FY 2012 Discretionary Livability Funding Opportunity: Alternatives Analysis Program, 14587-14590 [2012-5895]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 48 / Monday, March 12, 2012 / Notices
agencies concurred with this
conclusion, and they will cooperate in
preparing the SEIS.
The scope of the SEIS is limited to the
social, economic, and environmental
effects of constructing and operating a
bridge instead of a snowshed at MP
58.15 to meet avalanche protection and
control needs in an area where I–90
currently experiences road closures in
winter for avalanche control. Since
issues and concerns related to the I–90
improvements are well known from the
extensive public involvement
previously conducted as part of the
original Draft and Final EIS, formal
scoping will not be conducted.
The proposed design change and
associated SEIS will be incorporated
into the ongoing series of
communications and meetings that keep
agencies, tribes, organizations, and
individuals informed on the I–90
improvements. Written and verbal
comments on the Draft SEIS will be
taken by mail, on the project Web site,
and at hearings. Public notice will be
given on the time and place of the future
open houses.
Questions concerning this proposed
design change and the SEIS should be
directed to both Liana Liu (FHWA) and
Jason Smith (WSDOT) at the addresses
or phone numbers provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 20.205, Highway Research,
Planning and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Issued on: March 6, 2012.
Daniel Mathis,
Division Administrator, Olympia,
Washington.
[FR Doc. 2012–5865 Filed 3–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FY 2012 Discretionary Livability
Funding Opportunity: Alternatives
Analysis Program
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of funding availability
for FTA Alternatives Analysis Program:
Solicitation of Project Proposals.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) announces the
availability of Section 5339 Alternatives
Analysis program discretionary funds
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012. FTA will
distribute these funds in accordance
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:55 Mar 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
with the mission of this program,
consistent with the eligibility
requirements of this program, and in
support of the U.S. Department of
Transportation’s (DOT) livability efforts.
The Surface and Air Transportation
Programs Extension Act of 2011
(Temporary Authorization, 2012),
Public Law 112–30, continues the
authorization of the Federal transit
programs of the U.S. DOT through
March 31, 2012. Subject to action by
Congress, FTA will fund the
Alternatives Analysis program with
approximately $25 million of
unallocated Section 5339 funds made
available by the Temporary
Authorization.
This notice solicits proposals to
compete for FY 2012 funding under the
aforementioned program and livability
initiative. Contingent on subsequent
appropriations by Congress, FTA may
also award FY 2013 funds to proposals
submitted pursuant to this notice.
This notice includes priorities
established by FTA for these
discretionary funds, the criteria FTA
will use to identify meritorious projects
for funding, and describes how to apply
for funding. This announcement is
available on the FTA Web site at:
https://www.fta.dot.gov. A synopsis of
the funding opportunity will be posted
in the FIND module of the governmentwide electronic grants Web site at
https://www.GRANTS.GOV. FTA will
announce final selections on the FTA
Web site and may also announce
selections in the Federal Register.
DATES: Complete proposals must be
submitted by 11:59 p.m. EDT on April
19, 2012. All proposals must be
submitted electronically through the
GRANTS.GOV ‘‘APPLY’’ function. Any
prospective proposer intending to apply
should initiate the process of registering
on the GRANTS.GOV site immediately
to ensure completion of registration
before the submission deadline.
Instructions for applying can be found
on FTA’s Web site at https://www.fta.dot.
gov/alternativesanalysis and in the
‘‘FIND’’ module of GRANTS.GOV.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact the
appropriate FTA Regional Office found
at https://www.fta.dot.gov for proposalspecific information and issues. For
program-specific questions about
applying to the Alternatives Analysis
program outlined in this notice, please
contact Kenneth Cervenka, Office of
Planning and Environment, (202) 493–
0512, email: kenneth.cervenka@dot.gov.
A TDD is available at 1–800–877–8339
(TDD/FIRS).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14587
Table of Contents
I. Overview of FTA Discretionary Program
A. Authority
B. Policy Priorities
II. Discretionary Program Information
A. Description and Purpose
B. Eligibility Information
C. Evaluation Criteria, Review, and
Selection
III. Proposal and Submission Information
IV. Award Administration
V. Agency Contacts and Technical Assistance
I. Overview of FTA Discretionary
Program
A. Authority
Section 5339(a) of Title 49, United
States Code authorizes the Secretary to
make awards for FTA’s Alternatives
Analysis program and states:
The Secretary may award grants to States,
authorities of the States, metropolitan
planning organizations, and local
governmental authorities to develop
alternatives analyses as defined by section
5309(a)(1).
Section 5309(a)(1) defines
‘‘alternatives analysis’’ as:
A study conducted as part of the
transportation planning process required
under sections 5303 and 5304, which
includes—
(A) An assessment of a wide range of
public transportation alternatives designed to
address a transportation problem in a
corridor or subarea;
(B) Sufficient information to enable the
Secretary to make the findings of project
justification and local financial commitment
required under this section;
(C) The selection of a locally preferred
alternative; and
(D) The adoption of the locally preferred
alternative as part of the long-range
transportation plan required under section
5303.
B. Policy Priorities
Maintaining transit assets in a state of
good repair, fostering livable
communities and promoting sustainable
development, and improving our
Nation’s environment through
investments in clean energy resources,
have been key strategic goals of the
Department of Transportation (DOT)
and FTA. Studies funded as a result of
this notice will further the Department’s
livability efforts by supporting the study
of tangible livability improvements
within the existing Alternatives
Analysis program while demonstrating
the feasibility and value of such
improvements.
Livable Communities and Sustainable
Development
FTA has long fostered livable
communities and sustainable
development through its various transit
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14588
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 48 / Monday, March 12, 2012 / Notices
programs and activities. Public
transportation supports the
development of communities, providing
effective and reliable transportation
options that increase access to jobs,
recreation, health and social services,
entertainment, educational
opportunities, and other activities of
daily life, while also improving mobility
within and among these communities.
Through various initiatives and
legislative changes over the last fifteen
years, FTA has allowed and encouraged
projects that help integrate transit into
a community through neighborhood
improvements and enhancements to
transportation facilities or services;
make improvements to areas adjacent to
public transit facilities that may
facilitate mobility needs of transit users;
or support other infrastructure
investments that enhance the use of
transit and other transportation options
for the community.
On June 16, 2009, U.S. DOT Secretary
Ray LaHood, U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Secretary Shaun Donovan, and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Administrator Lisa Jackson announced a
new partnership to help American
families in all communities—rural,
suburban and urban—gain better access
to affordable housing, more
transportation options, and lower
transportation costs. DOT, HUD, and
EPA created this high-level interagency
partnership to better coordinate federal
transportation, environmental
protection, and housing investments.
The Alternatives Analysis program
will invest in studies that fulfill the
following six livability principles that
serve as the foundation for the DOT–
HUD–EPA Partnership for Sustainable
Communities:
• Provide more transportation
choices: Develop safe, reliable, and
economical transportation choices to
decrease household transportation costs,
reduce our nation’s dependence on
foreign oil, improve air quality, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and promote
public health.
• Promote equitable, affordable
housing: Expand location- and energyefficient housing choices for people of
all ages, incomes, races and ethnicities
to increase mobility and lower the
combined cost of housing and
transportation.
• Enhance economic competitiveness:
Improve economic competitiveness
through reliable and timely access to
employment centers, educational
opportunities, services and other basic
needs by workers as well as expanded
business access to markets.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:55 Mar 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
• Support existing communities:
Target Federal funding toward existing
communities—through such strategies
as transit-oriented, mixed-use
development and land recycling— to
increase community revitalization,
improve the efficiency of public works
investments, and safeguard rural
landscapes.
• Coordinate policies and leverage
investment: Align policies and funding
to remove barriers to collaboration,
leverage funding and increase the
accountability and effectiveness of all
levels of government to plan for future
growth, including making smart energy
choices such as locally generated
renewable energy.
• Value communities and
neighborhoods: Enhance the unique
characteristics of all communities by
investing in healthy, safe and walkable
neighborhoods—rural, urban or
suburban.
II. Discretionary Program Information
A. Description and Purpose
As defined in 49 U.S.C. 5309(a)(1), an
alternatives analysis is a study
conducted as part of the transportation
planning process required under
Sections 5303 and 5304 which includes:
(1) An assessment of a wide range of
public transportation alternatives
designed to address a transportation
problem in a corridor or subarea; (2) the
development of sufficient information to
enable the Secretary to make the
findings of project justification and local
financial commitment required under
Section 5309; (3) the selection of a
locally preferred alternative; and (4) the
adoption of the locally preferred
alternative as part of the long-range
transportation plan required under
Section 5303.
The funds available through this
notice includes assistance to potential
sponsors of New Starts and Small Starts
projects in the evaluation of all
reasonable transportation alternatives
and general alignment options to
address transportation needs in a
defined travel corridor. Information
about FTA’s New Starts and Small
Starts program can be found on FTA’s
web site at https://fta.dot.gov/12347_
5221.html. FTA will invest in studies
that are performed in accordance with
the mission of the Alternatives Analysis
program and support the six livability
principles that serve as the foundation
for the DOT–HUD–EPA Partnership for
Sustainable Communities.
FTA advises potential proposers that
current provisions of the New Starts and
Small Starts program are subject to
change. On January 25, 2012, FTA
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) that proposes
changes in the measurement of the
existing statutory New Starts and Small
Starts project evaluation criteria.
Additionally, FTA’s current program
authorizations expire on March 31,
2012, and any new authorizing
legislation may prescribe modifications
to FTA’s programs. However, the
effective dates of a final rule and any
new authorizing legislation are
uncertain, and the contents of either are
subject to change from current
proposals. Moreover, changes to the
Federal process will not remove the
need for sponsors of major transit
capital projects to assess costs and
benefits of alternative project modes and
alignments. FTA therefore encourages
potential sponsors of New Starts and
Small Starts projects to maintain their
focus on conducting a technically sound
analysis of alternatives that evaluate
solutions to transportation problems
and facilitate informed decision-making.
B. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Proposers
Section 5339 authorizes FTA to award
grants to States, authorities of the States,
metropolitan planning organizations,
and local governmental authorities to
develop alternatives analyses as defined
by Section 5309(a)(1).
2. Eligible Proposals and Expenses
FTA will award available
discretionary funds to eligible proposers
to conduct a new alternatives analysis
or to support additional technical tasks
in an on-going alternatives analysis that
will improve and expand the
information available to decisionmakers considering major transit
improvements. FTA will consider
proposals for all areas of technical work
that can better develop information
about the costs and benefits of potential
major transit improvements. These
funds are not available for systems
planning work that leads to the
selection of a particular corridor for
conducting an alternatives analysis, or
for work performed after the Locally
Preferred Alternative (LPA) has been
selected. There is no blanket pre-award
authority for studies to be funded under
this notice before FTA’s public
announcement of the selections.
3. Cost Sharing or Matching
The total federal share (Section 5339
funds plus other federal funds) of the
cost of studies or technical tasks
selected for funding may not exceed 80
percent. Section 5339 requests may
range between $50,000 and $2 million.
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 48 / Monday, March 12, 2012 / Notices
Funds remain available for three fiscal
years, including the fiscal year in which
the award is made. FTA will not
approve deferred local share requests
under this program.
C. Evaluation Criteria, Review, and
Selection
2. Review and Selection Process
1. Evaluation Criteria
The submitted proposals will be
evaluated according to the following
criteria. Each proposer is encouraged to
demonstrate the responsiveness of their
proposal to any and all of the selection
criteria with the most relevant
information that the proposer can
provide, regardless of whether such
information has been specifically
requested, or identified, in this notice.
FTA will assess the extent to which the
proposal addresses each of the three
criteria below.
a. Demonstrated Need
Proposers must demonstrate a need
for these funds by identifying a
transportation problem in the study
corridor that warrants an evaluation of
major transit improvements, including
alternatives that may be suitable for
New Starts or Small Starts funding. For
both new and ongoing alternatives
analyses, higher scores will be assigned
to studies in areas that have been
prioritized in the metropolitan planning
process as having a significant
transportation need, particularly
through inclusion of conceptual
corridor improvements in fiscally
constrained long-range transportation
plans. Proposals for both new and
ongoing studies must show there is a
need for these funds to support a
meaningful future analysis of alternative
modes and alignments, as opposed to
efforts aimed at justifying largely
predefined projects.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
b. Advancing Livability
Proposers must describe the proposed
study’s role in broader efforts to
advance the six DOT–HUD–EPA
Livability Principles. Higher scores will
be assigned to proposals that are linked
to a history of concrete actions as well
as ongoing planning efforts to enhance
livability.
c. Study Approach and Outcomes
Proposers must outline a study
approach that is likely to provide
decision-makers with actionable
information about the costs and benefits
of investment alternatives while
meaningfully involving project
stakeholders. Higher scores will be
assigned to proposals that demonstrate
successful outcomes from prior
alternatives analyses, a robust public
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:55 Mar 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
involvement plan, evidence of
partnerships with related organizations
(such as housing- and environmentfocused public agencies), and
demonstration of technical capacity to
complete all work.
In addition to other FTA staff that
may review the proposals, a technical
evaluation committee will review
proposals based on the evaluation
criteria. Members of the technical
evaluation committee and other
involved FTA staff reserve the right to
screen the proposals and seek
clarification from any proposer about
any statement in the proposal that FTA
finds ambiguous and/or request
additional documentation to be
considered during the evaluation
process to clarify information contained
within the proposal. After consideration
of the findings of the technical
evaluation committee, the FTA
Administrator will determine the final
selection and amount of funding for
each study. Geographic diversity and
other discretionary awards may be
considered in FTA’s award decisions.
FTA expects to announce the selected
studies and notify successful proposers
in August 2012.
III. Proposal and Submission
Information
A. Proposal Submission Process
Proposals must be submitted
electronically through https://
www.GRANTS.GOV by 11:59 p.m. EDT,
April 19, 2012. Mail and fax
submissions will not be accepted.
A complete proposal submission will
consist of at least three files: (1) The SF
424 Mandatory form (downloaded from
GRANTS.GOV); (2) the supplemental
form found on the FTA Alternatives
Analysis program Web site: https://
fta.dot.gov/alternativesanalysis; and (3)
a map of the study corridor. The
supplemental form, titled Applicant and
Proposal Profile, provides guidance and
a consistent format for proposers to
respond to the criteria outlined in this
NOFA. Once completed, the
supplemental form and the study
corridor map must be placed in the
attachments section of the SF 424
Mandatory form. Letters of support and
materials referenced in the
supplemental form may also be
submitted as attachments; however,
FTA will not consider narrative beyond
the text that can be accommodated
within the supplemental form’s
character limits.
Within 24–48 hours after submitting
an electronic application, the proposer
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14589
should receive three email messages
from GRANTS.GOV: (1) Confirmation of
successful transmission to
GRANTS.GOV, (2) confirmation of
successful validation by GRANTS.GOV,
and (3) confirmation of successful
validation by FTA. If confirmations of
successful validation are not received
and a notice of failed validation or
incomplete materials is received, the
proposer must address the reason for the
failed validation or incomplete
materials and resubmit before the
submission deadline. If making a
resubmission for any reason, include all
original attachments regardless of which
attachments were updated and check
the box on the supplemental form
indicating this is a resubmission.
Complete instructions on the
application process can be found at
https://www.fta.dot.gov/
alternativesanalysis. Important: FTA
urges proposers to submit their
applications at least 72 hours prior to
the due date to allow time to receive the
validation message and to correct any
problems that may have caused a
rejection notification. Submissions after
the stated submission deadline will not
be accepted. GRANTS.GOV scheduled
maintenance and outage times are
announced on the GRANTS.GOV Web
site https://www.GRANTS.GOV.
Deadlines will not be extended due to
scheduled maintenance or outages.
B. Proposal Content
Information such as applicant name,
federal amount requested, match
amount, description of areas served, etc.
are requested in varying degrees of
detail on both the SF 424 Mandatory
form and supplemental ‘‘Applicant and
Proposal Profile’’ form. All fields are
required unless stated otherwise on the
forms. Use both the ‘‘Check Package for
Errors’’ and the ‘‘Validate Form’’
validation buttons on both forms to
check all required fields on the forms.
Ensure that the ‘‘Federal’’ amount
identified on the SF 424 Mandatory
form is the same as the ‘‘5339 Request’’
total amount calculated on the
supplemental form. For up-to-date
guidance on the completion of all forms,
refer to FTA’s Alternatives Analysis
Web site: https://fta.dot.gov/
alternativesanalysis. The supplemental
form has three sections:
1. Applicant Information
This section contains basic proposer
identification information: organization
legal name, FTA Recipient ID number,
and transit services provided.
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
14590
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 48 / Monday, March 12, 2012 / Notices
2. Project (Study) Information
This section contains background
information about the project (study):
title, proposed scope of work, map of
the study corridor (map attachment to
SF 424 application is required),
descriptions of the corridor, project
budget allocated into major tasks,
including the source of local match, and
time-line for beginning and ending the
major tasks.
3. Evaluation Criteria
This section contains information for
direct use in the evaluation process:
demonstrated need, advancing
livability, and study approach and
outcomes.
C. Submission Dates and Times
Complete proposals for the
Alternatives Analysis program must be
submitted electronically through
GRANTS.GOV by 11:59 p.m. EDT on
April 19, 2012. Proposers are
encouraged to begin the process of
registration on the GRANTS.GOV site
well in advance of the submission
deadline. Registration is a multi-step
process, which may take several weeks
to complete before a proposal can be
submitted. Registered proposers may
still be required to take steps to keep
their registration up to date before
submissions can be made successfully:
(1) registration in the Central Contractor
Repository (CCR) is renewed annually
and (2) persons making submissions on
behalf of the Authorized Organization
Representative (AOR) must be
authorized in GRANTS.GOV by the
AOR to make submissions.
IV. Award Administration
A. Award Notices
At the time the project (study)
selections are announced, FTA will
extend pre-award authority for the
selected projects awarded to current
grantees. There is no blanket pre-award
authority for these projects before
announcement.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
1. Grant Requirements
If selected, applicants will apply for a
grant through TEAM and adhere to the
customary FTA grant requirements of
the Section 5339 Alternatives Analysis
program, including those of FTA
Circular 9300.1B, Circular 5010.1D, and
the labor protections of 49 U.S.C.
Section 5333(b). These grants will be
administered and managed by the FTA
regional offices. The Alternatives
Analysis must be documented in the
Unified Planning Work Program
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:55 Mar 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
(UPWP) of the MPO for the area before
these funds can be used. All
discretionary grants, regardless of award
amount, will be subject to the
Congressional Notification and release
process. Technical assistance regarding
these requirements is available from
each FTA regional office.
2. Standard Assurances
The applicant assures that it will
comply with all applicable Federal
statutes, regulations, executive orders,
FTA circulars, and other Federal
administrative requirements in carrying
out any activity supported by the FTA
grant. The applicant acknowledges that
it is under a continuing obligation to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the grant agreement issued for its
project with FTA. The applicant
understands that Federal laws,
regulations, policies, and administrative
practices might be modified from time
to time and may affect the
implementation of the project. The
applicant agrees that the most recent
Federal requirements will apply to the
project, unless FTA issues a written
determination otherwise. The applicant
must submit the Certifications and
Assurances before receiving a grant if it
does not have current certifications on
file.
3. Reporting
Post-award reporting requirements
include submission of Federal Financial
Reports and Milestone reports in TEAM
on a quarterly basis for all projects.
Documentation is required for payment.
In addition, project sponsors receiving
grants for innovative approaches may be
required to report on the performance of
these approaches.
V. Agency Contacts and Technical
Assistance
Contact the appropriate FTA Regional
Office at https://www.fta.dot.gov for
proposal-specific information and
issues. For general program information,
please use the contact identified in the
front of this notice. During the
application period, FTA may post
answers to commonly asked questions
about the Alternatives Analysis program
at www.fta.dot.gov/alternativesanalysis.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
March, 2012.
Peter Rogoff,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012–5895 Filed 3–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0021]
National Emergency Medical Services
Advisory Council (NEMSAC);
Correction to the Notice of Federal
Advisory Committee Meeting
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Correction to notice of the
National Emergency Medical Services
Advisory Council Meeting on March 29,
2012, to alter the start time from 1 p.m.
EST to 10 a.m. EDT and to adjust other
times from Eastern Standard Time to
Eastern Daylight Time.
AGENCY:
NHTSA is issuing a correction
to a published notice of a meeting of the
NEMSAC to be held in the Metropolitan
Washington, DC area on March 28–30,
2012. This notice announces the correct
date, time, and location of the meeting,
which will be open to the public. The
purpose of NEMSAC is to provide a
nationally recognized council of
emergency medical services (EMS)
representatives and consumers to
provide advice and recommendations
regarding EMS to DOT’s National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
DATES: The NEMSAC meeting will take
place over two and a half days and be
held on
• Wednesday March 28, 2012, from
9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT;
• Thursday March 29, 2012, from
10 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT; and
• Friday March 30, 2012, from 8 a.m.
to 12 p.m. EDT.
NEMSAC committees will meet from
8 a.m. to 10 a.m. EDT on March 29,
2012. Public comment periods will be
scheduled throughout the day of March
28, 2012, as well as from 3:30 p.m. to
4:30 p.m. EDT on March 29, 2012.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held on
the 8th floor of the FHI 360 Conference
Center at 1825 Connecticut Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Drew Dawson, Director, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Office of
Emergency Medical Services, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., NTI–140,
Washington, DC 20590, telephone
number (202) 366–9966; email
Drew.Dawson@dot.gov.
SUMMARY:
Notice of
this meeting is given under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, Public Law
92–463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.).
NEMSAC will meet on March 28–30,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14587-14590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5895]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FY 2012 Discretionary Livability Funding Opportunity:
Alternatives Analysis Program
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of funding availability for FTA Alternatives Analysis
Program: Solicitation of Project Proposals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) announces the
availability of Section 5339 Alternatives Analysis program
discretionary funds for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012. FTA will distribute
these funds in accordance with the mission of this program, consistent
with the eligibility requirements of this program, and in support of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) livability efforts.
The Surface and Air Transportation Programs Extension Act of 2011
(Temporary Authorization, 2012), Public Law 112-30, continues the
authorization of the Federal transit programs of the U.S. DOT through
March 31, 2012. Subject to action by Congress, FTA will fund the
Alternatives Analysis program with approximately $25 million of
unallocated Section 5339 funds made available by the Temporary
Authorization.
This notice solicits proposals to compete for FY 2012 funding under
the aforementioned program and livability initiative. Contingent on
subsequent appropriations by Congress, FTA may also award FY 2013 funds
to proposals submitted pursuant to this notice.
This notice includes priorities established by FTA for these
discretionary funds, the criteria FTA will use to identify meritorious
projects for funding, and describes how to apply for funding. This
announcement is available on the FTA Web site at: https://www.fta.dot.gov. A synopsis of the funding opportunity will be posted
in the FIND module of the government-wide electronic grants Web site at
https://www.GRANTS.GOV. FTA will announce final selections on the FTA
Web site and may also announce selections in the Federal Register.
DATES: Complete proposals must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. EDT on April
19, 2012. All proposals must be submitted electronically through the
GRANTS.GOV ``APPLY'' function. Any prospective proposer intending to
apply should initiate the process of registering on the GRANTS.GOV site
immediately to ensure completion of registration before the submission
deadline. Instructions for applying can be found on FTA's Web site at
https://www.fta.dot.gov/alternativesanalysis and in the ``FIND'' module
of GRANTS.GOV.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact the appropriate FTA Regional Office
found at https://www.fta.dot.gov for proposal-specific information and
issues. For program-specific questions about applying to the
Alternatives Analysis program outlined in this notice, please contact
Kenneth Cervenka, Office of Planning and Environment, (202) 493-0512,
email: kenneth.cervenka@dot.gov. A TDD is available at 1-800-877-8339
(TDD/FIRS).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Overview of FTA Discretionary Program
A. Authority
B. Policy Priorities
II. Discretionary Program Information
A. Description and Purpose
B. Eligibility Information
C. Evaluation Criteria, Review, and Selection
III. Proposal and Submission Information
IV. Award Administration
V. Agency Contacts and Technical Assistance
I. Overview of FTA Discretionary Program
A. Authority
Section 5339(a) of Title 49, United States Code authorizes the
Secretary to make awards for FTA's Alternatives Analysis program and
states:
The Secretary may award grants to States, authorities of the
States, metropolitan planning organizations, and local governmental
authorities to develop alternatives analyses as defined by section
5309(a)(1).
Section 5309(a)(1) defines ``alternatives analysis'' as:
A study conducted as part of the transportation planning process
required under sections 5303 and 5304, which includes--
(A) An assessment of a wide range of public transportation
alternatives designed to address a transportation problem in a
corridor or subarea;
(B) Sufficient information to enable the Secretary to make the
findings of project justification and local financial commitment
required under this section;
(C) The selection of a locally preferred alternative; and
(D) The adoption of the locally preferred alternative as part of
the long-range transportation plan required under section 5303.
B. Policy Priorities
Maintaining transit assets in a state of good repair, fostering
livable communities and promoting sustainable development, and
improving our Nation's environment through investments in clean energy
resources, have been key strategic goals of the Department of
Transportation (DOT) and FTA. Studies funded as a result of this notice
will further the Department's livability efforts by supporting the
study of tangible livability improvements within the existing
Alternatives Analysis program while demonstrating the feasibility and
value of such improvements.
Livable Communities and Sustainable Development
FTA has long fostered livable communities and sustainable
development through its various transit
[[Page 14588]]
programs and activities. Public transportation supports the development
of communities, providing effective and reliable transportation options
that increase access to jobs, recreation, health and social services,
entertainment, educational opportunities, and other activities of daily
life, while also improving mobility within and among these communities.
Through various initiatives and legislative changes over the last
fifteen years, FTA has allowed and encouraged projects that help
integrate transit into a community through neighborhood improvements
and enhancements to transportation facilities or services; make
improvements to areas adjacent to public transit facilities that may
facilitate mobility needs of transit users; or support other
infrastructure investments that enhance the use of transit and other
transportation options for the community.
On June 16, 2009, U.S. DOT Secretary Ray LaHood, U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Shaun Donovan, and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson
announced a new partnership to help American families in all
communities--rural, suburban and urban--gain better access to
affordable housing, more transportation options, and lower
transportation costs. DOT, HUD, and EPA created this high-level
interagency partnership to better coordinate federal transportation,
environmental protection, and housing investments.
The Alternatives Analysis program will invest in studies that
fulfill the following six livability principles that serve as the
foundation for the DOT-HUD-EPA Partnership for Sustainable Communities:
Provide more transportation choices: Develop safe,
reliable, and economical transportation choices to decrease household
transportation costs, reduce our nation's dependence on foreign oil,
improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote public
health.
Promote equitable, affordable housing: Expand location-
and energy-efficient housing choices for people of all ages, incomes,
races and ethnicities to increase mobility and lower the combined cost
of housing and transportation.
Enhance economic competitiveness: Improve economic
competitiveness through reliable and timely access to employment
centers, educational opportunities, services and other basic needs by
workers as well as expanded business access to markets.
Support existing communities: Target Federal funding
toward existing communities--through such strategies as transit-
oriented, mixed-use development and land recycling-- to increase
community revitalization, improve the efficiency of public works
investments, and safeguard rural landscapes.
Coordinate policies and leverage investment: Align
policies and funding to remove barriers to collaboration, leverage
funding and increase the accountability and effectiveness of all levels
of government to plan for future growth, including making smart energy
choices such as locally generated renewable energy.
Value communities and neighborhoods: Enhance the unique
characteristics of all communities by investing in healthy, safe and
walkable neighborhoods--rural, urban or suburban.
II. Discretionary Program Information
A. Description and Purpose
As defined in 49 U.S.C. 5309(a)(1), an alternatives analysis is a
study conducted as part of the transportation planning process required
under Sections 5303 and 5304 which includes: (1) An assessment of a
wide range of public transportation alternatives designed to address a
transportation problem in a corridor or subarea; (2) the development of
sufficient information to enable the Secretary to make the findings of
project justification and local financial commitment required under
Section 5309; (3) the selection of a locally preferred alternative; and
(4) the adoption of the locally preferred alternative as part of the
long-range transportation plan required under Section 5303.
The funds available through this notice includes assistance to
potential sponsors of New Starts and Small Starts projects in the
evaluation of all reasonable transportation alternatives and general
alignment options to address transportation needs in a defined travel
corridor. Information about FTA's New Starts and Small Starts program
can be found on FTA's web site at https://fta.dot.gov/12347_5221.html.
FTA will invest in studies that are performed in accordance with the
mission of the Alternatives Analysis program and support the six
livability principles that serve as the foundation for the DOT-HUD-EPA
Partnership for Sustainable Communities.
FTA advises potential proposers that current provisions of the New
Starts and Small Starts program are subject to change. On January 25,
2012, FTA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that
proposes changes in the measurement of the existing statutory New
Starts and Small Starts project evaluation criteria. Additionally,
FTA's current program authorizations expire on March 31, 2012, and any
new authorizing legislation may prescribe modifications to FTA's
programs. However, the effective dates of a final rule and any new
authorizing legislation are uncertain, and the contents of either are
subject to change from current proposals. Moreover, changes to the
Federal process will not remove the need for sponsors of major transit
capital projects to assess costs and benefits of alternative project
modes and alignments. FTA therefore encourages potential sponsors of
New Starts and Small Starts projects to maintain their focus on
conducting a technically sound analysis of alternatives that evaluate
solutions to transportation problems and facilitate informed decision-
making.
B. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Proposers
Section 5339 authorizes FTA to award grants to States, authorities
of the States, metropolitan planning organizations, and local
governmental authorities to develop alternatives analyses as defined by
Section 5309(a)(1).
2. Eligible Proposals and Expenses
FTA will award available discretionary funds to eligible proposers
to conduct a new alternatives analysis or to support additional
technical tasks in an on-going alternatives analysis that will improve
and expand the information available to decision-makers considering
major transit improvements. FTA will consider proposals for all areas
of technical work that can better develop information about the costs
and benefits of potential major transit improvements. These funds are
not available for systems planning work that leads to the selection of
a particular corridor for conducting an alternatives analysis, or for
work performed after the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) has been
selected. There is no blanket pre-award authority for studies to be
funded under this notice before FTA's public announcement of the
selections.
3. Cost Sharing or Matching
The total federal share (Section 5339 funds plus other federal
funds) of the cost of studies or technical tasks selected for funding
may not exceed 80 percent. Section 5339 requests may range between
$50,000 and $2 million.
[[Page 14589]]
Funds remain available for three fiscal years, including the fiscal
year in which the award is made. FTA will not approve deferred local
share requests under this program.
C. Evaluation Criteria, Review, and Selection
1. Evaluation Criteria
The submitted proposals will be evaluated according to the
following criteria. Each proposer is encouraged to demonstrate the
responsiveness of their proposal to any and all of the selection
criteria with the most relevant information that the proposer can
provide, regardless of whether such information has been specifically
requested, or identified, in this notice. FTA will assess the extent to
which the proposal addresses each of the three criteria below.
a. Demonstrated Need
Proposers must demonstrate a need for these funds by identifying a
transportation problem in the study corridor that warrants an
evaluation of major transit improvements, including alternatives that
may be suitable for New Starts or Small Starts funding. For both new
and ongoing alternatives analyses, higher scores will be assigned to
studies in areas that have been prioritized in the metropolitan
planning process as having a significant transportation need,
particularly through inclusion of conceptual corridor improvements in
fiscally constrained long-range transportation plans. Proposals for
both new and ongoing studies must show there is a need for these funds
to support a meaningful future analysis of alternative modes and
alignments, as opposed to efforts aimed at justifying largely
predefined projects.
b. Advancing Livability
Proposers must describe the proposed study's role in broader
efforts to advance the six DOT-HUD-EPA Livability Principles. Higher
scores will be assigned to proposals that are linked to a history of
concrete actions as well as ongoing planning efforts to enhance
livability.
c. Study Approach and Outcomes
Proposers must outline a study approach that is likely to provide
decision-makers with actionable information about the costs and
benefits of investment alternatives while meaningfully involving
project stakeholders. Higher scores will be assigned to proposals that
demonstrate successful outcomes from prior alternatives analyses, a
robust public involvement plan, evidence of partnerships with related
organizations (such as housing- and environment-focused public
agencies), and demonstration of technical capacity to complete all
work.
2. Review and Selection Process
In addition to other FTA staff that may review the proposals, a
technical evaluation committee will review proposals based on the
evaluation criteria. Members of the technical evaluation committee and
other involved FTA staff reserve the right to screen the proposals and
seek clarification from any proposer about any statement in the
proposal that FTA finds ambiguous and/or request additional
documentation to be considered during the evaluation process to clarify
information contained within the proposal. After consideration of the
findings of the technical evaluation committee, the FTA Administrator
will determine the final selection and amount of funding for each
study. Geographic diversity and other discretionary awards may be
considered in FTA's award decisions. FTA expects to announce the
selected studies and notify successful proposers in August 2012.
III. Proposal and Submission Information
A. Proposal Submission Process
Proposals must be submitted electronically through https://www.GRANTS.GOV by 11:59 p.m. EDT, April 19, 2012. Mail and fax
submissions will not be accepted.
A complete proposal submission will consist of at least three
files: (1) The SF 424 Mandatory form (downloaded from GRANTS.GOV); (2)
the supplemental form found on the FTA Alternatives Analysis program
Web site: https://fta.dot.gov/alternativesanalysis; and (3) a map of the
study corridor. The supplemental form, titled Applicant and Proposal
Profile, provides guidance and a consistent format for proposers to
respond to the criteria outlined in this NOFA. Once completed, the
supplemental form and the study corridor map must be placed in the
attachments section of the SF 424 Mandatory form. Letters of support
and materials referenced in the supplemental form may also be submitted
as attachments; however, FTA will not consider narrative beyond the
text that can be accommodated within the supplemental form's character
limits.
Within 24-48 hours after submitting an electronic application, the
proposer should receive three email messages from GRANTS.GOV: (1)
Confirmation of successful transmission to GRANTS.GOV, (2) confirmation
of successful validation by GRANTS.GOV, and (3) confirmation of
successful validation by FTA. If confirmations of successful validation
are not received and a notice of failed validation or incomplete
materials is received, the proposer must address the reason for the
failed validation or incomplete materials and resubmit before the
submission deadline. If making a resubmission for any reason, include
all original attachments regardless of which attachments were updated
and check the box on the supplemental form indicating this is a
resubmission.
Complete instructions on the application process can be found at
https://www.fta.dot.gov/alternativesanalysis. Important: FTA urges
proposers to submit their applications at least 72 hours prior to the
due date to allow time to receive the validation message and to correct
any problems that may have caused a rejection notification. Submissions
after the stated submission deadline will not be accepted. GRANTS.GOV
scheduled maintenance and outage times are announced on the GRANTS.GOV
Web site https://www.GRANTS.GOV. Deadlines will not be extended due to
scheduled maintenance or outages.
B. Proposal Content
Information such as applicant name, federal amount requested, match
amount, description of areas served, etc. are requested in varying
degrees of detail on both the SF 424 Mandatory form and supplemental
``Applicant and Proposal Profile'' form. All fields are required unless
stated otherwise on the forms. Use both the ``Check Package for
Errors'' and the ``Validate Form'' validation buttons on both forms to
check all required fields on the forms. Ensure that the ``Federal''
amount identified on the SF 424 Mandatory form is the same as the
``5339 Request'' total amount calculated on the supplemental form. For
up-to-date guidance on the completion of all forms, refer to FTA's
Alternatives Analysis Web site: https://fta.dot.gov/alternativesanalysis. The supplemental form has three sections:
1. Applicant Information
This section contains basic proposer identification information:
organization legal name, FTA Recipient ID number, and transit services
provided.
[[Page 14590]]
2. Project (Study) Information
This section contains background information about the project
(study): title, proposed scope of work, map of the study corridor (map
attachment to SF 424 application is required), descriptions of the
corridor, project budget allocated into major tasks, including the
source of local match, and time-line for beginning and ending the major
tasks.
3. Evaluation Criteria
This section contains information for direct use in the evaluation
process: demonstrated need, advancing livability, and study approach
and outcomes.
C. Submission Dates and Times
Complete proposals for the Alternatives Analysis program must be
submitted electronically through GRANTS.GOV by 11:59 p.m. EDT on April
19, 2012. Proposers are encouraged to begin the process of registration
on the GRANTS.GOV site well in advance of the submission deadline.
Registration is a multi-step process, which may take several weeks to
complete before a proposal can be submitted. Registered proposers may
still be required to take steps to keep their registration up to date
before submissions can be made successfully: (1) registration in the
Central Contractor Repository (CCR) is renewed annually and (2) persons
making submissions on behalf of the Authorized Organization
Representative (AOR) must be authorized in GRANTS.GOV by the AOR to
make submissions.
IV. Award Administration
A. Award Notices
At the time the project (study) selections are announced, FTA will
extend pre-award authority for the selected projects awarded to current
grantees. There is no blanket pre-award authority for these projects
before announcement.
B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
1. Grant Requirements
If selected, applicants will apply for a grant through TEAM and
adhere to the customary FTA grant requirements of the Section 5339
Alternatives Analysis program, including those of FTA Circular 9300.1B,
Circular 5010.1D, and the labor protections of 49 U.S.C. Section
5333(b). These grants will be administered and managed by the FTA
regional offices. The Alternatives Analysis must be documented in the
Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) of the MPO for the area before
these funds can be used. All discretionary grants, regardless of award
amount, will be subject to the Congressional Notification and release
process. Technical assistance regarding these requirements is available
from each FTA regional office.
2. Standard Assurances
The applicant assures that it will comply with all applicable
Federal statutes, regulations, executive orders, FTA circulars, and
other Federal administrative requirements in carrying out any activity
supported by the FTA grant. The applicant acknowledges that it is under
a continuing obligation to comply with the terms and conditions of the
grant agreement issued for its project with FTA. The applicant
understands that Federal laws, regulations, policies, and
administrative practices might be modified from time to time and may
affect the implementation of the project. The applicant agrees that the
most recent Federal requirements will apply to the project, unless FTA
issues a written determination otherwise. The applicant must submit the
Certifications and Assurances before receiving a grant if it does not
have current certifications on file.
3. Reporting
Post-award reporting requirements include submission of Federal
Financial Reports and Milestone reports in TEAM on a quarterly basis
for all projects. Documentation is required for payment. In addition,
project sponsors receiving grants for innovative approaches may be
required to report on the performance of these approaches.
V. Agency Contacts and Technical Assistance
Contact the appropriate FTA Regional Office at https://www.fta.dot.gov for proposal-specific information and issues. For
general program information, please use the contact identified in the
front of this notice. During the application period, FTA may post
answers to commonly asked questions about the Alternatives Analysis
program at www.fta.dot.gov/alternativesanalysis.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 7th day of March, 2012.
Peter Rogoff,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-5895 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P