Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, 14997-15003 [2012-6177]
Download as PDF
14997
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 50
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
5 CFR Part 7501
[Docket No. FR–5542–P–01]
RIN 2501–AD55
Supplemental Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD), with
the concurrence of the Office of
Government Ethics (OGE), seeks
comments on the proposed amendments
to HUD’s Supplemental Standards of
Ethical Conduct, which are regulations
for HUD officers and employees that
supplement the Standards of Ethical
Conduct for Employees of the Executive
Branch (Standards) issued by OGE. To
ensure a comprehensive and effective
ethics program at HUD, and to address
ethical issues unique to HUD, the
proposed rule reflects statutory changes
that were enacted subsequent to the
promulgation of HUD’s Supplemental
Standards of Conduct regulation in
1996; significantly, the transfer of
general regulatory authority over the
Federal National Mortgage Association
and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation from HUD to the Federal
Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). In
addition, the proposed rule revises
definitions used in HUD’s Supplemental
Standards of Conduct to reflect updated
titles and positions and clarifies existing
prohibitions on certain financial
interests and outside employment to
better guide employee conduct, while
upholding the integrity of HUD in the
administration of its programs.
DATES: Comment Due Date: May 14,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
this proposed rule. All comments must
be in writing and be addressed to the
Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 7th St. SW.,
Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410–
0500. There are two methods for
submitting public comments. All
submissions must refer to the above
docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail.
Comments may be submitted by mail to
the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
2. Electronic Submission of
Comments. Interested persons may
submit comments electronically through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
make them immediately available to the
public. Comments submitted
electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be
viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public
comments, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above. Again, all submissions must refer to
the docket number and title of the rule.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile
(FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications
submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the above
address. Due to security measures at the
HUD Headquarters building, an advance
appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled by calling
the Regulations Division at 202–402–
3055 (this is not a toll-free number).
Individuals with speech or hearing
impairments may access this number
via TTY by calling the Federal Relay
Service, toll-free, at 800–877–8339.
Copies of all comments submitted are
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert H. Golden, Assistant General
Counsel, Ethics Law Division, telephone
number 202–402–6334, or Peter J.
Constantine, Associate General Counsel
for Ethics and Personnel Law, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410,
telephone number 202–402–2377.
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Executive Order 12674, as amended
by Executive Order 12731, authorized
OGE to establish a single,
comprehensive, and clear set of
executive-branch standards of conduct.
On August 7, 1992, OGE published the
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch
(Standards), as codified at 5 CFR part
2635. (See 57 FR 35006, as corrected at
57 FR 48557 and 57 FR 52583.) The
Standards, effective February 3, 1993,
set uniform ethical conduct standards
applicable to all executive branch
personnel.
With the concurrence of OGE, 5 CFR
2635.105 authorizes executive branch
agencies to publish agency-specific
supplemental regulations necessary to
implement their respective ethics
programs. Pursuant to this authority,
HUD, with OGE’s concurrence,
published on July 9, 1996, a final rule
to establish its supplementary standards
of ethical conduct for HUD employees
(61 FR 36246). HUD, with OGE’s
concurrence, now proposes to amend its
supplemental standards in order to
successfully implement HUD’s ethics
program in light of recent statutory
changes to HUD’s programs and
operations. One of the most significant
statutory changes to HUD programs and
operations was made by the Housing
and Economic Recovery Act of 2008
(HERA) (Pub. L. 110–289, approved July
30, 2008). HERA transfers regulatory
authority over the Federal National
Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and
the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (Freddie Mac) (collectively
referred to as the Government
Sponsored Enterprises, or GSEs) from
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
14998
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules
HUD to the Federal Housing Finance
Agency (FHFA). Based on this transfer
of regulatory authority, HUD has
decided to remove provisions of its
Supplemental Standards of Conduct
that prohibit all HUD employees from
owning certain financial interests issued
by the GSEs. In addition, HUD has
decided to remove § 7501.106 of its
Supplemental Standards of Conduct
that apply to employees whose duties
involve the regulation or oversight of
the GSEs. Section 7501.106 prohibits
covered employees from, among other
things, owning financial interests in
certain mortgage institutions and from
performing any work, either
compensated or uncompensated, for or
on behalf of a mortgage institution. The
removal of § 7501.106 is based on
HUD’s determination that this section is
no longer necessary to ensuring the
impartiality and integrity in the
administration of HUD’s programs.
In addition, this proposed rule revises
definitions used in HUD’s Supplemental
Standards of Conduct to reflect updated
titles and positions and clarifies existing
prohibitions on certain financial
interests and outside employment to
better guide employee conduct, while
upholding the integrity of HUD in the
administration of its programs. This rule
also proposes to add a new § 7501.106
that clarifies the authority of the HUD
OIG in the agency’s ethics program and
establishes it as a separate component as
provided by 5 CFR 2635.203(a).
II. Amendments Proposed by This Rule
The following is a section-by-section
overview of the amendments proposed
by this rule.
pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 7501.101 Purpose
This section remains unchanged.
Section 7501.102 Definitions
Proposed § 7501.102 updates and
clarifies key terms already in the current
regulation. In addition, it adds new
terms to reflect current HUD policy and
removes terms that are no longer used
in the regulation. Specifically, the
proposed definitions of ‘‘Agency
designee’’ and ‘‘Designated Agency
Ethics Official (DAEO)’’ are revised to
reflect updated office names and titles
within the current HUD organization.
Definitions of ‘‘Bureau,’’ ‘‘Bureau Ethics
Counselor,’’ and ‘‘Deputy Bureau Ethics
Counselor,’’ are proposed to clarify the
Office of Inspector General’s
responsibilities in HUD’s ethics
program. Additionally, the reference to
the Inspector General (IG) is removed
from the definition of ‘‘agency
designee’’ in favor of adding definitions
for ‘‘Bureau,’’ ‘‘Bureau Ethics
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
Counselor,’’ and ‘‘Deputy Bureau Ethics
Counselor.’’ ‘‘Bureau’’ would be defined
to mean the Office of the Inspector
General (OIG). ‘‘Bureau Ethics
Counselor’’ and ‘‘Deputy Bureau Ethics
Counselor’’ would be defined to mean,
respectively, the General Counsel for
OIG and the OIG employees to whom
the OIG General Counsel delegates
responsibility to make determinations,
issue explanatory guidance, or establish
procedures necessary to implement this
part, subpart I of 5 CFR part 2634, and
5 CFR part 2635 for Bureau employees.
HUD is proposing these amendments to
make the structure of its ethics program
more consistent with the structure used
by other federal agencies and to more
clearly describe the role and
responsibilities of the IG in HUD’s
ethics program.
The proposed definition of
‘‘employment’’ is also clarified to
provide that employment includes
uncompensated activity, such as
volunteer work for others while offduty.
The terms ‘‘assistance’’ and ‘‘security’’
are proposed to be removed from
§ 7501.102, because these terms are no
longer used in HUD’s supplemental
regulations.
Section 7501.103 Waivers
Proposed § 7501.103 clarifies the
procedure for requesting a waiver, and
makes other minor changes to make the
section clearer. Proposed § 7501.103
adds the requirement that a waiver
request be submitted in writing to an
agency designee and should include the
employee’s office and division; a
description of the employee’s official
duties; the nature and extent of the
waiver; a detailed statement of facts to
support the request; and the basis for
the request, such as hardship. This
amendment codifies HUD practice that
a waiver request must be in writing, and
provides direction to employees on
what should be included in a waiver
request for a thorough analysis to be
conducted. The amendment further
confirms HUD practice that hardship
and other exigent circumstances are
legitimate reasons for a waiver request,
and such a request will be considered in
light of HUD’s need to ensure public
confidence in the impartiality and
objectivity with which HUD programs
are administered. This section also
proposes to delegate authority to the
Bureau Ethics Counselor to waive
provisions of this part.
The proposed section also makes
minor textual changes in order to make
the regulation easier to understand.
These textual changes are not intended
to change the meaning of the section.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 7501.104
Interests
Prohibited Financial
Proposed § 7501.104 is amended to
remove the reference to covered
employees under § 7501.106(b)(1). This
change reflects the proposed removal of
§ 7501.106 as discussed in more detail
below in this preamble. The proposed
regulation continues to apply to all HUD
employees, except special government
employees, and to the employee’s
spouse and minor children, because
HUD has determined that ownership of
the financial interests listed in this
section by these individuals constitutes
a significant risk of an apparent conflict
of interest. Additionally, this section is
revised to reflect the changes to HUD
regulatory authority as the result of
HERA, which transferred all general
regulatory authority over Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac from HUD to the
FHFA.
Existing § 7501.104(a)(1) is proposed
to be removed. The prohibition in this
section was promulgated in 1968 after
Congress provided HUD with general
regulatory authority over Fannie Mae
through the Federal National Mortgage
Association Charter Act (12 U.S.C. 1716
et seq.). Under this 1968 statute, HUD
was directed to establish housing goals
for Fannie Mae, specifically a goal for
low- and moderate-income housing and
a goal for housing located in central
cities. Beginning in 1968, HUD’s
Standards of Conduct prohibited
employees from owning securities
issued by Fannie Mae or securities
collateralized by Fannie Mae securities.
(See 24 CFR 0.735.205(a)(3) (1968).)
Section 7501.104(a)(1) is no longer
necessary since HERA transferred the
general regulatory functions over Fannie
Mae to FHFA.
Existing § 7501.104(a)(2) is also
proposed to be removed. In 1989,
Congress passed the Financial
Institutions Reform, Recovery, and
Enforcement Act (FIRREA) and granted
HUD essentially the same authority over
Freddie Mac as it had over Fannie Mae.
In response to this additional authority,
HUD’s standards of conduct were
updated to include a prohibition against
owning securities issued by Freddie
Mac or securities collateralized by
Freddie Mac securities. HUD has
determined that the prohibition is no
longer necessary because of HERA.
The remaining provisions are
redesignated accordingly.
Proposed § 7501.104(a)(1) adopts
language from the current
§ 7501.104(a)(3).
Proposed § 7501.104(a)(2) is based on
current § 7501.104(a)(4), but is revised
to add clarity. Specifically, the revised
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules
section replaces the phrase ‘‘in a
multifamily project or single family
dwelling, cooperative unit, or
condominium unit’’ with the term
‘‘project’’ in order to cover all HUD
subsidized or insured projects that exist
or may come to exist in the future.
Employee ownership of homes with
mortgages insured under programs of
the Federal Housing Administration
(FHA) and the purchase by employees
of HUD-owned homes, which was an
exception within the prohibition of
§ 7501.104(a)(4), is now addressed in
exceptions under proposed
§ 7501.104(b). All remaining HUD
projects, including multifamily projects,
assisted living facilities, nursing homes,
and hospitals, are now included in the
revised prohibition in § 7501.104(a)(2).
Finally, proposed § 7501.104(a)(2) now
uses the term ‘‘financial interest’’ to
replace ‘‘stock or other financial
interest’’ and references OGE
regulations at 5 CFR 2635.403(c) for a
complete definition of the term
‘‘financial interest,’’ including
examples.
Proposed § 7501.104(a)(3) revises the
language in current § 7501.104(a)(5). A
new exception is proposed that allows
all new HUD employees who already
have a tenant receiving Section 8
subsidies to retain that tenant until the
tenant terminates his or her lease.
Proposed § 7501.104(a)(3)(i)(E) adds a
new exception permitting HUD
employees to receive a Section 8
subsidy for the rental of properties
located in areas of Presidentially
declared emergency or natural disaster
with prior written approval from an
agency designee. HUD’s experience
demonstrates that in rare instances (e.g.,
Hurricane Katrina in 2005 or the 2008
flooding in Cedar Rapids, Iowa), there
may be an extreme shortage of
affordable housing in an area due to a
natural disaster or other emergency.
This exception would permit HUD
employees with rentable properties in
these areas to accept new tenants
receiving Section 8 subsidies. These
supplemental ethics regulations are
intended to uphold the integrity of
HUD’s administration of the Section 8
program and are not intended to further
restrict the availability of Section 8
housing, especially in times of acute
housing shortages.
The exceptions provided by proposed
§ 7501.104(a)(3) continue as long as the
tenant continues to reside in the
property and as long as the rent charged
the tenant is not increased above the
annual rate adjustments permitted by
the Section 8 program. This first
condition codifies HUD’s intent not to
require an employee to terminate the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
rental arrangement early or require a
Section 8 tenant to move based solely
on these regulations. The second
condition preserves the current
language of the exceptions.
Current § 7501.104(a)(6) is proposed
to be removed. The current prohibition
against ‘‘direct creditor interests’’ is
undefined and unclear.
Proposed § 7501.104(b), which
provides exceptions to this section on
prohibited financial interests, is revised
to add the phrase ‘‘directly or indirectly
receiving, acquiring or owning’’ to
ensure consistency with § 7501.104(a).
Additionally, this section proposes to
expand the exceptions by eliminating
from current § 7501.104(b)(1) the
prohibition on owning investment funds
that concentrate in residential mortgages
or mortgage-backed securities. This
prohibition is no longer needed to
maintain the integrity of HUD in light of
the fact that HUD no longer has
regulatory authority over Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac.
Proposed § 7501.104(b)(1) also
provides an exception to the interests
prohibited under proposed
§ 7501.104(a)(2). Section 7501.104(b)(1)
allows the employee, or the employee’s
spouse or minor child, to have a
financial interest in a publicly available
or publicly traded investment fund that
may include interests that are
prohibited under § 7501.104(a)(2), as
long as the employee, or the employee’s
spouse or minor child, neither exercises
control nor has the ability to exercise
control over the fund or the financial
interests held in the fund. This
exception allows the employee, or the
employee’s spouse or minor child, to
have an interest in an investment fund
that may hold interests in HUD
subsidized projects. HUD’s experience
has been that it is extremely difficult to
determine which investment funds have
interests in HUD-subsidized projects,
since that information is not readily
available. Therefore, HUD has decided
that this type of interest does not
present an appearance problem and is
therefore permissible.
Current § 7501.104(b)(2) is proposed
to be removed. Read literally, this
exception had no possible application to
a limited partnership holding. Also,
limited partnerships create no less of an
appearance issue than other legal
entities that could be used as an
investment vehicle and do not warrant
the specific exception.
Proposed § 7501.104(b)(2) provides
that a HUD employee may obtain
mortgage insurance provided by FHA
under section 203 of the National
Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709) to assist
in his or her purchase of a single-family
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14999
home that serves as the employee’s
principal residence and of one other
single-family residence. Proposed
§ 7501.104(b)(2) provides notice to HUD
employees that they must adhere to the
procedures established by the Assistant
Secretary for Housing–FHA
Commissioner in order to obtain FHA
insurance. This exception was
previously found in § 7501.104(b)(3).
Proposed § 7501.104(b)(3) covers HUD
employees’ purchases of HUD-owned
homes. This provision is currently an
exception within the prohibition of
§ 7501.104(a)(4); however, since the
provision is permissive, HUD has
moved the exception to proposed
§ 7501.104(b), where the other
exceptions to the prohibitions to
§ 7501.104(a) are located. Current
§ 7501.104(a)(4) notifies employees that
the purchase of HUD-held properties
must be consistent with an Office of
Housing handbook that is now outdated.
To avoid the codification of references
to HUD handbooks that may become
obsolete, and thus create a discrepancy
with the supplemental standards,
proposed § 7501.104(b)(3) does not
reference a specific Office of Housing
handbook, but simply provides notice to
HUD employees that they must adhere
to the procedures established by the
Assistant Secretary for Housing—FHA
Commissioner in order to purchase a
HUD-held property.
Proposed § 7501.104(b)(4) has been
added to ensure that the employment
compensation and benefits package for
an employee’s spouse is not covered as
a prohibited financial interest if the
employee’s spouse is employed by an
entity that may have interests in HUD
projects that are prohibited under
proposed § 7501.104(a)(2). For example,
an employee’s spouse is not restricted
from earning a salary and other benefits
as compensation for employment with a
real estate development company that
does multifamily business with HUD.
Proposed § 7501.104(b)(5) contains a
revised provision that permits
employees, or their spouses or minor
children, to hold Government National
Mortgage Association (GNMA)
securities. The ownership of GNMA
securities is currently addressed in
§ 7501.104(b)(1). Under this provision,
an employee or the spouse or minor
child of an employee may not own an
interest in an investment fund that has
an objective or practice of investing in
residential mortgages or securities
backed by residential mortgages except
those of GNMA. Since HUD is
proposing to revise § 7501.104(b)(1), the
provision addressing ownership of
GNMA securities is established as a
separate exception.
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
15000
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Section 7501.105 Outside Activities
Proposed § 7501.105 governs the
outside activities of HUD employees.
This proposed section has been revised
to account for changes in HUD’s
regulatory authority and to provide
clarity on restricted real estate activities.
The proposed rule is designed to
balance several important ethical
principles against an employee’s right to
engage in outside activities.
HUD has determined that maintaining
the policy against employment in
businesses related to real estate or
manufactured housing is necessary to
protect against questions regarding the
impartiality and objectivity of
employees in the administration of HUD
programs. Allowing such activity would
hinder HUD in meeting its missions if
members of the public question whether
HUD employees are using their public
positions or HUD connections to
advance their outside real estate-related
employment. While HUD has
determined that this concern remains
valid, HUD has also concluded that
implementing this rule in its current
form has led to inconsistent application
and confusion. Therefore, HUD is
proposing a number of amendments to
clarify the intent of the prohibition.
Proposed § 7501.105(a)(1) is amended
by removing the phrase ‘‘involving
active participation’’ with a real estaterelated business. By removing this term,
HUD does not intend to change the
application of the prohibition contained
in § 7501.105(a)(1) of the current rule;
rather, HUD intends to make the
prohibition less confusing and more
transparent. The term ‘‘involving active
participation’’ with a real estate-related
business encompasses two prohibitions.
First, it prohibits employment with a
real estate-related business and, second,
it prohibits ownership of a real estaterelated business. The term led to some
confusion in the application of these
prohibitions by conflating the concepts
of employment in a business related to
real estate and the ownership activities
of operating or managing investment
properties. To rectify any confusion,
HUD has separated the prohibition
against the ownership activities of
operating and managing a real estaterelated business involving investment
properties from the employment
prohibition, by adding § 7501.105(a)(2),
which prohibits the operation or
management of investment properties to
the extent that doing so rises to the level
of a real estate business. To make the
prohibition more transparent, HUD has
decided to codify longstanding policy
by listing several factors that it uses to
consider whether the employee’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
actions of operating or managing
investment properties rises to the level
of a real estate business and falls within
the prohibition. HUD first announced
these factors in the 1995 preamble to the
proposed version of the current rule. By
listing these factors in the rule, HUD has
not changed the scope of the current
prohibition; rather, it has made the
prohibition more transparent by
including in the rule the factors that are
used to determine a violation of the
prohibition. Therefore, HUD employees
may continue to own or manage
investment properties, so long as that
ownership or management does not rise
to the level of operation or management
of a real estate-related business. In a
further effort to make the rule more
transparent, HUD has decided to codify
existing policy by stating in
§ 7501.105(a)(2) that HUD will consider
these situations on an individual basis.
Proposed § 7501.105(a)(3) is amended
to prohibit outside employment with a
registered lobbying organization that is
registered to lobby HUD. The current
regulation cites a repealed statute. The
proposed change would incorporate the
definition of a lobbyist under the
Lobbying Disclosure Act (2 U.S.C. 1601,
et seq.), although applying only to
entities that lobby HUD. This change
will allow easier compliance by
employees and review by ethics staff
because of the ease of checking the
lobbying database of the U.S. House of
Representatives and the U.S. Senate to
determine if a potential employer is
prohibited.
Proposed § 7501.105(a)(4) is amended
to remove the specific restriction on
employees having outside positions
with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As
previously discussed, HUD no longer
has general regulatory authority over
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Further,
under proposed § 7501.105(a)(1),
employees would be prohibited from
employment with a business related to
real estate. This prohibition would
cover employment with Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. Therefore, a specific
prohibition is not necessary.
Proposed § 7501.105(b)(1)(ii) is
amended to clarify that the outside
employment prohibitions do not
prohibit employees from serving as a
member of an employee’s homeowners’
association. HUD previously permitted
serving on the board of a cooperative
and condominium association, and
HUD has determined that serving on the
board of a homeowners’ association
does not create additional ethics
concerns.
HUD has added § 7501.105(b)(2),
which codifies HUD’s longstanding
policy that employees with a real estate
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
agent’s license may continue to hold
such license. An employee may only
use his or her license in relation to
purchasing or selling a single-family
property for use as the employee’s
primary residence, or for the primary
residence of an immediate family of the
employee. Employees seeking to use
their real estate license for this purpose,
however, must obtain the prior written
approval of an agency ethics official.
HUD has revised § 7501.105(c) to add
the requirement for prior written
approval from an agency ethics official
for employees seeking to use their real
estate license for this purpose.
Proposed § 7501.105(c)(1) would
require an employee to receive written
approval prior to accepting a position of
authority with a prohibited source. This
section had previously extended only to
organizations that directly or indirectly
received HUD assistance. This section
has been expanded to include all
prohibited sources, because HUD has
determined that taking a position of
authority with any prohibited source,
not just those which receive HUD
funding, could create the appearance of
a conflict of interest and should
therefore be examined by an agency
ethics official. Further, the section will
now be easier for employees to
understand, because prohibited source
is a term with which they are familiar.
As discussed, HUD proposes to add the
requirement at § 7501.105(c)(1)(iv) for
prior written approval from an agency
ethics official for employees seeking to
use their real estate license in relation
to purchasing or selling a single-family
property for use as the employee’s
primary residence or as the primary
residence of an immediate family
member of the employee.
Proposed § 7501.105 would eliminate
the reference to voluntary services. That
section cited only other regulations, and
HUD has determined that it is no longer
needed to ensure public confidence in
the impartiality and objectivity with
which HUD programs are administered.
Proposed § 7501.105(d) incorporates
HUD’s policy regarding liaison
representatives, which was previously
provided as a Note. This change will
avoid any confusion over the concept
and its authority.
Section 7501.106 Bureau Instructions
and Designation of Separate Agency
Components
HUD proposes to remove this section
as currently codified. As previously
discussed in this preamble, HUD no
longer has general regulatory authority
over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In its
place, HUD is proposing to add a new
§ 7501.106 that clarifies the authority of
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules
the Office of the Inspector General in
the agency’s ethics program and
establishes it as a separate component as
provided for by 5 CFR 2635.203(a).
In 1992, Congress enacted the Federal
Housing Enterprise Financial Safety and
Soundness Act (FHEFSSA) (12 U.S.C.
4501 et seq.), which revamped the
statutory requirements and regulatory
structure of the GSEs by separating the
GSEs’ financial regulation from its
mission regulation. FHEFSSA also
established the Office of Federal
Housing Enterprise Oversight as an
independent regulatory office within
HUD to ensure the GSEs’ financial
safety and soundness, while the
Secretary of HUD retained responsibility
for the mission regulation and all other
general regulatory powers. FHEFSSA
also required HUD to prohibit the GSEs
from discriminating in their mortgage
purchases. The fair housing authority
was twofold: first, to take remedial
action against lenders found to have
engaged in discriminatory lending
practices and second, to periodically
review and comment on the GSEs’
underwriting and appraisal guidelines
to ensure consistency with the Fair
Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.). In
2008, HERA transferred all regulatory
oversight of the GSEs from HUD to
FHFA, except for this fair housing
component.
HUD’s only remaining direct
regulation of the GSEs is the periodic
review of their underwriting and
appraisal guidelines by the Office of
Systemic Investigation of HUD’s Office
of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
and by the Fair Housing Enforcement
Division of HUD’s Office of General
Counsel. For employees involved in
these compliance reviews, 18 U.S.C.
208, which prohibits employees from
participating in matters that may affect
their financial interests, would prohibit
them from participating in official
matters such as these reviews if the
employee also owns a financial interest
that could be affected by the review.
Therefore, these employees would be
required to recuse themselves from the
official matter or divest their financial
interest without the need for an
additional HUD-specific regulation. The
criminal statute is sufficient to insure
against conflicts in those HUD
employees when the periodic review is
underway.
HUD has determined that the
prohibitions in the current § 7501.106
are unnecessary given HUD’s very
limited role regarding the GSEs. The
current § 7501.106 prohibits certain
employees that were involved with
GSEs from owning securities in certain
mortgage institutions that originate,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
15001
insure, or service mortgages owned or
guaranteed by the GSEs. However, HUD
employees no longer regulate the GSEs
in a way that could affect the stock
value of these mortgage institutions.
Additionally, there are other
regulations that cover an appearance
issue that might arise for those
employees working on fair housing
compliance review of the GSEs.
Specifically, OGE regulations at 5 CFR
2635.502 would apply and would limit
the activity that employees who are
involved in the periodic review of the
GSEs can engage in with respect to a
financial interest in a mortgage
institution that currently originates,
insures, or services mortgages owned or
guaranteed by the GSEs.
Accordingly removing these
prohibitions would not compromise the
integrity of HUD’s functions.
The new proposed § 7501.106(a)
delegates to the Bureau Ethics
Counselor the authority to designate
Deputy Bureau Ethics Counselors to
make determinations, issue explanatory
guidance, and establish procedures
necessary to implement this part,
subpart I of 5 CFR 2634, and 5 CFR part
2635 for his or her bureau. The
proposed rule also includes the
concurrence of the Designated Agency
Ethics Official on the delegation. This
designation is consistent with 5 CFR
2635.105(c), more clearly describes the
role and responsibility of the OIG in the
agency’s ethics program, and maintains
the independence of the IG as provided
for by the Inspector General Act, as
amended.
Additionally, consistent with 5 CFR
2635.203(a), new proposed
§ 7501.106(b) designates the OIG as a
separate agency component. HUD is
designating the OIG as a separate agency
component to make the structure of its
ethics program more consistent with the
structure used by other federal agencies.
HUD’s changes are intended to more
clearly describe the role and
responsibility of the OIG in the agency’s
ethics program, and maintain the
independence and authority of the IG.
The designation as a separate agency
component authorizes Bureau Ethics
Counselors within the OIG to render
legal ethics advice regarding the
regulations contained in subpart B of
5 CFR part 2635, governing gifts from
outside sources; and 5 CFR 2635.807,
governing teaching, speaking, or
writing.
proposed amendatory rulemaking, to be
received by DATES section of this
proposed rule. The comments will be
carefully considered and appropriate
changes will be made before a final rule
is adopted and published in the Federal
Register.
III. Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits, to the extent
practicable and permitted by law, an
agency from promulgating a regulation
Administrative Procedure Act
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments on this
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if the regulation is
necessary, to select the regulatory
approach that maximizes net benefits.
Because this rule relates solely to the
internal operations of HUD, this rule
was determined to be not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and therefore was
not reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires
an agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because this rule pertains only
to HUD employees.
Information Collection Requirements
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) does not apply to
this regulation because it does not
contain information collection
requirements subject to the approval of
OMB.
Environmental Impact
In accordance with 40 CFR 1508.4 of
the regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality and 24 CFR
50.20(k) of the HUD regulations, the
policies and procedures contained in
this rule relate only to internal
administrative procedures whose
content does not constitute a
development decision nor affect the
physical condition of project areas or
building sites, and therefore, are
categorically excluded from the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act.
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
15002
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules
that has federalism implications and
either imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by
statute or preempts state law, unless the
relevant requirements of section 6 of the
Executive Order are met. This rule does
not have federalism implications and
does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive
Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements
for federal agencies to assess the effects
of their regulatory actions on state,
local, and tribal governments, and on
the private sector. Since it is only
directed toward HUD employees, this
rule would not impose any federal
mandates on any state, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector,
within the meaning of the UMRA
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 7501
Conflicts of interests.
Accordingly, for the reasons described
in the preamble, HUD, with the
concurrence of OGE, proposes to amend
5 CFR part 7501, as follows:
PART 7501—SUPPLEMENTAL
STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT
FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Sec.
7501.101 Purpose.
7501.102 Definitions.
7501.103 Waivers.
7501.104 Prohibited financial interests.
7501.105 Outside activities.
7501.106 Bureau instructions and
designation of separate agency
component.
pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Purpose.
In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105,
the regulations in this part apply to
employees of the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD
or Department) and supplement the
Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch
contained in 5 CFR part 2635.
Employees are required to comply with
5 CFR part 2635, this part, and any
additional rules of conduct that the
Department is authorized to issue.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
Definitions.
For purposes of this part, and
otherwise as indicated, the following
definitions shall apply:
Agency designee, as used also in 5
CFR part 2635, means the Associate
General Counsel for Ethics and
Personnel Law, the Assistant General
Counsel for the Ethics Law Division,
and the HUD Regional Counsels.
Agency ethics official, as used also in
5 CFR part 2635, means the agency
designees as specified above.
Affiliate means any entity that
controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with another entity.
Bureau means the Office of the
Inspector General.
Bureau Ethics Counselor means the
General Counsel for the Bureau.
Deputy Bureau Ethics Counselor
means the Bureau employee or
employees who the Bureau Ethics
Counselor has delegated responsibility
to act under § 7501.106 for the
Bureau.
Designated Agency Ethics Official
(DAEO) means the General Counsel of
HUD or the Deputy General Counsel for
Operations in the absence of the General
Counsel.
Employment means any compensated
or uncompensated (including volunteer
work for others while off-duty) form of
non-Federal activity or business
relationship, including selfemployment, that involves the provision
of personal services by the employee. It
includes, but is not limited to, personal
services as an officer, director,
employee, agent, attorney, consultant,
contractor, general partner, trustee,
teacher, or speaker. It includes writing
when done under an arrangement with
another person for production or
publication of the written product.
§ 7501.103
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7301, 7351, 7353;
5 U.S.C. App. (Ethics in Government Act of
1978); E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989
Comp., p. 215, as modified by E.O. 12731, 55
FR 42547, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306; 5 CFR
2635.105, 2635.203(a), 2635.403(a), 2635.803,
2635.807.
§ 7501.101
§ 7501.102
Waivers.
The Designated Agency Ethics
Official, or the Bureau Ethics Counselor
for a Bureau employee may waive any
provision of this part upon finding that
the waiver will not result in conduct
inconsistent with 5 CFR part 2635 and
is not otherwise prohibited by law and
that application of the provision is not
necessary to ensure public confidence
in the Department’s impartial and
objective administration of its programs.
Each waiver shall be in writing and
supported by a statement of the facts
and findings upon which it is based and
may impose appropriate conditions,
such as requiring the employee’s
execution of a written disqualification
statement. A waiver will be considered
only in response to a written waiver
request submitted to an agency ethics
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
official. The waiver request should
include:
(1) The requesting employee’s Branch,
Unit, and a detailed description of his
or her official duties;
(2) The nature and extent of the
proposed waiver;
(3) A detailed statement of the facts
supporting the request; and
(4) The basis for the request, such as
undue hardship or other exigent
circumstances.
§ 7501.104
Prohibited financial interests.
(a) General requirement. This section
applies to all HUD employees except
special Government employees. Except
as provided in paragraph (b) of this
section, the employee, or the employee’s
spouse or minor child, shall not directly
or indirectly receive, acquire, or own:
(1) Federal Housing Administration
(FHA) debentures or certificates of
claim.
(2) A financial interest in a project,
including any single family dwelling or
unit, which is subsidized by the
Department, or which is subject to a
note or mortgage or other security
interest insured by the Department. The
definition of ‘‘financial interest’’ is
found at 5 CFR 2635.403(c).
(3)(i) Any Department subsidy
provided pursuant to Section 8 of the
United States Housing Act of 1937, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 1437f), to or on
behalf of a tenant of property owned by
the employee or the employee’s spouse
or minor child. However, such subsidy
is permitted when:
(A) The employee, or the employee’s
spouse or minor child acquires, without
specific intent as through inheritance, a
property in which a tenant receiving
such a subsidy already resides;
(B) The tenant receiving such a
subsidy lived in the rental property
before the employee worked for the
Department;
(C) The tenant receiving such a
subsidy is a parent, child, grandchild, or
sibling of the employee;
(D) The employee’s, or the employee’s
spouse or minor child’s, rental property
has an incumbent tenant who has not
previously received such a subsidy and
becomes the beneficiary thereof; or
(E) The location of the rental property
is in a Presidentially declared
emergency or natural disaster area and
the employee receives prior written
approval from an agency designee.
(ii) The exception provided by
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section
continues only as long as:
(A) The tenant continues to reside in
the property; and
(B) There is no increase in that
tenant’s rent upon the commencement
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules
of subsidy payments other than normal
annual adjustments under the Section 8
program.
(b) Exception to prohibition for
certain interests. Nothing in this section
prohibits the employee, or the
employee’s spouse or minor child from
directly or indirectly receiving,
acquiring, or owning:
(1) A financial interest in a publicly
available or publicly traded investment
fund that includes financial interests
prohibited by paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, so long as the employee neither
exercises control nor has the ability to
exercise control over the fund or the
financial interests held in the fund;
(2) Mortgage insurance provided
pursuant to section 203 of the National
Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709) on the
employee’s principal residence and any
one other single family residence.
Employees must adhere to the
procedures established by the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—FHA
Commissioner in order to obtain FHA
insurance;
(3) Department-owned single family
property. Employees must adhere to the
procedures established by the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—FHA
Commissioner in order to purchase a
HUD-held property;
(4) Employment compensation and
benefit packages provided by the
employer of an employee’s spouse that
include financial interests prohibited by
paragraph (a)(2) of this section; or
(5) Government National Mortgage
Association (GNMA) securities.
(c) Reporting and divestiture. An
employee must report, in writing, to the
appropriate agency ethics official, any
interest prohibited under paragraph (a)
of this section acquired prior to the
commencement of employment with the
Department or without specific intent,
as through gift, inheritance, or marriage,
within 30 days from the date of the start
of employment or acquisition of such
interest. Such interest must be divested
within 90 days from the date reported
unless waived by the Designated
Agency Ethics Official in accordance
with § 7501.103.
pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 7501.105
Outside activities.
(a) Prohibited outside activities.
Subject to the exceptions set forth in
paragraph (b) of this section, HUD
employees, except special Government
employees, shall not engage in:
(1) Employment with a business
related to real estate or manufactured
housing including, but not limited to,
real estate brokerage, management and
sales, architecture, engineering,
mortgage lending, property insurance,
appraisal services, title search services,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:01 Mar 13, 2012
Jkt 226001
construction, construction financing,
land planning, or real estate
development;
(2) The operation or management of
investment properties to the extent that
it rises to the level of a real estaterelated business. HUD will determine
whether an employee is operating or
managing investment properties to an
extent that it rises to the level of a real
estate business based on the totality of
the circumstances, and will consider
whether the employee maintains an
office; advertises or otherwise solicits
clients or business; hires staff or
employees; uses business stationary or
other similar materials; files the
business as a corporation, limited
liability company, partnership, or other
type of business association with a state
government; establishes a formal or
informal association with an existing
business; hires a management company;
and the nature and number of its
investment properties;
(3) Employment with a person or
entity who registered as a lobbyist or
lobbyist organization pursuant to 2
U.S.C 1603(a) and engages in lobbying
activity concerning the Department;
(4) Employment as an officer or
director with a Department-approved
mortgagee, a lending institution, or an
organization that services securities for
the Department; or
(5) Employment with the Federal
Home Loan Bank System or any affiliate
thereof.
(b) Exceptions to employment
prohibitions. The prohibitions set forth
in paragraph (a) of this section do not
apply to:
(1) Serving as an officer or a member
of the Board of Directors of:
(i) A Federal Credit Union;
(ii) A cooperative, condominium
association, or homeowners association
for a housing project that is not subject
to regulation by the Department or, if so
regulated, in which the employee
personally resides; or
(iii) An entity designated in writing
by the Designated Agency Ethics
Official.
(2) Holding a real estate agent’s
license; however, use of the license is
limited as provided by paragraph (c) of
this section.
(c) Prior approval requirement. (1)
Employees, except special Government
employees, shall obtain the prior
written approval of an Agency Ethics
Official before accepting compensated
or uncompensated employment:
(i) As an officer, director, trustee, or
general partner of, or in any other
position of authority with a prohibited
source, as defined at 5 CFR 2635.203(d);
(ii) With a state or local government;
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15003
(iii) In the same professional field as
that of the employee’s official position;
or
(iv) As a real estate agent in relation
to purchasing or selling a single family
property for use as the employee’s
primary residence, or the primary
residence of the employee’s immediate
family member.
(2) Approval shall be granted unless
the conduct is inconsistent with 5 CFR
part 2635 or this part.
(d) Liaison representative. An
employee designated to serve in an
official capacity as the Department’s
liaison representative to an outside
organization is not engaged in an
outside activity to which this section
applies. Notwithstanding, an employee
may be designated to serve as the
Department’s liaison representative only
as authorized by law, and as approved
by the Department under applicable
procedures.
§ 7501.106 Bureau instructions and
designation of separate agency component.
(a) Bureau instructions. With the
concurrence of the Designated Agency
Ethics Official, the Bureau Ethics
Counselor is authorized, consistent with
5 CFR 2635.105(c), to designate Deputy
Bureau Ethics Counselors, to make a
determination, issue explanatory
guidance, and establish procedures
necessary to implement this part,
subpart I of 5 CFR part 2634, and 5 CFR
part 2635 for the Bureau.
(b) Designation of separate agency
component. Pursuant to 5 CFR
2635.203(a), the Office of the Inspector
General is designated as a separate
agency for purposes of the regulations
contained in subpart B of 5 CFR part
2635, governing gifts from outside
sources; and 5 CFR 2635.807, governing
teaching, speaking, or writing.
Dated: February 15, 2012.
Don W. Fox,
Principal Deputy Director, Office of
Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2012–6177 Filed 3–13–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–109369–10]
RIN 1545–BJ33
Passive Activity Losses and Credits
Limited; Hearing
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14997-15003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6177]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 14997]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
5 CFR Part 7501
[Docket No. FR-5542-P-01]
RIN 2501-AD55
Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Department of Housing and Urban Development
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), with
the concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), seeks
comments on the proposed amendments to HUD's Supplemental Standards of
Ethical Conduct, which are regulations for HUD officers and employees
that supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Executive Branch (Standards) issued by OGE. To ensure a comprehensive
and effective ethics program at HUD, and to address ethical issues
unique to HUD, the proposed rule reflects statutory changes that were
enacted subsequent to the promulgation of HUD's Supplemental Standards
of Conduct regulation in 1996; significantly, the transfer of general
regulatory authority over the Federal National Mortgage Association and
the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation from HUD to the Federal
Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). In addition, the proposed rule revises
definitions used in HUD's Supplemental Standards of Conduct to reflect
updated titles and positions and clarifies existing prohibitions on
certain financial interests and outside employment to better guide
employee conduct, while upholding the integrity of HUD in the
administration of its programs.
DATES: Comment Due Date: May 14, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule. All comments must be in writing and be addressed to
the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th St. SW., Room 10276, Washington,
DC 20410-0500. There are two methods for submitting public comments.
All submissions must refer to the above docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by
mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410-0500.
2. Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to
the public. Comments submitted electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments must
be submitted through one of the two methods specified above. Again,
all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of the
rule.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays at the
above address. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters
building, an advance appointment to review the public comments must be
scheduled by calling the Regulations Division at 202-402-3055 (this is
not a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or hearing impairments
may access this number via TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service,
toll-free, at 800-877-8339. Copies of all comments submitted are
available for inspection and downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert H. Golden, Assistant General
Counsel, Ethics Law Division, telephone number 202-402-6334, or Peter
J. Constantine, Associate General Counsel for Ethics and Personnel Law,
Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development,
451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410, telephone number 202-402-
2377. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at 800-877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Executive Order 12674, as amended by Executive Order 12731,
authorized OGE to establish a single, comprehensive, and clear set of
executive-branch standards of conduct. On August 7, 1992, OGE published
the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch
(Standards), as codified at 5 CFR part 2635. (See 57 FR 35006, as
corrected at 57 FR 48557 and 57 FR 52583.) The Standards, effective
February 3, 1993, set uniform ethical conduct standards applicable to
all executive branch personnel.
With the concurrence of OGE, 5 CFR 2635.105 authorizes executive
branch agencies to publish agency-specific supplemental regulations
necessary to implement their respective ethics programs. Pursuant to
this authority, HUD, with OGE's concurrence, published on July 9, 1996,
a final rule to establish its supplementary standards of ethical
conduct for HUD employees (61 FR 36246). HUD, with OGE's concurrence,
now proposes to amend its supplemental standards in order to
successfully implement HUD's ethics program in light of recent
statutory changes to HUD's programs and operations. One of the most
significant statutory changes to HUD programs and operations was made
by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) (Pub. L. 110-
289, approved July 30, 2008). HERA transfers regulatory authority over
the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) (collectively referred to
as the Government Sponsored Enterprises, or GSEs) from
[[Page 14998]]
HUD to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). Based on this
transfer of regulatory authority, HUD has decided to remove provisions
of its Supplemental Standards of Conduct that prohibit all HUD
employees from owning certain financial interests issued by the GSEs.
In addition, HUD has decided to remove Sec. 7501.106 of its
Supplemental Standards of Conduct that apply to employees whose duties
involve the regulation or oversight of the GSEs. Section 7501.106
prohibits covered employees from, among other things, owning financial
interests in certain mortgage institutions and from performing any
work, either compensated or uncompensated, for or on behalf of a
mortgage institution. The removal of Sec. 7501.106 is based on HUD's
determination that this section is no longer necessary to ensuring the
impartiality and integrity in the administration of HUD's programs.
In addition, this proposed rule revises definitions used in HUD's
Supplemental Standards of Conduct to reflect updated titles and
positions and clarifies existing prohibitions on certain financial
interests and outside employment to better guide employee conduct,
while upholding the integrity of HUD in the administration of its
programs. This rule also proposes to add a new Sec. 7501.106 that
clarifies the authority of the HUD OIG in the agency's ethics program
and establishes it as a separate component as provided by 5 CFR
2635.203(a).
II. Amendments Proposed by This Rule
The following is a section-by-section overview of the amendments
proposed by this rule.
Section 7501.101 Purpose
This section remains unchanged.
Section 7501.102 Definitions
Proposed Sec. 7501.102 updates and clarifies key terms already in
the current regulation. In addition, it adds new terms to reflect
current HUD policy and removes terms that are no longer used in the
regulation. Specifically, the proposed definitions of ``Agency
designee'' and ``Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO)'' are revised
to reflect updated office names and titles within the current HUD
organization. Definitions of ``Bureau,'' ``Bureau Ethics Counselor,''
and ``Deputy Bureau Ethics Counselor,'' are proposed to clarify the
Office of Inspector General's responsibilities in HUD's ethics program.
Additionally, the reference to the Inspector General (IG) is removed
from the definition of ``agency designee'' in favor of adding
definitions for ``Bureau,'' ``Bureau Ethics Counselor,'' and ``Deputy
Bureau Ethics Counselor.'' ``Bureau'' would be defined to mean the
Office of the Inspector General (OIG). ``Bureau Ethics Counselor'' and
``Deputy Bureau Ethics Counselor'' would be defined to mean,
respectively, the General Counsel for OIG and the OIG employees to whom
the OIG General Counsel delegates responsibility to make
determinations, issue explanatory guidance, or establish procedures
necessary to implement this part, subpart I of 5 CFR part 2634, and 5
CFR part 2635 for Bureau employees. HUD is proposing these amendments
to make the structure of its ethics program more consistent with the
structure used by other federal agencies and to more clearly describe
the role and responsibilities of the IG in HUD's ethics program.
The proposed definition of ``employment'' is also clarified to
provide that employment includes uncompensated activity, such as
volunteer work for others while off-duty.
The terms ``assistance'' and ``security'' are proposed to be
removed from Sec. 7501.102, because these terms are no longer used in
HUD's supplemental regulations.
Section 7501.103 Waivers
Proposed Sec. 7501.103 clarifies the procedure for requesting a
waiver, and makes other minor changes to make the section clearer.
Proposed Sec. 7501.103 adds the requirement that a waiver request be
submitted in writing to an agency designee and should include the
employee's office and division; a description of the employee's
official duties; the nature and extent of the waiver; a detailed
statement of facts to support the request; and the basis for the
request, such as hardship. This amendment codifies HUD practice that a
waiver request must be in writing, and provides direction to employees
on what should be included in a waiver request for a thorough analysis
to be conducted. The amendment further confirms HUD practice that
hardship and other exigent circumstances are legitimate reasons for a
waiver request, and such a request will be considered in light of HUD's
need to ensure public confidence in the impartiality and objectivity
with which HUD programs are administered. This section also proposes to
delegate authority to the Bureau Ethics Counselor to waive provisions
of this part.
The proposed section also makes minor textual changes in order to
make the regulation easier to understand. These textual changes are not
intended to change the meaning of the section.
Section 7501.104 Prohibited Financial Interests
Proposed Sec. 7501.104 is amended to remove the reference to
covered employees under Sec. 7501.106(b)(1). This change reflects the
proposed removal of Sec. 7501.106 as discussed in more detail below in
this preamble. The proposed regulation continues to apply to all HUD
employees, except special government employees, and to the employee's
spouse and minor children, because HUD has determined that ownership of
the financial interests listed in this section by these individuals
constitutes a significant risk of an apparent conflict of interest.
Additionally, this section is revised to reflect the changes to HUD
regulatory authority as the result of HERA, which transferred all
general regulatory authority over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from HUD
to the FHFA.
Existing Sec. 7501.104(a)(1) is proposed to be removed. The
prohibition in this section was promulgated in 1968 after Congress
provided HUD with general regulatory authority over Fannie Mae through
the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act (12 U.S.C. 1716
et seq.). Under this 1968 statute, HUD was directed to establish
housing goals for Fannie Mae, specifically a goal for low- and
moderate-income housing and a goal for housing located in central
cities. Beginning in 1968, HUD's Standards of Conduct prohibited
employees from owning securities issued by Fannie Mae or securities
collateralized by Fannie Mae securities. (See 24 CFR 0.735.205(a)(3)
(1968).) Section 7501.104(a)(1) is no longer necessary since HERA
transferred the general regulatory functions over Fannie Mae to FHFA.
Existing Sec. 7501.104(a)(2) is also proposed to be removed. In
1989, Congress passed the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and
Enforcement Act (FIRREA) and granted HUD essentially the same authority
over Freddie Mac as it had over Fannie Mae. In response to this
additional authority, HUD's standards of conduct were updated to
include a prohibition against owning securities issued by Freddie Mac
or securities collateralized by Freddie Mac securities. HUD has
determined that the prohibition is no longer necessary because of HERA.
The remaining provisions are redesignated accordingly.
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(a)(1) adopts language from the current
Sec. 7501.104(a)(3).
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(a)(2) is based on current Sec.
7501.104(a)(4), but is revised to add clarity. Specifically, the
revised
[[Page 14999]]
section replaces the phrase ``in a multifamily project or single family
dwelling, cooperative unit, or condominium unit'' with the term
``project'' in order to cover all HUD subsidized or insured projects
that exist or may come to exist in the future. Employee ownership of
homes with mortgages insured under programs of the Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) and the purchase by employees of HUD-owned homes,
which was an exception within the prohibition of Sec. 7501.104(a)(4),
is now addressed in exceptions under proposed Sec. 7501.104(b). All
remaining HUD projects, including multifamily projects, assisted living
facilities, nursing homes, and hospitals, are now included in the
revised prohibition in Sec. 7501.104(a)(2). Finally, proposed Sec.
7501.104(a)(2) now uses the term ``financial interest'' to replace
``stock or other financial interest'' and references OGE regulations at
5 CFR 2635.403(c) for a complete definition of the term ``financial
interest,'' including examples.
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(a)(3) revises the language in current Sec.
7501.104(a)(5). A new exception is proposed that allows all new HUD
employees who already have a tenant receiving Section 8 subsidies to
retain that tenant until the tenant terminates his or her lease.
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(a)(3)(i)(E) adds a new exception permitting HUD
employees to receive a Section 8 subsidy for the rental of properties
located in areas of Presidentially declared emergency or natural
disaster with prior written approval from an agency designee. HUD's
experience demonstrates that in rare instances (e.g., Hurricane Katrina
in 2005 or the 2008 flooding in Cedar Rapids, Iowa), there may be an
extreme shortage of affordable housing in an area due to a natural
disaster or other emergency. This exception would permit HUD employees
with rentable properties in these areas to accept new tenants receiving
Section 8 subsidies. These supplemental ethics regulations are intended
to uphold the integrity of HUD's administration of the Section 8
program and are not intended to further restrict the availability of
Section 8 housing, especially in times of acute housing shortages.
The exceptions provided by proposed Sec. 7501.104(a)(3) continue
as long as the tenant continues to reside in the property and as long
as the rent charged the tenant is not increased above the annual rate
adjustments permitted by the Section 8 program. This first condition
codifies HUD's intent not to require an employee to terminate the
rental arrangement early or require a Section 8 tenant to move based
solely on these regulations. The second condition preserves the current
language of the exceptions.
Current Sec. 7501.104(a)(6) is proposed to be removed. The current
prohibition against ``direct creditor interests'' is undefined and
unclear.
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(b), which provides exceptions to this
section on prohibited financial interests, is revised to add the phrase
``directly or indirectly receiving, acquiring or owning'' to ensure
consistency with Sec. 7501.104(a). Additionally, this section proposes
to expand the exceptions by eliminating from current Sec.
7501.104(b)(1) the prohibition on owning investment funds that
concentrate in residential mortgages or mortgage-backed securities.
This prohibition is no longer needed to maintain the integrity of HUD
in light of the fact that HUD no longer has regulatory authority over
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(b)(1) also provides an exception to the
interests prohibited under proposed Sec. 7501.104(a)(2). Section
7501.104(b)(1) allows the employee, or the employee's spouse or minor
child, to have a financial interest in a publicly available or publicly
traded investment fund that may include interests that are prohibited
under Sec. 7501.104(a)(2), as long as the employee, or the employee's
spouse or minor child, neither exercises control nor has the ability to
exercise control over the fund or the financial interests held in the
fund. This exception allows the employee, or the employee's spouse or
minor child, to have an interest in an investment fund that may hold
interests in HUD subsidized projects. HUD's experience has been that it
is extremely difficult to determine which investment funds have
interests in HUD-subsidized projects, since that information is not
readily available. Therefore, HUD has decided that this type of
interest does not present an appearance problem and is therefore
permissible.
Current Sec. 7501.104(b)(2) is proposed to be removed. Read
literally, this exception had no possible application to a limited
partnership holding. Also, limited partnerships create no less of an
appearance issue than other legal entities that could be used as an
investment vehicle and do not warrant the specific exception.
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(b)(2) provides that a HUD employee may
obtain mortgage insurance provided by FHA under section 203 of the
National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709) to assist in his or her purchase
of a single-family home that serves as the employee's principal
residence and of one other single-family residence. Proposed Sec.
7501.104(b)(2) provides notice to HUD employees that they must adhere
to the procedures established by the Assistant Secretary for Housing-
FHA Commissioner in order to obtain FHA insurance. This exception was
previously found in Sec. 7501.104(b)(3).
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(b)(3) covers HUD employees' purchases of
HUD-owned homes. This provision is currently an exception within the
prohibition of Sec. 7501.104(a)(4); however, since the provision is
permissive, HUD has moved the exception to proposed Sec. 7501.104(b),
where the other exceptions to the prohibitions to Sec. 7501.104(a) are
located. Current Sec. 7501.104(a)(4) notifies employees that the
purchase of HUD-held properties must be consistent with an Office of
Housing handbook that is now outdated. To avoid the codification of
references to HUD handbooks that may become obsolete, and thus create a
discrepancy with the supplemental standards, proposed Sec.
7501.104(b)(3) does not reference a specific Office of Housing
handbook, but simply provides notice to HUD employees that they must
adhere to the procedures established by the Assistant Secretary for
Housing--FHA Commissioner in order to purchase a HUD-held property.
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(b)(4) has been added to ensure that the
employment compensation and benefits package for an employee's spouse
is not covered as a prohibited financial interest if the employee's
spouse is employed by an entity that may have interests in HUD projects
that are prohibited under proposed Sec. 7501.104(a)(2). For example,
an employee's spouse is not restricted from earning a salary and other
benefits as compensation for employment with a real estate development
company that does multifamily business with HUD.
Proposed Sec. 7501.104(b)(5) contains a revised provision that
permits employees, or their spouses or minor children, to hold
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) securities. The
ownership of GNMA securities is currently addressed in Sec.
7501.104(b)(1). Under this provision, an employee or the spouse or
minor child of an employee may not own an interest in an investment
fund that has an objective or practice of investing in residential
mortgages or securities backed by residential mortgages except those of
GNMA. Since HUD is proposing to revise Sec. 7501.104(b)(1), the
provision addressing ownership of GNMA securities is established as a
separate exception.
[[Page 15000]]
Section 7501.105 Outside Activities
Proposed Sec. 7501.105 governs the outside activities of HUD
employees. This proposed section has been revised to account for
changes in HUD's regulatory authority and to provide clarity on
restricted real estate activities. The proposed rule is designed to
balance several important ethical principles against an employee's
right to engage in outside activities.
HUD has determined that maintaining the policy against employment
in businesses related to real estate or manufactured housing is
necessary to protect against questions regarding the impartiality and
objectivity of employees in the administration of HUD programs.
Allowing such activity would hinder HUD in meeting its missions if
members of the public question whether HUD employees are using their
public positions or HUD connections to advance their outside real
estate-related employment. While HUD has determined that this concern
remains valid, HUD has also concluded that implementing this rule in
its current form has led to inconsistent application and confusion.
Therefore, HUD is proposing a number of amendments to clarify the
intent of the prohibition.
Proposed Sec. 7501.105(a)(1) is amended by removing the phrase
``involving active participation'' with a real estate-related business.
By removing this term, HUD does not intend to change the application of
the prohibition contained in Sec. 7501.105(a)(1) of the current rule;
rather, HUD intends to make the prohibition less confusing and more
transparent. The term ``involving active participation'' with a real
estate-related business encompasses two prohibitions. First, it
prohibits employment with a real estate-related business and, second,
it prohibits ownership of a real estate-related business. The term led
to some confusion in the application of these prohibitions by
conflating the concepts of employment in a business related to real
estate and the ownership activities of operating or managing investment
properties. To rectify any confusion, HUD has separated the prohibition
against the ownership activities of operating and managing a real
estate-related business involving investment properties from the
employment prohibition, by adding Sec. 7501.105(a)(2), which prohibits
the operation or management of investment properties to the extent that
doing so rises to the level of a real estate business. To make the
prohibition more transparent, HUD has decided to codify longstanding
policy by listing several factors that it uses to consider whether the
employee's actions of operating or managing investment properties rises
to the level of a real estate business and falls within the
prohibition. HUD first announced these factors in the 1995 preamble to
the proposed version of the current rule. By listing these factors in
the rule, HUD has not changed the scope of the current prohibition;
rather, it has made the prohibition more transparent by including in
the rule the factors that are used to determine a violation of the
prohibition. Therefore, HUD employees may continue to own or manage
investment properties, so long as that ownership or management does not
rise to the level of operation or management of a real estate-related
business. In a further effort to make the rule more transparent, HUD
has decided to codify existing policy by stating in Sec.
7501.105(a)(2) that HUD will consider these situations on an individual
basis.
Proposed Sec. 7501.105(a)(3) is amended to prohibit outside
employment with a registered lobbying organization that is registered
to lobby HUD. The current regulation cites a repealed statute. The
proposed change would incorporate the definition of a lobbyist under
the Lobbying Disclosure Act (2 U.S.C. 1601, et seq.), although applying
only to entities that lobby HUD. This change will allow easier
compliance by employees and review by ethics staff because of the ease
of checking the lobbying database of the U.S. House of Representatives
and the U.S. Senate to determine if a potential employer is prohibited.
Proposed Sec. 7501.105(a)(4) is amended to remove the specific
restriction on employees having outside positions with Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. As previously discussed, HUD no longer has general
regulatory authority over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Further, under
proposed Sec. 7501.105(a)(1), employees would be prohibited from
employment with a business related to real estate. This prohibition
would cover employment with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Therefore, a
specific prohibition is not necessary.
Proposed Sec. 7501.105(b)(1)(ii) is amended to clarify that the
outside employment prohibitions do not prohibit employees from serving
as a member of an employee's homeowners' association. HUD previously
permitted serving on the board of a cooperative and condominium
association, and HUD has determined that serving on the board of a
homeowners' association does not create additional ethics concerns.
HUD has added Sec. 7501.105(b)(2), which codifies HUD's
longstanding policy that employees with a real estate agent's license
may continue to hold such license. An employee may only use his or her
license in relation to purchasing or selling a single-family property
for use as the employee's primary residence, or for the primary
residence of an immediate family of the employee. Employees seeking to
use their real estate license for this purpose, however, must obtain
the prior written approval of an agency ethics official. HUD has
revised Sec. 7501.105(c) to add the requirement for prior written
approval from an agency ethics official for employees seeking to use
their real estate license for this purpose.
Proposed Sec. 7501.105(c)(1) would require an employee to receive
written approval prior to accepting a position of authority with a
prohibited source. This section had previously extended only to
organizations that directly or indirectly received HUD assistance. This
section has been expanded to include all prohibited sources, because
HUD has determined that taking a position of authority with any
prohibited source, not just those which receive HUD funding, could
create the appearance of a conflict of interest and should therefore be
examined by an agency ethics official. Further, the section will now be
easier for employees to understand, because prohibited source is a term
with which they are familiar. As discussed, HUD proposes to add the
requirement at Sec. 7501.105(c)(1)(iv) for prior written approval from
an agency ethics official for employees seeking to use their real
estate license in relation to purchasing or selling a single-family
property for use as the employee's primary residence or as the primary
residence of an immediate family member of the employee.
Proposed Sec. 7501.105 would eliminate the reference to voluntary
services. That section cited only other regulations, and HUD has
determined that it is no longer needed to ensure public confidence in
the impartiality and objectivity with which HUD programs are
administered.
Proposed Sec. 7501.105(d) incorporates HUD's policy regarding
liaison representatives, which was previously provided as a Note. This
change will avoid any confusion over the concept and its authority.
Section 7501.106 Bureau Instructions and Designation of Separate Agency
Components
HUD proposes to remove this section as currently codified. As
previously discussed in this preamble, HUD no longer has general
regulatory authority over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In its place, HUD
is proposing to add a new Sec. 7501.106 that clarifies the authority
of
[[Page 15001]]
the Office of the Inspector General in the agency's ethics program and
establishes it as a separate component as provided for by 5 CFR
2635.203(a).
In 1992, Congress enacted the Federal Housing Enterprise Financial
Safety and Soundness Act (FHEFSSA) (12 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.), which
revamped the statutory requirements and regulatory structure of the
GSEs by separating the GSEs' financial regulation from its mission
regulation. FHEFSSA also established the Office of Federal Housing
Enterprise Oversight as an independent regulatory office within HUD to
ensure the GSEs' financial safety and soundness, while the Secretary of
HUD retained responsibility for the mission regulation and all other
general regulatory powers. FHEFSSA also required HUD to prohibit the
GSEs from discriminating in their mortgage purchases. The fair housing
authority was twofold: first, to take remedial action against lenders
found to have engaged in discriminatory lending practices and second,
to periodically review and comment on the GSEs' underwriting and
appraisal guidelines to ensure consistency with the Fair Housing Act
(42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.). In 2008, HERA transferred all regulatory
oversight of the GSEs from HUD to FHFA, except for this fair housing
component.
HUD's only remaining direct regulation of the GSEs is the periodic
review of their underwriting and appraisal guidelines by the Office of
Systemic Investigation of HUD's Office of Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity and by the Fair Housing Enforcement Division of HUD's
Office of General Counsel. For employees involved in these compliance
reviews, 18 U.S.C. 208, which prohibits employees from participating in
matters that may affect their financial interests, would prohibit them
from participating in official matters such as these reviews if the
employee also owns a financial interest that could be affected by the
review. Therefore, these employees would be required to recuse
themselves from the official matter or divest their financial interest
without the need for an additional HUD-specific regulation. The
criminal statute is sufficient to insure against conflicts in those HUD
employees when the periodic review is underway.
HUD has determined that the prohibitions in the current Sec.
7501.106 are unnecessary given HUD's very limited role regarding the
GSEs. The current Sec. 7501.106 prohibits certain employees that were
involved with GSEs from owning securities in certain mortgage
institutions that originate, insure, or service mortgages owned or
guaranteed by the GSEs. However, HUD employees no longer regulate the
GSEs in a way that could affect the stock value of these mortgage
institutions.
Additionally, there are other regulations that cover an appearance
issue that might arise for those employees working on fair housing
compliance review of the GSEs. Specifically, OGE regulations at 5 CFR
2635.502 would apply and would limit the activity that employees who
are involved in the periodic review of the GSEs can engage in with
respect to a financial interest in a mortgage institution that
currently originates, insures, or services mortgages owned or
guaranteed by the GSEs.
Accordingly removing these prohibitions would not compromise the
integrity of HUD's functions.
The new proposed Sec. 7501.106(a) delegates to the Bureau Ethics
Counselor the authority to designate Deputy Bureau Ethics Counselors to
make determinations, issue explanatory guidance, and establish
procedures necessary to implement this part, subpart I of 5 CFR 2634,
and 5 CFR part 2635 for his or her bureau. The proposed rule also
includes the concurrence of the Designated Agency Ethics Official on
the delegation. This designation is consistent with 5 CFR 2635.105(c),
more clearly describes the role and responsibility of the OIG in the
agency's ethics program, and maintains the independence of the IG as
provided for by the Inspector General Act, as amended.
Additionally, consistent with 5 CFR 2635.203(a), new proposed Sec.
7501.106(b) designates the OIG as a separate agency component. HUD is
designating the OIG as a separate agency component to make the
structure of its ethics program more consistent with the structure used
by other federal agencies. HUD's changes are intended to more clearly
describe the role and responsibility of the OIG in the agency's ethics
program, and maintain the independence and authority of the IG. The
designation as a separate agency component authorizes Bureau Ethics
Counselors within the OIG to render legal ethics advice regarding the
regulations contained in subpart B of 5 CFR part 2635, governing gifts
from outside sources; and 5 CFR 2635.807, governing teaching, speaking,
or writing.
III. Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Administrative Procedure Act
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on this
proposed amendatory rulemaking, to be received by DATES section of this
proposed rule. The comments will be carefully considered and
appropriate changes will be made before a final rule is adopted and
published in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if the
regulation is necessary, to select the regulatory approach that
maximizes net benefits. Because this rule relates solely to the
internal operations of HUD, this rule was determined to be not a
significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and therefore was not reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally
requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities because this rule pertains only to HUD employees.
Information Collection Requirements
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) does not
apply to this regulation because it does not contain information
collection requirements subject to the approval of OMB.
Environmental Impact
In accordance with 40 CFR 1508.4 of the regulations of the Council
on Environmental Quality and 24 CFR 50.20(k) of the HUD regulations,
the policies and procedures contained in this rule relate only to
internal administrative procedures whose content does not constitute a
development decision nor affect the physical condition of project areas
or building sites, and therefore, are categorically excluded from the
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits, to the
extent practicable and permitted by law, an agency from promulgating a
regulation
[[Page 15002]]
that has federalism implications and either imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local governments and is not required by
statute or preempts state law, unless the relevant requirements of
section 6 of the Executive Order are met. This rule does not have
federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and
tribal governments, and on the private sector. Since it is only
directed toward HUD employees, this rule would not impose any federal
mandates on any state, local, or tribal governments, or on the private
sector, within the meaning of the UMRA
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 7501
Conflicts of interests.
Accordingly, for the reasons described in the preamble, HUD, with
the concurrence of OGE, proposes to amend 5 CFR part 7501, as follows:
PART 7501--SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR EMPLOYEES
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Sec.
7501.101 Purpose.
7501.102 Definitions.
7501.103 Waivers.
7501.104 Prohibited financial interests.
7501.105 Outside activities.
7501.106 Bureau instructions and designation of separate agency
component.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7301, 7351, 7353; 5 U.S.C. App. (Ethics
in Government Act of 1978); E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989
Comp., p. 215, as modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547, 3 CFR, 1990
Comp., p. 306; 5 CFR 2635.105, 2635.203(a), 2635.403(a), 2635.803,
2635.807.
Sec. 7501.101 Purpose.
In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part
apply to employees of the Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD or Department) and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635.
Employees are required to comply with 5 CFR part 2635, this part, and
any additional rules of conduct that the Department is authorized to
issue.
Sec. 7501.102 Definitions.
For purposes of this part, and otherwise as indicated, the
following definitions shall apply:
Agency designee, as used also in 5 CFR part 2635, means the
Associate General Counsel for Ethics and Personnel Law, the Assistant
General Counsel for the Ethics Law Division, and the HUD Regional
Counsels.
Agency ethics official, as used also in 5 CFR part 2635, means the
agency designees as specified above.
Affiliate means any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is
under common control with another entity.
Bureau means the Office of the Inspector General.
Bureau Ethics Counselor means the General Counsel for the Bureau.
Deputy Bureau Ethics Counselor means the Bureau employee or
employees who the Bureau Ethics Counselor has delegated responsibility
to act under Sec. 7501.106 for the Bureau.
Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO) means the General Counsel
of HUD or the Deputy General Counsel for Operations in the absence of
the General Counsel.
Employment means any compensated or uncompensated (including
volunteer work for others while off-duty) form of non-Federal activity
or business relationship, including self-employment, that involves the
provision of personal services by the employee. It includes, but is not
limited to, personal services as an officer, director, employee, agent,
attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, trustee, teacher, or
speaker. It includes writing when done under an arrangement with
another person for production or publication of the written product.
Sec. 7501.103 Waivers.
The Designated Agency Ethics Official, or the Bureau Ethics
Counselor for a Bureau employee may waive any provision of this part
upon finding that the waiver will not result in conduct inconsistent
with 5 CFR part 2635 and is not otherwise prohibited by law and that
application of the provision is not necessary to ensure public
confidence in the Department's impartial and objective administration
of its programs. Each waiver shall be in writing and supported by a
statement of the facts and findings upon which it is based and may
impose appropriate conditions, such as requiring the employee's
execution of a written disqualification statement. A waiver will be
considered only in response to a written waiver request submitted to an
agency ethics official. The waiver request should include:
(1) The requesting employee's Branch, Unit, and a detailed
description of his or her official duties;
(2) The nature and extent of the proposed waiver;
(3) A detailed statement of the facts supporting the request; and
(4) The basis for the request, such as undue hardship or other
exigent circumstances.
Sec. 7501.104 Prohibited financial interests.
(a) General requirement. This section applies to all HUD employees
except special Government employees. Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, the employee, or the employee's spouse or minor
child, shall not directly or indirectly receive, acquire, or own:
(1) Federal Housing Administration (FHA) debentures or certificates
of claim.
(2) A financial interest in a project, including any single family
dwelling or unit, which is subsidized by the Department, or which is
subject to a note or mortgage or other security interest insured by the
Department. The definition of ``financial interest'' is found at 5 CFR
2635.403(c).
(3)(i) Any Department subsidy provided pursuant to Section 8 of the
United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1437f), to or
on behalf of a tenant of property owned by the employee or the
employee's spouse or minor child. However, such subsidy is permitted
when:
(A) The employee, or the employee's spouse or minor child acquires,
without specific intent as through inheritance, a property in which a
tenant receiving such a subsidy already resides;
(B) The tenant receiving such a subsidy lived in the rental
property before the employee worked for the Department;
(C) The tenant receiving such a subsidy is a parent, child,
grandchild, or sibling of the employee;
(D) The employee's, or the employee's spouse or minor child's,
rental property has an incumbent tenant who has not previously received
such a subsidy and becomes the beneficiary thereof; or
(E) The location of the rental property is in a Presidentially
declared emergency or natural disaster area and the employee receives
prior written approval from an agency designee.
(ii) The exception provided by paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section
continues only as long as:
(A) The tenant continues to reside in the property; and
(B) There is no increase in that tenant's rent upon the
commencement
[[Page 15003]]
of subsidy payments other than normal annual adjustments under the
Section 8 program.
(b) Exception to prohibition for certain interests. Nothing in this
section prohibits the employee, or the employee's spouse or minor child
from directly or indirectly receiving, acquiring, or owning:
(1) A financial interest in a publicly available or publicly traded
investment fund that includes financial interests prohibited by
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, so long as the employee neither
exercises control nor has the ability to exercise control over the fund
or the financial interests held in the fund;
(2) Mortgage insurance provided pursuant to section 203 of the
National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709) on the employee's principal
residence and any one other single family residence. Employees must
adhere to the procedures established by the Assistant Secretary for
Housing--FHA Commissioner in order to obtain FHA insurance;
(3) Department-owned single family property. Employees must adhere
to the procedures established by the Assistant Secretary for Housing--
FHA Commissioner in order to purchase a HUD-held property;
(4) Employment compensation and benefit packages provided by the
employer of an employee's spouse that include financial interests
prohibited by paragraph (a)(2) of this section; or
(5) Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) securities.
(c) Reporting and divestiture. An employee must report, in writing,
to the appropriate agency ethics official, any interest prohibited
under paragraph (a) of this section acquired prior to the commencement
of employment with the Department or without specific intent, as
through gift, inheritance, or marriage, within 30 days from the date of
the start of employment or acquisition of such interest. Such interest
must be divested within 90 days from the date reported unless waived by
the Designated Agency Ethics Official in accordance with Sec.
7501.103.
Sec. 7501.105 Outside activities.
(a) Prohibited outside activities. Subject to the exceptions set
forth in paragraph (b) of this section, HUD employees, except special
Government employees, shall not engage in:
(1) Employment with a business related to real estate or
manufactured housing including, but not limited to, real estate
brokerage, management and sales, architecture, engineering, mortgage
lending, property insurance, appraisal services, title search services,
construction, construction financing, land planning, or real estate
development;
(2) The operation or management of investment properties to the
extent that it rises to the level of a real estate-related business.
HUD will determine whether an employee is operating or managing
investment properties to an extent that it rises to the level of a real
estate business based on the totality of the circumstances, and will
consider whether the employee maintains an office; advertises or
otherwise solicits clients or business; hires staff or employees; uses
business stationary or other similar materials; files the business as a
corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or other type of
business association with a state government; establishes a formal or
informal association with an existing business; hires a management
company; and the nature and number of its investment properties;
(3) Employment with a person or entity who registered as a lobbyist
or lobbyist organization pursuant to 2 U.S.C 1603(a) and engages in
lobbying activity concerning the Department;
(4) Employment as an officer or director with a Department-approved
mortgagee, a lending institution, or an organization that services
securities for the Department; or
(5) Employment with the Federal Home Loan Bank System or any
affiliate thereof.
(b) Exceptions to employment prohibitions. The prohibitions set
forth in paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to:
(1) Serving as an officer or a member of the Board of Directors of:
(i) A Federal Credit Union;
(ii) A cooperative, condominium association, or homeowners
association for a housing project that is not subject to regulation by
the Department or, if so regulated, in which the employee personally
resides; or
(iii) An entity designated in writing by the Designated Agency
Ethics Official.
(2) Holding a real estate agent's license; however, use of the
license is limited as provided by paragraph (c) of this section.
(c) Prior approval requirement. (1) Employees, except special
Government employees, shall obtain the prior written approval of an
Agency Ethics Official before accepting compensated or uncompensated
employment:
(i) As an officer, director, trustee, or general partner of, or in
any other position of authority with a prohibited source, as defined at
5 CFR 2635.203(d);
(ii) With a state or local government;
(iii) In the same professional field as that of the employee's
official position; or
(iv) As a real estate agent in relation to purchasing or selling a
single family property for use as the employee's primary residence, or
the primary residence of the employee's immediate family member.
(2) Approval shall be granted unless the conduct is inconsistent
with 5 CFR part 2635 or this part.
(d) Liaison representative. An employee designated to serve in an
official capacity as the Department's liaison representative to an
outside organization is not engaged in an outside activity to which
this section applies. Notwithstanding, an employee may be designated to
serve as the Department's liaison representative only as authorized by
law, and as approved by the Department under applicable procedures.
Sec. 7501.106 Bureau instructions and designation of separate agency
component.
(a) Bureau instructions. With the concurrence of the Designated
Agency Ethics Official, the Bureau Ethics Counselor is authorized,
consistent with 5 CFR 2635.105(c), to designate Deputy Bureau Ethics
Counselors, to make a determination, issue explanatory guidance, and
establish procedures necessary to implement this part, subpart I of 5
CFR part 2634, and 5 CFR part 2635 for the Bureau.
(b) Designation of separate agency component. Pursuant to 5 CFR
2635.203(a), the Office of the Inspector General is designated as a
separate agency for purposes of the regulations contained in subpart B
of 5 CFR part 2635, governing gifts from outside sources; and 5 CFR
2635.807, governing teaching, speaking, or writing.
Dated: February 15, 2012.
Don W. Fox,
Principal Deputy Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2012-6177 Filed 3-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P