Findings of Research Misconduct, 11538-11539 [2012-4366]
Download as PDF
11538
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices
Dated: February 15, 2012.
John R. Bucher,
Associate Director, National Toxicology
Program.
[FR Doc. 2012–4541 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Findings of Research Misconduct
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is hereby given that
the Office of Research Integrity (ORI)
has taken final action in the following
case:
Michael W. Miller, Ph.D., State
University of New York, Upstate
Medical University: Based on the report
of an investigation conducted by the
State University of New York, Upstate
Medical University (SUNY UMU) and
additional analysis conducted by ORI in
its oversight review, ORI found that Dr.
Michael W. Miller, former Professor and
Chair, Department of Neuroscience and
Physiology, SUNY UMU, engaged in
research misconduct in research
supported by National Institute of
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
(NIAAA), National Institutes of Health
(NIH), grants R01 AA07568–18A1, R01
AA06916, and P50 AA017823–01.
ORI finds that the Respondent
engaged in research misconduct by
falsifying and/or fabricating data that
were included in grant applications R01
AA07568–18, R01 AA07568–18A1, R01
AA006916–25, and P50 AA017823–01
and in the following:
• Miller, M.W., Hu, H. ‘‘Lability of
neuronal lineage decisions is revealed
by acute exposures to ethanol.’’ Dev.
Neurosci. 31(1–2):50–7, 2009 (‘‘Dev.
Neurosci. 2009’’)
• Bruns, M.B., Miller, M.W.
‘‘Functional nerve growth factor and
trkA autocrine/paracrine circuits in
adult rat cortex are revealed by episodic
ethanol exposure and withdrawal.’’ J.
Neurochem. 100(5):1115–68, 2007 (‘‘J.
Neurochem. 2007’’)
• A prepared manuscript submitted
to PNAS for publication.
As a result of its investigation, SUNY
UMU recommended that Dev. Neurosci.
2009 and J. Neurochem. 2007 be
retracted. Both publications have now
been retracted:
• Dev. Neurosci. 2009 was retracted
online on January 19, 2012, at: https://
content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/
produkte.asp?Aktion=
ShowPDF&ArtikelNr=
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Feb 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
323471&Ausgabe=0&ProduktNr=
224107&filename=323471.pdf.
• J. Neurochem. 2007 was retracted
online on January 23, 2012, at: https://
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/
j.1471-4159.2012.07662.x/full.
Specifically, ORI finds that the
Respondent:
• Falsified Figure 5 in NIH grant
application R01 AA07568–18A1 by
altering the bar graphs to make the
experimental results appear valid and
consistent with his hypothesis that
ethanol exposure in-utero alters the
transition of cells from Pax 6 expression
to Tbr2 expression, which is critical to
normal brain development. Specifically:
a. In the VZ/SZ panel (upper row,
right), Dr. Miller decreased the values
by 50% for the bar graphs representing
control and treated mice for ‘‘Tbr2,’’
‘‘both,’’ and ‘‘both/Ki-67,’’ to falsely
report an equivalent frequency of Tbr2
expressing cells in the right and left
panels; this result was required for the
experiment to appear valid;
b. In the MGE panel (lower row,
right), Dr. Miller altered the bar graphs
representing control and treated mice
for ‘‘Ki-67,’’ ‘‘Pax6,’’ and ‘‘both’’ to
falsely report that ethanol increased the
frequency of K–67+ cells and to report
an equivalent frequency of Pax
expressing cells in the right and left
panels.
• Fabricated bar graphs in
Supplemental Figure 2 in a manuscript
submitted to PNAS and text in the
manuscript also appearing in the grant
application AA00616–25 to support the
hypothesis that ethanol exposure during
postnatal weeks 1 and 2 causes specific
neuronal cell death in layers II/III and
V of the cortex. Specifically, Dr. Miller:
a. Fabricated bar graphs in
Supplemental Figure 2 and related text
in the PNAS manuscript to show that in
select layers of the cortex, ethanol
induced neuronal death occurred in
post-natal day 10 (P10) mice;
b. Included fabricated text in the
PNAS manuscript and the grant
application citing results of experiments
using 15–25-day-old mice treated with
ethanol during the second postnatal
week, when these mice were never
generated.
• Falsified Figure 6 in a manuscript
submitted to PNAS by altering data
points for the labeling index of caspase3
and TUNEL in cortex layers II/III and V
after exposure to ethanol in postnatal
day 7 (P7) mice, such that the two
assays confirmed each other. The same
data were also included as Figure 4 in
NIH grant application R01 AA06916 and
as Figure 7 in a poster presentation at
the 2009 Research Society on
Alcoholism.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Falsified the figure legends and/or
text in a published paper and multiple
grant applications to support the
primary hypothesis of the published
paper that gestational alcohol exposure
had an effect on brain development by
affecting the way neurons differentiate
and migrate into the cortex, rather than
by changes to cell growth or death.
Specifically, Dr. Miller falsely reported
the number of animals (n) that were
used in figure legends and/or text in the
following:
Æ Figures 2 and 5, Dev. Neurosci.
2009, also included as Figures 3 and 4,
respectively, in R01 AA07568–18;
Æ Figure 4 and Table 2 in P50
AA017823–01.
• Falsified Figures 4 and 6 in J.
Neurochem. 2007 by altering bar graphs
to increase the significance of the effect
of ethanol exposure and/or withdrawal
on NGF or trkA protein expression,
thereby conforming with the paper’s
hypothesis that ethanol exposure and
withdrawal affect the normal NGF/trkA
circuits in cortical layer V. Specifically,
Dr. Miller:
a. Increased the value of the ethanol
treated NGF expression in Figure 4 and
decreased the value of withdrawal NFG
to alter the difference between the two
from approximately 2.2% to 11.6%,
thereby falsely reporting significance
where there was none;
b. In Figure 6:
(a) Increased the value of withdrawal
trkA data by approximately 70% to
falsely report significance with relation
to the ethanol treated value and increase
significance with relation to the control;
(b) Increased the value of the ethanol
treated phospho-trkA data by
approximately 100% to increase the
significance with relation to the control;
(c) Falsely reported the results for
Figure 6 as showing a nearly doubled
ratio of p-trkA to total trkA after ethanol
exposure when there was no increase at
all.
Dr. Miller has entered into a
Voluntary Exclusion Agreement
(Agreement). Dr. Miller neither admits
nor denies committing research
misconduct but accepts ORI has found
evidence of research misconduct as set
forth above.
Dr. Miller has voluntarily agreed:
(1) To exclude himself voluntarily
from any contracting or subcontracting
with any agency of the United States
Government and from eligibility or
involvement in nonprocurement
programs of the United States
Government referred to as ‘‘covered
transactions’’ pursuant to HHS’
Implementation (2 CFR part 376 et seq)
of OMB Guidelines to Agencies on
Governmentwide Debarment and
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2012 / Notices
Suspension, 2 CFR part 180 (collectively
the ‘‘Debarment Regulations’’) for a
period of one (1) year, beginning on
February 6, 2012;
(2) To have his research supervised
for a period of two (2) years
immediately following the one (1) year
period of exclusion; Respondent agrees
that prior to the submission of an
application for U.S. Public Health
Service (PHS) support for a research
project on which the Respondent’s
participation is proposed and prior to
the Respondent’s participation in any
capacity on PHS-supported research,
Respondent shall ensure that a plan for
supervision of Respondent’s duties is
submitted to ORI for approval; the
supervision plan must be designed to
ensure the scientific integrity of
Respondent’s research contribution as
outlined below; Respondent agrees that
he shall not participate in any PHSsupported research until such a
supervision plan is submitted to and
approved by ORI; Respondent agrees to
maintain responsibility for compliance
with the agreed upon supervision plan;
the requirements for Respondent’s
supervision plan are as follows:
i. A committee of 2–3 senior faculty
members at the institution who are
familiar with Respondent’s field of
research, but not including
Respondent’s supervisor or
collaborators, will provide oversight and
guidance for two (2) years immediately
following the period of exclusion; the
committee will review primary data
from Respondent’s laboratory on a
quarterly basis and submit a report to
ORI at six (6) month intervals setting
forth the committee meeting dates,
Respondent’s compliance with
appropriate research standards, and
confirming the integrity of Respondent’s
research; and
ii. The committee will conduct an
advance review of any PHS grant
applications (including supplements,
resubmissions, etc.), manuscripts
reporting PHS-funded research
submitted for publication, and abstracts;
the review will include a discussion
with Respondent of the primary data
represented in those documents and
include a certification to ORI that the
data presented in the proposed
application/publication is supported by
the research record;
(3) That any institution employing
him during the two (2) years during
which the supervisory plan is in effect
shall submit, in conjunction with each
application for PHS funds, or report,
manuscript, or abstract involving PHSsupported research in which
Respondent is involved, a certification
to ORI that the data provided by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Feb 24, 2012
Jkt 226001
Respondent are based on actual
experiments or are otherwise
legitimately derived and that the data,
procedures, and methodology are
accurately reported in the application,
report, manuscript, or abstract; and
(4) To exclude himself from serving in
any advisory capacity to PHS including,
but not limited to, service on any PHS
advisory committee, board, and/or peer
review committee, or as a consultant for
a period of three (3) years, beginning on
February 6, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Division of Investigative
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity,
1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750,
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453–8800.
John Dahlberg,
Director, Division of Investigative Oversight,
Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. 2012–4366 Filed 2–24–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–12–11JD]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–7570 or send an
email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806.
Written comments should be received
within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Evaluation of Dating Matters:
Strategies to Promote Healthy Teen
RelationshipsTM—New—National
Center for Injury Prevention and
Control—Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
Background and Brief Description
Dating Matters: Strategies to Promote
Healthy Teen RelationshipsTM is the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention’s new teen dating violence
prevention initiative.
Recently, efforts to prevent teen
dating violence (TDV) have grown,
particularly in schools, among
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11539
policymakers, and among sexual
violence and domestic violence
coalitions. Now many states and
communities also are working to stop
teen dating violence. However, these
activities vary greatly in quality and
effectiveness. To address the gaps, CDC
has developed Dating Matters, a teen
dating violence prevention program that
includes programming for students,
parents, educators, as well as policy
development. Dating Matters is based on
the current evidence about what works
in prevention and focuses on high-risk,
urban communities where participants
include: Middle school students age 11
to 14 years; middle school parents;
brand ambassadors; educators; school
leadership; program implementers;
community representatives; and local
health department representatives in the
following communities: Alameda
County, California; Baltimore,
Maryland; Broward County, Florida;
and Chicago, Illinois.
The primary goal of the current
proposal is to conduct an outcome and
implementation evaluation of Dating
Matters in the four metropolitan cities to
determine its feasibility, cost, and
effectiveness. In the evaluation a
standard model of TDV prevention (Safe
Dates administered in 8th grade) will be
compared to a comprehensive model
(programs administered in 6th, 7th, and
8th grade as well as parent, educator,
policy, and communications
interventions).
Burden estimates are based on the
following information:
• Number of communities/sites: 4
• Number of schools across 4
communities/sites: 44 (12 in 3
communities, 8 in 1 community)
• Number of students in each middle
school: 600 (200 per grade)
• Number of school staff in each
school: 40
• Number of schools implementing
the standard model of TDV prevention:
22 (across 4 sites/communities)
• Number of schools implementing
the comprehensive model of TDV
prevention: 22 (across 4 sites/
communities)
Population. The study population
includes students in 6th, 7th and 8th
grades at 44 schools in the four
participating sites. At most, schools are
expected to have 6 classrooms per
grade, with an average of 30 students
per classroom yielding a population of
23,760 students (44 schools * 3 grades
* 6 classrooms per grade * 30 students
per classroom).
The sampling frame for parents, given
that we would only include one parent
per student, is also 23,760 for the three
years of data collection covered by this
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11538-11539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4366]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Findings of Research Misconduct
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity
(ORI) has taken final action in the following case:
Michael W. Miller, Ph.D., State University of New York, Upstate
Medical University: Based on the report of an investigation conducted
by the State University of New York, Upstate Medical University (SUNY
UMU) and additional analysis conducted by ORI in its oversight review,
ORI found that Dr. Michael W. Miller, former Professor and Chair,
Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, SUNY UMU, engaged in
research misconduct in research supported by National Institute of
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institutes of Health
(NIH), grants R01 AA07568-18A1, R01 AA06916, and P50 AA017823-01.
ORI finds that the Respondent engaged in research misconduct by
falsifying and/or fabricating data that were included in grant
applications R01 AA07568-18, R01 AA07568-18A1, R01 AA006916-25, and P50
AA017823-01 and in the following:
Miller, M.W., Hu, H. ``Lability of neuronal lineage
decisions is revealed by acute exposures to ethanol.'' Dev. Neurosci.
31(1-2):50-7, 2009 (``Dev. Neurosci. 2009'')
Bruns, M.B., Miller, M.W. ``Functional nerve growth factor
and trkA autocrine/paracrine circuits in adult rat cortex are revealed
by episodic ethanol exposure and withdrawal.'' J. Neurochem.
100(5):1115-68, 2007 (``J. Neurochem. 2007'')
A prepared manuscript submitted to PNAS for publication.
As a result of its investigation, SUNY UMU recommended that Dev.
Neurosci. 2009 and J. Neurochem. 2007 be retracted. Both publications
have now been retracted:
Dev. Neurosci. 2009 was retracted online on January 19,
2012, at: https://content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Aktion=ShowPDF&ArtikelNr=323471&Ausgabe=0&ProduktNr=224107&filename=323471.pdf.
J. Neurochem. 2007 was retracted online on January 23,
2012, at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07662.x/full.
Specifically, ORI finds that the Respondent:
Falsified Figure 5 in NIH grant application R01 AA07568-
18A1 by altering the bar graphs to make the experimental results appear
valid and consistent with his hypothesis that ethanol exposure in-utero
alters the transition of cells from Pax 6 expression to Tbr2
expression, which is critical to normal brain development.
Specifically:
a. In the VZ/SZ panel (upper row, right), Dr. Miller decreased the
values by 50% for the bar graphs representing control and treated mice
for ``Tbr2,'' ``both,'' and ``both/Ki-67,'' to falsely report an
equivalent frequency of Tbr2 expressing cells in the right and left
panels; this result was required for the experiment to appear valid;
b. In the MGE panel (lower row, right), Dr. Miller altered the bar
graphs representing control and treated mice for ``Ki-67,'' ``Pax6,''
and ``both'' to falsely report that ethanol increased the frequency of
K-67+ cells and to report an equivalent frequency of Pax expressing
cells in the right and left panels.
Fabricated bar graphs in Supplemental Figure 2 in a
manuscript submitted to PNAS and text in the manuscript also appearing
in the grant application AA00616-25 to support the hypothesis that
ethanol exposure during postnatal weeks 1 and 2 causes specific
neuronal cell death in layers II/III and V of the cortex. Specifically,
Dr. Miller:
a. Fabricated bar graphs in Supplemental Figure 2 and related text
in the PNAS manuscript to show that in select layers of the cortex,
ethanol induced neuronal death occurred in post-natal day 10 (P10)
mice;
b. Included fabricated text in the PNAS manuscript and the grant
application citing results of experiments using 15-25-day-old mice
treated with ethanol during the second postnatal week, when these mice
were never generated.
Falsified Figure 6 in a manuscript submitted to PNAS by
altering data points for the labeling index of caspase3 and TUNEL in
cortex layers II/III and V after exposure to ethanol in postnatal day 7
(P7) mice, such that the two assays confirmed each other. The same data
were also included as Figure 4 in NIH grant application R01 AA06916 and
as Figure 7 in a poster presentation at the 2009 Research Society on
Alcoholism.
Falsified the figure legends and/or text in a published
paper and multiple grant applications to support the primary hypothesis
of the published paper that gestational alcohol exposure had an effect
on brain development by affecting the way neurons differentiate and
migrate into the cortex, rather than by changes to cell growth or
death. Specifically, Dr. Miller falsely reported the number of animals
(n) that were used in figure legends and/or text in the following:
[cir] Figures 2 and 5, Dev. Neurosci. 2009, also included as
Figures 3 and 4, respectively, in R01 AA07568-18;
[cir] Figure 4 and Table 2 in P50 AA017823-01.
Falsified Figures 4 and 6 in J. Neurochem. 2007 by
altering bar graphs to increase the significance of the effect of
ethanol exposure and/or withdrawal on NGF or trkA protein expression,
thereby conforming with the paper's hypothesis that ethanol exposure
and withdrawal affect the normal NGF/trkA circuits in cortical layer V.
Specifically, Dr. Miller:
a. Increased the value of the ethanol treated NGF expression in
Figure 4 and decreased the value of withdrawal NFG to alter the
difference between the two from approximately 2.2% to 11.6%, thereby
falsely reporting significance where there was none;
b. In Figure 6:
(a) Increased the value of withdrawal trkA data by approximately
70% to falsely report significance with relation to the ethanol treated
value and increase significance with relation to the control;
(b) Increased the value of the ethanol treated phospho-trkA data by
approximately 100% to increase the significance with relation to the
control;
(c) Falsely reported the results for Figure 6 as showing a nearly
doubled ratio of p-trkA to total trkA after ethanol exposure when there
was no increase at all.
Dr. Miller has entered into a Voluntary Exclusion Agreement
(Agreement). Dr. Miller neither admits nor denies committing research
misconduct but accepts ORI has found evidence of research misconduct as
set forth above.
Dr. Miller has voluntarily agreed:
(1) To exclude himself voluntarily from any contracting or
subcontracting with any agency of the United States Government and from
eligibility or involvement in nonprocurement programs of the United
States Government referred to as ``covered transactions'' pursuant to
HHS' Implementation (2 CFR part 376 et seq) of OMB Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and
[[Page 11539]]
Suspension, 2 CFR part 180 (collectively the ``Debarment Regulations'')
for a period of one (1) year, beginning on February 6, 2012;
(2) To have his research supervised for a period of two (2) years
immediately following the one (1) year period of exclusion; Respondent
agrees that prior to the submission of an application for U.S. Public
Health Service (PHS) support for a research project on which the
Respondent's participation is proposed and prior to the Respondent's
participation in any capacity on PHS-supported research, Respondent
shall ensure that a plan for supervision of Respondent's duties is
submitted to ORI for approval; the supervision plan must be designed to
ensure the scientific integrity of Respondent's research contribution
as outlined below; Respondent agrees that he shall not participate in
any PHS-supported research until such a supervision plan is submitted
to and approved by ORI; Respondent agrees to maintain responsibility
for compliance with the agreed upon supervision plan; the requirements
for Respondent's supervision plan are as follows:
i. A committee of 2-3 senior faculty members at the institution who
are familiar with Respondent's field of research, but not including
Respondent's supervisor or collaborators, will provide oversight and
guidance for two (2) years immediately following the period of
exclusion; the committee will review primary data from Respondent's
laboratory on a quarterly basis and submit a report to ORI at six (6)
month intervals setting forth the committee meeting dates, Respondent's
compliance with appropriate research standards, and confirming the
integrity of Respondent's research; and
ii. The committee will conduct an advance review of any PHS grant
applications (including supplements, resubmissions, etc.), manuscripts
reporting PHS-funded research submitted for publication, and abstracts;
the review will include a discussion with Respondent of the primary
data represented in those documents and include a certification to ORI
that the data presented in the proposed application/publication is
supported by the research record;
(3) That any institution employing him during the two (2) years
during which the supervisory plan is in effect shall submit, in
conjunction with each application for PHS funds, or report, manuscript,
or abstract involving PHS-supported research in which Respondent is
involved, a certification to ORI that the data provided by Respondent
are based on actual experiments or are otherwise legitimately derived
and that the data, procedures, and methodology are accurately reported
in the application, report, manuscript, or abstract; and
(4) To exclude himself from serving in any advisory capacity to PHS
including, but not limited to, service on any PHS advisory committee,
board, and/or peer review committee, or as a consultant for a period of
three (3) years, beginning on February 6, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Division of Investigative
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite
750, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453-8800.
John Dahlberg,
Director, Division of Investigative Oversight, Office of Research
Integrity.
[FR Doc. 2012-4366 Filed 2-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-31-P