Inadmissibility of Consumer Products and Industrial Equipment Noncompliant With Applicable Energy Conservation or Labeling Standards, 17364-17367 [2012-7105]
Download as PDF
17364
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. An informal docket
may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the
Central Service Center, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking
(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of
Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking Distribution
System, which describes the application
procedure.
The Proposal
This action proposes to amend Title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR), Part 71 by establishing Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at West Memphis,
AR, to accommodate the separation of
existing Class E airspace surrounding
West Memphis Municipal Airport from
the Class E airspace of Memphis
International Airport, Memphis, TN.
The amendment for the existing Class E
airspace surrounding Memphis
International Airport, Memphis, TN,
would be simultaneously coordinated
with this action. Controlled airspace is
needed for the safety and management
of IFR operations at the airport.
Class E airspace areas are published
in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011 and
effective September 15, 2011, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document would be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Mar 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106 describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
establish controlled airspace at West
Memphis Municipal Airport, West
Memphis, AR.
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on March 14,
2012.
David P. Medina,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012–7096 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Part 12
[Docket No. USCBP–2012–0004]
RIN 1515–AD82
Inadmissibility of Consumer Products
and Industrial Equipment
Noncompliant With Applicable Energy
Conservation or Labeling Standards
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Proposed Amendment
SUMMARY:
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9V,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 9, 2011, and
effective September 15, 2011, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
ASW AR E5
*
*
West Memphis, AR [New]
West Memphis Municipal Airport, AR
(Lat. 35°08′06″ N., long. 90°14′04″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile
radius of West Memphis Municipal Airport.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
AGENCIES:
This document proposes
amendments to the Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to provide
that if certain imports do not comply
with applicable energy conservation or
labeling standards, CBP will refuse
admission when so notified by the
Department of Energy (DOE) or the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and
CBP may, upon a recommendation from
DOE or FTC, conditionally release the
goods so that they may be brought into
compliance. Specifically, CBP will
refuse admission into the customs
territory of the United States to
consumer products and industrial
equipment deemed noncompliant with
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act
of 1975 (EPCA) and its implementing
regulations, and for which CBP has
received written notice from the DOE or
the FTC that identifies merchandise as
noncompliant with applicable EPCA
requirements. In lieu of immediate
refusal of admission, and upon written
or electronic notice by DOE or FTC, CBP
may conditionally release under bond to
the importer such noncompliant
products or equipment for purposes of
reconditioning, re-labeling, or other
action so as to bring the subject product
or equipment into compliance with
applicable energy conservation and
labeling admissibility standards. If the
subject import is not timely brought into
compliance, CBP, at the direction of
DOE or FTC, will issue a refusal of
admission notice to the importer and
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules
demand redelivery of the subject
products to CBP custody. A failure to
comply with a demand for redelivery
will result in the assessment of
liquidated damages. This proposed
regulation, if adopted, will implement
the mandate of the EPCA, as amended,
to preclude admission into the United
States of certain consumer products and
industrial equipment that do not meet
applicable labeling or energy
conservation requirements.
Comments must be received on
or before May 25, 2012.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by USCBP docket number, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
via docket number USCBP–2012–0004.
• Mail: Trade and Commercial
Regulations Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
799 9th Street NW. (Mint Annex),
Washington, DC 20229–1179.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
USCBP docket number for this
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submitted
comments may also be inspected during
regular business days between the hours
of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and
Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, 799 9th Street NW.,
5th Floor, Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted
comments should be made in advance
by calling Joseph Clark at (202) 325–
0118.
ADDRESSES:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Craig, Chief, Interagency
Requirements Branch, Trade Policy and
Programs, Office of International Trade,
(202) 863–6558. Valarie M. Neuhart,
Import Safety & Interagency
Requirements Division, Office of
International Trade, (202) 863–6223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Mar 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) also invites comments
that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism effects that
might result from this proposed rule. If
appropriate to a specific comment, the
commenter should reference the specific
portion of the proposed rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include data, information, or
authority that support such
recommended change.
Background
General
Title III, Part B of the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA),
Public Law 94–163 (42 U.S.C. 6291–
6309), as amended, established the
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products Other Than
Automobiles, a program covering most
major household appliances. Similarly,
Title III, Part C of the EPCA, (42 U.S.C.
6311–6317) as amended, added by
Public Law 95–619, Title IV, section
441(a), established the Energy
Conservation Program for Certain
Industrial Equipment, a program
covering industrial equipment.
Section 6302(a) of title 42 of the
United States Code (42 U.S.C. 6302(a)),
and its implementing regulations,
prescribe the specific energy
conservation and labeling standards
applicable to manufacturers and, in
some instances, private labelers,
distributors, and retailers. Sections 6301
and 6316 of title 42 of the United States
Code (42 U.S.C. 6301 and 6316) require
the Secretary of the Treasury to issue
regulations refusing admission into the
customs territory of the United States to
covered products or covered equipment
offered for importation in violation of 42
U.S.C. 6302. The statute also provides
the Secretary with the discretion to
authorize the importation of covered
products or covered industrial
equipment under such terms and
conditions (including the furnishing of
a bond) that ensure that the
merchandise will not violate 42 U.S.C.
6302.
Proposed Regulation
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6301, this
document proposes to amend part 12 of
title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (19 CFR Part 12) by adding
a new § 12.50 which provides that CBP
will refuse admission into the customs
territory of the United States to covered
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17365
imports that the Department of Energy
(DOE) or the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) has determined to be in violation
of 42 U.S.C. 6302, upon receipt of
written or electronic notice from the
DOE or FTC, as appropriate. The notice
will identify a named regulated party as
being in violation of 42 U.S.C. 6302 and
will describe the subject product or
equipment in a manner sufficient to
enable CBP to identify the articles.
While refusal of admission will be the
norm, there may be instances where
reconditioning, re-labeling, or other
modification may bring an import into
compliance with applicable energy
conservation or labeling admissibility
standards. Accordingly, this rule
proposes a procedure to allow CBP to
conditionally release noncompliant
imports to the importer under a CBP
basic importation and entry bond for
purposes of bringing the merchandise
into conformity with the applicable
standards, upon a recommendation by
the DOE or FTC. In any case involving
conditional release of a covered import
under bond, the CBP port director
always retains the discretion to require
additional security in any case where he
believes that acceptance of a continuous
bond would hamper the enforcement of
the law. See 19 CFR 113.13(d). An
initial conditional release period of 30
days is proposed to be established by
this rulemaking.
If the DOE or FTC notifies CBP that
the subject imports have been brought
into compliance with applicable energy
conservation and labeling admissibility
standards before the conclusion of the
30-day conditional release period, or
any authorized extension thereof, CBP
may release the subject goods into the
commerce and entry may be completed.
If attempts at modification fail within
the 30-day conditional release period, or
any authorized extension thereof, the
DOE or FTC will notify CBP of that fact,
and CBP will issue a notice of refusal of
admission to the importer concurrent
with a demand for redelivery under the
terms and conditions of the CBP bond.
A failure to comply with the demand for
redelivery will result in the assessment
of liquidated damages equal to three
times the value of the imports at issue.
Moreover, covered imports that are
conditionally released will be under the
concurrent jurisdiction of DOE and/or
FTC.
The proposed amendments are
consistent with § 429.5(b) of title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR
429.5(b)), which is a DOE regulation
that further notifies the importing
public that any covered product or
equipment offered for importation that
does not meet the applicable energy
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
17366
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules
conservation standards set forth in 42
U.S.C. 6291–6317 will be refused
admission into the customs territory of
the United States under CBP issued
regulations.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ although not
economically significant, under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of
the rule on small entities as required by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.), as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement and
Fairness Act of 1996. A small entity may
be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated
business not dominant in its field that
qualifies as a small business per the
Small Business Act); a small not-forprofit organization; or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people).
The proposed rule, if finalized, will
establish a procedure whereby the DOE
or the FTC will notify CBP of any
imported article that is in violation of 42
U.S.C 6302 and its implementing
regulations. Upon notification, CBP will
refuse these articles admission into the
commerce of the United States. Upon a
recommendation by the DOE or FTC,
however, CBP will conditionally release
noncompliant imported articles under a
CBP basic importation and entry bond
for the purpose of bringing the
merchandise into compliance with 42
U.S.C. 6302 and its implementing
regulations. This conditional release is
valid for a period of 30 days, but it may
be extended by the DOE or FTC.
The DOE has identified only a small
number of businesses importing
noncompliant articles, of which fewer
than five were small entities. When
notified of their noncompliance, each of
these businesses ceased importation of
these articles. Given the small number
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Mar 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
of small entities identified by DOE as
having been noncompliant and that the
law prohibiting the importation of these
noncompliant articles within the United
States was enacted in 1975, CBP does
not anticipate a significant number of
small entities attempting to import
articles which violate 42 U.S.C 6302 and
its implementing regulations. If a small
entity does import an article in violation
of 42 U.S.C 6302 and its implementing
regulations, the small entity can request
the DOE or the FTC allow CBP to grant
the imported article a conditional
release. CBP believes that cost
associated with this conditional release
to be negligible because this request is
virtually costless to the small entity and
the importer is already required to
maintain a CBP basic importation and
entry bond.
Accordingly, CBP does not believe
this rule will have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. CBP welcomes any comments
regarding this assessment. If CBP does
not receive any comments contradicting
this finding, CBP will certify that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities at the final rule
stage.
Paperwork Reduction Act
As there is no collection of
information proposed in this document,
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507)
are inapplicable.
Signing Authority
This proposed regulation is being
issued in accordance with 19 CFR
0.1(a)(1) pertaining to the Secretary of
the Treasury’s authority (or that of his
delegate) to approve regulations related
to certain customs revenue functions.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 12
Customs duties and inspection,
Electronic products, Entry of
merchandise, Imports, Prohibited
merchandise, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Restricted
merchandise, Seizure and forfeiture.
Proposed Amendments to the CBP
Regulations
For the reasons stated above, it is
proposed to amend part 12 of title 19 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR
Part 12) as set forth below.
PART 12—SPECIAL CLASSES OF
MERCHANDISE
1. The general authority citation for
part 12 continues to read as follows and
the specific authority citation is added
to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66,
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)),
1624;
*
*
*
*
*
Section 12.50 also issued under 42 U.S.C.
6301;
*
*
*
*
*
2. A new center heading and new
§ 12.50 are added to read as follows:
Consumer Products and Industrial
Equipment Subject to Energy
Conservation or Labeling Standards
§ 12.50 Consumer products and industrial
equipment subject to energy conservation
or labeling standards.
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this
section, the following terms have the
meanings indicated:
Covered import. The term ‘‘covered
import’’ means a consumer product or
industrial equipment that is classified
by the Department of Energy as covered
by an applicable energy conservation
standard, or by the Federal Trade
Commission as covered by an applicable
energy labeling standard, pursuant to
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act
of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 62916317), and that is imported or attempted
to be imported.
DOE. The term ‘‘DOE’’ means the
Department of Energy.
Energy conservation standard. The
term ‘‘energy conservation standard’’
means any standard meeting the
definitions of that term in 42 U.S.C.
6291(6) or 42 U.S.C. 6311(18).
FTC. The term ‘‘FTC’’ means the
Federal Trade Commission.
Noncompliant covered import. The
term ‘‘noncompliant covered import’’
means a covered import that the
Department of Energy (DOE) or the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has
determined to be in violation of 42
U.S.C. 6302.
(b) CBP action. If a covered import
does not comply with applicable energy
conservation or labeling admissibility
standards, the DOE or FTC may direct
CBP to either refuse admission of the
covered import pursuant to paragraph
(c) of this section or recommend
conditional release of the covered
import to be brought into compliance
pursuant to paragraph (d) of this
section.
(c) Refusal of admission. CBP will
refuse admission into the customs
territory of the United States to any
noncompliant covered import upon
receipt of written or electronic notice
from the DOE (see also 10 CFR 429.5)
or FTC that identifies the importer of
the noncompliant covered import and
describes the subject import in a manner
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules
sufficient to enable CBP to identify the
article.
(d) Conditional release. In lieu of
immediate refusal of admission into the
customs territory of the United States,
CBP, upon a recommendation from the
DOE or FTC, may permit the release of
a noncompliant covered import to the
importer of record for purposes of
reconditioning, re-labeling, or other
modification. The release from CBP
custody of any such covered import will
be deemed conditional and subject to
the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62
of this Chapter. Note: Conditionally
released covered imports will also be
subject to the jurisdiction of DOE and/
or FTC.
(1) Duration. Unless extended in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this
section, the conditional release period
will terminate upon the earliest
occurring of the following events:
(i) The date that CBP issues a notice
of refusal of admission pursuant to
paragraph (c) of this section;
(ii) The date that the DOE or FTC
issues a notice to CBP stating that the
covered import is in compliance and
may proceed; or
(iii) At the conclusion of the 30-day
period following the date of release.
(2) Extension. The conditional release
period may be extended if both CBP and
the importer of record receive, within
the initial 30-day conditional release
period or any subsequent authorized
extension thereof, a written or electronic
notice from the DOE or FTC stating the
reason for and anticipated length of the
extension.
(3) Issuance of a redelivery notice and
demand for redelivery. If the
noncompliant covered import is not
timely brought into compliance, and if
so directed by DOE or FTC, CBP will
issue a refusal of admission notice to the
importer pursuant to paragraph (c) of
this section and, in addition, CBP will
demand the redelivery of the specified
covered product to CBP custody. The
demand for redelivery may be made
concurrently with the notice of refusal
of admission.
(4) Liquidated damages. A failure to
comply with a demand for redelivery
made under this paragraph (d) will
result in the assessment of liquidated
damages equal to three times the value
of the covered product. Value as used in
this provision means value as
determined under 19 U.S.C. 1401a.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Mar 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Approved: March 20, 2012.
David V. Aguilar,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2012–7105 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 111
[USCBP–2010–0038]
RIN 1651–AA80
Permissible Sharing of Client Records
by Customs Brokers
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking,
published in the Federal Register on
October 27, 2010, that proposed
amendments to the Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations that would
allow brokers, upon the client’s consent
in a written authorization, to share
client information with affiliated
entities related to the broker so that
these entities may offer non-customs
business services to the broker’s clients.
Although the proposed rule was
prepared in response to a request from
a member of the broker community
seeking to allow brokers to share clients’
information for marketing purposes,
there was opposition to the proposal
from brokers due to the condition on
sharing the information that CBP
included in the document to protect
importers’ proprietary information. The
notice is being withdrawn to permit
further consideration of the relevant
issues involved in the proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Effective March 26, 2012, the
proposed rule published October 27,
2010, (75 FR 66050), is withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anita Harris, Chief, Broker Compliance
Branch, Trade Policy and Programs,
Office of International Trade, (202) 863–
6069.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
On October 27, 2010, Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) published a
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17367
notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register (75 FR 66050)
pertaining to the obligations of customs
brokers to keep clients’ information
confidential. The proposed amendment
would allow brokers, upon the client’s
written consent, to share client
information with affiliated entities
related to the broker so that these
entities may offer non-customs business
services to the broker’s clients. The
proposed amendment would also allow
customs brokers to use a third-party to
perform photocopying, scanning, and
delivery of client records for the broker.
These proposed changes were intended
to update the regulations to reflect
modern business practices, while
protecting the confidentiality of client
(importer) information. The comment
period ended on December 27, 2010.
CBP received public comment on the
proposed rulemaking. The majority of
commenters expressed concern that the
proposed rule did not serve the interests
of the importing public. Specifically,
there was opposition to the proposal
from brokers due to the condition on
sharing the information that CBP
included in the document to protect
importers’ proprietary information.
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
CBP is withdrawing the notice
published in the Federal Register (75
FR 66050) on October 27, 2010, pending
further consideration of the relevant
issues involved in the proposed
rulemaking.
Dated: March 21, 2012.
David V. Aguilar,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2012–7223 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2009–0919; A–1–FRL–
9651–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; Regional Haze
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing approval of
a revision to the Connecticut State
Implementation Plan (SIP) that
addresses regional haze for the first
planning period from 2008 through
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17364-17367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7105]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Part 12
[Docket No. USCBP-2012-0004]
RIN 1515-AD82
Inadmissibility of Consumer Products and Industrial Equipment
Noncompliant With Applicable Energy Conservation or Labeling Standards
AGENCIES: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes amendments to the Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to provide that if certain imports do not
comply with applicable energy conservation or labeling standards, CBP
will refuse admission when so notified by the Department of Energy
(DOE) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and CBP may, upon a
recommendation from DOE or FTC, conditionally release the goods so that
they may be brought into compliance. Specifically, CBP will refuse
admission into the customs territory of the United States to consumer
products and industrial equipment deemed noncompliant with the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA) and its implementing
regulations, and for which CBP has received written notice from the DOE
or the FTC that identifies merchandise as noncompliant with applicable
EPCA requirements. In lieu of immediate refusal of admission, and upon
written or electronic notice by DOE or FTC, CBP may conditionally
release under bond to the importer such noncompliant products or
equipment for purposes of reconditioning, re-labeling, or other action
so as to bring the subject product or equipment into compliance with
applicable energy conservation and labeling admissibility standards. If
the subject import is not timely brought into compliance, CBP, at the
direction of DOE or FTC, will issue a refusal of admission notice to
the importer and
[[Page 17365]]
demand redelivery of the subject products to CBP custody. A failure to
comply with a demand for redelivery will result in the assessment of
liquidated damages. This proposed regulation, if adopted, will
implement the mandate of the EPCA, as amended, to preclude admission
into the United States of certain consumer products and industrial
equipment that do not meet applicable labeling or energy conservation
requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 25, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by USCBP docket number,
by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments via docket number
USCBP-2012-0004.
Mail: Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch, Regulations
and Rulings, Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, 799 9th Street NW. (Mint Annex), Washington, DC 20229-1179.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and USCBP docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the
``Public Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Submitted comments
may also be inspected during regular business days between the hours of
9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Trade and Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, 799 9th Street NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC.
Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by
calling Joseph Clark at (202) 325-0118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Craig, Chief, Interagency
Requirements Branch, Trade Policy and Programs, Office of International
Trade, (202) 863-6558. Valarie M. Neuhart, Import Safety & Interagency
Requirements Division, Office of International Trade, (202) 863-6223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also invites
comments that relate to the economic, environmental, or federalism
effects that might result from this proposed rule. If appropriate to a
specific comment, the commenter should reference the specific portion
of the proposed rule, explain the reason for any recommended change,
and include data, information, or authority that support such
recommended change.
Background
General
Title III, Part B of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975
(EPCA), Public Law 94-163 (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309), as amended,
established the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles, a program covering most major household appliances.
Similarly, Title III, Part C of the EPCA, (42 U.S.C. 6311-6317) as
amended, added by Public Law 95-619, Title IV, section 441(a),
established the Energy Conservation Program for Certain Industrial
Equipment, a program covering industrial equipment.
Section 6302(a) of title 42 of the United States Code (42 U.S.C.
6302(a)), and its implementing regulations, prescribe the specific
energy conservation and labeling standards applicable to manufacturers
and, in some instances, private labelers, distributors, and retailers.
Sections 6301 and 6316 of title 42 of the United States Code (42 U.S.C.
6301 and 6316) require the Secretary of the Treasury to issue
regulations refusing admission into the customs territory of the United
States to covered products or covered equipment offered for importation
in violation of 42 U.S.C. 6302. The statute also provides the Secretary
with the discretion to authorize the importation of covered products or
covered industrial equipment under such terms and conditions (including
the furnishing of a bond) that ensure that the merchandise will not
violate 42 U.S.C. 6302.
Proposed Regulation
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6301, this document proposes to amend part 12
of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR Part 12) by
adding a new Sec. 12.50 which provides that CBP will refuse admission
into the customs territory of the United States to covered imports that
the Department of Energy (DOE) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
has determined to be in violation of 42 U.S.C. 6302, upon receipt of
written or electronic notice from the DOE or FTC, as appropriate. The
notice will identify a named regulated party as being in violation of
42 U.S.C. 6302 and will describe the subject product or equipment in a
manner sufficient to enable CBP to identify the articles.
While refusal of admission will be the norm, there may be instances
where reconditioning, re-labeling, or other modification may bring an
import into compliance with applicable energy conservation or labeling
admissibility standards. Accordingly, this rule proposes a procedure to
allow CBP to conditionally release noncompliant imports to the importer
under a CBP basic importation and entry bond for purposes of bringing
the merchandise into conformity with the applicable standards, upon a
recommendation by the DOE or FTC. In any case involving conditional
release of a covered import under bond, the CBP port director always
retains the discretion to require additional security in any case where
he believes that acceptance of a continuous bond would hamper the
enforcement of the law. See 19 CFR 113.13(d). An initial conditional
release period of 30 days is proposed to be established by this
rulemaking.
If the DOE or FTC notifies CBP that the subject imports have been
brought into compliance with applicable energy conservation and
labeling admissibility standards before the conclusion of the 30-day
conditional release period, or any authorized extension thereof, CBP
may release the subject goods into the commerce and entry may be
completed.
If attempts at modification fail within the 30-day conditional
release period, or any authorized extension thereof, the DOE or FTC
will notify CBP of that fact, and CBP will issue a notice of refusal of
admission to the importer concurrent with a demand for redelivery under
the terms and conditions of the CBP bond. A failure to comply with the
demand for redelivery will result in the assessment of liquidated
damages equal to three times the value of the imports at issue.
Moreover, covered imports that are conditionally released will be under
the concurrent jurisdiction of DOE and/or FTC.
The proposed amendments are consistent with Sec. 429.5(b) of title
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 429.5(b)), which is a DOE
regulation that further notifies the importing public that any covered
product or equipment offered for importation that does not meet the
applicable energy
[[Page 17366]]
conservation standards set forth in 42 U.S.C. 6291-6317 will be refused
admission into the customs territory of the United States under CBP
issued regulations.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory action''
although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
This section examines the impact of the rule on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act
of 1996. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field
that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act); a small
not-for-profit organization; or a small governmental jurisdiction
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
The proposed rule, if finalized, will establish a procedure whereby
the DOE or the FTC will notify CBP of any imported article that is in
violation of 42 U.S.C 6302 and its implementing regulations. Upon
notification, CBP will refuse these articles admission into the
commerce of the United States. Upon a recommendation by the DOE or FTC,
however, CBP will conditionally release noncompliant imported articles
under a CBP basic importation and entry bond for the purpose of
bringing the merchandise into compliance with 42 U.S.C. 6302 and its
implementing regulations. This conditional release is valid for a
period of 30 days, but it may be extended by the DOE or FTC.
The DOE has identified only a small number of businesses importing
noncompliant articles, of which fewer than five were small entities.
When notified of their noncompliance, each of these businesses ceased
importation of these articles. Given the small number of small entities
identified by DOE as having been noncompliant and that the law
prohibiting the importation of these noncompliant articles within the
United States was enacted in 1975, CBP does not anticipate a
significant number of small entities attempting to import articles
which violate 42 U.S.C 6302 and its implementing regulations. If a
small entity does import an article in violation of 42 U.S.C 6302 and
its implementing regulations, the small entity can request the DOE or
the FTC allow CBP to grant the imported article a conditional release.
CBP believes that cost associated with this conditional release to be
negligible because this request is virtually costless to the small
entity and the importer is already required to maintain a CBP basic
importation and entry bond.
Accordingly, CBP does not believe this rule will have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities. CBP welcomes any
comments regarding this assessment. If CBP does not receive any
comments contradicting this finding, CBP will certify that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities at the final rule stage.
Paperwork Reduction Act
As there is no collection of information proposed in this document,
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507)
are inapplicable.
Signing Authority
This proposed regulation is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR
0.1(a)(1) pertaining to the Secretary of the Treasury's authority (or
that of his delegate) to approve regulations related to certain customs
revenue functions.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 12
Customs duties and inspection, Electronic products, Entry of
merchandise, Imports, Prohibited merchandise, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Restricted merchandise, Seizure and
forfeiture.
Proposed Amendments to the CBP Regulations
For the reasons stated above, it is proposed to amend part 12 of
title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR Part 12) as set
forth below.
PART 12--SPECIAL CLASSES OF MERCHANDISE
1. The general authority citation for part 12 continues to read as
follows and the specific authority citation is added to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i),
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)), 1624;
* * * * *
Section 12.50 also issued under 42 U.S.C. 6301;
* * * * *
2. A new center heading and new Sec. 12.50 are added to read as
follows:
Consumer Products and Industrial Equipment Subject to Energy
Conservation or Labeling Standards
Sec. 12.50 Consumer products and industrial equipment subject to
energy conservation or labeling standards.
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following terms
have the meanings indicated:
Covered import. The term ``covered import'' means a consumer
product or industrial equipment that is classified by the Department of
Energy as covered by an applicable energy conservation standard, or by
the Federal Trade Commission as covered by an applicable energy
labeling standard, pursuant to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act
of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6291- 6317), and that is imported or
attempted to be imported.
DOE. The term ``DOE'' means the Department of Energy.
Energy conservation standard. The term ``energy conservation
standard'' means any standard meeting the definitions of that term in
42 U.S.C. 6291(6) or 42 U.S.C. 6311(18).
FTC. The term ``FTC'' means the Federal Trade Commission.
Noncompliant covered import. The term ``noncompliant covered
import'' means a covered import that the Department of Energy (DOE) or
the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has determined to be in violation of
42 U.S.C. 6302.
(b) CBP action. If a covered import does not comply with applicable
energy conservation or labeling admissibility standards, the DOE or FTC
may direct CBP to either refuse admission of the covered import
pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section or recommend conditional
release of the covered import to be brought into compliance pursuant to
paragraph (d) of this section.
(c) Refusal of admission. CBP will refuse admission into the
customs territory of the United States to any noncompliant covered
import upon receipt of written or electronic notice from the DOE (see
also 10 CFR 429.5) or FTC that identifies the importer of the
noncompliant covered import and describes the subject import in a
manner
[[Page 17367]]
sufficient to enable CBP to identify the article.
(d) Conditional release. In lieu of immediate refusal of admission
into the customs territory of the United States, CBP, upon a
recommendation from the DOE or FTC, may permit the release of a
noncompliant covered import to the importer of record for purposes of
reconditioning, re-labeling, or other modification. The release from
CBP custody of any such covered import will be deemed conditional and
subject to the bond conditions set forth in Sec. 113.62 of this
Chapter. Note: Conditionally released covered imports will also be
subject to the jurisdiction of DOE and/or FTC.
(1) Duration. Unless extended in accordance with paragraph (d)(2)
of this section, the conditional release period will terminate upon the
earliest occurring of the following events:
(i) The date that CBP issues a notice of refusal of admission
pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section;
(ii) The date that the DOE or FTC issues a notice to CBP stating
that the covered import is in compliance and may proceed; or
(iii) At the conclusion of the 30-day period following the date of
release.
(2) Extension. The conditional release period may be extended if
both CBP and the importer of record receive, within the initial 30-day
conditional release period or any subsequent authorized extension
thereof, a written or electronic notice from the DOE or FTC stating the
reason for and anticipated length of the extension.
(3) Issuance of a redelivery notice and demand for redelivery. If
the noncompliant covered import is not timely brought into compliance,
and if so directed by DOE or FTC, CBP will issue a refusal of admission
notice to the importer pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section and,
in addition, CBP will demand the redelivery of the specified covered
product to CBP custody. The demand for redelivery may be made
concurrently with the notice of refusal of admission.
(4) Liquidated damages. A failure to comply with a demand for
redelivery made under this paragraph (d) will result in the assessment
of liquidated damages equal to three times the value of the covered
product. Value as used in this provision means value as determined
under 19 U.S.C. 1401a.
Approved: March 20, 2012.
David V. Aguilar,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2012-7105 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P