Trademark Petitions, 10482-10483 [2012-4085]
Download as PDF
10482
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Notices
Company
Structure
Dates
Marine mammals sighted
(individuals)
ERT ........
South Marsh Island Area, Block 107,
Platform B.
July 23 and August 4 to 8, 2011 .......
None ...................................................
Pursuant to these regulations, NMFS
has issued an LOA to ERT and Demex.
Issuance of the LOAs is based on a
finding made in the preamble to the
final rule that the total taking by these
activities (with monitoring, mitigation,
and reporting measures) will result in
no more than a negligible impact on the
affected species or stock(s) of marine
mammals and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on
subsistence uses. NMFS will review
reports to ensure that the applicants are
in compliance with meeting the
requirements contained in the
implementing regulations and LOA,
including monitoring, mitigation, and
reporting requirements.
Dated: February 16, 2012.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–4117 Filed 2–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Trademark Petitions
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email:
InformationCollection@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0061 comment’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Feb 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of
Catherine Cain, Attorney Advisor,
Office of the Commissioner for
Trademarks, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1451,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1451, by
telephone at 571–272–8946, or by email
to catherine.cain@uspto.gov, with
‘‘Paperwork’’ in the subject line.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) administers
the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et
seq., which provides for the Federal
registration of trademarks, service
marks, collective trademarks and service
marks, collective membership marks,
and certification marks. Individuals and
businesses that use or intend to use
such marks in commerce may file an
application to register their marks with
the USPTO. Individuals and businesses
may also submit various
communications to the USPTO,
including letters of protest, requests to
make special, responses to petition
inquiry letters, petitions to make
special, requests to restore a filing date,
and requests for reinstatement.
A letter of protest is an informal
procedure whereby third parties who
object to the registration of a mark in a
pending application may bring to the
attention of the USPTO evidence
bearing on the registrability of a mark.
A letter of protest must identify the
application being protested and the
proposed grounds for refusing
registration and include relevant
evidence to support the protest.
A request to make special may be
submitted where an applicant’s prior
registration was cancelled due to the
inadvertent failure to file a post
registration maintenance document and
should include an explanation of why
special action is appropriate.
A response to a petition inquiry letter
is submitted by a petitioner who is
responding to a notice of deficiency that
the USPTO issued after receiving an
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Biological
impacts observed to
marine
mammals
None.
incomplete Petition to the Director. A
petition may be considered incomplete
if, for example, it does not include the
fee required by 37 CFR 2.6 or if it
includes an unverified assertion that is
not supported by evidence.
The USPTO generally examines
applications in the order in which they
are received. A petition to make special
is a request by the applicant to advance
the initial examination of an application
out of its regular order.
A request to restore a filing date is
submitted by an applicant who
previously filed an application that was
denied a filing date. The request must
include evidence showing that the
applicant is entitled to the earlier filing
date.
If an applicant has proof that an
application was inadvertently
abandoned due to a USPTO error, an
applicant may file a request to reinstate
the application instead of a formal
petition to revive. To support such a
request, the applicant must include
clear evidence of the USPTO error.
The information in this collection can
be submitted in paper format or
electronically through the Trademark
Electronic Application System (TEAS).
The USPTO has developed a TEAS
Global Form format that permits the
agency to collect information
electronically for which a TEAS form
with dedicated data fields is not yet
available. With the introduction of the
TEAS Global Forms, the information in
this collection can be collected in paper
format or electronically using the TEAS
Global Forms.
As part of this renewal the USPTO
proposes to add four TEAS Global
Forms—for responses to petition inquiry
letter, petitions to make special,
requests to restore filing date, and
requests for reinstatement—into the
collection. The paper equivalents for the
response to petition inquiry letter,
petition to make special, request to
restore filing date, and request for
reinstatement will be added as well.
Although this collection does have
electronic forms, there are no official
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
10483
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Notices
paper forms for these filings.
Individuals and businesses can submit
their own paper forms following the
USPTO’s rules and guidelines to ensure
that all of the necessary information is
provided.
II. Method of Collection
Electronically, if applicants submit
the information using the new TEAS
Global Forms. By mail, facsimile, or
hand delivery if applicants choose to
submit the information in paper form.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0061.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Primarily businesses
or other for-profit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,135 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
public approximately 30 minutes (0.50
hours) to one hour to gather the
necessary information, create the
document, and submit the completed
request, depending upon whether the
information is submitted electronically
or on paper.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 1,689 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $574,260. The USPTO
expects that the information in this
collection will be prepared by attorneys
at an estimated rate of $340 per hour.
Therefore, the USPTO estimates that the
respondent cost burden for this
collection will be approximately
$574,260 per year.
Item
Estimated
time for
response
Letter of Protest (TEAS Global) ....................................................................................................
Letter of Protest (Paper) ...............................................................................................................
Request to Make Special (TEAS Global) .....................................................................................
Request to Make Special (Paper) .................................................................................................
Response to Petition to Director Inquiry Letter (TEAS Global) ....................................................
Response to Petition to Director Inquiry Letter (Paper) ...............................................................
Petition to Make Special (TEAS Global) .......................................................................................
Petition to Make Special (Paper) ..................................................................................................
Request to Restore Filing Date (TEAS Global) ............................................................................
Request to Restore Filing Date (Paper) .......................................................................................
Request for Reinstatement (TEAS Global) ...................................................................................
Request for Reinstatement (Paper) ..............................................................................................
Totals ......................................................................................................................................
Estimated Total Annual (Non-hour)
Respondent Cost Burden: $15,550. This
collection has annual (non-hour) costs
in the form of postage costs and filing
fees.
The public may submit the nonelectronic information in this collection
to the USPTO by mail through the
United States Postal Service. The
USPTO estimates that the majority of
submissions for these paper forms are
made via first-class mail at a cost of 45
cents per submission. The total
estimated postage cost for this collection
Estimated annual
responses
Estimated
annual burden
hours
50 minutes ...
1 hour ...........
30 minutes ...
40 minutes ...
30 minutes ...
40 minutes ...
30 minutes ...
40 minutes ...
30 minutes ...
40 minutes ...
30 minutes ...
40 minutes ...
187
1,063
90
10
19
5
135
15
1
10
480
120
155
1,063
45
7
10
3
68
10
1
7
240
80
......................
2,135
1,689
is $550 (1,223 paper submissions ×
$0.45).
The only item in this information
collection with a filing fee is the
Petition to Make Special, with a filing
fee of $100. The total estimated filing
fee cost for this collection is $15,000.
Responses
Filing fee
($)
Total non-hour
cost burden
(a) × (b)
(a)
Item
(b)
(c)
Petition to Make Special (TEAS Global) .....................................................................................
Petition to Make Special (Paper) .................................................................................................
135
15
$100.00
100.00
$13,500.00
1,500.00
Total ......................................................................................................................................
150
........................
15,000.00
Therefore, the total estimated (nonhour) respondent cost burden in postage
costs and filing fees for this information
collection is $15,550.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Feb 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, e.g., the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Dated: February 16, 2012.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–4085 Filed 2–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10482-10483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4085]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Trademark Petitions
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0061 comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of Catherine Cain, Attorney
Advisor, Office of the Commissioner for Trademarks, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451,
by telephone at 571-272-8946, or by email to catherine.cain@uspto.gov,
with ``Paperwork'' in the subject line. Additional information about
this collection is also available at https://www.reginfo.gov under
``Information Collection Review.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) administers
the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq., which provides for the
Federal registration of trademarks, service marks, collective
trademarks and service marks, collective membership marks, and
certification marks. Individuals and businesses that use or intend to
use such marks in commerce may file an application to register their
marks with the USPTO. Individuals and businesses may also submit
various communications to the USPTO, including letters of protest,
requests to make special, responses to petition inquiry letters,
petitions to make special, requests to restore a filing date, and
requests for reinstatement.
A letter of protest is an informal procedure whereby third parties
who object to the registration of a mark in a pending application may
bring to the attention of the USPTO evidence bearing on the
registrability of a mark. A letter of protest must identify the
application being protested and the proposed grounds for refusing
registration and include relevant evidence to support the protest.
A request to make special may be submitted where an applicant's
prior registration was cancelled due to the inadvertent failure to file
a post registration maintenance document and should include an
explanation of why special action is appropriate.
A response to a petition inquiry letter is submitted by a
petitioner who is responding to a notice of deficiency that the USPTO
issued after receiving an incomplete Petition to the Director. A
petition may be considered incomplete if, for example, it does not
include the fee required by 37 CFR 2.6 or if it includes an unverified
assertion that is not supported by evidence.
The USPTO generally examines applications in the order in which
they are received. A petition to make special is a request by the
applicant to advance the initial examination of an application out of
its regular order.
A request to restore a filing date is submitted by an applicant who
previously filed an application that was denied a filing date. The
request must include evidence showing that the applicant is entitled to
the earlier filing date.
If an applicant has proof that an application was inadvertently
abandoned due to a USPTO error, an applicant may file a request to
reinstate the application instead of a formal petition to revive. To
support such a request, the applicant must include clear evidence of
the USPTO error.
The information in this collection can be submitted in paper format
or electronically through the Trademark Electronic Application System
(TEAS). The USPTO has developed a TEAS Global Form format that permits
the agency to collect information electronically for which a TEAS form
with dedicated data fields is not yet available. With the introduction
of the TEAS Global Forms, the information in this collection can be
collected in paper format or electronically using the TEAS Global
Forms.
As part of this renewal the USPTO proposes to add four TEAS Global
Forms--for responses to petition inquiry letter, petitions to make
special, requests to restore filing date, and requests for
reinstatement--into the collection. The paper equivalents for the
response to petition inquiry letter, petition to make special, request
to restore filing date, and request for reinstatement will be added as
well.
Although this collection does have electronic forms, there are no
official
[[Page 10483]]
paper forms for these filings. Individuals and businesses can submit
their own paper forms following the USPTO's rules and guidelines to
ensure that all of the necessary information is provided.
II. Method of Collection
Electronically, if applicants submit the information using the new
TEAS Global Forms. By mail, facsimile, or hand delivery if applicants
choose to submit the information in paper form.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0061.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Primarily businesses or other for-profit
organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,135 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
the public approximately 30 minutes (0.50 hours) to one hour to gather
the necessary information, create the document, and submit the
completed request, depending upon whether the information is submitted
electronically or on paper.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 1,689 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $574,260. The USPTO
expects that the information in this collection will be prepared by
attorneys at an estimated rate of $340 per hour. Therefore, the USPTO
estimates that the respondent cost burden for this collection will be
approximately $574,260 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Item Estimated time for response annual annual burden
responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter of Protest (TEAS Global).............. 50 minutes....................... 187 155
Letter of Protest (Paper).................... 1 hour........................... 1,063 1,063
Request to Make Special (TEAS Global)........ 30 minutes....................... 90 45
Request to Make Special (Paper).............. 40 minutes....................... 10 7
Response to Petition to Director Inquiry 30 minutes....................... 19 10
Letter (TEAS Global).
Response to Petition to Director Inquiry 40 minutes....................... 5 3
Letter (Paper).
Petition to Make Special (TEAS Global)....... 30 minutes....................... 135 68
Petition to Make Special (Paper)............. 40 minutes....................... 15 10
Request to Restore Filing Date (TEAS Global). 30 minutes....................... 1 1
Request to Restore Filing Date (Paper)....... 40 minutes....................... 10 7
Request for Reinstatement (TEAS Global)...... 30 minutes....................... 480 240
Request for Reinstatement (Paper)............ 40 minutes....................... 120 80
------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals................................... ................................. 2,135 1,689
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual (Non-hour) Respondent Cost Burden: $15,550.
This collection has annual (non-hour) costs in the form of postage
costs and filing fees.
The public may submit the non-electronic information in this
collection to the USPTO by mail through the United States Postal
Service. The USPTO estimates that the majority of submissions for these
paper forms are made via first-class mail at a cost of 45 cents per
submission. The total estimated postage cost for this collection is
$550 (1,223 paper submissions x $0.45).
The only item in this information collection with a filing fee is
the Petition to Make Special, with a filing fee of $100. The total
estimated filing fee cost for this collection is $15,000.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total non-hour
Item Responses Filing fee ($) cost burden
(a) x (b)
(a) (b) (c)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petition to Make Special (TEAS Global).......................... 135 $100.00 $13,500.00
Petition to Make Special (Paper)................................ 15 100.00 1,500.00
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 150 .............. 15,000.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, the total estimated (non-hour) respondent cost burden in
postage costs and filing fees for this information collection is
$15,550.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: February 16, 2012.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-4085 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P