Federal Acquisition Regulation; Unallowability of Costs Associated With Foreign Contractor Excise Tax, 10461-10463 [2012-3905]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
section 338E of the Act shall be made
within one year of the date the
participant breached his or her Loan
Repayment Program Contract, unless the
NIH specifically authorizes a longer
period. Terminations will not be
considered a breach of contract in cases
where such terminations are beyond the
control of the participant as follows:
(a) Terminations for convenience of
the Government will not be considered
a breach of contract and monetary
damages will not be assessed.
(b) Occasionally, a participant’s
research assignment or funding may
evolve and change to the extent that the
individual is no longer engaged in
approved research. Similarly, the
research needs and priorities of the IC
and/or the NIH may change to the extent
that a determination is made that a
health professional’s skills may be better
utilized in a nonresearch assignment.
Normally, job changes of this nature
will not be considered a breach of
contract on the part of either the NIH or
the participant. Under these
circumstances, the following will apply:
(1) Program participation will cease as
of the date an individual is no longer
engaged in approved research;
(2) Based on the approval of the NIH,
the participant will be released from the
remainder of his or her service
obligation without assessment of
damages or monetary penalties. The
participant in this case will be
permitted to retain all Program benefits
made or owed by the NIH on his/her
behalf up to the date the individual is
no longer engaged in research, less the
pro rata portion of any benefits
advanced beyond the period of
completed service.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 68.14 Under what circumstances can the
service or payment obligation be canceled,
waived, or suspended?
(a) Any obligation of a participant for
service or payment will be canceled
upon the death of the participant.
(b) The NIH may waive or suspend
any service or payment obligation
incurred by the participant upon request
whenever compliance by the
participant: (1) Is impossible, (2) would
involve extreme hardship to the
participant, or (3) if enforcement of the
service or payment obligation would be
unconscionable. The NIH may approve
a request for a suspension of the service
or payment obligations for a period of
up to one (1) year.
(c) Compliance by a participant with
a service or payment obligation will be
considered impossible if the NIH
determines, on the basis of information
and documentation as may be required,
that the participant suffers from a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Feb 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
permanent physical or mental disability
resulting in the inability of the
participant to perform the service or
other activities that would be necessary
to comply with the obligation.
(d) In determining whether to waive
or suspend any or all of the service or
payment obligations of a participant as
imposing an undue hardship and being
against good conscience, the NIH, on the
basis of such information and
documentation as may be required, will
consider: (1) The participant’s present
financial resources and obligations; (2)
the participant’s estimated future
financial resources and obligations; and
(3) the extent to which the participant
has problems of a personal nature, such
as a physical or mental disability or
terminal illness in the immediate
family, which so intrude on the
participant’s present and future ability
to perform as to raise a presumption that
the individual will be unable to perform
the obligation incurred.
§ 68.15 When can an NIH LRP payment
obligation be discharged in bankruptcy?
Any payment obligation incurred
under § 68.13 may be discharged in
bankruptcy under Title 11 of the United
States Code only if such discharge is
granted after the expiration of the sevenyear period beginning on the first date
that payment is required and only if the
bankruptcy court finds that a
nondischarge of the obligation would be
unconscionable.
§ 68.16
Additional conditions.
(a) When a shortage of funds exists,
participants may be funded only
partially, as determined by the NIH.
However, once an NIH LRP contract has
been signed by both parties, the NIH
will obligate such funds as necessary to
ensure that sufficient funds will be
available to pay benefits for the duration
of the period of obligated service unless,
by mutual written agreement, the parties
specify otherwise.
(b) Additional conditions may be
imposed as deemed necessary.
§ 68.17 What other regulations and
statutes apply?
Several other regulations and statutes
apply to this part. These include, but are
not necessarily limited to:
Debt Collection Act of 1982 (31 U.S.C.
3701 note);
Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681 et seq.);
Federal Debt Collection Procedures
Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 176); and Privacy
Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10461
Dated: September 28, 2011.
Francis S. Collins,
Director, NIH, National Institutes of Health.
Approved: February 7, 2012.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–3900 Filed 2–21–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 31 and 52
[FAR Case 2011–011; Docket 2011–0011;
Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM13
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Unallowability of Costs Associated
With Foreign Contractor Excise Tax
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCIES:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement the requirements of the
James Zadroga 9/11 Health and
Compensation Act of 2010 regarding the
imposition of a 2 percent tax on certain
foreign procurements.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addressees
shown below on or before April 23,
2012 to be considered in the formation
of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR case 2011–011 by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
inputting ‘‘FAR Case 2011–011’’ under
the heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and
selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘FAR Case 2011–011.’’ Follow the
instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘FAR Case 2011–011’’ on your attached
document.
• Fax: (202) 501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), Attn: Hada Flowers, 1275 First
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22FEP1.SGM
22FEP1
10462
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
Street NE., 7th Floor, Washington, DC
20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR Case 2011–011, in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edward N. Chambers, Procurement
Analyst, at (202) 501–3221 for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at (202) 501–4755. Please
cite FAR Case 2011–011.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing
to revise the FAR to implement a policy
that imposes on any foreign person that
receives a specified Federal
procurement payment a tax equal to 2
percent of the amount of such specified
Federal procurement payment.
Additionally, the law stipulates that no
funds are to be disbursed to any foreign
contractor in order to reimburse the tax
imposed (26 U.S.C. 5000C Note).
The James Zadroga 9/11 Health and
Compensation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
347) was signed into law and effective
on January 2, 2011. Section 301 of the
law amends the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986 by adding a new Section 5000C,
Imposition of tax on certain foreign
procurements (26 U.S.C. 5000C). This
new section imposes on any foreign
person that receives a specified Federal
procurement payment a tax equal to 2
percent of the amount of such specified
Federal procurement payment.
Additionally, the law stipulates that no
funds are to be disbursed to any foreign
contractor in order to reimburse the tax
imposed (26 U.S.C. 5000C Note).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Discussion and Analysis
To comply with the law, the FAR
Council is proposing to amend FAR
31.205–41 to inform the Government
and contractors that the costs of the 2
percent tax are not allowable, and at
FAR 52.229–3, 52.229–4, 52.229–6 and
52.229–7, to provide that the costs for
the 2 percent tax are not included in
foreign fixed-price contracts and foreign
fixed-price contracts with foreign
governments. The law states that it
‘‘shall be applied in a manner consistent
with international agreements.’’ The law
states that the 2 percent excise tax is
applied to foreign persons that receive
Federal procurement payments
pursuant to a contract with the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Feb 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
Government of the United States for the
provision of goods, if such goods are
manufactured or produced in a covered
country, or for the provision of services
if those services are provided in a
covered country. ‘‘Covered country’’
means a country that is not a country
that is party to an international
procurement agreement with the United
States. ‘‘Foreign person’’ means any
person (including any individual,
partnership, corporation, or other form
of association) other than a United
States person. The law applies to
contracts entered into on or after
January 2, 2011. The procedures for
withholding this 2 percent tax are being
handled in a separate FAR case.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The change may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is
summarized as follows:
At this time an estimate of the number of
small entities to which this rule will apply
is not available. The 2 percent excise tax is
only applied to foreign persons that receive
Federal procurement payments pursuant to a
contract with the Government of the United
States for the provision of goods, if such
goods are manufactured or produced in a
covered country, or for the provision of
services if those services are provided in a
covered country. ‘‘Foreign person’’ means
any person (including any individual,
partnership, corporation, or other form of
association) other than a United States
person. ‘‘Covered country’’ means a country
that is not a country that is party to an
international procurement agreement with
the United States.
The Regulatory Secretariat has
submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Business Administration. A copy of the
IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat. DoD, GSA and
NASA invite comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by this rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested
parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610
(FAR Case 2011–011) in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 31 and
52
Government procurement.
Dated: February 14, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
propose amending 48 CFR parts 31 and
52 as set forth below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 31 and 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 31—CONTRACT COST
PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURE
2. Amend section 31.205–41 by
adding paragraph (b)(8) to read as
follows:
31.205–41
Taxes.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) Any tax imposed under 26 U.S.C.
5000C.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
3. Amend section 52.229–3 by
revising the date of the clause and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
52.229–3
*
*
Federal, State, and Local Taxes.
*
*
*
Federal, State, and Local Taxes (date)
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) The contract price includes all
applicable Federal, State, and local
E:\FR\FM\22FEP1.SGM
22FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 2012 / Proposed Rules
taxes and duties, except as provided in
subparagraph (b)(2)(i) of this clause.
(2) Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C.
5000C may not be—
(i) Included in the contract price; nor
(ii) Reimbursed.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Amend section 52.229–4 by
revising the date of the clause and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
52.229–4 Federal, State, and Local Taxes
(State and Local Adjustments).
*
*
*
*
*
Federal, State, and Local Taxes (state
and local adjustments) (Date)
*
*
*
*
(b)(1) Unless otherwise provided in
this contract, the contract price includes
all applicable Federal, State, and local
taxes and duties, except as provided in
subparagraph (b)(2)(i) of this clause.
(2) Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C.
5000C may not be—
(i) Included in the contract price; nor
(ii) Reimbursed.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Amend section 52.229–6 by:
(a) Revising the date of the clause;
(b) Redesignating paragraph (c) as
(c)(1); removing from the newly
designated paragraph (c)(1) ‘‘States.’’
and adding ‘‘States, except as provided
in subparagraph (c)(2) of this clause.’’ in
its place;
(c) Adding a new paragraph (c)(2);
(d) Redesignating paragraph (d) as
(d)(1); removing from the newly
designated paragraph (d)(1) ‘‘The
contract price shall’’ and adding
‘‘Except as provided in subparagraph
(d)(2) of this clause, the contract price
shall’’ in its place; and
(e) Adding a new paragraph (d)(2).
The revised and newly added text
reads as follows:
52.229–6 Taxes-Foreign Fixed—Price
Contracts.
*
*
*
*
Taxes-Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts
(Date)
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) * * *
(2) Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C.
5000C may not be—
(i) Included in the contract price; nor
(ii) Reimbursed.
(d)(1) * * *
(2) The contract price may not be
increased to offset taxes imposed under
26 U.S.C. 5000c.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Amend section 52.229–7 by:
a. Revising the date of the clause;
b. Redesignating paragraph (b) as
(b)(1); and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:14 Feb 21, 2012
Jkt 226001
52.229–7 Taxes-Foreign Fixed-Price
Contract With Foreign Governments.
*
*
*
*
*
Taxes-Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts
With Foreign Governments (Date)
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C.
5000c may not be included in the
contract price.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–3905 Filed 2–21–12; 8:45 am]
*
*
c. Adding a new paragraph (b)(2).
The revised and newly added text
reads as follows:
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 120208116–2115–01]
RIN 0648–BB83
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Proposed 2012–2013 Northeast
Skate Complex Fishery Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This rule proposes catch
limits and associated measures for the
Northeast Skate Complex Fishery for the
2012–2013 fishing years. The proposed
action was developed by the New
England Fishery Management Council
pursuant to the provisions of the
Northeast Skate Complex Fishery
Management Plan. The proposed catch
limits are supported by the best
available scientific information and
reflect recent increases in skate biomass.
DATES: Public comments must be
received no later than 5 p.m., eastern
standard time, on March 23, 2012.
ADDRESSES: An environmental
assessment (EA) was prepared that
describes the proposed action and other
considered alternatives, and provides a
thorough analysis of the impacts of the
proposed measures and alternatives.
Copies of the EA and the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
are available on request from Paul J.
Howard, Executive Director, New
England Fishery Management Council,
50 Water Street, Newburyport, MA
01950. These documents are also
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10463
available online at https://
www.nefmc.org.
You may submit comments, identified
by NOAA–NMFS–2012–0015, by any
one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
www.regulations.gov. To submit
comments via the e-Rulemaking Portal,
first click the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
icon, and then enter ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–
2012–0015’’ in the keyword search.
Locate the document you wish to
comment on from the resulting list, and
click on the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ icon
on the right of that line.
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: Tobey
Curtis.
• Mail: Daniel Morris, Acting
Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope,
‘‘Comments on Skate Specifications.’’
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov. All personal
identifying information (e.g., name,
address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by
the sender will be publicly accessible.
Do not submit confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect,
or Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9273; fax: (978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The New England Fishery
Management Council (Council) is
responsible for developing management
measures for skate fisheries in the
northeastern U.S. through the Northeast
Skate Complex Fishery Management
Plan (Skate FMP). Seven skate species
are managed under the Skate FMP:
Winter, little, thorny, barndoor, smooth,
clearnose, and rosette. The Council’s
Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) reviews the best available
information on the status of skate
E:\FR\FM\22FEP1.SGM
22FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10461-10463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3905]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 31 and 52
[FAR Case 2011-011; Docket 2011-0011; Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM13
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Unallowability of Costs
Associated With Foreign Contractor Excise Tax
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement the requirements of the James
Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010 regarding the
imposition of a 2 percent tax on certain foreign procurements.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addressees shown below on or
before April 23, 2012 to be considered in the formation of the final
rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR case 2011-011 by any of
the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by inputting ``FAR Case
2011-011'' under the heading ``Enter Keyword or ID'' and selecting
``Search.'' Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with
``FAR Case 2011-011.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit
a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any),
and ``FAR Case 2011-011'' on your attached document.
Fax: (202) 501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), Attn: Hada Flowers, 1275 First
[[Page 10462]]
Street NE., 7th Floor, Washington, DC 20417.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2011-
011, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Edward N. Chambers, Procurement
Analyst, at (202) 501-3221 for clarification of content. For
information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the
Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501-4755. Please cite FAR Case 2011-
011.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to revise the FAR to implement a
policy that imposes on any foreign person that receives a specified
Federal procurement payment a tax equal to 2 percent of the amount of
such specified Federal procurement payment. Additionally, the law
stipulates that no funds are to be disbursed to any foreign contractor
in order to reimburse the tax imposed (26 U.S.C. 5000C Note).
The James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010 (Pub. L.
111-347) was signed into law and effective on January 2, 2011. Section
301 of the law amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by adding a new
Section 5000C, Imposition of tax on certain foreign procurements (26
U.S.C. 5000C). This new section imposes on any foreign person that
receives a specified Federal procurement payment a tax equal to 2
percent of the amount of such specified Federal procurement payment.
Additionally, the law stipulates that no funds are to be disbursed to
any foreign contractor in order to reimburse the tax imposed (26 U.S.C.
5000C Note).
II. Discussion and Analysis
To comply with the law, the FAR Council is proposing to amend FAR
31.205-41 to inform the Government and contractors that the costs of
the 2 percent tax are not allowable, and at FAR 52.229-3, 52.229-4,
52.229-6 and 52.229-7, to provide that the costs for the 2 percent tax
are not included in foreign fixed-price contracts and foreign fixed-
price contracts with foreign governments. The law states that it
``shall be applied in a manner consistent with international
agreements.'' The law states that the 2 percent excise tax is applied
to foreign persons that receive Federal procurement payments pursuant
to a contract with the Government of the United States for the
provision of goods, if such goods are manufactured or produced in a
covered country, or for the provision of services if those services are
provided in a covered country. ``Covered country'' means a country that
is not a country that is party to an international procurement
agreement with the United States. ``Foreign person'' means any person
(including any individual, partnership, corporation, or other form of
association) other than a United States person. The law applies to
contracts entered into on or after January 2, 2011. The procedures for
withholding this 2 percent tax are being handled in a separate FAR
case.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to
review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The change may have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is summarized as follows:
At this time an estimate of the number of small entities to
which this rule will apply is not available. The 2 percent excise
tax is only applied to foreign persons that receive Federal
procurement payments pursuant to a contract with the Government of
the United States for the provision of goods, if such goods are
manufactured or produced in a covered country, or for the provision
of services if those services are provided in a covered country.
``Foreign person'' means any person (including any individual,
partnership, corporation, or other form of association) other than a
United States person. ``Covered country'' means a country that is
not a country that is party to an international procurement
agreement with the United States.
The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy
of the IRFA may be obtained from the Regulatory Secretariat. DoD, GSA
and NASA invite comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case 2011-011) in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 31 and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: February 14, 2012.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose amending 48 CFR parts 31 and
52 as set forth below:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 31 and 52 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 31--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURE
2. Amend section 31.205-41 by adding paragraph (b)(8) to read as
follows:
31.205-41 Taxes.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) Any tax imposed under 26 U.S.C. 5000C.
* * * * *
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
3. Amend section 52.229-3 by revising the date of the clause and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
52.229-3 Federal, State, and Local Taxes.
* * * * *
Federal, State, and Local Taxes (date)
* * * * *
(b)(1) The contract price includes all applicable Federal, State,
and local
[[Page 10463]]
taxes and duties, except as provided in subparagraph (b)(2)(i) of this
clause.
(2) Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C. 5000C may not be--
(i) Included in the contract price; nor
(ii) Reimbursed.
* * * * *
4. Amend section 52.229-4 by revising the date of the clause and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
52.229-4 Federal, State, and Local Taxes (State and Local
Adjustments).
* * * * *
Federal, State, and Local Taxes (state and local adjustments) (Date)
* * * * *
(b)(1) Unless otherwise provided in this contract, the contract
price includes all applicable Federal, State, and local taxes and
duties, except as provided in subparagraph (b)(2)(i) of this clause.
(2) Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C. 5000C may not be--
(i) Included in the contract price; nor
(ii) Reimbursed.
* * * * *
5. Amend section 52.229-6 by:
(a) Revising the date of the clause;
(b) Redesignating paragraph (c) as (c)(1); removing from the newly
designated paragraph (c)(1) ``States.'' and adding ``States, except as
provided in subparagraph (c)(2) of this clause.'' in its place;
(c) Adding a new paragraph (c)(2);
(d) Redesignating paragraph (d) as (d)(1); removing from the newly
designated paragraph (d)(1) ``The contract price shall'' and adding
``Except as provided in subparagraph (d)(2) of this clause, the
contract price shall'' in its place; and
(e) Adding a new paragraph (d)(2).
The revised and newly added text reads as follows:
52.229-6 Taxes-Foreign Fixed--Price Contracts.
* * * * *
Taxes-Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts (Date)
* * * * *
(c)(1) * * *
(2) Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C. 5000C may not be--
(i) Included in the contract price; nor
(ii) Reimbursed.
(d)(1) * * *
(2) The contract price may not be increased to offset taxes imposed
under 26 U.S.C. 5000c.
* * * * *
6. Amend section 52.229-7 by:
a. Revising the date of the clause;
b. Redesignating paragraph (b) as (b)(1); and
c. Adding a new paragraph (b)(2).
The revised and newly added text reads as follows:
52.229-7 Taxes-Foreign Fixed-Price Contract With Foreign Governments.
* * * * *
Taxes-Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts With Foreign Governments (Date)
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Taxes imposed under 26 U.S.C. 5000c may not be included in the
contract price.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-3905 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P