Notice of Buy American Waiver Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, 11163-11164 [2012-4233]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 37 / Friday, February 24, 2012 / Notices
Dated: February 17, 2012.
Lawrence Rudolph,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012–4235 Filed 2–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Buy American Waiver Under
the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009
AGENCY:
National Science Foundation
(NSF).
ACTION:
Notice.
NSF is hereby granting a
limited exemption of section 1605 of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), Public Law
111–5, 123 Stat. 115, 303 (2009), with
respect to the purchase of the superior
holding power balanced anchors that
will be used in the Alaska Region
Research Vessel (ARRV). These anchors
are required in order to accommodate
the vessel’s ice breaking bow shape and
they will save weight.
DATES: February 24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd.,
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Jeffrey Leithead, Division of Acquisition
and Cooperative Support, 703–292–
4595.
SUMMARY:
In
accordance with section 1605(c) of the
Recovery Act and section 176.80 of Title
2 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the
National Science Foundation (NSF)
hereby provides notice that on February
15, 2012, the NSF Chief Financial
Officer, in accordance with a delegation
order from the Director of the agency,
granted a limited project exemption of
section 1605 of the Recovery Act (Buy
American provision) with respect to the
superior holding power balanced
anchors that will be used in the ARRV.
The basis for this exemption is section
1605(b)(2) of the Recovery Act, in that
superior holding power balanced
anchors of satisfactory quality are not
produced in the United States in
sufficient and reasonably available
commercial quantities. The total cost of
the three (3) required anchors
(∼$42,360) represents less than 0.1% of
the total $148 million Recovery Act
award provided for construction of the
ARRV.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Recovery Act appropriated $400
million to NSF for several projects being
funded by the Foundation’s Major
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Feb 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
Research Equipment and Facilities
Construction (MREFC) account. The
ARRV is one of NSF’s MREFC projects.
Section 1605(a) of the Recovery Act, the
Buy American provision, states that
none of the funds appropriated by the
Act ‘‘may be used for a project for the
construction, alteration, maintenance, or
repair of a public building or public
work unless all of the iron, steel, and
manufactured goods used in the project
are produced in the United States.’’
The ARRV has been developed under
a cooperative agreement awarded to the
University of Alaska, Fairbanks (UAF)
that began in 2007. UAF executed the
shipyard contract in December 2009 and
the project is currently under
construction. The purpose of the
Recovery Act is to stimulate economic
recovery in part by funding current
construction projects like the ARRV that
are ‘‘shovel ready’’ without requiring
projects to revise their standards and
specifications, or to restart the bidding
process again.
Subsections 1605(b) and (c) of the
Recovery Act authorize the head of a
Federal department or agency to waive
the Buy American provision if the head
of the agency finds that: (1) Applying
the provision would be inconsistent
with the public interest; (2) the relevant
goods are not produced in the United
States in sufficient and reasonably
available quantities and of a satisfactory
quality; or (3) the inclusion of the goods
produced in the United States will
increase the cost of the project by more
than 25 percent. If the head of the
Federal department or agency waives
the Buy American provision, then the
head of the department or agency is
required to publish a detailed
justification in the Federal Register.
Finally, section 1605(d) of the Recovery
Act states that the Buy American
provision must be applied in a manner
consistent with the United States’
obligations under international
agreements.
II. Finding That Relevant Goods Are
Not Produced in the United States in
Sufficient and Reasonably Available
Quality
The specification for the ARRV
originally called for standard
‘‘stockless’’ anchors (the stock is the
cross arm below the ring on an oldfashioned style anchor), which are in
common use on commercial and
military vessels. The design
requirements in the specification for the
anchoring system on the ARRV include:
1. Approved by the American Bureau
of Shipping with regard to operability,
quality and size/holding power (6,000
lbs).
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11163
2. The anchors drop immediately
upon release.
3. The anchors do not jam in the
hawse pipe (chain pipe between the
hull and deck).
4. The anchors do not move when
stowed in heavy seas.
5. The anchors ‘‘self-stow’’ against the
hull.
Failure to meet any of these technical
requirements would have severe
negative impacts on safety. Anchors are
required not only for routine use in port
or during operations, but in an
emergency situation (for example, the
loss of propulsion) to keep the vessel
from going aground, damaging the hull
and sinking. In this situation, the
anchors must release from the ship
quickly and efficiently. If proper
anchors are not used, the safety of the
vessel and the lives of everyone on
board would be jeopardized. The ARRV
is approved by the American Bureau of
Shipping (ABS) to ensure safe design,
construction, and vessel operation.
Since proper storage of the anchors in
the bow of the ship is often difficult to
achieve, the specification also called for
the shipyard to construct a physical
mock-up of the anchoring system,
which includes the anchors, anchor
pockets (recesses in the bow that keep
the anchors from protruding beyond the
hull), hawse pipes, and anchor winches.
Through this process, it was found that
the stockless anchor would not store
properly in the pockets that were
required to accommodate the ARRV’s
specialized ice-breaking bow. To protect
the anchors during ice operations, the
pockets were originally set as high in
the bow as possible. The only way to
make the stockless anchor work would
be to put the pockets excessively close
to the water line, but that would be
contrary to American Bureau of
Shipping and international regulatory
guidance for ice-classed vessels.
Through continued testing with the
mock-up, it was found that only a
‘‘balanced’’ anchor would work with the
pockets in the proper location. A
balanced anchor always stows with the
flukes (the ‘‘hooks’’ that penetrate into
the bottom) in the same position.
The specification originally called for
three (3) anchors; one on each side of
the bow and one spare on deck. This
configuration is typical for all
commercial and military vessels. As
part of the design effort to reduce
weight, the shipyard originally
proposed eliminating the spare anchor,
which was not considered prudent by
UAF. As an option, the use of three
smaller, lighter ‘‘superior’’ holding
power anchors was proposed during the
anchoring system evaluation. This
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11164
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 37 / Friday, February 24, 2012 / Notices
approach was considered the best
approach to enhance safety in the event
one (or both) fitted anchors are lost in
an emergency situation. Use of superior
holding power anchors was
subsequently approved by ABS as long
as the anchor was sufficiently tested,
proven, and held an ABS class
certificate. ABS allows up to a 25
percent reduction in weight (4,500 lbs
each) for a total weight savings of over
a ton.
The shipyard’s market research
included an ABS web based data search
for superior holding power anchors.
Approximately forty three (43)
companies world-wide were identified
that manufacture ABS approved anchors
of superior holding anchors. Of these,
only two (2) were U.S. manufacturers.
Neither company produced an anchor of
the correct size that will fit in the
ARRV’s anchor pocket. The pocket
cannot be made larger because of the
specialized hull shape of the icebreaking bow as described above.
The project’s conclusion is that there
are no U.S. manufacturers who produce
suitable superior holding power
balanced anchors that meet all of the
ARRV requirements, so an exemption
from the Buy American requirements is
necessary.
In the absence of a domestic supplier
that could provide requirementscompliant superior holding power
anchors, UAF requested that NSF issue
a Section 1605 exemption determination
with respect to the purchase of foreignsupplied, requirements-compliant
superior holding power balanced
anchors, so that the vessel will meet the
specific design and technical
requirements that, as explained above,
are necessary for this vessel to be able
to perform its mission successfully.
Furthermore, the shipyard’s market
research indicated that superior holding
power balanced anchors compliant with
the ARRV’s technical specifications and
requirements are commercially available
from foreign vendors within their
standard product lines.
NSF’s Division of Acquisition and
Cooperative Support (DACS) and other
NSF program staff reviewed the UAF
exemption request submittal, found that
it was complete, and determined that
sufficient technical information was
provided in order for NSF to evaluate
the exemption request and to conclude
that an exemption is needed and should
be granted.
III. Exemption
On February 15, 2012, based on the
finding that no domestically produced
superior holding power balanced
anchors met all of the ARRV’s technical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Feb 23, 2012
Jkt 226001
specifications and requirements and
pursuant to section 1605(b), the NSF
Chief Financial Officer, in accordance
with a delegation order from the
Director of the agency signed on May
27, 2010, granted a limited project
exemption of the Recovery Act’s Buy
American requirements with respect to
the procurement of superior holding
power balanced anchors.
Dated: February 16, 2012.
Lawrence Rudolph,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012–4233 Filed 2–22–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Proposal Review Meetings
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation (NSF) announces its intent
to hold proposal review meetings
throughout the year. The purpose of
these meetings is to provide advice and
recommendations concerning proposals
submitted to the NSF for financial
support. The agenda for each of these
meetings is to review and evaluate
proposals as part of the selection
process for awards. The review and
evaluation may also include assessment
of the progress of awarded proposals.
The majority of these meetings will take
place at NSF, 4201 Wilson, Blvd.,
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
These meetings will be closed to the
public. The proposals being reviewed
include information of a proprietary or
confidential nature, including technical
information; financial data, such as
salaries; and personal information
concerning individuals associated with
the proposals. These matters are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF
will continue to review the agenda and
merits of each meeting for overall
compliance of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act.
These closed proposal review
meetings will not be announced on an
individual basis in the Federal Register.
NSF intends to publish a notice similar
to this on a quarterly basis. For an
advance listing of the closed proposal
review meetings that include the names
of the proposal review panel and the
time, date, place, and any information
on changes, corrections, or
cancellations, please visit the NSF Web
site: https://www.nsf.gov. This
information may also be requested by
telephoning, 703/292–8182.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: February 21, 2012.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–4306 Filed 2–23–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. NRC–2012–0047]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Emergency Clearance
Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to
submit an information collection
request for emergency review to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and solicitation of public
comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) invites public
comment about our intention to request
emergency review and OMB approval of
the information collection that is
summarized below. We are required to
publish this notice in the Federal
Register under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35). In compliance with
the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A)
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
we have submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) the
following requirements for emergency
review. We are requesting an emergency
review because the collection of this
information is needed before the
expiration of the normal time limits
under OMB’s regulations at 5 CFR
1320.13. This is necessary to ensure
compliance with requirements in
Section 402 of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2012, ‘‘* * *’’ We
cannot reasonably comply with the
normal clearance procedures because
the use of normal clearance procedures
is reasonably likely to prevent or disrupt
the collection of information as stated in
5 CFR 1320.13(a)(2)(iii).
Information pertaining to the
requirement to be submitted:
1. Type of submission, new, revision,
or extension: New.
2. The title of the information
collection: Request for Information
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding
Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 and 93, of the
Near-Term Task Force Review of
Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Event.
2. Current OMB approval number: Not
applicable.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11163-11164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4233]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Buy American Waiver Under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009
AGENCY: National Science Foundation (NSF).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NSF is hereby granting a limited exemption of section 1605 of
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act),
Public Law 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, 303 (2009), with respect to the
purchase of the superior holding power balanced anchors that will be
used in the Alaska Region Research Vessel (ARRV). These anchors are
required in order to accommodate the vessel's ice breaking bow shape
and they will save weight.
DATES: February 24, 2012.
ADDRESSES: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington,
Virginia 22230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey Leithead, Division of
Acquisition and Cooperative Support, 703-292-4595.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 1605(c) of the
Recovery Act and section 176.80 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, the National Science Foundation (NSF) hereby provides
notice that on February 15, 2012, the NSF Chief Financial Officer, in
accordance with a delegation order from the Director of the agency,
granted a limited project exemption of section 1605 of the Recovery Act
(Buy American provision) with respect to the superior holding power
balanced anchors that will be used in the ARRV. The basis for this
exemption is section 1605(b)(2) of the Recovery Act, in that superior
holding power balanced anchors of satisfactory quality are not produced
in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available commercial
quantities. The total cost of the three (3) required anchors (~$42,360)
represents less than 0.1% of the total $148 million Recovery Act award
provided for construction of the ARRV.
I. Background
The Recovery Act appropriated $400 million to NSF for several
projects being funded by the Foundation's Major Research Equipment and
Facilities Construction (MREFC) account. The ARRV is one of NSF's MREFC
projects. Section 1605(a) of the Recovery Act, the Buy American
provision, states that none of the funds appropriated by the Act ``may
be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or
repair of a public building or public work unless all of the iron,
steel, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the
United States.''
The ARRV has been developed under a cooperative agreement awarded
to the University of Alaska, Fairbanks (UAF) that began in 2007. UAF
executed the shipyard contract in December 2009 and the project is
currently under construction. The purpose of the Recovery Act is to
stimulate economic recovery in part by funding current construction
projects like the ARRV that are ``shovel ready'' without requiring
projects to revise their standards and specifications, or to restart
the bidding process again.
Subsections 1605(b) and (c) of the Recovery Act authorize the head
of a Federal department or agency to waive the Buy American provision
if the head of the agency finds that: (1) Applying the provision would
be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) the relevant goods are
not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably
available quantities and of a satisfactory quality; or (3) the
inclusion of the goods produced in the United States will increase the
cost of the project by more than 25 percent. If the head of the Federal
department or agency waives the Buy American provision, then the head
of the department or agency is required to publish a detailed
justification in the Federal Register. Finally, section 1605(d) of the
Recovery Act states that the Buy American provision must be applied in
a manner consistent with the United States' obligations under
international agreements.
II. Finding That Relevant Goods Are Not Produced in the United States
in Sufficient and Reasonably Available Quality
The specification for the ARRV originally called for standard
``stockless'' anchors (the stock is the cross arm below the ring on an
old-fashioned style anchor), which are in common use on commercial and
military vessels. The design requirements in the specification for the
anchoring system on the ARRV include:
1. Approved by the American Bureau of Shipping with regard to
operability, quality and size/holding power (6,000 lbs).
2. The anchors drop immediately upon release.
3. The anchors do not jam in the hawse pipe (chain pipe between the
hull and deck).
4. The anchors do not move when stowed in heavy seas.
5. The anchors ``self-stow'' against the hull.
Failure to meet any of these technical requirements would have
severe negative impacts on safety. Anchors are required not only for
routine use in port or during operations, but in an emergency situation
(for example, the loss of propulsion) to keep the vessel from going
aground, damaging the hull and sinking. In this situation, the anchors
must release from the ship quickly and efficiently. If proper anchors
are not used, the safety of the vessel and the lives of everyone on
board would be jeopardized. The ARRV is approved by the American Bureau
of Shipping (ABS) to ensure safe design, construction, and vessel
operation.
Since proper storage of the anchors in the bow of the ship is often
difficult to achieve, the specification also called for the shipyard to
construct a physical mock-up of the anchoring system, which includes
the anchors, anchor pockets (recesses in the bow that keep the anchors
from protruding beyond the hull), hawse pipes, and anchor winches.
Through this process, it was found that the stockless anchor would not
store properly in the pockets that were required to accommodate the
ARRV's specialized ice-breaking bow. To protect the anchors during ice
operations, the pockets were originally set as high in the bow as
possible. The only way to make the stockless anchor work would be to
put the pockets excessively close to the water line, but that would be
contrary to American Bureau of Shipping and international regulatory
guidance for ice-classed vessels. Through continued testing with the
mock-up, it was found that only a ``balanced'' anchor would work with
the pockets in the proper location. A balanced anchor always stows with
the flukes (the ``hooks'' that penetrate into the bottom) in the same
position.
The specification originally called for three (3) anchors; one on
each side of the bow and one spare on deck. This configuration is
typical for all commercial and military vessels. As part of the design
effort to reduce weight, the shipyard originally proposed eliminating
the spare anchor, which was not considered prudent by UAF. As an
option, the use of three smaller, lighter ``superior'' holding power
anchors was proposed during the anchoring system evaluation. This
[[Page 11164]]
approach was considered the best approach to enhance safety in the
event one (or both) fitted anchors are lost in an emergency situation.
Use of superior holding power anchors was subsequently approved by ABS
as long as the anchor was sufficiently tested, proven, and held an ABS
class certificate. ABS allows up to a 25 percent reduction in weight
(4,500 lbs each) for a total weight savings of over a ton.
The shipyard's market research included an ABS web based data
search for superior holding power anchors. Approximately forty three
(43) companies world-wide were identified that manufacture ABS approved
anchors of superior holding anchors. Of these, only two (2) were U.S.
manufacturers. Neither company produced an anchor of the correct size
that will fit in the ARRV's anchor pocket. The pocket cannot be made
larger because of the specialized hull shape of the ice-breaking bow as
described above.
The project's conclusion is that there are no U.S. manufacturers
who produce suitable superior holding power balanced anchors that meet
all of the ARRV requirements, so an exemption from the Buy American
requirements is necessary.
In the absence of a domestic supplier that could provide
requirements-compliant superior holding power anchors, UAF requested
that NSF issue a Section 1605 exemption determination with respect to
the purchase of foreign-supplied, requirements-compliant superior
holding power balanced anchors, so that the vessel will meet the
specific design and technical requirements that, as explained above,
are necessary for this vessel to be able to perform its mission
successfully. Furthermore, the shipyard's market research indicated
that superior holding power balanced anchors compliant with the ARRV's
technical specifications and requirements are commercially available
from foreign vendors within their standard product lines.
NSF's Division of Acquisition and Cooperative Support (DACS) and
other NSF program staff reviewed the UAF exemption request submittal,
found that it was complete, and determined that sufficient technical
information was provided in order for NSF to evaluate the exemption
request and to conclude that an exemption is needed and should be
granted.
III. Exemption
On February 15, 2012, based on the finding that no domestically
produced superior holding power balanced anchors met all of the ARRV's
technical specifications and requirements and pursuant to section
1605(b), the NSF Chief Financial Officer, in accordance with a
delegation order from the Director of the agency signed on May 27,
2010, granted a limited project exemption of the Recovery Act's Buy
American requirements with respect to the procurement of superior
holding power balanced anchors.
Dated: February 16, 2012.
Lawrence Rudolph,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-4233 Filed 2-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P