General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Information Collection; Identification of Products With Environmental Attributes, 17481-17482 [2012-7197]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Legal Analysis
The January and June 2008 price
restraints among Star, McWane, and
Sigma alleged in the complaint are
naked restraints on competition that are
per se unlawful.2
The June 2008 agreement, which was
allegedly reached after a public
invitation to collude by McWane,
illustrates how price fixing agreements
may be reached in public. Here,
McWane’s invitation to collude was
conveyed in a letter sent to waterworks
distributors, the common customers of
Star, McWane, and Sigma. McWane’s
letter contained a section that was
meaningless to waterworks distributors,
but was intended to inform Star and
Sigma of the terms on which McWane
desired to fix prices.3
The DIFRA information exchange was
a component of the illegal price fixing
agreement. Specifically, the complaint
alleges that the DIFRA information
exchange played a critical role in the
2008 price fixing conspiracy, first as the
quid pro quo for a price increase by
McWane in June 2008, and then by
enabling Star, McWane, and Sigma to
monitor each others’ adherence to the
collusive arrangement through the
second half of 2008.
Evaluated apart from the price fixing
conspiracy, Star’s participation in the
information exchange is an independent
violation of the antitrust laws because
this concerted action facilitated price
coordination among the three
competitors.4
2 Federal Trade Commission & United States
Department of Justice, Antitrust Guidelines for
Collaboration Among Competitors (‘‘Competitor
Collaboration Guidelines’’) § 1.2 (2000); In re North
Texas Specialty Physicians, 140 F.T.C. 715, 729
(2005) (‘‘We do not believe that the per se
condemnation of naked restraints has been affected
by anything said either in California Dental or
Polygram’’).
3 Because McWane’s communication informed its
rivals of the terms of price coordination desired by
McWane without containing any information for
customers, this communication had no legitimate
business justification. See In re Petroleum Products
Antitrust Litig., 906 F.2d 432, 448 (9th Cir. 1990)
(public communications may form the basis of an
agreement on price levels when ‘‘the public
dissemination of such information served little
purpose other than to facilitate interdependent or
collusive price coordination’’).
4 The Commission articulated a safe harbor for
exchanges of price and cost information in
Statement 6 of the 1996 Health Care Guidelines. See
Dep’t of Justice & Federal Trade Comm’n,
Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in
Health Care, Statement 6: Enforcement Policy on
Provider Participation in Exchanges of Price and
Cost Information (1996). The DIFRA information
exchange failed to qualify for the safety zone of the
Health Care Guidelines for several reasons.
Although the DIFRA information exchange was
managed by a third party, the information
exchanged was insufficiently historical, the
participants in the exchange too few, and their
individual market shares too large to qualify for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:32 Mar 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
III. The Proposed Order
The proposed order is designed to
remedy the unlawful conduct charged
against Star in the complaint and to
prevent the recurrence of such conduct.
Paragraph II.A of the proposed order
prohibits Star from participating in or
maintaining any combination or
conspiracy between any competitors to
fix, raise or stabilize the prices at which
DIPF are sold in the United States, or to
allocate or divide markets, customers, or
business opportunities.
Paragraph II.B of the proposed order
prohibits Star from soliciting or inviting
any competitor to participate in any of
the actions prohibited in Paragraphs
II.A.
Paragraph II.C of the proposed order
prohibits Star from participating in or
facilitating any agreement between
competitors to exchange ‘‘Competitively
Sensitive Information’’ (‘‘CSI’’), defined
as certain types of information related to
the cost, price, output or customers of
or for DIPF. Paragraph II.D of the
proposed order prohibits Star from
unilaterally disclosing CSI to a
competitor, except as part of the
negotiation of a joint venture, license or
acquisition, or in certain other specified
circumstances. Paragraph II.E of the
proposed order prohibits Star from
attempting to engage in any of the
activities prohibited by Paragraphs II.A,
II.B, II.C, or II.D.
The prohibitions on Star’s
communication of CSI with competitors
contained in Paragraphs II.C and II.D of
the proposed order are subject to a
proviso that permits Star to
communicate CSI to its competitors
under certain circumstances. Under the
proposed order, Star may participate in
an information exchange with its
competitors in the DIPF market
provided that the information exchange
is structured in such a way as to
minimize the risk that it will facilitate
collusion among Star and its
competitors. Specifically, the proposed
order requires any exchange of CSI to
occur no more than twice yearly, and to
involve the exchange of aggregated
information more than six months old.
In addition, the aggregated information
that is exchanged must be made
publicly available, which increases the
likelihood that an information exchange
involving Star will simultaneously
benefit consumers. The proposed order
also prohibits Star’s participation in an
permissive treatment contemplated by the Health
Care Guidelines. While failing to qualify for the
safety zone of the Health Care Guidelines is not in
itself a violation of Section 5, firms that wish to
minimize the risk of antitrust scrutiny should
consider structuring their collaborations in
accordance with the criteria of the safety zone.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17481
exchange of CSI involving price, cost or
total unit cost of or for DIPF when the
individual or collective market shares of
the competitors seeking to participate in
an information exchange exceed
specified thresholds. The rationale for
this provision is that in a highly
concentrated market the risk that the
information exchange may facilitate
collusion is high. Due to the highly
concentrated state of the DIPF market as
currently structured, an information
exchange involving Star and relating to
price, output or total unit cost of or for
DIPF is unlikely to reoccur in the
foreseeable future.
Paragraph III of the proposed order
requires Star to cooperate with
Commission staff in the still-pending
administrative litigation against
McWane.
The proposed order has a term of 20
years.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–7234 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 3090–0262; Docket 2012–
0001; Sequence 3]
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation; Information
Collection; Identification of Products
With Environmental Attributes
AGENCY:
Office of Acquisition Policy,
GSA.
Notice of request for comments
regarding a extension of a previously
existing OMB clearance.
ACTION:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act the
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve an extension of a
previously approved information
collection requirement regarding
identification of products with
environmental attributes.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary and whether it
will have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate and
based on valid assumptions and
methodology; and ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected.
DATES: Submit comments on or before:
May 25, 2012.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
17482
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices
Ms.
Dana Munson, Procurement Analyst,
General Services Acquisition Policy
Division, GSA, at telephone (202) 357–
9652 or via email to
dana.munson@gsa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
3090–0262, Identification of Products
with Environmental Attributes, by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
inputting ‘‘Information Collection 3090–
0262, Identification of Products with
Environmental Attributes’’, under the
heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and
selecting ‘‘Search’’. Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘Information Collection 3090–
0262, Identification of Products with
Environmental Attributes’’. Follow the
instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 3090–0262,
Identification of Products with
Environmental Attributes’’ on your
attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417. Attn: Hada
Flowers/IC 3090–0262, Identification of
Products with Environmental
Attributes.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
3090–0262, Identification of Products
with Environmental Attributes, in all
correspondence related to this
collection. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A. Purpose
General Services Administration
(GSA) requires contractors submitting
Multiple Award Schedule Contracts to
identify in their GSA price lists those
products that they market commercially
that have environmental attributes. The
identification of these products will
enable Federal agencies to maximize the
use of these products to meet the
responsibilities expressed in statutes
and executive orders.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 9,000.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 9,000.
Hours per Response: 3.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:32 Mar 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Total Burden Hours: 27,000.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the Regulatory Secretariat Division
(MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417, telephone (202)
501–4755. Please cite OMB Control No.
3090–0262, Identification of Products
with Environmental Attributes, in all
correspondence.
Dated: March 19, 2012.
Joseph A. Neurauter,
Director, Office of Acquisition Policy, Senior
Procurement Executive.
[FR Doc. 2012–7197 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–61–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration on Aging
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; State
Annual Long-Term Care Ombudsman
Report and Instructions
Administration on Aging, HHS.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Administration on Aging
(AoA) is announcing that the proposed
collection of information listed below
has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit written comments on the
collection of information by April 25,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the collection of information by fax
202.395.6974 or by mail to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, New Executive Office Bldg., 725
17th St. NW., Rm. 10235, Washington,
DC 20503, Attn: Brenda Aguilar, Desk
Officer for AoA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Louise Ryan, telephone: (202) 357–3503;
email: louise.ryan@aoa.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, AoA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
States provide the following data and
narrative information in the report:
1. Numbers and descriptions of cases
filed and complaints made on behalf of
long-term care facility residents to the
statewide ombudsman program;
2. Major issues identified impacting
on the quality of care and life of longterm care facility residents;
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Statewide program operations; and
4. Ombudsman activities in addition
to complaint investigation.
The report form and instructions have
been in continuous use, with minor
modifications, since they were first
approved by OMB for the FY 1995
reporting period. This request is for
approval to extend use of the current
form and instructions, with no
modifications, for three years, covering
the FY 2012–2014 reporting periods.
The data collected on complaints filed
with ombudsman programs and
narrative on long-term care issues
provide information to Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services and
others on patterns of concerns and
major long-term care issues affecting
residents of long-term care facilities.
Both the complaint and program data
collected assist the states and local
ombudsman programs in planning
strategies and activities, providing
training and technical assistance and
developing performance measures.
A reporting form and instructions
may be viewed in the ombudsman
section of the AoA Web site,
www.aoa.gov.
AoA estimates the burden of this
collection and entering the report
information as follows: Approximately
8,569 hours, with 52 State Agencies on
Aging responding annually.
Dated: March 2, 2012.
Kathy Greenlee,
Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 2012–7219 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0624]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Notice of
Participation
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by April 25,
2012.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17481-17482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7197]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 3090-0262; Docket 2012-0001; Sequence 3]
General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation;
Information Collection; Identification of Products With Environmental
Attributes
AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, GSA.
ACTION: Notice of request for comments regarding a extension of a
previously existing OMB clearance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act the
Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a
previously approved information collection requirement regarding
identification of products with environmental attributes.
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary and whether it will have
practical utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate and based on valid assumptions
and methodology; and ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected.
DATES: Submit comments on or before: May 25, 2012.
[[Page 17482]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Dana Munson, Procurement Analyst,
General Services Acquisition Policy Division, GSA, at telephone (202)
357-9652 or via email to dana.munson@gsa.gov.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 3090-
0262, Identification of Products with Environmental Attributes, by any
of the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by inputting ``Information
Collection 3090-0262, Identification of Products with Environmental
Attributes'', under the heading ``Enter Keyword or ID'' and selecting
``Search''. Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with
``Information Collection 3090-0262, Identification of Products with
Environmental Attributes''. Follow the instructions provided at the
``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if
any), and ``Information Collection 3090-0262, Identification of
Products with Environmental Attributes'' on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417. Attn:
Hada Flowers/IC 3090-0262, Identification of Products with
Environmental Attributes.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information
Collection 3090-0262, Identification of Products with Environmental
Attributes, in all correspondence related to this collection. All
comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business
confidential information provided.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
General Services Administration (GSA) requires contractors
submitting Multiple Award Schedule Contracts to identify in their GSA
price lists those products that they market commercially that have
environmental attributes. The identification of these products will
enable Federal agencies to maximize the use of these products to meet
the responsibilities expressed in statutes and executive orders.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 9,000.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 9,000.
Hours per Response: 3.
Total Burden Hours: 27,000.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from the Regulatory Secretariat
Division (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417, telephone
(202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 3090-0262, Identification
of Products with Environmental Attributes, in all correspondence.
Dated: March 19, 2012.
Joseph A. Neurauter,
Director, Office of Acquisition Policy, Senior Procurement Executive.
[FR Doc. 2012-7197 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-P