987)--Effect of Prior Disability Findings on
Adjudication of a Subsequent Disability Claim Arising Under the Same
Title of the Social Security Act--Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Published: July 7, 1994, at 59 FR 34849. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 95-1(6) Preslar v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 14
F.3d 1107 (6th Cir. 1994)-- Definition of Highly Marketable Skills for
Individuals Close to Retirement Age--Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Published: May 4, 1995, at 60 FR 22091. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 95-2(9) Hodge v. Shalala. 27 F.3d 430 (9th Cir. 1994)--Workers'
Compensation--Proration of a Lump-Sum Award for Permanent Disability
Over the Remainder of an Individual's Working Life Under Oregon
Workers' Compensation Law--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: July 12, 1995, at 60 FR 35987.
AR 96-1(6) DeSonier v. Sullivan, 906 F.2d 228 (6th Cir. 1990)--
Method of Application of State Intestate Succession Law in Determining
Entitlement to Child's Benefits--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: June 3, 1996, at 61 FR 27942.
AR 97-1(1) Parisi By Cooney v. Chater, 69 F.3d 614 (1st Cir.
1995)--Reduction of Benefits Under the Family Maximum in Cases
Involving Dual Entitlement--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: January 13, 1997, at 62 FR 1792. Rescinded-See section
on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 97-2(9) Gamble v. Chater, 68 F.3d 319 (9th Cir. 1995)--
Amputation of a Lower Extremity--When the Inability to Afford the Cost
of a Prosthesis Meets the Requirements of Section 1.10C of the Listing
of Impairments--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: January 13, 1997, at 62 FR 1791. Rescinded-See section
on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 97-3(11) Daniels on Behalf of Daniels v. Sullivan, 979 F.2d 1516
(11th Cir. 1992)--Application of a State's Intestacy Law Requirement
that Paternity be Established During the Lifetime of the Father--Title
II of the Social Security Act.
Published: August 4, 1997, at 62 FR 41989.
AR 97-4(9) Chavez v. Bowen, 844 F.2d 691 (9th Cir. 1988)--Effect of
a Prior Final Decision That a Claimant is Not Disabled, And of Findings
Contained Therein, On Adjudication of a Subsequent Disability Claim
Arising Under the Same Title of the Social Security Act--Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: December 3, 1997, at 62 FR 64038.
AR 98-1(8) Newton v. Chater, 92 F.3d 688 (8th Cir. 1996)--
Entitlement to Trial Work Period Before Approval of an Award for
Benefits and Before Twelve Months Have Elapsed Since Onset of
Disability--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: February 23, 1998, at 63 FR 9037. Rescinded-See section
on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 98-2(8) Sird v. Chater, 105 F.3d 401 (8th Cir. 1997)--Mental
Retardation--What Constitutes an Additional and Significant Work-
Related Limitation of Function--Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Published: February 24, 1998, at 63 FR 9279. Rescinded-See section
on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 98-3(6) Dennard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 907
F.2d 598 (6th Cir. 1990)--Effect of a Prior Finding of the Demands of
Past Work on Adjudication of a Subsequent Disability Claim Arising
Under the Same Title of the Social Security Act--Titles II and XVI of
the Social Security Act.
Published: June 1, 1998. at 63 FR 29770.
AR 98-4(6) Drummond v. Commissioner of Social Security, 126 F.3d
1337 (6th Cir. 1997)--Effect of Prior Findings on Adjudication of a
Subsequent Disability Claim Arising Under the Same Title of the Social
Security Act--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: June 1, 1998, at 63 FR 29771.
AR 98-5(8) State of Minnesota v. Apfel, 151 F.3d 742 (8th Cir.
1998)--Coverage for Employees Under a Federal-State Section 218
Agreement or Modification and Application of the Student Services
Exclusion From Coverage to Services Performed by Medical Residents--
Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: October 30, 1998, at 63 FR 58444.
AR 99-1(2) Florez on Behalf of Wallace v. Callahan, 156 F.3d 438
(2d Cir. 1998)-- Supplemental Security Income--Deeming of Income From a
Stepparent to a Child When the Natural Parent is Not Living In the Same
Household--Title XVI of the Social Security Act.
[[Page 18293]]
Published: February 1, 1999, at 64 FR 4923. Rescinded-See section
on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 99-2(8) Kerns v. Apfel, 160 F.3d 464 (8th Cir. 1998)--Definition
of Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals Close to Retirement Age--
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: March 11, 1999, at 64 FR 12205. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 99-3(5) McQueen v. Apfel, 168 F.3d 152 (5th Cir. 1999)--
Definition of Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals Close to
Retirement Age--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: May 27, 1999, at 64 FR 28853. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 99-4(11) Bloodsworth v. Heckler, 703 F.2d 1233 (11th Cir.
1983)--Judicial Review of an Appeals Council Dismissal of a Request for
Review of an Administrative Law Judge Decision--Titles II and XVI of
the Social Security Act.
Published: October 26, 1999, at 64 FR 57687.
NOTE: The original AR for the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals'
holding in Bloodsworth (AR 92-4(11)), issued April 8, 1992, was revised
to delete a parenthetical statement and to update the AR's language.
These revisions were technical corrections only and did not involve any
substantive changes.
AR 00-1(4) Albright v. Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration, 174 F.3d 473 (4th Cir. 1999)--Effect of Prior
Disability Findings on Adjudication of a Subsequent Disability Claim--
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: January 12, 2000, at 65 FR 1936.
AR 00-2(7) Hickman v. Apfel. 187 F.3d 683 (7th Cir. 1999)--
Evidentiary Requirements for Determining Medical Equivalence to a
Listed Impairment--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: May 3, 2000, at 65 FR 25783. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 00-3(10) Haddock v. Apfel, 196 F.3d 1084 (l0th Cir. 1999)--Use
of Vocational Expert Testimony and the Dictionary of Occupational
Titles Under 20 CFR 404.1566, 416.966--Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Published: June 20, 2000, at 65 FR 38312. Rescinded-See section on
Rescissions in this notice.
AR 00-4(2) Curry v. Apfel, 209 F.3d 117 (2d Cir. 2000)--Burden of
Proving Residual Functional Capacity at Step Five of the Sequential
Evaluation Process for Determining Disability--Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Published: September 11, 2000, at 65 FR 54879. Rescinded-See
section on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 00-5(6) Salamalekis v. Apfel, 221 F.3d 828 (6th Cir. 2000)--
Entitlement to Trial Work Period Before Approval of an Award of
Benefits and Before 12 Months Have Elapsed Since the Alleged Onset of
Disability--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: November 15, 2000, at 65 FR 69116. Rescinded-See section
on Rescissions in this notice.
AR 01-1(3) Sykes v. Apfel, 228 F.3d 259 (3d Cir. 2000)--Using the
Grid Rules as a Framework for Decisionmaking When an Individual's
Occupational Base is Eroded by a Nonexertional Limitation--Titles II
and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Published: January 25, 2001, at 66 FR 7829.
AR 03-1(7) Blakes v. Barnhart, 331 F.3d 565 (7th Cir. 2003)--Cases
Involving Sections 12.05 and 112.05 of the Listing of Impairments That
Are Remanded By a Court for Further Proceedings Under Titles II and XVI
of the Social Security Act.
Published: December 23, 2003, at 613 FR 74279.
AR 04-1(9) Howard on behalf of Wolff v. Barnhart, 341 F.3d 1006
(9th Cir. 2003)--Applicability of the Statutory Requirement for
Pediatrician Review in Childhood Disability Cases to the Hearings and
Appeals Levels of the Administrative Review Process Under Title XVI of
the Social Security Act.
Published: April 26, 2004, at 69 FR 22578.
AR 05-1(9) Gillett-Netting v. Barnhart, 371 F.3d 593 (9th Cir.
2004), reh'g denied, December 14, 2004 --Applicability of State Law and
the Social Security Act in Determining Whether a Child Conceived by
Artificial Means after an Insured Person's Death is Eligible for
Child's Insurance Benefits--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Published: September 22, 2005, at 70 FR 55656.
AR 06-1(2) Fowlkes v. Adamec, 432 F.3d 90 (2d Cir. 2005)--
Determining Whether an Individual is a Fugitive Felon Under the Social
Security Act (Act)--Titles II and XVI of the Act.
Published: April 6, 2000, at 71 FR 17551.
RESCISSIONS WITHOUT REPLACEMENT ARs
AR 86-1(9) Summy v. Schweiker, 688 F.2d 1233 (9th Cir. 1982)--Third
party payments for medical care or services--Title XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 5, 1994, at 59 FR 34444.
AR 86-6(3) Aubrey v. Richardson, 462 F.2d 782 (3d Cir. 1972);
Shelnutt v. Heckler, 723 F.2d 1131 (3d Cir. 1983)--Interpretation of
the Secretary's Regulation Regarding Presumption of Death--Title II of
the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86-7(5) Autrey v. Harris, 639 F.2d 1233 (5th Cir. 1981); Wages
v. Schweiker, 659 F.2d 59 (5th Cir. 1981)--Interpretation of the
Secretary's Regulation Regarding Presumption of Death--Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86-8(6) Johnson v. Califano, 607 F.2d 1178 (6th Cir. 1979)--
Interpretation of the Secretary's Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86-9(9) Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Meza, 386
F.2d 389 (9th Cir. 1966); Gardner v. Wilcox, 370 F.2d 492 (9th Cir.
1966)--Interpretation of the Secretary's Regulation Regarding
Presumption of Death--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86-10(10) Edwards v. Califano, 619 F.2d 865 (10th Cir. 1980)--
Interpretation of the Secretary's Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86-11(11) Autrey v. Harris, 639 F.2d 1233 (5th Cir. 1981)--
Interpretation of the Secretary's Regulation Regarding Presumption of
Death--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 86-17(9) Owens v. Schweiker, 692 F.2d 80 (9th Cir. 1982)--
Child's Benefits--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: October 28, 1998, at 63 FR 57727.
AR 87-1(6) Webb v. Richardson, 472 F.2d 529 (6th Cir. 1972)--
Attorneys' Fees--Single Fee, Not to Exceed 25 Percent of Past-Due
Benefits, Set by Tribunal Which Ultimately Upholds the Claim--Title II
of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: March 3, 1995, at 60 FR 11977.
AR 87-2(11) Butterworth v. Bowen, 796 F.2d 1379 (11th Cir. 1986)--
The
[[Page 18294]]
Conditions under Which the Appeals Council has the Right to Reopen and
Revise Prior Decisions--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 7, 1998, at 63 FR 36726.
AR 87-3(9) Hart v. Bowen, 799 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1986)--Current
Market Value of an Installment Sales Contract as an Excess Resource.
Notice of Rescission Published: February 9, 1995, at 60 FR 7782.
AR 87-4(8) Iamarino v. Heckler, 795 F.2d 59 (8th Cir. 1986)--
Positive Presumption of Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA) for
Sheltered Work.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 11, 2000, at 65 FR 42793.
AR 87-5(3) Velazquez v. Heckler, 802 F.2d 680 (3d Cir. 1986)--
Consideration of Vocational Factors in Past Work Determination.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 16, 1990, at 55 FR 28943.
AR 88-1(11) Patterson v. Bowen, 799 F.2d 1455 (11th Cir. 1986),
reh'g denied, February 12, 1987--Use of the Age Factor in the Medical-
Vocational Guidelines in Making Disability Decisions.
Notice of Rescission Published: April 6, 2000, at 65 FR 18143.
AR 88-3(7) McDonald v. Bowen, 800 F.2d 153 (7th Cir. 1986), amended
on reh'g, 818 F.2d 559 (7th Cir. 1987)--Entitlement to Benefits Where a
Person Returns to Work Less Than 12 Months After Onset of Disability.
Notice of Rescission Published: June 10, 2002, at 67 FR 39781.
AR 88-5(1) McCuin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 817
F.2d 161 (1st Cir. 1987)--Reopening by the Appeals Council of Decisions
of Administrative Law Judges under Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: February 23, 1994, at 59 FR 8650.
AR 88-7(5) Hickman v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 1377 (5th Cir. 1986)--
Evaluation of Loans of In-Kind Support and Maintenance for Supplemental
Security Income Benefit Calculation Purposes.
Notice of Rescission Published: September 8, 1992, at 57 FR 40918.
AR 90-1(9) Paxton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 856 F
.2d 1352 (9th Cir.1988)--Treatment of Dependent's Portion of Augmented
Veterans Benefit Paid Directly to Veteran--Title XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: November 17, 1994, at 59 FR 59416.
AR 90-3(4) Smith v. Bowen, 837 F.2d 635 (4th Cir. 1987)--Use of
Vocational Expert or Other Vocational Specialist in Determining Whether
a Claimant Can Perform Past Relevant Work--Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: August 26, 2003, at 68 FR 51317.
AR 90-5(2) Kier v. Sullivan, 888 F.2d 244 (2d Cir. 1989), reh'g
denied, January 22, 1990--Assessment of Residual Functional Capacity in
Disabled Widows' Cases--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: May 22, 1991, at 56 FR 23592.
AR 90-6(1) Cassas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 393
F.2d 454 (1st Cir. 1990), reh'g denied, April 9, 1990--Assessment of
Residual Functional Capacity in Disabled Widows' Cases--Title II of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: May 22, 1991, at 56 FR 23591.
AR 90-7(9) Ruff v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 915 (9th Cir. 1990)--
Assessment of Residual Functional Capacity in Disabled Widows' Cases--
Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: May 22, 1991, at 56 FR 23592.
AR 92-3(4) Branham v. Heckler, 775 F.2d 1271 (4th Cir. 1985);
Flowers v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 904 F.2d 211
(4th Cir. 1990)--What Constitutes a Significant Work-Related Limitation
of Function.
Notice of Rescission Published: August 21, 2000, at 65 FR 50784.
AR 92-6(10) Walker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 943
F.2d 1257 (10th Cir. 1991)--Entitlement to Trial Work Period Before
Approval of an Award for Benefits and Before Twelve Months Have Elapsed
Since Onset of Disability-Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: June 10, 2002, at 67 FR 39871.
AR 93-1(4) Branham v. Heckler, 775 F.2d 1271 (4th Cir. 1985);
Flowers v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 904 F.2d 211
(4th Cir. 1990)--What Constitutes an Additional and Significant Work-
Related Limitation of Function--Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: August 21, 2000, at 65 FR 50784.
AR. 93-2(2) Conley v. Bowen, 859 F.2d 261 (3d Cir. 1988)--
Determination of Whether an Individual With a Disabling Impairment Has
Engaged in Substantial Gainful Activity Following a Reentitlement
Period--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: August 10, 2000, at 65 FR 42793.
AR 93-3(6) Akers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 966
F.2d 205 (6th Cir. 1992)--Attorney's Fees Based in Part on Continued
Benefits Paid to Social Security Claimants--Title II of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April 14, 2000, at 65 FR 20239.
AR 93-4(2) Condon and Brodner v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 66 (2d Cir.
1988)--Attorney's Fees Based in Part on Continued Benefits Paid to
Social Security Claimants--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April 14, 2000, at 65 FR 20239.
AR 93-5(11) Shoemaker v. Bowen, 853 F.2d 858 (11th Cir. 1988)--
Attorney's Fees Based in Part on Continued Benefits Paid to Social
Security Claimants--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April 14, 2000, at 65 FR 20239.
AR 93-6(8) Brewster on Behalf of Keller v. Sullivan, 972 F.2d 898
(8th Cir. 1992)--Interpretation of the Secretary's Regulation Regarding
Presumption of Death--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: July 14, 1995, at 60 FR 36327.
AR 94-2(4) Lively v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 820
F.2d 1391 (4th Cir. 1987)--Effect of Prior Disability Findings on
Adjudication of a Subsequent Disability Claim Arising Under the Same
Title of the Social Security Act--Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: January 12, 2000, at 65 FR 1936.
AR 95-1(6) Preslar v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 14
F.3d 1107 (6th Cir. 1994)--Definition of Highly Marketable Skills for
Individuals Close to Retirement Age--Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April 6, 2000, at 65 FR 18144.
AR 97-1(1) Parisi By Cooney v. Chater, 69 F.3d 814 (1st Cir.
1995)--Reduction of Benefits Under the Family Maximum In Cases
Involving Dual Entitlement--Title II of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: October 27, 1999, at 64 FR 57919.
AR 97-2(9) Gamble v. Chater, 68 F.3d 319 (9th Cir. 1995)--
Amputation of a Lower Extremity--When the Inability to Afford the Cost
of a Prosthesis Meets the Requirements of Section 1.10C of the Listing
of Impairments--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: November 19, 2001, at 66 FR 58047.
AR 98-1(8) Newton v. Chater, 92 F.3d 688 (8th Cir. 1996)--
Entitlement to Trial Work Period Before Approval of an Award for
Benefits and Before Twelve Months Have Elapsed Since Onset of
Disability--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: June 10, 2002, at 67 FR 39781.
[[Page 18295]]
AR 98-2(8) Sird v. Chater, 105 F.3d 401 (8th Cir. 1997)--Mental
Retardation--What Constitutes an Additional and Significant Work-
Related Limitation of Function--Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: August 21, 2000, at 65 FR 50784.
AR 99-1(2) Florez on Behalf of Wallace v. Callahan, 156 F.3d 438
(2d Cir. 1998)-- Supplemental Security Income--Deeming of Income From a
Stepparent to a Child When the Natural Parent is Not Living in the Same
Household--Title XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: May 15, 2008, at 73 FR 28181.
AR 99-2(8) Kerns v. Apfel, 160 F.3d 164 (8th Cir. 1998)--Definition
of Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals Close to Retirement Age--
Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April 6, 2000, at 65 FR 18144.
AR 99-3(5) McQueen v. Apfel, 168 F.3d 152 (5th Cir, 1999)--
Definition of Highly Marketable Skills for Individuals Close to
Retirement Age--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: April 6, 2000, at 65 FR 18144.
AR 00-2(7) Hickman v. Apfel, 187 F.3d 683 (7th Cir. 1999)--
Evidentiary Requirements for Determining Medical Equivalence to a
Listed Impairment--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: March 1, 2006, at 71 FR 10584.
AR 00-3(10) Haddock v. Apfel, 196 F.3d 1084 (10th Cir, 1999)--Use
of Vocational Expert Testimony and the Dictionary of Occupational
Titles Under 20 CFR 404.1566, 416.966--Titles II and XVI of the Social
Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: December 4, 2000, at 65 FR 75758.
AR 00-4(2) Curry v. Apfel, 209 F.3d 117 (2d Cir. 2000)--Burden of
Proving Residual Functional Capacity at Step Five of the Sequential
Evaluation Process for Determining Disability--Titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: August 26, 2003, at 68 FR 51317.
AR 00-5(6) Salamalekis v. Apfel, 221 F.3d 828 (6th Cir. 2000)--
Entitlement to Trial Work Period Before Approval of an Award of
Benefits and Before 12 Months Have Elapsed Since the Alleged Onset of
Disability--Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
Notice of Rescission Published: June 10, 2002, at 67 FR 39781.
Dated: March 20, 2012.
LaTina Burse Greene,
Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Retirement and Disability Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-7182 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
