Safety Zone; Myrtle Beach Triathlon, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Myrtle Beach, SC, 14321-14324 [2012-5784]
Download as PDF
14321
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
aggregate of the six test sites. Are there
any other capabilities that test site
selection should include?
(E) Geographical and climatic
diversity are desirable traits for the test
site location. The FAA believes that in
addition to these traits, there are other
important factors affecting siting. These
include proximity to potential users and
availability of a suitable ground or air
transportation network. Are there other
siting characteristics of this nature that
should be considered?
(F) The FAA believes that all UAS test
site operators should be able and willing
to demonstrate their ability and
experience in conducting UAS
operations and research. Methods that
test site operators can use for that
include: providing a detailed plan of
operations (safety case, business case,
etc.); demonstrating experience in
managing and oversight of research and
development (R&D) activities; and
demonstrating the ability to mitigate
technical and operational risk. Test site
operators will also be responsible for
ensuring that approval for use of any
necessary frequency spectrum or
transmit authority has been obtained.
Are there other test site operator
requirements that should be considered?
(G) The FAA is considering utilizing
the requirements contained in 14 CFR
91.305, ‘‘No person may flight test an
aircraft except over open water, or
sparsely populated areas, having light
air traffic.’’ The FAA also published an
update to Order 8130.34A (currently
Rev B) in November 2011, which
includes language specific to flight test
areas for experimental airworthiness
operations. Should the FAA apply these
same requirements to those seeking a
UAS test site designation?
(H) The FAA must define the airspace
volume that is associated with the test
range. How should airspace volume
associated with test ranges be defined?
Additionally, the FAA must assess the
impact on NAS operational efficiency.
How should impact to NAS efficiency
be assessed?
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Conclusion
The FAA intends to utilize public
comments to meet the requirements
spelled out in NDAA (H.R. 1540) SEC
1097 UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS
AND NATIONAL AIRSPACE (a)–(d).
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 5,
2012.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–5735 Filed 3–7–12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:17 Mar 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
§ 1.417(e)–1 Restrictions and valuations of
distributions from plans subject to sections
401(a)(11) and 417.
*
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–110980–10]
RIN 1545–BJ55
Modifications to Minimum Present
Value Requirements for Partial Annuity
Distribution Options Under Defined
Benefit Pension Plans; Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correcting amendments.
AGENCY:
This document contains a
correction to the notice of proposed
rulemaking and notice of public hearing
(REG–110980–10) that was published in
the Federal Register on Friday,
February 3, 2012 (77 FR 5454),
providing guidance relating to the
minimum present value requirements
applicable to certain defined benefit
pension plans.
DATES: This correction is effective on
March 9, 2012 and is applicable on
February 3, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter J. Marks or Linda S.F. Marshall at
(202) 622–6090 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing that are the
subject of this correcting amendment are
under sections 401 and 417 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, the notice of proposed
rulemaking and notice of public hearing
(REG–110980–10) contain an error that
may prove to be misleading and is in
need of clarification.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendment:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read, in part, as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.417(e)–1 is amended
by:
Revising the last sentence of
paragraph (d)(7)(vi), Example 5 (i) to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
(d) * * *
(7) * * *
(vi) * * *
*
*
Example (5) * * *
(i) * * * Participating X elects to receive
$15,000 of the current hypothetical account
balance in the form of a single sum and to
receive the remainder of the total accrued
benefit as a life annuity.
*
*
*
*
*
LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2012–5715 Filed 3–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2012–0041]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Myrtle Beach Triathlon,
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Myrtle
Beach, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina during the
Myrtle Beach Triathlon. The Myrtle
Beach Triathlon, which is comprised of
a series of triathlon races, is scheduled
to take place on Saturday, October 13,
2012. The temporary safety zone is
necessary for the safety of race
participants, participant vessels,
spectators, and the general public
during the swim portions of the
triathlon races. Persons and vessels
would be prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 15, 2012. Requests for
public meetings must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before May 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2012–0041 using any one of the
following methods:
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
14322
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (202) 366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Ensign John R.
Santorum, Sector Charleston Office of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
telephone (843) 740–3184, email
John.R.Santorum@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2012–0041),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Mar 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2012–0041’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2012–
0041’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one on or before May 20, 2012 using
one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you
believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is the Coast Guard’s authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and
other limited access areas: 33 U.S.C.
1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–
1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Public Law
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
The purpose of the proposed rule is
to ensure the safety of race participants,
participant vessels, spectators, and the
general public during the swim portion
of the triathlon races.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
On October 13, 2012, the Myrtle
Beach Triathlon will be held in Myrtle
Beach, South Carolina. This event will
be comprised of a series of triathlon
races. Approximately 1,200 individuals
are scheduled to compete in the event.
The proposed rule would establish a
temporary safety zone around the swim
area of the Myrtle Beach Triathlon on
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The
temporary safety zone would be
enforced from 6 a.m. until 11:59 a.m. on
October 13, 2012. Persons and vessels
would be prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels
would be able to request authorization
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the safety zone by
contacting the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at (843) 740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the safety zone is granted by the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
would be required to comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative. The Coast Guard would
provide notice of the safety zone by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This
proposed rule has not been designated
a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed this
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866.
The economic impact of this proposed
rule is not significant for the following
reasons: (1) The safety zone would be
enforced for less than six hours; (2) the
safety zone would encompass only a
small portion of the navigable
waterway; (3) although persons and
vessels would not be able to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the safety zone without
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated
representative, they would be able to
operate in the surrounding area during
the enforcement period; (4) persons and
vessels would still be able to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the safety zone if authorized by
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative; and (5) the
Coast Guard would provide advance
notification of the safety zone to the
local maritime community by Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Mar 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule may affect
the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within that portion of the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway encompassed
within the safety zone from 6 a.m. to
11:59 a.m. on October 13, 2012. For the
reasons discussed in the Regulatory
Planning and Review section above, this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the proposed rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
Ensign John R. Santorum, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways
Management, Coast Guard; telephone
(843) 740–3184, email
John.R.Santorum@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14323
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
14324
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves establishing a temporary safety
zone as described in figure 2–1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, that
will be enforced for less than six hours.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Mar 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is
effective from 6 a.m. until 11:59 a.m. on
October 13, 2012.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Dated: February 28, 2012.
M.F. White,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Charleston.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0041 to
read as follows:
§ 165.T07–0041 Safety Zone; Myrtle Beach
Triathlon, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Myrtle Beach, SC.
(a) Regulated Area. The following
regulated area is a safety zone. All
waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway encompassed within an
imaginary line connecting the following
points: Starting at Point 1 in position
33°45′35″ N, 78°49′42″ W; thence
southeast to Point 2 in position
33°45′31″ N, 78°49′39″ W; thence
northeast to Point 3 in position
33°45′57″ N, 78°48′57″ W; thence
northeast to Point 4 in position
33°46′00″ N, 78°48′57″ W; thence
southwest back to origin. All
coordinates are North American Datum
1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the regulated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at (843) 740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area is granted by
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2012–5784 Filed 3–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 59
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2006–0971; FRL–9644–9]
RIN 2060–AR37
National Volatile Organic Compound
Emission Standards for Aerosol
Coatings—Addition of Dimethyl
Carbonate, Benzotrifluoride, and
Hexamethyldisiloxane to Table of
Reactivity Factors
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is proposing to
amend the National Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Standards for
Aerosol Coatings final rule, which is a
rule that establishes national reactivitybased emission standards for the aerosol
coatings category (aerosol spray paints)
under the Clean Air Act. This proposed
action adds three compounds: dimethyl
carbonate, benzotrifluoride, and
hexamethyldisiloxane and their
associated reactivity factors to the
aerosol coatings reactivity rule’s table of
reactivity factors based on petitions
received from regulated entities. This
action also revises two tables in the final
rule, and corrects a typographical error
in a test method reference. In the ‘‘Rules
and Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register, we are making these same
amendments as a direct final rule
without a prior proposed rule. If we
receive no adverse comment, we will
not take further action on this proposed
rule.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by April 23, 2012.
Public Hearing. If anyone contacts the
EPA requesting to speak at a public
hearing concerning the proposed
regulation by March 19, 2012, we will
hold a public hearing on March 26,
2012. If a public hearing is held, it will
be held at 10 a.m. at Building C on the
EPA campus in Research Triangle Park,
NC, or at an alternate site nearby.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09MRP1.SGM
09MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14321-14324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5784]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0041]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Myrtle Beach Triathlon, Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, Myrtle Beach, SC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
during the Myrtle Beach Triathlon. The Myrtle Beach Triathlon, which is
comprised of a series of triathlon races, is scheduled to take place on
Saturday, October 13, 2012. The temporary safety zone is necessary for
the safety of race participants, participant vessels, spectators, and
the general public during the swim portions of the triathlon races.
Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 15, 2012. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before May 20, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0041 using any one of the following methods:
[[Page 14322]]
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is (202) 366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Ensign John R. Santorum, Sector Charleston Office
of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email
John.R.Santorum@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0041), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2012-0041'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2012-0041'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before May 20, 2012 using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Coast Guard's
authority to establish regulated navigation areas and other limited
access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
The purpose of the proposed rule is to ensure the safety of race
participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public
during the swim portion of the triathlon races.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
On October 13, 2012, the Myrtle Beach Triathlon will be held in
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. This event will be comprised of a series
of triathlon races. Approximately 1,200 individuals are scheduled to
compete in the event.
The proposed rule would establish a temporary safety zone around
the swim area of the Myrtle Beach Triathlon on the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The temporary
safety zone would be enforced from 6 a.m. until 11:59 a.m. on October
13, 2012. Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels would be able to request
authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the safety zone by contacting the Captain of the Port Charleston by
telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF
radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone is
granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
would be required to comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative. The Coast Guard would
provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses
[[Page 14323]]
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,
and 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This proposed rule has not been designated a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this
proposed rule under Executive Order 12866.
The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for
the following reasons: (1) The safety zone would be enforced for less
than six hours; (2) the safety zone would encompass only a small
portion of the navigable waterway; (3) although persons and vessels
would not be able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the safety zone without authorization from the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative, they would be able to
operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement period; (4)
persons and vessels would still be able to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the safety zone if authorized by the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative; and (5)
the Coast Guard would provide advance notification of the safety zone
to the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small entities: The owners or operators
of vessels intending to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within that portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway encompassed
within the safety zone from 6 a.m. to 11:59 a.m. on October 13, 2012.
For the reasons discussed in the Regulatory Planning and Review section
above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact Ensign John R.
Santorum, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast
Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email John.R.Santorum@uscg.mil. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast
Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office
[[Page 14324]]
of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves establishing a temporary safety zone as described in
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, that will be
enforced for less than six hours. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
2. Add a temporary Sec. 165.T07-0041 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0041 Safety Zone; Myrtle Beach Triathlon, Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, Myrtle Beach, SC.
(a) Regulated Area. The following regulated area is a safety zone.
All waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway encompassed within an
imaginary line connecting the following points: Starting at Point 1 in
position 33[deg]45'35'' N, 78[deg]49'42'' W; thence southeast to Point
2 in position 33[deg]45'31'' N, 78[deg]49'39'' W; thence northeast to
Point 3 in position 33[deg]45'57'' N, 78[deg]48'57'' W; thence
northeast to Point 4 in position 33[deg]46'00'' N, 78[deg]48'57'' W;
thence southwest back to origin. All coordinates are North American
Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated
area.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port Charleston by telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or
a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is effective from 6 a.m. until 11:59
a.m. on October 13, 2012.
Dated: February 28, 2012.
M.F. White,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2012-5784 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P