Federal Acquisition Regulation; Information Collection; Davis Bacon Act-Price Adjustment (Actual Method), 13328-13329 [2012-5322]
Download as PDF
13328
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2012 / Notices
IV. Effects of the Acquisition
The proposed acquisition likely
would result in significant
anticompetitive harm in the highlyconcentrated relevant markets for each
of the MP Alloys. Carpenter and Latrobe
are the only competitors in these highlyconcentrated markets. The acquisition
will eliminate actual, direct, and
substantial competition between
Carpenter and Latrobe, and likely result
in higher prices for both of the MP
Alloys.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
V. The Consent Agreement
The proposed Consent Agreement
remedies the competitive concerns
raised by the transaction by requiring
the parties to divest assets related to the
manufacture of the MP Alloys to
Eramet. The terms required by the
Consent Agreement will enable Eramet
to effectively replace the competition in
the MP Alloys markets lost as a result
of the proposed acquisition.
Eramet is a global supplier of
specialty alloys with an established
sales and marketing network in the
United States that will allow it to be
immediately competitive in the relevant
MP Alloys markets. Eramet is based in
France, which is an approved foreign
source country for U.S. military
operations under DFARS. The proposed
Consent Agreement requires Carpenter
to provide Eramet with product licenses
and the manufacturing technology
necessary to manufacture the MP
Alloys. This includes technical
assistance from current Latrobe
company designees, and confidential
business information directly related to
the manufacture of the MP Alloys. In
addition, the Consent Agreement
requires Carpenter to contract
manufacture the MP Alloys for Eramet
at cost until Eramet is able to produce
and commercially sell these products on
its own. The Commission has appointed
James R. Bucci, who has over 35 years
of experience in the specialty alloy
industry, as the interim monitor to
oversee the divestiture.
If after the public comment period the
Commission determines that Eramet is
not an acceptable acquirer of the assets
to be divested, or that the manner of the
divestitures is not acceptable, Carpenter
must unwind the divestiture and divest
the assets within 180 days of the date
the Order becomes final to another
Commission-approved acquirer. If
Carpenter fails to divest the assets
within the 180 days, the Commission
may appoint a trustee to divest the
relevant assets.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:56 Mar 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
proposed Consent Agreement, and it is
not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the proposed Consent
Agreement or to modify its terms in any
way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–5333 Filed 3–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0154; Docket 2012–
0076; Sequence 11]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Information Collection; Davis Bacon
Act—Price Adjustment (Actual Method)
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding an extension to an
existing OMB clearance.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve an extension of a
previously approved information
collection requirement concerning the
Davis-Bacon Act price adjustment
(actual method).
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, through the use of appropriate
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
May 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
9000–0154, Davis Bacon Act—Price
Adjustment (Actual Method), by any of
the following methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal
eRulemaking portal by inputting
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0154,
Davis Bacon Act—Price Adjustment
(Actual Method)’’ under the heading
‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and selecting
‘‘Search.’’ Select the link ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ that corresponds with
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0154,
Davis Bacon Act—Price Adjustment
(Actual Method).’’ Follow the
instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0154,
Davis Bacon Act—Price Adjustment
(Actual Method)’’ on your attached
document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417. Attn: Hada
Flowers/IC 9000–0154, Davis Bacon
Act—Price Adjustment (Actual
Method).
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
9000–0154, Davis Bacon Act—Price
Adjustment (Actual Method), in all
correspondence related to this
collection. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Edward Loeb, Procurement
Analyst, Federal Acquisition Policy
Division, GSA, (202) 501–0650, or via
email Edward.loeb@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
Government contracting officers may
include FAR clause 52.222–32, DavisBacon Act—Price Adjustment (Actual
Method) in fixed-price solicitations and
contracts, subject to the Davis-Bacon
Act under certain conditions. The
conditions are that the solicitation or
contract contains option provisions to
extend the term of the contract and the
contracting officer determines that the
most appropriate method to adjust the
contract price at option exercise is to
use a computation method based on the
actual increase or decrease from a new
or revised Department of Labor DavisBacon Act wage determination.
The clause requires that a contractor
submit at the exercise of each option to
extend the term of the contract, a
statement of the amount claimed for
incorporation of the most current wage
determination by the Department of
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2012 / Notices
Labor, and any relevant supporting data,
including payroll records, that the
contracting officer may reasonably
require. The information is used by
Government contracting officers to
establish the contract price adjustment
for the construction requirements of a
contract, generally if the contract
requirements are predominantly
services subject to the Service Contract
Act.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 842.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 842.
Hours per Response: 40.
Total Burden Hours: 33,680.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417,
telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite
OMB Control No. 9000–0154, DavisBacon Act—Price Adjustment (Actual
Method), in all correspondence.
Dated: February 28, 2012
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–5322 Filed 3–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0163; Docket 2011–
0076; Sequence 6]
Information Collection; Small Business
Size Representation
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for an
extension to an existing OMB clearance.
AGENCIES:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request for
approval of a previously approved
information collection requirement
regarding small business size
representation.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Submit comments on or before:
May 7, 2012.
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:56 Mar 05, 2012
Jkt 226001
Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
9000–0163, Small Business Size
Representation, by any of the following
methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal
eRulemaking portal by inputting
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0163,
Small Business Size Representation’’
under the heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or
ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search’’. Select the
link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘Information
Collection 9000–0163, Small Business
Size Representation’’. Follow the
instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0163,
Small Business Size Representation’’ on
your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417. Attn: Hada
Flowers/IC 9000–0163, Small Business
Size Representation.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
9000–0163, Small Business Size
Representation, in all correspondence
related to this collection. All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business
confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Karlos Morgan, Procurement Analyst,
Office of Governmentwide Acquisition
Policy, GSA (202) 501–0044 or
karlos.morgan@gsa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
19.301 and the FAR clause at 52.219–28,
Post-Award Small Business Program
Representation implement the Small
Business Administration (SBA) Final
Rule (71 FR 66434), Small Business Size
Regulations; Size for Purposes of
Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts,
Multiple Award Schedule Contracts and
Other Long-Term Contracts; 8(a)
Business Development/Small
Disadvantaged Business; Business
Status Determinations. FAR 19.301 and
the FAR clause at 52.219–28, requires
that contractors represent size status by
updating their representations and
certifications at the prime contract level
in the Online Representations and
Certifications Application (ORCA), and
notify the contracting office that it has
made the required representation.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13329
The purpose of implementing small
business rerepresentation in the FAR is
to ensure that small business size status
is accurately represented and reported
over the life of long-term contracts. The
FAR also provides for provisions
designed to ensure more accurate
reporting of size status for contracts that
are novated, merged or acquired by
another business. This information is
used by the SBA, Congress, Federal
agencies and the general public for
various reasons such as determining if
agencies are meeting statutory goals, setaside determinations, and market
research.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 10,000.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Hours per Response: 0.5.
Total Burden Hours: 5,000.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417,
telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite
OMB Control No. 9000–0163, Small
Business Size Rerepresentation, in all
correspondence.
Dated: February 28, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012–5323 Filed 3–5–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Pandemic Influenza Vaccines—
Amendment
Notice of Amendment to the
March 1, 2010 Republished Declaration
under the Public Readiness and
Emergency Preparedness Act.
ACTION:
Amendment to declaration
issued on March 1, 2010 (75 FR 10268)
pursuant to section 319F–3 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–6d)
to extend the effective time period,
reformat the declaration, modify or
clarify terms of the declaration and
republish the declaration in its entirety,
as amended.
DATES: The amendment of the
republished declaration issued on
March 1, 2010 is effective as of February
29, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Lurie, MD, MSPH, Assistant
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13328-13329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5322]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000-0154; Docket 2012-0076; Sequence 11]
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Information Collection; Davis
Bacon Act--Price Adjustment (Actual Method)
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension to
an existing OMB clearance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a
previously approved information collection requirement concerning the
Davis-Bacon Act price adjustment (actual method).
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the FAR, and whether it will have practical utility;
whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in which we can minimize the
burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond,
through the use of appropriate technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before May 7, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 9000-
0154, Davis Bacon Act--Price Adjustment (Actual Method), by any of the
following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by inputting
``Information Collection 9000-0154, Davis Bacon Act--Price Adjustment
(Actual Method)'' under the heading ``Enter Keyword or ID'' and
selecting ``Search.'' Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that
corresponds with ``Information Collection 9000-0154, Davis Bacon Act--
Price Adjustment (Actual Method).'' Follow the instructions provided at
the ``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name
(if any), and ``Information Collection 9000-0154, Davis Bacon Act--
Price Adjustment (Actual Method)'' on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417. Attn:
Hada Flowers/IC 9000-0154, Davis Bacon Act--Price Adjustment (Actual
Method).
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information
Collection 9000-0154, Davis Bacon Act--Price Adjustment (Actual
Method), in all correspondence related to this collection. All comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal and/or business confidential information
provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Edward Loeb, Procurement Analyst, Federal Acquisition Policy
Division, GSA, (202) 501-0650, or via email Edward.loeb@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
Government contracting officers may include FAR clause 52.222-32,
Davis-Bacon Act--Price Adjustment (Actual Method) in fixed-price
solicitations and contracts, subject to the Davis-Bacon Act under
certain conditions. The conditions are that the solicitation or
contract contains option provisions to extend the term of the contract
and the contracting officer determines that the most appropriate method
to adjust the contract price at option exercise is to use a computation
method based on the actual increase or decrease from a new or revised
Department of Labor Davis-Bacon Act wage determination.
The clause requires that a contractor submit at the exercise of
each option to extend the term of the contract, a statement of the
amount claimed for incorporation of the most current wage determination
by the Department of
[[Page 13329]]
Labor, and any relevant supporting data, including payroll records,
that the contracting officer may reasonably require. The information is
used by Government contracting officers to establish the contract price
adjustment for the construction requirements of a contract, generally
if the contract requirements are predominantly services subject to the
Service Contract Act.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 842.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 842.
Hours per Response: 40.
Total Burden Hours: 33,680.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20417, telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB Control
No. 9000-0154, Davis-Bacon Act--Price Adjustment (Actual Method), in
all correspondence.
Dated: February 28, 2012
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-5322 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P