Special Conditions: Airbus, A350-900 Series Airplane; Passenger Seats With Non-Traditional, Large, Non-Metallic Panels, 17325-17327 [2012-7235]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
increase steadily, but not necessarily in
constant proportion, as the angle of
sideslip is increased up to the maximum
appropriate to the type of airplane. The
aileron control movements and forces
may increase steadily, but not
necessarily in constant proportion, as
the angle of sideslip is increased up to
the maximum appropriate to the type of
airplane. At larger slip angles, up to the
angle at which the full rudder or aileron
control is used or a control force limit
contained in section 23.143 is reached,
the aileron and rudder control
movements and forces must not reverse
as the angle of sideslip is increased.
Rapid entry into, and recovery from, a
maximum sideslip considered
appropriate for the airplane must not
result in uncontrollable flight
characteristics.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March
1, 2012.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–6837 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0325; Notice No. 25–
459–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus, A350–900
Series Airplane; Passenger Seats With
Non-Traditional, Large, Non-Metallic
Panels
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions, request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Airbus A350–900 series
airplane. These airplanes will have a
novel or unusual design feature(s)
associated with seats that include nontraditional, large, non-metallic panels
that would affect survivability during a
post-crash fire event. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is March 14, 2012.
We must receive your comments by May
10, 2012.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Mar 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Send comments identified
by docket number [FAA–2012–0325]
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or of Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC between 8
a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at
https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room @W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Gardlin, FAA, Airframe/Cabin Safety,
ANM–115, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington, 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–2136; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17325
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied
for a type certificate for their new A350–
900 series airplane. Later, Airbus
requested and the FAA approved an
extension to the application for FAA
type certification to June 28, 2009. The
A350–900 series has a conventional
layout with twin wing-mounted Rolls
Royce Trent engines. It features a twin
aisle 9-abreast economy class layout,
and accommodates side-by-side
placement of LD–3 containers in the
cargo compartment. The basic A350–
900 series configuration accommodates
315 passengers in a standard two-class
arrangement. The design cruise speed is
Mach 0.85 with a Maximum Take-Off
Weight of 591,000 lbs. Airbus proposes
the A350–900 series to be certified for
extended operations (ETOPS) beyond
180 minutes at entry into service for up
to a 420-minute maximum diversion
time.
The applicable airplane regulations,
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 25, do not require seats to
meet the more-stringent flammability
standards required of large, non-metallic
panels in the cabin interior. At the time
the applicable rules were written, seats
were designed with a metal frame
covered by fabric, not with large, nonmetallic panels. Seats also met the thenrecently adopted standards for
flammability of seat cushions. With the
seat design being mostly fabric and
metal, the contribution to a fire in the
cabin had been minimized and was not
considered a threat. For these reasons,
seats did not need to be tested to heatrelease and smoke-emission
requirements.
Seat designs have now evolved to
occasionally include non-traditional,
large, non-metallic panels. Taken in
total, the surface area of these panels is
on the same order as the sidewall and
overhead stowage bin interior panels.
To provide the level of passenger
protection intended by the
airworthiness standards, these nontraditional, large, non-metallic panels in
the cabin must meet the standards of
part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V,
heat-release and smoke-emission
requirements.
Type Certification Basis
Under Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus must
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
17326
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
show that the A350–900 series meets
the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part
25, as amended by Amendments 25–1
through 25–128.
The FAA has determined that Airbus
A350–900 series airplanes must comply
with the following sections: § 25.853(a)
and § 25.853(c), and Amendment 25–61
and Amendment 25–66.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the A350–900 series because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under § 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model or series for
which they are issued. Should the type
certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would also apply to the other
model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the A350–900 series must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34, the noise certification requirements
of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must
issue a finding of regulatory adequacy
under § 611 of Public Law 92–574, the
‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38, and
they become part of the typecertification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The A350–900 series will incorporate
the following novel or unusual design
features: Passenger seats that
incorporate non-traditional, large, nonmetallic panels in lieu of the traditional
metal frame covered by fabric. The
flammability properties of these panels
have been shown to significantly affect
the survivability of occupants of the
cabin in the case of fire. These seats are
considered a novel design for transport
category airplanes that include
Amendment 25–61 and Amendment
25–66 in the certification basis, and
were not considered when those
airworthiness standards were
established.
The existing regulations do not
provide adequate or appropriate safety
standards for seat designs that
incorporate non-traditional, large, nonmetallic panels. In order to provide a
level of safety that is equivalent to that
provided by the balance of the cabin,
additional airworthiness standards, in
the form of special conditions, are
necessary. These special conditions
supplement § 25.853. The requirements
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Mar 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
contained in these special conditions
consist of applying the identical test
conditions required of all other large
panels in the cabin, to seats with nontraditional, large, non-metallic panels.
Definition of ‘‘Non-Traditional, Large,
Non-Metallic Panel’’
A non-traditional, large, non-metallic
panel, in this case, is defined as a panel
with exposed-surface areas greater than
1.5 square feet installed per seat place.
The panel may consist of either a single
component or multiple components in a
concentrated area. Examples of parts of
the seat where these non-traditional
panels are installed include, but are not
limited to: Seat backs, bottoms and leg/
foot rests, kick panels, back shells,
credenzas and associated furniture.
Examples of traditional exempted parts
of the seat include: Arm caps, armrest
close-outs such as end bays and armreststyled center consoles, food trays, video
monitors and shrouds.
Clarification of ‘‘Exposed’’
‘‘Exposed’’ includes those panels
directly exposed to the passenger cabin
in the traditional sense, plus those
panels enveloped such as by a dress
cover. Traditional fabrics or leathers
currently used on seats are excluded
from these special conditions. These
materials must still comply with
§ 25.853(a) and § 25.853(c) if used as a
covering for a seat cushion, or
§ 25.853(a) if installed elsewhere on the
seat. Non-traditional, large, non-metallic
panels covered with traditional fabrics
or leathers will be tested without their
coverings or covering attachments.
Discussion
In the early 1980s the FAA conducted
extensive research on the effects of postcrash flammability in the passenger
cabin. As a result of this research and
service experience, the FAA adopted
new standards for interior surfaces
associated with large surface area parts.
Specifically, the rules require
measurement of heat release and smoke
emission (part 25, Appendix F, parts IV
and V) for the affected parts. Heat
release has been shown to have a direct
correlation with post- crash fire survival
time. Materials that comply with the
standards (i.e., Sec. 25.853 entitled
‘‘Compartment interiors’’ as amended by
Amendment 25–61 and Amendment
25–66) extend survival time by
approximately 2 minutes over materials
that do not comply.
At the time these standards were
written the potential application of the
requirements of heat release and smoke
emission to seats was explored. The seat
frame itself was not a concern because
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
it was primarily made of aluminum and
there were only small amounts of nonmetallic materials. It was determined
that the overall effect on survivability
was negligible, whether or not the food
trays met the heat release and smoke
requirements. The requirements
therefore did not address seats. The
preambles to both the Notice of
Proposed Rule Making (NPRM), Notice
No. 85–10 (50 FR 15038, April 16, 1985)
and the Final Rule at Amendment 25–
61 (51 FR 26206, July 21, 1986),
specifically note that seats were
excluded ‘‘because the recently-adopted
standards for flammability of seat
cushions will greatly inhibit
involvement of the seats.’’
Subsequently, the Final Rule at
Amendment 25–83 (60 FR 6615, March
6, 1995) clarified the definition of
minimum panel size: ‘‘It is not possible
to cite a specific size that will apply in
all installations; however, as a general
rule, components with exposed-surface
areas of one square foot or less may be
considered small enough that they do
not have to meet the new standards.
Components with exposed-surface areas
greater than two square feet may be
considered large enough that they do
have to meet the new standards. Those
with exposed-surface areas greater than
one square foot, but less than two square
feet, must be considered in conjunction
with the areas of the cabin in which
they are installed before a determination
could be made.’’
In the late 1990s, the FAA issued
Policy Memorandum 97–112–39,
Guidance for Flammability Testing of
Seat/Console Installations, October 17,
1997 (https://rgl.faa.gov). That memo
was issued when it became clear that
seat designs were evolving to include
large, non-metallic panels with surface
areas that would impact survivability
during a cabin fire event, comparable to
partitions or galleys. The memo noted
that large surface area panels must
comply with heat release and smoke
emission requirements, even if they
were attached to a seat. If the FAA had
not issued such policy, seat designs
could have been viewed as a loophole
to the airworthiness standards that
would result in an unacceptable
decrease in survivability during a cabin
fire event.
In October of 2004, an issue was
raised regarding the appropriate
flammability standards for passenger
seats that incorporated non-traditional,
large, non-metallic panels in lieu of the
traditional metal covered by fabric. The
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office and
Transport Standards Staff reviewed this
design and determined that it
represented the kind and quantity of
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
material that should be required to pass
the heat release and smoke emissions
requirements. We have determined that
special conditions would be
promulgated to apply the standards
defined in 14 CFR 25.853(d) to seats
with large, non-metallic panels in their
design.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
14, 2012.
John Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions apply to Airbus A350–900
series airplanes. Should Airbus apply
later for a change to the type certificate
to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design
feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on Airbus
A350–900 series airplanes. It is not a
rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
■ The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Jkt 226001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–1087; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–032–AD; Amendment
39–16967; AD 2012–04–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Correction
In rule document 2012–5859
appearing on pages 14679–14681 in the
issue of March 13, 2012, make the
following correction:
[Corrected]
On page 14680, in § 39.13, in the third
column, the table is corrected to read as
set forth below:
■
The Special Conditions
So, by the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the following
special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Airbus
A350–900 series airplanes with
passenger seats that have nontraditional, large, non-metallic panels.
1. Compliance with 14 CFR part 25
Appendix F, parts IV and V, heat release
and smoke emission, is required for
seats that incorporate non-traditional,
large nonmetallic panels that may either
be a single component or multiple
components in a concentrated area in
their design.
2. The applicant may designate up to
and including 1.5 square feet of nontraditional, nonmetallic panel material
per seat place that does not have to
comply with No. 1. A triple seat
assembly may have a total of 4.5 square
feet excluded on any portion of the
assembly (e.g., outboard seat place 1 sq.
ft., middle 1 sq. ft., and inboard 2.5 sq.
ft.).
3. Seats need not meet the test
requirements of 14 CFR part 25
Appendix F, parts IV and V when
installed in compartments that are not
otherwise required to meet these
requirements. Examples include:
a. Airplanes with passenger capacities
of 19 or less,
b. Airplanes exempted from smoke
and heat release requirements.
16:21 Mar 23, 2012
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
§ 39.13
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
[FR Doc. 2012–7235 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
TABLE 1—LIST OF FWC PART
NUMBERS AFFECTED BY THIS AD
FWC Part Number
350E017238484 (H1D1)
350E016187171 (C5)
350E017248685 (H1D2)
350E017251414 (H1E1)
350E017271616 (H1E2)
350E018291818 (H1E3CJ)
350E018301919 (H1E3P)
350E018312020 (H1E3Q)
350E053020202 (H2E2)
350E053020303 (H2E3)
350E053020404 (H2E4)
350E053020606 (H2F2)
350E053020707 (H2F3)
350E053021010 (H2F3P)
350E053020808 (H2F4)
[FR Doc. C1–2012–5859 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0499; Airspace
Docket No. 11–ACE–10]
Amendment of Class E Airspace;
Hastings, NE
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
17327
Final rule.
This action amends Class E
airspace at Hastings, NE. Additional
controlled airspace is necessary to
accommodate new Area Navigation
(RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures at Hastings Municipal
Airport. The FAA is taking this action
to enhance the safety and management
of Instrument Flight Rule (IFR)
operations at the airport.
DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, May
31, 2012. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321–
7716.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
History
On November 28, 2011, the FAA
published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to amend Class E airspace for the
Hastings, NE., area, creating additional
controlled airspace at Hastings
Municipal Airport (76 FR 72867) Docket
No. FAA–2011–0499. Interested parties
were invited to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received. Class E
airspace designations are published in
paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9V
dated August 9, 2011, and effective
September 15, 2011, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
Part 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the
Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by
amending Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
to accommodate new RNAV standard
instrument approach procedures at
Hastings Municipal Airport, Hastings,
NE. This action is necessary for the
safety and management of IFR
operations at the airport.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17325-17327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7235]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0325; Notice No. 25-459-SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus, A350-900 Series Airplane; Passenger
Seats With Non-Traditional, Large, Non-Metallic Panels
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Airbus A350-900
series airplane. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual design
feature(s) associated with seats that include non-traditional, large,
non-metallic panels that would affect survivability during a post-crash
fire event. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These
special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is March 14,
2012. We must receive your comments by May 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number [FAA-2012-0325]
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or of Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC between 8 a.m., and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room @W12-
140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Gardlin, FAA, Airframe/Cabin
Safety, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington, 98057-3356;
telephone (425) 227-2136; facsimile (425) 227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring expense or delay. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we receive.
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied for a type certificate for their
new A350-900 series airplane. Later, Airbus requested and the FAA
approved an extension to the application for FAA type certification to
June 28, 2009. The A350-900 series has a conventional layout with twin
wing-mounted Rolls Royce Trent engines. It features a twin aisle 9-
abreast economy class layout, and accommodates side-by-side placement
of LD-3 containers in the cargo compartment. The basic A350-900 series
configuration accommodates 315 passengers in a standard two-class
arrangement. The design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with a Maximum Take-
Off Weight of 591,000 lbs. Airbus proposes the A350-900 series to be
certified for extended operations (ETOPS) beyond 180 minutes at entry
into service for up to a 420-minute maximum diversion time.
The applicable airplane regulations, Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 25, do not require seats to meet the more-
stringent flammability standards required of large, non-metallic panels
in the cabin interior. At the time the applicable rules were written,
seats were designed with a metal frame covered by fabric, not with
large, non-metallic panels. Seats also met the then-recently adopted
standards for flammability of seat cushions. With the seat design being
mostly fabric and metal, the contribution to a fire in the cabin had
been minimized and was not considered a threat. For these reasons,
seats did not need to be tested to heat-release and smoke-emission
requirements.
Seat designs have now evolved to occasionally include non-
traditional, large, non-metallic panels. Taken in total, the surface
area of these panels is on the same order as the sidewall and overhead
stowage bin interior panels. To provide the level of passenger
protection intended by the airworthiness standards, these non-
traditional, large, non-metallic panels in the cabin must meet the
standards of part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V, heat-release and
smoke-emission requirements.
Type Certification Basis
Under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus
must
[[Page 17326]]
show that the A350-900 series meets the applicable provisions of 14 CFR
part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-128.
The FAA has determined that Airbus A350-900 series airplanes must
comply with the following sections: Sec. 25.853(a) and Sec.
25.853(c), and Amendment 25-61 and Amendment 25-66.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the A350-900 series because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under
Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model or series
for which they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model
be amended later to include any other model that incorporates the same
or similar novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the A350-900 series must comply with the fuel vent and
exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis under
Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The A350-900 series will incorporate the following novel or unusual
design features: Passenger seats that incorporate non-traditional,
large, non-metallic panels in lieu of the traditional metal frame
covered by fabric. The flammability properties of these panels have
been shown to significantly affect the survivability of occupants of
the cabin in the case of fire. These seats are considered a novel
design for transport category airplanes that include Amendment 25-61
and Amendment 25-66 in the certification basis, and were not considered
when those airworthiness standards were established.
The existing regulations do not provide adequate or appropriate
safety standards for seat designs that incorporate non-traditional,
large, non-metallic panels. In order to provide a level of safety that
is equivalent to that provided by the balance of the cabin, additional
airworthiness standards, in the form of special conditions, are
necessary. These special conditions supplement Sec. 25.853. The
requirements contained in these special conditions consist of applying
the identical test conditions required of all other large panels in the
cabin, to seats with non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels.
Definition of ``Non-Traditional, Large, Non-Metallic Panel''
A non-traditional, large, non-metallic panel, in this case, is
defined as a panel with exposed-surface areas greater than 1.5 square
feet installed per seat place. The panel may consist of either a single
component or multiple components in a concentrated area. Examples of
parts of the seat where these non-traditional panels are installed
include, but are not limited to: Seat backs, bottoms and leg/foot
rests, kick panels, back shells, credenzas and associated furniture.
Examples of traditional exempted parts of the seat include: Arm caps,
armrest close-outs such as end bays and armrest-styled center consoles,
food trays, video monitors and shrouds.
Clarification of ``Exposed''
``Exposed'' includes those panels directly exposed to the passenger
cabin in the traditional sense, plus those panels enveloped such as by
a dress cover. Traditional fabrics or leathers currently used on seats
are excluded from these special conditions. These materials must still
comply with Sec. 25.853(a) and Sec. 25.853(c) if used as a covering
for a seat cushion, or Sec. 25.853(a) if installed elsewhere on the
seat. Non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels covered with
traditional fabrics or leathers will be tested without their coverings
or covering attachments.
Discussion
In the early 1980s the FAA conducted extensive research on the
effects of post-crash flammability in the passenger cabin. As a result
of this research and service experience, the FAA adopted new standards
for interior surfaces associated with large surface area parts.
Specifically, the rules require measurement of heat release and smoke
emission (part 25, Appendix F, parts IV and V) for the affected parts.
Heat release has been shown to have a direct correlation with post-
crash fire survival time. Materials that comply with the standards
(i.e., Sec. 25.853 entitled ``Compartment interiors'' as amended by
Amendment 25-61 and Amendment 25-66) extend survival time by
approximately 2 minutes over materials that do not comply.
At the time these standards were written the potential application
of the requirements of heat release and smoke emission to seats was
explored. The seat frame itself was not a concern because it was
primarily made of aluminum and there were only small amounts of non-
metallic materials. It was determined that the overall effect on
survivability was negligible, whether or not the food trays met the
heat release and smoke requirements. The requirements therefore did not
address seats. The preambles to both the Notice of Proposed Rule Making
(NPRM), Notice No. 85-10 (50 FR 15038, April 16, 1985) and the Final
Rule at Amendment 25-61 (51 FR 26206, July 21, 1986), specifically note
that seats were excluded ``because the recently-adopted standards for
flammability of seat cushions will greatly inhibit involvement of the
seats.''
Subsequently, the Final Rule at Amendment 25-83 (60 FR 6615, March
6, 1995) clarified the definition of minimum panel size: ``It is not
possible to cite a specific size that will apply in all installations;
however, as a general rule, components with exposed-surface areas of
one square foot or less may be considered small enough that they do not
have to meet the new standards. Components with exposed-surface areas
greater than two square feet may be considered large enough that they
do have to meet the new standards. Those with exposed-surface areas
greater than one square foot, but less than two square feet, must be
considered in conjunction with the areas of the cabin in which they are
installed before a determination could be made.''
In the late 1990s, the FAA issued Policy Memorandum 97-112-39,
Guidance for Flammability Testing of Seat/Console Installations,
October 17, 1997 (https://rgl.faa.gov). That memo was issued when it
became clear that seat designs were evolving to include large, non-
metallic panels with surface areas that would impact survivability
during a cabin fire event, comparable to partitions or galleys. The
memo noted that large surface area panels must comply with heat release
and smoke emission requirements, even if they were attached to a seat.
If the FAA had not issued such policy, seat designs could have been
viewed as a loophole to the airworthiness standards that would result
in an unacceptable decrease in survivability during a cabin fire event.
In October of 2004, an issue was raised regarding the appropriate
flammability standards for passenger seats that incorporated non-
traditional, large, non-metallic panels in lieu of the traditional
metal covered by fabric. The Seattle Aircraft Certification Office and
Transport Standards Staff reviewed this design and determined that it
represented the kind and quantity of
[[Page 17327]]
material that should be required to pass the heat release and smoke
emissions requirements. We have determined that special conditions
would be promulgated to apply the standards defined in 14 CFR 25.853(d)
to seats with large, non-metallic panels in their design.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions apply to Airbus A350-
900 series airplanes. Should Airbus apply later for a change to the
type certificate to include another model incorporating the same novel
or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on Airbus A350-900 series airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
So, by the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
following special conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Airbus A350-900 series airplanes with passenger
seats that have non-traditional, large, non-metallic panels.
1. Compliance with 14 CFR part 25 Appendix F, parts IV and V, heat
release and smoke emission, is required for seats that incorporate non-
traditional, large nonmetallic panels that may either be a single
component or multiple components in a concentrated area in their
design.
2. The applicant may designate up to and including 1.5 square feet
of non-traditional, nonmetallic panel material per seat place that does
not have to comply with No. 1. A triple seat assembly may have a total
of 4.5 square feet excluded on any portion of the assembly (e.g.,
outboard seat place 1 sq. ft., middle 1 sq. ft., and inboard 2.5 sq.
ft.).
3. Seats need not meet the test requirements of 14 CFR part 25
Appendix F, parts IV and V when installed in compartments that are not
otherwise required to meet these requirements. Examples include:
a. Airplanes with passenger capacities of 19 or less,
b. Airplanes exempted from smoke and heat release requirements.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 14, 2012.
John Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-7235 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P