Facility Operating License Amendment From Southern Nuclear Operating, Inc., Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, 14441-14444 [2012-5753]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Notices
This meeting will be webcast. The
webcast can be accessed by going to Art
Works blog at www.arts.gov/artworks.
If, in the course of the open session
discussion, it becomes necessary for the
Council to discuss non-public
commercial or financial information of
intrinsic value, the Council will go into
closed session pursuant to subsection
(c)(4) of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b, and in
accordance with the determination of
the Chairman of November 10, 2009.
Additionally, discussion concerning
purely personal information about
individuals, submitted with grant
applications, such as personal
biographical and salary data or medical
information, may be conducted by the
Council in closed session in accordance
with subsection (c)(6) of 5 U.S.C. 552b.
Any interested persons may attend, as
observers, Council discussions and
reviews that are open to the public. If
you need special accommodations due
to a disability, please contact the Office
of AccessAbility, National Endowment
for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682–
5532, TTY–TDD 202/682–5429, at least
seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
Further information with reference to
this meeting can be obtained from the
Office of Communications, National
Endowment for the Arts, Washington,
DC 20506, at 202/682–5570.
Dated: March 5, 2012.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Office of Guidelines and
Panel Operations.
Agenda:
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
8 a.m.–8:15 a.m. Open—Sign In
8:45 a.m.–9:15 a.m. Closed—Executive
Session
9:15 a.m.–11:45 a.m. Open—Welcome,
LIGO status, Reporting Metrices
11:45 Lunch
12:45 p.m.–2:45 p.m. Open—S6 Science
run, performance, risk reduction
3:15 p.m.–4:30 p.m. Data Management,
LIGO Australia, LSC status
5 p.m. Closed—Executive Session
Thursday, April 12, 2012
8 a.m.–8:15 a.m. Open—Sign in
9 a.m.–10 a.m. Closed—Executive Session
10:15 a.m.–11:45 Open—Review of
AdvLIGO MREFC, EPO, diversity
11:45 a.m. Lunch
12:45 p.m.–4:15 p.m. Open—Project
discussions, tour
5 p.m. Closed—Executive Session
[FR Doc. 2012–5734 Filed 3–8–12; 8:45 a.m.]
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting.
Name: LIGO Annual Review Site Visit at
Hanford Observatory for Physics, #1208.
Date and Time: Wednesday, April 11,
2012; 8 a.m.—6:30 p.m.; Thursday, April 12,
2012; 8 a.m.—5:30 p.m.; Friday, April 13,
2012; 8 a.m.—11 a.m.
Place: LIGO site at Hanford, WA.
Type of Meeting: Partially Closed.
Contact Person: Thomas Carruthers,
Program Director, Division of Physics,
National Science Foundation, (703) 292–
7373.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide an
evaluation of the project construction for
implementation of the AdvLIGO project to
the National Science Foundation.
Jkt 226001
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–348 AND 50–364; NRC–
2012–0053]
Facility Operating License Amendment
From Southern Nuclear Operating, Inc.,
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units
1 and 2
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: License amendment; request for
comment and request for a hearing.
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Submit comments by March 23,
2012. A request for a hearing must be
filed by May 8, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may access information
and comment submissions related to
this document, which the NRC
possesses and is publicly available, by
searching on https://www.regulations.gov
under Docket ID NRC–2012–0053. You
may submit comments by the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2012–0053. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–492–3668;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and
Directives Branch (RADB), Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWB–05–
B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
• Fax comments to: RADB at 301–
492–3446.
For additional direction on accessing
information and submitting comments,
DATES:
Proposal Review Panel for Physics;
Notice of Meeting
16:21 Mar 08, 2012
Dated: March 6, 2012.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–5758 Filed 3–8–12; 8:45 am]
Proposal Review Panel for Materials
Research; Notice of Meeting
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Thursday, April 19, 2012
7:45 a.m.–4:30 p.m.: Open—Review of the
MRSEC
4:30 p.m.–6:15 p.m. Closed—Executive
Session
Friday, April 20, 2012
8 a.m.–9 a.m.: Closed—Executive session
9 a.m.–10 a.m.: Open—Review of the
MRSEC
10 a.m.–3:30 p.m.: Closed—Executive
Session, Draft and Review Report
Reason for Closing: The work being
reviewed may include information of a
proprietary or confidential nature, including
technical information; financial data, such as
salaries and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the MRSEC.
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552
b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the
Sunshine Act.
Friday, April 13, 2012
8 a.m.–10:30 a.m. Closed—Executive
Session report writing
10:30 a.m.–11 a.m. Closed—Executive
Session—closing address
Reason for Closing: The proposal contains
proprietary or confidential material,
including technical information on
personnel. These matters are exempt under 5
U.S.C. 552b (c) (2) (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Dated: March 6, 2012.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–5716 Filed 3–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
14441
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463 as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Site visit review of the Materials
Research Science and Engineering Center
(MRSEC) at New York University by the
Division of Materials Research (DMR) #1203.
Dates and Times:
April 19, 2012; 7:45 a.m.–6:15 p.m.;
April 20, 2012; 8 a.m.–3:30 p.m.
Place: New York University, New York,
NY.
Type of Meeting: Part open.
Contact Person: Dr. Thomas Rieker,
Program Director, Materials Research Science
and Engineering Centers Program, Division of
Materials Research, Room 1065, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292–
4914.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and
recommendations concerning further support
of the MRSEC at New York University.
Agenda:
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
14442
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Notices
see ‘‘Accessing Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert E. Martin, Senior Project
Manager, Plant Licensing Branch 2–1,
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–1493; email:
Robert.Martin@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Accessing Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Accessing Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2012–
0053 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information regarding
this document. You may access
information related to this document,
which the NRC possesses and is
publicly available, by the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2012–0053.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
application for amendment, dated
February 28, 2012, is available
electronically under ADAMS Accession
No. ML12059A327.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2012–
0053 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure
that the NRC is able to make your
comment submission available to the
public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information in
comment submissions that you do not
want to be publicly disclosed. The NRC
posts all comment submissions at
https://www.regulations.gov as well as
enters the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not edit
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Mar 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information in
their comment submissions that they do
not want to be publicly disclosed. Your
request should state that the NRC will
not edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making
the comment submissions available to
the public or entering the comment
submissions into ADAMS.
II. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is considering issuance of an
amendment to Facility Operating
License Nos. NPF–2 and NPF–8, issued
to Southern Nuclear Operating
Company (the licensee), for operation of
the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant,
Units 1 and 2 located in Houston
County, Alabama.
The proposed amendment would
revise Technical Specification (TS)
3.5.4, ‘‘Refueling Water Storage Tank’’
(RWST) such that the non-seismically
qualified piping of the Spent Fuel Pool
(SFP) purification system may be
connected to the RWST’s seismic piping
by manual operation of a RWST
seismically qualified boundary valve
under administrative controls for
limited periods of time.
Before issuance of the proposed
license amendment, the Commission
will have made findings required by the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act) and the Commission’s
regulations.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91(a)(6) for
amendments to be granted under
exigent circumstances, the NRC staff
must determine that the amendment
request involves no significant hazards
consideration. Under the Commission’s
regulations in Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section
50.92, this means that operation of the
facility in accordance with the proposed
amendment would not (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated; (2) create the possibility of a
new or different kind of accident from
any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR
50.91(a), the licensee has provided its
analysis of the issue of no significant
hazards consideration, which is
presented below:
[Southern Nuclear Operating Company]
SNC has evaluated whether or not a
significant hazards consideration is involved
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with the proposed amendment(s) by
evaluation of the three standards set forth in
10 CFR 50.92, ‘‘Issuance of Amendment,’’ as
discussed below:
1. Does the proposed amendment involve
a significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
The use of the [Boric Acid Recovery
System] BARS system and the SFP
Purification Loop to re-circulate the RWST
does not involve any changes or create any
new interfaces with the reactor coolant
system or main steam system piping.
Therefore, the connection of the SFP
Purification Loop to the RWST and use of the
BARS system would not affect the probability
of these accidents occurring.
Neither the SFP Purification Loop nor the
BARS system are credited for safe shutdown
of the plant or accident mitigation. A
combination of design and administrative
controls ensure that both the SFP Purification
Loop and BARS systems maintain RWST
boron concentration and water volume
requirements whenever the contents of the
RWST are processed through these systems.
RWST volume margin will be verified to be
adequate to compensate for postulated BARS
system line losses and process losses which
may occur through the BARS system reject
waste stream. The BARS system is designed
to maintain a high boron recovery rate.
Potential boron dilution during use of the
BARS system is prevented through verifying
RWST boron margin prior to BARS system
operation and monitoring the BARS system
boron recovery rate by grab samples taken
from the system inlet and outlet points
approximately one hour after placing it in
service and at least every 48 hours thereafter.
Following each operation of the BARS
system, RWST sampling will be performed to
verify the RWST boron concentration, and
boron additions will be made to the RWST,
accordingly.
Since the RWST will continue to perform
its safety function and meet all surveillance
requirements, overall system performance is
not affected, assumptions previously made in
evaluating the consequences of the accident
are not altered, and the consequences of the
accident are not increased.
Therefore, the proposed change does not
involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated.
2. Does the proposed amendment create
the possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
Contingent upon manual operator action as
described above, a SFP Purification Loop line
break will not result in a loss of the RWST
safety function. Similarly, an active or
passive failure in the BARS system will not
result in loss of the RWST safety function.
Adequate RWST volume and boron margin
will be verified prior to BARS system
operation. The BARS system boron recovery
rate will be monitored by grab samples taken
of the system inlet and outlet one hour after
placing the system in service and at least
every 48 hours thereafter. In addition, the
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Documentation of Engineering Judgment]
DOEJ evaluation supports that the operator
action can be taken within sufficient time to
isolate the BARS system from the RWST
during postulated accidents.
Calculations were reviewed for potential
internal flooding from this nonseismic pipe
break, and it was concluded that the break
would have no affect on safe shutdown
equipment in the affected areas.
Therefore, the proposed change does not
create the possibility of a new or different
kind of accident from any previously
evaluated.
3. Does the proposed amendment involve
a significant reduction in a margin of safety?
Response: No.
Neither the SFP Purification Loop nor the
BARS systems are credited for safe shutdown
of the plant or accident mitigation. Adequate
RWST volume and boron margin will be
verified prior to BARS system operation and
timely operator action can be taken to isolate
the BARS system from the RWST. The BARS
system waste stream losses will also be
monitored throughout BARS system
operation.
The potential boron dilution of the RWST
inventory during tank processing through the
SFP Purification Loop is minimized by
administratively maintaining closed all
manual boundary valves within the SFP
Purification Loop while the SFP Purification
Loop is connected to the RWST. The BARS
system is designed to maintain a high boron
recovery rate, which will be verified through
testing prior to initial start up of the system.
Potential boron dilution during every
operation of the BARS system is prevented
through verification of the RWST boron
margin prior to BARS system operation,
calculating the expected rate of dilution, and
monitoring the BARS system boron recovery
rate by grab samples taken from the system
inlet and outlet at least every 48 hours.
Following operation of the BARS system,
RWST sampling will be performed to verify
the RWST boron concentration, and boron
additions to the RWST will be made
accordingly. These measures will ensure the
TS minimum RWST boron concentration is
available to mitigate the short-term
consequences of a small break LOCA, large
break LOCA, or MSLB accident.
Therefore, the proposed change does not
involve a significant reduction in a margin of
safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed the
licensee’s analysis and, based on this
review, it appears that the three
standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff
proposes to determine that the
amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration.
The Commission is seeking public
comments on this proposed
determination. Any comments received
by March 23, 2012, will be considered
in making any final determination.
Normally, the Commission will not
issue the amendment until the
expiration of the 14-day notice period.
However, should circumstances change
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Mar 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
during the notice period, such that
failure to act in a timely way would
result, for example, in derating or
shutdown of the facility, the
Commission may issue the license
amendment before the expiration of the
14-day notice period, provided that its
final determination is that the
amendment involves no significant
hazards consideration. The final
determination will consider all public
and State comments received. Should
the Commission take this action, it will
publish in the Federal Register a notice
of issuance. The Commission expects
that the need to take this action will
occur very infrequently.
III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing;
Petitions for Leave To Intervene
Within 60 days of this notice, any
person(s) whose interest may be affected
may file a request for hearing/petition to
intervene. As required by 10 CFR 2.309,
a petition for leave to intervene shall set
forth with particularity the interest of
the requestor/petitioner in the
proceeding, and how that interest may
be affected by the results of the
proceeding. The petition should
specifically explain the reasons why
intervention should be permitted with
particular reference to the following
general requirements: (1) The name,
address, and telephone number of the
requestor or petitioner; (2) the nature of
the requestor’s/petitioner’s right under
the Act to be made a party to the
proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of
the requestor’s/petitioner’s property,
financial, or other interest in the
proceeding; and (4) the possible effect of
any decision or order which may be
entered in the proceeding on the
requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The
petition must also identify the specific
contentions which the requestor/
petitioner seeks to have litigated at the
proceeding.
Each contention must consist of a
specific statement of the issue of law or
fact to be raised or controverted. In
addition, the requestor/petitioner shall
provide a brief explanation of the bases
for the contention and a concise
statement of the alleged facts or expert
opinion which support the contention
and on which the petitioner intends to
rely in proving the contention at the
hearing. The requestor/petitioner must
also provide references to those specific
sources and documents of which the
requestor/petitioner is aware and on
which the requestor/petitioner intends
to rely to establish those facts or expert
opinion. The requestor/petitioner must
provide sufficient information to show
that a genuine dispute exists with the
applicant on a material issue of law or
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14443
fact. Contentions shall be limited to
matters within the scope of the
amendment under consideration. The
contention must be one which, if
proven, would entitle the requestor/
petitioner to relief. A requestor/
petitioner who fails to satisfy these
requirements with respect to at least one
contention will not be permitted to
participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become
parties to the proceeding, subject to any
limitations in the order granting leave to
intervene, and have the opportunity to
participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing.
If a hearing is requested, the
Commission will make a final
determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration. The
final determination will serve to decide
when the hearing is held. If the final
determination is that the amendment
request involves no significant hazards
consideration, the Commission may
issue the amendment and make it
immediately effective, notwithstanding
the request for a hearing. Any hearing
held would take place after issuance of
the amendment. If the final
determination is that the amendment
request involves a significant hazards
consideration, any hearing held would
take place before the issuance of any
amendment.
IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)
All documents filed in NRC
adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave
to intervene, any motion or other
document filed in the proceeding prior
to the submission of a request for
hearing or petition to intervene, and
documents filed by interested
governmental entities participating
under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in
accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule
(72 FR 49139, August 28, 2007). The EFiling process requires participants to
submit and serve all adjudicatory
documents over the internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic
storage media. Participants may not
submit paper copies of their filings
unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures
described below.
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the
participant should contact the Office of
the Secretary by email at hearing.
docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone at 301–
415–1677, to request (1) a digital
identification (ID) certificate, which
allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
documents and access the E-Submittal
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14444
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2012 / Notices
server for any proceeding in which it is
participating; and (2) advise the
Secretary that the participant will be
submitting a request or petition for
hearing (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or
representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon
this information, the Secretary will
establish an electronic docket for the
hearing in this proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an
electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on the
NRC’s public Web site at https://www.
nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/applycertificates.html. System requirements
for accessing the E-Submittal server are
detailed in the NRC’s ‘‘Guidance for
Electronic Submission,’’ which is
available on the NRC’s public Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. Participants may
attempt to use other software not listed
on the Web site, but should note that the
NRC’s E-Filing system does not support
unlisted software, and the NRC Meta
System Help Desk will not be able to
offer assistance in using unlisted
software.
If a participant is electronically
submitting a document to the NRC in
accordance with the E-Filing rule, the
participant must file the document
using the NRC’s online, Web-based
submission form. In order to serve
documents through the Electronic
Information Exchange System, users
will be required to install a Web
browser plug-in from the NRC Web site.
Further information on the Web-based
submission form, including the
installation of the Web browser plug-in,
is available on the NRC’s public Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a
digital ID certificate and a docket has
been created, the participant can then
submit a request for hearing or petition
for leave to intervene. Submissions
should be in Portable Document Format
(PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered
complete at the time the documents are
submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing
system. To be timely, an electronic
filing must be submitted to the E-Filing
system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system
time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email
notice that provides access to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Mar 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
document to the NRC’s Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the documents on those
participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before a hearing request/
petition to intervene is filed so that they
can obtain access to the document via
the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using
the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system
may seek assistance by contacting the
NRC Meta System Help Desk through
the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located on the
NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/e-submittals.html, by email to
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call to 1–866–672–7640. The NRC
Meta System Help Desk is available
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing requesting authorization to
continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted
by: (1) First class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery
service to the Office of the Secretary,
Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, Attention: Rulemaking
and Adjudications Staff. Participants
filing a document in this manner are
responsible for serving the document on
all other participants. Filing is
considered complete by first-class mail
as of the time of deposit in the mail, or
by courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service upon depositing the
document with the provider of the
service. A presiding officer, having
granted an exemption request from
using E-Filing, may require a participant
or party to use E-Filing if the presiding
officer subsequently determines that the
reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in the NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://ehd1.
nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant
to an order of the Commission, or the
presiding officer. Participants are
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
home phone numbers in their filings,
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited
excerpts that serve the purpose of the
adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application,
participants are requested not to include
copyrighted materials in their
submission.
Petitions for leave to intervene must
be filed no later than 60 days from
March 9, 2012. Non-timely filings will
not be entertained absent a
determination by the presiding officer
that the petition or request should be
granted or the contentions should be
admitted, based on a balancing of the
factors specified in 10 CFR
2.309(c)(1)(i)–(viii).
For further details with respect to this
exigent license application, see the
application for amendment dated
February 28, 2012, which is available
for public inspection at the Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, Room O1–F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland 20852. Publicly available
documents are accessible electronically
through the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) in the NRC Library at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.
html. Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC’s PDR
reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209, or 301–415–4737, or by email
to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Attorney for licensee: M. Stanford
Blanton, Balch and Bingham Law Firm,
P.O. Box 306, Birmingham, Alabama
35201.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day
of February, 2012.
Robert E. Martin,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch II–1, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2012–5753 Filed 3–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14441-14444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5753]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-348 AND 50-364; NRC-2012-0053]
Facility Operating License Amendment From Southern Nuclear
Operating, Inc., Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: License amendment; request for comment and request for a
hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Submit comments by March 23, 2012. A request for a hearing must
be filed by May 8, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may access information and comment submissions related
to this document, which the NRC possesses and is publicly available, by
searching on https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2012-0053.
You may submit comments by the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2012-0053. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-492-
3668; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules,
Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB), Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: TWB-05-B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
Fax comments to: RADB at 301-492-3446.
For additional direction on accessing information and submitting
comments,
[[Page 14442]]
see ``Accessing Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert E. Martin, Senior Project
Manager, Plant Licensing Branch 2-1, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-
1493; email: Robert.Martin@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Accessing Information and Submitting Comments
A. Accessing Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2012-0053 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may
access information related to this document, which the NRC possesses
and is publicly available, by the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2012-0053.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The application for
amendment, dated February 28, 2012, is available electronically under
ADAMS Accession No. ML12059A327.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2012-0053 in the subject line of your
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information in comment submissions that you do not want to be publicly
disclosed. The NRC posts all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enters the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not edit comment submissions to remove identifying
or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information in their comment submissions
that they do not want to be publicly disclosed. Your request should
state that the NRC will not edit comment submissions to remove such
information before making the comment submissions available to the
public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
II. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is
considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License Nos.
NPF-2 and NPF-8, issued to Southern Nuclear Operating Company (the
licensee), for operation of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1
and 2 located in Houston County, Alabama.
The proposed amendment would revise Technical Specification (TS)
3.5.4, ``Refueling Water Storage Tank'' (RWST) such that the non-
seismically qualified piping of the Spent Fuel Pool (SFP) purification
system may be connected to the RWST's seismic piping by manual
operation of a RWST seismically qualified boundary valve under
administrative controls for limited periods of time.
Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission
will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91(a)(6) for amendments to be granted under
exigent circumstances, the NRC staff must determine that the amendment
request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the
Commission's regulations in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR), Section 50.92, this means that operation of the facility in
accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated; (2) create the possibility of a new or different
kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve
a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR
50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue of no
significant hazards consideration, which is presented below:
[Southern Nuclear Operating Company] SNC has evaluated whether
or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the
proposed amendment(s) by evaluation of the three standards set forth
in 10 CFR 50.92, ``Issuance of Amendment,'' as discussed below:
1. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The use of the [Boric Acid Recovery System] BARS system and the
SFP Purification Loop to re-circulate the RWST does not involve any
changes or create any new interfaces with the reactor coolant system
or main steam system piping. Therefore, the connection of the SFP
Purification Loop to the RWST and use of the BARS system would not
affect the probability of these accidents occurring.
Neither the SFP Purification Loop nor the BARS system are
credited for safe shutdown of the plant or accident mitigation. A
combination of design and administrative controls ensure that both
the SFP Purification Loop and BARS systems maintain RWST boron
concentration and water volume requirements whenever the contents of
the RWST are processed through these systems. RWST volume margin
will be verified to be adequate to compensate for postulated BARS
system line losses and process losses which may occur through the
BARS system reject waste stream. The BARS system is designed to
maintain a high boron recovery rate. Potential boron dilution during
use of the BARS system is prevented through verifying RWST boron
margin prior to BARS system operation and monitoring the BARS system
boron recovery rate by grab samples taken from the system inlet and
outlet points approximately one hour after placing it in service and
at least every 48 hours thereafter. Following each operation of the
BARS system, RWST sampling will be performed to verify the RWST
boron concentration, and boron additions will be made to the RWST,
accordingly.
Since the RWST will continue to perform its safety function and
meet all surveillance requirements, overall system performance is
not affected, assumptions previously made in evaluating the
consequences of the accident are not altered, and the consequences
of the accident are not increased.
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant
increase in the probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated.
2. Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new
or different kind of accident from any accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
Contingent upon manual operator action as described above, a SFP
Purification Loop line break will not result in a loss of the RWST
safety function. Similarly, an active or passive failure in the BARS
system will not result in loss of the RWST safety function. Adequate
RWST volume and boron margin will be verified prior to BARS system
operation. The BARS system boron recovery rate will be monitored by
grab samples taken of the system inlet and outlet one hour after
placing the system in service and at least every 48 hours
thereafter. In addition, the
[[Page 14443]]
[Documentation of Engineering Judgment] DOEJ evaluation supports
that the operator action can be taken within sufficient time to
isolate the BARS system from the RWST during postulated accidents.
Calculations were reviewed for potential internal flooding from
this nonseismic pipe break, and it was concluded that the break
would have no affect on safe shutdown equipment in the affected
areas.
Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility
of a new or different kind of accident from any previously
evaluated.
3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction
in a margin of safety?
Response: No.
Neither the SFP Purification Loop nor the BARS systems are
credited for safe shutdown of the plant or accident mitigation.
Adequate RWST volume and boron margin will be verified prior to BARS
system operation and timely operator action can be taken to isolate
the BARS system from the RWST. The BARS system waste stream losses
will also be monitored throughout BARS system operation.
The potential boron dilution of the RWST inventory during tank
processing through the SFP Purification Loop is minimized by
administratively maintaining closed all manual boundary valves
within the SFP Purification Loop while the SFP Purification Loop is
connected to the RWST. The BARS system is designed to maintain a
high boron recovery rate, which will be verified through testing
prior to initial start up of the system. Potential boron dilution
during every operation of the BARS system is prevented through
verification of the RWST boron margin prior to BARS system
operation, calculating the expected rate of dilution, and monitoring
the BARS system boron recovery rate by grab samples taken from the
system inlet and outlet at least every 48 hours. Following operation
of the BARS system, RWST sampling will be performed to verify the
RWST boron concentration, and boron additions to the RWST will be
made accordingly. These measures will ensure the TS minimum RWST
boron concentration is available to mitigate the short-term
consequences of a small break LOCA, large break LOCA, or MSLB
accident.
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant
reduction in a margin of safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on
this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed
determination. Any comments received by March 23, 2012, will be
considered in making any final determination.
Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the
expiration of the 14-day notice period. However, should circumstances
change during the notice period, such that failure to act in a timely
way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility,
the Commission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of
the 14-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that
the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. The final
determination will consider all public and State comments received.
Should the Commission take this action, it will publish in the Federal
Register a notice of issuance. The Commission expects that the need to
take this action will occur very infrequently.
III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing; Petitions for Leave To Intervene
Within 60 days of this notice, any person(s) whose interest may be
affected may file a request for hearing/petition to intervene. As
required by 10 CFR 2.309, a petition for leave to intervene shall set
forth with particularity the interest of the requestor/petitioner in
the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of
the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons
why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the
following general requirements: (1) The name, address, and telephone
number of the requestor or petitioner; (2) the nature of the
requestor's/petitioner's right under the Act to be made a party to the
proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the requestor's/petitioner's
property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (4) the
possible effect of any decision or order which may be entered in the
proceeding on the requestor's/petitioner's interest. The petition must
also identify the specific contentions which the requestor/petitioner
seeks to have litigated at the proceeding.
Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue
of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the
requestor/petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases for
the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or expert
opinion which support the contention and on which the petitioner
intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. The
requestor/petitioner must also provide references to those specific
sources and documents of which the requestor/petitioner is aware and on
which the requestor/petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts
or expert opinion. The requestor/petitioner must provide sufficient
information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on
a material issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be limited to
matters within the scope of the amendment under consideration. The
contention must be one which, if proven, would entitle the requestor/
petitioner to relief. A requestor/petitioner who fails to satisfy these
requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be
permitted to participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding,
subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene,
and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing.
If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final
determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The
final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held. If
the final determination is that the amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the
amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the
request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance
of the amendment. If the final determination is that the amendment
request involves a significant hazards consideration, any hearing held
would take place before the issuance of any amendment.
IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c),
must be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139,
August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit
and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not
submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the
Office of the Secretary by email at hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by
telephone at 301-415-1677, to request (1) a digital identification (ID)
certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal
[[Page 14444]]
server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise
the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a request or
petition for hearing (even in instances in which the participant, or
its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-issued digital ID
certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish
an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-certificates.html. System requirements for accessing
the E-Submittal server are detailed in the NRC's ``Guidance for
Electronic Submission,'' which is available on the NRC's public Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants
may attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but
should note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted
software, and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer
assistance in using unlisted software.
If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the
document using the NRC's online, Web-based submission form. In order to
serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange System,
users will be required to install a Web browser plug-in from the NRC
Web site. Further information on the Web-based submission form,
including the installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on
the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in
Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access
to the document to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any
others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document
via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the NRC's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email to
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call to 1-866-672-7640. The
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants
filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by
first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the
document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having
granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer
subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at
https://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the
Commission, or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to
include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers,
home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC
regulation or other law requires submission of such information. With
respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve
the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted
materials in their submission.
Petitions for leave to intervene must be filed no later than 60
days from March 9, 2012. Non-timely filings will not be entertained
absent a determination by the presiding officer that the petition or
request should be granted or the contentions should be admitted, based
on a balancing of the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)-
(viii).
For further details with respect to this exigent license
application, see the application for amendment dated February 28, 2012,
which is available for public inspection at the Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North, Room O1-F21, 11555 Rockville
Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly available
documents are accessible electronically through the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) in the NRC Library at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's PDR reference staff by
telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737, or by email to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Attorney for licensee: M. Stanford Blanton, Balch and Bingham Law
Firm, P.O. Box 306, Birmingham, Alabama 35201.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of February, 2012.
Robert E. Martin,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II-1, Division of
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2012-5753 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P