Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 15644-15646 [2012-6461]
Download as PDF
15644
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 1,
2012.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–6470 Filed 3–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0192; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–225–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A330–200 and –200
freighter series airplanes; and Model
A340–200, –300, –500, and –600 series
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by fuel system reviews
conducted by the manufacturer. This
proposed AD would require
modification of the control circuit for
the fuel pumps for the center fuel tanks
for certain airplanes, and center and rear
fuel tanks for certain other airplanes.
We are proposing this AD to prevent the
potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with
flammable fuel vapors, could result in
fuel tank explosions and consequent
loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Mar 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
425–227–1138; fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2012–0192; Directorate Identifier
2011–NM–225–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011–0196,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
dated October 7, 2011 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
* * * [T]he FAA issued a set of new rules
related to Fuel Tank Safety including Special
Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 88. In
line with SFAR88, the JAA [Joint Aviation
Authorities] issued policy JAA INT/POL 25/
12 and recommended to the National
Aviation Authorities (NAA) the application
of a similar regulation.
To ensure compliance with the
requirements set by SFAR88 and JAA INT/
POL 25/12, this [EASA] AD requires that
Ground Fault Interrupters (GFI) are installed
into the electrical power supply circuits of
fuel pumps for which the canisters become
uncovered during normal operation, taking
into account normal fuel reserve or the fuel
level, triggering the low fuel level warning.
The function of this additional system
protection is to electrically isolate the pump
if a ground fault condition occurs
downstream of the GFI. The GFI gives
additional earth leakage protection to the
downstream circuit.
The unsafe condition is the potential of
ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the
airplane. The corrective action is
modifying the control circuits of the fuel
pump for the rear and center fuel tanks.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
The FAA has examined the
underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large
transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the
service history of airplanes subject to
those regulations, and existing
maintenance practices for fuel tank
systems. As a result of those findings,
we issued a regulation titled ‘‘Transport
Airplane Fuel Tank System Design
Review, Flammability Reduction and
Maintenance and Inspection
Requirements’’ (66 FR 23086, May 7,
2001). In addition to new airworthiness
standards for transport airplanes and
new maintenance requirements, this
rule included Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (‘‘SFAR 88,’’
Amendment 21–78, and subsequent
Amendments 21–82 and 21–83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 (66 FR
23086, May 7, 2001) requires certain
type design (i.e., type certificate (TC)
and supplemental type certificate (STC))
holders to substantiate that their fuel
tank systems can prevent ignition
sources in the fuel tanks. This
requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered
transport airplanes and for subsequent
modifications to those airplanes. It
requires them to perform design reviews
E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM
16MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
and to develop design changes and
maintenance procedures if their designs
do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble
to the rule, we intended to adopt
airworthiness directives to mandate any
changes found necessary to address
unsafe conditions identified as a result
of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we
have established four criteria intended
to define the unsafe conditions
associated with fuel tank systems that
require corrective actions. The
percentage of operating time during
which fuel tanks are exposed to
flammable conditions is one of these
criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation:
single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s),
and in-service failure experience. For all
four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken
that may mitigate the need for further
action.
The Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA)
has issued a regulation that is similar to
SFAR 88 (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001).
(The JAA is an associated body of the
European Civil Aviation Conference
(ECAC) representing the civil aviation
regulatory authorities of a number of
European States who have agreed to cooperate in developing and
implementing common safety regulatory
standards and procedures.) Under this
regulation, the JAA stated that all
members of the ECAC that hold type
certificates for transport category
airplanes are required to conduct a
design review against explosion risks.
We have determined that the actions
identified in this proposed AD are
necessary to reduce the potential of
ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the
airplane.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued the following
mandatory service bulletins. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
• Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–28–3113, dated July 19, 2011 (for
Model A330–200 and –200 freighter
series airplanes).
• Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A340–28–4129, dated July 19, 2011 (for
Model A340–200 and –300 series
airplanes).
• Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A340–28–5051, dated September 1,
2011 (for Model A340–500 and –600
series airplanes).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Mar 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 29 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 10 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $3,480 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these parts. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$125,570, or $4,330 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15645
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2012–0192;
Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–225–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by April 30,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes specified
in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this
AD, certificated in any category.
(1) Airbus Model A330–201, –202, –203,
–223, and –243 airplanes; all serial numbers;
except those on which Airbus modification
200242 has been accomplished in
production.
(2) Airbus Model A330–223F and –243F
airplanes; all serial numbers; except
airplanes on which Airbus modification
58623 has been accomplished in production
and on which Airbus modification 200281
has not been accomplished in production;
and airplanes on which modification 200242
has been accomplished in production.
E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM
16MRP1
15646
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(3) Airbus Model A340–211, –212, –213,
–311, –312, –313, –541, and –642 airplanes;
all serial numbers; except airplanes on which
Airbus modification 200242 has been
accomplished in production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28: Fuel.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We
are issuing this AD to prevent the potential
of ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which,
in combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in fuel tank explosions and
consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Actions
Within 48 months after the effective date
of this AD, do the actions specified in
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) For Model A330–200 and –200F series
airplanes, and Model A340–200 and –300
series airplanes: Modify the control circuit
for the fuel pump for the center fuel tank, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330–28–3113, dated July 19, 2011
(for Model A330–200 and –200 freighter
series airplanes); or A340–28–4129, dated
July 19, 2011 (for Model A340–200 and –300
series airplanes).
(2) For Model A340–500 and –600 series
airplanes: Modify the control circuit for the
fuel pump for the rear and/or center fuel
tanks, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–28–5051,
dated September 1, 2011.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone 425–227–1138; fax 425–227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:45 Mar 15, 2012
Jkt 226001
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(i) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive
2011–0196, dated October 7, 2011, and the
service bulletins specified in paragraphs
(i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD, for related
information.
(1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–28–3113, dated July 19, 2011.
(2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A340–28–4129, dated July 19, 2011.
(3) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A340–28–5051, dated September 1, 2011.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 1,
2012.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–6461 Filed 3–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
speak and outlines of topics to be
discussed at the public hearing must be
received by Tuesday, April 17, 2012.
The public hearing is being
held in the auditorium of the Internal
Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20224.
ADDRESSES:
Due to building security procedures,
visitors must enter at the Constitution
Avenue entrance. Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–168745–03); Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC. Submissions may be hand delivered
Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–168745–03)
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC. Alternatively,
comments may be transmitted
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. (IRS–REG–
168745–03).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Funmi Taylor of the Publications and
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing
Division, Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedures and Administration), at
(202) 622–7180 (not a toll-free number).
A notice
of change date of public hearing on
proposed rulemaking appearing in the
Federal Register on Monday, January
23, 2012 (77 FR 3210), announced that
a public hearing relating to the
deduction and capitalization of
expenditures related to tangible
property, would be held on Wednesday,
April 25, 2012 at 10 a.m., in the
auditorium of the Internal Revenue
Service Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–168745–03]
RIN 1545–BE18
Guidance Regarding Deduction and
Capitalization of Expenditures Related
to Tangible Property; Hearing
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Change date of public hearing
on proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document changes the
date of a public hearing on proposed
regulations relating to the deduction
and capitalization of expenditures
related to tangible property.
DATES: The public hearing originally
scheduled for Wednesday, April 25,
2012, at 10 a.m. is rescheduled for
Wednesday, May 9, 2012, at 10 a.m.
Written or electronically submitted
public comments along with requests to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The date of the public hearing has
been changed. The hearing is now
scheduled for Wednesday, May 9, 2012,
beginning at 10 a.m. in the auditorium
of the Internal Revenue Service Building
at 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC. Requests to speak and
outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing must be received by
Tuesday, April 17, 2012.
LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel, (Procedures and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2012–6371 Filed 3–15–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM
16MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15644-15646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6461]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0192; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-225-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A330-200 and -200 freighter series airplanes; and
Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes. This proposed AD
was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. This
proposed AD would require modification of the control circuit for the
fuel pumps for the center fuel tanks for certain airplanes, and center
and rear fuel tanks for certain other airplanes. We are proposing this
AD to prevent the potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel
tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-
1138; fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0192;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-225-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011-0196, dated October 7, 2011 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
* * * [T]he FAA issued a set of new rules related to Fuel Tank
Safety including Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 88. In
line with SFAR88, the JAA [Joint Aviation Authorities] issued policy
JAA INT/POL 25/12 and recommended to the National Aviation
Authorities (NAA) the application of a similar regulation.
To ensure compliance with the requirements set by SFAR88 and JAA
INT/POL 25/12, this [EASA] AD requires that Ground Fault
Interrupters (GFI) are installed into the electrical power supply
circuits of fuel pumps for which the canisters become uncovered
during normal operation, taking into account normal fuel reserve or
the fuel level, triggering the low fuel level warning.
The function of this additional system protection is to
electrically isolate the pump if a ground fault condition occurs
downstream of the GFI. The GFI gives additional earth leakage
protection to the downstream circuit.
The unsafe condition is the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane. The
corrective action is modifying the control circuits of the fuel pump
for the rear and center fuel tanks. You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a
regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review,
Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule
included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,''
Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001) requires
certain type design (i.e., type certificate (TC) and supplemental type
certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate that their fuel tank systems
can prevent ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement
applies to type design holders for large turbine-powered transport
airplanes and for subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It
requires them to perform design reviews
[[Page 15645]]
and to develop design changes and maintenance procedures if their
designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety standards. As explained in
the preamble to the rule, we intended to adopt airworthiness directives
to mandate any changes found necessary to address unsafe conditions
identified as a result of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation: single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure
experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for
further action.
The Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) has issued a regulation that
is similar to SFAR 88 (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). (The JAA is an
associated body of the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC)
representing the civil aviation regulatory authorities of a number of
European States who have agreed to co-operate in developing and
implementing common safety regulatory standards and procedures.) Under
this regulation, the JAA stated that all members of the ECAC that hold
type certificates for transport category airplanes are required to
conduct a design review against explosion risks.
We have determined that the actions identified in this proposed AD
are necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued the following mandatory service bulletins. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-28-3113, dated July
19, 2011 (for Model A330-200 and -200 freighter series airplanes).
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-28-4129, dated July
19, 2011 (for Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes).
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-28-5051, dated
September 1, 2011 (for Model A340-500 and -600 series airplanes).
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 29 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 10 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $3,480 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $125,570, or $4,330 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2012-0192; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-
225-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by April 30, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the airplanes specified in paragraphs (c)(1),
(c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in any category.
(1) Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and -243 airplanes;
all serial numbers; except those on which Airbus modification 200242
has been accomplished in production.
(2) Airbus Model A330-223F and -243F airplanes; all serial
numbers; except airplanes on which Airbus modification 58623 has
been accomplished in production and on which Airbus modification
200281 has not been accomplished in production; and airplanes on
which modification 200242 has been accomplished in production.
[[Page 15646]]
(3) Airbus Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, -313, -541,
and -642 airplanes; all serial numbers; except airplanes on which
Airbus modification 200242 has been accomplished in production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential of
ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in combination with
flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank explosions and
consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Actions
Within 48 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) For Model A330-200 and -200F series airplanes, and Model
A340-200 and -300 series airplanes: Modify the control circuit for
the fuel pump for the center fuel tank, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330-28-3113, dated July 19, 2011 (for Model A330-200 and -200
freighter series airplanes); or A340-28-4129, dated July 19, 2011
(for Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes).
(2) For Model A340-500 and -600 series airplanes: Modify the
control circuit for the fuel pump for the rear and/or center fuel
tanks, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-28-5051, dated September 1, 2011.
(h) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone 425-
227-1138; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(i) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2011-0196, dated October 7, 2011, and the
service bulletins specified in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3)
of this AD, for related information.
(1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-28-3113, dated July
19, 2011.
(2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-28-4129, dated July
19, 2011.
(3) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-28-5051, dated
September 1, 2011.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 1, 2012.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-6461 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P