Record of Decision for the General Management Plan/Abbreviated Final Environmental Impact Statement for New River Gorge National River, West Virginia, 12877-12878 [2012-5096]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2012 / Notices
Description of Respondents:
Businesses, individuals, and nonprofit
organizations.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Frequency of Collection: On Occasion.
Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 20.
Completion Time per Response: 80
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,600.
Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden
Cost: $5,000—There are no costs
associated with preparing and
submitting an application, other than
expenses for printing, which is
estimated to be approximately $250 per
application (with 20 applications [$250
× 20 = $5,000]).
III. Comments
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
We invite comments concerning this
IC on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Please note that the comments
submitted in response to this notice are
a matter of public record. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: February 28, 2012.
Madonna L. Baucum,
Acting Information Collection Clearance
Officer, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–5158 Filed 3–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–52–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Mar 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–NER–HPPC–1220–9136; 4780–NERI–
409]
Record of Decision for the General
Management Plan/Abbreviated Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
New River Gorge National River, West
Virginia
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
announces the availability of the Record
of Decision for the Abbreviated Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the
General Management Plan for New
River Gorge National River, West
Virginia. The Record of Decision selects
the approved general management plan
for New River Gorge National River for
the next 15 to 20 years.
ADDRESSES: A printed copy of the
Record of Decision may be obtained by
contacting Superintendent Don Striker,
New River Gorge National River, P.O.
Box 246, Glen Jean, West Virginia
25846; (304) 465–0508;
NERI_Superintendent@nps.gov. An
electronic copy of the Record of
Decision can be downloaded from the
NPS Planning, Environment and Public
Comment (PEPC) Web site (https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/neri).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 7, 2011, the Regional Director
of the National Park Service (NPS)
Northeast Region signed the Record of
Decision selecting Alternative 5 as the
approved General Management Plan for
New River Gorge National River.
Alternative 5 was identified as the NPS
preferred alternative in the General
Management Plan and Abbreviated
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(GMP/EIS) issued on October 7, 2011.
The Record of Decision includes:
• A statement of the decision made;
• A synopsis of other alternatives
considered;
• The basis for the decision;
• A description of the
environmentally preferable alternative;
• A listing of measures to minimize
environmental harm; and
• An overview of public involvement
in the decision-making process.
The approved General Management
Plan will guide long-term management
of the New River Gorge National River.
As soon as feasible, we will begin to
implement the selected alternative.
The purpose of a General
Management Plan is to provide a
decision-making framework that ensures
that management decisions effectively
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12877
and efficiently carry out our mission for
the next 15 to 20 years. The GMP/EIS
planning process at New River Gorge
National River allowed us to respond to
new issues and changing conditions and
revise the prior GMP approved in 1982.
This planning process was initiated in
2005 and conducted with extensive
public and agency involvement. The
planning team held meetings with and/
or contacted key stakeholders, agencies,
tribes, resource experts, and members of
the public throughout 2005 and 2006.
Stakeholders, agencies, and the
interested public were briefed with
newsletters and press releases and
provided the opportunities to provide
input at fifteen public meetings held in
2006 and 2007.
Review Process for the Management
Plan and Environmental Impact
Statement
Consistent with Federal laws and
regulations, and with National Park
Service policies, the Draft GMP/EIS was
released for public review and comment
from January 13, 2010, through April 16,
2010. The Draft GMP/EIS described and
analyzed the environmental impact of
five alternatives to guide the
development and future management of
the National River: Alternative 1, the
No-Action Alternative, and Action
Alternatives 2–5. Action Alternative 5,
the NPS Preferred Alternative, would:
• Preserve areas for primitive
recreational experiences from end to
end of the park;
• Intersperse cultural and interpretive
resource focal areas;
• Establish a north-south, throughpark connector of scenic roads and
trails;
• Develop partnerships with gateway
communities; and
• Improve rim-to-river experiences.
Copies of the Draft GMP/EIS were
sent to individuals, agencies, tribes, and
organizations, and were made available
to the public at the park office, by
request, and on our Planning,
Environment and Public Comment
(PEPC) Web site (https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/neri). Public open
houses were held on March 9, 10, and
11, 2010 in Hinton, Beckley, and
Fayetteville, WV, respectively.
The comments received on the Draft
GMP/EIS required only minor responses
and editorial corrections; thus, an
abbreviated format was used for the
Final GMP/EIS. The Abbreviated Final
GMP/EIS, issued on October 7, 2011,
included an analysis of agency and
public comments received on the Draft
GMP/EIS with NPS responses, errata
sheets detailing editorial corrections to
the Draft GMP/EIS, and copies of agency
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
12878
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 42 / Friday, March 2, 2012 / Notices
and substantive public comments. No
changes were made to the alternatives or
to the impact analysis presented in the
Draft GMP/EIS. Therefore, Action
Alternative 5 remained as the NPS
Preferred Alternative and the
environmentally preferred alternative.
Why NPS Selected Alternative 5
We selected Alternative 5 because it
best fulfills the purposes of the park and
conveys the greatest number of
beneficial results in comparison with
the other alternatives. The selected
alternative:
• Results in major beneficial impacts
to natural and scenic resources,
primarily as a result of managing large
areas of the park as unfragmented
backcountry forest.
• Addresses the long-term
preservation needs of the park’s cultural
resources and, through the park’s
leasing program, provides an income
stream for their long-term maintenance.
• Emphasizes primitive recreational
experiences throughout the park and
along the new through-park connector
by linking portions of scenic roads and
trails along the length of the park. In the
long term, we will develop additional
segments of trail limited to hiking/
biking only to create a through park
trail. New facilities will expand visitor
opportunities in the vicinity of river
gateway communities and in focal areas.
• Addresses the majority of visitor
use issues and provides the greatest
direct and indirect economic impact in
terms of jobs, earnings, NPS spending,
and visitor spending. More aggressive
partnering with gateway communities
will better enhance relevance of the
park to local visitors and better enable
us to respond to concerns of local
residents about how the park is
managed.
The Abbreviated Final GMP/EIS and
the Draft GMP/EIS constitute the
principal documentation upon which
this Record of Decision is based.
Dated: February 10, 2012.
Dennis R. Reidenbach,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National
Park Service.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2012–5096 Filed 3–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–YP–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Mar 01, 2012
Jkt 226001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–AKR–DENA; 9831–SZP]
Denali National Park and Preserve
Aircraft Overflights Advisory Council;
Meeting
Notice of meeting for the Denali
National Park and Preserve Aircraft
Overflights Advisory Council within the
Alaska Region.
ACTION:
The National Park Service
(NPS) announces a meeting of the
Denali National Park and Preserve
Aircraft Overflights Advisory Council.
The purpose of this meeting is to
discuss mitigation of impacts from
aircraft overflights at Denali National
Park and Preserve. The Aircraft
Overflights Advisory Council is
authorized to operate in accordance
with the provisions of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act.
Public Availability of Comments:
These meetings are open to the public
and will have time allocated for public
testimony. The public is welcome to
present written or oral comments to the
Aircraft Overflights Advisory Council.
Each meeting will be recorded and
meeting minutes will be available upon
request from the park superintendent for
public inspection approximately six
weeks after each meeting. Before
including your address, telephone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
DATES: The Denali National Park and
Preserve Aircraft Overflights Advisory
Council meeting will be held on
Monday, February 27th and Tuesday,
February 28th, 2012, from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., Alaska Standard Time. The
meeting may end early if all business is
completed.
Location: Residence Inn Anchorage
Midtown, 1025 35th Avenue,
Anchorage, AK 99508. Telephone (907)
563–9844.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Miriam Valentine, Denali Planning.
Email: Miriam_Valentine@nps.gov.
Telephone: (907) 733–9102 at Denali
National Park, Talkeetna Ranger Station,
P.O. Box 588, Talkeetna, AK 99676. For
accessibility requirements please call
Miriam Valentine at (907) 733–9102.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Meeting
location and dates may need to be
changed based on weather or local
circumstances. If the meeting dates and
location are changed, notice of the new
meeting will be announced on local
radio stations and published in local
newspapers.
The agenda for the meetings will
include the following, subject to minor
adjustments:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Monday, February 27th, 2012
1. All day work session with the public.
Tuesday, February 28th, 2012
1. Call to order.
2. Roll Call and Confirmation of
Quorum.
3. Chair’s Welcome and Introductions.
4. Review and Approve Agenda.
5. Member Reports.
6. Agency and Public Comments.
7. Superintendent and NPS Staff
Reports.
8. Agency and Public Comments.
9. Other New Business.
10. Agency and Public Comments.
11. Set time and place of next Advisory
Council meeting.
12. Adjournment.
Sue E. Masica,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2012–5099 Filed 3–1–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–PF–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–0212–9551; 2200–
3200–665]
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
and Related Actions
Nominations for the following
properties being considered for listing
or related actions in the National
Register were received by the National
Park Service before February 11, 2012.
Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part
60, written comments are being
accepted concerning the significance of
the nominated properties under the
National Register criteria for evaluation.
Comments may be forwarded by United
States Postal Service, to the National
Register of Historic Places, National
Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., MS 2280,
Washington, DC 20240; by all other
carriers, National Register of Historic
Places, National Park Service,1201 Eye
St. NW., 8th Floor, Washington DC
20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written
or faxed comments should be submitted
by March 19, 2012. Before including
your address, phone number, email
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12877-12878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5096]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-NER-HPPC-1220-9136; 4780-NERI-409]
Record of Decision for the General Management Plan/Abbreviated
Final Environmental Impact Statement for New River Gorge National
River, West Virginia
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service announces the availability of the
Record of Decision for the Abbreviated Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the General Management Plan for New River Gorge National
River, West Virginia. The Record of Decision selects the approved
general management plan for New River Gorge National River for the next
15 to 20 years.
ADDRESSES: A printed copy of the Record of Decision may be obtained by
contacting Superintendent Don Striker, New River Gorge National River,
P.O. Box 246, Glen Jean, West Virginia 25846; (304) 465-0508; NERI_Superintendent@nps.gov. An electronic copy of the Record of Decision
can be downloaded from the NPS Planning, Environment and Public Comment
(PEPC) Web site (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/neri).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 7, 2011, the Regional Director
of the National Park Service (NPS) Northeast Region signed the Record
of Decision selecting Alternative 5 as the approved General Management
Plan for New River Gorge National River. Alternative 5 was identified
as the NPS preferred alternative in the General Management Plan and
Abbreviated Final Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/EIS) issued on
October 7, 2011. The Record of Decision includes:
A statement of the decision made;
A synopsis of other alternatives considered;
The basis for the decision;
A description of the environmentally preferable
alternative;
A listing of measures to minimize environmental harm; and
An overview of public involvement in the decision-making
process.
The approved General Management Plan will guide long-term
management of the New River Gorge National River. As soon as feasible,
we will begin to implement the selected alternative.
The purpose of a General Management Plan is to provide a decision-
making framework that ensures that management decisions effectively and
efficiently carry out our mission for the next 15 to 20 years. The GMP/
EIS planning process at New River Gorge National River allowed us to
respond to new issues and changing conditions and revise the prior GMP
approved in 1982. This planning process was initiated in 2005 and
conducted with extensive public and agency involvement. The planning
team held meetings with and/or contacted key stakeholders, agencies,
tribes, resource experts, and members of the public throughout 2005 and
2006. Stakeholders, agencies, and the interested public were briefed
with newsletters and press releases and provided the opportunities to
provide input at fifteen public meetings held in 2006 and 2007.
Review Process for the Management Plan and Environmental Impact
Statement
Consistent with Federal laws and regulations, and with National
Park Service policies, the Draft GMP/EIS was released for public review
and comment from January 13, 2010, through April 16, 2010. The Draft
GMP/EIS described and analyzed the environmental impact of five
alternatives to guide the development and future management of the
National River: Alternative 1, the No-Action Alternative, and Action
Alternatives 2-5. Action Alternative 5, the NPS Preferred Alternative,
would:
Preserve areas for primitive recreational experiences from
end to end of the park;
Intersperse cultural and interpretive resource focal
areas;
Establish a north-south, through-park connector of scenic
roads and trails;
Develop partnerships with gateway communities; and
Improve rim-to-river experiences.
Copies of the Draft GMP/EIS were sent to individuals, agencies,
tribes, and organizations, and were made available to the public at the
park office, by request, and on our Planning, Environment and Public
Comment (PEPC) Web site (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/neri). Public open
houses were held on March 9, 10, and 11, 2010 in Hinton, Beckley, and
Fayetteville, WV, respectively.
The comments received on the Draft GMP/EIS required only minor
responses and editorial corrections; thus, an abbreviated format was
used for the Final GMP/EIS. The Abbreviated Final GMP/EIS, issued on
October 7, 2011, included an analysis of agency and public comments
received on the Draft GMP/EIS with NPS responses, errata sheets
detailing editorial corrections to the Draft GMP/EIS, and copies of
agency
[[Page 12878]]
and substantive public comments. No changes were made to the
alternatives or to the impact analysis presented in the Draft GMP/EIS.
Therefore, Action Alternative 5 remained as the NPS Preferred
Alternative and the environmentally preferred alternative.
Why NPS Selected Alternative 5
We selected Alternative 5 because it best fulfills the purposes of
the park and conveys the greatest number of beneficial results in
comparison with the other alternatives. The selected alternative:
Results in major beneficial impacts to natural and scenic
resources, primarily as a result of managing large areas of the park as
unfragmented backcountry forest.
Addresses the long-term preservation needs of the park's
cultural resources and, through the park's leasing program, provides an
income stream for their long-term maintenance.
Emphasizes primitive recreational experiences throughout
the park and along the new through-park connector by linking portions
of scenic roads and trails along the length of the park. In the long
term, we will develop additional segments of trail limited to hiking/
biking only to create a through park trail. New facilities will expand
visitor opportunities in the vicinity of river gateway communities and
in focal areas.
Addresses the majority of visitor use issues and provides
the greatest direct and indirect economic impact in terms of jobs,
earnings, NPS spending, and visitor spending. More aggressive
partnering with gateway communities will better enhance relevance of
the park to local visitors and better enable us to respond to concerns
of local residents about how the park is managed.
The Abbreviated Final GMP/EIS and the Draft GMP/EIS constitute the
principal documentation upon which this Record of Decision is based.
Dated: February 10, 2012.
Dennis R. Reidenbach,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-5096 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-YP-P