Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 11541-11543 [2012-4557]
Download as PDF
11541
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Form name
Student Program Participant ................
Student Outcome Survey Baseline Attachment
D.
Student Outcome Survey Mid-Term Attachment
F.
Student Outcome Survey Follow-up Attachment
E.
School Indicators Attachment G: ........................
Parent Outcome Baseline Survey Attachment H
Parent Outcome Follow-up Survey Attachment
EEEE.
Educator Outcome Survey Attachment I ............
Brand Ambassador Implementation Survey Attachment J.
School Leadership Capacity and Readiness
Survey Attachment K.
Parent Program Fidelity 6th Grade Session 1–
Session 6 Attachment L–Q.
Parent Program Fidelity 7th Grade Session 1,
3, 5 Attachment R–T.
Student Program Fidelity 6th Grade Session 1–
Session 6 Attachment U–Z.
Student Program Fidelity 7th Grade Session 1–
Session 7 Attachment AA–GG.
Student Program Fidelity 8th Grade Session 1–
Session 10 (comprehensive) Attachment HH–
QQ.
Communications Campaign Tracking Attachment RR.
Local Health Department Capacity and Readiness Attachment SS.
Student participant focus group guide (time
spent in focus group) Attachment ZZ.
Student curricula implementer focus group
guide (time spent in focus group) Attachment
AAA.
Parent curricula implementer focus group guide
(time spent in focus group) Attachment BBB.
Safe Dates 8th Grade Session 1–Session 10
(standard) Attachment CCC–LLL.
Student program master trainer TA form Attachment DDDD.
Student Program Participant ................
Student Program Participant ................
School data extractor ...........................
Parent Program Participant ..................
Parent Program Participant ..................
Educator ...............................................
Student Brand ambassador ..................
School leadership .................................
Parent Curricula Implementer ..............
Parent Curricula Implementer ..............
Student Curricula Implementer .............
Student Curricula Implementer .............
Student Curricula Implementer .............
Communications Coordinator ...............
Local Health Department Representative.
Student Program Participant ................
Student Curricula Implementer .............
Parent Curricula Implementer ..............
Student Curricula Implementer .............
Student Master Trainer .........................
Dated: February 21, 2012.
Kimberly S. Lane,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012–4561 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[60Day-12–12EV]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Feb 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–7570 and
send comments to Kimberly S. Lane,
CDC Reports Clearance Officer, 1600
Clifton Road MS–D74, Atlanta, GA
30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Type of respondent
Sfmt 4703
Average
burden per
response
(hours)
15,048
1
45/60
14,652
1
45/60
14,256
1
45/60
44
2,424
2,181
342
1
1
15/60
1
1
1,584
80
2
2
30/60
20/60
22
1
1
264
3
15/60
132
3
15/60
924
1
15/60
1078
1
15/60
1540
1
15/60
4
4
20/60
16
1
2
80
1
1.5
80
1
1
80
1
1
1540
1
15/60
12
50
10/60
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Ensuring compliance with the OSHA
Bloodborne Pathogens Standard among
Non-Hospital Healthcare Facilities—
New—National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention estimate that healthcare
workers sustain nearly 600,000
percutaneous injuries annually
involving contaminated sharps. In
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
11542
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices
response to both the continued concern
over such exposures and the
technological developments which can
increase employee protection, Congress
passed the Needle-stick Safety and
Prevention Act directing OSHA to revise
the blood borne pathogens (BBP)
standard to establish requirements that
employers identify and make use of
effective and safer medical devices. That
revision was published on January 18,
2001, and became effective April 18,
2001.
The revision to OSHA’s blood-borne
pathogens standard added new
requirements for employers, including
additions to the exposure control plan
and maintenance of a sharps injury log.
OSHA has determined that
compliance with these standards
significantly reduces the risk that
workers will contract a blood-borne
disease in the course of their work.
However, blood-borne pathogens
programs, policies, and standards for
health care workers are based primarily
on hospital data. Approximately onehalf of the 11 million health care
workers in the United States are
employed in non-hospital-based
settings, such as physician offices, home
healthcare agencies, correctional
facilities, or dental offices and clinics.
Little information is known about the
risk management practices in these nonhospital settings. A small study
conducted by the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) found that although seven of
the eight correctional health care
facilities visited had written exposure
control plans, only two were reviewed
and updated annually as required by the
OSHA BBP Standard. One reason
consultants, researchers, clinicians,
industry representatives, and other
interested persons with a collective
mission to be the world’s leading
advocate for the safe and infection-free
delivery of oral care. OSAP supports
this commitment to dental workers and
the public through quality education
and information dissemination. OSAP’s
unique membership includes the variety
of partners critical to gather the data on
compliance with the OSHA bloodborne
pathogens standard, identify barriers
and develop strategies to overcome
barriers to compliance.
OSAP will be conducting a Web
survey of private dental practices in the
United States. Information collected
will include current level of existing
exposure control plans in various dental
healthcare settings; whether the plan or
other resource is actively used to
prevent occupation exposures; available
resources and barriers to use such as
relevant education materials,
knowledge, costs, and availability.
OSAP is working with a publishing
partner that has a double-opt-in email
distribution list of 45,419 dentists. The
dentists in the email list represent every
state in the country. The list represents
32% of the total population of working
dentists in the United States.
The average open rate for this list is
12.76%, which would represent 5,768
dentists. The targeted number of
completed questionnaires is estimated
at about 566 (10% participation rate is
assumed since there will be an incentive
and one reminder). The survey is
estimated to take about 10 minutes for
respondents to complete.
There are no costs to the respondents
other than their time.
postulated for non-compliance was that
hospital-based standards, policies, and
programs may not be appropriate to
non-hospital settings. It is important to
identify effective methods for using
exposure control plans in non-hospital
settings and to verify whether the
specificity and relevance of bloodborne
pathogen training and educational
materials for non-hospital facilities can
positively impact compliance in dental
settings.
The purposes of this proposal are to
insure that bloodborne pathogens
exposure control plans are effectively
implemented in private dental offices
and dental clinics, an important
segment of the non-hospital based
healthcare system; and to understand
how effective implementation strategies
may be applied to other healthcare
settings. The proposed work will draw
on research-to-practice principles and
will be assisted by a strong network of
dental professional groups, trade
associations, and government agencies.
Specific objectives are to:
(1) inventory existing exposure
control plans in dental healthcare
settings.
(2) determine if the exposure control
plan or other resource is actively used
to prevent occupational exposures.
(3) determine available resources and
barriers to use such as relevant
educational materials, knowledge, costs,
availability, etc.
(4) develop strategies to overcome key
barriers to compliance.
(5) report lessons learned applicable
to the entire health sector.
The Organization for Safety, Asepsis
and Prevention (OSAP) is a unique
group of dental educators and
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Form name
Private Dental Practices ...................
BBP Exposure Control Plan Survey
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
Number of
responses
per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs)
566
1
10/60
94
........................
........................
........................
94
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Kimberly S. Lane,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012–4557 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:27 Feb 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Total burden
(in hrs)
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
11543
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices
preventable causes of mortality,
morbidity, and social problems among
both youth and young adults in the
United States. Data on health risk
behaviors of adolescents are the focus of
approximately 65 national health
objectives in Healthy People 2020, an
initiative of the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS). The
YRBS provides data to measure 20 of
the health objectives and 1 of the
Leading Health Indicators established
by Healthy People 2020. In addition, the
YRBS can identify racial and ethnic
disparities in health risk behaviors. No
other national source of data measures
as many of the Healthy People 2020
objectives addressing adolescent health
risk behaviors as the YRBS. The data
also will have significant implications
for policy and program development for
school health programs nationwide.
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–12–0493]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–7570 and
send comments to Kimberly Lane, CDC
Reports Clearance Officer, 1600 Clifton
Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
Proposed Project
2013 and 2015 National Youth Risk
Behavior Surveys (YRBS)(OMB No.
0920–0493)—Reinstatement with
change—National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The purpose of this request is to
obtain OMB approval to reinstate with
change, the data collection for the
National Youth Risk Behavior Survey
(YRBS), a school-based survey that has
been conducted biennially since 1991.
OMB approval for the 2009 YRBS and
2011 YRBS expired November 30, 2011
(OMB no. 0920–0493). CDC seeks a
three-year approval to conduct the
YRBS in Spring 2013 and Spring 2015.
Minor changes incorporated into this
reinstatement request include: An
updated title for the information
collection to accurately reflect the years
in which the survey will be conducted
and minor changes to the data collection
instrument.
The YRBS assesses priority health risk
behaviors related to the major
In Spring 2013 and Spring 2015, the
YRBS will be conducted among
nationally representative samples of
students attending public and private
schools in grades 9–12. Information
supporting the YRBS also will be
collected from state-, district-, and
school-level administrators and
teachers. The table below reports the
number of respondents annualized over
the 3-year project period.
There are no costs to respondents
except their time. The total estimated
annualized burden hours are 6,215.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Type of respondent
Form name
State Administrators ..........................
Students ............................................
State-level Recruitment Script for
the Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
District-level Recruitment Script for
the Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
School-level Recruitment Script for
the Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
Data Collection Checklist for the
Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey ............
Total Burden ..............................
...........................................................
District Administrators .......................
School Administrators .......................
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Teachers ...........................................
Number of
responses per
respondent
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
30 60
⁄
40
⁄
67
⁄
100
45 60
⁄
6,000
........................
6,215
30 60
80
1
133
1
30 60
400
1
15 60
8,000
1
........................
........................
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
19:27 Feb 24, 2012
8
1
[FR Doc. 2012–4553 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am]
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Total burden
(in hours)
⁄
17
Kimberly Lane,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11541-11543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4557]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[60Day-12-12EV]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects.
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-7570
and send comments to Kimberly S. Lane, CDC Reports Clearance Officer,
1600 Clifton Road MS-D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to
omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Ensuring compliance with the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard
among Non-Hospital Healthcare Facilities--New--National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that
healthcare workers sustain nearly 600,000 percutaneous injuries
annually involving contaminated sharps. In
[[Page 11542]]
response to both the continued concern over such exposures and the
technological developments which can increase employee protection,
Congress passed the Needle-stick Safety and Prevention Act directing
OSHA to revise the blood borne pathogens (BBP) standard to establish
requirements that employers identify and make use of effective and
safer medical devices. That revision was published on January 18, 2001,
and became effective April 18, 2001.
The revision to OSHA's blood-borne pathogens standard added new
requirements for employers, including additions to the exposure control
plan and maintenance of a sharps injury log.
OSHA has determined that compliance with these standards
significantly reduces the risk that workers will contract a blood-borne
disease in the course of their work. However, blood-borne pathogens
programs, policies, and standards for health care workers are based
primarily on hospital data. Approximately one-half of the 11 million
health care workers in the United States are employed in non-hospital-
based settings, such as physician offices, home healthcare agencies,
correctional facilities, or dental offices and clinics. Little
information is known about the risk management practices in these non-
hospital settings. A small study conducted by the National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found that although seven of
the eight correctional health care facilities visited had written
exposure control plans, only two were reviewed and updated annually as
required by the OSHA BBP Standard. One reason postulated for non-
compliance was that hospital-based standards, policies, and programs
may not be appropriate to non-hospital settings. It is important to
identify effective methods for using exposure control plans in non-
hospital settings and to verify whether the specificity and relevance
of bloodborne pathogen training and educational materials for non-
hospital facilities can positively impact compliance in dental
settings.
The purposes of this proposal are to insure that bloodborne
pathogens exposure control plans are effectively implemented in private
dental offices and dental clinics, an important segment of the non-
hospital based healthcare system; and to understand how effective
implementation strategies may be applied to other healthcare settings.
The proposed work will draw on research-to-practice principles and will
be assisted by a strong network of dental professional groups, trade
associations, and government agencies. Specific objectives are to:
(1) inventory existing exposure control plans in dental healthcare
settings.
(2) determine if the exposure control plan or other resource is
actively used to prevent occupational exposures.
(3) determine available resources and barriers to use such as
relevant educational materials, knowledge, costs, availability, etc.
(4) develop strategies to overcome key barriers to compliance.
(5) report lessons learned applicable to the entire health sector.
The Organization for Safety, Asepsis and Prevention (OSAP) is a
unique group of dental educators and consultants, researchers,
clinicians, industry representatives, and other interested persons with
a collective mission to be the world's leading advocate for the safe
and infection-free delivery of oral care. OSAP supports this commitment
to dental workers and the public through quality education and
information dissemination. OSAP's unique membership includes the
variety of partners critical to gather the data on compliance with the
OSHA bloodborne pathogens standard, identify barriers and develop
strategies to overcome barriers to compliance.
OSAP will be conducting a Web survey of private dental practices in
the United States. Information collected will include current level of
existing exposure control plans in various dental healthcare settings;
whether the plan or other resource is actively used to prevent
occupation exposures; available resources and barriers to use such as
relevant education materials, knowledge, costs, and availability. OSAP
is working with a publishing partner that has a double-opt-in email
distribution list of 45,419 dentists. The dentists in the email list
represent every state in the country. The list represents 32% of the
total population of working dentists in the United States.
The average open rate for this list is 12.76%, which would
represent 5,768 dentists. The targeted number of completed
questionnaires is estimated at about 566 (10% participation rate is
assumed since there will be an incentive and one reminder). The survey
is estimated to take about 10 minutes for respondents to complete.
There are no costs to the respondents other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number of burden per Total burden
Type of respondents Form name respondents responses per response (in (in hrs)
respondent hrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Private Dental Practices...... BBP Exposure 566 1 10/60 94
Control Plan
Survey.
-------------------------------
Total..................... ................ .............. .............. .............. 94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kimberly S. Lane,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-4557 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P