Notice of Buy American Waiver Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, 11163-11164 [2012-4233]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 37 / Friday, February 24, 2012 / Notices Dated: February 17, 2012. Lawrence Rudolph, General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2012–4235 Filed 2–23–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Notice of Buy American Waiver Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 AGENCY: National Science Foundation (NSF). ACTION: Notice. NSF is hereby granting a limited exemption of section 1605 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), Public Law 111–5, 123 Stat. 115, 303 (2009), with respect to the purchase of the superior holding power balanced anchors that will be used in the Alaska Region Research Vessel (ARRV). These anchors are required in order to accommodate the vessel’s ice breaking bow shape and they will save weight. DATES: February 24, 2012. ADDRESSES: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey Leithead, Division of Acquisition and Cooperative Support, 703–292– 4595. SUMMARY: In accordance with section 1605(c) of the Recovery Act and section 176.80 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the National Science Foundation (NSF) hereby provides notice that on February 15, 2012, the NSF Chief Financial Officer, in accordance with a delegation order from the Director of the agency, granted a limited project exemption of section 1605 of the Recovery Act (Buy American provision) with respect to the superior holding power balanced anchors that will be used in the ARRV. The basis for this exemption is section 1605(b)(2) of the Recovery Act, in that superior holding power balanced anchors of satisfactory quality are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available commercial quantities. The total cost of the three (3) required anchors (∼$42,360) represents less than 0.1% of the total $148 million Recovery Act award provided for construction of the ARRV. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Recovery Act appropriated $400 million to NSF for several projects being funded by the Foundation’s Major VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:34 Feb 23, 2012 Jkt 226001 Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) account. The ARRV is one of NSF’s MREFC projects. Section 1605(a) of the Recovery Act, the Buy American provision, states that none of the funds appropriated by the Act ‘‘may be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work unless all of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the United States.’’ The ARRV has been developed under a cooperative agreement awarded to the University of Alaska, Fairbanks (UAF) that began in 2007. UAF executed the shipyard contract in December 2009 and the project is currently under construction. The purpose of the Recovery Act is to stimulate economic recovery in part by funding current construction projects like the ARRV that are ‘‘shovel ready’’ without requiring projects to revise their standards and specifications, or to restart the bidding process again. Subsections 1605(b) and (c) of the Recovery Act authorize the head of a Federal department or agency to waive the Buy American provision if the head of the agency finds that: (1) Applying the provision would be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) the relevant goods are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality; or (3) the inclusion of the goods produced in the United States will increase the cost of the project by more than 25 percent. If the head of the Federal department or agency waives the Buy American provision, then the head of the department or agency is required to publish a detailed justification in the Federal Register. Finally, section 1605(d) of the Recovery Act states that the Buy American provision must be applied in a manner consistent with the United States’ obligations under international agreements. II. Finding That Relevant Goods Are Not Produced in the United States in Sufficient and Reasonably Available Quality The specification for the ARRV originally called for standard ‘‘stockless’’ anchors (the stock is the cross arm below the ring on an oldfashioned style anchor), which are in common use on commercial and military vessels. The design requirements in the specification for the anchoring system on the ARRV include: 1. Approved by the American Bureau of Shipping with regard to operability, quality and size/holding power (6,000 lbs). PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11163 2. The anchors drop immediately upon release. 3. The anchors do not jam in the hawse pipe (chain pipe between the hull and deck). 4. The anchors do not move when stowed in heavy seas. 5. The anchors ‘‘self-stow’’ against the hull. Failure to meet any of these technical requirements would have severe negative impacts on safety. Anchors are required not only for routine use in port or during operations, but in an emergency situation (for example, the loss of propulsion) to keep the vessel from going aground, damaging the hull and sinking. In this situation, the anchors must release from the ship quickly and efficiently. If proper anchors are not used, the safety of the vessel and the lives of everyone on board would be jeopardized. The ARRV is approved by the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) to ensure safe design, construction, and vessel operation. Since proper storage of the anchors in the bow of the ship is often difficult to achieve, the specification also called for the shipyard to construct a physical mock-up of the anchoring system, which includes the anchors, anchor pockets (recesses in the bow that keep the anchors from protruding beyond the hull), hawse pipes, and anchor winches. Through this process, it was found that the stockless anchor would not store properly in the pockets that were required to accommodate the ARRV’s specialized ice-breaking bow. To protect the anchors during ice operations, the pockets were originally set as high in the bow as possible. The only way to make the stockless anchor work would be to put the pockets excessively close to the water line, but that would be contrary to American Bureau of Shipping and international regulatory guidance for ice-classed vessels. Through continued testing with the mock-up, it was found that only a ‘‘balanced’’ anchor would work with the pockets in the proper location. A balanced anchor always stows with the flukes (the ‘‘hooks’’ that penetrate into the bottom) in the same position. The specification originally called for three (3) anchors; one on each side of the bow and one spare on deck. This configuration is typical for all commercial and military vessels. As part of the design effort to reduce weight, the shipyard originally proposed eliminating the spare anchor, which was not considered prudent by UAF. As an option, the use of three smaller, lighter ‘‘superior’’ holding power anchors was proposed during the anchoring system evaluation. This E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1 srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 11164 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 37 / Friday, February 24, 2012 / Notices approach was considered the best approach to enhance safety in the event one (or both) fitted anchors are lost in an emergency situation. Use of superior holding power anchors was subsequently approved by ABS as long as the anchor was sufficiently tested, proven, and held an ABS class certificate. ABS allows up to a 25 percent reduction in weight (4,500 lbs each) for a total weight savings of over a ton. The shipyard’s market research included an ABS web based data search for superior holding power anchors. Approximately forty three (43) companies world-wide were identified that manufacture ABS approved anchors of superior holding anchors. Of these, only two (2) were U.S. manufacturers. Neither company produced an anchor of the correct size that will fit in the ARRV’s anchor pocket. The pocket cannot be made larger because of the specialized hull shape of the icebreaking bow as described above. The project’s conclusion is that there are no U.S. manufacturers who produce suitable superior holding power balanced anchors that meet all of the ARRV requirements, so an exemption from the Buy American requirements is necessary. In the absence of a domestic supplier that could provide requirementscompliant superior holding power anchors, UAF requested that NSF issue a Section 1605 exemption determination with respect to the purchase of foreignsupplied, requirements-compliant superior holding power balanced anchors, so that the vessel will meet the specific design and technical requirements that, as explained above, are necessary for this vessel to be able to perform its mission successfully. Furthermore, the shipyard’s market research indicated that superior holding power balanced anchors compliant with the ARRV’s technical specifications and requirements are commercially available from foreign vendors within their standard product lines. NSF’s Division of Acquisition and Cooperative Support (DACS) and other NSF program staff reviewed the UAF exemption request submittal, found that it was complete, and determined that sufficient technical information was provided in order for NSF to evaluate the exemption request and to conclude that an exemption is needed and should be granted. III. Exemption On February 15, 2012, based on the finding that no domestically produced superior holding power balanced anchors met all of the ARRV’s technical VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:34 Feb 23, 2012 Jkt 226001 specifications and requirements and pursuant to section 1605(b), the NSF Chief Financial Officer, in accordance with a delegation order from the Director of the agency signed on May 27, 2010, granted a limited project exemption of the Recovery Act’s Buy American requirements with respect to the procurement of superior holding power balanced anchors. Dated: February 16, 2012. Lawrence Rudolph, General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2012–4233 Filed 2–22–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Notice of Proposal Review Meetings In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson, Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230. These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site: https://www.nsf.gov. This information may also be requested by telephoning, 703/292–8182. PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: February 21, 2012. Susanne Bolton, Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 2012–4306 Filed 2–23–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. NRC–2012–0047] Agency Information Collection Activities: Emergency Clearance Submission for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to submit an information collection request for emergency review to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and solicitation of public comment. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) invites public comment about our intention to request emergency review and OMB approval of the information collection that is summarized below. We are required to publish this notice in the Federal Register under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we have submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the following requirements for emergency review. We are requesting an emergency review because the collection of this information is needed before the expiration of the normal time limits under OMB’s regulations at 5 CFR 1320.13. This is necessary to ensure compliance with requirements in Section 402 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, ‘‘* * *’’ We cannot reasonably comply with the normal clearance procedures because the use of normal clearance procedures is reasonably likely to prevent or disrupt the collection of information as stated in 5 CFR 1320.13(a)(2)(iii). Information pertaining to the requirement to be submitted: 1. Type of submission, new, revision, or extension: New. 2. The title of the information collection: Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 and 93, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Event. 2. Current OMB approval number: Not applicable. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11163-11164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Buy American Waiver Under the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act of 2009

AGENCY: National Science Foundation (NSF).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NSF is hereby granting a limited exemption of section 1605 of 
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), 
Public Law 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, 303 (2009), with respect to the 
purchase of the superior holding power balanced anchors that will be 
used in the Alaska Region Research Vessel (ARRV). These anchors are 
required in order to accommodate the vessel's ice breaking bow shape 
and they will save weight.

DATES: February 24, 2012.

ADDRESSES: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, 
Virginia 22230.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey Leithead, Division of 
Acquisition and Cooperative Support, 703-292-4595.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 1605(c) of the 
Recovery Act and section 176.80 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations, the National Science Foundation (NSF) hereby provides 
notice that on February 15, 2012, the NSF Chief Financial Officer, in 
accordance with a delegation order from the Director of the agency, 
granted a limited project exemption of section 1605 of the Recovery Act 
(Buy American provision) with respect to the superior holding power 
balanced anchors that will be used in the ARRV. The basis for this 
exemption is section 1605(b)(2) of the Recovery Act, in that superior 
holding power balanced anchors of satisfactory quality are not produced 
in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available commercial 
quantities. The total cost of the three (3) required anchors (~$42,360) 
represents less than 0.1% of the total $148 million Recovery Act award 
provided for construction of the ARRV.

I. Background

    The Recovery Act appropriated $400 million to NSF for several 
projects being funded by the Foundation's Major Research Equipment and 
Facilities Construction (MREFC) account. The ARRV is one of NSF's MREFC 
projects. Section 1605(a) of the Recovery Act, the Buy American 
provision, states that none of the funds appropriated by the Act ``may 
be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or 
repair of a public building or public work unless all of the iron, 
steel, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the 
United States.''
    The ARRV has been developed under a cooperative agreement awarded 
to the University of Alaska, Fairbanks (UAF) that began in 2007. UAF 
executed the shipyard contract in December 2009 and the project is 
currently under construction. The purpose of the Recovery Act is to 
stimulate economic recovery in part by funding current construction 
projects like the ARRV that are ``shovel ready'' without requiring 
projects to revise their standards and specifications, or to restart 
the bidding process again.
    Subsections 1605(b) and (c) of the Recovery Act authorize the head 
of a Federal department or agency to waive the Buy American provision 
if the head of the agency finds that: (1) Applying the provision would 
be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) the relevant goods are 
not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably 
available quantities and of a satisfactory quality; or (3) the 
inclusion of the goods produced in the United States will increase the 
cost of the project by more than 25 percent. If the head of the Federal 
department or agency waives the Buy American provision, then the head 
of the department or agency is required to publish a detailed 
justification in the Federal Register. Finally, section 1605(d) of the 
Recovery Act states that the Buy American provision must be applied in 
a manner consistent with the United States' obligations under 
international agreements.

II. Finding That Relevant Goods Are Not Produced in the United States 
in Sufficient and Reasonably Available Quality

    The specification for the ARRV originally called for standard 
``stockless'' anchors (the stock is the cross arm below the ring on an 
old-fashioned style anchor), which are in common use on commercial and 
military vessels. The design requirements in the specification for the 
anchoring system on the ARRV include:
    1. Approved by the American Bureau of Shipping with regard to 
operability, quality and size/holding power (6,000 lbs).
    2. The anchors drop immediately upon release.
    3. The anchors do not jam in the hawse pipe (chain pipe between the 
hull and deck).
    4. The anchors do not move when stowed in heavy seas.
    5. The anchors ``self-stow'' against the hull.
    Failure to meet any of these technical requirements would have 
severe negative impacts on safety. Anchors are required not only for 
routine use in port or during operations, but in an emergency situation 
(for example, the loss of propulsion) to keep the vessel from going 
aground, damaging the hull and sinking. In this situation, the anchors 
must release from the ship quickly and efficiently. If proper anchors 
are not used, the safety of the vessel and the lives of everyone on 
board would be jeopardized. The ARRV is approved by the American Bureau 
of Shipping (ABS) to ensure safe design, construction, and vessel 
operation.
    Since proper storage of the anchors in the bow of the ship is often 
difficult to achieve, the specification also called for the shipyard to 
construct a physical mock-up of the anchoring system, which includes 
the anchors, anchor pockets (recesses in the bow that keep the anchors 
from protruding beyond the hull), hawse pipes, and anchor winches. 
Through this process, it was found that the stockless anchor would not 
store properly in the pockets that were required to accommodate the 
ARRV's specialized ice-breaking bow. To protect the anchors during ice 
operations, the pockets were originally set as high in the bow as 
possible. The only way to make the stockless anchor work would be to 
put the pockets excessively close to the water line, but that would be 
contrary to American Bureau of Shipping and international regulatory 
guidance for ice-classed vessels. Through continued testing with the 
mock-up, it was found that only a ``balanced'' anchor would work with 
the pockets in the proper location. A balanced anchor always stows with 
the flukes (the ``hooks'' that penetrate into the bottom) in the same 
position.
    The specification originally called for three (3) anchors; one on 
each side of the bow and one spare on deck. This configuration is 
typical for all commercial and military vessels. As part of the design 
effort to reduce weight, the shipyard originally proposed eliminating 
the spare anchor, which was not considered prudent by UAF. As an 
option, the use of three smaller, lighter ``superior'' holding power 
anchors was proposed during the anchoring system evaluation. This

[[Page 11164]]

approach was considered the best approach to enhance safety in the 
event one (or both) fitted anchors are lost in an emergency situation. 
Use of superior holding power anchors was subsequently approved by ABS 
as long as the anchor was sufficiently tested, proven, and held an ABS 
class certificate. ABS allows up to a 25 percent reduction in weight 
(4,500 lbs each) for a total weight savings of over a ton.
    The shipyard's market research included an ABS web based data 
search for superior holding power anchors. Approximately forty three 
(43) companies world-wide were identified that manufacture ABS approved 
anchors of superior holding anchors. Of these, only two (2) were U.S. 
manufacturers. Neither company produced an anchor of the correct size 
that will fit in the ARRV's anchor pocket. The pocket cannot be made 
larger because of the specialized hull shape of the ice-breaking bow as 
described above.
    The project's conclusion is that there are no U.S. manufacturers 
who produce suitable superior holding power balanced anchors that meet 
all of the ARRV requirements, so an exemption from the Buy American 
requirements is necessary.
    In the absence of a domestic supplier that could provide 
requirements-compliant superior holding power anchors, UAF requested 
that NSF issue a Section 1605 exemption determination with respect to 
the purchase of foreign-supplied, requirements-compliant superior 
holding power balanced anchors, so that the vessel will meet the 
specific design and technical requirements that, as explained above, 
are necessary for this vessel to be able to perform its mission 
successfully. Furthermore, the shipyard's market research indicated 
that superior holding power balanced anchors compliant with the ARRV's 
technical specifications and requirements are commercially available 
from foreign vendors within their standard product lines.
    NSF's Division of Acquisition and Cooperative Support (DACS) and 
other NSF program staff reviewed the UAF exemption request submittal, 
found that it was complete, and determined that sufficient technical 
information was provided in order for NSF to evaluate the exemption 
request and to conclude that an exemption is needed and should be 
granted.

III. Exemption

    On February 15, 2012, based on the finding that no domestically 
produced superior holding power balanced anchors met all of the ARRV's 
technical specifications and requirements and pursuant to section 
1605(b), the NSF Chief Financial Officer, in accordance with a 
delegation order from the Director of the agency signed on May 27, 
2010, granted a limited project exemption of the Recovery Act's Buy 
American requirements with respect to the procurement of superior 
holding power balanced anchors.

    Dated: February 16, 2012.
Lawrence Rudolph,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-4233 Filed 2-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.