Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board Membership, 15104-15105 [2012-6178]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15104
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Notices
pesticide market rather than conduct
testing, and, under the ‘‘opt-out’’
provision, were required to cease,
within 6 months of EPA issuing the test
order, all sales and distribution of their
chemical for use in pesticide
formulations.
EPA is not pursuing further test
orders at this time for these chemicals.
None meet the criteria for new test
orders under SDWA, and dialogue with
pesticide trade associations indicates
that member companies are unlikely to
develop data in response to further
FFDCA test orders. Instead, EPA intends
to no longer approve the use of these
inert ingredients in pesticide
registration applications or
reformulations unless a commenter
commits to submitting required data.
The effective date for this action would
be the same effective date that EPA has
proposed for revoking the tolerance
exemptions for methyl ethyl ketone and
diethyl phthalate; that is, 6 months after
the date EPA publishes the tolerance
revocation final rule. You can find the
proposed rule in this issue of the
Federal Register. For products already
in the marketplace, EPA intends to take
appropriate action to ensure registrants
either reformulate or cancel those
products. If necessary, EPA will issue
test orders (product-specific Data CallIns). EPA also is reminding registrants
that current regulations require them to
amend any pesticide product
registrations before selling a pesticide
product with a composition different
from that listed on the approved
Confidential Statement of Formula.
EPA believes its proposed timeline for
no longer approving use of these
chemicals as inert ingredients gives
registrants sufficient time to take
appropriate action. Under the EDSP test
orders, the manufacturers and importers
that ‘‘opted out’’ of testing had to cease
all sales and distribution to the
pesticide market within 6 months of
EPA issuing the test order. EPA issued
the last test orders for these chemicals
on January 28, 2010, so all sales and
distribution of methyl ethyl ketone,
butyl benzyl phthalate, dibutyl
phthalate, diethyl phthalate, and
dimethyl phthalate for use in pesticide
formulations were to have ceased as of
July 28, 2010. EPA has also been
performing outreach to trade groups to
inform them about the potential loss of
these chemicals as inert ingredients.
This Federal Register document
provides further notice.
To help companies avoid formulating
new product with methyl ethyl ketone,
butyl benzyl phthalate, dibutyl
phthalate, diethyl phthalate, and
dimethyl phthalate, EPA plans to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Mar 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
remove them from its lists of approved
inert ingredients. These lists, now
consolidated in a web-searchable
database called ‘‘InertFinder’’ (https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/inertfinder), are
informational only. Adding or removing
a chemical from these lists is not a
regulatory action. InertFinder points
users to the Code of Federal Regulations
as the legal record for uses that require
a tolerance or tolerance exemption for
residues on raw agricultural
commodities or processed food. For
inert ingredient uses that do not require
a tolerance or exemption (such as
nonfood- only uses), InertFinder helps
formulators find chemicals that EPA has
previously approved for use as inert
ingredients in pesticide products.
B. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
The statutory authority for the
Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
is described in detail in a companion
document in this issue of the Federal
Register which proposes to revoke the
tolerance exemptions for methyl ethyl
ketone and diethyl phthalate, and in a
Federal Register notice titled,
‘‘Endocrine Disruptor Screening
Program; Policies and Procedures for
Initial Screening,’’ (74 FR 17560),
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-200904-15/pdf/E9-8706.pdf.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Endocrine
disruptors, Pesticides and pests.
Dated: February 17, 2012.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012–6164 Filed 3–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–ORD–2012–0175; FRL–9647–1]
Environmental Laboratory Advisory
Board Membership
U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice Soliciting Nominations
for Membership.
AGENCY:
The EPA invites nominations
from a diverse range of qualified
candidates to be considered for
appointment to the Environmental
Laboratory Advisory Board (ELAB). The
ELAB is a multi-stakeholder federal
advisory committee that provides
independent advice and
recommendations to the EPA
Administrator, Science Advisor, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Forum on Environmental Measurements
about cross-cutting issues related to
enhancing measurement programs in
the EPA, and facilitating the operation
and expansion of national
environmental accreditation.
This notice solicits nominations to fill
six new vacancies. To maintain diverse
representation, nominees will be
selected from the following stakeholder
work force sectors:
• Academia.
• Business and industry.
• Environmental laboratory
commercial, municipal, small, other.
• Environmental laboratory suppliers
of services.
• State and local government
agencies.
• Tribal governments and indigenous
groups.
• Trade associations.
Within these sectors, the EPA is
seeking nominees with knowledge in
methods development; measurements;
monitoring and regulatory programs;
quality systems; and environmental
accreditation. In an effort to obtain
nominations of diverse candidates, the
EPA encourages nominations of women
and men of all racial and ethnic groups.
All nominations will be fully
considered.
Any interested person or organization
may nominate qualified persons to be
considered for appointment to this
advisory committee. Individuals may
self-nominate. Nominees should possess
the following qualifications:
• Demonstrated experience with
environmental measurement programs
and environmental accreditation;
• Willingness to commit time to the
committee, and demonstrated ability to
work constructively and effectively on
committees;
• Excellent interpersonal, oral, and
written communication and consensusbuilding skills; and
• Ability to serve a two-year
appointment and volunteer
approximately five to seven hours per
month to support the activities of the
ELAB.
How to Submit Nominations:
Nominations can be submitted in
electronic format (preferred) to Lara P.
Autry, Designated Federal Officer, US
EPA, MC E243–05, 109 T. W. Alexander
Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709, or emailed to autry.lara@epa.gov
and should be received by April 13,
2012 for October 2012 appointment. To
be considered, all nomination packages
should include:
• Current contact information for the
nominee, including the nominee’s
name, organization (and position within
that organization), current business
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Notices
address, email address, and daytime
telephone number.
• A brief statement describing the
nominee’s interest in serving on the
ELAB.
• A resume describing the
professional and educational
qualifications of the nominee, including
a list of relevant activities, and any
current or previous service on advisory
committees.
• Letter(s) of recommendation from a
third party supporting the nomination.
For further questions regarding this
notice, please contact Lara P. Autry on
(919) 541–5544 or autry.lara@epa.gov.
Dated: March 7, 2012.
Lek Kadeli,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012–6178 Filed 3–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collections Being
Submitted for Review and Approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid control number. No
person shall be subject to any penalty
for failing to comply with a collection
of information subject to the PRA that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Mar 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted on or before April 13, 2012.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contacts below as soon as
possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB, via fax 202–
395–5167, or via email
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov; and
to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email
PRA@fcc.gov
and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. Include
in the comments the OMB control
number as shown in the
‘‘Supplementary Information’’ section
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection, contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918. To view a
copy of this information collection
request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go
to the Web page ,
(2) look for the section of the Web page
called ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3)
click on the downward-pointing arrow
in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the
‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4)
select ‘‘Federal Communications
Commission’’ from the list of agencies
presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box,
(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the
right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6)
when the list of FCC ICRs currently
under review appears, look for the OMB
control number of this ICR and then
click on the ICR Reference Number. A
copy of the FCC submission to OMB
will be displayed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0027.
Title: Application for Construction
Permit for Commercial Broadcast
Station, FCC Form 301.
Form Number: FCC Form 301.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business and other forprofit entities; Not for profit entities;
State, local or Tribal governments.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 4,604 respondents and 8,040
responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1–6.25
hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15105
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement; Third party
disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 20,497 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $90,659,382.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. The statutory
authority for this collection of
information is contained in Sections
154(i), 303 and 308 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality with
this collection of information.
Privacy Impact Assessment(s): No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On January 28, 2010,
the Commission adopted a First Report
and Order and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (‘‘First R&O’’) in
MB Docket No. 09–52, FCC 10–24. To
enhance the ability of federally
recognized Native American Tribes to
provide vital radio services to their
citizens on Tribal lands, in the First
R&O the Commission established a
Tribal Priority for use in its radio
licensing procedures. On March 3, 2011,
the Commission adopted a Second
Report and Order (‘‘Second R&O’’), First
Order on Reconsideration, and Second
Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making
in MB Docket No. 09–52, FCC 11–28.
On December 28, 2011, the Commission
adopted a Third Report and Order in
MB Docket No. 09–52, FCC 11–190
(‘‘Third R&O’’). In the Third R&O the
Commission further refined the use of
the Tribal Priority in the commercial
FM context, specifically adopting a
‘‘threshold qualifications’’ approach to
commercial FM application processing.
In the commercial FM context, the
Tribal Priority is applied at the
allotment stage of the licensing process.
A Tribe or Tribal entity initiates the
process by petitioning that a new Tribal
Allotment be added to the FM Table of
Allotments using the Tribal Priority. A
petitioner seeking to add a Tribal
Allotment to the FM Table of
Allotments, like all other FM allotment
proponents, must file FCC Form 301
when submitting its Petition for Rule
Making. Under the new ‘‘threshold
qualification’’ procedures adopted in
the Third R&O, once a Tribal Allotment
has been successfully added to the FM
Table of Allotments using the Tribal
Priority through an FM allocations
rulemaking, the Commission will
announce by Public Notice a Threshold
Qualifications Window (‘‘TQ
Window’’). During the TQ Window, any
Tribe or Tribal entity that could qualify
to add that particular Tribal Allotment
may file an FCC Form 301 application
for that Tribal Allotment. Such an
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15104-15105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6178]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-ORD-2012-0175; FRL-9647-1]
Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board Membership
AGENCY: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice Soliciting Nominations for Membership.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA invites nominations from a diverse range of qualified
candidates to be considered for appointment to the Environmental
Laboratory Advisory Board (ELAB). The ELAB is a multi-stakeholder
federal advisory committee that provides independent advice and
recommendations to the EPA Administrator, Science Advisor, and Forum on
Environmental Measurements about cross-cutting issues related to
enhancing measurement programs in the EPA, and facilitating the
operation and expansion of national environmental accreditation.
This notice solicits nominations to fill six new vacancies. To
maintain diverse representation, nominees will be selected from the
following stakeholder work force sectors:
Academia.
Business and industry.
Environmental laboratory commercial, municipal, small,
other.
Environmental laboratory suppliers of services.
State and local government agencies.
Tribal governments and indigenous groups.
Trade associations.
Within these sectors, the EPA is seeking nominees with knowledge in
methods development; measurements; monitoring and regulatory programs;
quality systems; and environmental accreditation. In an effort to
obtain nominations of diverse candidates, the EPA encourages
nominations of women and men of all racial and ethnic groups. All
nominations will be fully considered.
Any interested person or organization may nominate qualified
persons to be considered for appointment to this advisory committee.
Individuals may self-nominate. Nominees should possess the following
qualifications:
Demonstrated experience with environmental measurement
programs and environmental accreditation;
Willingness to commit time to the committee, and
demonstrated ability to work constructively and effectively on
committees;
Excellent interpersonal, oral, and written communication
and consensus-building skills; and
Ability to serve a two-year appointment and volunteer
approximately five to seven hours per month to support the activities
of the ELAB.
How to Submit Nominations: Nominations can be submitted in
electronic format (preferred) to Lara P. Autry, Designated Federal
Officer, US EPA, MC E243-05, 109 T. W. Alexander Drive, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709, or emailed to autry.lara@epa.gov and should be
received by April 13, 2012 for October 2012 appointment. To be
considered, all nomination packages should include:
Current contact information for the nominee, including the
nominee's name, organization (and position within that organization),
current business
[[Page 15105]]
address, email address, and daytime telephone number.
A brief statement describing the nominee's interest in
serving on the ELAB.
A resume describing the professional and educational
qualifications of the nominee, including a list of relevant activities,
and any current or previous service on advisory committees.
Letter(s) of recommendation from a third party supporting
the nomination.
For further questions regarding this notice, please contact Lara P.
Autry on (919) 541-5544 or autry.lara@epa.gov.
Dated: March 7, 2012.
Lek Kadeli,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-6178 Filed 3-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P