Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Near Infrared Brain Hematoma Detector, 16925-16927 [2012-6975]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
comment period, we intend to publish
a document in the Federal Register
confirming the effective date within 30
days after the comment period ends.
III. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866,
Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct Agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Agency believes that this final rule is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires Agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because this rule does not
impose any significant costs, we certify
that it will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $136
million, using the most current (2010)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. We do not expect
this rule to result in any 1-year
expenditure that would meet or exceed
this amount.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
We have concluded that this direct
final rule contains no collection of
information. Therefore, clearance by the
Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) is not required.
V. Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.33 that this direct final rule is of a
type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Mar 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
VI. Federalism
We have analyzed this direct final
rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. We
have determined that this direct final
rule does not contain policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, we
have concluded this direct final rule
does not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
VII. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document, and they may
be accompanied by a supporting
memorandum or brief. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 20
Confidential business information,
Courts, Freedom of information,
Government employees.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 20 is
amended as follows:
PART 20—PUBLIC INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 20 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 18 U.S.C. 1905; 19
U.S.C. 2531–2582; 21 U.S.C. 321–393, 1401–
1403; 42 U.S.C. 241, 242, 242a, 242l, 242n,
243, 262, 263, 263b–263n, 264, 265, 300u–
300u–5, 300aa–1.
2. Amend § 20.108 as follows:
a. Revise paragraph (b);
b. Remove paragraph (c);
c. Redesignate paragraph (d) as
paragraph (c);
■ d. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (c).
The revisions and redesignations read
as follows:
■
■
■
■
§ 20.108 Agreements between the Food
and Drug Administration and other
departments, agencies, and organizations.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00019
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
16925
(b) All written agreements and
memoranda of understanding between
FDA and any entity, including, but not
limited to other departments, Agencies,
and organizations will be made
available through the Food and Drug
Administration Web site at https://
www.fda.gov once finalized.
(c) Agreements and understandings
signed by officials of FDA with respect
to activities of the Office of Criminal
Investigations are exempt from the
requirements set forth in paragraph (b)
of this section. Although such
agreements and understandings will not
be made available through the FDA Web
site, these agreements will be available
for disclosure in response to a request
from the public after deletion of
information that would disclose
confidential investigative techniques or
procedures, or information that would
disclose guidelines for law enforcement
investigations if such disclosure could
reasonably be expected to risk
circumvention of the law.
Dated: March 16, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–6967 Filed 3–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA–2012–M–0206]
Medical Devices; Neurological
Devices; Classification of the Near
Infrared Brain Hematoma Detector
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying the
Near Infrared (NIR) Brain Hematoma
Detector into class II (special controls).
The Agency is classifying the device
into class II (special controls) in order
to provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This rule is effective April 23,
2012. The classification is applicable
beginning December 13, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daryl Kaufman, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2426, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6467.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
16926
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)),
devices that were not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976 (the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976), generally
referred to as postamendments devices,
are classified automatically by statute
into class III without any FDA
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
premarket approval, unless and until
the device is classified or reclassified
into class I or II, or FDA issues an order
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C.360c(i)), to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
The Agency determines whether new
devices are substantially equivalent to
predicate devices by means of
premarket notification procedures in
section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 of the
regulations (21 CFR part 807).
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act
provides that any person who submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that
has not previously been classified may,
within 30 days after receiving an order
classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act,
request FDA to classify the device under
the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1)
of the FD&C Act. FDA will, within 60
days of receiving this request, classify
the device by written order. This
classification will be the initial
classification of the device. Within 30
days after the issuance of an order
classifying the device, FDA must
publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing this classification.
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, FDA issued an order on
March 16, 2010, classifying the
Infrascanner into class III, because it
was not substantially equivalent to a
device that was introduced or delivered
for introduction into interstate
commerce for commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, or a device which
was subsequently reclassified into class
I or class II. On April 8, 2010, InfraScan,
Inc. submitted a petition requesting
classification of the Infrascanner Model
1000 under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. The manufacturer
recommended that the device be
classified into class II (Ref. 1).
Identified risk
Mitigation measures
Excessive laser power ..............................................................................
Interference with other devices ................................................................
Unit (hardware) malfunction .....................................................................
Software malfunction ................................................................................
Operator errors .........................................................................................
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Incorrect result (false positive and negative) ...........................................
Adverse tissue reaction ............................................................................
Battery failure (failure of device to operate) .............................................
FDA believes that the following
special controls address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness: (1) The sale,
distribution, and use of this device are
restricted to prescription use in
accordance with 21 CFR 801.109; (2)
The labeling must include specific
instructions and the clinical training
needed for the safe use of this device;
(3) Appropriate analysis/testing should
validate EMC, electrical safety, and
battery characteristics; (4) Performance
data should validate accuracy and
precision and safety features; (5) Any
elements of the device that may contact
the patient should be demonstrated to
be biocompatible; and (6) Appropriate
software verification, validation, and
hazard analysis should be performed.
Therefore, on December 13, 2011, FDA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Mar 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
petition in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act. FDA classifies devices into class II
if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its
intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the petition,
FDA determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
believes these special controls will
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
The device is assigned the generic
name Near Infrared (NIR) Brain
Hematoma Detector, and it is identified
as a noninvasive device that employs
near-infrared spectroscopy that is
intended to be used to evaluate
suspected brain hematomas.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated with this type of
device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks:
Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
Electrical safety and EMC.
Labeling.
Performance testing (nonclinical and clinical).
Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.
Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.
Labeling.
Training.
Labeling.
Biocompatibility.
Labeling.
issued an order to the petitioner
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding § 882.1935.
Following the effective date of this
final classification rule, any firm
submitting a 510(k) premarket
notification for an NIR Brain Hematoma
Detector will need to comply with the
special controls named in the
regulation.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act, if FDA determines that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. Therefore, this device
type is not exempt from premarket
notification requirements. Persons who
intend to market this type of device
must submit to FDA a premarket
notification, prior to marketing the
device, which contains information
about the NIR Brain Hematoma Detector
they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
III. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866,
Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). Executive Orders
12866 and 13563 direct Agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Agency believes that this final rule is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires Agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because reclassification of this
device from class III to class II will
relieve manufacturers of the device of
the cost of complying with the
premarket approval requirements of
section 515 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360e), and may permit small potential
competitors to enter the marketplace by
lowering their costs, the Agency
certifies that the final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $136
million, using the most current (2010)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this final rule to result in any 1-year
expenditure that would meet or exceed
this amount.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with RULES
IV. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a)
of the Executive order requires Agencies
to ‘‘construe * * * a Federal statute to
preempt State law only where the
statute contains an express preemption
provision or there is some other clear
evidence that the Congress intended
preemption of State law, or where the
exercise of State authority conflicts with
the exercise of Federal authority under
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Mar 22, 2012
Jkt 226001
the Federal statute.’’ Federal law
includes an express preemption
provision that preempts certain State
requirements ‘‘different from or in
addition to’’ certain Federal
requirements applicable to devices. 21
U.S.C. 360k; see Medtronic, Inc., v.
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), and Riegel v.
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008).
The special controls established by this
final rule create ‘‘requirements’’ under
21 U.S.C. 360(k).
V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule establishes special
controls that refer to currently approved
collections of information found in
other FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
21 CFR part 807, subpart E regarding
premarket notification submissions have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0120, and the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 801
regarding labeling have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
VI. Reference
The following reference has been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
1. Petition from InfraScan, Inc., April 8, 2010.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices, Neurological
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 882 is
amended as follows:
PART 882—NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 882 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
2. Section 882.1935 is added to
subpart B to read as follows:
■
§ 882.1935 Near Infrared (NIR) Brain
Hematoma Detector.
(a) Identification. A Near Infrared
(NIR) Brain Hematoma Detector is a
noninvasive device that employs nearinfrared spectroscopy that is intended to
be used to evaluate suspected brain
hematomas.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16927
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The sale, distribution, and use of
this device are restricted to prescription
use in accordance with § 801.109 of this
chapter;
(2) The labeling must include specific
instructions and the clinical training
needed for the safe use of this device;
(3) Appropriate analysis/testing
should validate electromagnetic
compatibility (EMC), electrical safety,
and battery characteristics;
(4) Performance data should validate
accuracy and precision and safety
features;
(5) Any elements of the device that
may contact the patient should be
demonstrated to be biocompatible; and,
(6) Appropriate software verification,
validation, and hazard analysis should
be performed.
Dated: March 16, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–6975 Filed 3–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0132]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Willamette River, Portland, OR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commander, Thirteenth
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the
Broadway Bridge across the Willamette
River, mile 11.7, at Portland, OR. This
deviation is necessary to accommodate
the Race for the Roses event scheduled
for April 1, 2012. This deviation allows
the bridge to remain in the closed
position to allow safe movement of
event participants.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
6:30 a.m. on April 1, 2012 through
7:30 a.m. April 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2012–
0132 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2012–0132 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They
are also available for inspection or
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16925-16927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6975]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA-2012-M-0206]
Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Near
Infrared Brain Hematoma Detector
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the Near
Infrared (NIR) Brain Hematoma Detector into class II (special
controls). The Agency is classifying the device into class II (special
controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This rule is effective April 23, 2012. The classification is
applicable beginning December 13, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daryl Kaufman, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2426, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6467.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 16926]]
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were not
in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of enactment
of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred to as
postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute into
class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain in
class III and require premarket approval, unless and until the device
is classified or reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues an
order finding the device to be substantially equivalent, in accordance
with section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.360c(i)), to a predicate
device that does not require premarket approval. The Agency determines
whether new devices are substantially equivalent to predicate devices
by means of premarket notification procedures in section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 of the regulations (21 CFR
part 807).
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act provides that any person who
submits a premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
for a device that has not previously been classified may, within 30
days after receiving an order classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, request FDA to classify the
device under the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act. FDA will, within 60 days of receiving this request, classify the
device by written order. This classification will be the initial
classification of the device. Within 30 days after the issuance of an
order classifying the device, FDA must publish a notice in the Federal
Register announcing this classification.
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, FDA issued an
order on March 16, 2010, classifying the Infrascanner into class III,
because it was not substantially equivalent to a device that was
introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce for
commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or a device which was
subsequently reclassified into class I or class II. On April 8, 2010,
InfraScan, Inc. submitted a petition requesting classification of the
Infrascanner Model 1000 under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the device be classified into class II
(Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the petition in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. FDA
classifies devices into class II if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the petition, FDA determined that the device
can be classified into class II with the establishment of special
controls. FDA believes these special controls will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
The device is assigned the generic name Near Infrared (NIR) Brain
Hematoma Detector, and it is identified as a noninvasive device that
employs near-infrared spectroscopy that is intended to be used to
evaluate suspected brain hematomas.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated with
this type of device and the measures required to mitigate these risks:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risk Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excessive laser power.................. Electrical safety and
electromagnetic compatibility
(EMC).
Interference with other devices........ Electrical safety and EMC.
Labeling.
Unit (hardware) malfunction............ Performance testing
(nonclinical and clinical).
Software verification,
validation, and hazard
analysis.
Software malfunction................... Software verification,
validation, and hazard
analysis.
Operator errors........................ Labeling.
Training.
Incorrect result (false positive and Labeling.
negative).
Adverse tissue reaction................ Biocompatibility.
Battery failure (failure of device to Labeling.
operate).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA believes that the following special controls address these
risks to health and provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness: (1) The sale, distribution, and use of this device are
restricted to prescription use in accordance with 21 CFR 801.109; (2)
The labeling must include specific instructions and the clinical
training needed for the safe use of this device; (3) Appropriate
analysis/testing should validate EMC, electrical safety, and battery
characteristics; (4) Performance data should validate accuracy and
precision and safety features; (5) Any elements of the device that may
contact the patient should be demonstrated to be biocompatible; and (6)
Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis
should be performed. Therefore, on December 13, 2011, FDA issued an
order to the petitioner classifying the device into class II. FDA is
codifying the classification of the device by adding Sec. 882.1935.
Following the effective date of this final classification rule, any
firm submitting a 510(k) premarket notification for an NIR Brain
Hematoma Detector will need to comply with the special controls named
in the regulation.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act, if FDA determines that premarket notification
is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, this device type is not exempt from premarket notification
requirements. Persons who intend to market this type of device must
submit to FDA a premarket notification, prior to marketing the device,
which contains information about the NIR Brain Hematoma Detector they
intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
[[Page 16927]]
III. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct Agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and
equity). The Agency believes that this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because reclassification of this device from class
III to class II will relieve manufacturers of the device of the cost of
complying with the premarket approval requirements of section 515 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e), and may permit small potential
competitors to enter the marketplace by lowering their costs, the
Agency certifies that the final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $136 million, using the most current (2010) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
IV. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a) of the Executive order
requires Agencies to ``construe * * * a Federal statute to preempt
State law only where the statute contains an express preemption
provision or there is some other clear evidence that the Congress
intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of State
authority conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the
Federal statute.'' Federal law includes an express preemption provision
that preempts certain State requirements ``different from or in
addition to'' certain Federal requirements applicable to devices. 21
U.S.C. 360k; see Medtronic, Inc., v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), and
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). The special controls
established by this final rule create ``requirements'' under 21 U.S.C.
360(k).
V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final rule establishes special controls that refer to
currently approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations. These collections of information are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in 21
CFR part 807, subpart E regarding premarket notification submissions
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120, and the
collections of information in 21 CFR part 801 regarding labeling have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
VI. Reference
The following reference has been placed on display in the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
1. Petition from InfraScan, Inc., April 8, 2010.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices, Neurological devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
882 is amended as follows:
PART 882--NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 882 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.
0
2. Section 882.1935 is added to subpart B to read as follows:
Sec. 882.1935 Near Infrared (NIR) Brain Hematoma Detector.
(a) Identification. A Near Infrared (NIR) Brain Hematoma Detector
is a noninvasive device that employs near-infrared spectroscopy that is
intended to be used to evaluate suspected brain hematomas.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) The sale, distribution, and use of this device are restricted
to prescription use in accordance with Sec. 801.109 of this chapter;
(2) The labeling must include specific instructions and the
clinical training needed for the safe use of this device;
(3) Appropriate analysis/testing should validate electromagnetic
compatibility (EMC), electrical safety, and battery characteristics;
(4) Performance data should validate accuracy and precision and
safety features;
(5) Any elements of the device that may contact the patient should
be demonstrated to be biocompatible; and,
(6) Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard
analysis should be performed.
Dated: March 16, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-6975 Filed 3-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P