Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) Inviting Applications for the Rural Community Development Initiative (RCDI) for Fiscal Year 2011 and Fiscal Year 2012, 16519-16535 [2012-6611]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
Dated: March 16, 2012.
Jeffrey J. Tribiano,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–6786 Filed 3–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Tongass National Forest Wrangell
Ranger District; Alaska; Wrangell
Island Project Environmental Impact
Statement
Forest Service, USDA.
Corrected Notice of Intent to
prepare an environmental impact
statement; Correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
A Corrected Notice of Intent
(NOI) to prepare an environmental
impact Statement was published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 14727) on
March 13, 2012 concerning a request for
scoping comments. The document
contained incorrect dates.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Piazza, Team Leader, Federal Building,
Ketchikan, AK 99901, (907) 228–6318.
SUMMARY:
Correction
In the Federal Register of March 13,
2012 (77 FR 14727), on page 14727, in
the third column, correct the DATES
caption to read:
DATES: Comments received during the
initial scoping period in 2010–2011 will be
considered in the preparation of this EIS.
New or additional comments must be
received April 27, 2012. The draft
environmental impact statement is expected
in December 2012, and the final
environmental impact statement is expected
in June 2013.
Dated: March 13, 2012.
Forrest Cole,
Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2012–6780 Filed 3–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Rural Housing Service
Rural Housing Service, USDA.
Notice.
AGENCY:
This Notice announces the
availability of $8,611,000 of FYs 2011
and 2012 funding of competitive grant
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
The deadline for receipt of an
application—May 9, 2012. The
application date is firm. The Agency
will not consider any application
received after the deadline. Applicants
intending to mail applications must
provide sufficient time to permit
delivery on or before the closing
deadline date and time. Acceptance by
the United States Postal Service or
private mailer does not constitute
delivery. Facsimile (FAX) and postage
due applications will not be accepted.
DATES:
Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA)
Inviting Applications for the Rural
Community Development Initiative
(RCDI) for Fiscal Year 2011 and Fiscal
Year 2012
ACTION:
funds for the RCDI program through the
Rural Housing Service (RHS), an agency
within the USDA Rural Development
mission area (Agency). Appropriation
Acts made available $4,990,000 in FY
2011 and $3,621,000 in FY 2012 for the
RCDI program for a total of $8,611,000
for the two fiscal years.
The RCDI grant program includes an
initiative called the Rural Jobs and
Innovation Accelerator Challenge. For
FY 2011 and the FY 2012 RCDI funds
will be divided between the traditional
RCDI Program and the Rural Jobs and
Innovation Accelerator Challenge as
follows: $2,500,000 of the FY 2011
funds and $1,811,000 of the FY 2012
funds will be available for the
traditional RCDI program and
$2,490,000 of the FY 2011 funds and
$1,810,000 of the FY 2012 will be
reserved for awards through a Federal
Funding Opportunity Announcement in
partnership with the Department of
Commerce Economic Development
Administration (EDA) for the Rural Jobs
and Innovation Accelerator Challenge.
An application for ‘‘Rural Jobs and
Innovation Accelerator Challenge’’
funds must be submitted to both USDA
and EDA by an organization or a team
of organizations that is individually or
collectively eligible to receive funding
from USDA and EDA. Additional
information regarding the Rural Jobs
and Innovation Accelerator Challenge
can be found in Part VI and Part VII of
this NOFA. Requirements outlined in
Parts II, III, VIII, IX, X, and XI of this
NOFA apply to both the Traditional
RCDI Program and the Rural Jobs and
Innovation Accelerator Challenge.
All applicants must provide matching
funds in an amount at least equal to the
Federal grant. These grants will be made
to qualified intermediary organizations
that will provide financial and technical
assistance to recipients to develop their
capacity and ability to undertake
projects related to housing, community
facilities, or community and economic
development. This Notice lists the
information needed to submit an
application for these funds.
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16519
Entities wishing to apply for
assistance may download the
application documents and
requirements delineated in this Notice
from the RCDI Web site: https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rhs/rcdi/
index.htm. Application information for
electronic submissions may be found at
https://www.grants.gov. Applicants may
also request paper application packages
from the Rural Development office in
their state. A list of Rural Development
offices is included in this Notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Rural Development office for the state
the applicant is located in. A list of
Rural Development State Office contacts
is included in this Notice.
ADDRESSES:
Programs Affected
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
Number 10.446. This program is not
subject to the provisions of Executive
Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials because it is not
listed by the Secretary of Agriculture,
pursuant to 7 CFR 3015.302, as a
covered program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The paperwork burden has been
cleared by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control
Number 0575–0180.
National Environmental Policy Act
This Notice has been reviewed in
accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ‘‘Environmental Program.’’
Rural Development has determined that
an Environmental Impact Statement is
not required because the issuance of
regulations and instructions, as well as
amendments to them, describing
administrative and financial procedures
for processing, approving and
implementing the Agency’s financial
programs is categorically excluded in
the Agency’s NEPA regulation found at
7 CFR 1940.310(e)(3) of Subpart G,
Environmental Program. Thus, in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347), Rural
Development has determined that this
NOFA does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
Furthermore, individual awards under
this NOFA are hereby classified as
Categorical Exclusions according to
1940.310(e), the award of financial
assistance for planning purposes,
management and feasibility studies, or
environmental impact analysis, which
do not require any additional
documentation.
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
16520
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
intermediary is $50,000 and $300,000.
The intermediary must provide a
program of financial and technical
assistance to a private nonprofit,
community-based housing and
development organization, a lowincome rural community or a federally
recognized tribe.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview
Federal Agency: Rural Housing
Service.
Funding Opportunity Title: Rural
Community Development Initiative.
Announcement Type: Initial
Announcement.
Part III—Eligibility Information
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 10.446.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Part I—Funding Opportunity
Description
Congress initially created the RCDI in
Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 to develop the
capacity and ability of nonprofit
organizations, low-income rural
communities, or federally recognized
tribes to undertake projects related to
housing, community facilities, or
community and economic development
in rural areas.
Part II—Award Information
Appropriation Acts have made
available a total of $8,611,000 for RCDI
for FYs 2011 and 2012. The FY 2011
and the FY 2012 appropriated RCDI
funds will be divided between the
traditional RCDI Program and the Rural
Jobs and Innovation Accelerator
Challenge as follows: $2,500,000 of the
FY 2011 funds and $1,811,000 of the FY
2012 funds will be available for the
traditional RCDI program and
$2,490,000 of the FY 2011 funds and
$1,810,000 of the FY 2012 will be
reserved for awards through a Federal
Funding Opportunity Announcement in
partnership with the Department of
Commerce Economic Development
Administration for the Rural Jobs and
Innovation Accelerator Challenge. The
Rural Jobs Accelerator provides
resources to support the development of
clusters in approximately 20 regions,
selected through a competitive interagency grant process, and assist rural
distressed communities accelerate job
creation by: leveraging local assets,
building stronger communities, and
creating regional linkages.
Opportunities for accelerated job
creation in rural regions can be found in
numerous high-potential industry
clusters, including renewable energy,
food production, rural tourism, natural
resources, and advanced manufacturing.
Qualified private, nonprofit and
public (including tribal) intermediary
organizations proposing to carry out
financial and technical assistance
programs will be eligible to receive the
funding. The intermediary will be
required to provide matching funds in
an amount at least equal to the RCDI
grant. The respective minimum and
maximum grant amount per
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
A. Eligible Applicants
1. Qualified private, nonprofit,
including faith-based and community
organizations, in accordance with 7 CFR
part 16, and public (including tribal)
intermediary organizations. Definitions
that describe eligible organizations and
other key terms are listed below.
2. RCDI grantees that have an
outstanding grant over 3 years old, as of
the application due date in this Notice,
will not be eligible to apply for this
round of funding. Grant and matching
funds must be utilized in a timely
manner to ensure that the goals and
objectives of the program are met.
B. Program Definitions
Agency—The Rural Housing Service
(RHS) or its successor.
Beneficiary—Entities or individuals
that receive benefits from assistance
provided by the recipient.
Capacity—The ability of a recipient to
implement housing, community
facilities, or community and economic
development projects.
Federally recognized tribes—Tribal
entities recognized and eligible for
funding and services from the Bureau of
Indian Affairs, based on the current
notice in the Federal Register published
by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Tribally
Designated Housing Entities are eligible
RCDI recipients.
Financial assistance—Funds, not to
exceed $10,000 per award, used by the
intermediary to purchase supplies and
equipment to build the recipient’s
capacity.
Funds—The RCDI grant and matching
money.
Intermediary—A qualified private,
nonprofit (including faith-based and
community organizations), or public
(including tribal) organization that
provides financial and technical
assistance to multiple recipients.
Low-income rural community—An
authority, district, economic
development authority, regional
council, or unit of government
representing an incorporated city, town,
village, county, township, parish, or
borough whose median household
income is at or below 80% of either the
state or national Median Household
Income as measured by the 2000
Census.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Recipient—The entity that receives
the financial and technical assistance
from the Intermediary. The recipient
must be a private, non-profit
community-based housing and
development organization, a lowincome rural community or a federally
recognized Tribe.
Regional collaboration—Multijurisdictional areas typically within a
State, territory, or Federally designated
Tribal land but which can cross State,
territory, or Tribal boundaries. The
Regional Collaboration approach is
intended to combine the resources of
the Agency with those of State and local
governments, educational institutions,
and the private and nonprofit sectors to
implement regional economic and
community development strategies.
Rural and rural area—Any area other
than (i) a city or town that has a
population of greater than 50,000
inhabitants; and (ii) the urbanized area
contiguous and adjacent to such city or
town.
Technical assistance—Skilled help in
improving the recipient’s abilities in the
areas of housing, community facilities,
or community and economic
development.
C. Cost Sharing or Matching
Matching funds—Cash or confirmed
funding commitments. Matching funds
must be at least equal to the grant
amount and committed for a period of
not less than the grant performance
period. These funds can only be used
for eligible RCDI activities. In-kind
contributions such as salaries, donated
time and effort, real and nonexpendable
personal property and goods and
services cannot be used as matching
funds. Grant funds and matching funds
must be used in equal proportions. This
does not mean funds have to be used
equally by line item. The request for
advance or reimbursement and
supporting documentation must show
that RCDI fund usage does not exceed
the cumulative amount of matching
funds used. Grant funds will be
disbursed pursuant to relevant
provisions of 7 CFR parts 3015, 3016,
and 3019, as applicable. Verification of
matching funds must be submitted with
the application.
The intermediary is responsible for
demonstrating that matching funds are
available, and committed for a period of
not less than the grant performance
period to the RCDI proposal. Matching
funds may be provided by the
intermediary or a third party. Other
Federal funds may be used as matching
funds if authorized by statute and the
purpose of the funds is an eligible RCDI
purpose. Matching funds must be used
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
to support the overall purpose of the
RCDI program. RCDI funds will be
disbursed on an advance or
reimbursement basis. Matching funds
cannot be expended prior to execution
of the RCDI Grant Agreement. No
reimbursement will be made for any
funds expended prior to execution of
the RCDI Grant Agreement unless the
intermediary is a non-profit or
educational entity and has requested
and received written Agency approval
of the costs prior to the actual
expenditure. This exception is
applicable for up to 90 days prior to
grant closing and only applies to
grantees that have received written
approval but have not executed the
RCDI Grant Agreement. The Agency
cannot retroactively approve
reimbursement for expenditures prior to
execution of the RCDI Grant Agreement.
D. Other Program Requirements
1. The recipient and beneficiary, but
not the intermediary, must be located in
an eligible rural area. The physical
location of the recipient’s office that
will be receiving the financial and
technical assistance must be in an
eligible rural area. If the recipient is a
low-income community, the median
household income of the area where the
office is located must be at or below 80
percent of the State or national median
household income, whichever is higher.
The applicable Rural Development State
Office can assist in determining the
eligibility of an area. A listing of Rural
Development State Offices is included
in this Notice. A map showing eligible
rural areas can be found at the following
link: https://eligibility.sc.egov.usda.gov/
eligibility/welcome
Action.do?pageAction
=RBSmenu&NavKey=property@13.
2. The recipients must be private
nonprofit, including faith-based
organizations, community-based
housing and development organizations,
low-income rural communities, or
federally recognized tribes based on the
RCDI definitions of these groups.
3. Documentation must be submitted
to verify recipient eligibility. Acceptable
documentation varies depending on the
type of recipient. Private nonprofit, faith
or community-based organizations must
provide a certificate of incorporation
and good standing from the Secretary of
the State of incorporation, or other
similar and valid documentation of
nonprofit status. For low-income rural
community recipients, the Agency
requires evidence that the entity is a
public body and census data verifying
that the median household income of
the community where the office
receiving the financial and technical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
assistance is located is at, or below, 80
percent of the State or national median
household income, whichever is higher.
For Federally recognized tribes, the
Agency needs the page listing their
name from the current Federal Register
list of tribal entities recognized and
eligible for funding services (see the
definition of federally recognized tribes
in this Notice for details on this list). If
a tribe has been federally recognized
since the last list of federally recognized
tribes was published in the Federal
Register, appropriate documentation
from the Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Indian Affairs must be
submitted that legally verifies that
recognition.
4. Individuals cannot be recipients.
5. The intermediary must provide
matching funds at least equal to the
amount of the grant. Verification of
matching funds must be submitted with
the application. Matching funds must be
committed for a period equal to the
grant performance period.
6. The intermediary must provide a
program of financial and technical
assistance to the recipient.
7. The intermediary organization must
have been legally organized for a
minimum of 3 years and have at least
3 years prior experience working with
private nonprofit community-based
housing and development organizations,
low-income rural communities, or tribal
organizations in the areas of housing,
community facilities, or community and
economic development.
8. Proposals must be structured to
utilize the grant funds within 3 years
from the date of the award.
9. Each applicant, whether singularly
or jointly, may submit one application
for the traditional RCDI funds and one
application for the Jobs Accelerator
funds under this NOFA. This restriction
does not preclude the applicant from
providing matching funds for other
applications.
10. Recipients can benefit from more
than one RCDI application; however,
after grant selections are made, the
recipient can only benefit from multiple
RCDI grants if the type of financial and
technical assistance the recipient will
receive is not duplicative. Funding for
services to the same recipients must
have separate and identifiable accounts
for compliance purposes.
11. The intermediary and the
recipient cannot be the same entity. The
recipient can be a related entity to the
intermediary, if it meets the definition
of a recipient, provided the relationship
does not create a conflict of interest that
cannot be resolved to Rural
Development’s satisfaction.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16521
12. A nonprofit recipient must
provide evidence that it is a valid
nonprofit when the intermediary
applies for the RCDI grant.
Organizations with pending requests for
nonprofit designations are not eligible.
13. If the recipient is a low-income
rural community, identify the unit of
government to which the financial and
technical assistance will be provided,
e.g., town council or village board. The
financial and technical assistance must
be provided to the organized unit of
government representing that
community, not the community at large.
14. If a grantee has an outstanding
RCDI grant over 3 years old, as of the
application due date in this Notice, it is
not eligible to apply for this round of
funding.
15. The indirect cost category in the
project budget should be used only
when a grant applicant has a federally
negotiated indirect cost rate. A copy of
the current rate agreement must be
provided with the application.
16. Grant applicants must obtain a
Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number and
register in the Central Contractor
Registration (CCR) prior to submitting a
pre-application pursuant to 2 CFR
25.200(b). In addition, an entity
applicant must maintain registration in
the CCR database at all times during
which it has an active Federal award or
an application or plan under
construction by the Agency. Similarly,
all recipients of Federal financial
assistance are required to report
information about first-tier sub-awards
and executive compensation in
accordance to 2 CFR part 170. So long
as an entity applicant does not have an
exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b), the
applicant must have the necessary
processes and systems in place to
comply with the reporting requirements
should the applicant receive funding.
See 2 CFR 170.200(b).
Eligible Fund Uses
Fund uses must be consistent with the
RCDI purpose. A nonexclusive list of
eligible grant uses includes the
following:
1. Provide technical assistance to
develop recipients’ capacity and ability
to undertake projects related to housing,
community facilities, or community and
economic development, i.e., the
intermediary hires a staff person to
provide technical assistance to the
recipient or the recipient hires a staff
person, under the supervision of the
intermediary, to carry out the technical
assistance provided by the intermediary.
2. Develop the capacity of recipients
to conduct community development
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
16522
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
programs, e.g., homeownership
education or training for business
entrepreneurs.
3. Develop the capacity of recipients
to conduct development initiatives, e.g.,
programs that support micro-enterprise
and sustainable development.
4. Develop the capacity of recipients
to increase their leveraging ability and
access to alternative funding sources by
providing training and staffing.
5. Develop the capacity of recipients
to provide the technical assistance
component for essential community
facilities projects.
6. Assist recipients in completing predevelopment requirements for housing,
community facilities, or community and
economic development projects by
providing resources for professional
services, e.g., architectural, engineering,
or legal.
7. Improve recipient’s organizational
capacity by providing training and
resource material on developing
strategic plans, board operations,
management, financial systems, and
information technology.
8. Purchase of computers, software,
and printers, limited to $10,000 per
award, at the recipient level when
directly related to the technical
assistance program being undertaken by
the intermediary.
9. Provide funds to recipients for
training-related travel costs and training
expenses related to RCDI.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Ineligible Fund Uses
1. Pass-through grants, capacity
grants, and any funds provided to the
recipient in a lump sum that are not
reimbursements.
2. Funding a revolving loan fund
(RLF).
3. Construction (in any form).
4. Salaries for positions involved in
construction, renovations,
rehabilitation, and any oversight of
these types of activities.
5. Intermediary preparation of
strategic plans for recipients.
6. Funding prostitution, gambling, or
any illegal activities.
7. Grants to individuals.
8. Funding a grant where there may be
a conflict of interest, or an appearance
of a conflict of interest, involving any
action by the Agency.
9. Paying obligations incurred before
the beginning date without prior Agency
approval or after the ending date of the
grant agreement.
10. Purchasing real estate.
11. Improvement or renovation of the
grantee’s, or recipient’s office space or
for the repair or maintenance of
privately owned vehicles.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
12. Any other purpose prohibited in
7 CFR parts 3015, 3016, and 3019, as
applicable.
13. Using funds for recipient’s general
operating costs.
14. Using grant or matching funds for
Individual Development Accounts.
15. Purchasing vehicles.
Program Examples and Restrictions
The purpose of this initiative is to
develop or increase the recipient’s
capacity through a program of financial
and technical assistance to perform in
the areas of housing, community
facilities, or community and economic
development. Strengthening the
recipient’s capacity in these areas will
benefit the communities they serve. The
RCDI structure requires the
intermediary (grantee) to provide a
program of financial and technical
assistance to recipients. The recipients
will, in turn, provide programs to their
communities (beneficiaries). The
following are examples of eligible and
ineligible purposes under the RCDI
program. (These examples are
illustrative and are not meant to limit
the activities proposed in the
application. Activities that meet the
objectives of the RCDI program will be
considered eligible.)
1. The intermediary must work
directly with the recipient, not the
ultimate beneficiaries. As an example:
The intermediary provides training to
the recipient on how to conduct
homeownership education classes. The
recipient then provides ongoing
homeownership education to the
residents of the community—the
ultimate beneficiaries. This ‘‘train the
trainer’’ concept fully meets the intent
of this initiative. The intermediary is
providing technical assistance that will
build the recipient’s capacity by
enabling them to conduct
homeownership education classes for
the public. This is an eligible purpose.
However, if the intermediary directly
provided homeownership education
classes to individuals in the recipient’s
service area, this would not be an
eligible purpose because the recipient
would be bypassed.
2. If the intermediary is working with
a low-income community as the
recipient, the intermediary must
provide the technical assistance to the
entity that represents the low-income
community and is identified in the
application. Examples of entities
representing a low-income community
are a village board or a town council. If
the intermediary provides technical
assistance to the Board of the lowincome community on how to establish
a cooperative, this would be an eligible
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
purpose. However, if the intermediary
works directly with individuals from
the community to establish the
cooperative, this is not an eligible
purpose. The recipient’s capacity is
built by learning skills that will enable
them to support sustainable economic
development in their communities on
an ongoing basis.
3. The intermediary may provide
technical assistance to the recipient on
how to create and operate a revolving
loan fund. The intermediary may not
monitor or operate the revolving loan
fund. RCDI funds, including matching
funds, cannot be used to fund revolving
loan funds.
4. The intermediary may work with
recipients in building their capacity to
provide planning and leadership
development training. The recipients of
this training would be expected to
assume leadership roles in the
development and execution of regional
strategic plans. The intermediary would
work with multiple recipients in
helping communities recognize their
connections to the greater regional and
national economies.
5. The intermediary could provide
training and technical assistance to the
recipients on developing emergency
shelter and feeding, short-term housing,
search and rescue, and environmental
accident, prevention, and cleanup
program plans. For longer term disaster
and economic crisis responses, the
intermediary could work with the
recipients to develop job placement and
training programs, and develop
coordinated transit systems for
displaced workers.
Part IV—Application and Submission
Information for the Traditional RCDI
Program
A. Address To Request Application
Package
Entities wishing to apply for
assistance may download the
application documents and
requirements delineated in this Notice
from the RCDI Web site: https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rhs/rcdi.
Application information for electronic
submissions may be found at https://
www.grants.gov. Applicants may also
request paper application packages from
the Rural Development office in their
state. A list of Rural Development State
offices is included in this Notice.
B. Content and Form of Application
Submission
If the applicant is ineligible or the
application is incomplete, the Agency
will inform the applicant in writing of
the decision, reasons therefore, and its
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
appeal rights and no further evaluation
of the application will occur.
A complete application for RCDI
funds must include the following:
1. A summary page, double-spaced
between items, listing the following:
(This information should not be
presented in narrative form.)
a. Applicant’s name,
b. Applicant’s address,
c. Applicant’s telephone number,
d. Name of applicant’s contact person
and telephone number,
e. Applicant’s fax number,
f. County where applicant is located,
g. Congressional district number
where applicant is located,
h. Amount of grant request, and
i. Number of recipients
2. A detailed Table of Contents
containing page numbers for each
component of the application.
3. A project overview, no longer than
five pages, including the following
items, which will also be addressed
separately and in detail under ‘‘Building
Capacity’’ of the ‘‘Evaluation Criteria.’’
a. The type of technical assistance to
be provided to the recipients and how
it will be implemented.
b. How the capacity and ability of the
recipients will be improved.
c. The overall goals to be
accomplished.
d. The benchmarks to be used to
measure the success of the program.
Benchmarks should be specific and
quantifiable.
4. Organizational documents, such as
a certificate of incorporation and a
current good standing certification from
the Secretary of State where the
applicant is incorporated and other
similar and valid documentation of nonprofit status, from the intermediary that
confirms it has been legally organized
for a minimum of 3 years as the
applicant entity.
5. Verification of source and amount
of matching funds, i.e., a copy of a bank
statement if matching funds are in cash
or a copy of the confirmed funding
commitment from the funding source.
The verification must show that
matching funds are available for the
duration of the grant performance
period. The verification of matching
funds must be submitted with the
application or the application will be
considered incomplete.
The applicant will be contacted by the
Agency prior to grant award to verify
that the matching funds provided with
the application continue to be available.
The applicant will have 15 working
days from the date contacted to submit
verification that matching funds
continue to be available. If the applicant
is unable to provide the verification
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
within that timeframe, the application
will be considered ineligible. The
applicant must maintain bank
statements on file or other
documentation for a period of at least
three years after grant closing except
that the records shall be retained
beyond the three-year period if audit
findings have not been resolved.
6. The following information for each
recipient:
a. Recipient’s entity name,
b. Complete address (mailing and
physical location, if different),
c. County where located,
d. Number of Congressional district
where recipient is located,
e. Contact person’s name and
telephone number, and
f. Form RD 400–4, ‘‘Assurance
Agreement.’’ If the Form RD 400–4 is
not submitted for a recipient, the
recipient will be considered ineligible.
No information pertaining to that
recipient will be included in the income
or population scoring criteria and the
requested funding may be adjusted due
to the deletion of the recipient.
7. Submit evidence that each recipient
entity is eligible:
a. Nonprofits—provide a current valid
letter confirming non-profit status from
the Secretary of the State of
incorporation or the IRS, a current good
standing certification from the Secretary
of the State of incorporation, or other
valid documentation of nonprofit status
of each recipient.
b. Low-income rural community—
provide evidence the entity is a public
body, and a copy of the 2000 census
data to verify the population, and
evidence that the median household
income is at, or below, 80 percent of
either the State or the national income.
We will only accept data and printouts
from https://www.census.gov. The
specific instructions to retrieve data
from this site are detailed under the
‘‘Evaluation Criteria’’ for ‘‘Population’’
and ‘‘Income.’’
c. Federally recognized tribes—
provide the page listing their name from
the Federal Register list of tribal entities
published by the Bureau of Indian
Affairs on October 1, 2010 (75 FR
60810) or a subsequent updated list or
supplement in the Federal Register. If a
tribe has been federally recognized since
the last list of federally recognized tribes
was published in the Federal Register,
appropriate documentation from the
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Indian Affairs must be submitted that
legally verifies that recognition.
8. Each of the ’’Evaluation Criteria’’
must be addressed specifically and
individually by category. Present these
criteria in narrative form.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16523
Documentation must be limited to three
pages per criterion. The ‘‘Population’’
and ‘‘Income’’ criterions for recipient
locations can be provided in the form of
a list; however, the source of the data
must be included on the page(s).
9. A timeline identifying specific
activities and proposed dates for
completion.
10. A detailed project budget that
includes the RCDI grant amount and
matching funds. This should be a lineitem budget, by category. Categories
such as salaries, administrative, other,
and indirect costs that pertain to the
proposed project must be clearly
defined. Supporting documentation
listing the components of these
categories must be included. The budget
should be dated: year 1, year 2, year 3,
as applicable.
11. Form SF–424, ‘‘Application for
Federal Assistance.’’ (Do not complete
Form SF–424A, ‘‘Budget Information.’’
A separate line-item budget should be
presented as described in No. 10 of this
section.)
12. Form SF–424B, ‘‘Assurances—
Non-Construction Programs.’’
13. Form AD–1047, ‘‘Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and
Other Responsibility Matters—Primary
Covered Transactions.’’
14. Form AD–1048, ‘‘Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—
Lower Tier Covered Transactions.’’
15. Form AD–1049, ‘‘Certification
Regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements.’’
16. Certification of Non-Lobbying
Activities.
17. Standard Form LLL, ‘‘Disclosure
of Lobbying Activities,’’ if applicable.
18. Form RD 400–4, ‘‘Assurance
Agreement,’’ for the applicant.
19. Identify and report any association
or relationship with Rural Development
employees.
20. For grants, the applicant’s Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering Systems (DUNS) number
and registration in the Central
Contractor Registration (CCR) database
in accordance with 2 CFR part 25. As
required by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), all grant
applications must provide a DUNS
number when applying for Federal
grants, on or after October 1, 2003.
Organizations can receive a DUNS
number at no cost by calling the
dedicated toll-free number at 1–866–
705–5711 or via Internet at
http:www.dnb.com/us/. Additional
information concerning this
requirement can be obtained on the
Grants.gov Web Site at https://
www.grants.gov. Similarly, applicants
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
16524
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
may register for the CCR at https://
uscontractingregistration.com or by
calling 1–877–252–2700.
The required forms and certifications
can be downloaded from the RCDI Web
site at: https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rhs/
rcdi.
C. Other Submission Information
Survey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity for Applicants, OMB No.
1894–0010 Exp. 05/31/2012 (applies
only to non-profit applicants only—
submission is optional).
The original application package must
be submitted to the Rural Development
State Office where the applicant’s
headquarters is located. A listing of
Rural Development State Offices is
included in this Notice. Applications
will not be accepted via FAX or
electronic mail.
Applicants may file an electronic
application at https://www.grants.gov.
Grants.gov contains full instructions on
all required passwords, credentialing,
and software. Follow the instructions at
Grants.gov for registering and
submitting an electronic application.
If a system problem or technical
difficulty occurs with an electronic
application, please use the customer
support resources available at the
Grants.gov Web site.
Technical difficulties submitting an
application through Grants.gov will not
be a reason to extend the application
deadline. If an application is unable to
be submitted through Grants.gov, a
paper application must be received in
the appropriate Rural Development
State Office by the deadline noted
previously.
First time Grants.gov users should
carefully read and follow the
registration steps listed on the Web site.
These steps need to be initiated early in
the application process to avoid delays
in submitting your application online.
In order to register with the Central
Contractor Registry (CCR), your
organization will need a DUNS number.
Be sure to complete the Marketing
Partner ID (MPID) and Electronic
Business Primary Point of Contact fields
during the CCR registration process.
These are mandatory fields that are
required when submitting grant
applications through Grants.gov.
Additional application instructions for
submitting an electronic application can
be found by selecting this funding
opportunity on Grants.gov.
The deadline for receipt of an
application is May 9 by 4 p.m. local
time. The application deadline date and
time are firm and apply to submission
of the original application to the Rural
Development State Office where the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
applicant’s headquarters is located. The
Agency will not consider any
application received after the deadline.
A listing of Rural Development State
Offices, their addresses, telephone
numbers, and contact person is
provided elsewhere in this Notice.
Applicants intending to mail
applications must allow sufficient time
to permit delivery on or before the
closing deadline date and time.
Acceptance by the United States Postal
Service or private mailer does not
constitute delivery. Fax, electronic mail
or postage due applications will not be
accepted.
D. Funding Restrictions
Meeting expenses. In accordance with
31 U.S.C. 1345, ‘‘Expenses of Meetings,’’
appropriations may not be used for
travel, transportation, and subsistence
expenses for a meeting. RCDI grant
funds cannot be used for these meetingrelated expenses. Matching funds may
be used to pay for these expenses. RCDI
funds may be used to pay for a speaker
as part of a program, equipment to
facilitate the program, and the actual
room that will house the meeting. RCDI
funds can be used for travel,
transportation, or subsistence expenses
for program-related training and
technical assistance purposes. Any
training not delineated in the
application must be approved by the
Agency to verify compliance with 31
U.S.C. 1345. Travel and per diem
expenses will be similar to those paid to
Agency employees. Rates are based
upon location. Rate information can be
obtained from the applicable Rural
Development State Office.
Grantees and recipients will be
restricted to traveling coach class on
common carrier airlines. When lodging
is not available at the government rate,
grantees and recipients may exceed the
Government rate for lodging by a
maximum of 20 percent. Meals and
incidental expenses will be reimbursed
at the same rate used by Agency
employees. Mileage and gas
reimbursement will be the same rate
used by Agency employees. This rate
may be obtained from the applicable
Rural Development State Office.
Part V—Application Review
Information for the Traditional RCDI
Program
A. Evaluation Criteria
Applications will be evaluated using
the following criteria and weights:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Building Capacity—Maximum 60
Points
The applicant must demonstrate how
they will improve the recipients’
capacity, through a program of financial
and technical assistance, as it relates to
the RCDI purposes. Capacity-building
financial and technical assistance
should provide new functions to the
recipients or expand existing functions
that will enable the recipients to
undertake projects in the areas of
housing, community facilities, or
community and economic development
that will benefit the community. The
program of financial and technical
assistance provided, its delivery, and
the measurability of the program’s
effectiveness will determine the merit of
the application. All applications will be
competitively ranked with the
applications providing the most
improvement in capacity development
and measurable activities being ranked
the highest. Capacity-building financial
and technical assistance may include,
but is not limited to: training to conduct
community development programs, e.g.,
homeownership education, or the
establishment of minority business
entrepreneurs, cooperatives, or microenterprises; organizational
development, e.g., assistance to develop
or improve board operations,
management, and financial systems;
instruction on how to develop and
implement a strategic plan; instruction
on how to access alternative funding
sources to increase leveraging
opportunities; staffing, e.g., hiring a
person at intermediary or recipient level
to provide technical assistance to
recipients.
a. The narrative response must:
i. Describe the nature of financial and
technical assistance to be provided to
the recipients and the activities that will
be conducted to deliver the technical
assistance;
ii. Explain how financial and
technical assistance will develop or
increase the recipient’s capacity.
Indicate whether a new function is
being developed or if existing functions
are being expanded or performed more
effectively;
iii. Identify which RCDI purpose areas
will be addressed with this assistance:
housing, community facilities, or
community and economic development;
and
iv. Describe how the results of the
technical assistance will be measured.
What benchmarks will be used to
measure effectiveness? Benchmarks
should be specific and quantifiable.
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
b. The maximum 60 points for this
criterion will be broken down as
follows:
i. Type of financial and technical
assistance and implementation
activities. 35 points.
ii. An explanation of how financial
and technical assistance will develop
capacity. 10 points.
iii. Identification of the RCDI purpose.
5 points.
iv. Measurement of outcomes. 10
points.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Expertise—Maximum 30 Points
The applicant must demonstrate that
it has conducted programs of financial
and technical assistance and achieved
measurable results in the areas of
housing, community facilities, or
community and economic development
in rural areas. Provide the name, contact
information, and the type and amount of
the financial and technical assistance
the applicant organization has provided
to the following for the last 3 years:
a. Nonprofit organizations in rural
areas.
b. Low-income communities in rural
areas, (also include the type of entity,
e.g., city government, town council, or
village board).
c. Federally recognized tribes or any
other culturally diverse organizations.
4. Income—Maximum 30 Points
The average of the median household
income for the communities where the
recipients are physically located will
determine the points awarded. The
physical address, not mailing address,
for each recipient must be used for this
criterion. Applicants may compare the
average recipient median household
income to the State median household
income or the national median
household income, whichever yields the
most points. The national median
household income to be used is $41,994.
The applicant must submit the income
data in the form of a printout of the
applicable information from the
following Web site to verify the income
for each recipient. The data being used
is from the 2000 census. The data can
be accessed on the Internet at https://
www.census.gov; click on ‘‘American
FactFinder’’ from the left menu; click on
‘‘Fact Sheet’’ from the left menu; at the
right, fill in one or more fields and click
‘‘Go’’; the name and income data for
each recipient location must be listed in
this section. Points will be awarded as
follows:
16525
The proposed grant amount and
matching funds should be utilized to
maximize capacity building at the
recipient level. 15 points.
d. The proposal fits the objectives for
which applications were invited. 15
points.
6. Technical Assistance for the
Development of Renewable Energy
Systems and Energy Efficiency
Improvements—Maximum 20 Points
The applicant must demonstrate how
they will improve the recipients’
capacity to carry out activities related to
the development of renewable energy
systems and energy efficiency
improvements for housing, community
facilities, or community and economic
development.
7. Regional Collaboration
Applications—Maximum 20 Points
The Agency encourages applications
that promote substantive economic
growth, including job creation, as well
as specifically addressing the
circumstances of those sectors within
the region that have fewer prospects and
the greatest need for improved
economic opportunity.
Average recipient median
Scoring
A Regional Collaboration project
income
(points)
should implement goals, objectives or
actions identified in a Regional Strategic
Less than 60 percent of state or
3. Population—Maximum 30 Points
Plan which addresses priorities
national median household income .......................................
30 specified at a regional scale.
Population is based on the average
From 60 to 70 percent of state
Applications should demonstrate:
population from the 2000 census data
or national median household
a. Clear leadership at the Intermediary
for the communities in which the
income .....................................
20 level in organizing and coordinating a
recipients are located. The physical
Greater than 70 to 80 percent of
regional initiative;
address, not mailing address, for each
state or national median
b. Evidence that the Recipient’s region
recipient must be used for this criterion.
household income ...................
10
has a common economic basis that
Community is defined for scoring
In excess of 80 percent of state
supports the likelihood of success in
purposes as a city, town, village, county,
or national median household
income .....................................
0 implementing its strategy;
parish, borough, or census-designated
c. Evidence that technical assistance
place where the recipient’s office is
will be provided that will increase the
physically located. The applicant must
5. Soundness of Approach—Maximum
Recipient’s capacity to assess their
submit the census data from the
50 Points
circumstance, determine a long term
following Web site in the form of a
The applicant can receive up to 50
sustainable vision for the region, and
printout of the applicable ‘‘Fact Sheet’’
points for soundness of approach. The
implement a comprehensive strategic
to verify the population figures used for
overall proposal will be considered
plan, including identifying performance
each recipient. The data can be accessed
under this criterion. Applicants must
measures and establishing a system to
on the Internet at https://
list the page numbers in the application collect the data to allow assessment of
www.census.gov; click on ‘‘American
that address these factors.
those performance measures.
FactFinder’’ from the left menu; click on
The maximum 50 points for this
‘‘Fact Sheet’’ from the left menu; at the
8. Local Investment Points—Maximum
right, fill in one or more fields and click criterion will be broken down as
20 Points
follows:
‘‘Go’’; the name and population data for
a. The ability to provide the proposed
Intermediaries must be physically
each recipient location must be listed in
financial and technical assistance based located in an eligible rural community
this section. The average population of
on prior accomplishments has been
and must include evidence of
the recipient locations will be used and
demonstrated. 10 Points.
investment in the community. The
will be scored as follows:
b. The proposed financial and
intent is to ensure that RCDI funds are
technical assistance program is clearly
expended in the rural community.
Scoring
Population
stated and the applicant has defined
(points)
how this proposal will be implemented. 9. State Director’s Points Based on
Project Merit—Maximum 20 Points
5,000 or less ...............................
30 The plan for implementation is viable.
5,001 to 10,000 ..........................
20 10 Points.
This criterion does not have to be
10,001 to 20,000 ........................
10
c. Cost effectiveness will be evaluated addressed by the applicant. Up to 20
20,001 to 50,000 ........................
5
based on the budget in the application.
points may be awarded by the Rural
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
16526
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
7. Applicants failed to address the
‘‘Evaluation Criteria.’’
8. The purpose of the proposal did not
qualify as an eligible RCDI purpose.
9. Inappropriate use of funds (e.g.,
construction or renovations).
10. The applicant proposed providing
financial and technical assistance
directly to individuals.
11. The application package not
received by closing date and time.
10. Proportional Distribution Points—20
Points
This criterion does not have to be
addressed by the applicant. After
applications have been evaluated and
awarded points under the first 9 criteria,
the Agency may award 20 points per
application to promote an even
distribution of grant awards between the
ranges of $50,000 to $300,000.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Development State Director. Points may
be awarded to more than one
application per state or jurisdiction. The
total points awarded under this
criterion, to all applications, will not
exceed 20. Assignment of points will
include a written justification and be
tied to and awarded based on how
closely they align with the Rural
Development State Office’s strategic
plan.
Part VI—Rural Jobs Accelerator and
Innovation Challenge Application
Process
B. Review and Selection Process
Rating and ranking. Applications will
be rated and ranked on a national basis
by a review panel based on the
‘‘Evaluation Criteria’’ contained in this
Notice. If there is a tied score after the
applications have been rated and
ranked, the tie will be resolved by
reviewing the scores for ‘‘Building
Capacity’’ and the applicant with the
highest score in that category will
receive a higher ranking. If the scores for
‘‘Building Capacity’’ are the same, the
scores will be compared for the next
criterion, in sequential order, until one
highest score can be determined.
Initial screening. The Agency will
screen each application to determine
eligibility during the period
immediately following the application
deadline. Listed below are examples of
reasons for rejection from previous
funding rounds. The following reasons
for rejection are not all inclusive;
however, they represent the majority of
the applications previously rejected.
1. Recipients were not located in
eligible rural areas based on the
definition in this Notice.
2. Applicants failed to provide
evidence of recipient’s status, i.e.,
documentation supporting nonprofit
evidence of organization.
3. Applicants failed to provide
evidence of committed matching funds
or matching funds were not committed
for a period at least equal to the grant
performance period.
4. Application did not follow the
RCDI structure with an intermediary
and recipients.
5. Recipients were not identified in
the application.
6. Intermediary did not provide
evidence it had been incorporated for at
least 3 years as the applicant entity.
Required Application Forms and
Content
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
An application for ‘‘Rural Jobs and
Innovation Accelerator Challenge’’
funds must be submitted to USDA and
EDA by an organization or a team of
organizations that is individually or
collectively eligible to receive funding
from USDA and EDA.
To be considered complete, an
application package must consist of:
(1) Required forms as discussed
below;
(2) Project Narrative; and
(3) Addenda to the Project Narrative.
Applications that do not contain all
required forms listed below, or that fail
to adhere to the instructions in this
Notice, will be considered nonresponsive and will not be considered
for funding. Additional application
materials not requested under this
Notice will not be reviewed or
evaluated.
Applicants are advised to carefully
read the instructions contained in this
Notice and in all forms contained in the
application package. It is the sole
responsibility of each applicant to
ensure that a complete application
package is received.
Required Forms
All applicants are required to submit
the following forms at the time of
application. The forms should be
uploaded as separate portable document
format (PDF) files. Forms are available
in the application package at
www.grants.gov or on the Rural Jobs
Accelerator Web site under ‘application
submission information’.
Each USDA applicant must submit
the following forms.
• Form SF–424—Application for
Federal Assistance for the applicant
• Form SF–424A—Budget InformationNon-Construction Programs for the
applicant
• Form SF–424B—Assurances—NonConstruction Programs for the
applicant
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Form CD–511—Certification
Regarding Lobbying for the USDA and
EDA applicant
• Form RD–400–4—Assurance
Agreement, for the applicant and each
RCDI Recipient
• Form AD–1047—Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
and Other Responsibility Matters—
Primary Covered Transactions
• Form AD–1048—Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility, and Voluntary
Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered
Transactions
• Form AD–1049—Certification
Regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements
• Identity and report any association or
relationship with Rural Development
employees.
• Survey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity for Applicants, OMB No.
1894–0010 Exp. 05/13/2012 (applies
only to non-profit applicants—
submission is optional)
• Form SF–LLL—Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities, if applicable
Project Description
The Project Description must
demonstrate the applicant’s capability
to implement the proposed activities in
accordance with the requirements of
this NOFA. The Project Description
must demonstrate how each scope of
work (individually funded by each
Funding Agency) is integrated into an
overarching project.
The full Project Description must
include the following components:
Executive Summary:
Not to exceed two pages, the
Executive Summary will serve as a
summary of the proposed project and
may be shared publicly in the form
originally submitted; therefore,
applicants should not include
proprietary, confidential commercial/
business, and personally identifiable
information. The Executive Summary
must include the following sections: (a)
The project name; (b) the organizations
composing the Applicant Team; (c) the
identified region and cluster; (d) a
summary of the integrated project and
project objectives; (e) a brief description
of the scopes of work to be funded by
each funding source and the associated
performance measures; and (f) a
summary of how the capacity of the
recipients will be improved and the
regional strength will be increased.
Project Narrative:
The Project Narrative should be a
detailed description of all activities that
will be undertaken by all sources of
funds requested under this solicitation.
Within the Project Narrative, applicants
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
should address all the evaluation
criteria, as outlined in section VI.A:
1. Region and Cluster of Focus;
2. Integrated Project Concept/
Overview;
3. Building Community and Regional
Capacity (USDA scope of work);
4. Developing Regional Links (EDA
scope of work);
5. ARC or DRA scope of work (only
applicable to applicants seeking funding
from ARC or DRA);
6. Project Impact and Measurable
Outcomes; and
7. Soundness of Approach.
The length of the Project Narrative is
limited to 25 double-spaced, 8.5 x 11
inch pages with 12-point font and 1inch margins. Applicants may include a
map delineating the region at the end of
the Project Narrative, which will not
count towards the 25 page limit. Any
Project Narrative text beyond the
specified page limit will not be read.
Applicants must number the pages of
the Project Narrative, beginning with
page number 1. The Project Narrative
should be submitted as one PDF file,
and only one Project Narrative should
be submitted per application. Note: the
page limit described in this section may
be increased to 30 pages if the Applicant
Team is also seeking funding from ARC
or DRA.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Integrated Work Plan
Applicants must input details of
proposed activities under each scope of
work from the Project Narrative, as well
as expected/estimated impacts of the
activities, into an Integrated Work Plan.
Budget Description
A separate budget narrative must be
created and submitted to support the
scope of work for each Funding Agency,
and each narrative must provide a
description of costs associated with
each line item on each Form SF–424A
over the project period. Supporting
documentation listing the components
of these categories must be included.
The budget should be dated: Year 1,
Year 2, Year 3, as applicable. The
budget narrative should include a
personnel plan listing all positions that
will be charged to the Federal and nonFederal portion of the budget for each
year of the applicable project period.
The personnel plan must include the
position titles, salaries, percentage of
time dedicated to the project, and
amount of salary charged to the project
for each staff member assigned to the
project. The sum of all salaries charged
to the project must equal the amount on
the ‘‘Personnel’’ budget line item on
Form SF–424A. The personnel plan
should provide a description of how the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
16527
documentation of non-profit status,
from the intermediary that confirms it
has been legally organized for a
minimum of 3 years as the applicant
entity.
Addenda to the Project Description
• Recipient Information: Applicants
The applicant must also submit the
must provide the following information
following required addenda to the
for each recipient. Please combine into
Project Description in PDF file.
a single PDF file.
The required addenda to the Project
1. A summary page, double-spaced
Description are:
between items, listing the following for
• Resumes of Key Personnel (by
each recipient (this information should
Funding Agency): Applicants must
not be presented in narrative form):
provide resumes for key personnel staff
a. Recipient’s entity name;
which generally should not exceed two
b. Complete address (mailing and
pages in length (per resume). Applicants physical location, if different);
also should provide a 2 page summary
c. County where located;
description of all personnel (performing
d. Number of Congressional district
for the applicant) and contractors
where recipient is located; and
named in the application. Resumes
e. Contact person’s name and
should be uploaded as one PDF file.
telephone number.
• Verification of Matching Funds
2. Submit evidence that each recipient
Æ Verification of source and amount
entity is eligible:
of matching funds: Each USDA
a. Nonprofits—provide a current valid
applicant must provide verification of
letter confirming non-profit status from
source and amount of matching funds,
the Secretary of the State of
i.e., a copy of a bank statement if
incorporation or the IRS, a current good
matching funds are in cash or a copy of
standing certification from the Secretary
the confirmed funding commitment
of the State of incorporation, or other
from the funding source. The
valid documentation of nonprofit status
verification must show that matching
of each recipient.
funds are available for the duration of
b. Low-income rural community—
the grant performance period. The
provide evidence the entity is a public
verification of matching funds must be
body, and a copy of the most recent
submitted with the application or the
available census data to verify the
application will be considered
population, and evidence that the
incomplete.
median household income is at, or
Applicant Team Written Agreement: If below, 80 percent of the national
the USDA Applicant is applying for
median household income. We will
funds under this Notice in partnership
only accept data and printouts from
with and EDA applicant, the Applicant
https://www.census.gov. The specific
Team must provide a copy of the
instructions to retrieve data from this
written agreement signed by each team
site are detailed under the ‘‘Evaluation
member that reflects a binding
Criteria’’ for ‘‘Population’’ and
commitment to undertake the proposed
‘‘Income.’’
project, the respective scopes of work,
c. Federally recognized tribes—
and perform the roles and
provide the page listing their name from
responsibilities identified in the Project the Federal Register list of tribal entities
Narrative. The Agreement must include published by the Bureau of Indian
the project title and list each applicant
Affairs on October 1, 2010 (75 FR
and the source of funds they are
60810) or a subsequent updated list or
applying for.
supplement in the Federal Register. If a
• Facilities and Administrative or
tribe has been federally recognized since
Indirect Cost Rate Agreement
the last list of federally recognized tribes
Æ The indirect cost category in the
was published in the Federal Register,
project budget should be used only
appropriate documentation from the
when a grant applicant has a federally
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
negotiated indirect cost rate. A copy of
Indian Affairs must be submitted that
the current rate agreement must be
legally verifies that recognition.
provided with the application.
• Non-profit organizations: NonPart VII—Application Review Process
profit organizations applying for
for the Rural Jobs Accelerator
funding must submit the following,
Challenge
addition to all items listed above.
Evaluation Criteria
Æ Organization documents, such as a
Applications will be evaluated based
certificate of incorporation and a current
on their ability to satisfy the following
good standing certification from the
Secretary of State where the applicant is core evaluation criteria, with each
incorporated and other similar and valid criterion assigned the points indicated.
personnel will carry out the proposed
plan, including the adequacy and
previous performance of the proposed
team to carry out project activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
16528
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Region and Cluster of Focus (15
Points)
The applicant must describe the
region of focus (see page 4) for which
the funding is requested, including the
economics, clusters, and the networks
and assets that contribute to the region’s
competitiveness and potential for
growth.
The narrative response must:
• Clearly describe the geographic
region of the proposed project. Regions
may be single or multi-jurisdictional
areas. Applicants have the flexibility to
define their region based on quantitative
and qualitative information about where
and how the cluster targeted for
development operates.1 The region
description should include the location
of project recipients for the Building
Community and Regional Capacity
activity. Applicants should provide
information about areas and/or sectors
of economic distress.
• Present a compelling description of
the economics of the region and the
specific cluster that will be targeted by
the proposed project. This should
demonstrate that the region possesses
unique assets to support the cluster and
has a competitive advantage in the
identified industry and identify any
specific economic needs and
opportunities for growth. Applicants
should include evidence of a
concentration of firms in the identified
industry sector, available industryspecific infrastructure that support the
cluster, and clear leadership at the
regional level in organizing and
coordinating a region-wide initiative.
Æ Fully describe existing regional
partnerships that directly engaged in
supporting the targeted cluster,
including a discussion of the extent of
participation and effectiveness:
Æ Private sector leadership and
significant participation in cluster
activities;
Æ Any and all cluster intermediary
organization, such as an economic
development organization, workforce
development board, business incubator
or accelerator, chamber of commerce, or
a university-based consortium;
Æ Universities, federally funded labs,
or privately funded research and
development centers;
Æ Federally funded program or
center, such as a Manufacturing
Extension Partnership Center (MEP),
Small Business Development Center,
and Preferred Sustainability Status
1 Regions can be non-contiguous (e.g., cluster
‘‘anchor’’ in one region with networked assets such
as research partnerships with federal labs or supply
chain linkages in other regions).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
holders within the Partnership for
Sustainable Communities;
Æ Venture development
organizations, venture capital firms,
revolving loan funders, angel
investment groups, community lenders,
community development financial
institutions, and other institutions
focused on expanding access to capital;
Æ Local and municipal governments,
workforce development entities,
communities colleges, and communitybased organizations; and
Æ Private foundations focused on
economic or community development,
science, business, and innovation.
2. Integrated Project Concept (10 Points)
Applicants must provide an
Integrated Project Concept, which is a
narrative summary that describes the
proposed project with a maximum of 5
pages.
The narrative response must:
a. Present how the applicant intends
to leverage and utilize multiple
resources to meet project objectives,
address identified needs and capitalize
on opportunities;
b. Clearly express how the proposed
scopes of work will complement each
other in accelerating competitiveness in
rural regions;
c. Describe how the project will
promote substantive economic growth,
including job creation.
Note: Applicants requesting ARC or DRA
funds must also include or incorporate the
proposed ARC or DRA scopes of work in
their Integrated Project Concept.
3. Building Community and Regional
Capacity (20 Points)
The applicant must demonstrate how
they will apply USDA funds to improve
the recipients’ capacity, through a
program of financial and technical
assistance, as it related to the RCDI
purposes. Capacity-building financial
and technical assistance should provide
new functions to the recipients or
expand existing functions that will
enable the recipients to undertake
projects in the areas of housing,
community facilities, or community and
economic development that will benefit
the community. The proposed program
of financial and technical assistance
provided, its delivery, and the
measurability of its effectiveness will
determine the merit of the application.
Capacity-building financial and
technical assistance may include:
Training to conduct community
development programs, e.g., the
establishment of minority business
entrepreneurs, cooperatives, or microenterprises; organizational
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
development, e.g., assistance to develop
or improve board operations,
management, and financial systems;
instruction on how to develop and
implement a strategic plan; instruction
on how to access alternative funding
sources to increase leveraging
opportunities; staffing, e.g., hiring a
person at intermediary or recipient level
to provide technical assistance to
recipients.
The narrative response must:
a. Describe the nature of financial and
technical assistance to be provided to
the recipients and the activities that will
be conducted to deliver the technical
assistance;
b. Explain how financial and
technical assistance will develop or
increase the recipient’s capacity.
Indicate whether a new function is
being developed or if existing functions
are being expanded or performed more
effectively;
c. Identify which RCDI purpose areas
will be addressed with this assistance:
Housing, community facilities, or
community and economic development.
d. Demonstrate that the applicant has
conducted programs of financial and
technical assistance and achieved
measurable results in the areas of
housing, community facilities, or
community and economic development
in rural areas. Provide the name, contact
information, and the type and amount of
the financial and technical assistance
the applicant organization has provided
to the following for the last 3 years:
Æ Nonprofit organizations in the rural
areas.
Æ Low-income communities in rural
areas (also include the type of entity,
e.g., city government, town council or
village board).
Æ Federally recognized tribes or any
other culturally diverse organizations.
4. Linking to Regional Clusters and
Opportunities (20 Points)
The applicant must demonstrate how
they will utilize EDA funds to link rural
communities to markets, networks,
industry clusters, and other regional
opportunities and assets to improve the
rural regions’ competitiveness,
repatriate U.S. jobs, foster job creation,
retain existing jobs, support innovation,
and promote private investment in the
regional economy.
The narrative response must:
a. Describe the proposed activity to be
implemented by the applicant and how
it will link rural regions to the identified
clusters and opportunities;
b. Explain how the proposed activity
will address an identified need or
opportunity to meet activity objectives,
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
including supporting innovation and job
growth;
c. Explain how the activity will
implement goals, objectives or actions
identified in a Comprehensive
Economic Development Strategy or
Regional Strategic Plan which addresses
priorities specified at a regional scale;
d. Note the entity or entities that will
oversee activity development and
implementation and demonstrate that
these entities have experience in the
proposed activities and achieved
measurable results in the areas of
regional development and cluster
development; and
e. Demonstrate financial resources to
ensure institutional capacity to support
the projects in the long-term, without
significant future Federal funding.
5. Project Impact and Measurable
Outcomes (20 Points)
Applications funded under this
competitive solicitation are expected to
identify clear goals and demonstrate
potential for substantial benefits. While
each funding source will identify
performance metrics that applicants
must track and report, applicants are
encouraged to identify additional
metrics that can be used to assess the
impact of requested funding. Applicants
must also describe mechanisms for
tracking and reporting on these
outcomes.
Applicants are required to submit an
Integrated Work Plan (IWP) as part of
their submission package. The IWP is
designed to document the key activities
that will be supported by Funding
Agency, the anticipated dates these
activities will be completed, and the
anticipated core impacts that each
activity is expected to yield in the shortterm (during the 3 year project period)
and the long-term (within three years
after project end date). The impacts set
forth in the IWP should be forecasts
based on each activity; grantees will be
required to report on progress towards
reaching these forecasts throughout the
life of the project.
Applicants should utilize the Excelbased IWP template available on the
Rural Jobs Accelerator Web site, https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/
RuralJobsAccelerator. Each measure
should be broken down by funding
source (i.e. EDA, USDA, ARC, and
DRA), clearly linking proposed funding
to specific outcomes. A copy of the IWP
template is included as Attachment A to
this FFO for reference (please note how
activities, expected deadlines, and
anticipated impacts are separately
reported for each funding agency).
All applicants are required to utilize
and include the following measures in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
their IWP to report on anticipated
project impacts:
• Jobs Created during the Project
Period—Applicants should include an
estimate of the number of jobs that will
be created during the three year project
period as a direct result of funding from
one of the Funding Partners.
Anticipated jobs created should be
reported as full time equivalent (FTE) or
equivalents which are annualized for
the entire project period.
• Jobs Retained during the Project
Period—Applicants should include an
estimate of the number of jobs expected
to be retained during the three year
project period as a direct result of
funding from each of the Funding
Partners. Anticipated jobs retained
should be reported as FTEs or
equivalents which are annualized for
the entire project period.
• Private Investment Leverage during
the Project Period—Applicants should
include an estimate of the amount of
private investment that will be
leveraged during the three year project
period as a direct result of funding from
one of the Funding Partners.
• Businesses Assisted during the
Project Period—Applicants should
include an estimate of the number of
businesses expected to be assisted
during the three year project period as
a direct result of funding from one of the
Funding Partners.
• Engagement and Collaboration of
Regional Organizations—Applicants
should include an estimate of the
number and types of organizations
within the region expected to be
engaged in the project during the three
year project period.
• Long-term Jobs Created—
Applicants should include an estimate
of the number of jobs expected to be
created within three years after project
is completed (within six years from
project inception) that result from
funding from one of the Funding
Partners. Anticipated long-term jobs
created should be reported as FTEs or
equivalents which are annualized for
the entire six year period since the
original grant award.
• Long-term Jobs Retained—
Applicants should include an estimate
of the number of jobs expected to be
retained within three years after project
is completed (within six years from
project inception) that result from
funding from one of the Funding
Partners. Anticipated long-term jobs
retained should be reported as FTEs or
equivalents which are annualized for
the entire six year period since the
original grant award.
• Long-term Private Investment
Leveraged—Applicants should include
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16529
an estimate of the amount of private
investment that will be leveraged within
three years after project is completed
(within six years from project inception)
that result from funding from one of the
Funding Partners. Funds reported
should reflect the cumulative amount of
private investment anticipated to be
leveraged for the entire six year period
since the original grant award.
• Long-term Businesses Assisted—
Applicants should include an estimate
of the number of businesses that will be
assisted three years after project is
completed (within six years from project
inception) that result from funding from
one of the Funding Partners.
Additionally, applicants are
encouraged to provide other selfidentified measures within the IWP
which are specific to their proposed
project activities. Such measures should
align with the objectives of the
individual project, as well as the overall
Rural Jobs Accelerator initiative. For
example, applicants may consider the
following types of measures:
• Cooperation:
Æ Number of organizations actively
engaged in the cluster (and new ones
added to the network)
Æ Number of symposia held by the
cluster
Æ Number of further cooperative
agreements as a result of the supported
activity
• Innovation:
Æ Number of new projects developed
Æ Number of education and training
activities related to innovation
Æ Number of workshops and seminars
related to innovation
• Workforce Skills:
Æ Percentage of employees for which
training was provided by this project
Æ Average number of qualified
applicants per job
Æ Number of recruitment events at
universities and community colleges
• Business Creation:
Æ Number of newly formed
businesses as a result of the supported
activity
Æ Number of jobs relocated from
outside the U.S. to the region
• Housing Support:
Æ Change in available housing units
in supported communities
• Access to Capital:
Æ Amount and number of new equity
investments in cluster firms
Æ Amount and number of new loans
to cluster firms
• Market Development:
Æ Dollar increase in exports resulting
from the project activities
Applicants should note that the
submitted IWP and associated
information will form the basis by
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
16530
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
which selected projects will be
monitored. Grantees will be required to
submit regular reports to the Funding
Partners which document project
progress against the scopes of work,
deadlines, and short-term measures
outlined in the original IWP. Reporting
requirements will be outlined in the
terms and conditions of the grant award.
Applicant teams requesting funding
from ARC or DRA should include
measures for those funding agencies in
the IWP.
Evaluation criterion for this section
will be based on the following:
a. Includes specific and quantifiable
measures of project impacts that benefit
the regional economy and will support
the cluster;
b. Presents measures that are relevant
to the proposed scopes of work and
objectives;
c. Presents measures that will help
monitor progress towards meeting the
objectivities of the Rural Jobs
Accelerator; and
d. Presents practical and clear
tracking and reporting mechanisms.
6. Soundness of Approach (15 Points)
The overall proposal will be
considered under this criterion.
Applicants must list the page numbers
in the application that address these
factors.
The narrative response must
demonstrate:
a. The ability to implement the
proposed scopes of work based on prior
accomplishments has been
demonstrated for both Building
Community and Regional Capacity and
Regional Linkages scopes of work.
b. The proposed technical assistance
program and regional linkages program
is clearly stated and the application has
defined how this proposal will be
implemented. The plan for
implementation is viable for both
Building Community and Regional
Capacity and Regional Linkages scopes
of work.
c. Cost effectiveness will be evaluated
based on the budget in the application
for both Building Community and
Regional Capacity and Regional
Linkages scopes of work. For the
Building Community and Regional
Capacity activity the proposed grant
amount and matching funds should be
utilized to maximize capacity building
at the recipient level.
d. The proposal fits the objectives for
which applications were invited.
Application and Eligibility Review
Each Funding Agency will conduct an
initial application and eligibility review
of applications submitted and received
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
by the deadline Each Funding Agency
will independently review applications
to ensure compliance with its agencyspecific requirements. This review will
determine if the application satisfies: (a)
All requirements for a complete
submission (including all required
forms, documentation of matching
funds, and addenda to the Project
Description); (b) agency-specific
eligibility criteria; and (c) agencyspecific requirements for permitted
activities. Applications found to be
responsive will be forwarded for merit
review.
Merit Review Panels
Upon completion of the application
and eligibility review, Merit Review
Panels comprised of Federal employees
from the Funding Agencies, who will
review and evaluate applications
deemed responsive. Merit Review
Panels may also include experts from
Support Agencies. The Merit Review
Panels will evaluate the applications
against the evaluation criteria
enumerated. The Merit review Panels
will award up to 100 points to each
application, rank the applications by
consensus, and forward the evaluation
findings and rankings to the Policy
Review and Recommendation
Committee.
Policy Review and Recommendation
Committee
Upon completion of the merit review,
the Policy Review and Recommendation
Committee composed of senior officials
from the Primary Funding Agencies will
review the top 30 ranked applications,
or approximately 5 per EDA Region.
This Committee will evaluate the
applications based on how well they
meet the purposes of the Rural Job
Accelerator initiative. They may
consider such factors as, geographic
balance in distribution of program
funds, balance of diverse project types
in the distribution of program funds,
balanced funding for a diverse group of
organizations including smaller and
rural organizations that may form part of
a broader consortium to serve diverse
populations, the availability of funds,
the applicant’s performance under
previous Federal financial assistance
awards, and the extent to which the
applicant integrates and leverages
multiple Federal resources to effectively
support rural region and cluster
development. For projects based within
regions serviced by the Delta Regional
Authority and the Appalachian Regional
Commission, the Policy Review and
Recommendation Committee will give
additional consideration to projects that
fully integrate and leverage the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
resources provided by these agencies.
Based on these combined factors, the
Policy Review and Recommendation
Committee will recommend
approximately twenty applications to
the agency principals and selecting
officials.
Agency Principals and Selecting
Officials
Agency principals and selecting
officials will work together to make the
final award determinations. The agency
principals for the Primary Funding
agencies include the Assistant Secretary
of Commerce for Economic
Development and the Undersecretary for
Rural Development of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
Selecting officials are authorized to
finalize funding decisions and make
awards. The USDA selecting official
will be the Tammye Trevino,
Administrator for Rural Housing
Service.
Selecting officials may follow the
recommendations of the Policy Review
and Recommendation Committee, or
may consider additional information in
making their selections. If a selecting
official makes a selection of an
application that is not included in the
set of applications recommended by the
Policy Review and Recommendation
Committee, the selecting official must
document the rationale for the decision
in writing.
Unsuccessful Competition
On occasion, competitive solicitations
or competitive panels produce less than
optimum results, such as a competition
resulting in the receipt of no
applications, a competition resulting in
the receipt of only unresponsive or
unqualified applications, or too few
highly rated applications. In the event
that these conditions arise, the Funding
Agencies shall take the most time- and
cost-effective approach available that is
in the best interest of the Federal
government. This includes (1) Recompetition, (2) re-paneling, or (3)
formal negotiation.
Transparency
The agencies and bureaus involved in
this initiative are committed to
conducting a transparent grant award
process and publicizing information
about investment decisions. Applicants
are advised that their respective
applications and information related to
its review and evaluation may be shared
publicly as permitted by law. In
addition, information about the grant
award progress and related results may
also be made publicly available. USDA
may release a list of Rural Jobs
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
Accelerator applicants including
organization, project name, city and
state.
Additional information regarding the
‘‘Rural Jobs and Innovation Accelerator
Challenge’’ can be found at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/
RuralJobsAccelerator.html.
Submission of Applications
An applicant may obtain the
appropriate application package
electronically at Grants.gov. All
components of the appropriate
application package may be accessed
and downloaded (in a screen-fillable
format) at www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp. The preferred
electronic file format for attachments is
PDF; however, electronic files in
Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or
Microsoft Excel will also be accepted.
The applicant must complete the
Grants.gov registration process to
submit applications through Grants.gov;
however, please note that registration is
not required for an applicant to access,
view, or download the application
packages. Alternatively, an applicant
may request a paper application package
by contacting the USDA Rural
Development State Office listed in this
Notice.
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Submission
The Primary Funding Agencies
encourage electronic submission of
applications through Grants.gov.
Applicants should not wait until the
application closing date to begin the
registration and submission process. In
order to submit an application through
Grants.gov, applicants first must register
for a Grants.gov user id and password.
Note that this registration process can
take between three to five business days
or as long as two weeks if all steps are
not completed in a timely manner (see
https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
get_registered.jsp). Applicants should
register as organizations, not as
individuals. Please note that
organizations already registered with
Grants.gov do not need to re-register;
however, all registered organizations
must keep their Central Contractor
Registration (CCR) database registration
up-to-date and must designate the
person submitting the application on
behalf of the organization as an
Authorized Organizational
Representative (AOR). See the following
discussion of AOR requirements in this
section.
An application that is not validated
and time-stamped by Grants.gov by the
applicable deadline will not be
processed.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Applicants need to be aware that once
an application is submitted, it
undergoes a validation process through
Grants.gov in which the application
may be accepted or rejected by the
system. The validation process may take
24 to 48 hours to complete.
Applications that contain errors will be
rejected by Grants.gov and will not be
forwarded to the Funding Agencies for
review. The applicant must correct the
error before Grants.gov will accept and
validate the application. The Funding
Agencies will not accept late
applications that were rejected by
Grants.gov due to errors. Accordingly,
the Funding Agencies strongly suggest
that applicants submit their applications
at least four to five days before the
application deadline to allow the
application to be accepted and validated
by Grants.gov and to allow time for
errors to be corrected. The Funding
Agencies will consider the time-stamp
on the validation from Grants.gov as the
official submission time.
AOR requirement. Applicants must
register as organizations, not as
individuals, and must register at least
one Authorized Organizational
Representative (AOR) for your
organization. AORs registered at
Grants.gov are the only officials with the
authority to submit applications via
Grants.gov. If the application is
submitted to Grants.gov by anyone other
than your organization’s AOR, it will be
rejected by Grants.gov and cannot be
considered. Please note: An Applicant
Team must submit its application
package using the registered AOR for
the organization applying for EDA
funds.
The Funding Agencies will not accept
late submissions caused by Grants.gov
registration issues, including CCR and
AOR issues.
The following instructions provide
step-by-step instructions for accessing,
completing, and submitting an
application via Grants.gov. Save the
application package at regular intervals
to avoid losing work.
a. Navigate to the URL
www.grants.gov.
b. Select ‘‘Apply for Grants’’ from the
left-hand menu at Grants.gov.
c. Ensure that you have installed a
Grants.gov compatible version of Adobe
Acrobat Reader on your computer.
Incompatible versions of Adobe Acrobat
Reader may cause errors. Please see
compatible versions of Adobe Reader at
https://grants.gov/help/
download_software.jsp#adobe811.
d. Select the link ‘‘Download a Grant
Application’’ package.
e. Enter [[‘‘Rural Jobs Accelerator
2012’’]] as the Funding Opportunity
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16531
Number and click on ‘‘Download
Package.’’
f. Click on the ‘‘Download’’ link.
g. Click on ‘‘Download Application
Package.’’
h. Save the application package to
your computer or network drive. Note
that the application package file can be
shared among multiple users; however,
each user must have a Grants.gov
compatible version of Adobe Acrobat
Reader installed in order to save
changes to the application package.
i. Click on each of the documents in
the ‘‘Mandatory Documents’’ box and,
after selecting each one, click on the
arrow to move these into the
‘‘Mandatory Documents for
Submission’’ box.
j. In the ‘‘Optional Documents’’ box,
click on Form SF–LLL if non-Federal
funds have been or are planned to be
used for lobbying in connection with a
covered federal transaction, including
this competitive solicitation and then
move this to the ‘‘Optional Documents
for Submission’’ box. If you will submit
your application via Grants.gov, also
click on ‘‘Attachments’’ and move this
to the ‘‘Optional Documents for
Submission’’ box. The Attachments
Form also allows applicants to attach
the Project Description documents,
forms, and other documents required as
addenda under this competition. Note
that if the applicant is not submitting
electronically, the Project Description
documents and other required forms
and addenda all must be printed and
submitted in hard copy via a CD or
paper.
k. The application package should
pre-populate with all selected forms
embedded. Complete all mandatory
fields (highlighted in yellow) on the
forms. Note that mandatory fields will
vary based on the type of applicant and
the type of assistance sought. On Form
CD–511, type ‘‘not awarded yet’’ in the
‘‘project number’’ field.
l. Attach the Project Description
documents and other required forms
and addenda. Note, the mandatory
USDA forms can be found on the ‘‘Full
Announcement’’ tab, and must be
included as attachments to the
application. The preferred electronic
file format for the required attachments
is PDF; however, the Funding Agencies
will accept electronic files in Microsoft
Word, WordPerfect, or Excel formats.
m. When all mandatory fields have
been completed, scroll to the top and
click on ‘‘Check Package for Errors.’’
n. Click ‘‘Save.’’
o. Click ‘‘Save and Submit.’’ At this
point, the registered AOR for the EDA
applicant must be connected to the
Internet and will be prompted to enter
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
16532
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
the appropriate Grants.gov user id and
password in order to electronically
submit the application.
Verify submission was successful.
Applicants should save and print
written proof of an electronic
submission made at Grants.gov.
Applicants can expect to receive
multiple emails regarding the status of
their submission. Since email
communication can be unreliable,
applicants must proactively check on
the status of their application if they do
not receive email notifications within a
day of submission. The first email
should confirm receipt of the
application, and the second should
indicate that the application has either
been successfully validated by the
system before transmission to the
Funding Agencies or has been rejected
due to errors. Please note: That it can
take up to two business days after
Grants.gov receives an application for
applicants to receive email notification
of an error. An applicant will receive a
third email once EDA has retrieved an
application from Grants.gov.
Applicants should refrain from
submitting multiple copies of the same
application package. Applicants should
save and print both the submitted
application confirmation screen
provided on Grants.gov, and the
confirmation email sent by Grants.gov
when the application has been
successfully received and validated in
the system. If an applicant receives an
email from Grants.gov indicating that
the application was received and
subsequently validated, but does not
receive an email from Grants.gov
indicating that EDA has retrieved the
application package within 72 hours of
that email, the applicant may contact
the appropriate person listed in
Appendix F. of this FFO to inquire if
EDA is in receipt of the submission.
It is the applicant’s responsibility to
verify that its submission was received
and validated successfully at
Grants.gov. To see the date and time
your application was received, log on to
Grants.gov and click on the ‘‘Track My
Application’’ link from the left-hand
menu. For a successful submission, the
application must be received and
validated by Grants.gov, and an agency
tracking number assigned. If your
application has a status of ‘‘Received’’ it
is awaiting validation by Grants.gov.
Once validation is complete, the status
will change to ‘‘Validated’’ or ‘‘Rejected
with Errors.’’ If the status is ‘‘Rejected
with Errors,’’ your application has not
been received successfully. Some of the
reasons Grants.gov may reject an
application can be found at https://
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
www.grants.gov/applicants/
submit_application_faqs.jsp.
Systems issues. If you experience a
Grants.gov ‘‘systems issue’’ (technical
problems or glitches with the Grants.gov
Web site) that you believe threatens
your ability to complete a submission,
please (a) print any error message
received and (b) call the Grants.gov
Contact Center at 1–800–518–4726 for
immediate assistance. Ensure that you
obtain a case number regarding your
communications with Grants.gov.
Please note: Problems with an applicant
organization’s computer system or
equipment are not considered ‘‘systems
issues.’’ Similarly, an applicant’s failure
to (a) complete the registration, (b)
ensure that a registered AOR with the
EDA applicant submits the application,
or (c) notice receipt of an email message
from Grants.gov, are not considered
systems issues. A Grants.gov ‘‘systems
issue’’ is an issue occurring in
connection with the operations of
Grants.gov itself, such as the temporary
loss of service by Grants.gov due to an
unexpected volume of traffic or failure
of information technology systems, both
of which are highly unlikely.
Applicants should access the
following link for assistance in
navigating Grants.gov and for a list of
useful resources: https://www.grants.gov/
help/help.jsp. Also, the following link
lists frequently asked questions (FAQs):
www.grants.gov/applicants/
submit_application_faqs.jsp. If you do
not find an answer to your question
under the ‘‘Applicant FAQs,’’ try
consulting the ‘‘Applicant User Guide’’
or contacting Grants.gov via email at
support@grants.gov or telephone at 1–
800–518–4726. The Grants.gov Contact
Center is open 24 hours a day, seven
days a week.
Entities wishing to apply for
assistance may download the
application documents and
requirements delineated in this Notice
from the RCDI Web site: https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rhs/rcdi.
Application information for electronic
submissions may be found at https://
www.grants.gov.
Applicants may also request paper
application packages from the Rural
Development office in their state.
Applicants have the option of
submitting their application on a CD or
a completed paper application.
Proposals submitted via CD or paper
must be received at or before 5 p.m.
Eastern time on May 9, 2012 at the
following address: Attn: Terry D’Addio,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 14th
and Independence Avenue SW., Room
6015–S, Washington, DC 20250.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Proposals shall be submitted in sealed
envelopes or packages with a cover page
labeled with ‘‘Fiscal Year (FY) 2012
Rural Jobs Accelerator,’’ the project
name; and the organizations included in
the application. One original and two
copies of the CD or paper submission
must be delivered via postal mail or
courier service with a postmark or
courier service’s time and date stamp on
or before the deadline. USDA mail
security measures may delay receipt of
United States Postal Service mail for up
to three weeks. Therefore, applicants
that submit via paper or CD are strongly
advised to use carriers with guaranteed
delivery services and that provide
confirmation that indicates the
application was delivered by the
deadline.
CDs must be labeled with the project
name and verified as virus free. The
Funding Agencies will not review any
proposals submitted on CDs on which
viruses are detected.
The CD or paper submission must
include all the required forms, Project
Description documents and addenda for
all applicants proposing scopes of work
for the joint project (see section V.C. of
this FFO for application content
requirements).
The applicant may download the
appropriate application package in a
screen-fillable format from https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/
apply_for_grants.jsp, save it
electronically, and upload it onto the
CD.
If your application is received after
the deadline, it will not be reviewed.
Selection of an organization under
this FFO does not constitute approval of
the proposed project as submitted.
Before any funds are awarded, the
Funding Agencies may enter into
negotiations about such items as
program components, staffing and
funding levels, and administrative
systems in place to support
implementation of the award. The
amount of available funding may
require the final award amount to be
less than that requested by the
applicant. If the negotiations do not
result in a mutually acceptable
submission, the Grants Officer for the
applicable Funding Agency reserves the
right to terminate the negotiations and
decline to fund the application. The
Funding Agencies reserve the right not
to fund any application received under
this competitive solicitation.
Unsuccessful Competition
On occasion, competitive solicitations
or competitive panels produce less than
optimum results, such as a competition
resulting in the receipt of no
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
applications, a competition resulting in
the receipt of only unresponsive or
unqualified applications, or too few
highly rated applications. In the event
that these conditions arise, the Funding
Agencies shall take the most time- and
cost-effective approach available that is
in the best interest of the Federal
government. This includes (1) Recompetition, (2) re-paneling, or (3)
formal negotiation.
Part VIII—Award Administration
Information
A. General Information
Within the limit of funds available for
such purpose, the awarding official of
the Agency shall make grants in ranked
order to eligible applicants under the
procedures set forth in this Notice.
B. Award Notice
Applicants will be notified of
selection by letter. Unsuccessful
applicants will receive notification
including appeal rights by mail. In
addition, selected applicants will be
requested to verify that components of
the application have not changed at the
time of selection and on the award
obligation date, if requested by the
Agency. The award is not approved
until all information has been verified,
and the awarding official of the Agency
has signed Form RD 1940–1, ‘‘Request
for Obligation of Funds.’’
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Grantees will be required to do the
following:
1. Execute a Rural Community
Development Initiative Grant
Agreement.
2. Execute Form RD 1940–1.
3. Use Form SF 270, ‘‘Request for
Advance or Reimbursement,’’ to request
reimbursements. Provide receipts for
expenditures, timesheets and any other
documentation to support the request
for reimbursement.
4. Provide financial status and project
performance reports on a quarterly basis
starting with the first full quarter after
the grant award.
5. Maintain a financial management
system that is acceptable to the Agency.
6. Ensure that records are maintained
to document all activities and
expenditures utilizing RCDI grant funds
and matching funds. Receipts for
expenditures will be included in this
documentation.
7. Provide annual audits or
management reports on Form RD 442–
2, ‘‘Statement of Budget, Income and
Equity,’’ and Form RD 442–3, ‘‘Balance
Sheet,’’ depending on the amount of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Federal funds expended and the
outstanding balance.
8. Collect and maintain data provided
by recipients on race, sex, and national
origin and ensure recipients collect and
maintain the same data on beneficiaries.
Race and ethnicity data will be collected
in accordance with OMB Federal
Register notice, ‘‘Revisions to the
Standards for the Classification of
Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity,’’
(62 FR 58782), October 30, 1997. Sex
data will be collected in accordance
with Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972. These items
should not be submitted with the
application but should be available
upon request by the Agency.
9. Provide a final project performance
report.
10. Identify and report any association
or relationship with Rural Development
employees.
11. The intermediary and recipient
must comply with Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1968, Title IX of the
Education Amendments of 1972,
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, the Age Discrimination Act of
1975, Executive Order 12898, Executive
Order 12250 and RD Instruction 7 CFR
part 1901–E.
12. The grantee must comply with
policies, guidance, and requirements as
described in the following applicable
OMB Circulars and Code of Federal
Regulations:
a. OMB Circular A–87 (Cost
Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Government);
b. OMB Circular A–122 (Cost
Principles for Non-profit Organizations);
c. OMB Circular A–133 (Audits of
States, Local Governments, and NonProfit Organizations);
d. 7 CFR part 3015 (Uniform Federal
Assistance Regulations);
e. 7 CFR part 3016 (Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State
and Local Governments);
f. 2 CFR parts 417 and 180
(Government-wide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement);
g. 7 CFR part 3019 (Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other
Non-profit Organizations); and
h. 7 CFR part 3052 (Audits of States,
Local Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations).
Additional Requirements
No Obligation for Future Funding
If an applicant is awarded funding
under this Notice, USDA is not under
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16533
any obligation to provide any additional
future funding in connection with that
award or to make future award(s).
Amendment or renewal of an award to
increase funding or to extend the period
of performance is at the discretion of
USDA.
Freedom of Information Act Disclosure
The Freedom of Information Act (5
U.S.C. 552) (FOIA) and the USDA’s
implementing regulations at 7 CFR part
1, subpart A set forth the rules and
procedures to make requested material,
information and records publicly
available. Unless prohibited by law and
to the extent permitted under FOIA,
contents of applications submitted by
applicants may be released in response
to FOIA requests.
Past Performance and Non-Compliance
With Award Provisions
Unsatisfactory performance under
prior Federal awards may result in an
application not being considered for
funding. Failure to comply with any or
all of the provisions of an award may
have a negative impact on future
funding by the USDA and may be
considered grounds for any or all of the
following actions: (1) Establishing an
account receivable; (2) withholding
payments to the recipient under any
USDA award(s); (3) changing the
method of payment from advance to
reimbursement only; (4) imposing other
special award conditions; (5)
suspending any active USDA award(s);
and (6) terminating any active USDA
award(s).
Part IX—Agency Contact
Contact the Rural Development office
in the state where the applicant’s
headquarters is located. A list of Rural
Development State Offices is included
in this Notice.
Part X—Nondiscrimination Statement
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) prohibits discrimination in all
its programs and activities on the basis
of race, color, national origin, age,
disability, and where applicable, sex,
marital status, familial status, parental
status, religion, sexual orientation,
genetic information, political beliefs,
reprisal, or because all or part of an
individual’s income is derived from any
public assistance program. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of
program information (Braille, large
print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–
2600 (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
16534
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
USDA, Director, Office of Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call
(800) 795–3272 (voice) or (202) 720–
6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal
opportunity provider, employer, and
lender.
Part XI—Appeal Process
All adverse determinations regarding
applicant eligibility and the awarding of
points as part of the selection process
are appealable pursuant to 7 CFR part
11. Instructions on the appeal process
will be provided at the time an
applicant is notified of the adverse
decision.
Grant Amount Determination
In the event the applicant is awarded
a grant that is less than the amount
requested, the applicant will be required
to modify its application to conform to
the reduced amount before execution of
the grant agreement. The Agency
reserves the right to reduce or withdraw
the award if acceptable modifications
are not submitted by the awardee within
15 working days from the date the
request for modification is made. Any
modifications must be within the scope
of the original application.
Rural Development State Office
Contacts
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Note: Telephone numbers listed are not
toll-free.
Alabama State Office
Suite 601, Sterling Centre, 4121
Carmichael Road, Montgomery, AL
36106–3683, (334) 279–3400, TDD (334)
279–3495, Allen Bowen.
Alaska State Office
800 West Evergreen, Suite 201, Palmer, AK
99645, (907) 761–7778, TDD (907) 761–
8905, Merlaine Kruse.
Arizona State Office
230 North 1st Avenue, Suite 206, Phoenix,
AZ 85003, (602) 280–8747, TDD (602)
280–8705, Leonard Gradillas.
Arkansas State Office
700 W. Capitol Ave., Rm. 3416, Little Rock,
AR 72201–3225, (501) 301–3265, TDD
(501) 301–3200, Stephen Lagasse.
California State Office
430 G Street, Agency 4169, Davis, CA
95616–4169, (530) 792–5810, TDD (530)
792–5848, Janice Waddell.
Colorado State Office
Denver Federal Center, Building 56, Room
2300, P.O. Box 25426*, Denver, CO
80225–0426, (720) 544–2927, TDD (720)
544–2976, Jerry Tamlin.
Connecticut
Served by Massachusetts State Office.
Delaware and Maryland State Office
1221 College Park Dr., Suite 200, Dover, DE
19904–8713, (302) 857–3627, TDD (302)
857–3585, Denise MacLeish.
Florida & Virgin Islands State Office
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
4440 NW. 25th Place, P.O. Box 147010,
Gainesville, FL 32614–7010, (352) 338–
3485, TDD (352) 338–3499, Michael
Langston.
Georgia State Office
Stephens Federal Building, 355 E. Hancock
Avenue, Athens, GA 30601–2768, (706)
546–2171, TDD (706) 546–2034, Jerry M.
Thomas.
Guam
Served by Hawaii State Office.
Hawaii, Guam, & Western Pacific Territories
State Office
Room 311, Federal Building, 154
Waianuenue Avenue, Hilo, HI 96720,
(808) 933–8317, TDD (808) 933–8321,
Alton Kimura.
Idaho State Office
9173 West Barnes Dr., Suite A1, Boise, ID
83709, (208) 378–5617, TDD (208) 378–
5600, David A. Flesher.
Illinois State Office
2118 West Park Court, Suite A, Champaign,
IL 61821, (217) 403–6209, TDD (217)
403–6240, Michael Wallace.
Indiana State Office
5975 Lakeside Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN
46278–1996, (317) 290–3100 (ext. 407),
TDD (317) 290–3343, Rochelle Owen.
Iowa State Office
873 Federal Building, 210 Walnut Street,
Des Moines, IA 50309, (515) 284–4459,
TDD (515) 284–4858, Karla Peiffer.
Kansas State Office
1303 SW. First American Place, Suite 100,
Topeka, KS 66604–4040, (785) 271–2728,
TDD (785) 271–2767, Kent Evans.
Kentucky State Office
771 Corporate Drive, Suite 200, Lexington,
KY 40503, (859) 224–7415, TDD (859)
224–7300, Vernon Brown.
Louisiana State Office
3727 Government Street, Alexandria, LA
71302, (318) 473–7965, TDD (318) 473–
7920, Richard Hoffpauir.
Maine State Office
967 Illinois Ave., Suite 4, P.O. Box 405,
Bangor, ME 04402–0405, (207) 990–
9124, TDD (207) 942–7331, Ron Lambert.
Maryland
Served by Delaware State Office.
Massachusetts, Connecticut, & Rhode Island
State Office
451 West Street, Suite 2, Amherst, MA
01002–2999, (413) 253–4300, TDD (413)
253–7068, Daniel R. Beaudette.
Michigan State Office
3001 Coolidge Road, Suite 200, East
Lansing, MI 48823, (517) 324–5208, TDD
(517) 337–6795, Christine M. Maxwell.
Minnesota State Office
410 Farm Credit Service Building, 375
Jackson Street, St. Paul, MN 55101–1853,
(651) 602–7800, TDD (651) 602–3799,
Terry Louwagie.
Mississippi State Office
Federal Building, Suite 831, 100 W. Capitol
Street, Jackson, MS 39269, (601) 965–
4326, TDD (601) 965–5850, Darnella
Smith-Murray.
Missouri State Office
601 Business Loop 70 West, Parkade
Center, Suite 235, Columbia, MO 65203,
(573) 876–0976, TDD (573) 876–9480,
Clark Thomas.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Montana State Office
2229 Boot Hill Court, Bozeman, MT 59715,
(406) 585–2520, TDD (406) 585–2545,
Steve Troendle.
Nebraska State Office
Federal Building, Room 152, 100
Centennial Mall N., Lincoln, NE 68508,
(402) 437–5559, TDD (402) 437–5551,
Denise Brosius-Meeks.
Nevada State Office
1390 South Curry Street, Carson City, NV
89703–9910, (775) 887–1222 (ext. 113),
TDD 7–1–1, Cheryl Couch.
New Hampshire
Served by Vermont State Office.
New Jersey State Office
8000 Midlantic Drive, 5th Floor North,
Suite 500, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054, (856)
787–7753, Kenneth Drewes.
New Mexico State Office
6200 Jefferson St. NE., Room 255,
Albuquerque, NM 87109, (505) 761–
4954, TDD (505) 761–4938, Martha
Torrez.
New York State Office
The Galleries of Syracuse, 441 S. Salina
Street, Suite 357, Syracuse, NY 13202–
2541, (315) 477–6400, TDD (315) 477–
6447, Gail Giannotta.
North Carolina State Office
4405 Bland Road, Suite 260, Raleigh, NC
27609, (919) 873–2063, TDD (919) 873–
2003, William A. Hobbs.
North Dakota State Office
Federal Building, Room 208, 220 East
Rosser Ave., P.O. Box 1737, Bismarck,
ND 58502–1737, (701) 530–2029, TDD
(701) 530–2113, Mark Wax.
Ohio State Office
Federal Building, Room 507, 200 North
High Street, Columbus, OH 43215–2418,
(614) 255–2391, TDD (614) 255–2554,
David M. Douglas.
Oklahoma State Office
100 USDA, Suite 108, Stillwater, OK
74074–2654, (405) 742–1061, TDD (405)
742–1007, Jerry Efurd.
Oregon State Office
1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 801, Portland,
OR 97232, (503) 414–3362, TDD (503)
414–3387, Sam Goldstein.
Pennsylvania State Office
One Credit Union Place, Suite 330,
Harrisburg, PA 17110–2996, (717) 237–
2281, TDD (717) 237–2281, Susanne
Gantz.
Puerto Rico State Office
˜
654 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 601, San
Juan, PR 00918–6106, (787) 766–5095,
TDD (787) 766–5332, Nereida Rodriguez.
Rhode Island
Served by Massachusetts State Office.
South Carolina State Office
Strom Thurmond Federal Building, 1835
Assembly Street, Room 1007, Columbia,
SC 29201, (803) 253–3425, TDD (803)
765–5697, Jesse T. Risher.
South Dakota State Office
Federal Building, Room 210, 200 Fourth
Street SW., Huron, SD 57350, (605) 352–
1145, TDD (605) 352–1147, Doug Roehl.
Tennessee State Office
Suite 300, 3322 West End Avenue,
Nashville, TN 37203–1071, (615) 783–
1345, TDD (615) 783–1397, Keith Head.
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 21, 2012 / Notices
Texas State Office
Federal Building, Suite 102, 101 South
Main, Temple, TX 76501, (254) 742–
9787, TDD (254) 742–9749, Michael B.
Canales.
Utah State Office
Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building, 125
South State Street, Room 4311, P.O. Box
11350, Salt Lake City, UT 84138, (801)
524–4326, TDD (801) 524–3309, Debra
Meyer.
Vermont State Office
City Center, 3rd Floor, 89 Main Street,
Montpelier, VT 05602, (802) 828–6033,
TDD (802) 223–6365, Rhonda Shippee.
Virgin Islands
Served by Florida State Office.
Virginia State Office
Culpeper Building, Suite 238, 1606 Santa
Rosa Road, Richmond, VA 23229, (804)
287–1577, TDD (804) 287–1753, Kent
Ware.
Washington State Office
1835 Black Lake Boulevard, SW., Suite B,
Olympia, WA 98512–5715, (360) 704–
7737, Peter McMillin.
Western Pacific Territories
Served by Hawaii State Office.
West Virginia State Office
1550 Earl Core Road, Suite 101,
Morgantown, WV 26505, (304) 284–
4886, TDD (304) 284–4836, Janna
Lowery.
Wisconsin State Office
4949 Kirschling Court, Stevens Point, WI
54481, (715) 345–7615, TDD (715) 345–
7610, Brian Deaner.
Wyoming State Office
Federal Building, Room 1005, 100 East B
Street, P.O. Box 11005, Casper, WY
82602–5006, (307) 233–6700, TDD (307)
233–6719, Alana Cannon.
Washington, DC
Stop 0787, Room 0175, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–
0787, (202) 205–9685, Shirley J.
Stevenson.
Dated: March 14, 2012.
Cristina Chiappe,
Acting Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
Hampshire. The purpose of the planning
meeting is to consider next steps after
their January briefing.
Members of the public are entitled to
submit written comments. The
comments must be received in the
regional office by Friday, May 4, 2012.
Comments may be mailed to the Eastern
Regional Office, U.S. Commission on
Civil Rights, 624 9th Street NW., Suite
740, Washington, DC 20425, faxed to
(202) 376–7548, or emailed to
ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire
additional information may contact the
Eastern Regional Office at 202–376–
7533.
Persons needing accessibility services
should contact the Eastern Regional
Office at least ten (10) working days
before the scheduled date of the
meeting.
Records generated from this meeting
may be inspected and reproduced at the
Eastern Regional Office, as they become
available, both before and after the
meeting. Persons interested in the work
of this advisory committee are advised
to go to the Commission’s Web site,
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern
Regional Office at the above phone
number, email or street address.
The meetings will be conducted
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the Commission and
FACA.
Dated in Washington, DC, March 16, 2012.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs
Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2012–6774 Filed 3–20–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of the Census
[FR Doc. 2012–6611 Filed 3–20–12; 8:45 am]
Request for Nominations of Members
To Serve on the Census Bureau
National Advisory Committee on
Racial, Ethnic, and Other Populations
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting
of the New Hampshire Advisory
Committee
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the rules and
regulations of the U.S. Commission on
Civil Rights (Commission), and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), that a planning meeting of the
New Hampshire Advisory Committee to
the Commission will convene at 12:30
p.m. (EDT) on Wednesday, April 4,
2012, at the University of New
Hampshire, 400 Commercial Street,
Room 255, Manchester, New
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:15 Mar 20, 2012
Jkt 226001
Bureau of the Census,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of request for
nominations.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of the Census
(Census Bureau) is requesting
nominations of individuals and
organizations to serve on the Census
Bureau National Advisory Committee
on Racial, Ethnic, and Other
Populations. The Census Bureau will
consider nominations received in
response to this notice, as well as from
other sources. The SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16535
provides committee and membership
criteria.
Please submit nominations by
April 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Please submit nominations
to Jeri Green, Chief, Office of External
Engagement, U.S. Census Bureau, Room
8H182, 4600 Silver Hill Road,
Washington, DC 20233. Nominations
also may be submitted via fax at 301–
763–8609, or by email to
jeri.green@census.gov.
DATES:
Jeri
Green, Chief, Office of External
Engagement, U.S. Census Bureau, Room
8H182, 4600 Silver Hill Road,
Washington, DC 20233, telephone
(301) 763–2070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Census Bureau National Advisory
Committee on Racial, Ethnic, and Other
Populations (‘‘Advisory Committee’’)
was established in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Title
5, United States Code (U.S.C.),
Appendix 2). The following provides
information about the committee,
membership, and the nomination
process.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Objectives and Duties
1. The Advisory Committee advises
the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau
on the full range of economic, housing,
demographic, socioeconomic, linguistic,
technological, methodological,
geographic, behavioral, and operational
variables affecting the cost, accuracy,
and implementation of Census Bureau
programs and surveys, including the
decennial census.
2. The Advisory Committee advises
the Census Bureau on the identification
of new strategies for improved census
operations, survey and data collection
methods, including identifying cost
efficient ways to increase census
participation.
3. The Advisory Committee addresses
census policies, research and
methodology, tests, operations,
communications/messaging, and other
activities to ascertain needs and best
practices to improve censuses, surveys,
operations, and programs. This
expertise is necessary to ensure that the
Census Bureau continues to provide
relevant and timely statistics used by
federal, state, and local governments as
well as business and industry in an
increasingly technologically-oriented
society.
4. The Advisory Committee functions
solely as an advisory body under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act.
5. The Advisory Committee reports to
the Director.
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16519-16535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6611]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) Inviting Applications for the
Rural Community Development Initiative (RCDI) for Fiscal Year 2011 and
Fiscal Year 2012
AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Notice announces the availability of $8,611,000 of FYs
2011 and 2012 funding of competitive grant funds for the RCDI program
through the Rural Housing Service (RHS), an agency within the USDA
Rural Development mission area (Agency). Appropriation Acts made
available $4,990,000 in FY 2011 and $3,621,000 in FY 2012 for the RCDI
program for a total of $8,611,000 for the two fiscal years.
The RCDI grant program includes an initiative called the Rural Jobs
and Innovation Accelerator Challenge. For FY 2011 and the FY 2012 RCDI
funds will be divided between the traditional RCDI Program and the
Rural Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge as follows: $2,500,000
of the FY 2011 funds and $1,811,000 of the FY 2012 funds will be
available for the traditional RCDI program and $2,490,000 of the FY
2011 funds and $1,810,000 of the FY 2012 will be reserved for awards
through a Federal Funding Opportunity Announcement in partnership with
the Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration (EDA)
for the Rural Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge. An application
for ``Rural Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge'' funds must be
submitted to both USDA and EDA by an organization or a team of
organizations that is individually or collectively eligible to receive
funding from USDA and EDA. Additional information regarding the Rural
Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge can be found in Part VI and
Part VII of this NOFA. Requirements outlined in Parts II, III, VIII,
IX, X, and XI of this NOFA apply to both the Traditional RCDI Program
and the Rural Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge.
All applicants must provide matching funds in an amount at least
equal to the Federal grant. These grants will be made to qualified
intermediary organizations that will provide financial and technical
assistance to recipients to develop their capacity and ability to
undertake projects related to housing, community facilities, or
community and economic development. This Notice lists the information
needed to submit an application for these funds.
DATES: The deadline for receipt of an application--May 9, 2012. The
application date is firm. The Agency will not consider any application
received after the deadline. Applicants intending to mail applications
must provide sufficient time to permit delivery on or before the
closing deadline date and time. Acceptance by the United States Postal
Service or private mailer does not constitute delivery. Facsimile (FAX)
and postage due applications will not be accepted.
ADDRESSES: Entities wishing to apply for assistance may download the
application documents and requirements delineated in this Notice from
the RCDI Web site: https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rhs/rcdi/index.htm.
Application information for electronic submissions may be found at
https://www.grants.gov. Applicants may also request paper application
packages from the Rural Development office in their state. A list of
Rural Development offices is included in this Notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Rural Development office for the
state the applicant is located in. A list of Rural Development State
Office contacts is included in this Notice.
Programs Affected
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under Number 10.446. This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental
consultation with State and local officials because it is not listed by
the Secretary of Agriculture, pursuant to 7 CFR 3015.302, as a covered
program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The paperwork burden has been cleared by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control Number 0575-0180.
National Environmental Policy Act
This Notice has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ``Environmental Program.'' Rural Development has determined
that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required because the
issuance of regulations and instructions, as well as amendments to
them, describing administrative and financial procedures for
processing, approving and implementing the Agency's financial programs
is categorically excluded in the Agency's NEPA regulation found at 7
CFR 1940.310(e)(3) of Subpart G, Environmental Program. Thus, in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4347), Rural Development has determined that this NOFA
does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. Furthermore, individual awards under
this NOFA are hereby classified as Categorical Exclusions according to
1940.310(e), the award of financial assistance for planning purposes,
management and feasibility studies, or environmental impact analysis,
which do not require any additional documentation.
[[Page 16520]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview
Federal Agency: Rural Housing Service.
Funding Opportunity Title: Rural Community Development Initiative.
Announcement Type: Initial Announcement.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 10.446.
Part I--Funding Opportunity Description
Congress initially created the RCDI in Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 to
develop the capacity and ability of nonprofit organizations, low-income
rural communities, or federally recognized tribes to undertake projects
related to housing, community facilities, or community and economic
development in rural areas.
Part II--Award Information
Appropriation Acts have made available a total of $8,611,000 for
RCDI for FYs 2011 and 2012. The FY 2011 and the FY 2012 appropriated
RCDI funds will be divided between the traditional RCDI Program and the
Rural Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge as follows: $2,500,000
of the FY 2011 funds and $1,811,000 of the FY 2012 funds will be
available for the traditional RCDI program and $2,490,000 of the FY
2011 funds and $1,810,000 of the FY 2012 will be reserved for awards
through a Federal Funding Opportunity Announcement in partnership with
the Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration for the
Rural Jobs and Innovation Accelerator Challenge. The Rural Jobs
Accelerator provides resources to support the development of clusters
in approximately 20 regions, selected through a competitive inter-
agency grant process, and assist rural distressed communities
accelerate job creation by: leveraging local assets, building stronger
communities, and creating regional linkages. Opportunities for
accelerated job creation in rural regions can be found in numerous
high-potential industry clusters, including renewable energy, food
production, rural tourism, natural resources, and advanced
manufacturing.
Qualified private, nonprofit and public (including tribal)
intermediary organizations proposing to carry out financial and
technical assistance programs will be eligible to receive the funding.
The intermediary will be required to provide matching funds in an
amount at least equal to the RCDI grant. The respective minimum and
maximum grant amount per intermediary is $50,000 and $300,000. The
intermediary must provide a program of financial and technical
assistance to a private nonprofit, community-based housing and
development organization, a low-income rural community or a federally
recognized tribe.
Part III--Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
1. Qualified private, nonprofit, including faith-based and
community organizations, in accordance with 7 CFR part 16, and public
(including tribal) intermediary organizations. Definitions that
describe eligible organizations and other key terms are listed below.
2. RCDI grantees that have an outstanding grant over 3 years old,
as of the application due date in this Notice, will not be eligible to
apply for this round of funding. Grant and matching funds must be
utilized in a timely manner to ensure that the goals and objectives of
the program are met.
B. Program Definitions
Agency--The Rural Housing Service (RHS) or its successor.
Beneficiary--Entities or individuals that receive benefits from
assistance provided by the recipient.
Capacity--The ability of a recipient to implement housing,
community facilities, or community and economic development projects.
Federally recognized tribes--Tribal entities recognized and
eligible for funding and services from the Bureau of Indian Affairs,
based on the current notice in the Federal Register published by the
Bureau of Indian Affairs. Tribally Designated Housing Entities are
eligible RCDI recipients.
Financial assistance--Funds, not to exceed $10,000 per award, used
by the intermediary to purchase supplies and equipment to build the
recipient's capacity.
Funds--The RCDI grant and matching money.
Intermediary--A qualified private, nonprofit (including faith-based
and community organizations), or public (including tribal) organization
that provides financial and technical assistance to multiple
recipients.
Low-income rural community--An authority, district, economic
development authority, regional council, or unit of government
representing an incorporated city, town, village, county, township,
parish, or borough whose median household income is at or below 80% of
either the state or national Median Household Income as measured by the
2000 Census.
Recipient--The entity that receives the financial and technical
assistance from the Intermediary. The recipient must be a private, non-
profit community-based housing and development organization, a low-
income rural community or a federally recognized Tribe.
Regional collaboration--Multi-jurisdictional areas typically within
a State, territory, or Federally designated Tribal land but which can
cross State, territory, or Tribal boundaries. The Regional
Collaboration approach is intended to combine the resources of the
Agency with those of State and local governments, educational
institutions, and the private and nonprofit sectors to implement
regional economic and community development strategies.
Rural and rural area--Any area other than (i) a city or town that
has a population of greater than 50,000 inhabitants; and (ii) the
urbanized area contiguous and adjacent to such city or town.
Technical assistance--Skilled help in improving the recipient's
abilities in the areas of housing, community facilities, or community
and economic development.
C. Cost Sharing or Matching
Matching funds--Cash or confirmed funding commitments. Matching
funds must be at least equal to the grant amount and committed for a
period of not less than the grant performance period. These funds can
only be used for eligible RCDI activities. In-kind contributions such
as salaries, donated time and effort, real and nonexpendable personal
property and goods and services cannot be used as matching funds. Grant
funds and matching funds must be used in equal proportions. This does
not mean funds have to be used equally by line item. The request for
advance or reimbursement and supporting documentation must show that
RCDI fund usage does not exceed the cumulative amount of matching funds
used. Grant funds will be disbursed pursuant to relevant provisions of
7 CFR parts 3015, 3016, and 3019, as applicable. Verification of
matching funds must be submitted with the application.
The intermediary is responsible for demonstrating that matching
funds are available, and committed for a period of not less than the
grant performance period to the RCDI proposal. Matching funds may be
provided by the intermediary or a third party. Other Federal funds may
be used as matching funds if authorized by statute and the purpose of
the funds is an eligible RCDI purpose. Matching funds must be used
[[Page 16521]]
to support the overall purpose of the RCDI program. RCDI funds will be
disbursed on an advance or reimbursement basis. Matching funds cannot
be expended prior to execution of the RCDI Grant Agreement. No
reimbursement will be made for any funds expended prior to execution of
the RCDI Grant Agreement unless the intermediary is a non-profit or
educational entity and has requested and received written Agency
approval of the costs prior to the actual expenditure. This exception
is applicable for up to 90 days prior to grant closing and only applies
to grantees that have received written approval but have not executed
the RCDI Grant Agreement. The Agency cannot retroactively approve
reimbursement for expenditures prior to execution of the RCDI Grant
Agreement.
D. Other Program Requirements
1. The recipient and beneficiary, but not the intermediary, must be
located in an eligible rural area. The physical location of the
recipient's office that will be receiving the financial and technical
assistance must be in an eligible rural area. If the recipient is a
low-income community, the median household income of the area where the
office is located must be at or below 80 percent of the State or
national median household income, whichever is higher. The applicable
Rural Development State Office can assist in determining the
eligibility of an area. A listing of Rural Development State Offices is
included in this Notice. A map showing eligible rural areas can be
found at the following link: https://eligibility.sc.egov.usda.gov/eligibility/welcomeAction.do?pageAction=RBSmenu&NavKey=property@13.
2. The recipients must be private nonprofit, including faith-based
organizations, community-based housing and development organizations,
low-income rural communities, or federally recognized tribes based on
the RCDI definitions of these groups.
3. Documentation must be submitted to verify recipient eligibility.
Acceptable documentation varies depending on the type of recipient.
Private nonprofit, faith or community-based organizations must provide
a certificate of incorporation and good standing from the Secretary of
the State of incorporation, or other similar and valid documentation of
nonprofit status. For low-income rural community recipients, the Agency
requires evidence that the entity is a public body and census data
verifying that the median household income of the community where the
office receiving the financial and technical assistance is located is
at, or below, 80 percent of the State or national median household
income, whichever is higher. For Federally recognized tribes, the
Agency needs the page listing their name from the current Federal
Register list of tribal entities recognized and eligible for funding
services (see the definition of federally recognized tribes in this
Notice for details on this list). If a tribe has been federally
recognized since the last list of federally recognized tribes was
published in the Federal Register, appropriate documentation from the
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs must be submitted
that legally verifies that recognition.
4. Individuals cannot be recipients.
5. The intermediary must provide matching funds at least equal to
the amount of the grant. Verification of matching funds must be
submitted with the application. Matching funds must be committed for a
period equal to the grant performance period.
6. The intermediary must provide a program of financial and
technical assistance to the recipient.
7. The intermediary organization must have been legally organized
for a minimum of 3 years and have at least 3 years prior experience
working with private nonprofit community-based housing and development
organizations, low-income rural communities, or tribal organizations in
the areas of housing, community facilities, or community and economic
development.
8. Proposals must be structured to utilize the grant funds within 3
years from the date of the award.
9. Each applicant, whether singularly or jointly, may submit one
application for the traditional RCDI funds and one application for the
Jobs Accelerator funds under this NOFA. This restriction does not
preclude the applicant from providing matching funds for other
applications.
10. Recipients can benefit from more than one RCDI application;
however, after grant selections are made, the recipient can only
benefit from multiple RCDI grants if the type of financial and
technical assistance the recipient will receive is not duplicative.
Funding for services to the same recipients must have separate and
identifiable accounts for compliance purposes.
11. The intermediary and the recipient cannot be the same entity.
The recipient can be a related entity to the intermediary, if it meets
the definition of a recipient, provided the relationship does not
create a conflict of interest that cannot be resolved to Rural
Development's satisfaction.
12. A nonprofit recipient must provide evidence that it is a valid
nonprofit when the intermediary applies for the RCDI grant.
Organizations with pending requests for nonprofit designations are not
eligible.
13. If the recipient is a low-income rural community, identify the
unit of government to which the financial and technical assistance will
be provided, e.g., town council or village board. The financial and
technical assistance must be provided to the organized unit of
government representing that community, not the community at large.
14. If a grantee has an outstanding RCDI grant over 3 years old, as
of the application due date in this Notice, it is not eligible to apply
for this round of funding.
15. The indirect cost category in the project budget should be used
only when a grant applicant has a federally negotiated indirect cost
rate. A copy of the current rate agreement must be provided with the
application.
16. Grant applicants must obtain a Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and register in the Central
Contractor Registration (CCR) prior to submitting a pre-application
pursuant to 2 CFR 25.200(b). In addition, an entity applicant must
maintain registration in the CCR database at all times during which it
has an active Federal award or an application or plan under
construction by the Agency. Similarly, all recipients of Federal
financial assistance are required to report information about first-
tier sub-awards and executive compensation in accordance to 2 CFR part
170. So long as an entity applicant does not have an exception under 2
CFR 170.110(b), the applicant must have the necessary processes and
systems in place to comply with the reporting requirements should the
applicant receive funding. See 2 CFR 170.200(b).
Eligible Fund Uses
Fund uses must be consistent with the RCDI purpose. A nonexclusive
list of eligible grant uses includes the following:
1. Provide technical assistance to develop recipients' capacity and
ability to undertake projects related to housing, community facilities,
or community and economic development, i.e., the intermediary hires a
staff person to provide technical assistance to the recipient or the
recipient hires a staff person, under the supervision of the
intermediary, to carry out the technical assistance provided by the
intermediary.
2. Develop the capacity of recipients to conduct community
development
[[Page 16522]]
programs, e.g., homeownership education or training for business
entrepreneurs.
3. Develop the capacity of recipients to conduct development
initiatives, e.g., programs that support micro-enterprise and
sustainable development.
4. Develop the capacity of recipients to increase their leveraging
ability and access to alternative funding sources by providing training
and staffing.
5. Develop the capacity of recipients to provide the technical
assistance component for essential community facilities projects.
6. Assist recipients in completing pre-development requirements for
housing, community facilities, or community and economic development
projects by providing resources for professional services, e.g.,
architectural, engineering, or legal.
7. Improve recipient's organizational capacity by providing
training and resource material on developing strategic plans, board
operations, management, financial systems, and information technology.
8. Purchase of computers, software, and printers, limited to
$10,000 per award, at the recipient level when directly related to the
technical assistance program being undertaken by the intermediary.
9. Provide funds to recipients for training-related travel costs
and training expenses related to RCDI.
Ineligible Fund Uses
1. Pass-through grants, capacity grants, and any funds provided to
the recipient in a lump sum that are not reimbursements.
2. Funding a revolving loan fund (RLF).
3. Construction (in any form).
4. Salaries for positions involved in construction, renovations,
rehabilitation, and any oversight of these types of activities.
5. Intermediary preparation of strategic plans for recipients.
6. Funding prostitution, gambling, or any illegal activities.
7. Grants to individuals.
8. Funding a grant where there may be a conflict of interest, or an
appearance of a conflict of interest, involving any action by the
Agency.
9. Paying obligations incurred before the beginning date without
prior Agency approval or after the ending date of the grant agreement.
10. Purchasing real estate.
11. Improvement or renovation of the grantee's, or recipient's
office space or for the repair or maintenance of privately owned
vehicles.
12. Any other purpose prohibited in 7 CFR parts 3015, 3016, and
3019, as applicable.
13. Using funds for recipient's general operating costs.
14. Using grant or matching funds for Individual Development
Accounts.
15. Purchasing vehicles.
Program Examples and Restrictions
The purpose of this initiative is to develop or increase the
recipient's capacity through a program of financial and technical
assistance to perform in the areas of housing, community facilities, or
community and economic development. Strengthening the recipient's
capacity in these areas will benefit the communities they serve. The
RCDI structure requires the intermediary (grantee) to provide a program
of financial and technical assistance to recipients. The recipients
will, in turn, provide programs to their communities (beneficiaries).
The following are examples of eligible and ineligible purposes under
the RCDI program. (These examples are illustrative and are not meant to
limit the activities proposed in the application. Activities that meet
the objectives of the RCDI program will be considered eligible.)
1. The intermediary must work directly with the recipient, not the
ultimate beneficiaries. As an example: The intermediary provides
training to the recipient on how to conduct homeownership education
classes. The recipient then provides ongoing homeownership education to
the residents of the community--the ultimate beneficiaries. This
``train the trainer'' concept fully meets the intent of this
initiative. The intermediary is providing technical assistance that
will build the recipient's capacity by enabling them to conduct
homeownership education classes for the public. This is an eligible
purpose. However, if the intermediary directly provided homeownership
education classes to individuals in the recipient's service area, this
would not be an eligible purpose because the recipient would be
bypassed.
2. If the intermediary is working with a low-income community as
the recipient, the intermediary must provide the technical assistance
to the entity that represents the low-income community and is
identified in the application. Examples of entities representing a low-
income community are a village board or a town council. If the
intermediary provides technical assistance to the Board of the low-
income community on how to establish a cooperative, this would be an
eligible purpose. However, if the intermediary works directly with
individuals from the community to establish the cooperative, this is
not an eligible purpose. The recipient's capacity is built by learning
skills that will enable them to support sustainable economic
development in their communities on an ongoing basis.
3. The intermediary may provide technical assistance to the
recipient on how to create and operate a revolving loan fund. The
intermediary may not monitor or operate the revolving loan fund. RCDI
funds, including matching funds, cannot be used to fund revolving loan
funds.
4. The intermediary may work with recipients in building their
capacity to provide planning and leadership development training. The
recipients of this training would be expected to assume leadership
roles in the development and execution of regional strategic plans. The
intermediary would work with multiple recipients in helping communities
recognize their connections to the greater regional and national
economies.
5. The intermediary could provide training and technical assistance
to the recipients on developing emergency shelter and feeding, short-
term housing, search and rescue, and environmental accident,
prevention, and cleanup program plans. For longer term disaster and
economic crisis responses, the intermediary could work with the
recipients to develop job placement and training programs, and develop
coordinated transit systems for displaced workers.
Part IV--Application and Submission Information for the Traditional
RCDI Program
A. Address To Request Application Package
Entities wishing to apply for assistance may download the
application documents and requirements delineated in this Notice from
the RCDI Web site: https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rhs/rcdi. Application
information for electronic submissions may be found at https://www.grants.gov. Applicants may also request paper application packages
from the Rural Development office in their state. A list of Rural
Development State offices is included in this Notice.
B. Content and Form of Application Submission
If the applicant is ineligible or the application is incomplete,
the Agency will inform the applicant in writing of the decision,
reasons therefore, and its
[[Page 16523]]
appeal rights and no further evaluation of the application will occur.
A complete application for RCDI funds must include the following:
1. A summary page, double-spaced between items, listing the
following: (This information should not be presented in narrative
form.)
a. Applicant's name,
b. Applicant's address,
c. Applicant's telephone number,
d. Name of applicant's contact person and telephone number,
e. Applicant's fax number,
f. County where applicant is located,
g. Congressional district number where applicant is located,
h. Amount of grant request, and
i. Number of recipients
2. A detailed Table of Contents containing page numbers for each
component of the application.
3. A project overview, no longer than five pages, including the
following items, which will also be addressed separately and in detail
under ``Building Capacity'' of the ``Evaluation Criteria.''
a. The type of technical assistance to be provided to the
recipients and how it will be implemented.
b. How the capacity and ability of the recipients will be improved.
c. The overall goals to be accomplished.
d. The benchmarks to be used to measure the success of the program.
Benchmarks should be specific and quantifiable.
4. Organizational documents, such as a certificate of incorporation
and a current good standing certification from the Secretary of State
where the applicant is incorporated and other similar and valid
documentation of non-profit status, from the intermediary that confirms
it has been legally organized for a minimum of 3 years as the applicant
entity.
5. Verification of source and amount of matching funds, i.e., a
copy of a bank statement if matching funds are in cash or a copy of the
confirmed funding commitment from the funding source. The verification
must show that matching funds are available for the duration of the
grant performance period. The verification of matching funds must be
submitted with the application or the application will be considered
incomplete.
The applicant will be contacted by the Agency prior to grant award
to verify that the matching funds provided with the application
continue to be available. The applicant will have 15 working days from
the date contacted to submit verification that matching funds continue
to be available. If the applicant is unable to provide the verification
within that timeframe, the application will be considered ineligible.
The applicant must maintain bank statements on file or other
documentation for a period of at least three years after grant closing
except that the records shall be retained beyond the three-year period
if audit findings have not been resolved.
6. The following information for each recipient:
a. Recipient's entity name,
b. Complete address (mailing and physical location, if different),
c. County where located,
d. Number of Congressional district where recipient is located,
e. Contact person's name and telephone number, and
f. Form RD 400-4, ``Assurance Agreement.'' If the Form RD 400-4 is
not submitted for a recipient, the recipient will be considered
ineligible. No information pertaining to that recipient will be
included in the income or population scoring criteria and the requested
funding may be adjusted due to the deletion of the recipient.
7. Submit evidence that each recipient entity is eligible:
a. Nonprofits--provide a current valid letter confirming non-profit
status from the Secretary of the State of incorporation or the IRS, a
current good standing certification from the Secretary of the State of
incorporation, or other valid documentation of nonprofit status of each
recipient.
b. Low-income rural community--provide evidence the entity is a
public body, and a copy of the 2000 census data to verify the
population, and evidence that the median household income is at, or
below, 80 percent of either the State or the national income. We will
only accept data and printouts from https://www.census.gov. The specific
instructions to retrieve data from this site are detailed under the
``Evaluation Criteria'' for ``Population'' and ``Income.''
c. Federally recognized tribes--provide the page listing their name
from the Federal Register list of tribal entities published by the
Bureau of Indian Affairs on October 1, 2010 (75 FR 60810) or a
subsequent updated list or supplement in the Federal Register. If a
tribe has been federally recognized since the last list of federally
recognized tribes was published in the Federal Register, appropriate
documentation from the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian
Affairs must be submitted that legally verifies that recognition.
8. Each of the ''Evaluation Criteria'' must be addressed
specifically and individually by category. Present these criteria in
narrative form. Documentation must be limited to three pages per
criterion. The ``Population'' and ``Income'' criterions for recipient
locations can be provided in the form of a list; however, the source of
the data must be included on the page(s).
9. A timeline identifying specific activities and proposed dates
for completion.
10. A detailed project budget that includes the RCDI grant amount
and matching funds. This should be a line-item budget, by category.
Categories such as salaries, administrative, other, and indirect costs
that pertain to the proposed project must be clearly defined.
Supporting documentation listing the components of these categories
must be included. The budget should be dated: year 1, year 2, year 3,
as applicable.
11. Form SF-424, ``Application for Federal Assistance.'' (Do not
complete Form SF-424A, ``Budget Information.'' A separate line-item
budget should be presented as described in No. 10 of this section.)
12. Form SF-424B, ``Assurances--Non-Construction Programs.''
13. Form AD-1047, ``Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
and Other Responsibility Matters--Primary Covered Transactions.''
14. Form AD-1048, ``Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier Covered
Transactions.''
15. Form AD-1049, ``Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements.''
16. Certification of Non-Lobbying Activities.
17. Standard Form LLL, ``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,'' if
applicable.
18. Form RD 400-4, ``Assurance Agreement,'' for the applicant.
19. Identify and report any association or relationship with Rural
Development employees.
20. For grants, the applicant's Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering Systems (DUNS) number and registration in the Central
Contractor Registration (CCR) database in accordance with 2 CFR part
25. As required by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), all grant
applications must provide a DUNS number when applying for Federal
grants, on or after October 1, 2003. Organizations can receive a DUNS
number at no cost by calling the dedicated toll-free number at 1-866-
705-5711 or via Internet at http:www.dnb.com/us/. Additional
information concerning this requirement can be obtained on the
Grants.gov Web Site at https://www.grants.gov. Similarly, applicants
[[Page 16524]]
may register for the CCR at https://uscontractingregistration.com or by
calling 1-877-252-2700.
The required forms and certifications can be downloaded from the
RCDI Web site at: https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rhs/rcdi.
C. Other Submission Information
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants, OMB No. 1894-
0010 Exp. 05/31/2012 (applies only to non-profit applicants only--
submission is optional).
The original application package must be submitted to the Rural
Development State Office where the applicant's headquarters is located.
A listing of Rural Development State Offices is included in this
Notice. Applications will not be accepted via FAX or electronic mail.
Applicants may file an electronic application at https://www.grants.gov. Grants.gov contains full instructions on all required
passwords, credentialing, and software. Follow the instructions at
Grants.gov for registering and submitting an electronic application.
If a system problem or technical difficulty occurs with an
electronic application, please use the customer support resources
available at the Grants.gov Web site.
Technical difficulties submitting an application through Grants.gov
will not be a reason to extend the application deadline. If an
application is unable to be submitted through Grants.gov, a paper
application must be received in the appropriate Rural Development State
Office by the deadline noted previously.
First time Grants.gov users should carefully read and follow the
registration steps listed on the Web site. These steps need to be
initiated early in the application process to avoid delays in
submitting your application online.
In order to register with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR),
your organization will need a DUNS number. Be sure to complete the
Marketing Partner ID (MPID) and Electronic Business Primary Point of
Contact fields during the CCR registration process. These are mandatory
fields that are required when submitting grant applications through
Grants.gov. Additional application instructions for submitting an
electronic application can be found by selecting this funding
opportunity on Grants.gov.
The deadline for receipt of an application is May 9 by 4 p.m. local
time. The application deadline date and time are firm and apply to
submission of the original application to the Rural Development State
Office where the applicant's headquarters is located. The Agency will
not consider any application received after the deadline. A listing of
Rural Development State Offices, their addresses, telephone numbers,
and contact person is provided elsewhere in this Notice. Applicants
intending to mail applications must allow sufficient time to permit
delivery on or before the closing deadline date and time. Acceptance by
the United States Postal Service or private mailer does not constitute
delivery. Fax, electronic mail or postage due applications will not be
accepted.
D. Funding Restrictions
Meeting expenses. In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 1345, ``Expenses of
Meetings,'' appropriations may not be used for travel, transportation,
and subsistence expenses for a meeting. RCDI grant funds cannot be used
for these meeting-related expenses. Matching funds may be used to pay
for these expenses. RCDI funds may be used to pay for a speaker as part
of a program, equipment to facilitate the program, and the actual room
that will house the meeting. RCDI funds can be used for travel,
transportation, or subsistence expenses for program-related training
and technical assistance purposes. Any training not delineated in the
application must be approved by the Agency to verify compliance with 31
U.S.C. 1345. Travel and per diem expenses will be similar to those paid
to Agency employees. Rates are based upon location. Rate information
can be obtained from the applicable Rural Development State Office.
Grantees and recipients will be restricted to traveling coach class
on common carrier airlines. When lodging is not available at the
government rate, grantees and recipients may exceed the Government rate
for lodging by a maximum of 20 percent. Meals and incidental expenses
will be reimbursed at the same rate used by Agency employees. Mileage
and gas reimbursement will be the same rate used by Agency employees.
This rate may be obtained from the applicable Rural Development State
Office.
Part V--Application Review Information for the Traditional RCDI Program
A. Evaluation Criteria
Applications will be evaluated using the following criteria and
weights:
1. Building Capacity--Maximum 60 Points
The applicant must demonstrate how they will improve the
recipients' capacity, through a program of financial and technical
assistance, as it relates to the RCDI purposes. Capacity-building
financial and technical assistance should provide new functions to the
recipients or expand existing functions that will enable the recipients
to undertake projects in the areas of housing, community facilities, or
community and economic development that will benefit the community. The
program of financial and technical assistance provided, its delivery,
and the measurability of the program's effectiveness will determine the
merit of the application. All applications will be competitively ranked
with the applications providing the most improvement in capacity
development and measurable activities being ranked the highest.
Capacity-building financial and technical assistance may include, but
is not limited to: training to conduct community development programs,
e.g., homeownership education, or the establishment of minority
business entrepreneurs, cooperatives, or micro-enterprises;
organizational development, e.g., assistance to develop or improve
board operations, management, and financial systems; instruction on how
to develop and implement a strategic plan; instruction on how to access
alternative funding sources to increase leveraging opportunities;
staffing, e.g., hiring a person at intermediary or recipient level to
provide technical assistance to recipients.
a. The narrative response must:
i. Describe the nature of financial and technical assistance to be
provided to the recipients and the activities that will be conducted to
deliver the technical assistance;
ii. Explain how financial and technical assistance will develop or
increase the recipient's capacity. Indicate whether a new function is
being developed or if existing functions are being expanded or
performed more effectively;
iii. Identify which RCDI purpose areas will be addressed with this
assistance: housing, community facilities, or community and economic
development; and
iv. Describe how the results of the technical assistance will be
measured. What benchmarks will be used to measure effectiveness?
Benchmarks should be specific and quantifiable.
[[Page 16525]]
b. The maximum 60 points for this criterion will be broken down as
follows:
i. Type of financial and technical assistance and implementation
activities. 35 points.
ii. An explanation of how financial and technical assistance will
develop capacity. 10 points.
iii. Identification of the RCDI purpose. 5 points.
iv. Measurement of outcomes. 10 points.
2. Expertise--Maximum 30 Points
The applicant must demonstrate that it has conducted programs of
financial and technical assistance and achieved measurable results in
the areas of housing, community facilities, or community and economic
development in rural areas. Provide the name, contact information, and
the type and amount of the financial and technical assistance the
applicant organization has provided to the following for the last 3
years:
a. Nonprofit organizations in rural areas.
b. Low-income communities in rural areas, (also include the type of
entity, e.g., city government, town council, or village board).
c. Federally recognized tribes or any other culturally diverse
organizations.
3. Population--Maximum 30 Points
Population is based on the average population from the 2000 census
data for the communities in which the recipients are located. The
physical address, not mailing address, for each recipient must be used
for this criterion. Community is defined for scoring purposes as a
city, town, village, county, parish, borough, or census-designated
place where the recipient's office is physically located. The applicant
must submit the census data from the following Web site in the form of
a printout of the applicable ``Fact Sheet'' to verify the population
figures used for each recipient. The data can be accessed on the
Internet at https://www.census.gov; click on ``American FactFinder''
from the left menu; click on ``Fact Sheet'' from the left menu; at the
right, fill in one or more fields and click ``Go''; the name and
population data for each recipient location must be listed in this
section. The average population of the recipient locations will be used
and will be scored as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scoring
Population (points)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5,000 or less............................................... 30
5,001 to 10,000............................................. 20
10,001 to 20,000............................................ 10
20,001 to 50,000............................................ 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Income--Maximum 30 Points
The average of the median household income for the communities
where the recipients are physically located will determine the points
awarded. The physical address, not mailing address, for each recipient
must be used for this criterion. Applicants may compare the average
recipient median household income to the State median household income
or the national median household income, whichever yields the most
points. The national median household income to be used is $41,994. The
applicant must submit the income data in the form of a printout of the
applicable information from the following Web site to verify the income
for each recipient. The data being used is from the 2000 census. The
data can be accessed on the Internet at https://www.census.gov; click on
``American FactFinder'' from the left menu; click on ``Fact Sheet''
from the left menu; at the right, fill in one or more fields and click
``Go''; the name and income data for each recipient location must be
listed in this section. Points will be awarded as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scoring
Average recipient median income (points)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than 60 percent of state or national median household 30
income.....................................................
From 60 to 70 percent of state or national median household 20
income.....................................................
Greater than 70 to 80 percent of state or national median 10
household income...........................................
In excess of 80 percent of state or national median 0
household income...........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Soundness of Approach--Maximum 50 Points
The applicant can receive up to 50 points for soundness of
approach. The overall proposal will be considered under this criterion.
Applicants must list the page numbers in the application that address
these factors.
The maximum 50 points for this criterion will be broken down as
follows:
a. The ability to provide the proposed financial and technical
assistance based on prior accomplishments has been demonstrated. 10
Points.
b. The proposed financial and technical assistance program is
clearly stated and the applicant has defined how this proposal will be
implemented. The plan for implementation is viable. 10 Points.
c. Cost effectiveness will be evaluated based on the budget in the
application. The proposed grant amount and matching funds should be
utilized to maximize capacity building at the recipient level. 15
points.
d. The proposal fits the objectives for which applications were
invited. 15 points.
6. Technical Assistance for the Development of Renewable Energy Systems
and Energy Efficiency Improvements--Maximum 20 Points
The applicant must demonstrate how they will improve the
recipients' capacity to carry out activities related to the development
of renewable energy systems and energy efficiency improvements for
housing, community facilities, or community and economic development.
7. Regional Collaboration Applications--Maximum 20 Points
The Agency encourages applications that promote substantive
economic growth, including job creation, as well as specifically
addressing the circumstances of those sectors within the region that
have fewer prospects and the greatest need for improved economic
opportunity.
A Regional Collaboration project should implement goals, objectives
or actions identified in a Regional Strategic Plan which addresses
priorities specified at a regional scale. Applications should
demonstrate:
a. Clear leadership at the Intermediary level in organizing and
coordinating a regional initiative;
b. Evidence that the Recipient's region has a common economic basis
that supports the likelihood of success in implementing its strategy;
c. Evidence that technical assistance will be provided that will
increase the Recipient's capacity to assess their circumstance,
determine a long term sustainable vision for the region, and implement
a comprehensive strategic plan, including identifying performance
measures and establishing a system to collect the data to allow
assessment of those performance measures.
8. Local Investment Points--Maximum 20 Points
Intermediaries must be physically located in an eligible rural
community and must include evidence of investment in the community. The
intent is to ensure that RCDI funds are expended in the rural
community.
9. State Director's Points Based on Project Merit--Maximum 20 Points
This criterion does not have to be addressed by the applicant. Up
to 20 points may be awarded by the Rural
[[Page 16526]]
Development State Director. Points may be awarded to more than one
application per state or jurisdiction. The total points awarded under
this criterion, to all applications, will not exceed 20. Assignment of
points will include a written justification and be tied to and awarded
based on how closely they align with the Rural Development State
Office's strategic plan.
10. Proportional Distribution Points--20 Points
This criterion does not have to be addressed by the applicant.
After applications have been evaluated and awarded points under the
first 9 criteria, the Agency may award 20 points per application to
promote an even distribution of grant awards between the ranges of
$50,000 to $300,000.
B. Review and Selection Process
Rating and ranking. Applications will be rated and ranked on a
national basis by a review panel based on the ``Evaluation Criteria''
contained in this Notice. If there is a tied score after the
applications have been rated and ranked, the tie will be resolved by
reviewing the scores for ``Building Capacity'' and the applicant with
the highest score in that category will receive a higher ranking. If
the scores for ``Building Capacity'' are the same, the scores will be
compared for the next criterion, in sequential order, until one highest
score can be determined.
Initial screening. The Agency will screen each application to
determine eligibility during the period immediately following the
application deadline. Listed below are examples of reasons for
rejection from previous funding rounds. The following reasons for
rejection are not all inclusive; however, they represent the majority
of the applications previously rejected.
1. Recipients were not located in eligible rural areas based on the
definition in this Notice.
2. Applicants failed to provide evidence of recipient's status,
i.e., documentation supporting nonprofit evidence of organization.
3. Applicants failed to provide evidence of committed matching
funds or matching funds were not committed for a period at least equal
to the grant performance period.
4. Application did not follow the RCDI structure with an
intermediary and recipients.
5. Recipients were not identified in the application.
6. Intermediary did not provide evidence it had been incorporated
for at least 3 years as the applicant entity.
7. Applicants failed to address the ``Evaluation Criteria.''
8. The purpose of the proposal did not qualify as an eligible RCDI
purpose.
9. Inappropriate use of funds (e.g., construction or renovations).
10. The applicant proposed providing financial and technical
assistance directly to individuals.
11. The application package not received by closing date and time.
Part VI--Rural Jobs Accelerator and Innovation Challenge Application
Process
An application for ``Rural Jobs and Innovation Accelerator
Challenge'' funds must be submitted to USDA and EDA by an organization
or a team of organizations that is individually or collectively
eligible to receive funding from USDA and EDA.
Required Application Forms and Content
To be considered complete, an application package must consist of:
(1) Required forms as discussed below;
(2) Project Narrative; and
(3) Addenda to the Project Narrative.
Applications that do not contain all required forms listed below,
or that fail to adhere to the instructions in this Notice, will be
considered non-responsive and will not be considered for funding.
Additional application materials not requested under this Notice will
not be reviewed or evaluated.
Applicants are advised to carefully read the instructions contained
in this Notice and in all forms contained in the application package.
It is the sole responsibility of each applicant to ensure that a
complete application package is received.
Required Forms
All applicants are required to submit the following forms at the
time of application. The forms should be uploaded as separate portable
document format (PDF) files. Forms are available in the application
package at www.grants.gov or on the Rural Jobs Accelerator Web site
under `application submission information'.
Each USDA applicant must submit the following forms.
Form SF-424--Application for Federal Assistance for the
applicant
Form SF-424A--Budget Information- Non-Construction Programs
for the applicant
Form SF-424B--Assurances--Non-Construction Programs for the
applicant
Form CD-511--Certification Regarding Lobbying for the USDA and
EDA applicant
Form RD-400-4--Assurance Agreement, for the applicant and each
RCDI Recipient
Form AD-1047--Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
and Other Responsibility Matters--Primary Covered Transactions
Form AD-1048--Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension,
Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier Covered Transactions
Form AD-1049--Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements
Identity and report any association or relationship with Rural
Development employees.
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants, OMB No.
1894-0010 Exp. 05/13/2012 (applies only to non-profit applicants--
submission is optional)
Form SF-LLL--Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, if applicable
Project Description
The Project Description must demonstrate the applicant's capability
to implement the proposed activities in accordance with the
requirements of this NOFA. The Project Description must demonstrate how
each scope of work (individually funded by each Funding Agency) is
integrated into an overarching project.
The full Project Description must include the following components:
Executive Summary:
Not to exceed two pages, the Executive Summary will serve as a
summary of the proposed project and may be shared publicly in the form
originally submitted; therefore, applicants should not include
proprietary, confidential commercial/business, and personally
identifiable information. The Executive Summary must include the
following sections: (a) The project name; (b) the organizations
composing the Applicant Team; (c) the identified region and cluster;
(d) a summary of the integrated project and project objectives; (e) a
brief description of the scopes of work to be funded by each funding
source and the associated performance measures; and (f) a summary of
how the capacity of the recipients will be improved and the regional
strength will be increased.
Project Narrative:
The Project Narrative should be a detailed description of all
activities that will be undertaken by all sources of funds requested
under this solicitation. Within the Project Narrative, applicants
[[Page 16527]]
should address all the evaluation criteria, as outlined in section
VI.A:
1. Region and Cluster of Focus;
2. Integrated Project Concept/Overview;
3. Building Community and Regional Capacity (USDA scope of work);
4. Developing Regional Links (EDA scope of work);
5. ARC or DRA scope of work (only applicable to applicants seeking
funding from ARC or DRA);
6. Project Impact and Measurable Outcomes; and
7. Soundness of Approach.
The length of the Project Narrative is limited to 25 double-spaced,
8.5 x 11 inch pages with 12-point font and 1-inch margins. Applicants
may include a map delineating the region at the end of the Project
Narrative, which will not count towards the 25 page limit. Any Project
Narrative text beyond the specified page limit will not be read.
Applicants must number the pages of the Project Narrative, beginning
with page number 1. The Project Narrative should be submitted as one
PDF file, and only one Project Narrative should be submitted per
application. Note: the page limit described in this section may be
increased to 30 pages if the Applicant Team is also seeking funding
from ARC or DRA.
Integrated Work Plan
Applicants must input details of proposed activities under each
scope of work from the Project Narrative, as well as expected/estimated
impacts of the activities, into an Integrated Work Plan.
Budget Description
A separate budget narrative must be created and submitted to
support the scope of work for each Funding Agency, and each narrative
must provide a description of costs associated with each line item on
each Form SF-424A over the project period. Supporting documentation
listing the components of these categories must be included. The budget
should be dated: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, as applicable. The budget
narrative should include a personnel plan listing all positions that
will be charged to the Federal and non-Federal portion of the budget
for each year of the applicable project period. The personnel plan must
include the position titles, salaries, percentage of time dedicated to
the project, and amount of salary charged to the project for each staff
member assigned to the project. The sum of all salaries charged to the
project must equal the amount on the ``Personnel'' budget line item on
Form SF-424A. The personnel plan should provide a description of how
the personnel will carry out the proposed plan, including the adequacy
and previous performance of the proposed team to carry out project
activities.
Addenda to the Project Description
The applicant must also submit the following required addenda to
the Project Description in PDF file.
The required addenda to the Project Description are:
Resumes of Key Personnel (by Funding Agency): Applicants
must provide resumes for key personnel staff which generally should not
exceed two pages in length (per resume). Applicants also should provide
a 2 page summary description of all personnel (performing for the
applicant) and contractors named in the application. Resumes should be
uploaded as one PDF file.
Verification of Matching Funds
[cir] Verification of source and amount of matching funds: Each
USDA applicant must provide verification of source and amount of
matching funds, i.e., a copy of a bank statement if matching funds are
in cash or a copy of the confirmed funding commitment from the funding
source. The verification must show that matching funds are available
for the duration of the grant performance period. The verification of
matching funds must be submitted with the application or the
application will be considered incomplete.
Applicant Team Written Agreement: If the USDA Applicant is applying
for funds under this Notice in partnership with and EDA applicant, the
Applicant Team must provide a copy of the written agreement signed by
each team member that reflects a binding commitment to undertake the
proposed project, the respective scopes of work, and perform the roles
and responsibilities identified in the Project Narrative. The Agreement
must include the project title and list each applicant and the source
of funds they are applying for.
Facilities and Administrative or Indirect Cost Rate
Agreement
[cir] The indirect cost category in the project budget should be
used only when a grant applicant has a federally negotiated indirect
cost rate. A copy of the current rate agreement must be provided with
the application.
Non-profit organizations: Non-profit organizations
applying for funding must submit the following, addition to all items
listed above.
[cir] Organization documents, such as a certificate of
incorporation and a current good standing certification from the
Secretary of State where the applicant is incorporated and other
similar and valid documentation of non-profit status, from the
intermediary that confirms it has been legally organized for a minimum
of 3 years as the applicant entity.
Recipient Information: Applicants must provide the
following information for each recipient. Please combine into a single
PDF file.
1. A summary page, double-spaced between items, listing the
following for each recipient (this information should not be presented
in narrative form):
a. Recipient's entity name;
b. Complete address (mailing and physical location, if different);
c. County where located;
d. Number of Congressional district where recipient is located; and
e. Contact person's name and telephone number.
2. Submit evidence that each recipient entity is eligible:
a. Nonprofits--provide a current valid letter confirming non-profit
status from the Secretary of the State of incorporation or the IRS, a
current good standing certification from the Secretary of the State of
incorporation, or other valid documentation of nonprofit status of each
recipient.
b. Low-income rural community--provide evidence the entity is a
public body, and a copy of the most recent available census data to
verify the population, and evidence that the median household income is
at, or below, 80 percent of the national median household income. We
will only accept data and printouts from https://www.census.gov. The
specific instructions to retrieve data from this site are detailed
under the ``Evaluation Criteria'' for ``Population'' and ``Income.''
c. Federally recognized tribes--provide the page listing their name
from the Federal Register list of tribal entities published by the
Bureau of Indian Affairs on October 1, 2010 (75 FR 60810) or a
subsequent updated list or supplement in the Federal Register. If a
tribe has been federally recognized since the last list of federally
recognized tribes was published in the Federal Register, appropriate
documentation from the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian
Affairs must be submitted that legally verifies that recognition.
Part VII--Application Review Process for the Rural Jobs Accelerator
Challenge
Evaluation Criteria
Applications will be evaluated based on their ability to satisfy
the following core evaluation criteria, with each criterion assigned
the points indicated.
[[Page 16528]]
1. Region and Cluster of Focus (15 Points)
The applicant must describe the region of focus (see page 4) for
which the funding is requested, including the economics, clusters, and
the networks and assets that contribute to the region's competitiveness
and potential for growth.
The narrative response must:
Clearly describe the geographic region of the proposed
project. Regions may be single or multi-jurisdictional areas.
Applicants have the flexibility to define their region based on
quantitative and qualitative information about where and how the
cluster targeted for development operates.\1\ The region description
should include the location of project recipients for the Building
Community and Regional Capacity activity. Applicants should provide
information about areas and/or sectors of economic distress.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Regions can be non-contiguous (e.g., cluster ``anchor'' in
one region with networked assets such as research partnerships with
federal labs or supply chain linkages in other regions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present a compelling description of the economics of the
region and the specific cluster that will be targeted by the proposed
project. This should demonstrate that the region possesses unique
assets to support the cluster and has a competitive advantage in the
identified industry and identify any specific economic needs and
opportunities for growth. Applicants should include evidence of a
concentration of firms in the identified industry sector, available
industry-specific infrastructure that support the cluster, and clear
leadership at the regional level in organizing and coordinating a
region-wide initiative.
[cir] Fully describe existing regional partnerships that directly
engaged in supporting the targeted cluster, including a discussion of
the extent of participation and effectiveness:
[cir] Private sector leadership and significant participation in
cluster activities;
[cir] Any and all cluster intermediary organization, such as an
economic development organization, workforce development board,
business incubator or accelerator, chamber of commerce, or a
university-based consortium;
[cir] Universities, federally funded labs, or privately funded
research and development centers;
[cir] Federally funded program or center, such as a Manufacturing
Extension Partnership Center (MEP), Small Business Development Center,
and Preferred Sustainability Status holders within the Partnership for
Sustainable Communities;
[cir] Venture development organizations, venture capital firms,
revolving loan funders, angel investment groups, community lenders,
community development financial institutions, and other institutions
focused on expanding access to capital;
[cir] Local and municipal governments, workforce development
entities, communities colleges, and community-based organizations; and
[cir] Private foundations focused on economic or community
development, science, business, and innovation.
2. Integrated Project Concept (10 Points)
Applicants must provide an Integrated Project Concept, which is a
narrative summary that describes the proposed project with a maximum of
5 pages.
The narrative response must:
a. Present how the applicant intends to leverage and utilize
multiple resources to meet project objectives, address identified needs
and capitalize on opportunities;
b. Clearly express how the proposed scopes of work will complement
each other in accelerating competitiveness in rural regions;
c. Describe how the project will promote substantive economic
growth, including job creation.
Note: Applicants requesting ARC or DRA funds must also include
or incorporate the proposed ARC or DRA scopes of work in their
Integrated Project Concept.
3. Building Community and Regional Capacity (20 Points)
The applicant must demonstrate how they will apply USDA funds to
improve the recipients' capacity, through a program of financial and
technical assistance, as it related to the RCDI purposes. Capacity-
building financial and technical assistance should provide new
functions to the recipients or expand existing functions that will
enable the recipients to undertake projects in the areas of housing,
community facilities, or community and economic development that will
benefit the community. The proposed program of financial and technical
assistance provided, its delivery, and the measurability of its
effectiveness will determine the merit of the application.
Capacity-building financial and technical assistance may include:
Training to conduct community development programs, e.g., the
establishment of minority business entrepreneurs, cooperatives, or
micro-enterprises; organizational development, e.g., assistance to
develop or improve board operations, management, and financial systems;
instruction on how to develop and implement a strategic plan;
instruction on how to access alternative funding sources to increase
leveraging opportunities; staffing, e.g., hiring a person at
intermediary or recipient level to provide technical assistance to
recipients.
The narrative response must:
a. Describe the nature of financial and technical assistance to be
provided to the recipients and the activities that will be conducted to
deliver the technical assistance;
b. Explain how financial and technical assistance will develop or
increase the recipient's capacity. Indicate whether a new function is
being developed or if existing functions are being expanded or
performed more effectively;
c. Identify which RCDI purpose areas will be addressed with this
assistance: Housing, community facilities, or community and economic
development.
d. Demonstrate that the applicant has conducted programs of
financial and technical assistance and achieved measurable results in
the areas of housing, community facilities, or community and economic
development in rural areas. Provide the name, contact information, and
the type and amount of the financial and technical assistance the
applicant organization has provided to the following for the last 3
years:
[cir] Nonprofit organizations in the rural areas.
[cir] Low-income communities in rural areas (also include the type
of entity, e.g., city government, town council or village board).
[cir] Federally recognized tribes or any other culturally diverse
organizations.
4. Linking to Regional Clusters and Opportunities (20 Points)
The applicant must demonstrate how they will utilize EDA funds to
link rural communities to markets, networks, industry clusters, and
other regional opportunities and assets to improve the rural regions'
competitiveness, repatriate U.S. jobs, foster job creation, retain
existing jobs, support innovation, and promote private investment in
the regional economy.
The narrative response must:
a. Describe the proposed activity to be implemented by the
applicant and how it will link rural regions to the identified clusters
and opportunities;
b. Explain how the proposed activity will address an identified
need or opportunity to meet activity objectives,
[[Page 16529]]
including supporting innovation and job growth;
c. Explain how the activity will implement goals, objectives or
actions identified in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy or
Regional Strategic Plan which addresses priorities specified at a
regional scale;
d. Note the entity or entities that will oversee activity
development and implementation and demonstrate that these entities have
experience in the proposed activities and achieved measurable results
in the areas of regional development and cluster development; and
e. Demonstrate financial resources to ensure institutional capacity
to support the projects in the long-term, without significant future
Federal funding.
5. Project Impact and Measurable Outcomes (20 Points)
Applications funded under this competitive solicitation are
expected to identify clear goals and demonstrate potential for
substantial benefits. While each funding source will identify
performance metrics that applicants must track and report, applicants
are encouraged to identify additional metrics that can be used to
assess the impact of requested funding. Applicants must also describe
mechanisms for tracking and reporting on these outcomes.
Applicants are required to submit an Integrated Work Plan (IWP) as
part of their submission package. The IWP is designed to document the
key activities that will be supported by Funding Agency, the
anticipated dates these activities will be completed, and the
anticipated core impacts that each activity is expected to yield in the
short-term (during the 3 year project period) and the long-term (within
three years after project end date). The impacts set forth in the IWP
should be forecasts based on each activity; grantees will be required
to report on progress towards reaching these forecasts throughout the
life of the project.
Applicants should utilize the Excel-based IWP template available on
the Rural Jobs Accelerator Web site, https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/RuralJobsAccelerator. Each measure should be broken down by funding
source (i.e. EDA, USDA, ARC, and DRA), clearly linking proposed funding
to specific outcomes. A copy of the IWP template is included as
Attachment A to this FFO for reference (please note how activities,
expected deadlines, and anticipated impacts are separately reported for
each funding agency).
All applicants are required to utilize and include the following
measures in their IWP to report on anticipated project impacts:
Jobs Created during the Project Period--Applicants should
include an estimate of the number of jobs that will be created during
the three year project period as a direct result of funding from one of
the Funding Partners. Anticipated jobs created should be reported as
full time equivalent (FTE) or equivalents which are annualized for the
entire project period.
Jobs Retained during the Project Period--Applicants should
include an estimate of the number of jobs expected to be retained
during the three year project period as a direct result of funding from
each of the Funding Partners. Anticipated jobs retained should be
reported as FTEs or equivalents which are annualized for the entire
project period.
Private Investment Leverage during the Project Period--
Applicants should include an estimate of the amount of private
investment that will be leveraged during the three year project period
as a direct result of funding from one of the Funding Partners.
Businesses Assisted during the Project Period--Applicants
should include an estimate of the number of businesses expected to be
assisted during the three year project period as a direct result of
funding from one of the Funding Partners.
Engagement and Collaboration of Regional Organizations--
Applicants should include an estimate of the number and types of
organizations within the region expected to be engaged in the project
during the three year project period.
Long-term Jobs Created--Applicants should include an
estimate of the number of jobs expected to be created within three
years after project is completed (within six years from project
inception) that result from funding from one of the Funding Partners.
Anticipated long-term jobs created should be reported as FTEs or
equivalents which are annualized for the entire six year period since
the original grant award.
Long-term Jobs Retained--Applicants should include an
estimate of the number of jobs expected to be retained within three
years after project is completed (within six years from project
inception) that result from funding from one of the Funding Partners.
Anticipated long-term jobs retained should be reported as FTEs or
equivalents which are annualized for the entire six year period since
the original grant award.
Long-term Private Investment Leveraged--Applicants should
include an estimate of the amount of private investment that will be
leveraged within three years after project is completed (within six
years from project inception) that result from funding from one of the
Funding Partners. Funds reported should reflect the cumulative amount
of private investment anticipated to be leveraged for the entire six
year period since the original grant award.
Long-term Businesses Assisted--Applicants should include
an estimate of the number of businesses that will be assisted three
years after project is completed (within six years from project
inception) that result from funding from one of the Funding Partners.
Additionally, applicants are encouraged to provide other self-
identified measures within the IWP which are specific to their proposed
project activities. Such measures should align with the objectives of
the individual project, as well as the overall Rural Jobs Accelerator
initiative. For example, applicants may consider the following types of
measures:
Cooperation:
[cir] Number of organizations actively engaged in the cluster (and
new ones added to the network)
[cir] Number of symposia held by the cluster
[cir] Number of further cooperative agreements as a result of the
supported activity
Innovation:
[cir] Number of new projects developed
[cir] Number of education and training activities related to
innovation
[cir] Number of workshops and seminars related to innovation
Workforce Skills:
[cir] Percentage of employees for which training was provided by
this project
[cir] Average number of qualified applicants per job
[cir] Number of recruitment events at universities and community
colleges
Business Creation:
[cir] Number of newly formed businesses as a result of the
supported activity
[cir] Number of jobs relocated from outside the U.S. to the region
Housing Support:
[cir] Change in available housing units in supported communities
Access to Capital:
[cir] Amount and number of new equity investments in cluster firms
[cir] Amount and number of new loans to cluster firms
Market Development:
[cir] Dollar increase in exports resulting from the project
activities
Applicants should note that the submitted IWP and associated
information will form the basis by
[[Page 16530]]
which selected projects will be monitored. Grantees will be required to
submit regular reports to the Funding Partners which document project
progress against the scopes of work, deadlines, and short-term measures
outlined in the original IWP. Reporting requirements will be outlined
in the terms and conditions of the grant award.
Applicant teams requesting funding from ARC or DRA should include
measures for those funding agencies in the IWP.
Evaluation criterion for this section will be based on the
following:
a. Includes specific and quantifiable measures of project impacts
that benefit the regional economy and will support the cluster;
b. Presents measures that are relevant to the proposed scopes of
work and objectives;
c. Presents measures that will help monitor progress towards
meeting the objectivities of the Rural Jobs Accelerator; and
d. Presents practical and clear tracking and reporting mechanisms.
6. Soundness of Approach (15 Points)
The overall proposal will be considered under this criterion.
Applicants must list the page numbers in the application that address
these factors.
The narrative response must demonstrate:
a. The ability to implement the proposed scopes of work based on
prior accomplishments has been demonstrated for both Building Community
and Regional Capacity and Regional Linkages scopes of work.
b. The proposed technical assistance program and regional linkages
program is clearly stated and the application has defined how this
proposal will be implemented. The plan for implementation is viable for
both Building Community and Regional Capacity and Regional Linkages
scopes of work.
c. Cost effectiveness will be evaluated based on the budget in the
application for both Building Community and Regional Capacity and
Regional Linkages scopes of work. For the Building Community and
Regional Capacity activity the proposed grant amount and matching funds
should be utilized to maximize capacity building at the recipient
level.
d. The proposal fits the objectives for which applications were
invited.
Application and Eligibility Review
Each Funding Agency will conduct an initial application and
eligibility review of applications submitted and received by the
deadline Each Funding Agency will independently review applications to
ensure compliance with its agency-specific requirements. This review
will determine if the application satisfies: (a) All requirements for a
complete submission (including all required forms, documentation of
matching funds, and addenda to the Project Description); (b) agency-
specific eligibility criteria; and (c) agency-specific requirements for
permitted activities. Applications found to be responsive will be
forwarded for merit review.
Merit Review Panels
Upon completion of the application and eligibility review, Merit
Review Panels comprised of Federal employees from the Funding Agencies,
who will review and evaluate applications deemed responsive. Merit
Review Panels may also include experts from Support Agencies. The Merit
Review Panels will evaluate the applications against the evaluation
criteria enumerated. The Merit review Panels will award up to 100
points to each application, rank the applications by consensus, and
forward the evaluation findings and rankings to the Policy Review and
Recommendation Committee.
Policy Review and Recommendation Committee
Upon completion of the merit review, the Policy Review and
Recommendation Committee composed of senior officials from the Primary
Funding Agencies will review the top 30 ranked applications, or
approximately 5 per EDA Region. This Committee will evaluate the
applications based on how well they meet the purposes of the Rural Job
Accelerator initiative. They may consider such factors as, geographic
balance in distribution of program funds, balance of diverse project
types in the distribution of program funds, balanced funding for a
diverse group of organizations including smaller and rural
organizations that may form part of a broader consortium to serve
diverse populations, the availability of funds, the applicant's
performance under previous Federal financial assistance awards, and the
extent to which the applicant integrates and leverages multiple Federal
resources to effectively support rural region and cluster development.
For projects based within regions serviced by the Delta Regional
Authority and the Appalachian Regional Commission, the Policy Review
and Recommendation Committee will give additional consideration to
projects that fully integrate and leverage the resources provided by
these agencies. Based on these combined factors, the Policy Review and
Recommendation Committee will recommend approximately twenty
applications to the agency principals and selecting officials.
Agency Principals and Selecting Officials
Agency principals and selecting officials will work together to
make the final award determinations. The agency principals for the
Primary Funding agencies include the Assistant Secretary of Commerce
for Economic Development and the Undersecretary for Rural Development
of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Selecting officials are authorized to finalize funding decisions
and make awards. The USDA selecting official will be the Tammye
Trevino, Administrator for Rural Housing Service.
Selecting officials may follow the recommendations of the Policy
Review and Recommendation Committee, or may consider additional
information in making their selections. If a selecting official makes a
selection of an application that is not included in the set of
applications recommended by the Policy Review and Recommendation
Committee, the selecting official must document the rationale for the
decision in writing.
Unsuccessful Competition
On occasion, competitive solicitations or competitive panels
produce less than optimum results, such as a competition resulting in
the receipt of no applications, a competition resulting in the receipt
of only unresponsive or unqualified applications, or too few highly
rated applications. In the event that these conditions arise, the
Funding Agencies shall take the most time- and cost-effective approach
available that is in the best interest of the Federal government. This
includes (1) Re-competition, (2) re-paneling, or (3) formal
negotiation.
Transparency
The agencies and bureaus involved in this initiative are committed
to conducting a transparent grant award process and publicizing
information about investment decisions. Applicants are advised that
their respective applications and information related to its review and
evaluation may be shared publicly as permitted by law. In addition,
information about the grant award progress and related results may also
be made publicly available. USDA may release a list of Rural Jobs
[[Page 16531]]
Accelerator applicants including organization, project name, city and
state.
Additional information regarding the ``Rural Jobs and Innovation
Accelerator Challenge'' can be found at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/RuralJobsAccelerator.html.
Submission of Applications
An applicant may obtain the appropriate application package
electronically at Grants.gov. All components of the appropriate
application package may be accessed and downloaded (in a screen-
fillable format) at www.grants.gov/applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp.
The preferred electronic file format for attachments is PDF; however,
electronic files in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or Microsoft Excel
will also be accepted. The applicant must complete the Grants.gov
registration process to submit applications through Grants.gov;
however, please note that registration is not required for an applicant
to access, view, or download the application packages. Alternatively,
an applicant may request a paper application package by contacting the
USDA Rural Development State Office listed in this Notice.
Electronic Submission
The Primary Funding Agencies encourage electronic submission of
applications through Grants.gov. Applicants should not wait until the
application closing date to begin the registration and submission
process. In order to submit an application through Grants.gov,
applicants first must register for a Grants.gov user id and password.
Note that this registration process can take between three to five
business days or as long as two weeks if all steps are not completed in
a timely manner (see https://www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp). Applicants should register as organizations, not as
individuals. Please note that organizations already registered with
Grants.gov do not need to re-register; however, all registered
organizations must keep their Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
database registration up-to-date and must designate the person
submitting the application on behalf of the organization as an
Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR). See the following
discussion of AOR requirements in this section.
An application that is not validated and time-stamped by Grants.gov
by the applicable deadline will not be processed.
Applicants need to be aware that once an application is submitted,
it undergoes a validation process through Grants.gov in which the
application may be accepted or rejected by the system. The validation
process may take 24 to 48 hours to complete. Applications that contain
errors will be rejected by Grants.gov and will not be forwarded to the
Funding Agencies for review. The applicant must correct the error
before Grants.gov will accept and validate the application. The Funding
Agencies will not accept late applications that were rejected by
Grants.gov due to errors. Accordingly, the Funding Agencies strongly
suggest that applicants submit their applications at least four to five
days before the application deadline to allow the application to be
accepted and validated by Grants.gov and to allow time for errors to be
corrected. The Funding Agencies will consider the time-stamp on the
validation from Grants.gov as the official submission time.
AOR requirement. Applicants must register as organizations, not as
individuals, and must register at least one Authorized Organizational
Representative (AOR) for your organization. AORs registered at
Grants.gov are the only officials with the authority to submit
applications via Grants.gov. If the application is submitted to
Grants.gov by anyone other than your organization's AOR, it will be
rejected by Grants.gov and cannot be considered. Please note: An
Applicant Team must submit its application package using the registered
AOR for the organization applying for EDA funds.
The Funding Agencies will not accept late submissions caused by
Grants.gov registration issues, including CCR and AOR issues.
The following instructions provide step-by-step instructions for
accessing, completing, and submitting an application via Grants.gov.
Save the application package at regular intervals to avoid losing work.
a. Navigate to the URL www.grants.gov.
b. Select ``Apply for Grants'' from the left-hand menu at
Grants.gov.
c. Ensure that you have installed a Grants.gov compatible version
of Adobe Acrobat Reader on your computer. Incompatible versions of
Adobe Acrobat Reader may cause errors. Please see compatible versions
of Adobe Reader at https://grants.gov/help/download_software.jsp#adobe811.
d. Select the link ``Download a Grant Application'' package.
e. Enter [[``Rural Jobs Accelerator 2012'']] as the Funding
Opportunity Number and click on ``Download Package.''
f. Click on the ``Download'' link.
g. Click on ``Download Application Package.''
h. Save the application package to your computer or network drive.
Note that the application package file can be shared among multiple
users; however, each user must have a Grants.gov compatible version of
Adobe Acrobat Reader installed in order to save changes to the
application package.
i. Click on each of the documents in the ``Mandatory Documents''
box and, after selecting each one, click on the arrow to move these
into the ``Mandatory Documents for Submission'' box.
j. In the ``Optional Documents'' box, click on Form SF-LLL if non-
Federal funds have been or are planned to be used for lobbying in
connection with a covered federal transaction, including this
competitive solicitation and then move this to the ``Optional Documents
for Submission'' box. If you will submit your application via
Grants.gov, also click on ``Attachments'' and move this to the
``Optional Documents for Submission'' box. The Attachments Form also
allows applicants to attach the Project Description documents, forms,
and other documents required as addenda under this competition. Note
that if the applicant is not submitting electronically, the Project
Description documents and other required forms and addenda all must be
printed and submitted in hard copy via a CD or paper.
k. The application package should pre-populate with all selected
forms embedded. Complete all mandatory fields (highlighted in yellow)
on the forms. Note that mandatory fields will vary based on the type of
applicant and the type of assistance sought. On Form CD-511, type ``not
awarded yet'' in the ``project number'' field.
l. Attach the Project Description documents and other required
forms and addenda. Note, the mandatory USDA forms can be found on the
``Full Announcement'' tab, and must be included as attachments to the
application. The preferred electronic file format for the required
attachments is PDF; however, the Funding Agencies will accept
electronic files in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or Excel formats.
m. When all mandatory fields have been completed, scroll to the top
and click on ``Check Package for Errors.''
n. Click ``Save.''
o. Click ``Save and Submit.'' At this point, the registered AOR for
the EDA applicant must be connected to the Internet and will be
prompted to enter
[[Page 16532]]
the appropriate Grants.gov user id and password in order to
electronically submit the application.
Verify submission was successful. Applicants should save and print
written proof of an electronic submission made at Grants.gov.
Applicants can expect to receive multiple emails regarding the status
of their submission. Since email communication can be unreliable,
applicants must proactively check on the status of their application if
they do not receive email notifications within a day of submission. The
first email should confirm receipt of the application, and the second
should indicate that the application has either been successfully
validated by the system before transmission to the Funding Agencies or
has been rejected due to errors. Please note: That it can take up to
two business days after Grants.gov receives an application for
applicants to receive email notification of an error. An applicant will
receive a third email once EDA has retrieved an application from
Grants.gov.
Applicants should refrain from submitting multiple copies of the
same application package. Applicants should save and print both the
submitted application confirmation screen provided on Grants.gov, and
the confirmation email sent by Grants.gov when the application has been
successfully received and validated in the system. If an applicant
receives an email from Grants.gov indicating that the application was
received and subsequently validated, but does not receive an email from
Grants.gov indicating that EDA has retrieved the application package
within 72 hours of that email, the applicant may contact the
appropriate person listed in Appendix F. of this FFO to inquire if EDA
is in receipt of the submission.
It is the applicant's responsibility to verify that its submission
was received and validated successfully at Grants.gov. To see the date
and time your application was received, log on to Grants.gov and click
on the ``Track My Application'' link from the left-hand menu. For a
successful submission, the application must be received and validated
by Grants.gov, and an agency tracking number assigned. If your
application has a status of ``Received'' it is awaiting validation by
Grants.gov. Once validation is complete, the status will change to
``Validated'' or ``Rejected with Errors.'' If the status is ``Rejected
with Errors,'' your application has not been received successfully.
Some of the reasons Grants.gov may reject an application can be found
at https://www.grants.gov/applicants/submit_application_faqs.jsp.
Systems issues. If you experience a Grants.gov ``systems issue''
(technical problems or glitches with the Grants.gov Web site) that you
believe threatens your ability to complete a submission, please (a)
print any error message received and (b) call the Grants.gov Contact
Center at 1-800-518-4726 for immediate assistance. Ensure that you
obtain a case number regarding your communications with Grants.gov.
Please note: Problems with an applicant organization's computer system
or equipment are not considered ``systems issues.'' Similarly, an
applicant's failure to (a) complete the registration, (b) ensure that a
registered AOR with the EDA applicant submits the application, or (c)
notice receipt of an email message from Grants.gov, are not considered
systems issues. A Grants.gov ``systems issue'' is an issue occurring in
connection with the operations of Grants.gov itself, such as the
temporary loss of service by Grants.gov due to an unexpected volume of
traffic or failure of information technology systems, both of which are
highly unlikely.
Applicants should access the following link for assistance in
navigating Grants.gov and for a list of useful resources: https://www.grants.gov/help/help.jsp. Also, the following link lists frequently
asked questions (FAQs): www.grants.gov/applicants/submit_application_faqs.jsp. If you do not find an answer to your question under the
``Applicant FAQs,'' try consulting the ``Applicant User Guide'' or
contacting Grants.gov via email at support@grants.gov or telephone at
1-800-518-4726. The Grants.gov Contact Center is open 24 hours a day,
seven days a week.
Entities wishing to apply for assistance may download the
application documents and requirements delineated in this Notice from
the RCDI Web site: https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rhs/rcdi. Application
information for electronic submissions may be found at https://www.grants.gov.
Applicants may also request paper application packages from the
Rural Development office in their state.
Applicants have the option of submitting their application on a CD
or a completed paper application. Proposals submitted via CD or paper
must be received at or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on May 9, 2012 at the
following address: Attn: Terry D'Addio, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
14th and Independence Avenue SW., Room 6015-S, Washington, DC 20250.
Proposals shall be submitted in sealed envelopes or packages with a
cover page labeled with ``Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 Rural Jobs
Accelerator,'' the project name; and the organizations included in the
application. One original and two copies of the CD or paper submission
must be delivered via postal mail or courier service with a postmark or
courier service's time and date stamp on or before the deadline. USDA
mail security measures may delay receipt of United States Postal
Service mail for up to three weeks. Therefore, applicants that submit
via paper or CD are strongly advised to use carriers with guaranteed
delivery services and that provide confirmation that indicates the
application was delivered by the deadline.
CDs must be labeled with the project name and verified as virus
free. The Funding Agencies will not review any proposals submitted on
CDs on which viruses are detected.
The CD or paper submission must include all the required forms,
Project Description documents and addenda for all applicants proposing
scopes of work for the joint project (see section V.C. of this FFO for
application content requirements).
The applicant may download the appropriate application package in a
screen-fillable format from https://www.grants.gov/applicants/apply_for_grants.jsp, save it electronically, and upload it onto the CD.
If your application is received after the deadline, it will not be
reviewed.
Selection of an organization under this FFO does not constitute
approval of the proposed project as submitted. Before any funds are
awarded, the Funding Agencies may enter into negotiations about such
items as program components, staffing and funding levels, and
administrative systems in place to support implementation of the award.
The amount of available funding may require the final award amount to
be less than that requested by the applicant. If the negotiations do
not result in a mutually acceptable submission, the Grants Officer for
the applicable Funding Agency reserves the right to terminate the
negotiations and decline to fund the application. The Funding Agencies
reserve the right not to fund any application received under this
competitive solicitation.
Unsuccessful Competition
On occasion, competitive solicitations or competitive panels
produce less than optimum results, such as a competition resulting in
the receipt of no
[[Page 16533]]
applications, a competition resulting in the receipt of only
unresponsive or unqualified applications, or too few highly rated
applications. In the event that these conditions arise, the Funding
Agencies shall take the most time- and cost-effective approach
available that is in the best interest of the Federal government. This
includes (1) Re-competition, (2) re-paneling, or (3) formal
negotiation.
Part VIII--Award Administration Information
A. General Information
Within the limit of funds available for such purpose, the awarding
official of the Agency shall make grants in ranked order to eligible
applicants under the procedures set forth in this Notice.
B. Award Notice
Applicants will be notified of selection by letter. Unsuccessful
applicants will receive notification including appeal rights by mail.
In addition, selected applicants will be requested to verify that
components of the application have not changed at the time of selection
and on the award obligation date, if requested by the Agency. The award
is not approved until all information has been verified, and the
awarding official of the Agency has signed Form RD 1940-1, ``Request
for Obligation of Funds.''
C. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Grantees will be required to do the following:
1. Execute a Rural Community Development Initiative Grant
Agreement.
2. Execute Form RD 1940-1.
3. Use Form SF 270, ``Request for Advance or Reimbursement,'' to
request reimbursements. Provide receipts for expenditures, timesheets
and any other documentation to support the request for reimbursement.
4. Provide financial status and project performance reports on a
quarterly basis starting with the first full quarter after the grant
award.
5. Maintain a financial management system that is acceptable to the
Agency.
6. Ensure that records are maintained to document all activities
and expenditures utilizing RCDI grant funds and matching funds.
Receipts for expenditures will be included in this documentation.
7. Provide annual audits or management reports on Form RD 442-2,
``Statement of Budget, Income and Equity,'' and Form RD 442-3,
``Balance Sheet,'' depending on the amount of Federal funds expended
and the outstanding balance.
8. Collect and maintain data provided by recipients on race, sex,
and national origin and ensure recipients collect and maintain the same
data on beneficiaries. Race and ethnicity data will be collected in
accordance with OMB Federal Register notice, ``Revisions to the
Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and
Ethnicity,'' (62 FR 58782), October 30, 1997. Sex data will be
collected in accordance with Title IX of the Education Amendments of
1972. These items should not be submitted with the application but
should be available upon request by the Agency.
9. Provide a final project performance report.
10. Identify and report any association or relationship with Rural
Development employees.
11. The intermediary and recipient must comply with Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968,
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975,
Executive Order 12898, Executive Order 12250 and RD Instruction 7 CFR
part 1901-E.
12. The grantee must comply with policies, guidance, and
requirements as described in the following applicable OMB Circulars and
Code of Federal Regulations:
a. OMB Circular A-87 (Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Government);
b. OMB Circular A-122 (Cost Principles for Non-profit
Organizations);
c. OMB Circular A-133 (Audits of States, Local Governments, and
Non-Profit Organizations);
d. 7 CFR part 3015 (Uniform Federal Assistance Regulations);
e. 7 CFR part 3016 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments);
f. 2 CFR parts 417 and 180 (Government-wide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement);
g. 7 CFR part 3019 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and
Other Non-profit Organizations); and
h. 7 CFR part 3052 (Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-
Profit Organizations).
Additional Requirements
No Obligation for Future Funding
If an applicant is awarded funding under this Notice, USDA is not
under any obligation to provide any additional future funding in
connection with that award or to make future award(s). Amendment or
renewal of an award to increase funding or to extend the period of
performance is at the discretion of USDA.
Freedom of Information Act Disclosure
The Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) (FOIA) and the USDA's
implementing regulations at 7 CFR part 1, subpart A set forth the rules
and procedures to make requested material, information and records
publicly available. Unless prohibited by law and to the extent
permitted under FOIA, contents of applications submitted by applicants
may be released in response to FOIA requests.
Past Performance and Non-Compliance With Award Provisions
Unsatisfactory performance under prior Federal awards may result in
an application not being considered for funding. Failure to comply with
any or all of the provisions of an award may have a negative impact on
future funding by the USDA and may be considered grounds for any or all
of the following actions: (1) Establishing an account receivable; (2)
withholding payments to the recipient under any USDA award(s); (3)
changing the method of payment from advance to reimbursement only; (4)
imposing other special award conditions; (5) suspending any active USDA
award(s); and (6) terminating any active USDA award(s).
Part IX--Agency Contact
Contact the Rural Development office in the state where the
applicant's headquarters is located. A list of Rural Development State
Offices is included in this Notice.
Part X--Nondiscrimination Statement
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination
in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color,
national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital
status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation,
genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance
program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with
disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to
[[Page 16534]]
USDA, Director, Office of Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-
6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and
lender.
Part XI--Appeal Process
All adverse determinations regarding applicant eligibility and the
awarding of points as part of the selection process are appealable
pursuant to 7 CFR part 11. Instructions on the appeal process will be
provided at the time an applicant is notified of the adverse decision.
Grant Amount Determination
In the event the applicant is awarded a grant that is less than the
amount requested, the applicant will be required to modify its
application to conform to the reduced amount before execution of the
grant agreement. The Agency reserves the right to reduce or withdraw
the award if acceptable modifications are not submitted by the awardee
within 15 working days from the date the request for modification is
made. Any modifications must be within the scope of the original
application.
Rural Development State Office Contacts
Note: Telephone numbers listed are not toll-free.
Alabama State Office
Suite 601, Sterling Centre, 4121 Carmichael Road, Montgomery, AL
36106-3683, (334) 279-3400, TDD (334) 279-3495, Allen Bowen.
Alaska State Office
800 West Evergreen, Suite 201, Palmer, AK 99645, (907) 761-7778,
TDD (907) 761-8905, Merlaine Kruse.
Arizona State Office
230 North 1st Avenue, Suite 206, Phoenix, AZ 85003, (602) 280-
8747, TDD (602) 280-8705, Leonard Gradillas.
Arkansas State Office
700 W. Capitol Ave., Rm. 3416, Little Rock, AR 72201-3225, (501)
301-3265, TDD (501) 301-3200, Stephen Lagasse.
California State Office
430 G Street, Agency 4169, Davis, CA 95616-4169, (530) 792-5810,
TDD (530) 792-5848, Janice Waddell.
Colorado State Office
Denver Federal Center, Building 56, Room 2300, P.O. Box 25426*,
Denver, CO 80225-0426, (720) 544-2927, TDD (720) 544-2976, Jerry
Tamlin.
Connecticut
Served by Massachusetts State Office.
Delaware and Maryland State Office
1221 College Park Dr., Suite 200, Dover, DE 19904-8713, (302)
857-3627, TDD (302) 857-3585, Denise MacLeish.
Florida & Virgin Islands State Office
4440 NW. 25th Place, P.O. Box 147010, Gainesville, FL 32614-
7010, (352) 338-3485, TDD (352) 338-3499, Michael Langston.
Georgia State Office
Stephens Federal Building, 355 E. Hancock Avenue, Athens, GA
30601-2768, (706) 546-2171, TDD (706) 546-2034, Jerry M. Thomas.
Guam
Served by Hawaii State Office.
Hawaii, Guam, & Western Pacific Territories State Office
Room 311, Federal Building, 154 Waianuenue Avenue, Hilo, HI
96720, (808) 933-8317, TDD (808) 933-8321, Alton Kimura.
Idaho State Office
9173 West Barnes Dr., Suite A1, Boise, ID 83709, (208) 378-5617,
TDD (208) 378-5600, David A. Flesher.
Illinois State Office
2118 West Park Court, Suite A, Champaign, IL 61821, (217) 403-
6209, TDD (217) 403-6240, Michael Wallace.
Indiana State Office
5975 Lakeside Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46278-1996, (317) 290-
3100 (ext. 407), TDD (317) 290-3343, Rochelle Owen.
Iowa State Office
873 Federal Building, 210 Walnut Street, Des Moines, IA 50309,
(515) 284-4459, TDD (515) 284-4858, Karla Peiffer.
Kansas State Office
1303 SW. First American Place, Suite 100, Topeka, KS 66604-4040,
(785) 271-2728, TDD (785) 271-2767, Kent Evans.
Kentucky State Office
771 Corporate Drive, Suite 200, Lexington, KY 40503, (859) 224-
7415, TDD (859) 224-7300, Vernon Brown.
Louisiana State Office
3727 Government Street, Alexandria, LA 71302, (318) 473-7965,
TDD (318) 473-7920, Richard Hoffpauir.
Maine State Office
967 Illinois Ave., Suite 4, P.O. Box 405, Bangor, ME 04402-0405,
(207) 990-9124, TDD (207) 942-7331, Ron Lambert.
Maryland
Served by Delaware State Office.
Massachusetts, Connecticut, & Rhode Island State Office
451 West Street, Suite 2, Amherst, MA 01002-2999, (413) 253-
4300, TDD (413) 253-7068, Daniel R. Beaudette.
Michigan State Office
3001 Coolidge Road, Suite 200, East Lansing, MI 48823, (517)
324-5208, TDD (517) 337-6795, Christine M. Maxwell.
Minnesota State Office
410 Farm Credit Service Building, 375 Jackson Street, St. Paul,
MN 55101-1853, (651) 602-7800, TDD (651) 602-3799, Terry Louwagie.
Mississippi State Office
Federal Building, Suite 831, 100 W. Capitol Street, Jackson, MS
39269, (601) 965-4326, TDD (601) 965-5850, Darnella Smith-Murray.
Missouri State Office
601 Business Loop 70 West, Parkade Center, Suite 235, Columbia,
MO 65203, (573) 876-0976, TDD (573) 876-9480, Clark Thomas.
Montana State Office
2229 Boot Hill Court, Bozeman, MT 59715, (406) 585-2520, TDD
(406) 585-2545, Steve Troendle.
Nebraska State Office
Federal Building, Room 152, 100 Centennial Mall N., Lincoln, NE
68508, (402) 437-5559, TDD (402) 437-5551, Denise Brosius-Meeks.
Nevada State Office
1390 South Curry Street, Carson City, NV 89703-9910, (775) 887-
1222 (ext. 113), TDD 7-1-1, Cheryl Couch.
New Hampshire
Served by Vermont State Office.
New Jersey State Office
8000 Midlantic Drive, 5th Floor North, Suite 500, Mt. Laurel, NJ
08054, (856) 787-7753, Kenneth Drewes.
New Mexico State Office
6200 Jefferson St. NE., Room 255, Albuquerque, NM 87109, (505)
761-4954, TDD (505) 761-4938, Martha Torrez.
New York State Office
The Galleries of Syracuse, 441 S. Salina Street, Suite 357,
Syracuse, NY 13202-2541, (315) 477-6400, TDD (315) 477-6447, Gail
Giannotta.
North Carolina State Office
4405 Bland Road, Suite 260, Raleigh, NC 27609, (919) 873-2063,
TDD (919) 873-2003, William A. Hobbs.
North Dakota State Office
Federal Building, Room 208, 220 East Rosser Ave., P.O. Box 1737,
Bismarck, ND 58502-1737, (701) 530-2029, TDD (701) 530-2113, Mark
Wax.
Ohio State Office
Federal Building, Room 507, 200 North High Street, Columbus, OH
43215-2418, (614) 255-2391, TDD (614) 255-2554, David M. Douglas.
Oklahoma State Office
100 USDA, Suite 108, Stillwater, OK 74074-2654, (405) 742-1061,
TDD (405) 742-1007, Jerry Efurd.
Oregon State Office
1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 801, Portland, OR 97232, (503) 414-
3362, TDD (503) 414-3387, Sam Goldstein.
Pennsylvania State Office
One Credit Union Place, Suite 330, Harrisburg, PA 17110-2996,
(717) 237-2281, TDD (717) 237-2281, Susanne Gantz.
Puerto Rico State Office
654 Mu[ntilde]oz Rivera Avenue, Suite 601, San Juan, PR 00918-
6106, (787) 766-5095, TDD (787) 766-5332, Nereida Rodriguez.
Rhode Island
Served by Massachusetts State Office.
South Carolina State Office
Strom Thurmond Federal Building, 1835 Assembly Street, Room
1007, Columbia, SC 29201, (803) 253-3425, TDD (803) 765-5697, Jesse
T. Risher.
South Dakota State Office
Federal Building, Room 210, 200 Fourth Street SW., Huron, SD
57350, (605) 352-1145, TDD (605) 352-1147, Doug Roehl.
Tennessee State Office
Suite 300, 3322 West End Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203-1071, (615)
783-1345, TDD (615) 783-1397, Keith Head.
[[Page 16535]]
Texas State Office
Federal Building, Suite 102, 101 South Main, Temple, TX 76501,
(254) 742-9787, TDD (254) 742-9749, Michael B. Canales.
Utah State Office
Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building, 125 South State Street,
Room 4311, P.O. Box 11350, Salt Lake City, UT 84138, (801) 524-4326,
TDD (801) 524-3309, Debra Meyer.
Vermont State Office
City Center, 3rd Floor, 89 Main Street, Montpelier, VT 05602,
(802) 828-6033, TDD (802) 223-6365, Rhonda Shippee.
Virgin Islands
Served by Florida State Office.
Virginia State Office
Culpeper Building, Suite 238, 1606 Santa Rosa Road, Richmond, VA
23229, (804) 287-1577, TDD (804) 287-1753, Kent Ware.
Washington State Office
1835 Black Lake Boulevard, SW., Suite B, Olympia, WA 98512-5715,
(360) 704-7737, Peter McMillin.
Western Pacific Territories
Served by Hawaii State Office.
West Virginia State Office
1550 Earl Core Road, Suite 101, Morgantown, WV 26505, (304) 284-
4886, TDD (304) 284-4836, Janna Lowery.
Wisconsin State Office
4949 Kirschling Court, Stevens Point, WI 54481, (715) 345-7615,
TDD (715) 345-7610, Brian Deaner.
Wyoming State Office
Federal Building, Room 1005, 100 East B Street, P.O. Box 11005,
Casper, WY 82602-5006, (307) 233-6700, TDD (307) 233-6719, Alana
Cannon.
Washington, DC
Stop 0787, Room 0175, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC 20250-0787, (202) 205-9685, Shirley J. Stevenson.
Dated: March 14, 2012.
Cristina Chiappe,
Acting Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-6611 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XV-P