Order Modifying Licenses With Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Effective Immediately), 16091-16098 [2012-6547]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices
16091
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2012–0068]
Order Modifying Licenses With Regard
to Requirements for Mitigation
Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis
External Events (Effective Immediately)
In the Matter of:
ALL POWER REACTOR LICENSEES AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS IN ACTIVE OR DEFERRED STATUS.
I
The Licensees and construction
permits (CP) holders 1 identified in
Attachment 1 to this Order hold licenses
and CPs issued by the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or
Commission) authorizing operation and/
or construction of nuclear power plants
in accordance with the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended, and Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR) Part 50, ‘‘Domestic Licensing of
Production and Utilization Facilities,’’
and Part 52, ‘‘Licenses, Certifications,
and Approvals for Nuclear Power
Plants.’’
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
II
On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0
earthquake struck off the coast of the
Japanese island of Honshu. The
earthquake resulted in a large tsunami,
estimated to have exceeded 14 meters
(45 feet) in height, that inundated the
Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant
site. The earthquake and tsunami
produced widespread devastation across
northeastern Japan and significantly
affected the infrastructure and industry
in the northeastern coastal areas of
Japan.
When the earthquake occurred,
Fukushima Dai-ichi Units 1, 2, and 3
were in operation and Units 4, 5, and 6
were shut down for routine refueling
and maintenance activities. The Unit 4
reactor fuel was offloaded to the Unit 4
spent fuel pool (SFP). Following the
earthquake, the three operating units
automatically shut down and offsite
power was lost to the entire facility. The
emergency diesel generators (EDGs)
started at all six units providing
alternating current (ac) electrical power
to critical systems at each unit. The
facility response to the earthquake
appears to have been normal.
1 CP holders, as used in this Order, includes CPs,
in active or deferred status, as identified in
Attachment 1 to this Order (i.e., Watts Bar, Unit 2;
and Bellefonte, Units 1 and 2)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Mar 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
Docket Nos. (as shown in Attachment 1) License Nos. (as shown in
Attachment 1) or Construction Permit Nos. (as shown in Attachment 1))
EA–12–049
Approximately 40 minutes following
the earthquake and shutdown of the
operating units, the first large tsunami
wave inundated the site, followed by
additional waves. The tsunami caused
extensive damage to site facilities and
resulted in a complete loss of all ac
electrical power at Units 1 through 5, a
condition known as station blackout. In
addition, all direct current electrical
power was lost early in the event on
Units 1 and 2 and after some period of
time at the other units. Unit 6 retained
the function of one air-cooled EDG.
Despite their actions, the operators lost
the ability to cool the fuel in the Unit
1 reactor after several hours, in the Unit
2 reactor after about 70 hours, and in the
Unit 3 reactor after about 36 hours,
resulting in damage to the nuclear fuel
shortly after the loss of cooling
capabilities.
Following the events at the
Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power
plant, the NRC established a senior-level
agency task force referred to as the NearTerm Task Force (NTTF). The NTTF
was tasked with conducting a
systematic and methodical review of the
NRC regulations and processes and
determining if the agency should make
additional improvements to these
programs in light of the events at
Fukushima Dai-ichi. As a result of this
review, the NTTF developed a
comprehensive set of recommendations,
documented in SECY–11–0093, ‘‘NearTerm Report and Recommendations for
Agency Actions Following the Events in
Japan,’’ dated July 12, 2011. These
recommendations were enhanced by the
NRC staff following interactions with
stakeholders. Documentation of the
staff’s efforts is contained in SECY–11–
0124, ‘‘Recommended Actions to be
Taken Without Delay From the NearTerm Task Force Report,’’ dated
September 9, 2011, and SECY–11–0137,
‘‘Prioritization of Recommended
Actions to be Taken in Response to
Fukushima Lessons Learned,’’ dated
October 3, 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
As directed by the Commission’s staff
requirements memorandum (SRM) for
SECY–11–0093, the NRC staff reviewed
the NTTF recommendations within the
context of the NRC’s existing regulatory
framework and considered the various
regulatory vehicles available to the NRC
to implement the recommendations.
SECY–11–0124 and SECY–11–0137
established the staff’s prioritization of
the recommendations based upon the
potential safety enhancements.
Since receiving the Commission’s
direction in SRM–SECY–11–0124 and
SRM–SECY–11–0137, the NRC staff
conducted public meetings to discuss
enhanced mitigation strategies intended
to maintain or restore core cooling,
containment, and SFP cooling
capabilities following beyond-designbasis external events. At these meetings,
the industry described its proposal for a
Diverse and Flexible Mitigation
Capability (FLEX), as documented in the
Nuclear Energy Institute’s (NEI’s) letter
dated December 16, 2011 (Agency
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Accession No.
ML11353A008). FLEX is proposed as a
strategy to fulfill the key safety
functions of core cooling, containment
integrity, and spent fuel cooling.
Stakeholder input influenced the staff to
pursue a more performance-based
approach to improve the safety of
operating power reactors than
envisioned in NTTF Recommendation
4.2, SECY–11–0124, and SECY–11–
0137.
Current regulatory requirements and
existing plant capabilities allow the
NRC to conclude that a sequence of
events such as the Fukushima Dai-ichi
accident is unlikely to occur in the U.S.
Therefore, continued operation and
continued licensing activities do not
pose an imminent threat to public
health and safety. However, NRC’s
assessment of new insights from the
events at Fukushima Dai-ichi leads the
staff to conclude that additional
requirements must be imposed on
Licensees or CP holders to increase the
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
16092
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
capability of nuclear power plants to
mitigate beyond-design-basis external
events. These additional requirements
are needed to provide adequate
protection to public health and safety,
as set forth in Section III of this Order.
Guidance and strategies required by
this Order would be available if the loss
of power, motive force, and normal
access to the ultimate heat sink to
prevent fuel damage in the reactor and
SFP, affected all units at a site
simultaneously. This Order requires a
three-phase approach for mitigating
beyond-design-basis external events.
The initial phase requires the use of
installed equipment and resources to
maintain or restore core cooling,
containment, and SFP cooling. The
transition phase requires providing
sufficient, portable, onsite equipment
and consumables to maintain or restore
these functions until they can be
accomplished with resources brought
from off site. The final phase requires
obtaining sufficient offsite resources to
sustain those functions indefinitely.
Additional details on an acceptable
approach for complying with this Order
will be contained in final Interim Staff
Guidance (ISG) scheduled to be issued
by the NRC in August 2012. This
guidance will also include a template to
be used for the plan that will be
submitted in accordance with Section
IV, Condition C.1 below.
III
Reasonable assurance of adequate
protection of the public health and
safety and assurance of the common
defense and security are the
fundamental NRC regulatory objectives.
Compliance with NRC requirements
plays a critical role in giving the NRC
confidence that Licensees or CP holders
are maintaining an adequate level of
public health and safety and common
defense and security. While compliance
with NRC requirements presumptively
assures adequate protection, new
information may reveal that additional
requirements are warranted. In such
situations, the Commission may act in
accordance with its statutory authority
under Section 161 of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended, to require
Licensees or CP holders to take action
in order to protect health and safety and
common defense and security.
To protect public health and safety
from the inadvertent release of
radioactive materials, the NRC’s
defense-in-depth strategy includes
multiple layers of protection: (1)
Prevention of accidents by virtue of the
design, construction, and operation of
the plant; (2) mitigation features to
prevent radioactive releases should an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Mar 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
accident occur; and (3) emergency
preparedness programs that include
measures such as sheltering and
evacuation. The defense-in-depth
strategy also provides for multiple
physical barriers to contain the
radioactive materials in the event of an
accident. The barriers are the fuel
cladding, the reactor coolant pressure
boundary, and the containment. These
defense-in-depth features are embodied
in the existing regulatory requirements
and thereby provide adequate protection
of the public health and safety.
Following the events of September 11,
2001, the NRC issued Order EA–02–026,
dated February 25, 2002, which
required Licensees to develop mitigating
strategies related to the key safety
functions of core cooling, containment,
and SFP cooling. NEI Document 06–12,
‘‘B.5.b Phase 2 & 3 Submittal Guideline’’
(ADAMS Accession No. ML070090060)
provides guidelines that describe the
necessary mitigating strategies. The NRC
endorsed these guidelines in a letter
dated December 22, 2006, designated as
Official Use Only. Those mitigating
strategies were developed in the context
of a localized event that was envisioned
to challenge portions of a single unit.
The events at Fukushima, however,
demonstrate that beyond-design-basis
external events may adversely affect: (1)
More than one unit at a site with two
or more units, and (2) multiple safety
functions at each of several units
located on the same site.
The events at Fukushima further
highlight the possibility that extreme
natural phenomena could challenge the
prevention, mitigation, and emergency
preparedness defense-in-depth layers.
To address the uncertainties associated
with beyond-design-basis external
events, the NRC is requiring additional
defense-in-depth measures at licensed
nuclear power reactors so that the NRC
can continue to have reasonable
assurance of adequate protection of
public health and safety in mitigating
the consequences of a beyond-designbasis external event.
The strategies and guidance
developed and implemented by
Licensees or CP holders in response to
the requirements imposed by this Order
will provide the necessary capabilities
to supplement those of the permanently
installed plant structures, systems, and
components that could become
unavailable following beyond-designbasis external events. These strategies
and guidance will enhance the safety
and preparedness capabilities
established following September 11,
2001, and codified as 10 CFR
50.54(hh)(2). In order to address the
potential for more widespread effects of
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
beyond design basis external events,
this Order requires strategies with
increased capacity to implement
protective actions concurrently at
multiple units at a site. The strategies
shall be developed to add multiple ways
to maintain or restore core cooling,
containment and SFP cooling
capabilities in order to improve the
defense-in-depth of licensed nuclear
power reactors.
The Commission has determined that
ensuring adequate protection of public
health and safety requires that power
reactor Licensees and CP holders
develop, implement and maintain
guidance and strategies to restore or
maintain core cooling, containment, and
SFP cooling capabilities in the event of
a beyond-design-basis external event.
These new requirements provide a
greater mitigation capability consistent
with the overall defense-in-depth
philosophy, and, therefore, greater
assurance that the challenges posed by
beyond-design-basis external events to
power reactors do not pose an undue
risk to public health and safety. In order
to provide reasonable assurance of
adequate protection of public health and
safety, all operating reactor licenses and
CPs under Part 50 identified in
Attachment 1 to this Order shall be
modified to include the requirements
identified in Attachment 2 to this Order.
All combined licenses (COLs) under 10
CFR part 52 identified in Attachment 1
to this Order shall be modified to
include the requirements identified in
Attachment 3 to this Order.
Accordingly, the NRC has concluded
that these measures are necessary to
ensure adequate protection of public
health and safety under the provisions
of the backfit rule, 10 CFR
50.109(a)(4)(ii), and is requiring
Licensee or CP holder action. In
addition, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202, the
NRC finds that the public health, safety
and interest require that this Order be
made immediately effective.
IV
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
161b, 161i, 161o, and 182 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and
the Commission’s regulations in 10 CFR
2.202, and 10 CFR Parts 50 and 52, it is
hereby ordered, effective immediately,
that all licenses and construction
permits identified in attachment 1 to
this order are modified as follows:
A. 1. All holders of CPs issued under
Part 50 shall, notwithstanding the
provisions of any Commission
regulation or CPs to the contrary,
comply with the requirements described
in Attachment 2 to this Order except to
the extent that a more stringent
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices
requirement is set forth in the CP. These
CP holders shall complete full
implementation prior to issuance of an
operating license.
2. All holders of operating licenses
issued under Part 50 shall,
notwithstanding the provisions of any
Commission regulation or license to the
contrary, comply with the requirements
described in Attachment 2 to this Order
except to the extent that a more
stringent requirement is set forth in the
license. These Licensees shall promptly
start implementation of the
requirements in Attachment 2 to the
Order and shall complete full
implementation no later than two (2)
refueling cycles after submittal of the
overall integrated plan, as required in
Condition C.1.a, or December 31, 2016,
whichever comes first.
3. All holders of COLs issued under
Part 52 shall, notwithstanding the
provisions of any Commission
regulation or license to the contrary,
comply with the requirements described
in Attachment 3 to this Order except to
the extent that a more stringent
requirement is set forth in the license.
These Licensees shall promptly start
implementation of the requirements in
Attachment 3 to the Order and shall
complete full implementation prior to
initial fuel load.
B.1. All Licensees and CP holders
shall, within twenty (20) days of the
date of this Order, notify the
Commission, (1) if they are unable to
comply with any of the requirements
described in Attachment 2 or
Attachment 3, (2) if compliance with
any of the requirements is unnecessary
in their specific circumstances, or (3) if
implementation of any of the
requirements would cause the Licensee
or CP holder to be in violation of the
provisions of any Commission
regulation or the facility license. The
notification shall provide the Licensee’s
or CP holder’s justification for seeking
relief from or variation of any specific
requirement.
2. Any Licensee or CP holder that
considers that implementation of any of
the requirements described in
Attachment 2 or Attachment 3 to this
Order would adversely impact safe and
secure operation of the facility must
notify the Commission, within twenty
(20) days of this Order, of the adverse
safety impact, the basis for its
determination that the requirement has
an adverse safety impact, and either a
proposal for achieving the same
objectives specified in Attachment 2 or
Attachment 3 requirement in question,
or a schedule for modifying the facility
to address the adverse safety condition.
If neither approach is appropriate, the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Mar 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
Licensee or CP holder must supplement
its response to Condition B.1 of this
Order to identify the condition as a
requirement with which it cannot
comply, with attendant justifications as
required in Condition B.1.
C.1. a. All holders of operating
licenses issued under Part 50 shall by
February 28, 2013, submit to the
Commission for review an overall
integrated plan including a description
of how compliance with the
requirements described in Attachment 2
will be achieved.
b. All holders of CPs issued under
Part 50 or COLs issued under Part 52
shall, within one (1) year after issuance
of the final ISG, submit to the
Commission for review an overall
integrated plan including a description
of how compliance with the
requirements described in Attachment 2
or Attachment 3 will be achieved.
2. All Licensees and holders of CPs
shall provide an initial status report
sixty (60) days following issuance of the
final ISG and at six (6)-month intervals
following submittal of the overall
integrated plan, as required in
Condition C.1, which delineates
progress made in implementing the
requirements of this Order.
3. All Licensees and CP holders shall
report to the Commission when full
compliance with the requirements
described in Attachment 2 or
Attachment 3 is achieved.
Licensee or CP holders responses to
Conditions B.1, B.2, C.1, C.2, and C.3,
above shall be submitted in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.4 and 10 CFR 52.3, as
applicable.
As applicable, the Director, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation or the
Director, Office of New Reactors may, in
writing, relax or rescind any of the
above conditions upon demonstration
by the Licensee or CP holder of good
cause.
V
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, the
Licensee or CP holder must, and any
other person adversely affected by this
Order may, submit an answer to this
Order, and may request a hearing on
this Order, within 20 days of the date of
this Order. Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending
the time to answer or to request a
hearing. A request for extension of time
in which to submit an answer or request
a hearing must be made in writing to the
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation or to the Director, Office of
New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555,
and include a statement of good cause
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16093
for the extension. The answer may
consent to this Order.
If a hearing is requested by a Licensee,
CP holder or a person whose interest is
adversely affected, the Commission will
issue an Order designating the time and
place of any hearings. If a hearing is
held, the issue to be considered at such
hearing shall be whether this Order
should be sustained. Pursuant to 10 CFR
2.202(c)(2)(i), the licensee, CP holder or
any other person adversely affected by
this Order, may, in addition to
demanding a hearing, at the time the
answer is filed or sooner, move the
presiding officer to set aside the
immediate effectiveness of the Order on
the ground that the Order, including the
need for immediate effectiveness, is not
based on adequate evidence but on mere
suspicion, unfounded allegations, or
error.
All documents filed in NRC
adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave
to intervene, any motion or other
document filed in the proceeding prior
to the submission of a request for
hearing or petition to intervene, and
documents filed by interested
governmental entities participating
under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in
accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule
(72 FR 49139, August 28, 2007). The EFiling process requires participants to
submit and serve all adjudicatory
documents over the internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic
storage media. Participants may not
submit paper copies of their filings
unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures
described below.
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the
participant should contact the Office of
the Secretary by email at
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone
at (301) 415–1677, to request (1) a
digital ID certificate, which allows the
participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any proceeding in which it is
participating; and (2) advise the
Secretary that the participant will be
submitting a request or petition for
hearing (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or
representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon
this information, the Secretary will
establish an electronic docket for the
hearing in this proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an
electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
16094
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices
NRC’s public Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/
apply-certificates.html. System
requirements for accessing the ESubmittal server are detailed in NRC’s
‘‘Guidance for Electronic Submission,’’
which is available on the agency’s
public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants
may attempt to use other software not
listed on the web site, but should note
that the NRC’s E-Filing system does not
support unlisted software, and the NRC
Meta System Help Desk will not be able
to offer assistance in using unlisted
software.
If a participant is electronically
submitting a document to the NRC in
accordance with the E-Filing rule, the
participant must file the document
using the NRC’s online, web-based
submission form. In order to serve
documents through the Electronic
Information Exchange, users will be
required to install a web browser plugin from the NRC web site. Further
information on the web-based
submission form, including the
installation of the Web browser plug-in,
is available on the NRC’s public Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a
digital ID certificate and a docket has
been created, the participant can then
submit a request for hearing or petition
for leave to intervene. Submissions
should be in Portable Document Format
(PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered
complete at the time the documents are
submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing
system. To be timely, an electronic
filing must be submitted to the E-Filing
system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system
time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email
notice that provides access to the
document to the NRC Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the documents on those
participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before a hearing request/
petition to intervene is filed so that they
can obtain access to the document via
the E-Filing system.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Mar 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
A person filing electronically using
the agency’s adjudicatory E-Filing
system may seek assistance by
contacting the NRC Meta System Help
Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link
located on the NRC Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at (866) 672–7640. The NRC
Meta System Help Desk is available
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing requesting authorization to
continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted
by: (1) First class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery
service to the Office of the Secretary,
Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this
manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants.
Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in
the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon
depositing the document with the
provider of the service. A presiding
officer, having granted an exemption
request from using E-Filing, may require
a participant or party to use E-Filing if
the presiding officer subsequently
determines that the reason for granting
the exemption from use of E-Filing no
longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in NRC’s
electronic hearing docket, which is
available to the public at https://
ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the Commission,
or the presiding officer. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
home phone numbers in their filings,
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited
excerpts that serve the purpose of the
adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application,
participants are requested not to include
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
copyrighted materials in their
submission.
If a person other than the Licensee or
CP holder requests a hearing, that
person shall set forth with particularity
the manner in which his interest is
adversely affected by this Order and
shall address the criteria set forth in 10
CFR 2.309(d).
In the absence of any request for
hearing, or written approval of an
extension of time in which to request a
hearing, the provisions specified in
Section IV above shall be final twenty
(20) days from the date of this Order
without further order or proceedings. If
an extension of time for requesting a
hearing has been approved, the
provisions specified in Section IV shall
be final when the extension expires if a
hearing request has not been received.
An answer or a request for hearing shall
not stay the immediate effectiveness of
this order.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated this 12th day of March 2012.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
Michael R. Johnson,
Director, Office of New Reactors.
Power Reactor Licensees and Holders
of Construction Permits in Active or
Deferred Status
Arkansas Nuclear One
Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket Nos.
50–313 and 50–368, License Nos.
DPR–51 and NPF–6
Mr. Christopher J. Schwarz, Vice
President, Operations, Entergy
Operations, Inc., Arkansas Nuclear
One, 1448 S.R. 333, Russellville, AR
72802
Beaver Valley Power Station
First Energy Nuclear Operating Co.,
Docket Nos. 50–334 and 50–412,
License Nos. DPR–66 and NPF–73
Mr. Paul A. Harden, Site Vice President,
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company, Mail Stop A–BV–SEB1,
P.O. Box 4, Route 168, Shippingport,
PA 15077
Bellefonte Nuclear Power Station
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket
Nos. 50–438 and 50–439,
Construction Permit Nos. CPPR No.
122 and CPPR No. 123
Mr. Michael D. Skaggs, Senior Vice
President, Nuclear Generation
Development and Construction,
Tennessee Valley Authority, 6A
Lookout Place, 1101 Market Street,
Chattanooga, TN 37402–2801
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices
Braidwood Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket
Nos. STN 50–456 and STN 50–457,
License Nos. NPF–72 and NPF–77
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear,
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
60555
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket
Nos. 50–259, 50–260 and 50–296,
License Nos. DPR–33, DPR–52 and
DPR–68
Mr. Preston D. Swafford, Chief Nuclear
Officer and Executive Vice President,
Tennessee Valley Authority, 3R
Lookout Place, 1101 Market Street,
Chattanooga, TN 37402–2801
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
Carolina Power & Light Co., Docket Nos.
50–325 and 50–324, License Nos.
DPR–71 and DPR–62
Mr. Michael J. Annacone, Vice
President, Carolina Power & Light
Company, Brunswick Steam Electric
Plant, P.O. Box 10429, Southport, NC
28461
Byron Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket
Nos. STN 50–454 and STN 50–455,
License Nos. NPF–37 and NPF–66
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear,
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
60555
Callaway Plant
Union Electric Co., Docket No. 50–483,
License No. NPF–30
Mr. Adam C. Heflin, Senior Vice
President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
Union Electric Company, P.O. Box
620, Fulton, MO 65251
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC,
Docket Nos. 50–317 and 50–318,
License Nos. DPR–53 and DPR–69
Mr. George H. Gellrich, Vice President,
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant,
LLC, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power
Plant, 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway,
Lusby, MD 20657–4702
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Catawba Nuclear Station
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket
Nos. 50–413 and 50–414, License Nos.
NPF–35 and NPF–52
Mr. James R. Morris, Site Vice President,
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Catawba
Nuclear Station, 4800 Concord Road,
York, SC 29745
Clinton Power Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket No.
50–461, License No. NPF–62
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Mar 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear,
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
60555
Columbia Generating Station
16095
Indiana Michigan Power Company,
Nuclear Generation Group, One Cook
Place, Bridgman, MI 49106
Dresden Nuclear Power Station
Energy Northwest, Docket No. 50–397,
License No. NPF–21
Mr. Mark E. Reddemann, Chief
Executive Officer, Energy Northwest,
MD 1023, P.O. Box 968, Richland,
WA 99352
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket
Nos. 50–237 and 50–249, License Nos.
DPR–19 and DPR–25
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear,
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
60555
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant
Duane Arnold Energy Center
Luminant Generation Co., LLC, Docket
Nos. 50–445 and 50–446, License Nos.
NPF–87 and NPF–89
Mr. Rafael Flores, Senior Vice President
and Chief Nuclear Officer, Luminant
Generation Company, LLC, Attn:
Regulatory Affairs, P.O. Box 1002,
Glen Rose, TX 76043
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC,
Docket No. 50–331, License No. DPR–
49
Mr. Peter Wells, Site Vice President,
NextEra Energy, Duane Arnold Energy
Center, 3277 DAEC Road, Palo, IA
52324–9785
Cooper Nuclear Station
Nebraska Public Power District, Docket
No. 50–298, License No. DPR–46
Mr. Brian J. O’Grady, Vice President—
Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer,
Nebraska Public Power District, 72676
648A Avenue, P.O. Box 98,
Brownville, NE 68321
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Docket
Nos. 50–321 and 50–366, License Nos.
DPR–57 and NPF–5
Mr. Dennis R. Madison, Vice President,
Southern Nuclear Operating
Company, Inc., Edwin I. Hatch
Nuclear Plant, 11028 Hatch Parkway
North, Baxley, GA 31513
Crystal River Nuclear Generating Plant
Fermi
Florida Power Corp., Docket No. 50–
302, License No. DPR–72
Mr. Jon A. Franke, Vice President, Attn:
Supervisor, Licensing & Regulatory
Affairs, Progress Energy, Inc., Crystal
River Nuclear Plant (NA2C), 15760
West Power Line Street, Crystal River,
FL 34428–6708
Detroit Edison Co., Docket No. 50–341,
License No. NPF–43
Mr. Jack M. Davis, Senior Vice President
and Chief Nuclear Officer, Detroit
Edison Company, Fermi 2—210 NOC,
6400 North Dixie Highway, Newport,
MI 48166
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
Omaha Public Power District, Docket
No. 50–285, License No. DPR–40
Mr. David J. Bannister, Vice President
and Chief Nuclear Officer, Omaha
Public Power District, 444 South 16th
St. Mall, Omaha, NE 68102–2247
First Energy Nuclear Operating Co.,
Docket No. 50–346, License No. NPF–
3
Mr. Barry S. Allen, Site Vice President,
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company, c/o Davis-Besse NPS, 5501
N. State Route 2, Oak Harbor, OH
43449–9760
Diablo Canyon Power Plant
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Docket Nos.
50–275 and 50–323, License Nos.
DPR–80 and DPR–82
Mr. John T. Conway, Senior Vice
President—Energy Supply and Chief
Nuclear Officer, Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, Diablo Canyon
Power Plant, 77 Beale Street, Mail
Code B32, San Francisco, CA 94105
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant
Indiana Michigan Power Co., Docket
Nos. 50–315 and 50–316, License Nos.
DPR–58 and DPR–74
Mr. Lawrence J. Weber, Senior Vice
President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant
Fort Calhoun Station
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50–
416, License No. NPF–29
Mr. Michael Perito, Vice President,
Operations, Entergy Operations, Inc.,
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1,
7003 Bald Hill Road, Port Gibson, MS
39150
H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant
Carolina Power & Light Co., Docket No.
50–261, License No. DPR–23
Mr. Robert J. Duncan II, Vice President,
Carolina Power & Light Company,
3581 West Entrance Road, Hartsville,
SC 29550
Hope Creek Generating Station
PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Docket No. 50–354,
License No. NPF–57
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
16096
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices
Mr. Thomas Joyce, President and Chief
Nuclear Officer, PSEG Nuclear LLC–
N09, P. O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge,
NJ 08038
Indian Point Energy Center
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,
Docket Nos. 50–247 and 50–286,
License Nos. DPR–26 and DPR–64
Mr. John Ventosa, Vice President,
Operations, Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc., Indian Point Energy
Center, 450 Broadway, GSB, P.O. Box
249, Buchanan, NY 10511–0249
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power
Plant
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,
Docket No. 50–333, License No. DPR–
59
Mike Colomb, Vice President,
Operations, Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc., James A. FitzPatrick
Nuclear Power Plant, P.O. Box 110,
Lycoming, NY 13093
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Docket
Nos. 50–348 and 50–364, License Nos.
NPF–2 and NPF–8
Mr. Tom Lynch, Vice President—Farley,
Southern Nuclear Operating
Company, Inc., Joseph M. Farley
Nuclear Plant, 7388 North State
Highway 95, Columbia, AL 36319
Kewaunee Power Station
Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.,
Docket No. 50–305, License No. DPR–
43
Mr. David A. Heacock, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Dominion
Energy Kewaunee, Inc., Innsbrook
Technical Center, 5000 Dominion
Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060–
6711
LaSalle County Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket
Nos. 50–373 and 50–374, License Nos.
NPF–11 and NPF–18
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear,
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
60555
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Limerick Generating Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket
Nos. 50–352 and 50–353, License Nos.
NPF–39 and NPF–85
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear,
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
60555
Millstone Nuclear Power Station
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.,
Docket Nos. 50–336 and 50–423,
License Nos. DPR–65 and NPF–49
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Mar 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
Mr. David A. Heacock, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Dominion
Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., Innsbrook
Technical Center, 5000 Dominion
Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060–
6711
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant
Northern States Power Company,
Docket No. 50–263, License No. DPR–
22
Mr. Timothy J. O’Connor, Site Vice
President, Northern States Power
Company—Minnesota, Monticello
Nuclear Generating Plant, 2807 West
County Road 75, Monticello, MN
55362–9637
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC,
Docket Nos. 50–220 and 50–410,
License Nos. DPR–63 and NPF–69
Mr. Ken Langdon, Vice President Nine
Mile Point, Nine Mile Point Nuclear
Station, LLC, P. O. Box 63, Lycoming,
NY 13093
North Anna Power Station
Virginia Electric & Power Co., Docket
Nos. 50–338 and 50–339, License Nos.
NPF–4 and NPF–7
Mr. David A. Heacock, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Dominion
Nuclear, Innsbrook Technical Center,
5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen
Allen, VA 23060–6711
Oconee Nuclear Station
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket
Nos. 50–269, 50–270 and 50–287,
License Nos. DPR–38, DPR–47 and
DPR–55
Mr. Preston Gillespie, Site Vice
President, Oconee Nuclear Station,
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, 7800
Rochester Highway, Seneca, SC 29672
Mr. Randall K. Edington, Executive Vice
President Nuclear and Chief Nuclear
Officer, Arizona Public Service Co.,
P. O. Box 52034, MS 7602, Phoenix,
AZ 85072–2034
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket
Nos. 50–277 and 50–278, License Nos.
DPR–44 and DPR–56
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear,
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
60555
Perry Nuclear Power Plant
First Energy Nuclear Operating Co.,
Docket No. 50–440, License No. NPF–
58
Mr. Vito A. Kaminskas, Site Vice
President—Nuclear—Perry,
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company, Perry Nuclear Power Plant,
10 Center Road, A290, Perry, OH
44081
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Unit No.
1
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,
Docket No. 50–293, License No. DPR–
35
Mr. Robert Smith, Vice President and
Site Vice President, Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc., Pilgrim Nuclear
Power Station, 600 Rocky Hill Road,
Plymouth, MA 02360–5508
Point Beach Nuclear Plant
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC,
Docket Nos. 50–266 and 50–301,
License Nos. DPR–24 and DPR–27
Mr. Larry Meyer, Site Vice President,
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC,
Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 &
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
2, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI
54241–9516
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket No.
50–219, License No. DPR–16
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear, Northern States Power Co. Minnesota,
Docket Nos. 50–282 and 50–306,
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
License Nos. DPR–42 and DPR–60
60555
Mr. Mark A. Schimmel, Site Vice
Palisades Nuclear Plant
President, Northern States Power
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,
Company—Minnesota, Prairie Island
Docket No. 50–255, License No. DPR–
Nuclear Generating Plant, 1717
20
Wakonade Drive East, Welch, MN
Mr. Anthony J. Vitale, Site Vice
55089–9642
President—Palisades, Entergy Nuclear
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station
Operations, Inc., Palisades Nuclear
Plant, 27780 Blue Star Memorial
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket
Highway, Covert, MI 49043
Nos. 50–254 and 50–265, License Nos.
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station
DPR–29 and DPR–30
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Arizona Public Service Company,
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear,
Docket Nos. STN 50–528, STN 50–529
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
and STN 50–530, License Nos. NPF–
60555
41, NPF–51 and NPF–74
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC,
Docket No. 50–244, License No. DPR–
18
Mr. Joseph E. Pacher, Vice President,
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC,
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, 1503
Lake Road, Ontario, NY 14519
River Bend Station
Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50–
458, License No. NPF–47
Mr. Eric W. Olson, Vice President,
Operations, Entergy Operations, Inc.,
River Bend Station, 5485 U.S.
Highway 61N, St. Francisville, LA
70775
Mr. Edward D. Halpin, President, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Nuclear
Officer, STP Nuclear Operating
Company, South Texas Project, P.O.
Box 289, Wadsworth, TX 77483
St. Lucie Plant
Florida Power & Light Co., Docket Nos.
50–335 and 50–389, License Nos.
DPR–67 and NPF–16
Mr. Mano Nazar, Executive Vice
President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
NextEra Energy, 700 Universe
Boulevard, P.O. Box 14000, Juno
Beach, FL 33408–0420
Surry Power Station
16097
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.,
Docket No. 50–395, License No. NPF–
12
Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin, Vice President
Nuclear Operations, South Carolina
Electric & Gas Company, Virgil C.
Summer Nuclear Station, Post Office
Box 88, Mail Code 300, Jenkinsville,
SC 29065
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Docket
Nos. 50–424 and 50–425, License Nos.
NPF–68 and NPF–81
Mr. Tom E. Tynan, Vice President,
Southern Nuclear Operating
Company, Inc., Vogtle Electric
Generating Plant, 7821 River Road,
Waynesboro, GA 30830
Salem Nuclear Generating Station
PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Docket Nos. 50–272
and 50–311, License Nos. DPR–70 and
DPR–75
Mr. Thomas Joyce, President and Chief
Nuclear Officer, PSEG Nuclear LLC—
N09, P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge,
NJ 08038
Virginia Electric & Power Co., Docket
Nos. 50–280 and 50–281, License Nos.
DPR–32 and DPR–371
Mr. David A. Heacock, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Dominion
Nuclear, Innsbrook Technical Center,
5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen
Allen, VA 23060–6711
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
Southern California Edison Co., Docket
Nos. 50–361 and 50–362, License Nos.
NPF–10 and NPF–15
Mr. Peter T. Dietrich, Senior Vice
President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
Southern California Edison Company,
San Onofre Nuclear Generating
Station, P.O. Box 128, San Clemente,
CA 92674–0128
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station
PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Docket Nos.
50–387 and 50–388, License Nos.
NPF–14 and NPF–22
Mr. Timothy S. Rausch, Senior Vice
President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
PPL Susquehanna, LLC, 769 Salem
Boulevard, NUCSB3, Berwick, PA
18603–0467
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Docket
Nos. 52–025 and 52–026, License Nos.
NPF–91 and NPF–92
Mr. B. L. Ivey, Vice President,
Regulatory Affairs, Southern Nuclear
Operating Company, Inc., 40
Inverness Center Parkway, Bin B022,
Birmingham, AL 35242
Waterford Steam Electric Station
Seabrook
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Docket
No. 50–443, License No. NPF–86
Mr. Paul Freeman, Site Vice President,
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, c/o
Mr. Michael O’Keefe, NextEra Energy
Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300,
Seabrook, NH 03874
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit
1
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket
Nos. 50–327 and 50–328, License Nos.
DPR–77 and DPR–79
Mr. Preston D. Swafford, Chief Nuclear
Officer and Executive Vice President,
Tennessee Valley Authority, 3R
Lookout Place, 1101 Market Street,
Chattanooga, TN 37402–2801
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
Carolina Power & Light Co., Docket No.
50–400, License No. NPF–63
Mr. Christopher L. Burton, Vice
President, Progress Energy Carolinas,
Inc., Shearon Harris Nuclear Power
Plant, P.O. Box 165, Mail Zone 1, New
Hill, NC 27562–0165
South Texas Project
STP Nuclear Operating Co., Docket Nos.
50–498 and 50–499, License Nos.
NPF–76 and NPF–80
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Mar 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
(* via corrected letter dated 3/13/12—
ML12073A366) Exelon Generation
Co., LLC, Docket No. 50–289, License
No. DPR–50
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and
Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear,
4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL
60555
Turkey Point
Florida Power & Light Co., Docket Nos.
50–250 and 50–251, License Nos.
DPR–31 and DPR–41
Mr. Mano Nazar, Executive Vice
President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
NextEra Energy, 700 Universe
Boulevard, P.O. Box 14000, Juno
Beach, FL 33408–0420
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,
Docket No. 50–271, License No. DPR–
28
Mr. Christopher J. Wamser, Site Vice
President, Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee
Nuclear Power Station, 320 Governor
Hunt Road, Vernon, VT 05354
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3
&4
Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50–
382, License No. NPF–38
Ms. Donna Jacobs, Vice President,
Operations, Entergy Operations, Inc.,
Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit
3, 17265 River Road, Killona, LA
70057–0751
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket No.
50–390, License No. NPF–90
Mr. Preston D. Swafford, Chief Nuclear
Officer and Executive Vice President,
Tennessee Valley Authority, 3R
Lookout Place, 1101 Market Street,
Chattanooga, TN 37402–2801
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket No.
50–391, Construction Permit No.
CPPR No. 092
Mr. Michael D. Skaggs, Senior Vice
President, Nuclear Generation
Development and Construction,
Tennessee Valley Authority, 6A
Lookout Place, 1101 Market Street,
Chattanooga, TN 37402–2801
William B. McGuire Nuclear Station
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket
Nos. 50–369 and 50–370, License Nos.
NPF–9 and NPF–17
Mr. Regis T. Repko, Vice President,
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, McGuire
Nuclear Site, 12700 Hagers Ferry
Road, Huntersville, NC 28078
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
16098
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 53 / Monday, March 19, 2012 / Notices
Wolf Creek Generating Station
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.,
Docket No. 50–482, License No. NPF–
42
Mr. Matthew W. Sunseri, President and
Chief Executive Officer, Wolf Creek
Nuclear Operating Corporation, P.O.
Box 411, Burlington, KS 66839
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Requirements for Mitigation Strategies
for Beyond-Design-Basis External
Events at Operating Reactor Sites and
Construction Permit Holders
This Order requires a three-phase
approach for mitigating beyond-designbasis external events. The initial phase
requires the use of installed equipment
and resources to maintain or restore
core cooling, containment and spent
fuel pool (SFP) cooling capabilities. The
transition phase requires providing
sufficient, portable, onsite equipment
and consumables to maintain or restore
these functions until they can be
accomplished with resources brought
from off site. The final phase requires
obtaining sufficient offsite resources to
sustain those functions indefinitely.
(1) Licensees or construction permit
(CP) holders shall develop, implement,
and maintain guidance and strategies to
maintain or restore core cooling,
containment and SFP cooling
capabilities following a beyond-designbasis external event.
(2) These strategies must be capable of
mitigating a simultaneous loss of all
alternating current (ac) power and loss
of normal access to the ultimate heat
sink and have adequate capacity to
address challenges to core cooling,
containment, and SFP cooling
capabilities at all units on a site subject
to this Order.
(3) Licensees or CP holders must
provide reasonable protection for the
associated equipment from external
events. Such protection must
demonstrate that there is adequate
capacity to address challenges to core
cooling, containment, and SFP cooling
capabilities at all units on a site subject
to this Order.
(4) Licensees or CP holders must be
capable of implementing the strategies
in all modes.
(5) Full compliance shall include
procedures, guidance, training, and
acquisition, staging, or installing of
equipment needed for the strategies.
Requirements for Mitigation Strategies
for Beyond-Design-Basis External
Events at Col Holder Reactor Sites
(VOGTLE Units 3 and 4)
Attachment 2 to this order for Part 50
licensees requires a phased approach for
mitigating beyond-design-basis external
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Mar 16, 2012
Jkt 226001
events. The initial phase requires the
use of installed equipment and
resources to maintain or restore core
cooling, containment and spent fuel
pool (SFP) cooling capabilities. The
transition phase requires providing
sufficient, portable, onsite equipment
and consumables to maintain or restore
these functions until they can be
accomplished with resources brought
from off site. The final phase requires
obtaining sufficient offsite resources to
sustain those functions indefinitely.
The design bases of Vogtle Units 3
and 4 includes passive design features
that provide core, containment and SFP
cooling capability for 72 hours, without
reliance on alternating current (ac)
power. These features do not rely on
access to any external water sources
since the containment vessel and the
passive containment cooling system
serve as the safety-related ultimate heat
sink. The NRC staff reviewed these
design features prior to issuance of the
combined licenses for these facilities
and certification of the AP1000 design
referenced therein. The AP1000 design
also includes equipment to maintain
required safety functions in the long
term (beyond 72 hours to 7 days)
including capability to replenish water
supplies. Connections are provided for
generators and pumping equipment that
can be brought to the site to back up the
installed equipment. The staff
concluded in its final safety evaluation
report for the AP1000 design that the
installed equipment (and alternatively,
the use of transportable equipment) is
capable of supporting extended
operation of the passive safety systems
to maintain required safety functions in
the long term. As such, this Order
requires Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to address
the following requirements relative to
the final phase.
(1) Licensees shall develop,
implement, and maintain guidance and
strategies to maintain or restore core
cooling, containment and SFP cooling
capabilities following a beyond-designbasis external event.
(2) These strategies must be capable of
mitigating a simultaneous loss of all ac
power and loss of normal access to the
normal heat sink and have adequate
capacity to address challenges to core
cooling, containment, and SFP cooling
capabilities at all units on a site subject
to this Order.
(3) Licensees must provide reasonable
protection for the associated equipment
from external events. Such protection
must demonstrate that there is adequate
capacity to address challenges to core
cooling, containment, and SFP cooling
capabilities at all units on a site subject
to this Order.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(4) Licensees must be capable of
implementing the strategies in all
modes.
(5) Full compliance shall include
procedures, guidance, training, and
acquisition, staging, or installing of
equipment needed for the strategies.
[FR Doc. 2012–6547 Filed 3–16–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. (as shown in Attachment 1);
License Nos. (as shown in Attachment 1);
EA–12–050; [NRC–2012–0069]
In the Matter of All Operating Boiling
Water Reactor Licensees With Mark I
and Mark II Containments; Order
Modifying Licenses With Regard To
Reliable Hardened Containment Vents
(Effective Immediately)
I
The Licensees identified in
Attachment 1 to this Order hold licenses
issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission)
authorizing operation of nuclear power
plants in accordance with the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 50, ‘‘Domestic
Licensing of Production and Utilization
Facilities.’’ Specifically, these Licensees
operate boiling-water reactors (BWRs)
with Mark I and Mark II containment
designs.
II
On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0
earthquake struck off the coast of the
Japanese island of Honshu. The
earthquake resulted in a large tsunami,
estimated to have exceeded 14 meters
(45 feet) in height, which inundated the
Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant
site. The earthquake and tsunami
produced widespread devastation across
northeastern Japan, and significantly
affected the infrastructure and industry
in the northeastern coastal areas of
Japan.
When the earthquake occurred,
Fukushima Dai-ichi Units 1, 2, and 3
were in operation and Units 4, 5, and 6
were shut down for routine refueling
and maintenance activities. The Unit 4
reactor fuel was offloaded to the Unit 4
spent fuel pool. Following the
earthquake, the three operating units
automatically shut down and offsite
power was lost to the entire facility. The
emergency diesel generators (EDGs)
started at all six units providing
alternating current (ac) electrical power
to critical systems at each unit. The
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 53 (Monday, March 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16091-16098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6547]
[[Page 16091]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2012-0068]
Order Modifying Licenses With Regard to Requirements for
Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events
(Effective Immediately)
In the Matter of:
ALL POWER REACTOR LICENSEES AND Docket Nos. (as shown in Attachment
HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION 1) License Nos. (as shown in
PERMITS IN ACTIVE OR DEFERRED Attachment 1) or Construction
STATUS. Permit Nos. (as shown in
Attachment 1))
EA-12-049
I
The Licensees and construction permits (CP) holders \1\ identified
in Attachment 1 to this Order hold licenses and CPs issued by the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) authorizing operation
and/or construction of nuclear power plants in accordance with the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, ``Domestic Licensing of
Production and Utilization Facilities,'' and Part 52, ``Licenses,
Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CP holders, as used in this Order, includes CPs, in active
or deferred status, as identified in Attachment 1 to this Order
(i.e., Watts Bar, Unit 2; and Bellefonte, Units 1 and 2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II
On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck off the coast
of the Japanese island of Honshu. The earthquake resulted in a large
tsunami, estimated to have exceeded 14 meters (45 feet) in height, that
inundated the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant site. The
earthquake and tsunami produced widespread devastation across
northeastern Japan and significantly affected the infrastructure and
industry in the northeastern coastal areas of Japan.
When the earthquake occurred, Fukushima Dai-ichi Units 1, 2, and 3
were in operation and Units 4, 5, and 6 were shut down for routine
refueling and maintenance activities. The Unit 4 reactor fuel was
offloaded to the Unit 4 spent fuel pool (SFP). Following the
earthquake, the three operating units automatically shut down and
offsite power was lost to the entire facility. The emergency diesel
generators (EDGs) started at all six units providing alternating
current (ac) electrical power to critical systems at each unit. The
facility response to the earthquake appears to have been normal.
Approximately 40 minutes following the earthquake and shutdown of
the operating units, the first large tsunami wave inundated the site,
followed by additional waves. The tsunami caused extensive damage to
site facilities and resulted in a complete loss of all ac electrical
power at Units 1 through 5, a condition known as station blackout. In
addition, all direct current electrical power was lost early in the
event on Units 1 and 2 and after some period of time at the other
units. Unit 6 retained the function of one air-cooled EDG. Despite
their actions, the operators lost the ability to cool the fuel in the
Unit 1 reactor after several hours, in the Unit 2 reactor after about
70 hours, and in the Unit 3 reactor after about 36 hours, resulting in
damage to the nuclear fuel shortly after the loss of cooling
capabilities.
Following the events at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant,
the NRC established a senior-level agency task force referred to as the
Near-Term Task Force (NTTF). The NTTF was tasked with conducting a
systematic and methodical review of the NRC regulations and processes
and determining if the agency should make additional improvements to
these programs in light of the events at Fukushima Dai-ichi. As a
result of this review, the NTTF developed a comprehensive set of
recommendations, documented in SECY-11-0093, ``Near-Term Report and
Recommendations for Agency Actions Following the Events in Japan,''
dated July 12, 2011. These recommendations were enhanced by the NRC
staff following interactions with stakeholders. Documentation of the
staff's efforts is contained in SECY-11-0124, ``Recommended Actions to
be Taken Without Delay From the Near-Term Task Force Report,'' dated
September 9, 2011, and SECY-11-0137, ``Prioritization of Recommended
Actions to be Taken in Response to Fukushima Lessons Learned,'' dated
October 3, 2011.
As directed by the Commission's staff requirements memorandum (SRM)
for SECY-11-0093, the NRC staff reviewed the NTTF recommendations
within the context of the NRC's existing regulatory framework and
considered the various regulatory vehicles available to the NRC to
implement the recommendations. SECY-11-0124 and SECY-11-0137
established the staff's prioritization of the recommendations based
upon the potential safety enhancements.
Since receiving the Commission's direction in SRM-SECY-11-0124 and
SRM-SECY-11-0137, the NRC staff conducted public meetings to discuss
enhanced mitigation strategies intended to maintain or restore core
cooling, containment, and SFP cooling capabilities following beyond-
design-basis external events. At these meetings, the industry described
its proposal for a Diverse and Flexible Mitigation Capability (FLEX),
as documented in the Nuclear Energy Institute's (NEI's) letter dated
December 16, 2011 (Agency Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Accession No. ML11353A008). FLEX is proposed as a strategy to
fulfill the key safety functions of core cooling, containment
integrity, and spent fuel cooling. Stakeholder input influenced the
staff to pursue a more performance-based approach to improve the safety
of operating power reactors than envisioned in NTTF Recommendation 4.2,
SECY-11-0124, and SECY-11-0137.
Current regulatory requirements and existing plant capabilities
allow the NRC to conclude that a sequence of events such as the
Fukushima Dai-ichi accident is unlikely to occur in the U.S. Therefore,
continued operation and continued licensing activities do not pose an
imminent threat to public health and safety. However, NRC's assessment
of new insights from the events at Fukushima Dai-ichi leads the staff
to conclude that additional requirements must be imposed on Licensees
or CP holders to increase the
[[Page 16092]]
capability of nuclear power plants to mitigate beyond-design-basis
external events. These additional requirements are needed to provide
adequate protection to public health and safety, as set forth in
Section III of this Order.
Guidance and strategies required by this Order would be available
if the loss of power, motive force, and normal access to the ultimate
heat sink to prevent fuel damage in the reactor and SFP, affected all
units at a site simultaneously. This Order requires a three-phase
approach for mitigating beyond-design-basis external events. The
initial phase requires the use of installed equipment and resources to
maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and SFP cooling. The
transition phase requires providing sufficient, portable, onsite
equipment and consumables to maintain or restore these functions until
they can be accomplished with resources brought from off site. The
final phase requires obtaining sufficient offsite resources to sustain
those functions indefinitely.
Additional details on an acceptable approach for complying with
this Order will be contained in final Interim Staff Guidance (ISG)
scheduled to be issued by the NRC in August 2012. This guidance will
also include a template to be used for the plan that will be submitted
in accordance with Section IV, Condition C.1 below.
III
Reasonable assurance of adequate protection of the public health
and safety and assurance of the common defense and security are the
fundamental NRC regulatory objectives. Compliance with NRC requirements
plays a critical role in giving the NRC confidence that Licensees or CP
holders are maintaining an adequate level of public health and safety
and common defense and security. While compliance with NRC requirements
presumptively assures adequate protection, new information may reveal
that additional requirements are warranted. In such situations, the
Commission may act in accordance with its statutory authority under
Section 161 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, to require
Licensees or CP holders to take action in order to protect health and
safety and common defense and security.
To protect public health and safety from the inadvertent release of
radioactive materials, the NRC's defense-in-depth strategy includes
multiple layers of protection: (1) Prevention of accidents by virtue of
the design, construction, and operation of the plant; (2) mitigation
features to prevent radioactive releases should an accident occur; and
(3) emergency preparedness programs that include measures such as
sheltering and evacuation. The defense-in-depth strategy also provides
for multiple physical barriers to contain the radioactive materials in
the event of an accident. The barriers are the fuel cladding, the
reactor coolant pressure boundary, and the containment. These defense-
in-depth features are embodied in the existing regulatory requirements
and thereby provide adequate protection of the public health and
safety.
Following the events of September 11, 2001, the NRC issued Order
EA-02-026, dated February 25, 2002, which required Licensees to develop
mitigating strategies related to the key safety functions of core
cooling, containment, and SFP cooling. NEI Document 06-12, ``B.5.b
Phase 2 & 3 Submittal Guideline'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML070090060)
provides guidelines that describe the necessary mitigating strategies.
The NRC endorsed these guidelines in a letter dated December 22, 2006,
designated as Official Use Only. Those mitigating strategies were
developed in the context of a localized event that was envisioned to
challenge portions of a single unit. The events at Fukushima, however,
demonstrate that beyond-design-basis external events may adversely
affect: (1) More than one unit at a site with two or more units, and
(2) multiple safety functions at each of several units located on the
same site.
The events at Fukushima further highlight the possibility that
extreme natural phenomena could challenge the prevention, mitigation,
and emergency preparedness defense-in-depth layers. To address the
uncertainties associated with beyond-design-basis external events, the
NRC is requiring additional defense-in-depth measures at licensed
nuclear power reactors so that the NRC can continue to have reasonable
assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety in
mitigating the consequences of a beyond-design-basis external event.
The strategies and guidance developed and implemented by Licensees
or CP holders in response to the requirements imposed by this Order
will provide the necessary capabilities to supplement those of the
permanently installed plant structures, systems, and components that
could become unavailable following beyond-design-basis external events.
These strategies and guidance will enhance the safety and preparedness
capabilities established following September 11, 2001, and codified as
10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2). In order to address the potential for more
widespread effects of beyond design basis external events, this Order
requires strategies with increased capacity to implement protective
actions concurrently at multiple units at a site. The strategies shall
be developed to add multiple ways to maintain or restore core cooling,
containment and SFP cooling capabilities in order to improve the
defense-in-depth of licensed nuclear power reactors.
The Commission has determined that ensuring adequate protection of
public health and safety requires that power reactor Licensees and CP
holders develop, implement and maintain guidance and strategies to
restore or maintain core cooling, containment, and SFP cooling
capabilities in the event of a beyond-design-basis external event.
These new requirements provide a greater mitigation capability
consistent with the overall defense-in-depth philosophy, and,
therefore, greater assurance that the challenges posed by beyond-
design-basis external events to power reactors do not pose an undue
risk to public health and safety. In order to provide reasonable
assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety, all
operating reactor licenses and CPs under Part 50 identified in
Attachment 1 to this Order shall be modified to include the
requirements identified in Attachment 2 to this Order. All combined
licenses (COLs) under 10 CFR part 52 identified in Attachment 1 to this
Order shall be modified to include the requirements identified in
Attachment 3 to this Order.
Accordingly, the NRC has concluded that these measures are
necessary to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety
under the provisions of the backfit rule, 10 CFR 50.109(a)(4)(ii), and
is requiring Licensee or CP holder action. In addition, pursuant to 10
CFR 2.202, the NRC finds that the public health, safety and interest
require that this Order be made immediately effective.
IV
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 161b, 161i, 161o, and 182 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations
in 10 CFR 2.202, and 10 CFR Parts 50 and 52, it is hereby ordered,
effective immediately, that all licenses and construction permits
identified in attachment 1 to this order are modified as follows:
A. 1. All holders of CPs issued under Part 50 shall,
notwithstanding the provisions of any Commission regulation or CPs to
the contrary, comply with the requirements described in Attachment 2 to
this Order except to the extent that a more stringent
[[Page 16093]]
requirement is set forth in the CP. These CP holders shall complete
full implementation prior to issuance of an operating license.
2. All holders of operating licenses issued under Part 50 shall,
notwithstanding the provisions of any Commission regulation or license
to the contrary, comply with the requirements described in Attachment 2
to this Order except to the extent that a more stringent requirement is
set forth in the license. These Licensees shall promptly start
implementation of the requirements in Attachment 2 to the Order and
shall complete full implementation no later than two (2) refueling
cycles after submittal of the overall integrated plan, as required in
Condition C.1.a, or December 31, 2016, whichever comes first.
3. All holders of COLs issued under Part 52 shall, notwithstanding
the provisions of any Commission regulation or license to the contrary,
comply with the requirements described in Attachment 3 to this Order
except to the extent that a more stringent requirement is set forth in
the license. These Licensees shall promptly start implementation of the
requirements in Attachment 3 to the Order and shall complete full
implementation prior to initial fuel load.
B.1. All Licensees and CP holders shall, within twenty (20) days of
the date of this Order, notify the Commission, (1) if they are unable
to comply with any of the requirements described in Attachment 2 or
Attachment 3, (2) if compliance with any of the requirements is
unnecessary in their specific circumstances, or (3) if implementation
of any of the requirements would cause the Licensee or CP holder to be
in violation of the provisions of any Commission regulation or the
facility license. The notification shall provide the Licensee's or CP
holder's justification for seeking relief from or variation of any
specific requirement.
2. Any Licensee or CP holder that considers that implementation of
any of the requirements described in Attachment 2 or Attachment 3 to
this Order would adversely impact safe and secure operation of the
facility must notify the Commission, within twenty (20) days of this
Order, of the adverse safety impact, the basis for its determination
that the requirement has an adverse safety impact, and either a
proposal for achieving the same objectives specified in Attachment 2 or
Attachment 3 requirement in question, or a schedule for modifying the
facility to address the adverse safety condition. If neither approach
is appropriate, the Licensee or CP holder must supplement its response
to Condition B.1 of this Order to identify the condition as a
requirement with which it cannot comply, with attendant justifications
as required in Condition B.1.
C.1. a. All holders of operating licenses issued under Part 50
shall by February 28, 2013, submit to the Commission for review an
overall integrated plan including a description of how compliance with
the requirements described in Attachment 2 will be achieved.
b. All holders of CPs issued under Part 50 or COLs issued under
Part 52 shall, within one (1) year after issuance of the final ISG,
submit to the Commission for review an overall integrated plan
including a description of how compliance with the requirements
described in Attachment 2 or Attachment 3 will be achieved.
2. All Licensees and holders of CPs shall provide an initial status
report sixty (60) days following issuance of the final ISG and at six
(6)-month intervals following submittal of the overall integrated plan,
as required in Condition C.1, which delineates progress made in
implementing the requirements of this Order.
3. All Licensees and CP holders shall report to the Commission when
full compliance with the requirements described in Attachment 2 or
Attachment 3 is achieved.
Licensee or CP holders responses to Conditions B.1, B.2, C.1, C.2,
and C.3, above shall be submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.4 and 10
CFR 52.3, as applicable.
As applicable, the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
or the Director, Office of New Reactors may, in writing, relax or
rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by the Licensee
or CP holder of good cause.
V
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, the Licensee or CP holder must,
and any other person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an
answer to this Order, and may request a hearing on this Order, within
20 days of the date of this Order. Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending the time to answer or to
request a hearing. A request for extension of time in which to submit
an answer or request a hearing must be made in writing to the Director,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation or to the Director, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and
include a statement of good cause for the extension. The answer may
consent to this Order.
If a hearing is requested by a Licensee, CP holder or a person
whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an
Order designating the time and place of any hearings. If a hearing is
held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this
Order should be sustained. Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), the
licensee, CP holder or any other person adversely affected by this
Order, may, in addition to demanding a hearing, at the time the answer
is filed or sooner, move the presiding officer to set aside the
immediate effectiveness of the Order on the ground that the Order,
including the need for immediate effectiveness, is not based on
adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, unfounded allegations, or
error.
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c),
must be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139,
August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit
and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not
submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the
Office of the Secretary by email at hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by
telephone at (301) 415-1677, to request (1) a digital ID certificate,
which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to
digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal server for any
proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise the Secretary
that the participant will be submitting a request or petition for
hearing (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or
representative, already holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate).
Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish an electronic
docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not
already established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on
[[Page 16094]]
NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-certificates.html. System requirements for accessing the E-
Submittal server are detailed in NRC's ``Guidance for Electronic
Submission,'' which is available on the agency's public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants may
attempt to use other software not listed on the web site, but should
note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted software,
and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance
in using unlisted software.
If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the
document using the NRC's online, web-based submission form. In order to
serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange, users will
be required to install a web browser plug-in from the NRC web site.
Further information on the web-based submission form, including the
installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on the NRC's
public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in
Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access
to the document to the NRC Office of the General Counsel and any others
who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document
via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the agency's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at (866) 672-7640. The
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for
serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered
complete by first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or
by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing
the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer,
having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer
subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in
NRC's electronic hearing docket, which is available to the public at
https://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the
Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to
include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers,
home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC
regulation or other law requires submission of such information. With
respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve
the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted
materials in their submission.
If a person other than the Licensee or CP holder requests a
hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in
which his interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall
address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d).
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of
an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions
specified in Section IV above shall be final twenty (20) days from the
date of this Order without further order or proceedings. If an
extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the
provisions specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension
expires if a hearing request has not been received. An answer or a
request for hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this
order.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated this 12th day of March 2012.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Michael R. Johnson,
Director, Office of New Reactors.
Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active
or Deferred Status
Arkansas Nuclear One
Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368, License Nos.
DPR-51 and NPF-6
Mr. Christopher J. Schwarz, Vice President, Operations, Entergy
Operations, Inc., Arkansas Nuclear One, 1448 S.R. 333, Russellville, AR
72802
Beaver Valley Power Station
First Energy Nuclear Operating Co., Docket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412,
License Nos. DPR-66 and NPF-73
Mr. Paul A. Harden, Site Vice President, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company, Mail Stop A-BV-SEB1, P.O. Box 4, Route 168, Shippingport, PA
15077
Bellefonte Nuclear Power Station
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket Nos. 50-438 and 50-439, Construction
Permit Nos. CPPR No. 122 and CPPR No. 123
Mr. Michael D. Skaggs, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Generation
Development and Construction, Tennessee Valley Authority, 6A Lookout
Place, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
[[Page 16095]]
Braidwood Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket Nos. STN 50-456 and STN 50-457,
License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296,
License Nos. DPR-33, DPR-52 and DPR-68
Mr. Preston D. Swafford, Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice
President, Tennessee Valley Authority, 3R Lookout Place, 1101 Market
Street, Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
Carolina Power & Light Co., Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324, License Nos.
DPR-71 and DPR-62
Mr. Michael J. Annacone, Vice President, Carolina Power & Light
Company, Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, P.O. Box 10429, Southport, NC
28461
Byron Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket Nos. STN 50-454 and STN 50-455,
License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
Callaway Plant
Union Electric Co., Docket No. 50-483, License No. NPF-30
Mr. Adam C. Heflin, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
Union Electric Company, P.O. Box 620, Fulton, MO 65251
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318,
License Nos. DPR-53 and DPR-69
Mr. George H. Gellrich, Vice President, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power
Plant, LLC, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, 1650 Calvert Cliffs
Parkway, Lusby, MD 20657-4702
Catawba Nuclear Station
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414, License Nos.
NPF-35 and NPF-52
Mr. James R. Morris, Site Vice President, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC,
Catawba Nuclear Station, 4800 Concord Road, York, SC 29745
Clinton Power Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket No. 50-461, License No. NPF-62
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
Columbia Generating Station
Energy Northwest, Docket No. 50-397, License No. NPF-21
Mr. Mark E. Reddemann, Chief Executive Officer, Energy Northwest, MD
1023, P.O. Box 968, Richland, WA 99352
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant
Luminant Generation Co., LLC, Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446, License
Nos. NPF-87 and NPF-89
Mr. Rafael Flores, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
Luminant Generation Company, LLC, Attn: Regulatory Affairs, P.O. Box
1002, Glen Rose, TX 76043
Cooper Nuclear Station
Nebraska Public Power District, Docket No. 50-298, License No. DPR-46
Mr. Brian J. O'Grady, Vice President--Nuclear and Chief Nuclear
Officer, Nebraska Public Power District, 72676 648A Avenue, P.O. Box
98, Brownville, NE 68321
Crystal River Nuclear Generating Plant
Florida Power Corp., Docket No. 50-302, License No. DPR-72
Mr. Jon A. Franke, Vice President, Attn: Supervisor, Licensing &
Regulatory Affairs, Progress Energy, Inc., Crystal River Nuclear Plant
(NA2C), 15760 West Power Line Street, Crystal River, FL 34428-6708
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
First Energy Nuclear Operating Co., Docket No. 50-346, License No. NPF-
3
Mr. Barry S. Allen, Site Vice President, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company, c/o Davis-Besse NPS, 5501 N. State Route 2, Oak Harbor, OH
43449-9760
Diablo Canyon Power Plant
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323, License Nos.
DPR-80 and DPR-82
Mr. John T. Conway, Senior Vice President--Energy Supply and Chief
Nuclear Officer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Diablo Canyon Power
Plant, 77 Beale Street, Mail Code B32, San Francisco, CA 94105
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant
Indiana Michigan Power Co., Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316, License Nos.
DPR-58 and DPR-74
Mr. Lawrence J. Weber, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
Indiana Michigan Power Company, Nuclear Generation Group, One Cook
Place, Bridgman, MI 49106
Dresden Nuclear Power Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249, License Nos.
DPR-19 and DPR-25
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
Duane Arnold Energy Center
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, Docket No. 50-331, License No. DPR-49
Mr. Peter Wells, Site Vice President, NextEra Energy, Duane Arnold
Energy Center, 3277 DAEC Road, Palo, IA 52324-9785
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366, License
Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5
Mr. Dennis R. Madison, Vice President, Southern Nuclear Operating
Company, Inc., Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, 11028 Hatch Parkway North,
Baxley, GA 31513
Fermi
Detroit Edison Co., Docket No. 50-341, License No. NPF-43
Mr. Jack M. Davis, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
Detroit Edison Company, Fermi 2--210 NOC, 6400 North Dixie Highway,
Newport, MI 48166
Fort Calhoun Station
Omaha Public Power District, Docket No. 50-285, License No. DPR-40
Mr. David J. Bannister, Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Omaha
Public Power District, 444 South 16th St. Mall, Omaha, NE 68102-2247
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station
Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50-416, License No. NPF-29
Mr. Michael Perito, Vice President, Operations, Entergy Operations,
Inc., Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1, 7003 Bald Hill Road, Port
Gibson, MS 39150
H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant
Carolina Power & Light Co., Docket No. 50-261, License No. DPR-23
Mr. Robert J. Duncan II, Vice President, Carolina Power & Light
Company, 3581 West Entrance Road, Hartsville, SC 29550
Hope Creek Generating Station
PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Docket No. 50-354, License No. NPF-57
[[Page 16096]]
Mr. Thomas Joyce, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, PSEG Nuclear
LLC-N09, P. O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038
Indian Point Energy Center
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286,
License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64
Mr. John Ventosa, Vice President, Operations, Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc., Indian Point Energy Center, 450 Broadway, GSB, P.O.
Box 249, Buchanan, NY 10511-0249
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50-333, License No. DPR-59
Mike Colomb, Vice President, Operations, Entergy Nuclear Operations,
Inc., James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, P.O. Box 110, Lycoming,
NY 13093
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364, License
Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8
Mr. Tom Lynch, Vice President--Farley, Southern Nuclear Operating
Company, Inc., Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, 7388 North State Highway
95, Columbia, AL 36319
Kewaunee Power Station
Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc., Docket No. 50-305, License No. DPR-43
Mr. David A. Heacock, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Dominion
Energy Kewaunee, Inc., Innsbrook Technical Center, 5000 Dominion
Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711
LaSalle County Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374, License Nos.
NPF-11 and NPF-18
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
Limerick Generating Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353, License Nos.
NPF-39 and NPF-85
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
Millstone Nuclear Power Station
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., Docket Nos. 50-336 and 50-423,
License Nos. DPR-65 and NPF-49
Mr. David A. Heacock, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Dominion
Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., Innsbrook Technical Center, 5000 Dominion
Boulevard, Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant
Northern States Power Company, Docket No. 50-263, License No. DPR-22
Mr. Timothy J. O'Connor, Site Vice President, Northern States Power
Company--Minnesota, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, 2807 West
County Road 75, Monticello, MN 55362-9637
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410,
License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69
Mr. Ken Langdon, Vice President Nine Mile Point, Nine Mile Point
Nuclear Station, LLC, P. O. Box 63, Lycoming, NY 13093
North Anna Power Station
Virginia Electric & Power Co., Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339, License
Nos. NPF-4 and NPF-7
Mr. David A. Heacock, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Dominion
Nuclear, Innsbrook Technical Center, 5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen
Allen, VA 23060-6711
Oconee Nuclear Station
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287,
License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47 and DPR-55
Mr. Preston Gillespie, Site Vice President, Oconee Nuclear Station,
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, 7800 Rochester Highway, Seneca, SC 29672
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket No. 50-219, License No. DPR-16
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
Palisades Nuclear Plant
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50-255, License No. DPR-20
Mr. Anthony J. Vitale, Site Vice President--Palisades, Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc., Palisades Nuclear Plant, 27780 Blue Star Memorial
Highway, Covert, MI 49043
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station
Arizona Public Service Company, Docket Nos. STN 50-528, STN 50-529 and
STN 50-530, License Nos. NPF-41, NPF-51 and NPF-74
Mr. Randall K. Edington, Executive Vice President Nuclear and Chief
Nuclear Officer, Arizona Public Service Co., P. O. Box 52034, MS 7602,
Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278, License Nos.
DPR-44 and DPR-56
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
Perry Nuclear Power Plant
First Energy Nuclear Operating Co., Docket No. 50-440, License No. NPF-
58
Mr. Vito A. Kaminskas, Site Vice President--Nuclear--Perry, FirstEnergy
Nuclear Operating Company, Perry Nuclear Power Plant, 10 Center Road,
A290, Perry, OH 44081
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 1
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50-293, License No. DPR-35
Mr. Robert Smith, Vice President and Site Vice President, Entergy
Nuclear Operations, Inc., Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, 600 Rocky Hill
Road, Plymouth, MA 02360-5508
Point Beach Nuclear Plant
NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301, License
Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27
Mr. Larry Meyer, Site Vice President, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC,
Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers,
WI 54241-9516
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant
Northern States Power Co. Minnesota, Docket Nos. 50-282 and 50-306,
License Nos. DPR-42 and DPR-60
Mr. Mark A. Schimmel, Site Vice President, Northern States Power
Company--Minnesota, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, 1717
Wakonade Drive East, Welch, MN 55089-9642
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station
Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265, License Nos.
DPR-29 and DPR-30
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
[[Page 16097]]
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC, Docket No. 50-244, License No.
DPR-18
Mr. Joseph E. Pacher, Vice President, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant,
LLC, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, 1503 Lake Road, Ontario, NY 14519
River Bend Station
Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50-458, License No. NPF-47
Mr. Eric W. Olson, Vice President, Operations, Entergy Operations,
Inc., River Bend Station, 5485 U.S. Highway 61N, St. Francisville, LA
70775
Salem Nuclear Generating Station
PSEG Nuclear, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311, License Nos. DPR-70
and DPR-75
Mr. Thomas Joyce, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, PSEG Nuclear
LLC--N09, P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
Southern California Edison Co., Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362, License
Nos. NPF-10 and NPF-15
Mr. Peter T. Dietrich, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
Southern California Edison Company, San Onofre Nuclear Generating
Station, P.O. Box 128, San Clemente, CA 92674-0128
Seabrook
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, Docket No. 50-443, License No. NPF-86
Mr. Paul Freeman, Site Vice President, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, c/
o Mr. Michael O'Keefe, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300,
Seabrook, NH 03874
Sequoyah Nuclear Plant
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328, License Nos.
DPR-77 and DPR-79
Mr. Preston D. Swafford, Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice
President, Tennessee Valley Authority, 3R Lookout Place, 1101 Market
Street, Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
Carolina Power & Light Co., Docket No. 50-400, License No. NPF-63
Mr. Christopher L. Burton, Vice President, Progress Energy Carolinas,
Inc., Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, P.O. Box 165, Mail Zone 1,
New Hill, NC 27562-0165
South Texas Project
STP Nuclear Operating Co., Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499, License Nos.
NPF-76 and NPF-80
Mr. Edward D. Halpin, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Nuclear Officer, STP Nuclear Operating Company, South Texas Project,
P.O. Box 289, Wadsworth, TX 77483
St. Lucie Plant
Florida Power & Light Co., Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389, License Nos.
DPR-67 and NPF-16
Mr. Mano Nazar, Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
NextEra Energy, 700 Universe Boulevard, P.O. Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL
33408-0420
Surry Power Station
Virginia Electric & Power Co., Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281, License
Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-371
Mr. David A. Heacock, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Dominion
Nuclear, Innsbrook Technical Center, 5000 Dominion Boulevard, Glen
Allen, VA 23060-6711
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station
PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388, License Nos. NPF-
14 and NPF-22
Mr. Timothy S. Rausch, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
PPL Susquehanna, LLC, 769 Salem Boulevard, NUCSB3, Berwick, PA 18603-
0467
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1
(* via corrected letter dated 3/13/12--ML12073A366) Exelon Generation
Co., LLC, Docket No. 50-289, License No. DPR-50
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio, President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon
Nuclear, 4300 Winfield Road, Warrenville, IL 60555
Turkey Point
Florida Power & Light Co., Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251, License Nos.
DPR-31 and DPR-41
Mr. Mano Nazar, Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer,
NextEra Energy, 700 Universe Boulevard, P.O. Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL
33408-0420
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50-271, License No. DPR-28
Mr. Christopher J. Wamser, Site Vice President, Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, 320 Governor
Hunt Road, Vernon, VT 05354
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., Docket No. 50-395, License No. NPF-
12
Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin, Vice President Nuclear Operations, South Carolina
Electric & Gas Company, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Post Office
Box 88, Mail Code 300, Jenkinsville, SC 29065
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Docket Nos. 50-424 and 50-425, License
Nos. NPF-68 and NPF-81
Mr. Tom E. Tynan, Vice President, Southern Nuclear Operating Company,
Inc., Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, 7821 River Road, Waynesboro, GA
30830
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 3 & 4
Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Docket Nos. 52-025 and 52-026, License
Nos. NPF-91 and NPF-92
Mr. B. L. Ivey, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Southern Nuclear
Operating Company, Inc., 40 Inverness Center Parkway, Bin B022,
Birmingham, AL 35242
Waterford Steam Electric Station
Entergy Operations, Inc., Docket No. 50-382, License No. NPF-38
Ms. Donna Jacobs, Vice President, Operations, Entergy Operations, Inc.,
Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3, 17265 River Road, Killona, LA
70057-0751
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket No. 50-390, License No. NPF-90
Mr. Preston D. Swafford, Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice
President, Tennessee Valley Authority, 3R Lookout Place, 1101 Market
Street, Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2
Tennessee Valley Authority, Docket No. 50-391, Construction Permit No.
CPPR No. 092
Mr. Michael D. Skaggs, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Generation
Development and Construction, Tennessee Valley Authority, 6A Lookout
Place, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
William B. McGuire Nuclear Station
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370, License Nos.
NPF-9 and NPF-17
Mr. Regis T. Repko, Vice President, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, McGuire
Nuclear Site, 12700 Hagers Ferry Road, Huntersville, NC 28078
[[Page 16098]]
Wolf Creek Generating Station
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp., Docket No. 50-482, License No. NPF-
42
Mr. Matthew W. Sunseri, President and Chief Executive Officer, Wolf
Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation, P.O. Box 411, Burlington, KS 66839
Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External
Events at Operating Reactor Sites and Construction Permit Holders
This Order requires a three-phase approach for mitigating beyond-
design-basis external events. The initial phase requires the use of
installed equipment and resources to maintain or restore core cooling,
containment and spent fuel pool (SFP) cooling capabilities. The
transition phase requires providing sufficient, portable, onsite
equipment and consumables to maintain or restore these functions until
they can be accomplished with resources brought from off site. The
final phase requires obtaining sufficient offsite resources to sustain
those functions indefinitely.
(1) Licensees or construction permit (CP) holders shall develop,
implement, and maintain guidance and strategies to maintain or restore
core cooling, containment and SFP cooling capabilities following a
beyond-design-basis external event.
(2) These strategies must be capable of mitigating a simultaneous
loss of all alternating current (ac) power and loss of normal access to
the ultimate heat sink and have adequate capacity to address challenges
to core cooling, containment, and SFP cooling capabilities at all units
on a site subject to this Order.
(3) Licensees or CP holders must provide reasonable protection for
the associated equipment from external events. Such protection must
demonstrate that there is adequate capacity to address challenges to
core cooling, containment, and SFP cooling capabilities at all units on
a site subject to this Order.
(4) Licensees or CP holders must be capable of implementing the
strategies in all modes.
(5) Full compliance shall include procedures, guidance, training,
and acquisition, staging, or installing of equipment needed for the
strategies.
Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External
Events at Col Holder Reactor Sites (VOGTLE Units 3 and 4)
Attachment 2 to this order for Part 50 licensees requires a phased
approach for mitigating beyond-design-basis external events. The
initial phase requires the use of installed equipment and resources to
maintain or restore core cooling, containment and spent fuel pool (SFP)
cooling capabilities. The transition phase requires providing
sufficient, portable, onsite equipment and consumables to maintain or
restore these functions until they can be accomplished with resources
brought from off site. The final phase requires obtaining sufficient
offsite resources to sustain those functions indefinitely.
The design bases of Vogtle Units 3 and 4 includes passive design
features that provide core, containment and SFP cooling capability for
72 hours, without reliance on alternating current (ac) power. These
features do not rely on access to any external water sources since the
containment vessel and the passive containment cooling system serve as
the safety-related ultimate heat sink. The NRC staff reviewed these
design features prior to issuance of the combined licenses for these
facilities and certification of the AP1000 design referenced therein.
The AP1000 design also includes equipment to maintain required safety
functions in the long term (beyond 72 hours to 7 days) including
capability to replenish water supplies. Connections are provided for
generators and pumping equipment that can be brought to the site to
back up the installed equipment. The staff concluded in its final
safety evaluation report for the AP1000 design that the installed
equipment (and alternatively, the use of transportable equipment) is
capable of supporting extended operation of the passive safety systems
to maintain required safety functions in the long term. As such, this
Order requires Vogtle Units 3 and 4 to address the following
requirements relative to the final phase.
(1) Licensees shall develop, implement, and maintain guidance and
strategies to maintain or restore core cooling, containment and SFP
cooling capabilities following a beyond-design-basis external event.
(2) These strategies must be capable of mitigating a simultaneous
loss of all ac power and loss of normal access to the normal heat sink
and have adequate capacity to address challenges to core cooling,
containment, and SFP cooling capabilities at all units on a site
subject to this Order.
(3) Licensees must provide reasonable protection for the associated
equipment from external events. Such protection must demonstrate that
there is adequate capacity to address challenges to core cooling,
containment, and SFP cooling capabilities at all units on a site
subject to this Order.
(4) Licensees must be capable of implementing the strategies in all
modes.
(5) Full compliance shall include procedures, guidance, training,
and acquisition, staging, or installing of equipment needed for the
strategies.
[FR Doc. 2012-6547 Filed 3-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P