Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Site-Specific Invasive Plant Treatment Project and Forest Plan Amendment Number 28, 12002-12004 [2012-4628]
Download as PDF
12002
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 39 / Tuesday, February 28, 2012 / Notices
Done in Washington, DC this 22nd day of
February 2012.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–4648 Filed 2–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
[Docket No. FCIC–12–0002]
Notice of Request for Extension of a
Currently Approved Information
Collection
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Extension of approval of an
information collection; comment
request.
AGENCY:
Note: With the renewal of this package, we
are changing the title of the current
information collection from General
Administrative Regulations; Interpretations
of Statutory and Regulatory Provisions to
Interpretations of Statutory and Regulatory
Provision and Written Interpretations of FCIC
Procedures.
This notice announces a
public comment period on the
information collection requests (ICRs)
associated with the interpretation of
statutory and regulatory provisions
administered by Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC).
DATES: Written comments on this notice
will be accepted until close of business
April 30, 2012.
ADDRESSES: FCIC prefers that comments
be submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. You may
submit comments, identified by Docket
ID No. FCIC–12–0002, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• By Mail to: Michael A. Alston,
Deputy Administrator Insurance
Services Division, Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation, United States
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Ave. SW., Stop 0805,
Washington, DC 20250–0805.
All comments received, including
those received by mail, will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, and can
be accessed by the public. All comments
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this rule.
For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information,
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:10 Feb 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
see https://www.regulations.gov. If you
are submitting comments electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
and want to attach a document, we ask
that it be in a text-based format. If you
want to attach a document that is a
scanned Adobe PDF file, it must be
scanned as text and not as an image,
thus allowing FCIC to search and copy
certain portions of your submission. For
questions regarding attaching a
document that is a scanned Adobe PDF
file, please contact the RMA Web
Content Team at (816) 823–4694 or by
email at rmaweb.content@rma.usda.gov.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received for any dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business,
labor union, etc.). You may review the
complete User Notice and Privacy
Notice for Regulations.gov at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Interpretations of Statutory and
Regulatory Provisions and Written
Interpretations of FCIC Procedures.
OMB Number: 0563–0055.
Expiration Date of Approval: March
31, 2012.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: FCIC is proposing to renew
the currently approved information
collection, OMB Number 0563–0055. It
is currently up for renewal and
extension for three years. The
information collection requirements for
this renewal package are necessary for
FCIC to provide an interpretation of
statutory and regulatory provisions
upon request. This data is used to
administer the provisions of 7 CFR part
400, subpart X in accordance with the
Federal Crop Insurance Act, as
amended. In addition, FCIC has
reevaluated the current package and
included requests for written
interpretation of FCIC procedures.
We are asking the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
extend its approval of our use of this
information collection activity for an
additional 3 years.
The purpose of this notice is to solicit
comments from the public concerning
this information collection activity.
These comments will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information has practical
utility;
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, through use, as
appropriate, of automated, electronic,
mechanical, and other collection
technologies, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Estimate of burden: The public
reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 8.47
hours per response.
Respondents/Affected Entities: Parties
affected by the information collection
requirements included in this Notice are
any producer with a valid crop
insurance policy and approved
insurance provider (agents, loss
adjusters, employees, contractors or
lawyers) with agreement with FCIC.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 95.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 1.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 95.
Estimated total annual burden hours
on respondents: 805.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Signed in Washington, DC on February 17,
2012.
William J. Murphy,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2012–4467 Filed 2–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National
Forest Site-Specific Invasive Plant
Treatment Project and Forest Plan
Amendment Number 28
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Invasive plants are currently
damaging the ecological integrity of
lands within and outside these
administrative units. New tools and
management techniques became
available with the Pacific Northwest
Region Invasive Plant Program,
Preventing and Managing Invasive
Plants, Final Environmental Impact
Statement (USFS 2005a, R6 2005 FEIS),
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 39 / Tuesday, February 28, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
and Record of Decision (USFS 2005b,
R6 2005 ROD). The Proposed Action
would allow for use of these tools,
including additional herbicides and
application methods to increase
treatment effectiveness. A Forest Plan
amendment is proposed to allow the use
of aminopyralid (Milestone®).
DATES: Scoping input must be received
by April 2, 2012, 30 days from the date
of publication in the Federal Register.
The draft environmental impact
statement is expected to be published
Summer 2012 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected approximately January 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Attn: Laura Potash, Mt. BakerSnoqualmie National Forest, 2930
Wetmore Avenue, Suite 3A, Everett,
Washington 98201. Comments may also
be sent via email to
mbs_invasiveplantNEPA@fs.fed.us (note
underscore after mbs) or via facsimile to
(425) 783–0212. Comments received in
response to this solicitation, including
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be part of the public
record for this proposed action.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered, however.
No public meetings concerning the
project are scheduled at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Potash, Project Leader, at (425)
783–6043.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
There is a need for improved
effectiveness in eradicating, controlling
and containing invasive plants on the
Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest.
The current Forest-wide treatment
approach pre-dates the Pacific
Northwest Region Invasive Plant
Program, Preventing and Managing
Invasive Plants Record of Decision (R6
2005 ROD). The R6 2005 ROD amended
the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie (MBS)
Forest Plan by adding management
direction for invasive plants and
authorizing new tools to increase
treatment efficacy and reduce potential
adverse effects of treatment.
The current program needs to be
updated so that goals for invasive plant
management can be met.
As directed by the Forest Service
Manual 2080, the Forests are applying
the principles of Integrated Weed
Management (IWM). IWM is an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:10 Feb 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
interdisciplinary pest management
approach by which one selects and
applies a combination of management
techniques that, together, control a
particular invasive plant species or
infestation efficiently and effectively,
with minimum adverse impacts to nontarget organisms.
Since the publication of the R6 2005
ROD, a new chemical, aminopyralid,
has been found to have lower risk to
aquatic organisms than previously
approved herbicides and higher
effectiveness on particular invasive
plants. Thus, a Forest Plan amendment
is proposed to allow the use of
aminopyralid. In addition, since 2005,
invasive plant sites have been located in
wilderness areas.
The purpose of the project is to
control invasive plants in the most
effective manner possible while
minimizing adverse impacts to people
and the environment.
In 2005, there were approximately 90
known target species sites, and most of
the sites were smaller than 0.1 acre. The
2012 inventory estimates about 968
individual sites, totaling approximately
5,250 acres. The current program has
not kept up with the treatment need.
The following site-specific examples
demonstrate why additional herbicides,
methods, and protocols are needed to
improve treatment effectiveness:
1. The annual treatment planning
process does not provide rapid enough
response.
Example: A pit on Road SR 542 was used
for a log deck and waste rock deposit site.
Common comfrey spread into the area; the 5
stems discovered in 2008 nearly tripled in
density in one year.
2. Additional herbicides would
increase effectiveness for 30 of the 37
known target species on the Forest.
Example: Darrington end of Mountain
Loop; over 100 gallons glyphosate has been
applied in the five years from 2006 through
2010; 23 gallons were applied in 2010, and
target species population continues to
increase.
3. The ability to broadcast would
increase effectiveness in continuous
invaded areas where plant density is
greater than about 70 percent.
4. New sites have been detected in
wilderness areas. Three sites are located
in the Wild Sky Wilderness along the
un-decommissioned segment of the
North Fork Skykomish Road 63, which
is now part of the North Fork
Skykomish Trail #1051. Another site is
located on Scorpion Mountain within
the Wild Sky Wilderness. An additional
site occurs within the Glacier Peak
Wilderness boundary, at an old
trailhead beyond the junction with the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12003
Mill Creek Trail. This area was
historically used to unload stock and a
great amount of disturbance occurred
here.
The alternatives will be evaluated for
their ability to cost-effectively treat
invasive plants.
The lower the average cost of a treated
acre, the more acres that can be treated
annually, and the more likely treatment
goals will be met (less infestation over
time). All of the alternatives are
designed to follow R6 2005 ROD
standards to minimize or eliminate
adverse impacts of treatment. The intent
is to increase treatment effectiveness
without any significant risk to people or
the environment.
Public Outreach
On 10/28/2010, the Mt. BakerSnoqualmie National Forest (MBSNF)
mailed government-to-government
notices to local Tribes. On 11/1/2010,
the MBSNF mailed public scoping
notices to interested citizens, groups,
industry, and agencies on the Forest
SOPA mailing list. The notices
summarized the Invasive Plant
Management Project and invited
comments. The January 1, 2011–March
31, 2011 Quarterly Schedule of
Proposed Actions also included the
proposal. The Forest Service received 7
comment letters and 2 telephone
responses to the 11/1/2010 to 12/8/2010
scoping effort. Comments were received
from 3 agencies, 3 organizations and 3
individuals. The scoping notice and
comment letters are available in the
Project Record and need not be
repeated. Two key issues were
identified in the scoping letters: concern
about herbicide toxicity, and concern
about cost-effectiveness of treatments.
The scoping period will extend to April
2, 2012. No public meetings are planned
at this time.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action would allow for
use of additional herbicides and
application methods than currently
available, to increase treatment
effectiveness. A Forest Plan amendment
is proposed to allow the use of
aminopyralid (Milestone®). The
Proposed Action also adds broadcasts
application to the list of approved
application methods for known sites
and the new invader strategy.
Broadcasting is required for a few dense
infestations that cover large areas.
Stream buffers and mitigation measures
would apply to herbicide use, and
certain herbicides would not be
broadcast near streams and other water
bodies. Treatments are proposed
throughout the Forest, including within
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
12004
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 39 / Tuesday, February 28, 2012 / Notices
wilderness areas. The Proposed Action
would modify the current annual
planning process for Early Detection,
Rapid Response (EDRR) (new invader
strategy) and require that sites be
screened by appropriate
interdisciplinary specialists, who would
use the key questions to determine
appropriateness of treatment under
EDRR, and which Management
Requirements and Mitigation Measures
(MR/MM) applies at each new site. The
review team would screen the new
site(s) and prepare a file checklist
demonstrating that treatment would be
within the scope of the NEPA decision.
Proposed control measures have been
identified for each invasive species site
(see https://www.fs.usda.gov/projects/
mbs/landmanagement/projects,
Invasive Plant Management).
Treatments are often a combination of
methods, such as herbicide/manual or
cultural/manual. All treatments would
be done according to Management
Requirements and Mitigation Measures
(MR/MM), intended to minimize risk
and maximize effectiveness.
Possible Alternatives
The Forest Service is considering an
alternative of treating without the use of
aminopyralid and only using the 10
herbicides approved in the R6 2005
ROD. The Forest Service is also
considering an alternative where not all
treatments would be spot treatments
and broadcast would be limited to
existing treatments at Skyiou Island.
The No Action alternative will also be
considered, which would continue the
current invasive plant management
program on the MBS National Forest.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is the MBS
National Forest Supervisor.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will make the
following decisions based on the
interdisciplinary analysis: (1) Whether
or not to authorize site-specific invasive
plant treatments using herbicides and
other methods; (2) whether or not to
implement an Early Detection and
Rapid Response process for infestations
that are detected over the next 5 to 15
years; (3) what MR/MM are required
and (4) what monitoring and adaptive
management will occur.
Permits or Licenses Required
Pesticide application licenses will be
required for those implementing this
project. Pesticide Use Proposals for
wilderness herbicide applications need
to be signed by the Regional Forester,
otherwise Pesticide Use Proposals are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:10 Feb 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
signed by the Forest Supervisor. A
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit is
required for herbicide use into waters of
the United States or adjacent
conveyances with a hydrologic surface
connection to water at the time of
application. Project design features and
buffers are intended to minimize
pollution discharge to the extent
practicable and this project conforms to
current permit requirements. A permit
will be obtained before herbicide is used
within 3 feet of waters of the United
States or flowing ditches that are
connected to the waters of the United
States.
Dated: February 17, 2012.
Rodney Mace,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
General Background
[FR Doc. 2012–4628 Filed 2–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Stanislaus National Forest, CA; Notice
of Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for Candy Rock
Quarry Management
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Stanislaus National
Forest proposes to set permanent
limitations on recreational target
shooting at Candy Rock Quarry near
Hathaway Pines, California. The
purpose of this proposal is to determine
if recreational target shooting is an
appropriate activity at Candy Rock
Quarry in the context of safety, public
health, and applicable law, regulation
and policy. If target shooting is found to
be appropriate, determine the
conditions under which shooting may
continue.
SUMMARY:
Comments on the proposed
action should be submitted within 45
days of the date of publication of this
Notice of Intent. The Forest Service will
hold a public meeting in March 2012.
Completion of the draft environmental
impact statement is expected in Fall
2012 and the final environmental
impact statement is expected in Spring
2013.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to:
Stanislaus National Forest; Attn: Candy
Rock; 19777 Greenley Road; Sonora, CA
95370; (209) 532–3671. Comments may
be submitted by Fax [(209) 533–1890];
or, by hand-delivery to the address
shown above, during normal business
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
hours (Monday–Friday 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m.). Oral comments must be
submitted via telephone by calling (209)
532–3671 ext. 350.
Electronic comments, in acceptable
[plain text (.txt), portable document
format (.pdf), rich text (.rtf) or Word
(.doc)] formats, may be submitted to:
comments-pacificsouthweststanislaus@fs.fed.us with Subject:
Candy Rock.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information regarding this
proposal, contact Sara Friberg,
Stanislaus National Forest, 19777
Greenley Road; Sonora, CA 95370;
phone: (209) 532–3671 ext. 475; or,
email: sfriberg@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Candy Rock Quarry is located on the
Stanislaus National Forest, Calaveras
Ranger District in Calaveras County near
Hathaway Pines, California (Section 20,
T4N R15E). Forest Roads 4N73Y and
4N80Y provide access to the quarry
from Highway 4.
The quarry is in a wildland urban
intermix area, approximately one-third
of a mile from the nearest private
residential properties. It is presently
used as a storage site for tunnel muck
(loose rock ore fragmented during
tunnel creation) deposited between
1986 and 1988 during the construction
of the North Fork Stanislaus River
Hydroelectric Project. The tunnel muck
is used for road surfacing. Prior to being
used as a tunnel muck storage site, the
quarry produced an ornamental
rhyolitic rock called ‘‘candy rock.’’ The
quarry is one of the locations on the
District that recreationists actively use
for target shooting.
Recreational target shooting is
considered a dispersed recreation
activity on the Stanislaus National
Forest. With no designated shooting
ranges on the Forest, shooting is
allowed as long it is conducted in a safe
manner in compliance with Federal
regulations at 36 CFR 261.10(d). Target
shooting has taken place at the Candy
Rock Quarry site since the early 1960s,
predating the placement of the tunnel
muck in the late 1980s, and the
development of most of the nearby
residential lots. Sheriff’s Department
and Forest Service law enforcement
records indicate, over the past three
years, no documented incidents
involving vandalism, vegetation fires or
reports of property damage resulting
from the use of firearms at the quarry
site. Records show one incident of a
self-inflicted gunshot wound, and
several noise complaints. The Calaveras
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12002-12004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4628]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Site-Specific Invasive
Plant Treatment Project and Forest Plan Amendment Number 28
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Invasive plants are currently damaging the ecological
integrity of lands within and outside these administrative units. New
tools and management techniques became available with the Pacific
Northwest Region Invasive Plant Program, Preventing and Managing
Invasive Plants, Final Environmental Impact Statement (USFS 2005a, R6
2005 FEIS),
[[Page 12003]]
and Record of Decision (USFS 2005b, R6 2005 ROD). The Proposed Action
would allow for use of these tools, including additional herbicides and
application methods to increase treatment effectiveness. A Forest Plan
amendment is proposed to allow the use of aminopyralid
(Milestone[supreg]).
DATES: Scoping input must be received by April 2, 2012, 30 days from
the date of publication in the Federal Register. The draft
environmental impact statement is expected to be published Summer 2012
and the final environmental impact statement is expected approximately
January 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Attn: Laura Potash, Mt. Baker-
Snoqualmie National Forest, 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Suite 3A, Everett,
Washington 98201. Comments may also be sent via email to mbs_invasiveplantNEPA@fs.fed.us (note underscore after mbs) or via
facsimile to (425) 783-0212. Comments received in response to this
solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments
submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered, however. No
public meetings concerning the project are scheduled at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Potash, Project Leader, at (425)
783-6043.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
There is a need for improved effectiveness in eradicating,
controlling and containing invasive plants on the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie
National Forest. The current Forest-wide treatment approach pre-dates
the Pacific Northwest Region Invasive Plant Program, Preventing and
Managing Invasive Plants Record of Decision (R6 2005 ROD). The R6 2005
ROD amended the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie (MBS) Forest Plan by adding
management direction for invasive plants and authorizing new tools to
increase treatment efficacy and reduce potential adverse effects of
treatment.
The current program needs to be updated so that goals for invasive
plant management can be met.
As directed by the Forest Service Manual 2080, the Forests are
applying the principles of Integrated Weed Management (IWM). IWM is an
interdisciplinary pest management approach by which one selects and
applies a combination of management techniques that, together, control
a particular invasive plant species or infestation efficiently and
effectively, with minimum adverse impacts to non-target organisms.
Since the publication of the R6 2005 ROD, a new chemical,
aminopyralid, has been found to have lower risk to aquatic organisms
than previously approved herbicides and higher effectiveness on
particular invasive plants. Thus, a Forest Plan amendment is proposed
to allow the use of aminopyralid. In addition, since 2005, invasive
plant sites have been located in wilderness areas.
The purpose of the project is to control invasive plants in the
most effective manner possible while minimizing adverse impacts to
people and the environment.
In 2005, there were approximately 90 known target species sites,
and most of the sites were smaller than 0.1 acre. The 2012 inventory
estimates about 968 individual sites, totaling approximately 5,250
acres. The current program has not kept up with the treatment need.
The following site-specific examples demonstrate why additional
herbicides, methods, and protocols are needed to improve treatment
effectiveness:
1. The annual treatment planning process does not provide rapid
enough response.
Example: A pit on Road SR 542 was used for a log deck and waste
rock deposit site. Common comfrey spread into the area; the 5 stems
discovered in 2008 nearly tripled in density in one year.
2. Additional herbicides would increase effectiveness for 30 of the
37 known target species on the Forest.
Example: Darrington end of Mountain Loop; over 100 gallons
glyphosate has been applied in the five years from 2006 through
2010; 23 gallons were applied in 2010, and target species population
continues to increase.
3. The ability to broadcast would increase effectiveness in
continuous invaded areas where plant density is greater than about 70
percent.
4. New sites have been detected in wilderness areas. Three sites
are located in the Wild Sky Wilderness along the un-decommissioned
segment of the North Fork Skykomish Road 63, which is now part of the
North Fork Skykomish Trail 1051. Another site is located on
Scorpion Mountain within the Wild Sky Wilderness. An additional site
occurs within the Glacier Peak Wilderness boundary, at an old trailhead
beyond the junction with the Mill Creek Trail. This area was
historically used to unload stock and a great amount of disturbance
occurred here.
The alternatives will be evaluated for their ability to cost-
effectively treat invasive plants.
The lower the average cost of a treated acre, the more acres that
can be treated annually, and the more likely treatment goals will be
met (less infestation over time). All of the alternatives are designed
to follow R6 2005 ROD standards to minimize or eliminate adverse
impacts of treatment. The intent is to increase treatment effectiveness
without any significant risk to people or the environment.
Public Outreach
On 10/28/2010, the Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest (MBSNF)
mailed government-to-government notices to local Tribes. On 11/1/2010,
the MBSNF mailed public scoping notices to interested citizens, groups,
industry, and agencies on the Forest SOPA mailing list. The notices
summarized the Invasive Plant Management Project and invited comments.
The January 1, 2011-March 31, 2011 Quarterly Schedule of Proposed
Actions also included the proposal. The Forest Service received 7
comment letters and 2 telephone responses to the 11/1/2010 to 12/8/2010
scoping effort. Comments were received from 3 agencies, 3 organizations
and 3 individuals. The scoping notice and comment letters are available
in the Project Record and need not be repeated. Two key issues were
identified in the scoping letters: concern about herbicide toxicity,
and concern about cost-effectiveness of treatments. The scoping period
will extend to April 2, 2012. No public meetings are planned at this
time.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action would allow for use of additional herbicides
and application methods than currently available, to increase treatment
effectiveness. A Forest Plan amendment is proposed to allow the use of
aminopyralid (Milestone[supreg]). The Proposed Action also adds
broadcasts application to the list of approved application methods for
known sites and the new invader strategy. Broadcasting is required for
a few dense infestations that cover large areas. Stream buffers and
mitigation measures would apply to herbicide use, and certain
herbicides would not be broadcast near streams and other water bodies.
Treatments are proposed throughout the Forest, including within
[[Page 12004]]
wilderness areas. The Proposed Action would modify the current annual
planning process for Early Detection, Rapid Response (EDRR) (new
invader strategy) and require that sites be screened by appropriate
interdisciplinary specialists, who would use the key questions to
determine appropriateness of treatment under EDRR, and which Management
Requirements and Mitigation Measures (MR/MM) applies at each new site.
The review team would screen the new site(s) and prepare a file
checklist demonstrating that treatment would be within the scope of the
NEPA decision. Proposed control measures have been identified for each
invasive species site (see https://www.fs.usda.gov/projects/mbs/landmanagement/projects, Invasive Plant Management). Treatments are
often a combination of methods, such as herbicide/manual or cultural/
manual. All treatments would be done according to Management
Requirements and Mitigation Measures (MR/MM), intended to minimize risk
and maximize effectiveness.
Possible Alternatives
The Forest Service is considering an alternative of treating
without the use of aminopyralid and only using the 10 herbicides
approved in the R6 2005 ROD. The Forest Service is also considering an
alternative where not all treatments would be spot treatments and
broadcast would be limited to existing treatments at Skyiou Island. The
No Action alternative will also be considered, which would continue the
current invasive plant management program on the MBS National Forest.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official is the MBS National Forest Supervisor.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will make the following decisions based on
the interdisciplinary analysis: (1) Whether or not to authorize site-
specific invasive plant treatments using herbicides and other methods;
(2) whether or not to implement an Early Detection and Rapid Response
process for infestations that are detected over the next 5 to 15 years;
(3) what MR/MM are required and (4) what monitoring and adaptive
management will occur.
Permits or Licenses Required
Pesticide application licenses will be required for those
implementing this project. Pesticide Use Proposals for wilderness
herbicide applications need to be signed by the Regional Forester,
otherwise Pesticide Use Proposals are signed by the Forest Supervisor.
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is
required for herbicide use into waters of the United States or adjacent
conveyances with a hydrologic surface connection to water at the time
of application. Project design features and buffers are intended to
minimize pollution discharge to the extent practicable and this project
conforms to current permit requirements. A permit will be obtained
before herbicide is used within 3 feet of waters of the United States
or flowing ditches that are connected to the waters of the United
States.
Dated: February 17, 2012.
Rodney Mace,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2012-4628 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P