Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri, 11748-11750 [2012-4476]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
11748
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 39 / Tuesday, February 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 30, 2012. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See CAA
section 307(b)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Greenhouse gases,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 27, 2012.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR—Tennessee
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended
under Chapter 1200–3–9 by revising the
entry for ‘‘Section 1200–3–9–.01’’ to
read as follows:
■
§ 52.2220
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 1—EPA-APPROVED TENNESSEE REGULATIONS
State citation
State effective date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
Chapter 1200–3–9
Section 1200–3–9–.01 ...
*
*
*
§ 52.2222
Construction Permits ....
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 52.2222 is amended by
removing paragraph (d).
[FR Doc. 2012–4471 Filed 2–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
2/8/2011
2/28/2012 [Insert citation of publication].
*
*
*
Final rule; notice of
administrative change and correction.
ACTION:
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
SUMMARY:
[EPA–R07–OAR–2011–0995; FRL–9634–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
Jkt 226001
*
EPA is approving Tennessee’s May 28, 2009
SIP revisions to Chapter 1200–3–9–.01 with
the exception of the ‘‘baseline actual emissions’’
calculation
revision
found
at
1200–3–9–.01(4)(b)45(i)(III),
(4)(b)45(ii)(IV),
(5)(b)1(xlvii)(I)(III) and (5)(b)1(xlvii)(II)(IV) of
the submittal.
*
AGENCY:
14:48 Feb 27, 2012
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Amended]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Explanation
Construction and Operating Permits
*
■
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
EPA approval date
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA is taking final action on
administrative changes to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) and the
Operating Permits Program. The first
revision is an administrative change that
codifies EPA’s prior approval of a SIP
submission which re-numbers
references to the St. Louis City Code
local ordinance. The second revision is
a correction which reinserts text that
E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM
28FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 39 / Tuesday, February 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
was inadvertently removed and reletters a paragraph which codifies a
recent approval of revisions to
Missouri’s Title V operating permits
program related to the Submission of
Emission Data, Emission Fees and
Process Information.
DATES: This action is effective February
28, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Bhesania at (913) 551–7147, or by
email at bhesania.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Outline
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What action is EPA taking?
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
EPA is taking final action on
administrative changes to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) and the
Operating Permits Program. On April 5,
2011, Missouri submitted a SIP revision
requesting to local ordinance numbers
in the St. Louis City Code. EPA
determined that the revision was a
minor SIP revision without any
substantive changes and complied with
all applicable requirements of the CAA
and EPA regulations concerning such
SIP revisions. EPA approved this
revision through letter notice to
Missouri dated November 23, 2011
consistent with the procedures outlined
in EPA’s Notice of Procedural Changes
on SIP processing published on January
19th, 1989 at 54 FR 2214 and consistent
with the procedures outlined in an
April 6, 2011 memo from Janet McCabe,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for the
Office of Air and Radiation, regarding
Regional Consistency for the
Administrative Requirements of State
Implementation. Today’s action merely
codifies the November 23, 2011
administrative amendment to the SIP.
The second revision is a correction
which reinserts text that was
inadvertently removed and re-letters a
paragraph which codifies a recent
approval of revisions to Missouri’s Title
V operating permits program related to
the Submission of Emission Data,
Emission Fees and Process Information
that was finalized in 76 FR 77701,
December 14, 2011. In that rule, EPA
inadvertently removed the text in 40
CFR part 70, app. A, from paragraph (v)
for Missouri, and replaced it with new
text which was the subject of that rule.
EPA’s intent was to add the new text in
a new paragraph rather than to replace
existing text. This action reinstates the
removed text in paragraph (v) and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:48 Feb 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
moves the current text in paragraph (v)
to new paragraph (z).
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking final action on
administrative changes to the Missouri
SIP and Operating Permits Program.
EPA has determined that today’s action
falls under the ‘‘good cause’’ exemption
in the section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’
authorizes agencies to dispense with
public participation and section
553(d)(3) which allows an agency to
make an action effective immediately
(thereby avoiding the 30-day delayed
effective date otherwise provided for in
the APA). With respect to the SIP
revision described above, today’s
administrative action simply codifies
provisions which are already in effect as
a matter of law in Federal and approved
state programs. With respect to the
revision to the Missouri Title V
operating permit program, this action
merely corrects an error in the
designation of paragraphs reflecting
previously approved revisions to the
Missouri program. Under section 553 of
the APA, an agency may find good
cause where procedures are
‘‘impractical, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Public comment
for this administrative action is
‘‘unnecessary’’ because the revisions are
administrative and non-substantive in
nature. Immediate notice of this action
in the Federal Register benefits the
public by providing the public notice of
the updated Missouri SIP and Title V
program.
Approval of these revisions will
ensure consistency between state and
Federally-approved rules. EPA has
determined that these changes will not
relax the SIP or adversely impact air
emissions.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11749
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM
28FER1
11750
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 39 / Tuesday, February 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 30, 2012. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
PART 52—[AMENDED]
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference.
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Operating permits.
2. In § 52.1320 the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the title, ‘‘St.
Louis City Ordinance 65645’’ to read as
follows.
■
Dated: February 9, 2012.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
§ 52.1320
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective date
Title
EPA approval
date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
St. Louis City Ordinance 68657
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PART 70—[AMENDED]
40 CFR Part 281
3. The authority citation for Part 70
continues to read as follows:
■
[EPA–R10–UST–2011–0896; FRL 9640–1]
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Idaho: Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program
Appendix A—[Amended]
4. Appendix A to Part 70, Missouri, is
amended by redesignating existing
paragraph (v) as new paragraph (z) and
by adding a new paragraph (v) to read
as follows:
■
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval
Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Missouri
*
*
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(v) The Missouri Department of Natural
Resources submitted revisions to Missouri
rule 10 CSR 10–6.110, ‘‘Submission of
Emission Data, Emission Fees, and Process
Information’’ on December 21, 2007;
approval of section (3)(D) effective November
14, 2008.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–4476 Filed 2–27–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final determination.
AGENCY:
The State of Idaho has
applied for final approval of its
underground storage tank program for
petroleum and hazardous substances
under subtitle I of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
The United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed
the State of Idaho’s application and has
made a final determination that the
State of Idaho’s underground storage
tank program for petroleum and
hazardous substances satisfies all of the
requirements necessary to qualify for
final approval. Thus, EPA is granting
final approval to the State of Idaho to
operate its underground storage tank
program for petroleum and hazardous
substances.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: Final approval for
the State of Idaho shall be effective on
February 28, 2012.
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:48 Feb 27, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Erik
Sirs, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 10, 1435 North Orchard,
Boise, ID 83706, phone number: (208)
378–5762, email: sirs.erik@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
Section 9004 of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),
42 U.S.C. 6991c, authorizes EPA to
approve underground storage tank
programs to operate in the State in lieu
of the federal underground storage tank
(UST) program. To qualify for final
approval, a state’s program must be ‘‘no
less stringent’’ than the federal program
in all eight elements set forth at section
9004(a)(1) through (7) and (9) of RCRA,
42 U.S.C. 6991c(a)(1) through (7) and
(9); include the notification
requirements of RCRA section
9004(a)(8) and provide for adequate
enforcement of compliance with UST
standards (section 9004(a) of RCRA, 42
U.S.C. 6991c(a)). Note that the Energy
Policy Act of 2005 added state-specific
operator training requirements as a state
program approval element in section
9004(a)(9). Although, EPA has not yet
established performance criteria in 40
CFR part 281 for making a no-lessstringent determination for the operator
training element, EPA finds Idaho’s
operator training requirements to be
consistent with Operator Training Grant
E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM
28FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 28, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11748-11750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4476]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA-R07-OAR-2011-0995; FRL-9634-8]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; notice of administrative change and correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action on administrative changes to the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) and the Operating Permits Program. The
first revision is an administrative change that codifies EPA's prior
approval of a SIP submission which re-numbers references to the St.
Louis City Code local ordinance. The second revision is a correction
which reinserts text that
[[Page 11749]]
was inadvertently removed and re-letters a paragraph which codifies a
recent approval of revisions to Missouri's Title V operating permits
program related to the Submission of Emission Data, Emission Fees and
Process Information.
DATES: This action is effective February 28, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Bhesania at (913) 551-7147, or by
email at bhesania.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA.
Outline
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is being addressed in this document?
EPA is taking final action on administrative changes to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) and the Operating Permits Program. On April
5, 2011, Missouri submitted a SIP revision requesting to local
ordinance numbers in the St. Louis City Code. EPA determined that the
revision was a minor SIP revision without any substantive changes and
complied with all applicable requirements of the CAA and EPA
regulations concerning such SIP revisions. EPA approved this revision
through letter notice to Missouri dated November 23, 2011 consistent
with the procedures outlined in EPA's Notice of Procedural Changes on
SIP processing published on January 19th, 1989 at 54 FR 2214 and
consistent with the procedures outlined in an April 6, 2011 memo from
Janet McCabe, Deputy Assistant Administrator for the Office of Air and
Radiation, regarding Regional Consistency for the Administrative
Requirements of State Implementation. Today's action merely codifies
the November 23, 2011 administrative amendment to the SIP.
The second revision is a correction which reinserts text that was
inadvertently removed and re-letters a paragraph which codifies a
recent approval of revisions to Missouri's Title V operating permits
program related to the Submission of Emission Data, Emission Fees and
Process Information that was finalized in 76 FR 77701, December 14,
2011. In that rule, EPA inadvertently removed the text in 40 CFR part
70, app. A, from paragraph (v) for Missouri, and replaced it with new
text which was the subject of that rule. EPA's intent was to add the
new text in a new paragraph rather than to replace existing text. This
action reinstates the removed text in paragraph (v) and moves the
current text in paragraph (v) to new paragraph (z).
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking final action on administrative changes to the
Missouri SIP and Operating Permits Program. EPA has determined that
today's action falls under the ``good cause'' exemption in the section
553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) which, upon
finding ``good cause,'' authorizes agencies to dispense with public
participation and section 553(d)(3) which allows an agency to make an
action effective immediately (thereby avoiding the 30-day delayed
effective date otherwise provided for in the APA). With respect to the
SIP revision described above, today's administrative action simply
codifies provisions which are already in effect as a matter of law in
Federal and approved state programs. With respect to the revision to
the Missouri Title V operating permit program, this action merely
corrects an error in the designation of paragraphs reflecting
previously approved revisions to the Missouri program. Under section
553 of the APA, an agency may find good cause where procedures are
``impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.''
Public comment for this administrative action is ``unnecessary''
because the revisions are administrative and non-substantive in nature.
Immediate notice of this action in the Federal Register benefits the
public by providing the public notice of the updated Missouri SIP and
Title V program.
Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency between state
and Federally-approved rules. EPA has determined that these changes
will not relax the SIP or adversely impact air emissions.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to
approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this
[[Page 11750]]
action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by April 30, 2012. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference.
40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Operating permits.
Dated: February 9, 2012.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the title, ``St. Louis City Ordinance 65645'' to read as follows.
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective
Missouri citation Title date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
St. Louis City Ordinance 68657
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 70--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for Part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Appendix A--[Amended]
0
4. Appendix A to Part 70, Missouri, is amended by redesignating
existing paragraph (v) as new paragraph (z) and by adding a new
paragraph (v) to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
* * * * *
Missouri
* * * * *
(v) The Missouri Department of Natural Resources submitted
revisions to Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.110, ``Submission of Emission
Data, Emission Fees, and Process Information'' on December 21, 2007;
approval of section (3)(D) effective November 14, 2008.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-4476 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
