Notice of Proposed NPDES General Permit; Proposed NPDES General Permit for New and Existing Sources and New Dischargers in the Offshore Subcategory of the Oil and Gas Extraction Category for the Western Portion of the Outer Continental Shelf of the Gulf of Mexico (GMG290000), 13601-13603 [2012-5534]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 7, 2012 / Notices
2. Registration Number: 100–811.
Docket Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–
0045. Company name and address:
Syngenta Crop Protection, P.O. Box
18300, Greensboro, NC 27409. Active
ingredient: cyprodinil. Proposed Use:
leafy vegetables (except Brassica).
Contact: Lisa Jones, Registration
Division, (703) 308–9424, jones.lisa@
epa.gov.
3. Registration Number: 100–828.
Docket Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–
0045. Company name and address:
Syngenta Crop Protection, P.O. Box
18300, Greensboro, NC 27409. Active
ingredient: Cyprodinil. Proposed Use:
Cardoon, celery, Chinese celery, celtuce,
Florence fennel, New Zealand spinach,
rhubarb, spinach, spinach vine, swiss
chard. Contact: Lisa Jones, Registration
Division, (703) 308–9424, jones.lisa@
epa.gov.
4. Registration Number: 100–953.
Docket Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–
0046. Company name and address:
Syngenta Crop Protection, P.O. Box
18300, Greensboro, NC 27409. Active
ingredients: Cyprodinil and Fludioxonil.
Proposed Use: Cardoon, celery, chinese
celery, celtuce, Florence fennel, New
Zealand spinach, Rhubarb, spinach,
spinach vine, swiss chard. Contact: Lisa
Jones, Registration Division, (703) 308–
9424, jones.lisa@epa.gov.
5. Registration Number: 100–999,
100–1014. Docket Number: EPA–HQ–
OPP–2012–0085. Company name and
address: Syngenta Crop Protection, P.O.
Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419–
8300. Active ingredient: Paclobutrazol.
Proposed Use: Seed treatment for
broccoli, cauliflower, and cabbage.
Contact: Dominic Schuler, Registration
Division, (703) 347–0260, schuler.
dominic@epa.gov.
6. Registration Numbers: 352–844,
352–729, 352–728. Docket Number:
EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0029. Company
name and address: DuPont Crop
Protection, Stine-Haskell Research
Center, P.O. Box 30, Newark, DE 19714.
Active ingredient: Chlorantraniliprole.
Proposed Uses: Soybean, Oilseed Crop
Group. Contact: Jennifer Urbanski,
Registration Division, (703) 347–0156,
urbanski.jennifer@epa.gov.
7. Registration Numbers: 10163–282,
10163–283. Docket Number: EPA–HQ–
OPP–2011–1011. Company name and
address: Gowan Company, 370 S. Main
Street, Yuma, AZ 85364. Active
ingredient: EPTC. Proposed Use:
Watermelon; Crop Group 10–10–Citrus
Fruit Group; Sunflower subgroup 20B.
Contact: Emily Hartman, Registration
Division, (703) 347–0189, hartman.
emily@epa.gov.
8. Registration Number: 42750–85,
42750–169. Docket Number: EPA–HQ–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Mar 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
OPP–2012–0010. Company name and
address: Albaugh Inc., 1525 NE 36th St.,
Ankeny, IA 50021. Active ingredient:
Quinclorac. Proposed Uses: Rhubarb
and berry, low growing, except
strawberry, subgroup 13–07H. Contact:
Maggie Rudick, Registration Division,
(703) 347–0257, rudick.maggie@epa.
gov.
9. Registration Numbers: 59639–173,
59639–150, 59639–152. Docket Number:
EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0860. Company
name and address: Valent, U.S.A. Corp,
P.O. Box 8025, Walnut Creek, CA
94596–8025. Active ingredient:
Clothianidin. Proposed Use: Strawberry;
Crop Group 10–10, Citrus Fruit Group;
citrus dried pulp; pistachio; tea.
Contact: Marianne Lewis, Registration
Division, (703) 308–8043, lewis.
marianne@epa.gov.
10. Registration Number: 71512–2,
71512–3. Docket Number: EPA–HQ–
OPP–2011–0906. Company name and
address: ISK Biosciences Corporation,
7470 Auburn Rd., Suite A, Concord, OH
44077. Active ingredient: Cyazofamid.
Proposed Use: Succulent bean, shelled
succulent bean, leafy greens, basil (fresh
and dry), tuberous and corm vegetables,
fruiting vegetables. Contact: Dominic
Schuler, Registration Division, (703)
347–0260, schuler.dominic@epa.gov.
11. Registration Numbers: 66330–38,
66330–39. Docket Number: EPA–HQ–
OPP–2011–0449. Company name and
address: Arysta LifeScience North
America LLC, 15401 Weston Parkway,
Suite 150, Cary, NC 27513. Active
ingredient: Acequinocyl. Proposed Uses:
Succulent soybean (edamame); small
fruit and berry subgroups 13–07 A, F,
and G; succulent bean; cowpea forage;
melon subgroup 9A; cucumber; cherry.
Contact: Autumn Metzger, Registration
Division, (703) 305–5314, metzger.
autumn@epa.gov.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pest.
Dated: February 14, 2012.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012–5265 Filed 3–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13601
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9644–4]
Notice of Proposed NPDES General
Permit; Proposed NPDES General
Permit for New and Existing Sources
and New Dischargers in the Offshore
Subcategory of the Oil and Gas
Extraction Category for the Western
Portion of the Outer Continental Shelf
of the Gulf of Mexico (GMG290000)
Summary: The Regional
Administrator of Region 6 today
proposes to reissue the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Permit No.
GMG290000 for existing and new
sources and new dischargers in the
Offshore Subcategory of the Oil and Gas
Extraction Point Source Category (40
CFR Part 435, Subpart A), located in and
discharging to the Outer Continental
Shelf offshore of Louisiana and Texas.
The discharge of produced water to that
portion of the Outer Continental Shelf
from Offshore Subcategory facilities
located in the territorial seas of
Louisiana and Texas is also authorized
by this permit.
This draft permit proposes to retain,
with certain modifications, the
limitations and conditions of the
existing 2007 issued permit (2007
permit). The 2007 permit limitations
conform with the Oil and Gas Offshore
Subcategory Guidelines and contain
additional requirements to assess
impacts from the discharge of produced
water to the marine environment, as
required by section 403(c) of the Clean
Water Act.
The following major changes to the
2007 permit are proposed as part of the
permit reissuance: (1) Define operators
for the purpose of this permit, (2) delete
New Source Exemption language, (3)
add toxicity test requirement for hydrate
control fluids, (4) add spill prevention
best management practices provision,
(5) authorize de minimis discharges
caused by subsea safety valve testing, (6)
require electronic Notice of Intent (NOI)
and discharge monitoring reporting
(NetDMR), and (7) establish updated
critical dilutions for whole effluent
toxicity (WET) limitations for produced
water.
Addresses: Comments should be sent
to: Ms. Diane Smith, Water Quality
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Comments may be sent electronically to
smith.diane@epa.gov.
Dates: Comments must be received by
May 7, 2012. Public meetings and
hearings on the proposed permit will be
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
13602
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 7, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
held at the times and places below. The
meetings will include a presentation on
the proposed permit followed by the
opportunity for questions and answers.
The public hearings will be held in
accordance with the requirements of 40
CFR 124.12. At the public hearing, any
person may submit oral or written
statements and data concerning the
proposed permit. Any person who
cannot attend one of the public hearings
may still submit written comments,
which have the same weight as
comments made at the public hearing,
through the end of the public comment
period.
Date: April 11, 2012.
Time: 6 p.m.–7:30 p.m. for public
meeting and 7:30 p.m.–9 p.m. for public
hearing.
Place: Houston Marriott South Hobby
Airport, Galveston Room, 9100 Gulf
Freeway, Houston, TX 77017.
Date: April 12, 2012.
Time: 5:30 p.m.–7 p.m. for public
meeting and 7 p.m.–8:30 p.m. for public
hearing.
Place: East Bank Regional Library,
Jefferson/Napoleon Rooms, 4747 W.
Napoleon Ave., Metaire, LA 70001.
For Further Information Contact: Ms.
Diane Smith, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Telephone: (214) 655–2145. Email
address: smith.diane@epa.gov. The
complete proposed permit, Fact Sheet
and a copy of the Federal Register
notice may also be obtained on the
Internet at: https://www.epa.gov/region6/
water/npdes/genpermit/.
Supplementary Information:
Statutory and Regulatory History
The Clean Water Act (‘‘CWA’’)
establishes a comprehensive program
‘‘to restore and maintain the chemical,
physical, and biological integrity of the
Nation’s waters.’’ 33 U.S.C. 1251(a). The
CWA also includes the objective of
attaining ‘‘water quality which provides
for the protection and propagation of
fish, shellfish and wildlife and * * *
recreation in and on the water.’’ 33
U.S.C. 1251(a)(2). To achieve these
goals, the CWA requires EPA to control
point source discharges of pollutants to
Waters of the United States through the
issuance of National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (‘‘NPDES’’) permits.
NPDES permits issued for oil and gas
exploration, development, and
production discharges are required
under Section 402(a)(1) of the CWA to
include conditions for meeting
technology-based effluent limits
established under Section 301 and,
where applicable, Section 306. Once an
effluent limitations guideline or new
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Mar 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
source performance standard is
promulgated in accordance with these
sections, NPDES permits issued by the
NPDES permitting authorities must
incorporate requirements based on such
limitations and standards. See 40 CFR
122.44(a)(1). Effluent limitation
guidelines for the Offshore Subcategory
of the Oil and Gas Extraction Point
Source Category are found at 40 CFR
part 435, subpart A.
Regulated Entities. EPA intends to use
the reissued permit to regulate oil and
gas extraction facilities located in the
Outer Continental Shelf of the Western
Gulf of Mexico, e.g., offshore oil and gas
extraction platforms, but other types of
facilities may also be subject to the
permit. Covered operators would fall
primarily under the North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) 211 and 213 code series
(previously the Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) 13 code series). To
determine whether your facility,
company, business, organization, etc.,
may be affected by today’s action, you
should carefully examine the
applicability criteria in Part I, Section
A.1 of the draft permit. Questions on the
permit’s application to specific facilities
may also be directed to Ms. Smith at the
telephone number or address listed
above.
Oil Spill Requirements. Section 311 of
the Clean Water Act, (CWA or the Act),
prohibits the discharge of oil and
hazardous materials in harmful
quantities. Discharges that are
authorized by NPDES permits are
excluded from the provisions of Section
311. However, the permit does not
preclude the institution of legal action
or relieve permittees from any
responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties
for other, unauthorized discharges of oil
and hazardous materials which are
covered by Section 311 of the Act.
Ocean Discharge Criteria Evaluation.
For discharges into waters of the
territorial sea, contiguous zone, or
oceans, CWA section 403(c) requires
EPA to consider guidelines for
determining potential degradation of the
marine environment when issuing
NPDES permits. These Ocean Discharge
Criteria (40 CFR part 125, subpart M) are
intended to ‘‘prevent unreasonable
degradation of the marine environment
and to authorize imposition of effluent
limitations, including a prohibition of
discharge, if necessary, to ensure this
goal’’ (45 FR 65942, October 3, 1980).
EPA Region 6 previously determined
that discharges in compliance with the
OCS general permit would not cause
unreasonable degradation of the marine
environment. EPA had also completed a
study of the effects of produced water
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
discharges on hypoxia in the northern
Gulf of Mexico and found that these
discharges would not have a significant
impact. (See Predicted Impacts from
Offshore Produced Water Discharges on
Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, LimnoTech, Inc., 2006). Since this reissued
permit contains limitations that will
protect water quality and in general
reduce the discharge of toxic pollutants
to the marine environment, the Region
finds that discharges authorized by the
reissued general permit will not likely
cause unreasonable degradation of the
marine environment. EPA is proposing
to require an industry-wide produced
water and drilling fluid characterization
study to obtain more representative data
to evaluate impacts to water quality.
Marine Protection, Research, and
Sanctuaries Act. The Marine Protection,
Research and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA)
of 1972 regulates the transportation for
dumping of materials into ocean waters
and establishes permit programs for
ocean dumping. The NPDES permit EPA
reissues today does not authorize
dumping under MPRSA.
In addition the MPRSA establishes
the Marine Sanctuaries Program,
implemented by the National
Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), which requires
NOAA to designate certain ocean waters
as marine sanctuaries for the purpose of
preserving or restoring their
conservation, recreational, ecological or
aesthetic values. Pursuant to the Marine
Protection and Sanctuaries Act, NOAA
has designated the Flower Garden
Banks, an area within the coverage of
the OCS general permit, a marine
sanctuary. The OCS general permit
prohibits discharges in areas of
biological concern, including marine
sanctuaries. The permit authorizes
discharges incidental to oil and gas
production from a facility which
predates designation of the Flower
Garden Banks National Marine
Sanctuary as a marine sanctuary. EPA
has previously worked extensively with
NOAA to ensure that authorized
discharges are consistent with
regulations governing the National
Marine Sanctuary.
National Environmental Policy Act. In
connection with its oil and gas leasing
programs under the Outer Continental
Shelf Lands Act, the Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management of the Department
of Interior (BOEM) has prepared and
published draft environmental impact
statements (EIS) on potential impacts of
oil and gas operations in the Central and
Western Gulf of Mexico for the 2012—
2017 period. BOEM published a Notice
of Availability of the DRAFT EIS at 76
FR 39435 (December 30, 2011). EPA is
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 7, 2012 / Notices
a cooperating agency on BOEM’s EIS
and intends to use that EIS to fulfill the
National Environmental Policy Act
obligations for this permit issuance.
Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries
Conservation and Management Act. The
Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries
Conservation and Management Act
requires that federal agencies proposing
to authorize actions that may adversely
affect essential fish habitat (EFH)
consult with NMFS. The entire Gulf of
Mexico has been designated EFH. EPA
intends to adopt the EFH analysis
BOEM prepared in the above mentioned
Draft EIS for lease sales in the Western
and Central Planning Areas (WPA and
CPA). BOEM concludes in the Draft EIS
that ‘‘Impacts of routine dredging and
discharges are localized in time and
space and are regulated by Federal and
State agencies through permitting
processes; therefore, there would be
minimal impact to fish resources and
essential fish habitat from these routine
activities associated with a WPA or CPA
proposed action.’’ BOEM also concludes
that ‘‘If there is an effect of an oil spill
on fish resources in the Gulf of Mexico,
it is expected to cause a minimal
decrease in standing stocks of any
population. This is because most spill
events would be localized, therefore
affecting a small portion of fish
populations.’’ This permit contains
limitations conforming to EPA’s Oil and
Gas extraction, Offshore Subcategory
Effluent Limitations Guidelines at 40
CFR Part 435 and additional
requirements assuring that regulated
discharges will cause no unreasonable
degradation of the marine environment,
as required by section 403(c) of the
Clean Water Act. This permit also does
not authorize spills or any uncontrolled
discharges.
Endangered Species Act (ESA). The
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) previously concurred with
EPA’s determination that reissuance of
the General Permit for the Outer
Continental Shelf of the Western Gulf of
Mexico (OCS general permit) was not
likely to adversely affect any listed
threatened or endangered species or
designated critical habitat when the
permit was reissued in 1991 and 1998
and when it was modified in 1993 and
2001. When EPA reissued the OCS
general permit in 2004, EPA requested
written concurrence on EPA’s ‘‘may
affect but are not likely to adversely
affect’’ determination from NMFS. In a
letter dated July 12, 2004, NMFS
provided such concurrence on the 2004
issued OCS general permit. When EPA
proposed reissuance of the permit in
2006, EPA found that changes would
not decrease the level of protection the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Mar 06, 2012
Jkt 226001
permit affords threatened or endangered
species. The main changes included
new intake structure requirements and
more stringent whole effluent toxicity
limits based on sub-lethal effects. Since
those changes would increase the level
of protection, EPA determined that
reissuance of the permit was not likely
to adversely affect any listed threatened
or endangered species or their critical
habitat.
EPA is evaluating the effects caused
by this permit reissuance action upon
the 2004 consultation baseline. EPA will
meet its responsibility to fulfill the
section 7 of the ESA requirements prior
to reissuance of this general permit.
State Water Quality Standards and
State Certification. The permit does not
authorize discharges to State waters;
therefore, the state water quality
certification provisions of CWA section
401 do not apply to this proposed
action.
Coastal Zone Management Act. EPA
determined that activities proposed to
be authorized by this reissued permit
are consistent with the local and state
Coastal Zone Management Plans. The
proposed permit and consistency
determination was submitted to the
State of Louisiana and the State of Texas
for interagency review at the time of
public notice. Concurrence was received
from both Louisiana Department of
Natural Resources and Railroad
Commission of Texas on the 2007
permit. Both letters of concurrence were
dated February 23, 2007. EPA again
determines that reissuance of this
permit is consistent with the local and
state Coastal Zone Management Plans.
The proposed permit and consistency
determination are submitted to the State
of Louisiana and the State of Texas for
interagency review at the time of public
notice.
Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection required by this
permit will reduce paperwork
significantly by implementation of
electronic reporting requirements. EPA
is working on an electronic notice of
intent (eNOI) system so applicants will
file their NOIs online. EPA estimates
that it takes 10 to 15 minutes to fill up
all information required by eNOI for
each lease block, and it takes much less
time to add, delete, or modify eNOI.
EPA will also incorporate an electronic
discharge monitoring report (NetDMR)
requirement in the permit. The time for
NetDMR preparation will be much less
than that for paper DMR. The electronic
filing systems will also significantly
reduce the mailing cost.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq, requires that EPA prepare a
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13603
regulatory flexibility analysis for
regulations that have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. As indicated below, the permit
reissuance proposed today is not a
‘‘rule’’ subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. EPA prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis, however,
on the promulgation of the Offshore
Subcategory guidelines on which many
of the permit’s effluent limitations are
based. That analysis shows that
reissuance of this permit will not have
a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Dated February 28, 2012.
William K. Honker,
Acting Director, Water Quality Protection
Division, EPA Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012–5534 Filed 3–6–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9644–2; CERCLA–04–2012–3763]
Anniston PCB Superfund Site;
Anniston, Calhoun County, AL;
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of Correction to Federal
Register Posting.
AGENCY:
In the Federal Register
published on February 27, 2012, 77 FR
11533 (FRL–9637–7), EPA posted a
Notice of Amended Settlement
concerning the Anniston PCB
Superfund Site located in Anniston. The
settlement is not an amendment, but a
new settlement at this Site. The
comment period will remain the same
and end on March 28, 2012.
DATES: The Agency will consider public
comments on the settlement until March
28, 2012. The Agency will consider all
comments received and may modify or
withdraw its consent to the settlement
if comments received disclose facts or
considerations which indicate that the
settlement is inappropriate, improper,
or inadequate.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are
available from Ms. Paula V. Painter.
Submit your comments by Site name
Anniston PCB by one of the following
methods:
• www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/
programs/enforcement/
enforcement.html.
• Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula V. Painter at 404/562–8887.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13601-13603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5534]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9644-4]
Notice of Proposed NPDES General Permit; Proposed NPDES General
Permit for New and Existing Sources and New Dischargers in the Offshore
Subcategory of the Oil and Gas Extraction Category for the Western
Portion of the Outer Continental Shelf of the Gulf of Mexico
(GMG290000)
Summary: The Regional Administrator of Region 6 today proposes to
reissue the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
General Permit No. GMG290000 for existing and new sources and new
dischargers in the Offshore Subcategory of the Oil and Gas Extraction
Point Source Category (40 CFR Part 435, Subpart A), located in and
discharging to the Outer Continental Shelf offshore of Louisiana and
Texas. The discharge of produced water to that portion of the Outer
Continental Shelf from Offshore Subcategory facilities located in the
territorial seas of Louisiana and Texas is also authorized by this
permit.
This draft permit proposes to retain, with certain modifications,
the limitations and conditions of the existing 2007 issued permit (2007
permit). The 2007 permit limitations conform with the Oil and Gas
Offshore Subcategory Guidelines and contain additional requirements to
assess impacts from the discharge of produced water to the marine
environment, as required by section 403(c) of the Clean Water Act.
The following major changes to the 2007 permit are proposed as part
of the permit reissuance: (1) Define operators for the purpose of this
permit, (2) delete New Source Exemption language, (3) add toxicity test
requirement for hydrate control fluids, (4) add spill prevention best
management practices provision, (5) authorize de minimis discharges
caused by subsea safety valve testing, (6) require electronic Notice of
Intent (NOI) and discharge monitoring reporting (NetDMR), and (7)
establish updated critical dilutions for whole effluent toxicity (WET)
limitations for produced water.
Addresses: Comments should be sent to: Ms. Diane Smith, Water
Quality Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may be
sent electronically to smith.diane@epa.gov.
Dates: Comments must be received by May 7, 2012. Public meetings
and hearings on the proposed permit will be
[[Page 13602]]
held at the times and places below. The meetings will include a
presentation on the proposed permit followed by the opportunity for
questions and answers. The public hearings will be held in accordance
with the requirements of 40 CFR 124.12. At the public hearing, any
person may submit oral or written statements and data concerning the
proposed permit. Any person who cannot attend one of the public
hearings may still submit written comments, which have the same weight
as comments made at the public hearing, through the end of the public
comment period.
Date: April 11, 2012.
Time: 6 p.m.-7:30 p.m. for public meeting and 7:30 p.m.-9 p.m. for
public hearing.
Place: Houston Marriott South Hobby Airport, Galveston Room, 9100
Gulf Freeway, Houston, TX 77017.
Date: April 12, 2012.
Time: 5:30 p.m.-7 p.m. for public meeting and 7 p.m.-8:30 p.m. for
public hearing.
Place: East Bank Regional Library, Jefferson/Napoleon Rooms, 4747
W. Napoleon Ave., Metaire, LA 70001.
For Further Information Contact: Ms. Diane Smith, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733. Telephone: (214) 655-2145. Email address:
smith.diane@epa.gov. The complete proposed permit, Fact Sheet and a
copy of the Federal Register notice may also be obtained on the
Internet at: https://www.epa.gov/region6/water/npdes/genpermit/.
Supplementary Information:
Statutory and Regulatory History
The Clean Water Act (``CWA'') establishes a comprehensive program
``to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological
integrity of the Nation's waters.'' 33 U.S.C. 1251(a). The CWA also
includes the objective of attaining ``water quality which provides for
the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish and wildlife and * *
* recreation in and on the water.'' 33 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2). To achieve
these goals, the CWA requires EPA to control point source discharges of
pollutants to Waters of the United States through the issuance of
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (``NPDES'') permits.
NPDES permits issued for oil and gas exploration, development, and
production discharges are required under Section 402(a)(1) of the CWA
to include conditions for meeting technology-based effluent limits
established under Section 301 and, where applicable, Section 306. Once
an effluent limitations guideline or new source performance standard is
promulgated in accordance with these sections, NPDES permits issued by
the NPDES permitting authorities must incorporate requirements based on
such limitations and standards. See 40 CFR 122.44(a)(1). Effluent
limitation guidelines for the Offshore Subcategory of the Oil and Gas
Extraction Point Source Category are found at 40 CFR part 435, subpart
A.
Regulated Entities. EPA intends to use the reissued permit to
regulate oil and gas extraction facilities located in the Outer
Continental Shelf of the Western Gulf of Mexico, e.g., offshore oil and
gas extraction platforms, but other types of facilities may also be
subject to the permit. Covered operators would fall primarily under the
North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 211 and 213
code series (previously the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 13
code series). To determine whether your facility, company, business,
organization, etc., may be affected by today's action, you should
carefully examine the applicability criteria in Part I, Section A.1 of
the draft permit. Questions on the permit's application to specific
facilities may also be directed to Ms. Smith at the telephone number or
address listed above.
Oil Spill Requirements. Section 311 of the Clean Water Act, (CWA or
the Act), prohibits the discharge of oil and hazardous materials in
harmful quantities. Discharges that are authorized by NPDES permits are
excluded from the provisions of Section 311. However, the permit does
not preclude the institution of legal action or relieve permittees from
any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties for other, unauthorized
discharges of oil and hazardous materials which are covered by Section
311 of the Act.
Ocean Discharge Criteria Evaluation. For discharges into waters of
the territorial sea, contiguous zone, or oceans, CWA section 403(c)
requires EPA to consider guidelines for determining potential
degradation of the marine environment when issuing NPDES permits. These
Ocean Discharge Criteria (40 CFR part 125, subpart M) are intended to
``prevent unreasonable degradation of the marine environment and to
authorize imposition of effluent limitations, including a prohibition
of discharge, if necessary, to ensure this goal'' (45 FR 65942, October
3, 1980). EPA Region 6 previously determined that discharges in
compliance with the OCS general permit would not cause unreasonable
degradation of the marine environment. EPA had also completed a study
of the effects of produced water discharges on hypoxia in the northern
Gulf of Mexico and found that these discharges would not have a
significant impact. (See Predicted Impacts from Offshore Produced Water
Discharges on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, Limno-Tech, Inc., 2006).
Since this reissued permit contains limitations that will protect water
quality and in general reduce the discharge of toxic pollutants to the
marine environment, the Region finds that discharges authorized by the
reissued general permit will not likely cause unreasonable degradation
of the marine environment. EPA is proposing to require an industry-wide
produced water and drilling fluid characterization study to obtain more
representative data to evaluate impacts to water quality.
Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act. The Marine
Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA) of 1972 regulates the
transportation for dumping of materials into ocean waters and
establishes permit programs for ocean dumping. The NPDES permit EPA
reissues today does not authorize dumping under MPRSA.
In addition the MPRSA establishes the Marine Sanctuaries Program,
implemented by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), which requires NOAA to designate certain ocean
waters as marine sanctuaries for the purpose of preserving or restoring
their conservation, recreational, ecological or aesthetic values.
Pursuant to the Marine Protection and Sanctuaries Act, NOAA has
designated the Flower Garden Banks, an area within the coverage of the
OCS general permit, a marine sanctuary. The OCS general permit
prohibits discharges in areas of biological concern, including marine
sanctuaries. The permit authorizes discharges incidental to oil and gas
production from a facility which predates designation of the Flower
Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary as a marine sanctuary. EPA has
previously worked extensively with NOAA to ensure that authorized
discharges are consistent with regulations governing the National
Marine Sanctuary.
National Environmental Policy Act. In connection with its oil and
gas leasing programs under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management of the Department of Interior (BOEM)
has prepared and published draft environmental impact statements (EIS)
on potential impacts of oil and gas operations in the Central and
Western Gulf of Mexico for the 2012--2017 period. BOEM published a
Notice of Availability of the DRAFT EIS at 76 FR 39435 (December 30,
2011). EPA is
[[Page 13603]]
a cooperating agency on BOEM's EIS and intends to use that EIS to
fulfill the National Environmental Policy Act obligations for this
permit issuance.
Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act. The
Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act requires
that federal agencies proposing to authorize actions that may adversely
affect essential fish habitat (EFH) consult with NMFS. The entire Gulf
of Mexico has been designated EFH. EPA intends to adopt the EFH
analysis BOEM prepared in the above mentioned Draft EIS for lease sales
in the Western and Central Planning Areas (WPA and CPA). BOEM concludes
in the Draft EIS that ``Impacts of routine dredging and discharges are
localized in time and space and are regulated by Federal and State
agencies through permitting processes; therefore, there would be
minimal impact to fish resources and essential fish habitat from these
routine activities associated with a WPA or CPA proposed action.'' BOEM
also concludes that ``If there is an effect of an oil spill on fish
resources in the Gulf of Mexico, it is expected to cause a minimal
decrease in standing stocks of any population. This is because most
spill events would be localized, therefore affecting a small portion of
fish populations.'' This permit contains limitations conforming to
EPA's Oil and Gas extraction, Offshore Subcategory Effluent Limitations
Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 435 and additional requirements assuring that
regulated discharges will cause no unreasonable degradation of the
marine environment, as required by section 403(c) of the Clean Water
Act. This permit also does not authorize spills or any uncontrolled
discharges.
Endangered Species Act (ESA). The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) previously concurred with EPA's determination that reissuance of
the General Permit for the Outer Continental Shelf of the Western Gulf
of Mexico (OCS general permit) was not likely to adversely affect any
listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat
when the permit was reissued in 1991 and 1998 and when it was modified
in 1993 and 2001. When EPA reissued the OCS general permit in 2004, EPA
requested written concurrence on EPA's ``may affect but are not likely
to adversely affect'' determination from NMFS. In a letter dated July
12, 2004, NMFS provided such concurrence on the 2004 issued OCS general
permit. When EPA proposed reissuance of the permit in 2006, EPA found
that changes would not decrease the level of protection the permit
affords threatened or endangered species. The main changes included new
intake structure requirements and more stringent whole effluent
toxicity limits based on sub-lethal effects. Since those changes would
increase the level of protection, EPA determined that reissuance of the
permit was not likely to adversely affect any listed threatened or
endangered species or their critical habitat.
EPA is evaluating the effects caused by this permit reissuance
action upon the 2004 consultation baseline. EPA will meet its
responsibility to fulfill the section 7 of the ESA requirements prior
to reissuance of this general permit.
State Water Quality Standards and State Certification. The permit
does not authorize discharges to State waters; therefore, the state
water quality certification provisions of CWA section 401 do not apply
to this proposed action.
Coastal Zone Management Act. EPA determined that activities
proposed to be authorized by this reissued permit are consistent with
the local and state Coastal Zone Management Plans. The proposed permit
and consistency determination was submitted to the State of Louisiana
and the State of Texas for interagency review at the time of public
notice. Concurrence was received from both Louisiana Department of
Natural Resources and Railroad Commission of Texas on the 2007 permit.
Both letters of concurrence were dated February 23, 2007. EPA again
determines that reissuance of this permit is consistent with the local
and state Coastal Zone Management Plans. The proposed permit and
consistency determination are submitted to the State of Louisiana and
the State of Texas for interagency review at the time of public notice.
Paperwork Reduction Act. The information collection required by
this permit will reduce paperwork significantly by implementation of
electronic reporting requirements. EPA is working on an electronic
notice of intent (eNOI) system so applicants will file their NOIs
online. EPA estimates that it takes 10 to 15 minutes to fill up all
information required by eNOI for each lease block, and it takes much
less time to add, delete, or modify eNOI. EPA will also incorporate an
electronic discharge monitoring report (NetDMR) requirement in the
permit. The time for NetDMR preparation will be much less than that for
paper DMR. The electronic filing systems will also significantly reduce
the mailing cost.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq, requires that EPA prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis for regulations that have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. As indicated below, the permit
reissuance proposed today is not a ``rule'' subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. EPA prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis,
however, on the promulgation of the Offshore Subcategory guidelines on
which many of the permit's effluent limitations are based. That
analysis shows that reissuance of this permit will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Dated February 28, 2012.
William K. Honker,
Acting Director, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012-5534 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P