Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility of Contractors, 7579-7581 [2012-3307]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2012 / Notices
552(b). All such requests for
confidential treatment will be reviewed
on a case-by-case basis.
Abstract: The FR 2320 will be a
quarterly information collection of
parent only and consolidated financial
and organizational structure data of top
and lower tier SLHCs. The data was
previously collected on Schedule HC of
the TFR. Title III of the Dodd-Frank Act
transferred all former OTS authorities
(including rulemaking) related to SLHCs
to the Federal Reserve on July 21, 2011.
Consequently, the Federal Reserve
became responsible for the consolidated
supervision of SLHCs beginning July 21,
2011. The Federal Reserve will use the
data to evaluate a diversified holding
company and to determine whether an
SLHC is in compliance with applicable
laws and regulations. In addition, the
data collected will contribute to the
analyses of the overall financial
condition of SLHCs to ensure safe and
sound operations.
Current Actions: On November 10,
2011, the Federal Reserve published a
notice in the Federal Register (76 FR
70146) requesting public comment for
60 days on the implementation of the
Quarterly Savings and Loan Holding
Company Report (FR 2320). The
comment period for this notice expired
on January 9, 2012. The Federal Reserve
received three comment letters
addressing the proposed
implementation of the FR 2320: two
from law firms and one from a financial
services company.
Two commenters requested
clarification of the reporting criteria for
multi-tiered SLHCs. Also, these
commenters asked that the Federal
Reserve be flexible when determining
which SLHCs within a multi-tiered
organization would be required to file
the FR 2320. In response to the
comments, the Federal Reserve will
clarify the FR 2320 instructions to
indicate which SLHCs should file the
FR 2320. The FR 2320 will generally be
filed by the top-tier SLHC if that SLHC
is exempt 1 from filing the Federal
Reserve’s existing regulatory reports.
However, if a top-tier SLHC is not
required to file the FR 2320, then a
lower-tier SLHC must file FR 2320.
Such determination as to which SLHC
will be required to file the FR 2320 will
be made by the district Federal Reserve
Bank. In addition, lower-tier SLHCs may
voluntarily file the FR 2320 or may be
1 An exempt SLHC includes: (1) A grandfathered
unitary SLHC whose assets are primarily
commercial and whose thrifts make up less than 5
percent of its consolidated assets; and (2) a SLHC
whose assets are primarily insurance-related and
who does not otherwise submit financial reports
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Feb 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
required to file (in addition to the toptier SLHC) for safety and soundness
purposes at the discretion of the district
Federal Reserve Bank.
One commenter noted certain data
items that were given confidential
treatment by the OTS are no longer
afforded the same treatment in the FR
2320 and this may be of concern to
privately held institutions. After
considering these comments, the
Federal Reserve believes the data items
no longer held as confidential will not
cause competitive harm to any
institution, publicly or privately held
and notes there are several BHCs that
are privately held where similar
information is made publicly available.
However, as noted above, institutions
may request, in writing, confidential
treatment for any data item in the FR
2320 or for all data items in the report,
and confidential treatment will be
afforded if the institution is able to
establish that disclosure would cause
substantial competitive harm.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, February 7, 2012.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
7579
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than March 9, 2012.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King,
Community Affairs Officer) 90
Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55480–0291:
1. Western State Agency, Inc.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan and
Trust, Devils Lake, North Dakota; to
acquire an additional 14.44 percent, for
a total of 43.25 percent of the voting
shares of Western State Agency, Inc.,
Devils Lake, North Dakota, and thereby
indirectly acquire additional voting
shares of Western State Bank, Devils
Lake, North Dakota.
Dated: February 8, 2012.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012–3256 Filed 2–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
[FR Doc. 2012–3192 Filed 2–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
OFFICE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Debarment, Suspension, and
Ineligibility of Contractors
AGENCY:
Government Accountability
Office.
ACTION:
Policy statement.
On September 30, 2011, the
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) provided notice of its proposed
policy to adopt the policies and
procedures contained in the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) regarding
the debarment, suspension, and
ineligibility of government contractors.
Comments on GAO’s policy were due
on or before November 14, 2011. GAO
received two comments. Both comments
expressed support for GAO’s efforts to
adopt policies and procedures regarding
the debarment, suspension, and
ineligibility of government contractors.
Neither comment suggested any changes
to GAO’s policy statement. GAO is
adopting, with minor changes, the
policy statement published in the
Federal Register on September 30, as set
forth below.
As a legislative branch agency, GAO
is not subject to the requirements of the
FAR. However, it is GAO’s general
policy to follow the FAR, as appropriate
and applicable. Mandatory application
of the FAR is not to be inferred from
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7580
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2012 / Notices
GAO’s adoption of this policy. Further,
GAO’s procurement rules are not
contained in the Code of Federal
Regulations, but instead are contained
in an internal GAO document referred
to as ‘‘Government Accountability
Office Procurement Guidelines’’
(hereinafter, GAO’s Procurement Order).
As such, GAO’s policy regarding
debarment and suspension will be
added as a chapter to GAO’s
Procurement Order.
DATES: This policy is effective February
13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Questions concerning this
policy can be addressed to Government
Accountability Office, Office of the
General Counsel, Attn: Legal Services,
Room 7838, 441 G Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20548.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
A. Bielec, Assistant General Counsel,
202–512–2846 or email,
bielecj@gao.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
GAO’s policy, GAO will follow FAR
Subpart 9.4. GAO’s Procurement Order,
GAO Order 0625.1, states that it is
GAO’s policy to follow the FAR and
GAO has long-maintained procedures,
consistent with FAR Subpart 9.4, that
ensure that it contracts only with those
entities and individuals (hereinafter,
contractors) who are responsible.
However, GAO’s Procurement Order
does not explicitly reference the
debarment and suspension procedures
contained in FAR Subpart 9.4. To make
clear that FAR Subpart 9.4 applies, GAO
will amend its Procurement Order to
formally and explicitly adopt FAR
Subpart 9.4.
Except as provided in FAR Subpart
9.4, GAO will not solicit offers from,
award contracts to, or consent to
subcontracts with, contractors who are
listed on the Excluded Parties List
System (EPLS), which is maintained by
the General Services Administration.
Further, if GAO debars, proposes for
debarment, or suspends a contractor,
GAO will, consistent with FAR Subpart
9.4, list that contractor in the EPLS.
Given that GAO is a legislative branch
agency, the listing of a contractor in the
EPLS by GAO will have mandatory
effect only as to GAO. Consistent with
FAR 9.405–1, GAO may continue an
existing contract with a contractor who
is later debarred, proposed for
debarment, or suspended.
Consistent with the definitions of
‘‘debarring official’’ and ‘‘suspending
official’’ contained at FAR 9.403, the
Comptroller General, as the head of
GAO, will serve as the debarring official
and suspending official (hereinafter,
debarment/suspension official). The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Feb 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
Comptroller General may designate
another GAO official to serve as the
debarment/suspension official. The
Comptroller General will also be
responsible for deciding whether to
solicit offers from, award contracts to, or
consent to subcontracts with contractors
who have been debarred, suspended, or
proposed for debarment, and whether to
terminate a current contract or
subcontract in existence at the time the
contractor was debarred, suspended, or
proposed for debarment.
GAO’s Acquisition Management office
(AM), which is responsible for the
majority of GAO’s contracting activities,
will be the GAO unit with primary
responsibility for investigating and
referring potential debarment and
suspension actions to the debarment/
suspension official for his or her
consideration. GAO’s procurement
activities are largely centralized in AM,
which is staffed by contracting officers
and other acquisition professionals. As
such, AM staff has the required
technical knowledge to handle
debarment and suspension referrals and
is in the best position to learn of matters
that may warrant debarment and/or
suspension. Moreover, AM is the first
point of contact for Contracting Officers’
Representatives, who have direct
knowledge of any problems with
contractor performance. Thus,
individuals—including GAO employees
and members of the public—who
believe that there may be grounds to
debar or suspend a contractor should
contact AM and provide them with all
relevant information. Whenever AM
learns of information that indicates
there may be grounds for debarring or
suspending a contractor, AM will gather
appropriate information and refer the
matter to the debarment/suspension
official. All such referrals will include
a recommendation by the Director of
AM as to a proposed course of action.
Likewise, AM will have responsibility
for recommending to the Comptroller
General whether or not to continue
current contracts with, solicit offers
from, award contracts to, or consent to
subcontracts with a contractor who is
debarred, suspended, or proposed for
debarment.
Given its central role in GAO’s
procurement process, AM, in
consultation with GAO’s Office of
General Counsel, will also be
responsible for establishing written
procedures that address the key aspects
of GAO’s debarment/suspension
program.
Accordingly, the Government
Accountability Office has adopted the
following policy and will incorporate it
into GAO’s Procurement Order:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
GAO will follow the policies and
procedures contained at FAR Subpart
9.4—Debarment, Suspension, and
Ineligibility. GAO will not solicit offers
from, award contracts to, or consent to
subcontracts with contractors who are
listed on the Excluded Parties List
System (EPLS), except as otherwise
provided for in FAR Subpart 9.4. GAO
will report to the EPLS any contractor
GAO debars, suspends, or proposes for
debarment. Such action will have
mandatory application only to GAO.
Notwithstanding the debarment,
suspension, or proposed debarment of a
contractor, GAO may continue contracts
or subcontracts in existence at the time
the contractor was debarred, suspended,
or proposed for debarment, unless the
Comptroller General (CG) directs
otherwise.
The CG or a designee will serve as the
debarring official and suspending
official (debarment/suspension official).
The CG will also decide whether to
solicit offers from, award contracts to, or
consent to subcontracts with contractors
who have been debarred, suspended, or
proposed for debarment and whether to
terminate a current contract or
subcontract in existence at the time the
contractor was debarred, suspended, or
proposed for debarment.
Acquisition Management (AM) will
have primary responsibility for
investigating and referring potential
debarment/suspension actions to the
debarment/suspension official for
consideration. As such, any person who
believes that there may be grounds to
debar or suspend a person or entity from
contracting with GAO should contact
AM and provide them with all relevant
information. AM will also have
responsibility for recommending to the
CG whether or not to continue current
contracts with, solicit offers from, award
contracts to, or consent to subcontracts
with a contractor who is debarred,
suspended, or proposed for debarment.
In consultation with the Office of
General Counsel, AM will establish and
maintain written procedures for:
(1) The prompt reporting,
investigation, and referral to the
debarment/suspension official of
matters appropriate for that official’s
consideration. All debarment/
suspension referrals shall include a
recommendation by the Director of AM
as to a proposed course of action;
(2) The debarment decisionmaking
process, which shall afford the
contractor (and any specifically named
affiliates) an opportunity to submit, in
person, in writing, or through a
representative, information and
argument in opposition to the proposed
debarment;
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
7581
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 29 / Monday, February 13, 2012 / Notices
(3) The suspension decisionmaking
process, which shall afford the
contractor (and any specifically named
affiliates) an opportunity, following the
imposition of suspension, to submit, in
person, in writing, or through a
representative, information and
argument in opposition to the
suspension;
(4) Recommending to the CG whether
or not to solicit offers from, award
contracts to, or consent to subcontracts
with a contractor who is debarred,
suspended, or proposed for debarment;
and
(5) Recommending to the CG whether
or not to continue current contracts with
a contractor or subcontractor who is
debarred, suspended, or proposed for
debarment.
OGC will review for legal sufficiency:
(1) Referrals by AM to the debarment/
suspension official;
(2) Recommendations by AM to the
CG that GAO solicit offers from, award
contracts to, or consent to subcontracts
with a contractor who is debarred,
suspended, or proposed for debarment;
(3) Recommendations by AM to the
CG to terminate a current contract
because a contractor or subcontractor
was subsequently debarred, suspended,
or proposed for debarment; and
(4) Notices of proposed debarment,
notices of suspension, or any other
communication to a contractor
To obtain copies of the supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed paperwork collections
referenced above, email your request,
including your address, phone number,
OMB number, and OS document
identifier, to
Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call
the Reports Clearance Office on (202)
690–6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collections must be directed
to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer
at the above email address within 60days.
Proposed Project: Survey of Primary
Care Physicians on Oral Health for the
Office on Women’s Health (OWH), U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) (New)—OMB No. 0990–
NEW.
Abstract: The Office on Women’s
Health (OWH) at the Department of
Health and Human Services is
requesting OMB approval to conduct a
new, one time survey of primary care
physicians regarding oral health. This
survey will provide the agency with
information on oral health knowledge,
attitudes, and professional experience
among practicing physicians throughout
the U.S. The study will explore
physicians’ level of understanding of
oral disease and what constitutes health
for the oral cavity, oral health training
and support needs, current practices
and barriers to further involvement.
OWH is requesting two years of OMB
approval to enable sampling, screening,
and survey implementation.
regarding that contractor’s potential or
actual suspension or debarment.
Lynn H. Gibson,
General Counsel, U.S. Government
Accountability Office.
[FR Doc. 2012–3307 Filed 2–10–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier: OS–0990–New]
Agency Information Collection
Request; 60-Day Public Comment
Request
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Secretary (OS), Department
of Health and Human Services, is
publishing the following summary of a
proposed information collection request
for public comment. Interested persons
are invited to send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including any of the following subjects:
(1) The necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
AGENCY:
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Number of
respondents
Number
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total burden
(in hours)
Type of respondent
Form name
Medical Secretary .............................
Physician ...........................................
Screener ...........................................
Survey ..............................................
1,300
600
1
1
5/60
30/60
108
300
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
........................
........................
........................
408
Keith A. Tucker,
Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction
Act Reports Clearance Officer.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[FR Doc. 2012–3210 Filed 2–10–12; 8:45 am]
Food and Drug Administration
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4150–33–P
[Docket No. FDA–2011–P–0292]
Determination That KAPVAY
(Clonidine Hydrochloride) ExtendedRelease Tablets, 0.2 Milligram, Was
Not Withdrawn From Sale for Reasons
of Safety or Effectiveness
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Feb 10, 2012
Jkt 226001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
that KAPVAY (clonidine hydrochloride)
Extended-Release Tablets, 0.2 milligram
(mg), was not withdrawn from sale for
reasons of safety or effectiveness. This
determination will allow FDA to
approve abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs) for clonidine
hydrochloride extended-release tablets,
0.2 mg, if all other requirements are met.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7579-7581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3307]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility of Contractors
AGENCY: Government Accountability Office.
ACTION: Policy statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On September 30, 2011, the Government Accountability Office
(GAO) provided notice of its proposed policy to adopt the policies and
procedures contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
regarding the debarment, suspension, and ineligibility of government
contractors. Comments on GAO's policy were due on or before November
14, 2011. GAO received two comments. Both comments expressed support
for GAO's efforts to adopt policies and procedures regarding the
debarment, suspension, and ineligibility of government contractors.
Neither comment suggested any changes to GAO's policy statement. GAO is
adopting, with minor changes, the policy statement published in the
Federal Register on September 30, as set forth below.
As a legislative branch agency, GAO is not subject to the
requirements of the FAR. However, it is GAO's general policy to follow
the FAR, as appropriate and applicable. Mandatory application of the
FAR is not to be inferred from
[[Page 7580]]
GAO's adoption of this policy. Further, GAO's procurement rules are not
contained in the Code of Federal Regulations, but instead are contained
in an internal GAO document referred to as ``Government Accountability
Office Procurement Guidelines'' (hereinafter, GAO's Procurement Order).
As such, GAO's policy regarding debarment and suspension will be added
as a chapter to GAO's Procurement Order.
DATES: This policy is effective February 13, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Questions concerning this policy can be addressed to
Government Accountability Office, Office of the General Counsel, Attn:
Legal Services, Room 7838, 441 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20548.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John A. Bielec, Assistant General
Counsel, 202-512-2846 or email, bielecj@gao.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under GAO's policy, GAO will follow FAR
Subpart 9.4. GAO's Procurement Order, GAO Order 0625.1, states that it
is GAO's policy to follow the FAR and GAO has long-maintained
procedures, consistent with FAR Subpart 9.4, that ensure that it
contracts only with those entities and individuals (hereinafter,
contractors) who are responsible. However, GAO's Procurement Order does
not explicitly reference the debarment and suspension procedures
contained in FAR Subpart 9.4. To make clear that FAR Subpart 9.4
applies, GAO will amend its Procurement Order to formally and
explicitly adopt FAR Subpart 9.4.
Except as provided in FAR Subpart 9.4, GAO will not solicit offers
from, award contracts to, or consent to subcontracts with, contractors
who are listed on the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), which is
maintained by the General Services Administration. Further, if GAO
debars, proposes for debarment, or suspends a contractor, GAO will,
consistent with FAR Subpart 9.4, list that contractor in the EPLS.
Given that GAO is a legislative branch agency, the listing of a
contractor in the EPLS by GAO will have mandatory effect only as to
GAO. Consistent with FAR 9.405-1, GAO may continue an existing contract
with a contractor who is later debarred, proposed for debarment, or
suspended.
Consistent with the definitions of ``debarring official'' and
``suspending official'' contained at FAR 9.403, the Comptroller
General, as the head of GAO, will serve as the debarring official and
suspending official (hereinafter, debarment/suspension official). The
Comptroller General may designate another GAO official to serve as the
debarment/suspension official. The Comptroller General will also be
responsible for deciding whether to solicit offers from, award
contracts to, or consent to subcontracts with contractors who have been
debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment, and whether to
terminate a current contract or subcontract in existence at the time
the contractor was debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment.
GAO's Acquisition Management office (AM), which is responsible for
the majority of GAO's contracting activities, will be the GAO unit with
primary responsibility for investigating and referring potential
debarment and suspension actions to the debarment/suspension official
for his or her consideration. GAO's procurement activities are largely
centralized in AM, which is staffed by contracting officers and other
acquisition professionals. As such, AM staff has the required technical
knowledge to handle debarment and suspension referrals and is in the
best position to learn of matters that may warrant debarment and/or
suspension. Moreover, AM is the first point of contact for Contracting
Officers' Representatives, who have direct knowledge of any problems
with contractor performance. Thus, individuals--including GAO employees
and members of the public--who believe that there may be grounds to
debar or suspend a contractor should contact AM and provide them with
all relevant information. Whenever AM learns of information that
indicates there may be grounds for debarring or suspending a
contractor, AM will gather appropriate information and refer the matter
to the debarment/suspension official. All such referrals will include a
recommendation by the Director of AM as to a proposed course of action.
Likewise, AM will have responsibility for recommending to the
Comptroller General whether or not to continue current contracts with,
solicit offers from, award contracts to, or consent to subcontracts
with a contractor who is debarred, suspended, or proposed for
debarment.
Given its central role in GAO's procurement process, AM, in
consultation with GAO's Office of General Counsel, will also be
responsible for establishing written procedures that address the key
aspects of GAO's debarment/suspension program.
Accordingly, the Government Accountability Office has adopted the
following policy and will incorporate it into GAO's Procurement Order:
GAO will follow the policies and procedures contained at FAR
Subpart 9.4--Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility. GAO will not
solicit offers from, award contracts to, or consent to subcontracts
with contractors who are listed on the Excluded Parties List System
(EPLS), except as otherwise provided for in FAR Subpart 9.4. GAO will
report to the EPLS any contractor GAO debars, suspends, or proposes for
debarment. Such action will have mandatory application only to GAO.
Notwithstanding the debarment, suspension, or proposed debarment of a
contractor, GAO may continue contracts or subcontracts in existence at
the time the contractor was debarred, suspended, or proposed for
debarment, unless the Comptroller General (CG) directs otherwise.
The CG or a designee will serve as the debarring official and
suspending official (debarment/suspension official). The CG will also
decide whether to solicit offers from, award contracts to, or consent
to subcontracts with contractors who have been debarred, suspended, or
proposed for debarment and whether to terminate a current contract or
subcontract in existence at the time the contractor was debarred,
suspended, or proposed for debarment.
Acquisition Management (AM) will have primary responsibility for
investigating and referring potential debarment/suspension actions to
the debarment/suspension official for consideration. As such, any
person who believes that there may be grounds to debar or suspend a
person or entity from contracting with GAO should contact AM and
provide them with all relevant information. AM will also have
responsibility for recommending to the CG whether or not to continue
current contracts with, solicit offers from, award contracts to, or
consent to subcontracts with a contractor who is debarred, suspended,
or proposed for debarment.
In consultation with the Office of General Counsel, AM will
establish and maintain written procedures for:
(1) The prompt reporting, investigation, and referral to the
debarment/suspension official of matters appropriate for that
official's consideration. All debarment/suspension referrals shall
include a recommendation by the Director of AM as to a proposed course
of action;
(2) The debarment decisionmaking process, which shall afford the
contractor (and any specifically named affiliates) an opportunity to
submit, in person, in writing, or through a representative, information
and argument in opposition to the proposed debarment;
[[Page 7581]]
(3) The suspension decisionmaking process, which shall afford the
contractor (and any specifically named affiliates) an opportunity,
following the imposition of suspension, to submit, in person, in
writing, or through a representative, information and argument in
opposition to the suspension;
(4) Recommending to the CG whether or not to solicit offers from,
award contracts to, or consent to subcontracts with a contractor who is
debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment; and
(5) Recommending to the CG whether or not to continue current
contracts with a contractor or subcontractor who is debarred,
suspended, or proposed for debarment.
OGC will review for legal sufficiency:
(1) Referrals by AM to the debarment/suspension official;
(2) Recommendations by AM to the CG that GAO solicit offers from,
award contracts to, or consent to subcontracts with a contractor who is
debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment;
(3) Recommendations by AM to the CG to terminate a current contract
because a contractor or subcontractor was subsequently debarred,
suspended, or proposed for debarment; and
(4) Notices of proposed debarment, notices of suspension, or any
other communication to a contractor regarding that contractor's
potential or actual suspension or debarment.
Lynn H. Gibson,
General Counsel, U.S. Government Accountability Office.
[FR Doc. 2012-3307 Filed 2-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
