Beef Promotion and Research; Amendment to the Order, 12752-12754 [2012-5145]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
12752
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
The Board also considered differing
levels of adjustments under the OSF
when considering supply. The
alternative adjustments were deemed to
be either too small to address industry
needs, or so large that members were
concerned with creating an oversupply.
Therefore, these alternatives were
rejected.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0177, Tart
cherries Grown in the States of MI, NY,
PA, OR, UT, WA, and WI. No changes
in those requirements as a result of this
action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This action would not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
tart cherry handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E–Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this proposed rule.
In addition, the Board’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the tart
cherry industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Board
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Board meetings, the September 15,
2011, meeting was a public meeting and
all entities, both large and small, were
able to express views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Laurel May at
the previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Mar 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
appropriate because this rule would
need to be in place as soon as possible
since handlers are already shipping tart
cherries from the 2011–12 crop. All
written comments timely received will
be considered before a final
determination is made on this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tart
cherries.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 930 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 930—TART CHERRIES GROWN
IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW
YORK, PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON,
UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND
WISCONSIN
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 930 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 930.256 is added to read as
follows:
Note: This section will not appear in the
annual Code of Federal Regulations.
§ 930.256 Final free and restricted
percentages for the 2011–12 crop year.
The final percentages for tart cherries
handled by handlers during the crop
year beginning on July 1, 2011, which
shall be free and restricted, respectively,
are designated as follows: Free
percentage, 88 percent and restricted
percentage, 12 percent.
Dated: February 28, 2012.
Robert C. Keeney,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–5171 Filed 3–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1260
[Doc. No. AMS–LS–11–0086]
Beef Promotion and Research;
Amendment to the Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
expand the contracting authority as
established under the Beef Promotion
and Research (Order). The Beef
Research and Information Act (Act)
requires that the Beef Promotion
Operating Committee (BPOC) enter into
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contracts with established national nonprofit industry-governed organizations
including the Federation of State Beef
Councils to implement programs of
promotion, research, consumer
information, and industry information.
The Act does not define ‘‘national nonprofit industry governed organization,’’
however, the Order states that these
organizations must be governed by a
board of directors representing the cattle
or beef industry on a national basis and
that they were active and ongoing prior
to enactment of the Act. This proposed
rule would change the date requirement
in the Order so that organizations
otherwise qualified could be eligible to
contract with the BPOC for the
implementation and conduct of Beef
Checkoff programs if they have been
active and ongoing for at least two years.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by May 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be posted
online at www.regulations.gov or sent to
Craig Shackelford, Agricultural
Marketing Specialist, Marketing
Programs Division, Livestock and Seed
Program, Agricultural Marketing
Service, USDA, Room 2628–S, STOP
0251, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0251; or fax to
(202) 720–1125. All comments should
reference the docket number, the date,
and the page number of this issue of the
Federal Register. Comments will be
available for public inspection at the
aforementioned address, as well as on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Shackelford, Agricultural
Marketing Specialist, Marketing
Programs Division, on 202/720–1115,
fax 202/720–1125, or by email at
craig.shackelford@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
has waived the review process required
by Executive Order 12866 for this
action.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect.
Section 11 of the Act provides that
nothing in the Act may be construed to
preempt or supersede any other program
relating to beef promotion organized
and operated under the laws of the
United States or any State. There are no
administrative proceedings that must be
exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this rule.
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic effect of this
action on small entities and has
determined that this proposed rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The purpose of RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly burdened.
In the February 2011 publication of
‘‘Farms, Land in Farms, and Livestock
Operations,’’ the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA) National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
estimates that in 2010 the number of
operations in the United States with
cattle totaled approximately 935,000.
The majority of these operations that are
subject to the Order may be classified as
small entities.
The proposed rule imposes no new
burden on the industry. It merely
expands the contracting authority
within the Order to permit a greater
number of organizations to perform
work on behalf of the BPOC. These
organizations in general represent the
operations that are subject to the Order.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background and Proposed Action
The Order is authorized by the Act of
1985 [7 U.S.C. 2901–2918]. The Act was
passed as part of the 1985 Farm Bill
[Pub. L. 99–198]. The program became
effective on July 18, 1986, when the
Order was issued [51 FR 26132].
Assessments began on October 1, 1986.
Section 5(6) of the Act provides that
the BPOC, to insure coordination and
efficient use of funds, shall enter into
contracts or agreements for
implementing any activities which it
has approved to be carried out, with
established national nonprofit industrygoverned organizations including the
Federation of State Beef Councils. This
language has the effect of requiring the
BPOC to contract with organizations,
which qualify as established national
non-profit industry-governed
organizations. The Act does not define
‘‘national non-profit industry governed
organization.’’
Currently, section 1260.113 of the
Order defines ‘‘established national
non-profit industry-governed
organizations’’ as organizations which:
(a) Are non-profit organizations
pursuant to sections 501(c)(3), (5) or (6)
of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3), (5), and (6)); (b) are governed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Mar 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
by a board of directors representing the
cattle or beef industry on a national
basis; and (c) were active and ongoing
before enactment of the Act. This
proposed rule would amend section
1260.113 of the Order by replacing the
existing language under paragraph (c),
‘‘were active and ongoing before the
enactment of the Act’’ with ‘‘have been
active and ongoing for at least two
years.’’
The Act, enacted on December 23,
1985, directed the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretary) to accept
proposals from any certified
organization or interested person. The
Department published an invitation to
submit proposals in the Federal
Register on February 14, 1986 [51 FR
5543]. USDA received an industry
proposal that it published in a proposal
rule on March 14, 1986 [51 FR 8980].
This proposed rule included a
definition of ‘‘established national nonprofit industry governed organizations’’
that read: ‘‘‘Established National Nonprofit Industry Governed Organizations’
means any organization which: (a) are
non-profit organizations pursuant to
sections 501(c)(3), (5) or (6) of the
Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3), (5) and (6); (b) are governed by
a board of directors representing the
cattle or beef industry on a national
basis whose Board is composed of a
majority of producers; and (c) was active
and ongoing before enactment of the
Act.’’
The final rule that issued the Order
was published on July 18, 1986 [51 FR
26132]. The definition for ‘‘established
national non-profit industry governed
organizations’’ was modified by deletion
of the requirement that the board of
directors of such organizations be
composed of a majority of producers.
This modification was made based on
comments to the proposed rule that said
the previous definition was too
restrictive.
At the time of the passage of the Act
and the promulgation of the Order, a
limited number of industry-governed
organizations existed with the requisite
knowledge, skills, and experience
related to the marketing of beef and beef
products. The proponents of the Beef
Checkoff wished to utilize and
coordinate with those organizations
already conducting activities similar to
those envisioned under the Act and to
enhance coordination and the efficient
use of funds among beef promotion
entities, and to enhance accountability
to producers.
This proposed rule would amend the
definition of ‘‘Established National Nonprofit Industry Governed Organizations’’
to permit the BPOC to contract with a
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12753
growing number of organizations
possessing the requisite experience,
skills and information related to the
marketing of beef and beef products that
exist today while still requiring a
minimum level of organizational
experience so as not to encourage the
unnecessary proliferation of
inexperienced organizations desiring to
contract with the BPOC. USDA believes
that a minimum level of experience
within an organization is beneficial. To
achieve both goals, this proposal would
amend § 1260.113 ‘‘Established national
non-profit industry-governed
organizations’’ by replacing the existing
language under paragraph (c) to read
‘‘have been active or ongoing for at least
two years.’’
In 2006, the National Cattlemen’s Beef
Association (NCBA) and the American
Farm Bureau initiated the IndustryWide Beef Checkoff Taskforce
(Taskforce) to review, study, and
recommend enhancements to the Beef
Checkoff program for the purpose of
strengthening the Beef Checkoff
Program for the common good of the
beef industry. The Taskforce included
producer and industry representatives
and representatives from national
organizations, while USDA took on an
advisory role during meetings. The
Taskforce issued a report in September
2006, which included a
recommendation to eliminate section
1260.113(c) in order to make the Beef
Checkoff more inclusive. USDA believes
that permitting a greater number of
organizations to contract with the BPOC
could bring new perspectives to the
contracting process.
In February 2008 at the Cattle
Industry Annual Convention, leaders of
the Cattlemen’s Beef Board (Board)
asked AMS officials if the Board could
conduct a program review. The industry
officials believed that it would be in the
best interest of the Beef Checkoff
Program to conduct a review of the
operations to determine if there are any
changes that need to or could be made
in program operations, the Act, or Order
that would facilitate a more effective
Beef Checkoff Program. Included in the
Board’s subsequent January 2009
recommendations to AMS was a
recommendation for a statutory
amendment intended to result in an
expansion of the contracting authority
to organizations created after the 1986
enactment of the Act.
Finally, a meeting was held in
Minneapolis, Minnesota, on September
27, 2011, attended by many industry
stakeholders and co-hosted by the U.S.
Cattlemen’s Association and the
National Farmers Union as requested by
the Secretary. The goal of the meeting
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
12754
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2012 / Proposed Rules
was to bring more broad-based producer
support to the Beef Checkoff program
through a discussion of issues regarding
Beef Checkoff administration and to
provide the Secretary with
recommendations that would enhance
support for the Beef Checkoff. Many
major Beef Checkoff industry
stakeholders attended, including the
American National Cattlewomen,
American Veal Association, Livestock
Marketing Association, NCBA, National
Livestock Producers Association, and
Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund,
United Stockgrowers of America (R–
CALF). Representatives from the AMS
also attended the meeting, as did the
Chief Executive Officer and Producer
Chairman of the Board.
As a result of that meeting, the
Secretary received a joint letter signed
by most of the organizations in
attendance. The letter requested that
USDA amend Beef Checkoff regulations
to expand the contracting authority as
authorized under the Act and Order by
permitting organizations that are active
and ongoing for at least two years to
contract with the BPOC.
Conclusion
A greater number of beef industry
organizations exist now than did at the
time the Order was issued. The Beef
Checkoff Program could benefit from the
perspectives and skills of some of these
organizations that are ineligible solely
because they were formed after the
enactment of the Act. For several years,
the beef industry has been
recommending expanding the eligibility
of organizations to contract with the
BPOC in order to enhance the Beef
Checkoff Program. Amending the Order
would allow the BPOC to contract with
organizations possessing the requisite
experience, skills and information
related to the marketing of beef and beef
products, as is intended under the Act.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. Sixty days is deemed
appropriate to facilitate the orderly and
thoughtful consideration of this
proposal.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1260
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Imports, Marketing agreement,
Meat and meat products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, it is proposed that 7 CFR part
1260 be amended as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Mar 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
PART 1260—BEEF PROMOTION AND
RESEARCH
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1260 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2901–2911 and 7
U.S.C. 7401.
2. In § 1260.113, paragraph (c) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 1260.113 Established national non-profit
industry-governed organizations.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Have been active and ongoing for
at least two years.
Dated: February 28, 2012.
Robert C. Keeney,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–5145 Filed 3–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 719
48 Parts 931, 952 and 970
RIN 1990–AA37
Contractor Legal Management
Requirements; Acquisition
Regulations
Office of General Counsel,
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Reopening of public comment
period.
AGENCY:
This document announces a
reopening of the time period for
submitting comments on the
Department of Energy (DOE or
Department) notice of proposed
rulemaking (NOPR) to revise existing
regulations covering contractor legal
management requirements and make
conforming amendments to the
Department of Energy Acquisition
Regulation (DEAR) (76 FR 81408). The
comment period is reopened until
March 16, 2012.
DATES: The comment period for the
request for information relating to the
DOE notice of proposed rulemaking to
revise existing regulations covering
contractor legal management
requirements and make conforming
amendments to the DEAR is reopened
until March 16, 2012.
SUMMARY:
Any comments submitted
must identify this NOPR on Contractor
Legal Management Requirements, and
provide regulatory information number
(RIN) 1990–AA37. Comments may be
submitted using any of the following
methods:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email:
DOE.719comments@hq.doe.gov. Include
RIN 1990–AA37 in the subject line of
the message.
3. Mail: Lisa Pinder, Administrative
Assistant, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of General Counsel, GC–60, 1000
Independence Ave. SW., Washington,
DC 20585. If possible, please submit all
items on a compact disc (CD), in which
case it is not necessary to include
printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Lisa
Pinder, Administrative Assistant, U.S.
Department of Energy, GC–60, 1000
Independence Ave. SW., Washington,
DC 20585. Telephone: (202) 586–5426.
If possible, please submit all items on a
CD, in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
No faxes will be accepted.
For further information on how to
submit a public comment, review other
public comments and the docket,
contact Ms. Lisa Pinder (202) 586–5426
or by Email: lisa.pinder@hq.doe.gov.
Mr.
Eric Mulch, Attorney-Adviser, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of General
Counsel, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–5746. Email:
eric.mulch@hq.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On
December 28, 2011, The DOE published
a NOPR in the Federal Register (76 FR
81408) to revise existing regulations
covering contractor legal management
requirements and make conforming
amendments to the DEAR. The NOPR
requested public comment from
interested parties regarding the
proposed revisions by February 27,
2012. DOE has determined that
reopening the comment period to allow
additional time for interested parties to
submit comments is appropriate.
Therefore, DOE is reopening the
comment period until March 16, 2012 to
provide interested parties additional
time to prepare and submit comments.
Accordingly, DOE will consider any
comments received by March 16, 2012
to be timely submitted.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\02MRP1.SGM
02MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12752-12754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5145]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1260
[Doc. No. AMS-LS-11-0086]
Beef Promotion and Research; Amendment to the Order
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would expand the contracting authority as
established under the Beef Promotion and Research (Order). The Beef
Research and Information Act (Act) requires that the Beef Promotion
Operating Committee (BPOC) enter into contracts with established
national non-profit industry-governed organizations including the
Federation of State Beef Councils to implement programs of promotion,
research, consumer information, and industry information. The Act does
not define ``national non-profit industry governed organization,''
however, the Order states that these organizations must be governed by
a board of directors representing the cattle or beef industry on a
national basis and that they were active and ongoing prior to enactment
of the Act. This proposed rule would change the date requirement in the
Order so that organizations otherwise qualified could be eligible to
contract with the BPOC for the implementation and conduct of Beef
Checkoff programs if they have been active and ongoing for at least two
years.
DATES: Written comments must be received by May 1, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments must be posted online at www.regulations.gov or
sent to Craig Shackelford, Agricultural Marketing Specialist, Marketing
Programs Division, Livestock and Seed Program, Agricultural Marketing
Service, USDA, Room 2628-S, STOP 0251, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-0251; or fax to (202) 720-1125. All comments
should reference the docket number, the date, and the page number of
this issue of the Federal Register. Comments will be available for
public inspection at the aforementioned address, as well as on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Shackelford, Agricultural
Marketing Specialist, Marketing Programs Division, on 202/720-1115, fax
202/720-1125, or by email at craig.shackelford@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget has waived the review process
required by Executive Order 12866 for this action.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect.
Section 11 of the Act provides that nothing in the Act may be
construed to preempt or supersede any other program relating to beef
promotion organized and operated under the laws of the United States or
any State. There are no administrative proceedings that must be
exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this
rule.
[[Page 12753]]
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Paperwork Reduction Act
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) has considered the economic effect of this action on
small entities and has determined that this proposed rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The purpose of RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale
of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses
will not be unduly burdened.
In the February 2011 publication of ``Farms, Land in Farms, and
Livestock Operations,'' the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA)
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) estimates that in 2010
the number of operations in the United States with cattle totaled
approximately 935,000. The majority of these operations that are
subject to the Order may be classified as small entities.
The proposed rule imposes no new burden on the industry. It merely
expands the contracting authority within the Order to permit a greater
number of organizations to perform work on behalf of the BPOC. These
organizations in general represent the operations that are subject to
the Order.
Background and Proposed Action
The Order is authorized by the Act of 1985 [7 U.S.C. 2901-2918].
The Act was passed as part of the 1985 Farm Bill [Pub. L. 99-198]. The
program became effective on July 18, 1986, when the Order was issued
[51 FR 26132]. Assessments began on October 1, 1986.
Section 5(6) of the Act provides that the BPOC, to insure
coordination and efficient use of funds, shall enter into contracts or
agreements for implementing any activities which it has approved to be
carried out, with established national nonprofit industry-governed
organizations including the Federation of State Beef Councils. This
language has the effect of requiring the BPOC to contract with
organizations, which qualify as established national non-profit
industry-governed organizations. The Act does not define ``national
non-profit industry governed organization.''
Currently, section 1260.113 of the Order defines ``established
national non-profit industry-governed organizations'' as organizations
which: (a) Are non-profit organizations pursuant to sections 501(c)(3),
(5) or (6) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3), (5), and
(6)); (b) are governed by a board of directors representing the cattle
or beef industry on a national basis; and (c) were active and ongoing
before enactment of the Act. This proposed rule would amend section
1260.113 of the Order by replacing the existing language under
paragraph (c), ``were active and ongoing before the enactment of the
Act'' with ``have been active and ongoing for at least two years.''
The Act, enacted on December 23, 1985, directed the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretary) to accept proposals from any certified
organization or interested person. The Department published an
invitation to submit proposals in the Federal Register on February 14,
1986 [51 FR 5543]. USDA received an industry proposal that it published
in a proposal rule on March 14, 1986 [51 FR 8980]. This proposed rule
included a definition of ``established national non-profit industry
governed organizations'' that read: ```Established National Non-profit
Industry Governed Organizations' means any organization which: (a) are
non-profit organizations pursuant to sections 501(c)(3), (5) or (6) of
the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3), (5) and (6); (b) are
governed by a board of directors representing the cattle or beef
industry on a national basis whose Board is composed of a majority of
producers; and (c) was active and ongoing before enactment of the
Act.''
The final rule that issued the Order was published on July 18, 1986
[51 FR 26132]. The definition for ``established national non-profit
industry governed organizations'' was modified by deletion of the
requirement that the board of directors of such organizations be
composed of a majority of producers. This modification was made based
on comments to the proposed rule that said the previous definition was
too restrictive.
At the time of the passage of the Act and the promulgation of the
Order, a limited number of industry-governed organizations existed with
the requisite knowledge, skills, and experience related to the
marketing of beef and beef products. The proponents of the Beef
Checkoff wished to utilize and coordinate with those organizations
already conducting activities similar to those envisioned under the Act
and to enhance coordination and the efficient use of funds among beef
promotion entities, and to enhance accountability to producers.
This proposed rule would amend the definition of ``Established
National Non-profit Industry Governed Organizations'' to permit the
BPOC to contract with a growing number of organizations possessing the
requisite experience, skills and information related to the marketing
of beef and beef products that exist today while still requiring a
minimum level of organizational experience so as not to encourage the
unnecessary proliferation of inexperienced organizations desiring to
contract with the BPOC. USDA believes that a minimum level of
experience within an organization is beneficial. To achieve both goals,
this proposal would amend Sec. 1260.113 ``Established national non-
profit industry-governed organizations'' by replacing the existing
language under paragraph (c) to read ``have been active or ongoing for
at least two years.''
In 2006, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) and the
American Farm Bureau initiated the Industry-Wide Beef Checkoff
Taskforce (Taskforce) to review, study, and recommend enhancements to
the Beef Checkoff program for the purpose of strengthening the Beef
Checkoff Program for the common good of the beef industry. The
Taskforce included producer and industry representatives and
representatives from national organizations, while USDA took on an
advisory role during meetings. The Taskforce issued a report in
September 2006, which included a recommendation to eliminate section
1260.113(c) in order to make the Beef Checkoff more inclusive. USDA
believes that permitting a greater number of organizations to contract
with the BPOC could bring new perspectives to the contracting process.
In February 2008 at the Cattle Industry Annual Convention, leaders
of the Cattlemen's Beef Board (Board) asked AMS officials if the Board
could conduct a program review. The industry officials believed that it
would be in the best interest of the Beef Checkoff Program to conduct a
review of the operations to determine if there are any changes that
need to or could be made in program operations, the Act, or Order that
would facilitate a more effective Beef Checkoff Program. Included in
the Board's subsequent January 2009 recommendations to AMS was a
recommendation for a statutory amendment intended to result in an
expansion of the contracting authority to organizations created after
the 1986 enactment of the Act.
Finally, a meeting was held in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on September
27, 2011, attended by many industry stakeholders and co-hosted by the
U.S. Cattlemen's Association and the National Farmers Union as
requested by the Secretary. The goal of the meeting
[[Page 12754]]
was to bring more broad-based producer support to the Beef Checkoff
program through a discussion of issues regarding Beef Checkoff
administration and to provide the Secretary with recommendations that
would enhance support for the Beef Checkoff. Many major Beef Checkoff
industry stakeholders attended, including the American National
Cattlewomen, American Veal Association, Livestock Marketing
Association, NCBA, National Livestock Producers Association, and
Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America
(R-CALF). Representatives from the AMS also attended the meeting, as
did the Chief Executive Officer and Producer Chairman of the Board.
As a result of that meeting, the Secretary received a joint letter
signed by most of the organizations in attendance. The letter requested
that USDA amend Beef Checkoff regulations to expand the contracting
authority as authorized under the Act and Order by permitting
organizations that are active and ongoing for at least two years to
contract with the BPOC.
Conclusion
A greater number of beef industry organizations exist now than did
at the time the Order was issued. The Beef Checkoff Program could
benefit from the perspectives and skills of some of these organizations
that are ineligible solely because they were formed after the enactment
of the Act. For several years, the beef industry has been recommending
expanding the eligibility of organizations to contract with the BPOC in
order to enhance the Beef Checkoff Program. Amending the Order would
allow the BPOC to contract with organizations possessing the requisite
experience, skills and information related to the marketing of beef and
beef products, as is intended under the Act.
A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. Sixty days is deemed appropriate to
facilitate the orderly and thoughtful consideration of this proposal.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1260
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Imports, Marketing agreement, Meat and meat products,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, it is proposed that 7
CFR part 1260 be amended as follows:
PART 1260--BEEF PROMOTION AND RESEARCH
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1260 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2901-2911 and 7 U.S.C. 7401.
2. In Sec. 1260.113, paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1260.113 Established national non-profit industry-governed
organizations.
* * * * *
(c) Have been active and ongoing for at least two years.
Dated: February 28, 2012.
Robert C. Keeney,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-5145 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P