Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 11541-11543 [2012-4557]

Download as PDF 11541 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Form name Student Program Participant ................ Student Outcome Survey Baseline Attachment D. Student Outcome Survey Mid-Term Attachment F. Student Outcome Survey Follow-up Attachment E. School Indicators Attachment G: ........................ Parent Outcome Baseline Survey Attachment H Parent Outcome Follow-up Survey Attachment EEEE. Educator Outcome Survey Attachment I ............ Brand Ambassador Implementation Survey Attachment J. School Leadership Capacity and Readiness Survey Attachment K. Parent Program Fidelity 6th Grade Session 1– Session 6 Attachment L–Q. Parent Program Fidelity 7th Grade Session 1, 3, 5 Attachment R–T. Student Program Fidelity 6th Grade Session 1– Session 6 Attachment U–Z. Student Program Fidelity 7th Grade Session 1– Session 7 Attachment AA–GG. Student Program Fidelity 8th Grade Session 1– Session 10 (comprehensive) Attachment HH– QQ. Communications Campaign Tracking Attachment RR. Local Health Department Capacity and Readiness Attachment SS. Student participant focus group guide (time spent in focus group) Attachment ZZ. Student curricula implementer focus group guide (time spent in focus group) Attachment AAA. Parent curricula implementer focus group guide (time spent in focus group) Attachment BBB. Safe Dates 8th Grade Session 1–Session 10 (standard) Attachment CCC–LLL. Student program master trainer TA form Attachment DDDD. Student Program Participant ................ Student Program Participant ................ School data extractor ........................... Parent Program Participant .................. Parent Program Participant .................. Educator ............................................... Student Brand ambassador .................. School leadership ................................. Parent Curricula Implementer .............. Parent Curricula Implementer .............. Student Curricula Implementer ............. Student Curricula Implementer ............. Student Curricula Implementer ............. Communications Coordinator ............... Local Health Department Representative. Student Program Participant ................ Student Curricula Implementer ............. Parent Curricula Implementer .............. Student Curricula Implementer ............. Student Master Trainer ......................... Dated: February 21, 2012. Kimberly S. Lane, Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2012–4561 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [60Day-12–12EV] Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:10 Feb 24, 2012 Jkt 226001 proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404–639–7570 and send comments to Kimberly S. Lane, CDC Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton Road MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Number of responses per respondent Number of respondents Type of respondent Sfmt 4703 Average burden per response (hours) 15,048 1 45/60 14,652 1 45/60 14,256 1 45/60 44 2,424 2,181 342 1 1 15/60 1 1 1,584 80 2 2 30/60 20/60 22 1 1 264 3 15/60 132 3 15/60 924 1 15/60 1078 1 15/60 1540 1 15/60 4 4 20/60 16 1 2 80 1 1.5 80 1 1 80 1 1 1540 1 15/60 12 50 10/60 burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Proposed Project Ensuring compliance with the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard among Non-Hospital Healthcare Facilities— New—National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that healthcare workers sustain nearly 600,000 percutaneous injuries annually involving contaminated sharps. In E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM 27FEN1 11542 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices response to both the continued concern over such exposures and the technological developments which can increase employee protection, Congress passed the Needle-stick Safety and Prevention Act directing OSHA to revise the blood borne pathogens (BBP) standard to establish requirements that employers identify and make use of effective and safer medical devices. That revision was published on January 18, 2001, and became effective April 18, 2001. The revision to OSHA’s blood-borne pathogens standard added new requirements for employers, including additions to the exposure control plan and maintenance of a sharps injury log. OSHA has determined that compliance with these standards significantly reduces the risk that workers will contract a blood-borne disease in the course of their work. However, blood-borne pathogens programs, policies, and standards for health care workers are based primarily on hospital data. Approximately onehalf of the 11 million health care workers in the United States are employed in non-hospital-based settings, such as physician offices, home healthcare agencies, correctional facilities, or dental offices and clinics. Little information is known about the risk management practices in these nonhospital settings. A small study conducted by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found that although seven of the eight correctional health care facilities visited had written exposure control plans, only two were reviewed and updated annually as required by the OSHA BBP Standard. One reason consultants, researchers, clinicians, industry representatives, and other interested persons with a collective mission to be the world’s leading advocate for the safe and infection-free delivery of oral care. OSAP supports this commitment to dental workers and the public through quality education and information dissemination. OSAP’s unique membership includes the variety of partners critical to gather the data on compliance with the OSHA bloodborne pathogens standard, identify barriers and develop strategies to overcome barriers to compliance. OSAP will be conducting a Web survey of private dental practices in the United States. Information collected will include current level of existing exposure control plans in various dental healthcare settings; whether the plan or other resource is actively used to prevent occupation exposures; available resources and barriers to use such as relevant education materials, knowledge, costs, and availability. OSAP is working with a publishing partner that has a double-opt-in email distribution list of 45,419 dentists. The dentists in the email list represent every state in the country. The list represents 32% of the total population of working dentists in the United States. The average open rate for this list is 12.76%, which would represent 5,768 dentists. The targeted number of completed questionnaires is estimated at about 566 (10% participation rate is assumed since there will be an incentive and one reminder). The survey is estimated to take about 10 minutes for respondents to complete. There are no costs to the respondents other than their time. postulated for non-compliance was that hospital-based standards, policies, and programs may not be appropriate to non-hospital settings. It is important to identify effective methods for using exposure control plans in non-hospital settings and to verify whether the specificity and relevance of bloodborne pathogen training and educational materials for non-hospital facilities can positively impact compliance in dental settings. The purposes of this proposal are to insure that bloodborne pathogens exposure control plans are effectively implemented in private dental offices and dental clinics, an important segment of the non-hospital based healthcare system; and to understand how effective implementation strategies may be applied to other healthcare settings. The proposed work will draw on research-to-practice principles and will be assisted by a strong network of dental professional groups, trade associations, and government agencies. Specific objectives are to: (1) inventory existing exposure control plans in dental healthcare settings. (2) determine if the exposure control plan or other resource is actively used to prevent occupational exposures. (3) determine available resources and barriers to use such as relevant educational materials, knowledge, costs, availability, etc. (4) develop strategies to overcome key barriers to compliance. (5) report lessons learned applicable to the entire health sector. The Organization for Safety, Asepsis and Prevention (OSAP) is a unique group of dental educators and ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of respondents Type of respondents Form name Private Dental Practices ................... BBP Exposure Control Plan Survey Total ........................................... ........................................................... Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hrs) 566 1 10/60 94 ........................ ........................ ........................ 94 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Kimberly S. Lane, Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2012–4557 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:27 Feb 24, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Total burden (in hrs) Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM 27FEN1 11543 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices preventable causes of mortality, morbidity, and social problems among both youth and young adults in the United States. Data on health risk behaviors of adolescents are the focus of approximately 65 national health objectives in Healthy People 2020, an initiative of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The YRBS provides data to measure 20 of the health objectives and 1 of the Leading Health Indicators established by Healthy People 2020. In addition, the YRBS can identify racial and ethnic disparities in health risk behaviors. No other national source of data measures as many of the Healthy People 2020 objectives addressing adolescent health risk behaviors as the YRBS. The data also will have significant implications for policy and program development for school health programs nationwide. burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60Day–12–0493] Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404–639–7570 and send comments to Kimberly Lane, CDC Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the Proposed Project 2013 and 2015 National Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (YRBS)(OMB No. 0920–0493)—Reinstatement with change—National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description The purpose of this request is to obtain OMB approval to reinstate with change, the data collection for the National Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), a school-based survey that has been conducted biennially since 1991. OMB approval for the 2009 YRBS and 2011 YRBS expired November 30, 2011 (OMB no. 0920–0493). CDC seeks a three-year approval to conduct the YRBS in Spring 2013 and Spring 2015. Minor changes incorporated into this reinstatement request include: An updated title for the information collection to accurately reflect the years in which the survey will be conducted and minor changes to the data collection instrument. The YRBS assesses priority health risk behaviors related to the major In Spring 2013 and Spring 2015, the YRBS will be conducted among nationally representative samples of students attending public and private schools in grades 9–12. Information supporting the YRBS also will be collected from state-, district-, and school-level administrators and teachers. The table below reports the number of respondents annualized over the 3-year project period. There are no costs to respondents except their time. The total estimated annualized burden hours are 6,215. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of respondents Type of respondent Form name State Administrators .......................... Students ............................................ State-level Recruitment Script for the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. District-level Recruitment Script for the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. School-level Recruitment Script for the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Data Collection Checklist for the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Youth Risk Behavior Survey ............ Total Burden .............................. ........................................................... District Administrators ....................... School Administrators ....................... srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Teachers ........................................... Number of responses per respondent Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 30 60 ⁄ 40 ⁄ 67 ⁄ 100 45 60 ⁄ 6,000 ........................ 6,215 30 60 80 1 133 1 30 60 400 1 15 60 8,000 1 ........................ ........................ BILLING CODE 4163–18–P 19:27 Feb 24, 2012 8 1 [FR Doc. 2012–4553 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am] Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM 27FEN1 Total burden (in hours) ⁄ 17 Kimberly Lane, Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. VerDate Mar<15>2010 Average burden per response (in hours)

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11541-11543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60Day-12-12EV]


Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

    In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on 
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. 
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a 
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-7570 
and send comments to Kimberly S. Lane, CDC Reports Clearance Officer, 
1600 Clifton Road MS-D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to 
omb@cdc.gov.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology. Written comments should be received 
within 60 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Ensuring compliance with the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard 
among Non-Hospital Healthcare Facilities--New--National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that 
healthcare workers sustain nearly 600,000 percutaneous injuries 
annually involving contaminated sharps. In

[[Page 11542]]

response to both the continued concern over such exposures and the 
technological developments which can increase employee protection, 
Congress passed the Needle-stick Safety and Prevention Act directing 
OSHA to revise the blood borne pathogens (BBP) standard to establish 
requirements that employers identify and make use of effective and 
safer medical devices. That revision was published on January 18, 2001, 
and became effective April 18, 2001.
    The revision to OSHA's blood-borne pathogens standard added new 
requirements for employers, including additions to the exposure control 
plan and maintenance of a sharps injury log.
    OSHA has determined that compliance with these standards 
significantly reduces the risk that workers will contract a blood-borne 
disease in the course of their work. However, blood-borne pathogens 
programs, policies, and standards for health care workers are based 
primarily on hospital data. Approximately one-half of the 11 million 
health care workers in the United States are employed in non-hospital-
based settings, such as physician offices, home healthcare agencies, 
correctional facilities, or dental offices and clinics. Little 
information is known about the risk management practices in these non-
hospital settings. A small study conducted by the National Institute 
for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found that although seven of 
the eight correctional health care facilities visited had written 
exposure control plans, only two were reviewed and updated annually as 
required by the OSHA BBP Standard. One reason postulated for non-
compliance was that hospital-based standards, policies, and programs 
may not be appropriate to non-hospital settings. It is important to 
identify effective methods for using exposure control plans in non-
hospital settings and to verify whether the specificity and relevance 
of bloodborne pathogen training and educational materials for non-
hospital facilities can positively impact compliance in dental 
settings.
    The purposes of this proposal are to insure that bloodborne 
pathogens exposure control plans are effectively implemented in private 
dental offices and dental clinics, an important segment of the non-
hospital based healthcare system; and to understand how effective 
implementation strategies may be applied to other healthcare settings. 
The proposed work will draw on research-to-practice principles and will 
be assisted by a strong network of dental professional groups, trade 
associations, and government agencies. Specific objectives are to:
    (1) inventory existing exposure control plans in dental healthcare 
settings.
    (2) determine if the exposure control plan or other resource is 
actively used to prevent occupational exposures.
    (3) determine available resources and barriers to use such as 
relevant educational materials, knowledge, costs, availability, etc.
    (4) develop strategies to overcome key barriers to compliance.
    (5) report lessons learned applicable to the entire health sector.
    The Organization for Safety, Asepsis and Prevention (OSAP) is a 
unique group of dental educators and consultants, researchers, 
clinicians, industry representatives, and other interested persons with 
a collective mission to be the world's leading advocate for the safe 
and infection-free delivery of oral care. OSAP supports this commitment 
to dental workers and the public through quality education and 
information dissemination. OSAP's unique membership includes the 
variety of partners critical to gather the data on compliance with the 
OSHA bloodborne pathogens standard, identify barriers and develop 
strategies to overcome barriers to compliance.
    OSAP will be conducting a Web survey of private dental practices in 
the United States. Information collected will include current level of 
existing exposure control plans in various dental healthcare settings; 
whether the plan or other resource is actively used to prevent 
occupation exposures; available resources and barriers to use such as 
relevant education materials, knowledge, costs, and availability. OSAP 
is working with a publishing partner that has a double-opt-in email 
distribution list of 45,419 dentists. The dentists in the email list 
represent every state in the country. The list represents 32% of the 
total population of working dentists in the United States.
    The average open rate for this list is 12.76%, which would 
represent 5,768 dentists. The targeted number of completed 
questionnaires is estimated at about 566 (10% participation rate is 
assumed since there will be an incentive and one reminder). The survey 
is estimated to take about 10 minutes for respondents to complete.
    There are no costs to the respondents other than their time.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                      Average
                                                     Number of       Number of      burden per     Total burden
      Type of respondents           Form name       respondents    responses per   response  (in     (in hrs)
                                                                    respondent         hrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Private Dental Practices......  BBP Exposure                 566               1           10/60              94
                                 Control Plan
                                 Survey.
                                                                                 -------------------------------
    Total.....................  ................  ..............  ..............  ..............              94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Kimberly S. Lane,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-4557 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.