Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, Cape Cod National Seashore, 9852-9856 [2012-3950]
Download as PDF
9852
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, which applies
to regulations establishing,
disestablishing, or changing Regulated
Navigation Areas, safety zones or
security zones.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T11–472 to
read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
§ 165–T11–472 Safety Zone; 2012
Mavericks Invitational, Half Moon Bay, CA.
(a) Location. This safety zone is
established for the waters of Half Moon
Bay, California, in the vicinity of Pillar
Point bounded by a line connecting the
following coordinates in the order they
appear written in this section: 37°29′23″
N, 122°30′04″ W; 37°29′15″ N,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Feb 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
122°30′10″ W; 37°29′17″ N, 122°30′30″
W; 37°29′36″ N, 122°30′16″ W;
37°29′23″ N, 122°30′04″ W; 37°29′36″ N,
122°29′21″ W; 37°29′13″ N, 122°29′25″
W; 37°29′15″ N, 122°29′58″ W;
37°29′23″ N, 122°30′04″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Definitions. Patrol Commander
(PATCOM). As used in this section,
‘‘Patrol Commander’’ or ‘‘PATCOM’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer,
or a Federal, State, or local officer
designated by the Captain of the Port
San Francisco (COTP) to assist in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Enforcement period. This rule is
effective during the 2012 Maverick
Invitational, which will take place on a
day that presents favorable surf
conditions between 7 a.m. Monday
January 23, 2012 and 3 p.m. Saturday
March 31, 2012. The Coast Guard will
issue notice of the event to the public
as soon as practicable, and no later than
24 hours prior to the event via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in 33 CFR part 165, Subpart
C this title, the safety zone is closed to
all unauthorized vessel traffic, except as
may be permitted by the COTP or
PATCOM.
(2) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or PATCOM to obtain
permission. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or
PATCOM. Persons or vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zone on VHF–23A or through the 24hour Command Center telephone at
(415)–399–3547.
(4) The COTP, or PATCOM as the
designated representative of the COTP,
may control the movement of all vessels
operating on the navigable waters of
Half Moon Bay when the COTP has
determined that such orders are justified
in the interest of safety by reason of
weather, visibility, sea conditions,
temporary port congestion, and other
temporary hazardous circumstances.
When hailed or signaled by PATCOM,
the hailed vessel must come to an
immediate stop and comply with the
lawful directions issued. Failure to
comply with a lawful direction may
result in additional operating
restrictions, citation for failure to
comply, or both.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: January 23, 2012.
C.L. Stowe,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2012–3868 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024–AD88
Special Regulations; Areas of the
National Park System, Cape Cod
National Seashore
National Park Service, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service is
amending special regulations for Cape
Cod National Seashore that authorize
hunting to allow for a spring season
hunt for Eastern Wild Turkey. The Final
Rule implements the Record of Decision
for the Cape Cod National Seashore
Hunting Program Environmental Impact
Statement of August 2007.
DATES: This rule is effective March 22,
2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Thatcher, Acting Chief Ranger, 99
Marconi Site Road Wellfleet, MA 02667;
508–957–0735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Description of the Park Area
In 1961 Congress established Cape
Cod National Seashore (Seashore). In
establishing the Seashore, Congress
directed that the unique flora and fauna,
the physiographic conditions, and the
historic sites and structures of the area
be permanently preserved; authorized
the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary)
to provide for the public enjoyment and
understanding of the unique natural,
historic, and scientific features of the
Seashore be facilitated by establishing
trails, observation points, exhibits and
services for the public, and provided
that adaptable portions of the Seashore
may be managed for camping,
swimming, boating, sailing, hunting,
fishing, and other activities of similar
nature. Public Law 87–126, Sec. 7 (Aug.
7, 1961).
The Seashore comprises 43,608 acres
of shoreline; salt marshes; clear, deep,
freshwater kettle ponds; and uplands; as
well as a great diversity of species
supported by these habitats.
Lighthouses, a life-saving station, dune
shacks, modern and Cape Cod-style
houses, cultural landscapes, and wild
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
cranberry bogs provide a glimpse into
Cape Cod’s past and continuing life
ways. The Seashore offers six swimming
beaches, eleven self-guiding nature
trails, and a variety of picnic areas and
scenic overlooks.
Background
The 1961 legislation establishing the
Seashore authorized the Secretary,
acting through the National Park Service
(NPS), to permit hunting.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
The Secretary may permit hunting and
fishing, including shellfishing, on lands and
waters under his jurisdiction within the
seashore in such areas and under such
regulations as he may prescribe during open
seasons prescribed by applicable local, State
and Federal law. The Secretary shall consult
with officials of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts and any political subdivision
thereof who have jurisdiction of hunting and
fishing, including shellfishing, prior to the
issuance of any such regulations, and the
Secretary is authorized to enter into
cooperative arrangements with such officials
regarding such hunting and fishing,
including shellfishing, as he may deem
desirable. * * *
16 U.S.C. 459b–6(c).
The final rule increases hunting
opportunities by expanding the hunting
season to include a spring turkey hunt.
Hunting within the Seashore that is
authorized by NPS regulations is
conducted in accordance with
Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife
(MDFW) regulations. Currently
authorized hunting in the Seashore is
limited to deer, upland game, and
migratory waterfowl. Although the
Eastern Wild Turkey is managed as a
native upland game bird by the MDFW,
the current special regulation for
hunting within the Seashore prohibits
all hunting from March 1 through
August 31. This rule change is necessary
because the Massachusetts spring turkey
season generally takes place from late
April to mid or late May when hunting
is prohibited by the Seashore’s current
special regulation. Fall turkey hunting
could also be initiated if MDFW
established such a season in the Cape
Cod zone, but no rule change would be
needed for a fall turkey hunt since the
State does not conduct hunting before
September 1.
For many years, the Seashore
cooperated with the MDFW to release
ring-necked pheasants within the
Seashore to provide a pheasant hunt. In
2002, the Seashore was sued for failure
to follow the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) with respect to the
hunting program. In September 2003,
the U.S. District Court ordered the
Seashore to prepare a NEPA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Feb 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
environmental assessment of the
hunting program. The court also
enjoined the pheasant hunt until the
Seashore completed the NEPA
assessment.
National Environmental Policy Act
Process
As a result of the court order, the
Seashore initiated and completed a
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS), and Record of Decision (ROD),
on the Seashore’s hunting program. The
chosen alternative as documented by
the ROD, was Alternative B—Develop a
Modified Hunting Program.
Through Alternative B, the Seashore
seeks to increase hunting opportunities
for native upland game bird species by
establishing a turkey season generally
consistent with MDFW regulations and
making ancillary improvements to
upland game bird habitat. The
alternative phases out pheasant stocking
and hunting through adaptive
management actions aimed at improving
the availability of native upland game
bird species. Hunting areas will be
consolidated and clearly delineated and
educational outreach concerning
hunting will be expanded to hunting
and non-hunting users. The NPS and
MDFW will cooperatively monitor and
manage game and other species. The
FEIS and ROD may be reviewed at:
https://www.nps.gov/caco/parkmgmt/
planning.htm.
Summary of and Responses to Public
Comments
The NPS published a proposed rule
on March 22, 2011, and accepted public
comments through April 21, 2011.
Comments were accepted through the
mail, hand delivery, and through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. A total of eleven
comments were received during the
comment period. Ten comments
supported the establishment of the
spring turkey season within the
Seashore. One comment was not
responsive to the proposed rule, but
contained strong, general anti-hunting
sentiment.
Seven comments were received from
individuals. Of these, two came from
the same person. Two of the remaining
individual comments were very similar
in context and point, but did not
contain the name(s) of the person(s) that
sent them.
Three comments were received from
organizations: the Cranberry County
Longbeards Chapter of the National
Wild Turkey Federation; the Barnstable
County League of Sportsman’s Clubs,
Inc.; and the Bass River Rod and Gun
Club, Inc. One comment was from the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9853
agency that manages hunting in
Massachusetts, the MDFW.
Two individual comments expressed
general support for establishing a spring
turkey season at the Seashore that was
consistent with the MDFW program, but
also recognized that the Seashore season
and the State season were separately
managed. Two individual comments
supported the spring turkey season
based on reducing motor vehicle and
turkey conflicts on Route 6, a well
travelled State highway that runs
through the Seashore.
The comments received from the
three organizations supported
establishing a spring turkey season at
the Seashore. These comments also
suggested there should be:
• Consistency between the Seashore
and MDFW regulations,
• A youth turkey hunt similar to the
State youth hunt,
• Flexibility in the rule for the
Seashore to adjust to any changes
MDFW makes with the spring turkey
season, and
• No extra geographic restraints in the
Seashore spring turkey season that
might create a high hunter density.
The MDFW made similar suggestions
and also expressed concern about the
possible need for a hunter to have a
permit issued by the Seashore in
addition to their State hunting license
and turkey stamp.
Analysis and Response
The Seashore’s hunting FEIS
evaluated a turkey hunting season that
was consistent with the MDFW
regulations. The Seashore’s hunting
program has generally followed the
MDFW program, with additional
provisions or restrictions as necessary to
meet park objectives and NPS policies.
The Seashore regards MDFW as a key
expert agency with State and regionwide perspective that is important for
determining hunting seasons, bag limits,
and other elements of a sound hunting
program. Accordingly, management of
hunting at the Seashore will be
accomplished through close
coordination between the Seashore and
MDFW. The Seashore has adopted many
of the MDFW regulations without
additional restrictions, although the
ultimate responsibility for developing
and managing an appropriate hunting
program for the Seashore rests with the
NPS.
The existing special regulation
utilizes 36 CFR 1.5, Closures and public
use limits, to designate appropriate
locations where hunting is allowed and
to impose reasonable limits or
restrictions necessary to address park
specific issues such as resource
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
9854
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
protection, public safety and other
visitor use concerns. While the general
authority of § 1.5 remains available as
an alternative closure authority, the new
§ 7.67(f)(5) creates Seashore-specific
discretionary authority for the
Superintendent, consistent with the
public notice requirement of 36 CFR 1.7,
to require permits where appropriate
and to ensure that potential park
specific concerns or conflicts, such as
resource protection, visitor use, and
public safety, can be addressed should
they arise. Section 1.7 describes four
alternative methods of notifying the
public: Signs; maps; newspaper
publication; and electronic media,
brochures, or hand-outs. In addition, the
Superintendent must annually compile
all park closures and restrictions into a
document generally referred to as the
Superintendent’s Compendium, which
is available to the public on the
Seashore’s Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/caco. Although, closures
under the new § 7.67(f)(5)(ii) are
‘‘temporary’’ insofar as they must be
annually re-evaluated and renewed by
the Superintendent, they may be
renewed each year whenever
appropriate. In order to clarify this
point, and because the requirement for
annual review already exists in 36 CFR
1.7, NPS has deleted the word
‘‘temporarily’’ from § 7.67(f)(5)(ii) in this
final rule. This closure authority will
allow for such closures to remain
flexible in light of changes in visitor
use, public safety, wildlife resource
impacts, or other changed or
unanticipated conditions. Hunters are
urged to consult with the Seashore each
season to ascertain whether or not there
are any changes from the prior year.
For similar reasons, NPS has deleted
the reference to management activities
and objectives ‘‘such as those described
in the Cape Cod National Seashore
Hunting Program/Final Environmental
Impact Statement’’ from § 7.67(f)(5)(ii)
in this final rule. Although the FEIS will
continue to be an important guiding
document, the Seashore will gain
knowledge and experience each season
that will inform the ongoing
management process, and accordingly
some flexibility is necessary.
For example, when the FEIS (July
2007) and ROD (September 2007), were
completed, the MDFW had a two-week
spring turkey hunting season, starting at
the end of April and ending in early
May. The FEIS and ROD statements of
being ‘‘consistent with’’ the State season
and expanding the Seashore’s hunting
season to accommodate the State’s
spring turkey hunt was written in the
context of the two-week season. Since
that date, the State has expanded its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Feb 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
spring turkey season from two to four
weeks, ending in late May. Due to
possible user conflicts that may arise in
late May, the Seashore Superintendent,
using discretionary authority of the rule,
will set the closing date of the season.
The Seashore will strive to be consistent
with the MDFW’s turkey season dates to
avoid confusion. However, the
Superintendent will have the discretion
to adjust the Seashore’s opening and
closings dates based on factors such as
safety, use patterns, and the public
interest.
To authorize and manage hunting
activities compatible with their land
management concerns, other federal and
Commonwealth facilities within
Massachusetts, such as the
Massachusetts Military Reservation,
have different rules and different dates
than the dates/times established by the
MDFW. The Superintendent’s discretion
in this case would be similar to such
established practice. The public will be
notified of the spring turkey hunt
opening and closing dates and other
special conditions for the Seashore
hunting program, all of which will also
be published in the Superintendent’s
Compendium.
Affording the Seashore
Superintendent this discretion provides
the flexibility suggested by the three
organizations and the MDFW to allow
for accommodation of future changes in
the State’s program (provided the
changes fall within the scope of
discretion authorized by this regulation)
without further rulemaking. For
example, MDFW currently has a special
youth turkey hunt, which is allowed on
a specific day, as part of its spring
turkey season. The Seashore may
consider, and this rulemaking
accommodates, the possibility of
incorporating a youth turkey hunt into
the Seashore’s program in the future.
Consideration of the youth turkey hunt
component may be entertained after the
Seashore has implemented and
evaluated the regular spring turkey
hunt.
The ROD directed that: ‘‘[t]urkey
hunting within [the Seashore] will be a
controlled hunt requiring a permit,
limiting the number of hunters, and
likely managed through a lottery
system.’’ Accordingly, to control issues
such as hunter density for safety, this
rule provides that the Seashore will
manage the turkey hunt through
permits. A person seeking the turkey
hunting permit must present a driver’s
license, vehicle registration and
Massachusetts State Hunting license
with turkey stamp to ensure compliance
with MDFW turkey hunt legal
requirements and to verify the identity
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the applicant. Seashore hunters
should understand that some areas
where hunting has previously been
allowed might be closed to hunting
during the spring turkey season for
safety reasons.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
After review and analysis of the
public comments, NPS has:
• Deleted the word ‘‘temporarily’’ in
paragraph (f)(5)(ii), for the reasons
discussed in the previous section;
• Deleted the reference to activities
and objectives ‘‘such as those described
in the Cape Cod National Seashore
Hunting Program/Final Environmental
Impact Statement’’ in paragraph
(f)(5)(ii), for the reasons discussed in the
previous section; and
• Added the terms ‘‘limitations,
restrictions * * * or other hunting
related designations’’ to the public
notification requirements for closures in
paragraph (f)(6) to clarify that the
requirement applies to all such actions.
Compliance With Other Laws and
Executive Orders
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
This document is not a significant
rule and the Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of
$100 million or more on the economy.
It will not adversely affect in a material
way the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities.
(2) This rule will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency. This is an agency
specific rule.
(3) This rule does not alter the
budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user-fees, or loan programs or the rights
or obligations of their recipients.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal
or policy issues. The rule meets the
requirements of the NPS general
regulations at 36 CFR 2.2(b)(2).
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this document will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under
5 U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
The rule will benefit small businesses in
the local communities through the sale
of goods and services to turkey hunters.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions. The rule will not
impose restrictions on business in the
local communities in the form of fees,
record keeping or other requirements
that would increase costs.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications. A
takings implication assessment is not
required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13132, the rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary
impact statement. A Federalism
summary impact statement is not
required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically this rule:
(a) Meets the requirements of section
3(a) requiring all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13175 we have evaluated this rule and
determined that it has no potential
effects on federally recognized Indian
tribes.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Feb 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain any new
collection of information that requires
approval by OMB under the PRA of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). OMB has
approved the information collection
requirements associated with NPS
special use permits and has assigned
OMB control number 1024–0026
(expires 06/30/2013). An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
This rule implements a portion of a
major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment. The Seashore formally
initiated the NEPA process on June 21,
2004 by publishing in the Federal
Register a Notice of Intent (NOI) to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) on the Seashore
Hunting Program.
A series of public and agency scoping
meetings followed to solicit input on
hunting in the park from American
Indian tribes, Federal and State agencies
and local towns, the public, and
interested groups. Using the information
gathered during the scoping process, the
Seashore prepared a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (Draft
EIS) for public review and comment.
The comment period opened on April
21, 2006, with the Environmental
Protection Agency’s (EPA) publication
of a Notice of Availability (NOA) in the
Federal Register, and closed 60 days
later, on June 19, 2006.
Two public meetings were held
during the 60-day review period to
receive oral comment. The availability
of the Draft EIS and the dates and times
of the public meetings were also
publicized through a second NOA
published by the NPS in the Federal
Register on May 10, 2006, and through
press releases sent to local newspapers
and radio stations. Over 200 comments
were received on the Draft EIS. These
comments were used to improve the
Draft and produce the FEIS.
Completion of the FEIS was noticed
in the Federal Register by the DOI and
EPA on August 7 and August 10, 2007,
respectively. The ROD was signed on
September 18, 2007. The chosen
alternative was Alternative B—Develop
a Modified Hunting Program. The FEIS
and ROD may be reviewed at: https://
www.nps.gov/caco/parkmgmt/
planning.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9855
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this regulation
were Craig Thatcher, Acting Chief
Ranger, Cape Cod National Seashore;
Robin Lepore, Office of the Regional
Solicitor, Department of the Interior;
Russel J. Wilson, Chief Regulations and
Special Park Uses, National Park
Service; and, A.J. North, Regulations
Coordinator, National Park Service.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National Parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the National Park Service
amends 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
SYSTEM
1. The authority citation for part 7
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec.
7.96 also issued under 36 U.S.C. 501–511, DC
Code 10–137 (2001) and DC Code 50–2201
(2001).
■
2. Revise § 7.67(f) to read as follows:
§ 7.67
Cape Cod National Seashore.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Hunting. (1) Hunting is allowed at
times and locations designated by the
Superintendent as open to hunting.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, hunting is permitted in
accordance with § 2.2 of this chapter.
(3) Only deer, upland game (including
Eastern Wild Turkey), and migratory
waterfowl may be hunted.
(4) Hunting is prohibited from March
1st through August 31st each year,
except for the taking of Eastern Wild
Turkey as designated by the
Superintendent.
(5) The Superintendent may:
(i) Require permits and establish
conditions for hunting; and
(ii) Limit, restrict, or terminate
hunting access or activities after taking
into consideration public health and
safety, natural and cultural resource
protection, and other management
activities and objectives.
(6) The public will be notified of such
limitations, restrictions, closures, or
other hunting related designations
through one or more methods listed in
§ 1.7(a) of this chapter.
(7) Violating a closure, designation,
use or activity restriction or a term or
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
9856
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
condition of a permit is prohibited.
Violating a term or condition of a permit
may result in the suspension or
revocation of the permit by the
Superintendent.
Dated: February 10, 2012.
Rachel Jacobson,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2012–3950 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–WV–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 64
[Docket ID FEMA–2012–0003; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–8219]
Suspension of Community Eligibility
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule identifies
communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) that are scheduled for
suspension on the effective dates listed
within this rule because of
noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the
program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives
documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain
management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this
rule, the suspension will not occur and
a notice of this will be provided by
publication in the Federal Register on a
subsequent date.
DATES: Effective Dates: The effective
date of each community’s scheduled
suspension is the third date (‘‘Susp.’’)
listed in the third column of the
following tables.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended
on the suspension date or for further
information, contact David Stearrett,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2953.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP
enables property owners to purchase
Federal flood insurance that is not
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Feb 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
otherwise generally available from
private insurers. In return, communities
agree to adopt and administer local
floodplain management aimed at
protecting lives and new construction
from future flooding. Section 1315 of
the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022,
prohibits the sale of NFIP flood
insurance unless an appropriate public
body adopts adequate floodplain
management measures with effective
enforcement measures. The
communities listed in this document no
longer meet that statutory requirement
for compliance with program
regulations, 44 CFR part 59.
Accordingly, the communities will be
suspended on the effective date in the
third column. As of that date, flood
insurance will no longer be available in
the community. We recognize that some
of these communities may adopt and
submit the required documentation of
legally enforceable floodplain
management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual
suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue
their eligibility for the sale of insurance.
A notice withdrawing the suspension of
the communities will be published in
the Federal Register.
In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
identifies the Special Flood Hazard
Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
The date of the FIRM, if one has been
published, is indicated in the fourth
column of the table. No direct Federal
financial assistance (except assistance
pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act not in connection with a
flood) may be provided for construction
or acquisition of buildings in identified
SFHAs for communities not
participating in the NFIP and identified
for more than a year on FEMA’s initial
FIRM for the community as having
flood-prone areas (section 202(a) of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973,
42 U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This
prohibition against certain types of
Federal assistance becomes effective for
the communities listed on the date
shown in the last column. The
Administrator finds that notice and
public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)
are impracticable and unnecessary
because communities listed in this final
rule have been adequately notified.
Each community receives 6-month,
90-day, and 30-day notification letters
addressed to the Chief Executive Officer
stating that the community will be
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
suspended unless the required
floodplain management measures are
met prior to the effective suspension
date. Since these notifications were
made, this final rule may take effect
within less than 30 days.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This rule is categorically excluded from
the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
Environmental Considerations. No
environmental impact assessment has
been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
Administrator has determined that this
rule is exempt from the requirements of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act because
the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022,
prohibits flood insurance coverage
unless an appropriate public body
adopts adequate floodplain management
measures with effective enforcement
measures. The communities listed no
longer comply with the statutory
requirements, and after the effective
date, flood insurance will no longer be
available in the communities unless
remedial action takes place.
Regulatory Classification. This final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
under the criteria of section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993, Regulatory Planning and Review,
58 FR 51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This rule involves no policies that have
federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule meets the applicable
standards of Executive Order 12988.
Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule
does not involve any collection of
information for purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64
Flood insurance, Floodplains.
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is
amended as follows:
PART 64—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 64
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp.; p. 376.
§ 64.6
[Amended]
2. The tables published under the
authority of § 64.6 are amended as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\21FER1.SGM
21FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9852-9856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3950]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
RIN 1024-AD88
Special Regulations; Areas of the National Park System, Cape Cod
National Seashore
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service is amending special regulations for
Cape Cod National Seashore that authorize hunting to allow for a spring
season hunt for Eastern Wild Turkey. The Final Rule implements the
Record of Decision for the Cape Cod National Seashore Hunting Program
Environmental Impact Statement of August 2007.
DATES: This rule is effective March 22, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Thatcher, Acting Chief Ranger,
99 Marconi Site Road Wellfleet, MA 02667; 508-957-0735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description of the Park Area
In 1961 Congress established Cape Cod National Seashore (Seashore).
In establishing the Seashore, Congress directed that the unique flora
and fauna, the physiographic conditions, and the historic sites and
structures of the area be permanently preserved; authorized the
Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to provide for the public
enjoyment and understanding of the unique natural, historic, and
scientific features of the Seashore be facilitated by establishing
trails, observation points, exhibits and services for the public, and
provided that adaptable portions of the Seashore may be managed for
camping, swimming, boating, sailing, hunting, fishing, and other
activities of similar nature. Public Law 87-126, Sec. 7 (Aug. 7, 1961).
The Seashore comprises 43,608 acres of shoreline; salt marshes;
clear, deep, freshwater kettle ponds; and uplands; as well as a great
diversity of species supported by these habitats. Lighthouses, a life-
saving station, dune shacks, modern and Cape Cod-style houses, cultural
landscapes, and wild
[[Page 9853]]
cranberry bogs provide a glimpse into Cape Cod's past and continuing
life ways. The Seashore offers six swimming beaches, eleven self-
guiding nature trails, and a variety of picnic areas and scenic
overlooks.
Background
The 1961 legislation establishing the Seashore authorized the
Secretary, acting through the National Park Service (NPS), to permit
hunting.
The Secretary may permit hunting and fishing, including
shellfishing, on lands and waters under his jurisdiction within the
seashore in such areas and under such regulations as he may
prescribe during open seasons prescribed by applicable local, State
and Federal law. The Secretary shall consult with officials of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and any political subdivision thereof
who have jurisdiction of hunting and fishing, including
shellfishing, prior to the issuance of any such regulations, and the
Secretary is authorized to enter into cooperative arrangements with
such officials regarding such hunting and fishing, including
shellfishing, as he may deem desirable. * * *
16 U.S.C. 459b-6(c).
The final rule increases hunting opportunities by expanding the
hunting season to include a spring turkey hunt. Hunting within the
Seashore that is authorized by NPS regulations is conducted in
accordance with Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Fisheries
and Wildlife (MDFW) regulations. Currently authorized hunting in the
Seashore is limited to deer, upland game, and migratory waterfowl.
Although the Eastern Wild Turkey is managed as a native upland game
bird by the MDFW, the current special regulation for hunting within the
Seashore prohibits all hunting from March 1 through August 31. This
rule change is necessary because the Massachusetts spring turkey season
generally takes place from late April to mid or late May when hunting
is prohibited by the Seashore's current special regulation. Fall turkey
hunting could also be initiated if MDFW established such a season in
the Cape Cod zone, but no rule change would be needed for a fall turkey
hunt since the State does not conduct hunting before September 1.
For many years, the Seashore cooperated with the MDFW to release
ring-necked pheasants within the Seashore to provide a pheasant hunt.
In 2002, the Seashore was sued for failure to follow the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) with respect to the hunting program. In
September 2003, the U.S. District Court ordered the Seashore to prepare
a NEPA environmental assessment of the hunting program. The court also
enjoined the pheasant hunt until the Seashore completed the NEPA
assessment.
National Environmental Policy Act Process
As a result of the court order, the Seashore initiated and
completed a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), and Record of
Decision (ROD), on the Seashore's hunting program. The chosen
alternative as documented by the ROD, was Alternative B--Develop a
Modified Hunting Program.
Through Alternative B, the Seashore seeks to increase hunting
opportunities for native upland game bird species by establishing a
turkey season generally consistent with MDFW regulations and making
ancillary improvements to upland game bird habitat. The alternative
phases out pheasant stocking and hunting through adaptive management
actions aimed at improving the availability of native upland game bird
species. Hunting areas will be consolidated and clearly delineated and
educational outreach concerning hunting will be expanded to hunting and
non-hunting users. The NPS and MDFW will cooperatively monitor and
manage game and other species. The FEIS and ROD may be reviewed at:
https://www.nps.gov/caco/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Summary of and Responses to Public Comments
The NPS published a proposed rule on March 22, 2011, and accepted
public comments through April 21, 2011. Comments were accepted through
the mail, hand delivery, and through the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. A total of eleven comments were received
during the comment period. Ten comments supported the establishment of
the spring turkey season within the Seashore. One comment was not
responsive to the proposed rule, but contained strong, general anti-
hunting sentiment.
Seven comments were received from individuals. Of these, two came
from the same person. Two of the remaining individual comments were
very similar in context and point, but did not contain the name(s) of
the person(s) that sent them.
Three comments were received from organizations: the Cranberry
County Longbeards Chapter of the National Wild Turkey Federation; the
Barnstable County League of Sportsman's Clubs, Inc.; and the Bass River
Rod and Gun Club, Inc. One comment was from the agency that manages
hunting in Massachusetts, the MDFW.
Two individual comments expressed general support for establishing
a spring turkey season at the Seashore that was consistent with the
MDFW program, but also recognized that the Seashore season and the
State season were separately managed. Two individual comments supported
the spring turkey season based on reducing motor vehicle and turkey
conflicts on Route 6, a well travelled State highway that runs through
the Seashore.
The comments received from the three organizations supported
establishing a spring turkey season at the Seashore. These comments
also suggested there should be:
Consistency between the Seashore and MDFW regulations,
A youth turkey hunt similar to the State youth hunt,
Flexibility in the rule for the Seashore to adjust to any
changes MDFW makes with the spring turkey season, and
No extra geographic restraints in the Seashore spring
turkey season that might create a high hunter density.
The MDFW made similar suggestions and also expressed concern about
the possible need for a hunter to have a permit issued by the Seashore
in addition to their State hunting license and turkey stamp.
Analysis and Response
The Seashore's hunting FEIS evaluated a turkey hunting season that
was consistent with the MDFW regulations. The Seashore's hunting
program has generally followed the MDFW program, with additional
provisions or restrictions as necessary to meet park objectives and NPS
policies. The Seashore regards MDFW as a key expert agency with State
and region-wide perspective that is important for determining hunting
seasons, bag limits, and other elements of a sound hunting program.
Accordingly, management of hunting at the Seashore will be accomplished
through close coordination between the Seashore and MDFW. The Seashore
has adopted many of the MDFW regulations without additional
restrictions, although the ultimate responsibility for developing and
managing an appropriate hunting program for the Seashore rests with the
NPS.
The existing special regulation utilizes 36 CFR 1.5, Closures and
public use limits, to designate appropriate locations where hunting is
allowed and to impose reasonable limits or restrictions necessary to
address park specific issues such as resource
[[Page 9854]]
protection, public safety and other visitor use concerns. While the
general authority of Sec. 1.5 remains available as an alternative
closure authority, the new Sec. 7.67(f)(5) creates Seashore-specific
discretionary authority for the Superintendent, consistent with the
public notice requirement of 36 CFR 1.7, to require permits where
appropriate and to ensure that potential park specific concerns or
conflicts, such as resource protection, visitor use, and public safety,
can be addressed should they arise. Section 1.7 describes four
alternative methods of notifying the public: Signs; maps; newspaper
publication; and electronic media, brochures, or hand-outs. In
addition, the Superintendent must annually compile all park closures
and restrictions into a document generally referred to as the
Superintendent's Compendium, which is available to the public on the
Seashore's Web site at https://www.nps.gov/caco. Although, closures
under the new Sec. 7.67(f)(5)(ii) are ``temporary'' insofar as they
must be annually re-evaluated and renewed by the Superintendent, they
may be renewed each year whenever appropriate. In order to clarify this
point, and because the requirement for annual review already exists in
36 CFR 1.7, NPS has deleted the word ``temporarily'' from Sec.
7.67(f)(5)(ii) in this final rule. This closure authority will allow
for such closures to remain flexible in light of changes in visitor
use, public safety, wildlife resource impacts, or other changed or
unanticipated conditions. Hunters are urged to consult with the
Seashore each season to ascertain whether or not there are any changes
from the prior year.
For similar reasons, NPS has deleted the reference to management
activities and objectives ``such as those described in the Cape Cod
National Seashore Hunting Program/Final Environmental Impact
Statement'' from Sec. 7.67(f)(5)(ii) in this final rule. Although the
FEIS will continue to be an important guiding document, the Seashore
will gain knowledge and experience each season that will inform the
ongoing management process, and accordingly some flexibility is
necessary.
For example, when the FEIS (July 2007) and ROD (September 2007),
were completed, the MDFW had a two-week spring turkey hunting season,
starting at the end of April and ending in early May. The FEIS and ROD
statements of being ``consistent with'' the State season and expanding
the Seashore's hunting season to accommodate the State's spring turkey
hunt was written in the context of the two-week season. Since that
date, the State has expanded its spring turkey season from two to four
weeks, ending in late May. Due to possible user conflicts that may
arise in late May, the Seashore Superintendent, using discretionary
authority of the rule, will set the closing date of the season. The
Seashore will strive to be consistent with the MDFW's turkey season
dates to avoid confusion. However, the Superintendent will have the
discretion to adjust the Seashore's opening and closings dates based on
factors such as safety, use patterns, and the public interest.
To authorize and manage hunting activities compatible with their
land management concerns, other federal and Commonwealth facilities
within Massachusetts, such as the Massachusetts Military Reservation,
have different rules and different dates than the dates/times
established by the MDFW. The Superintendent's discretion in this case
would be similar to such established practice. The public will be
notified of the spring turkey hunt opening and closing dates and other
special conditions for the Seashore hunting program, all of which will
also be published in the Superintendent's Compendium.
Affording the Seashore Superintendent this discretion provides the
flexibility suggested by the three organizations and the MDFW to allow
for accommodation of future changes in the State's program (provided
the changes fall within the scope of discretion authorized by this
regulation) without further rulemaking. For example, MDFW currently has
a special youth turkey hunt, which is allowed on a specific day, as
part of its spring turkey season. The Seashore may consider, and this
rulemaking accommodates, the possibility of incorporating a youth
turkey hunt into the Seashore's program in the future. Consideration of
the youth turkey hunt component may be entertained after the Seashore
has implemented and evaluated the regular spring turkey hunt.
The ROD directed that: ``[t]urkey hunting within [the Seashore]
will be a controlled hunt requiring a permit, limiting the number of
hunters, and likely managed through a lottery system.'' Accordingly, to
control issues such as hunter density for safety, this rule provides
that the Seashore will manage the turkey hunt through permits. A person
seeking the turkey hunting permit must present a driver's license,
vehicle registration and Massachusetts State Hunting license with
turkey stamp to ensure compliance with MDFW turkey hunt legal
requirements and to verify the identity of the applicant. Seashore
hunters should understand that some areas where hunting has previously
been allowed might be closed to hunting during the spring turkey season
for safety reasons.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
After review and analysis of the public comments, NPS has:
Deleted the word ``temporarily'' in paragraph (f)(5)(ii),
for the reasons discussed in the previous section;
Deleted the reference to activities and objectives ``such
as those described in the Cape Cod National Seashore Hunting Program/
Final Environmental Impact Statement'' in paragraph (f)(5)(ii), for the
reasons discussed in the previous section; and
Added the terms ``limitations, restrictions * * * or other
hunting related designations'' to the public notification requirements
for closures in paragraph (f)(6) to clarify that the requirement
applies to all such actions.
Compliance With Other Laws and Executive Orders
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
This document is not a significant rule and the Office of
Management and Budget has not reviewed this rule under Executive Order
12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities.
(2) This rule will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. This is an
agency specific rule.
(3) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user-fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of
their recipients.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal or policy issues. The rule
meets the requirements of the NPS general regulations at 36 CFR
2.2(b)(2).
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The Department of the Interior certifies that this document will
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA.
This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more.
[[Page 9855]]
The rule will benefit small businesses in the local communities through
the sale of goods and services to turkey hunters.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. The rule will not impose restrictions
on business in the local communities in the form of fees, record
keeping or other requirements that would increase costs.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rule does not
have significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment
is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism summary impact statement. A Federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically this rule:
(a) Meets the requirements of section 3(a) requiring all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13175 we have evaluated this
rule and determined that it has no potential effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain any new collection of information that
requires approval by OMB under the PRA of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.). OMB has approved the information collection requirements
associated with NPS special use permits and has assigned OMB control
number 1024-0026 (expires 06/30/2013). An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
This rule implements a portion of a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. The
Seashore formally initiated the NEPA process on June 21, 2004 by
publishing in the Federal Register a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the Seashore Hunting
Program.
A series of public and agency scoping meetings followed to solicit
input on hunting in the park from American Indian tribes, Federal and
State agencies and local towns, the public, and interested groups.
Using the information gathered during the scoping process, the Seashore
prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS) for public
review and comment. The comment period opened on April 21, 2006, with
the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) publication of a Notice of
Availability (NOA) in the Federal Register, and closed 60 days later,
on June 19, 2006.
Two public meetings were held during the 60-day review period to
receive oral comment. The availability of the Draft EIS and the dates
and times of the public meetings were also publicized through a second
NOA published by the NPS in the Federal Register on May 10, 2006, and
through press releases sent to local newspapers and radio stations.
Over 200 comments were received on the Draft EIS. These comments were
used to improve the Draft and produce the FEIS.
Completion of the FEIS was noticed in the Federal Register by the
DOI and EPA on August 7 and August 10, 2007, respectively. The ROD was
signed on September 18, 2007. The chosen alternative was Alternative
B--Develop a Modified Hunting Program. The FEIS and ROD may be reviewed
at: https://www.nps.gov/caco/parkmgmt/planning.htm.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this regulation were Craig Thatcher, Acting
Chief Ranger, Cape Cod National Seashore; Robin Lepore, Office of the
Regional Solicitor, Department of the Interior; Russel J. Wilson, Chief
Regulations and Special Park Uses, National Park Service; and, A.J.
North, Regulations Coordinator, National Park Service.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Park Service
amends 36 CFR part 7 as follows:
PART 7--SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
0
1. The authority citation for part 7 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 9a, 462(k); Sec. 7.96 also issued
under 36 U.S.C. 501-511, DC Code 10-137 (2001) and DC Code 50-2201
(2001).
0
2. Revise Sec. 7.67(f) to read as follows:
Sec. 7.67 Cape Cod National Seashore.
* * * * *
(f) Hunting. (1) Hunting is allowed at times and locations
designated by the Superintendent as open to hunting.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, hunting is
permitted in accordance with Sec. 2.2 of this chapter.
(3) Only deer, upland game (including Eastern Wild Turkey), and
migratory waterfowl may be hunted.
(4) Hunting is prohibited from March 1st through August 31st each
year, except for the taking of Eastern Wild Turkey as designated by the
Superintendent.
(5) The Superintendent may:
(i) Require permits and establish conditions for hunting; and
(ii) Limit, restrict, or terminate hunting access or activities
after taking into consideration public health and safety, natural and
cultural resource protection, and other management activities and
objectives.
(6) The public will be notified of such limitations, restrictions,
closures, or other hunting related designations through one or more
methods listed in Sec. 1.7(a) of this chapter.
(7) Violating a closure, designation, use or activity restriction
or a term or
[[Page 9856]]
condition of a permit is prohibited. Violating a term or condition of a
permit may result in the suspension or revocation of the permit by the
Superintendent.
Dated: February 10, 2012.
Rachel Jacobson,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2012-3950 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-WV-P