Export Sales Reporting Requirements, 13990-13993 [2012-5486]
Download as PDF
13990
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
additional resources, and the costs
imposed;
—Whether existing assistance is
meeting the needs of LEP persons;
—Whether staff know and understand
the LEP plan and how to implement
it; and
—Whether identified sources for
assistance are still available and
viable.
In addition to the five elements above,
effective plans set clear goals,
management accountability, and
opportunities for community input and
planning throughout the process.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VII. Voluntary Compliance Effort
The goal for Title VI and Title VI
regulatory enforcement is to achieve
voluntary compliance. The requirement
to provide meaningful access to LEP
persons is enforced and implemented by
USDA through its regulations at 7 CFR
part 15, Departmental Regulation 4330–
2, ‘‘Nondiscrimination in Programs and
Activities Receiving Federal Financial
Assistance From USDA,’’ and
Departmental Manual 4330–1,
‘‘Procedures for Processing
Discrimination Complaints and
Conducting Civil Rights Compliance
Reviews in USDA Assisted Programs
and Activities.’’ These documents
contain USDA requirements and
procedures for discrimination
complaints processing, complaint
investigations, compliance reviews,
efforts to secure voluntary compliance,
and technical assistance.
USDA will investigate whenever it
receives a complaint, report, or other
information that alleges or indicates
possible noncompliance with Title VI or
its regulations. If the investigation
results in a finding of compliance,
USDA will inform the recipient in
writing of this determination, including
the basis for the determination. USDA
uses voluntary mediation to resolve
most complaints. However, if a case is
fully investigated and results in a
finding of noncompliance, USDA must
inform the recipient of the
noncompliance through a Letter of
Findings that sets out the areas of
noncompliance and the steps that must
be taken to correct the noncompliance.
It must attempt to secure voluntary
compliance through informal means, if
necessary. If the matter cannot be
resolved informally, USDA must secure
compliance through the termination of
Federal assistance after the USDA
recipient has been given an opportunity
for an administrative hearing and/or by
referring the matter to DOJ to seek
injunctive relief or pursue other
enforcement proceedings. USDA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Mar 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
engages in voluntary compliance efforts
and provides technical assistance to
recipients at all stages of an
investigation. During these efforts,
USDA proposes reasonable timetables
for achieving compliance and consults
with and assists recipients in exploring
cost-effective ways of coming into
compliance. In determining a recipient’s
compliance with the Title VI
regulations, USDA’s primary concern is
to ensure that the recipient’s policies
and procedures provide meaningful
access for LEP persons to the recipient’s
programs and activities.
While all recipients must work
toward building systems that will
ensure access for LEP persons, USDA
acknowledges that the implementation
of a comprehensive system to serve LEP
persons is a process and that a system
will evolve over time as it is
implemented and periodically
reevaluated. As recipients take
reasonable steps to provide meaningful
access to federally assisted programs
and activities for LEP persons, USDA
will look favorably on intermediate
steps recipients take that are consistent
with this guidance, and that, as part of
a broader implementation plan or
schedule, move their service delivery
system toward providing full access to
LEP persons. This does not excuse
noncompliance but instead recognizes
that full compliance in all areas of a
recipient’s activities and for all potential
language minority groups might
reasonably require a series of
implementing actions over a period of
time. However, in developing any
phased implementation schedule,
USDA recipients should ensure that the
provision of appropriate assistance for
significant LEP populations or with
respect to programs or activities having
a significant impact on important
benefits, and services, are addressed
first. Recipients are encouraged to
document their efforts to provide LEP
persons with meaningful access to
federally assisted programs and
activities.
VIII. Effect on State and Local Laws
Some State and local laws might
identify language access obligations/
requirements. Recipients might meet
these obligations, as long as they do not
conflict with or set a lower standard
than is required under Title VI and Title
VI regulations. Finally, as noted above,
some recipients operate in a jurisdiction
in which English has been declared the
official language. Nonetheless, these
recipients continue to be subject to
Federal non-discrimination
requirements, including those
applicable to the provision of federally
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
assisted benefits and services to persons
with limited English proficiency.
Dated: January 30, 2012.
Thomas J. Vilsack,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–4377 Filed 3–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–9R–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary
7 CFR Part 20
RIN 0551–AA70
Export Sales Reporting Requirements
Office of the Secretary, USDA.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This proposed rule would add
reporting for pork (fresh, chilled, and
frozen box/primal cuts) and distillers
dried grain (DDG) to the Export Sales
Reporting Requirements. Under this
proposed rule, all exporters of U.S. pork
and DDG would be required to report on
a weekly basis, information on the
export sales of pork and DDGs to the
Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS).
DATES: Submit comments on or before
May 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this proposed rule to Peter
W. Burr, Branch Chief, Export Sales
Reporting Branch, Import Policies and
Export Reporting Division, Office of
Trade Programs, Foreign Agricultural
Service, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20250–1021,
STOP 1021; or by email at
Pete.Burr@fas.usda.gov; or by telephone
at (202) 720–3274; or fax to (202) 720–
0876. Persons with disabilities who
require an alternative means for
communication of information (Braille,
large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA’s Target Center at (202)
720–2600 (voice and TDD).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter W. Burr, Branch Chief, Export
Sales Reporting Branch, Import Policies
and Export Reporting Division, Office of
Trade Programs, Foreign Agricultural
Service, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20250–1021,
STOP 1021; or by email at
Pete.Burr@fas.usda.gov; or by telephone
on (202) 720–3274; or by fax (202) 720–
0876.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
In 1973, Congress mandated an export
sales reporting requirement to ensure
that all parties involved in the
production and export of U.S. grain
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
have access to up-to-date export
information. This mandate was the
result of huge, unanticipated, Soviet
purchases in 1972 of U.S. wheat and
corn that produced a sizable run-up in
U.S. food prices and depleted U.S.
reserve stocks. There was concern that
large grain companies had an advantage
in this situation because they had more
information than the public on future
prices and grain trade trends. Prior to
the establishment of the export sales
reporting system, it was difficult for the
public to obtain information on exports
until such commodities were actually
shipped.
The statutory authority for the Export
Sales Reporting Requirements, section
602 of the Agricultural Trade Act of
1978, provides for the reporting of
wheat and wheat flour, feed grains, oil
seeds, cotton, pork, beef and products
thereof, and other commodities that the
Secretary of Agriculture (the Secretary)
may designate.
This proposed rule would add
reporting for pork (fresh, chilled, and
frozen box/primal cuts) and DDGs to the
Export Sales Reporting Requirements.
Under this proposed rule, all exporters
of U.S. pork and DDGs would be
required to report weekly information
with respect to the export sales of pork
and DDGs to the Export Sales Reporting
Branch, Office of Trade Programs, FAS,
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA). Required reportable
information includes the quantity,
destination, and marketing year of all
pork and DDG export sales, changes in
sales, and shipments per parameters
identified in Appendix 1. A summary of
the ‘‘U.S. Export Sales’’ report is
published on FAS’ Web site at https://
www.fas.usda.gov/export-sales/
esrd1.html, each Thursday at 8:30 a.m.,
Eastern Time. This change would not
alter the current reporting schedule and
would be undertaken using existing staff
at no additional cost to the agency.
Adding pork and DDG to the Export
Sales Reporting Requirements would
provide an early indicator of export
sales levels for U.S. pork and DDG, thus
improving market transparency and
enabling commodity markets to better
adjust to changing export activity. This
proposed rule would allow for
information on the total volume of sales
and shipments to be available within 2
weeks of the export sale and shipment,
rather than the nearly 2-month delay
experienced under the current system
operated by the U.S. Bureau of the
Census, which only reports actual
exports.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Mar 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
Executive Order 12866
The proposed rule has been
determined to be significant under
Executive Order 12866 and has been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
ensures that regulatory and information
requirements are tailored to the size and
nature of small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions. This proposed rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on small businesses.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,’’ requires consultation with
state and local officials. The objectives
of the Executive Order are to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism, by relying on
state and local processes for state and
local government coordination and
review of proposed federal financial
assistance and direct federal
development. This rule neither provides
federal financial assistance nor direct
federal development; it does not provide
either grants or cooperative agreements.
Therefore this program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988. The
provisions of this proposed rule would
not have a preemptive effect with
respect to any state or local laws,
regulations, or policies which conflict
with such provision or which otherwise
impede their full implementation. The
proposed rule would not have a
retroactive effect. Before any judicial
action may be brought forward
regarding this proposed rule, all
administrative remedies must be
exhausted.
Executive Order 13132
The policies contained in this rule
would not have any substantial direct
effect on states, on the relationship
between the national government and
the states, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor
would this rule impose substantial
direct compliance costs on state and
local governments. Therefore,
consultation with the states is not
required.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed for
compliance with Executive Order
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13991
13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments.’’ This
Executive Order imposes requirements
on the development of regulatory
policies that have Tribal implications or
preempt tribal laws. The policies
contained in this rule do not preempt
Tribal law.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Administrator has determined
that this action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Therefore, neither
an Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
necessary for this proposed rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(Pub. L. 104–4)
Public Law 104–4 requires
consultation with state and local
officials and Indian tribal governments.
This proposed rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate or any other
requirement on state, local, or tribal
governments. Accordingly, these
requirements are not subject to the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act.
Executive Order 12630
This Order requires careful evaluation
of governmental actions that interfere
with constitutionally protected property
rights. This proposed rule would not
interfere with any property rights and,
therefore, does not need to be evaluated
on the basis of the criteria outlined in
Executive Order 12630.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Secretary is requesting
comments from all interested
individuals and organizations on a
proposed revision to the currently
approved information collection for this
program. This revision includes the
proposed change in information
collection activities related to the
regulatory changes in this proposed
rule.
Comment Date
Comments on this information
collection must be received by May 7,
2012 to be assured of consideration.
Additional Information or Comments
Peter W. Burr, Office of Trade
Programs/Import Policies and Export
Reporting Division/Export Sales
Reporting Branch, FAS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, Stop 1025, SW.,
Washington, DC 20520–1025; or by
email at: esr@fas.usda.gov; or to the
Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
13992
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
Washington, DC 20503.
Title: Export Sales (Reporting
Program) of U.S. Agricultural
Commodities.
OMB Number: 0551–0007.
Expiration Date of Approval: January
31, 2014.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: Section 602 of the
Agricultural Trade Act of 1978, as
amended, (7 U.S.C. 5712) requires the
reporting of information pertaining to
contracts for export sale of certain
specified agricultural commodities and
other commodities that may be
designated by the Secretary. The
Secretary of Agriculture has the
authority to add other commodities to
this list. This proposed rule would add
reporting for pork and DDGs to the
Export Sales Reporting Requirements.
Regulations at 7 CFR part 20 implement
the reporting requirements, and
prescribe a system for reporting
information pertaining to contracts for
export sales.
USDA’s Export Sales Reporting
System was created after the large
unexpected purchase of U.S. wheat and
corn by the Soviet Union in 1972. To
make sure that all parties involved in
the production and export of U.S. grain
have access to up-to-date export
information, the U.S. Congress
mandated an export sales reporting
requirement in 1973. Prior to the
establishment of the Export Sales
Reporting System, it was difficult for the
public to obtain information on export
sales activity until the actual shipments
had taken place.
Estimate of Burden: The average
burden, including the time for
reviewing instructions, gathering data
needed, completing forms, and record
keeping is estimated to be 30 minutes.
Respondents: All exporters of wheat
and wheat flour, feed grains, oilseeds,
cotton, rice, cattle hides and skins, beef,
pork, and any products thereof, and
other commodities that the Secretary
may designate as produced in the
United States.
Estimated number of respondents:
360.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 252.37.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 45,427.
Requests for Comments: Send
comments regarding (a) whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Persons with disabilities who require
an alternative means of communication
of information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s
Target Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice
and TDD). All responses to this notice
will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All
comments also will become a matter of
public record.
E-Government Act Compliance
FAS is committed to compliance with
the E-Government Act, which requires
Government agencies, in general, to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Wheat—Hard red winter ....................................................................................
Wheat—Soft red winter .....................................................................................
Wheat—Hard red Spring ...................................................................................
Wheat—White (incl. Hard and soft white) .........................................................
Wheat—Durum ..................................................................................................
Wheat—Products—All wheat flours (including clears) bulgur, semolina, farina, and rolled, cracked and crushed wheat.
Barley—Unmilled (including feed and hull-less waxy barley) ...........................
Corn—Unmilled (including waxy, cracked—if 50% whole kernels) ..................
Distillers Dried Grain ..........................................................................................
Rye—Unmilled ...................................................................................................
Oats—Unmilled ..................................................................................................
Grain Sorghum—Unmilled .................................................................................
Soybeans ...........................................................................................................
Soybean Cake and Meal ...................................................................................
14:34 Mar 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Agricultural commodities, Exports,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, 7 CFR part 20 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 20—EXPORT SALES
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. The authority citation for part 20
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 5712.
2. Section 20.4 is amended by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 20.4
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Commodity. Wheat and wheat
flour, feed grains, oilseeds, cotton, rice,
cattle hides and skins, beef, pork, and
any products thereof, and any other
agricultural commodity the Secretary
may designate. ‘‘Commodity’’ shall also
mean a commodity having identifying
characteristics as described in any
announcement issued pursuant to § 20.5
such as class(es) of wheat and rice, or
staple length(s) of cotton. Mixed wheat
shall be considered to be the
predominant wheat class of the blend.
This definition excludes commodities to
be used for seed which have been
treated in such a manner that their use
is limited to seed for planting purposes
or on which a certificate has been issued
by a recognized seed testing laboratory
setting forth variety, germination, and
purity.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Appendix 1 to part 20 is revised to
read as follows:
Appendix 1 to Part 20—Commodities
Subject to Reporting, Units of Measure
to be Used in Reporting, and Beginning
and Ending Dates of Marketing Years
Unit of measure to be
used in reporting
Commodity to be reported
VerDate Mar<15>2010
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 20
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Beginning of
marketing year
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
June
June
June
June
June
June
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
June 1 .............................
Sept. 1 ............................
Sept. 1 ............................
June 1 .............................
June 1 .............................
Sept. 1 ............................
Sept. 1 ............................
Oct. 1 ..............................
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
End of
marketing
year
May
May
May
May
May
May
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
May 31.
Aug. 31.
Aug. 31.
May 31.
May 31.
Aug. 31.
Aug. 31.
Sept. 30.
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Proposed Rules
13993
Commodity to be reported
Unit of measure to be
used in reporting
Beginning of
marketing year
End of
marketing
year
Soybean Oil—including: Crude (including degummed), once refined, soybean
salad oil (including refined and further processed by bleaching, deodorizing or winterizing), hydro-genated, packaged oil.
Flaxseed ............................................................................................................
Linseed Oil—including raw, boiled ....................................................................
Cottonseed .........................................................................................................
Cottonseed Cake and Meal ...............................................................................
Cottonseed Oil—including crude, once refined, cottonseed salad oil (refined
and further processed by bleaching, deodorizing or winterizing), hydrogenated.
Sunflowerseed Oil—crude, once refined, sunflowerseed salad oil (refined
and further processed by bleaching, deodorizing or winterizing), hydrogenated.
Cotton—American Pima—Raw, extra long staple ............................................
Cotton—Upland—Raw, staple length 11⁄16 inches and over ............................
Cotton—Upland—Raw, staple length 1 inch up to 11⁄16 inches .......................
Cotton—Upland—Raw, staple length under 1 inch ..........................................
Rice—Long grain, rough (including parboiled) ..................................................
Rice—Medium, short and other classes, rough (including parboiled) ..............
Rice—Long grain, brown (including parboiled) .................................................
Rice—Medium, short and other classes, brown (including parboiled) ..............
Rice—Long grain, milled (including parboiled) ..................................................
Rice—Medium, short and other classes, milled (including parboiled, brewer’s
rice).
Cattle Hides and Skins—Whole cattle hides, (excluding wet blues) ................
Cattle Hides and Skins—Whole calf skins (excluding wet blues) .....................
Cattle Hides and Skins—Whole kip skins, (excluding wet blues) .....................
Cattle Hides and Skins—Cattle, calf, and kip cut into croupons, crops,
dossets, sides, butts and butt bend (hide equivalent) (excluding wet blues).
Cattle Hides and Skins—Cattle, calf and kip, in cuts not otherwise specified;
pickled/limed (excluding wet blues).
Cattle, calf and kip, Wet blues—unsplit (whole or sided) hide equivalent ........
Cattle, calf and kip, Wet blues—grain splits (whole or sided) hide equivalent
Cattle, calf and kip, Wet blues—splits, (excluding grain splits) ........................
Beef—fresh, chilled or frozen muscle cuts/whether or not boxed ....................
Pork—fresh, chilled or frozen muscle cuts/whether or not boxed ....................
Metric Tons .....................
Oct. 1 ..............................
Sept. 30.
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
Metric
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
June 1 .............................
June 1 .............................
Aug. 1 .............................
Oct. 1 ..............................
Oct. 1 ..............................
May 31.
May 31.
July 31.
Sept. 30.
Sept. 30.
Metric Tons .....................
Oct. 1 ..............................
Sept. 30.
Running Bales ................
Running Bales ................
Running Bales ................
Running Bales ................
Metric Tons .....................
Metric Tons .....................
Metric Tons .....................
Metric Tons .....................
Metric Tons .....................
Metric Tons .....................
Aug.
Aug.
Aug.
Aug.
Aug.
Aug.
Aug.
Aug.
Aug.
Aug.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
July
July
July
July
July
July
July
July
July
July
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
Pieces .............................
Pieces .............................
Pieces .............................
Number ...........................
Jan.
Jan.
Jan.
Jan.
1
1
1
1
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
31.
31.
31.
31.
Pounds ............................
Jan. 1 ..............................
Dec. 31.
Number ...........................
Number ...........................
Pounds ............................
Metric tons ......................
Metric tons ......................
Jan.
Jan.
Jan.
Jan.
Jan.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Dated: January 10, 2012.
Suzanne E. Heinen,
Acting Administrator, Foreign Agricultural
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–5486 Filed 3–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0221; Directorate
Identifier 2010–SW–082–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Airworthiness Directives; Spectrolab
Nightsun XP Searchlight
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for a
certain Spectrolab Nightsun XP
Searchlight Assembly (searchlight)
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:34 Mar 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
installed on, but not limited to, Agusta
S.p.A. (Agusta) Model AB139 and
Model AW139 helicopters, Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model
S–92A helicopters, and Eurocopter
Deutschland GmbH (Eurocopter) Model
EC135 and Model MBB–BK 117 C–2
helicopters. This proposed AD would
require, before further flight, inserting
information into the Normal Procedures
section of the Rotorcraft Flight Manual
(RFM), a daily check of the searchlight,
and at a specified time interval or if you
find certain conditions, modifying any
affected searchlight gimbal assembly.
This proposed AD is prompted by a
report of a searchlight vibrating and an
investigation that revealed that the
gimbal azimuth top nut was loose. A
loose nut, if not detected and corrected,
could result in a gap between the rubber
edging of the top shroud and the gimbal
frame, leading to degredation of
pointing accuracy and stability
performance of the searchlight, and
excessive vibration. If the nut were to
entirely disengage, the searchlight could
disconnect partially or totally from the
helicopter, resulting in damage to the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1
1
1
1
1
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
31.
31.
31.
31.
31.
helicopter and injury to persons on the
ground.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may
examine the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov or in
person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the economic evaluation, any
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13990-13993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5486]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary
7 CFR Part 20
RIN 0551-AA70
Export Sales Reporting Requirements
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would add reporting for pork (fresh,
chilled, and frozen box/primal cuts) and distillers dried grain (DDG)
to the Export Sales Reporting Requirements. Under this proposed rule,
all exporters of U.S. pork and DDG would be required to report on a
weekly basis, information on the export sales of pork and DDGs to the
Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS).
DATES: Submit comments on or before May 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this proposed rule to Peter
W. Burr, Branch Chief, Export Sales Reporting Branch, Import Policies
and Export Reporting Division, Office of Trade Programs, Foreign
Agricultural Service, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20250-1021, STOP 1021; or by email at Pete.Burr@fas.usda.gov; or by
telephone at (202) 720-3274; or fax to (202) 720-0876. Persons with
disabilities who require an alternative means for communication of
information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA's Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter W. Burr, Branch Chief, Export
Sales Reporting Branch, Import Policies and Export Reporting Division,
Office of Trade Programs, Foreign Agricultural Service, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-1021, STOP 1021; or by
email at Pete.Burr@fas.usda.gov; or by telephone on (202) 720-3274; or
by fax (202) 720-0876.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In 1973, Congress mandated an export sales reporting requirement to
ensure that all parties involved in the production and export of U.S.
grain
[[Page 13991]]
have access to up-to-date export information. This mandate was the
result of huge, unanticipated, Soviet purchases in 1972 of U.S. wheat
and corn that produced a sizable run-up in U.S. food prices and
depleted U.S. reserve stocks. There was concern that large grain
companies had an advantage in this situation because they had more
information than the public on future prices and grain trade trends.
Prior to the establishment of the export sales reporting system, it was
difficult for the public to obtain information on exports until such
commodities were actually shipped.
The statutory authority for the Export Sales Reporting
Requirements, section 602 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978,
provides for the reporting of wheat and wheat flour, feed grains, oil
seeds, cotton, pork, beef and products thereof, and other commodities
that the Secretary of Agriculture (the Secretary) may designate.
This proposed rule would add reporting for pork (fresh, chilled,
and frozen box/primal cuts) and DDGs to the Export Sales Reporting
Requirements. Under this proposed rule, all exporters of U.S. pork and
DDGs would be required to report weekly information with respect to the
export sales of pork and DDGs to the Export Sales Reporting Branch,
Office of Trade Programs, FAS, United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA). Required reportable information includes the quantity,
destination, and marketing year of all pork and DDG export sales,
changes in sales, and shipments per parameters identified in Appendix
1. A summary of the ``U.S. Export Sales'' report is published on FAS'
Web site at https://www.fas.usda.gov/export-sales/esrd1.html, each
Thursday at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Time. This change would not alter the
current reporting schedule and would be undertaken using existing staff
at no additional cost to the agency.
Adding pork and DDG to the Export Sales Reporting Requirements
would provide an early indicator of export sales levels for U.S. pork
and DDG, thus improving market transparency and enabling commodity
markets to better adjust to changing export activity. This proposed
rule would allow for information on the total volume of sales and
shipments to be available within 2 weeks of the export sale and
shipment, rather than the nearly 2-month delay experienced under the
current system operated by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, which only
reports actual exports.
Executive Order 12866
The proposed rule has been determined to be significant under
Executive Order 12866 and has been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act ensures that regulatory and
information requirements are tailored to the size and nature of small
businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
This proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on small
businesses.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,'' requires consultation with state and local officials. The
objectives of the Executive Order are to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened federalism, by relying on state and
local processes for state and local government coordination and review
of proposed federal financial assistance and direct federal
development. This rule neither provides federal financial assistance
nor direct federal development; it does not provide either grants or
cooperative agreements. Therefore this program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988.
The provisions of this proposed rule would not have a preemptive effect
with respect to any state or local laws, regulations, or policies which
conflict with such provision or which otherwise impede their full
implementation. The proposed rule would not have a retroactive effect.
Before any judicial action may be brought forward regarding this
proposed rule, all administrative remedies must be exhausted.
Executive Order 13132
The policies contained in this rule would not have any substantial
direct effect on states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor would this
rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments. Therefore, consultation with the states is not required.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed for compliance with Executive Order
13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments.'' This Executive Order imposes requirements on the
development of regulatory policies that have Tribal implications or
preempt tribal laws. The policies contained in this rule do not preempt
Tribal law.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Administrator has determined that this action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is necessary for this proposed rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Pub. L. 104-4)
Public Law 104-4 requires consultation with state and local
officials and Indian tribal governments. This proposed rule does not
impose an unfunded mandate or any other requirement on state, local, or
tribal governments. Accordingly, these requirements are not subject to
the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Executive Order 12630
This Order requires careful evaluation of governmental actions that
interfere with constitutionally protected property rights. This
proposed rule would not interfere with any property rights and,
therefore, does not need to be evaluated on the basis of the criteria
outlined in Executive Order 12630.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Secretary is requesting comments from all interested
individuals and organizations on a proposed revision to the currently
approved information collection for this program. This revision
includes the proposed change in information collection activities
related to the regulatory changes in this proposed rule.
Comment Date
Comments on this information collection must be received by May 7,
2012 to be assured of consideration.
Additional Information or Comments
Peter W. Burr, Office of Trade Programs/Import Policies and Export
Reporting Division/Export Sales Reporting Branch, FAS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, Stop 1025, SW., Washington, DC 20520-1025; or by
email at: esr@fas.usda.gov; or to the Desk Officer for Agriculture,
Office of
[[Page 13992]]
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
Washington, DC 20503.
Title: Export Sales (Reporting Program) of U.S. Agricultural
Commodities.
OMB Number: 0551-0007.
Expiration Date of Approval: January 31, 2014.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: Section 602 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978, as
amended, (7 U.S.C. 5712) requires the reporting of information
pertaining to contracts for export sale of certain specified
agricultural commodities and other commodities that may be designated
by the Secretary. The Secretary of Agriculture has the authority to add
other commodities to this list. This proposed rule would add reporting
for pork and DDGs to the Export Sales Reporting Requirements.
Regulations at 7 CFR part 20 implement the reporting requirements, and
prescribe a system for reporting information pertaining to contracts
for export sales.
USDA's Export Sales Reporting System was created after the large
unexpected purchase of U.S. wheat and corn by the Soviet Union in 1972.
To make sure that all parties involved in the production and export of
U.S. grain have access to up-to-date export information, the U.S.
Congress mandated an export sales reporting requirement in 1973. Prior
to the establishment of the Export Sales Reporting System, it was
difficult for the public to obtain information on export sales activity
until the actual shipments had taken place.
Estimate of Burden: The average burden, including the time for
reviewing instructions, gathering data needed, completing forms, and
record keeping is estimated to be 30 minutes.
Respondents: All exporters of wheat and wheat flour, feed grains,
oilseeds, cotton, rice, cattle hides and skins, beef, pork, and any
products thereof, and other commodities that the Secretary may
designate as produced in the United States.
Estimated number of respondents: 360.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 252.37.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 45,427.
Requests for Comments: Send comments regarding (a) whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Persons with disabilities who require an alternative means of
communication of information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.)
should contact USDA's Target Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All comments also will become a matter of
public record.
E-Government Act Compliance
FAS is committed to compliance with the E-Government Act, which
requires Government agencies, in general, to provide the public the
option of submitting information or transacting business electronically
to the maximum extent possible.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 20
Agricultural commodities, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part
20 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 20--EXPORT SALES REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. The authority citation for part 20 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 5712.
2. Section 20.4 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 20.4 Definitions.
* * * * *
(c) Commodity. Wheat and wheat flour, feed grains, oilseeds,
cotton, rice, cattle hides and skins, beef, pork, and any products
thereof, and any other agricultural commodity the Secretary may
designate. ``Commodity'' shall also mean a commodity having identifying
characteristics as described in any announcement issued pursuant to
Sec. 20.5 such as class(es) of wheat and rice, or staple length(s) of
cotton. Mixed wheat shall be considered to be the predominant wheat
class of the blend. This definition excludes commodities to be used for
seed which have been treated in such a manner that their use is limited
to seed for planting purposes or on which a certificate has been issued
by a recognized seed testing laboratory setting forth variety,
germination, and purity.
* * * * *
3. Appendix 1 to part 20 is revised to read as follows:
Appendix 1 to Part 20--Commodities Subject to Reporting, Units of
Measure to be Used in Reporting, and Beginning and Ending Dates of
Marketing Years
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unit of measure to be Beginning of marketing End of marketing
Commodity to be reported used in reporting year year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wheat--Hard red winter................. Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
Wheat--Soft red winter................. Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
Wheat--Hard red Spring................. Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
Wheat--White (incl. Hard and soft Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
white).
Wheat--Durum........................... Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
Wheat--Products--All wheat flours Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
(including clears) bulgur, semolina,
farina, and rolled, cracked and
crushed wheat.
Barley--Unmilled (including feed and Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
hull-less waxy barley).
Corn--Unmilled (including waxy, Metric Tons............. Sept. 1................. Aug. 31.
cracked--if 50% whole kernels).
Distillers Dried Grain................. Metric Tons............. Sept. 1................. Aug. 31.
Rye--Unmilled.......................... Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
Oats--Unmilled......................... Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
Grain Sorghum--Unmilled................ Metric Tons............. Sept. 1................. Aug. 31.
Soybeans............................... Metric Tons............. Sept. 1................. Aug. 31.
Soybean Cake and Meal.................. Metric Tons............. Oct. 1.................. Sept. 30.
[[Page 13993]]
Soybean Oil--including: Crude Metric Tons............. Oct. 1.................. Sept. 30.
(including degummed), once refined,
soybean salad oil (including refined
and further processed by bleaching,
deodorizing or winterizing), hydro-
genated, packaged oil.
Flaxseed............................... Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
Linseed Oil--including raw, boiled..... Metric Tons............. June 1.................. May 31.
Cottonseed............................. Metric Tons............. Aug. 1.................. July 31.
Cottonseed Cake and Meal............... Metric Tons............. Oct. 1.................. Sept. 30.
Cottonseed Oil--including crude, once Metric Tons............. Oct. 1.................. Sept. 30.
refined, cottonseed salad oil (refined
and further processed by bleaching,
deodorizing or winterizing),
hydrogenated.
Sunflowerseed Oil--crude, once refined, Metric Tons............. Oct. 1.................. Sept. 30.
sunflowerseed salad oil (refined and
further processed by bleaching,
deodorizing or winterizing),
hydrogenated.
Cotton--American Pima--Raw, extra long Running Bales........... Aug. 1.................. July 31.
staple.
Cotton--Upland--Raw, staple length 1\1/ Running Bales........... Aug. 1.................. July 31.
16\ inches and over.
Cotton--Upland--Raw, staple length 1 Running Bales........... Aug. 1.................. July 31.
inch up to 1\1/16\ inches.
Cotton--Upland--Raw, staple length Running Bales........... Aug. 1.................. July 31.
under 1 inch.
Rice--Long grain, rough (including Metric Tons............. Aug. 1.................. July 31.
parboiled).
Rice--Medium, short and other classes, Metric Tons............. Aug. 1.................. July 31.
rough (including parboiled).
Rice--Long grain, brown (including Metric Tons............. Aug. 1.................. July 31.
parboiled).
Rice--Medium, short and other classes, Metric Tons............. Aug. 1.................. July 31.
brown (including parboiled).
Rice--Long grain, milled (including Metric Tons............. Aug. 1.................. July 31.
parboiled).
Rice--Medium, short and other classes, Metric Tons............. Aug. 1.................. July 31.
milled (including parboiled, brewer's
rice).
Cattle Hides and Skins--Whole cattle Pieces.................. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
hides, (excluding wet blues).
Cattle Hides and Skins--Whole calf Pieces.................. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
skins (excluding wet blues).
Cattle Hides and Skins--Whole kip Pieces.................. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
skins, (excluding wet blues).
Cattle Hides and Skins--Cattle, calf, Number.................. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
and kip cut into croupons, crops,
dossets, sides, butts and butt bend
(hide equivalent) (excluding wet
blues).
Cattle Hides and Skins--Cattle, calf Pounds.................. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
and kip, in cuts not otherwise
specified; pickled/limed (excluding
wet blues).
Cattle, calf and kip, Wet blues-- Number.................. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
unsplit (whole or sided) hide
equivalent.
Cattle, calf and kip, Wet blues--grain Number.................. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
splits (whole or sided) hide
equivalent.
Cattle, calf and kip, Wet blues-- Pounds.................. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
splits, (excluding grain splits).
Beef--fresh, chilled or frozen muscle Metric tons............. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
cuts/whether or not boxed.
Pork--fresh, chilled or frozen muscle Metric tons............. Jan. 1.................. Dec. 31.
cuts/whether or not boxed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: January 10, 2012.
Suzanne E. Heinen,
Acting Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-5486 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P