Reporting of Specified Foreign Financial Assets; Correction, 9877-9878 [2012-3933]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Proposed Rules
last 21 NM of the airway; terminating
the route at the existing RUGBB fix,
shared with V–502. Ending the modified
V–508 at the RUGBB fix would provide
eastbound IFR aircraft with the ability to
continue to destinations further east or
northeast via transition from V–508 to
V–502.
VOR Federal airways are published in
paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order
7400.9V dated August 9, 2011, and
effective September 15, 2011, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The VOR Federal Airways listed in
this document would be subsequently
published in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1)
Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it proposes to modify VOR Federal
Airways in the vicinity of Olathe, KS.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Feb 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
9877
V–508 [Amended]
From Hill City, KS; Hays, KS; Salina, KS,
INT Salina 082° and Manhattan, KS, 207°
radials; Manhattan; INT Manhattan 078° and
Topeka, KS, 293° radials; Topeka; to INT
Topeka 112°(T)/107°(M) and Kansas City,
MO, 228°(T)/223°(M) radials.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 9,
2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations & ATC
Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2012–3820 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
§ 71.1
26 CFR Part 1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the FAA Order 7400.9V,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 9, 2011, and
effective September 15, 2011, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 6010(a)
airways.
*
*
*
Domestic VOR federal
*
*
*
*
*
V–12 [Amended]
From Gaviota, CA; San Marcus, CA;
Palmdale, CA; 38 miles, 6 miles wide,
Hector, CA; 12 miles, 38 miles, 85 MSL,
14 miles, 75 MSL, Needles, CA; 45 miles, 34
miles, 95 MSL, Drake, AZ; Winslow, AZ; 30
miles, 85 MSL, Zuni, NM; Albuquerque, NM;
Otto, NM; Anton Chico, NM; Tucumcari,
NM; Amarillo, TX; Mitbee, OK; Anthony, KS;
Wichita, KS; Emporia, KS; INT Emporia
063°(T)/055°(M) and Napoleon, MO, 242°(T)/
235°(M) radials; Napoleon; INT Napoleon
095° and Columbia, MO, 292° radials;
Columbia; Foristell, MO; Troy, IL; Bible
Grove, IL; Shelbyville, IN; Richmond, IN;
Dayton, OH; Appleton, OH; Newcomerstown,
OH; Allegheny, PA; Johnstown, PA;
Harrisburg, PA; INT Harrisburg 092° and
Pottstown, PA, 278° radials; to Pottstown.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00010
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
[REG–130302–10]
RIN 1545–BJ69
Reporting of Specified Foreign
Financial Assets; Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
*
V–10 [Amended]
From Pueblo, CO; 18 miles, 48 miles, 60
MSL, Lamar, CO; Garden City, KS; Dodge
City, KS; Hutchinson, KS; Emporia, KS; INT
Emporia 063°(T)/055°(M) and Napoleon, MO,
242°(T)/235°(M) radials; Napoleon;
Kirksville, MO; Burlington, IA; Bradford, IL;
to INT Bradford 058° and Joliet, IL, 287°
radials. From INT Chicago Heights, IL, 358°
and Gipper, MI, 271° radials; Gipper;
Litchfield, MI; INT Litchfield 101° and
Carleton, MI, 262° radials; Carleton; INT
Jefferson, OH, 279° and Youngstown, OH,
320° radials; Youngstown; INT Youngstown
116° and Revloc, PA, 300° radials; Revloc;
INT Revloc 107° and Lancaster, PA, 280°
radials; to Lancaster. The airspace within
Canada is excluded.
*
Internal Revenue Service
ACTION:
This document contains
corrections to a notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–130302–10), which
was published in the Federal Register
on Monday, December 19, 2011, relating
to the reporting of specified foreign
financial assets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph S. Henderson (202) 622–3880
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The notice of proposed rulemaking
that is the subject of these corrections
are under section 6038 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published on December 19, 2011,
(76 FR 78594), the notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–130302–10), contains
errors which may prove to be
misleading and are in need of
clarification.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM
21FEP1
9878
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 21, 2012 / Proposed Rules
PART 1—[CORRECTED]
Par. 2. Section 1.6038D–6 is amended
by revising paragraph (d)(3) to read as
follows:
§ 1.6038D–6
Specified domestic entities.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) * * * A trust described in section
7701(a)(30)(E) to the extent such trust or
any portion thereof is treated as owned
by one or more specified persons under
sections 671 through 678 and the
regulations issued under those sections.
*
*
*
*
*
Guy R. Traynor,
Federal Register Liaison, Legal Processing
Division, Publications and Regulations Br.,
Procedure and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012–3933 Filed 2–17–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 16
[CPCLO Order No. 003–2012]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
Department of Justice.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Elsewhere in the Federal
Register, the Department of Justice (DOJ
or Department) has published a notice
of a new Department-wide Privacy Act
system of records, Debt Collection
Enforcement System, JUSTICE/DOJ–
016. In this notice of proposed
rulemaking, the DOJ proposes to exempt
certain records in this system from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act in
order to avoid interference with the law
enforcement functions and
responsibilities of the DOJ. Public
comment is invited.
DATES: Comments must be received by
March 22, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments to
the Department of Justice, ATTN:
Privacy Analyst, Office of Privacy and
Civil Liberties, National Place Building,
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
1000, Washington, DC 20530, or
facsimile (202) 307–0693. To ensure
proper handling, please reference the
CPCLO Order number in your
correspondence. You may review an
electronic version of the proposed rule
at https://www.regulations.gov. You may
also submit a comment via the Internet
by emailing DOJPrivacyActProposed
Regulations@usdoj.gov or by using the
comment form for this regulation at
https://www.regulation.gov. Please
include the CPCLO Order number in the
subject box.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Feb 17, 2012
Jkt 226001
Please note that the Department is
requesting that electronic comments be
submitted before midnight Eastern
standard time on the day the comment
period closes because https://
www.regulations.gov terminates the
public’s ability to submit comments at
that time. Commenters in time zones
other than Eastern standard time may
want to consider this so that their
electronic comments are received. All
comments sent via regular or express
mail will be considered timely if
postmarked on the day the comment
period closes.
Posting of Public Comments: Please
note that all comments received are
considered part of the public record and
made available for public inspection
online at https://www.regulations.gov
and in the Department’s public docket.
Such information includes personally
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personally
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
comment but do not want it to be posted
online or made available in the public
docket, you must include the term
‘‘PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also place
all the personally identifying
information you do not want posted
online or made available in the public
docket in the first paragraph of your
comment and identify what information
you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment but do not want it to be posted
online or made available in the public
docket, you must include the term
‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment. If a comment has
so much confidential business
information that it cannot be effectively
redacted, all or part of that comment
may not be posted online or made
available in the public docket.
Personally identifying information
and confidential business information
identified and located as set forth above
will be redacted and the comment, in
redacted form, will be posted online and
placed in the Department’s public
docket file. Please note that the Freedom
of Information Act applies to all
comments received. If you wish to
inspect the agency’s public docket file
in person by appointment, please see
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Holley B. O’Brien, Director, Debt
Collection Management Staff, Justice
Management Division, Department of
Justice, at (202) 514–5343.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Notice section of today’s Federal
Register, the DOJ published a new
Department-wide Privacy Act system of
records, Debt Collection Enforcement
System, JUSTICE/DOJ–016, to reflect the
consolidation of the Department’s debt
collection enforcement systems, that
were previously maintained in various
individual DOJ components, into a
single, centralized system. This system
of records is maintained by the
Department of Justice to cover records
used by the Department’s components
or offices, and/or contract private
counsel retained by DOJ to perform
legal, financial and administrative
services associated with the collection
of debts due the United States,
including related negotiation,
settlement, litigation, and enforcement
efforts.
In this rulemaking, the DOJ proposes
to exempt certain records in this Privacy
Act system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act because
the system contains material compiled
for law enforcement purposes.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule relates to
individuals, as opposed to small
business entities. Pursuant to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, the
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), requires that
the DOJ consider the impact of
paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the
public. There are no current or new
information collection requirements
associated with this proposed rule. The
records that are contributed to the Debt
Collection Enforcement system would
be created in any event by law
enforcement entities and their sharing of
this information electronically will not
increase the paperwork burden on the
public.
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
certain regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments, and the
private sector. UMRA requires a written
E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM
21FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 21, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9877-9878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3933]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-130302-10]
RIN 1545-BJ69
Reporting of Specified Foreign Financial Assets; Correction
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to a notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG-130302-10), which was published in the Federal Register
on Monday, December 19, 2011, relating to the reporting of specified
foreign financial assets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph S. Henderson (202) 622-3880
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The notice of proposed rulemaking that is the subject of these
corrections are under section 6038 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published on December 19, 2011, (76 FR 78594), the notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG-130302-10), contains errors which may prove to
be misleading and are in need of clarification.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
[[Page 9878]]
PART 1--[CORRECTED]
Par. 2. Section 1.6038D-6 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(3)
to read as follows:
Sec. 1.6038D-6 Specified domestic entities.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) * * * A trust described in section 7701(a)(30)(E) to the extent
such trust or any portion thereof is treated as owned by one or more
specified persons under sections 671 through 678 and the regulations
issued under those sections.
* * * * *
Guy R. Traynor,
Federal Register Liaison, Legal Processing Division, Publications and
Regulations Br., Procedure and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-3933 Filed 2-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P