Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH Helicopters, 7005-7007 [2012-3187]
Download as PDF
7005
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 77, No. 28
Friday, February 10, 2012
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0101; Directorate
Identifier 2010–SW–042–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
Deutschland GMBH Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH (ECD)
Model MBB–BK 117 C–1 and C–2
helicopters. This proposed AD would
require installing a placard that
corresponds to the maximum
permissible flight altitude, amending
the Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) to
revise the maximum permissible
operating altitude, and inserting revised
performance charts into the RFM. The
proposed AD would also require a
repetitive maintenance ‘‘MAX N1
CHECK’’ to determine the appropriate
maximum altitudes. The AD would also
require, if the engine or a fuel control
unit (FCU) or module 2 or 3 is replaced,
repeating the maintenance ‘‘MAX N1
CHECK.’’ Finally, the proposed AD
specifies that modifying both engines
would provide terminating action for
the proposed AD requirements. This
proposed AD is prompted by the failure
of a ‘‘few’’ engines to reach the specified
one-engine-inoperative (OEI) rating at
altitudes above 10,000 feet. The
proposed actions are intended to
prevent flights at altitudes where the
full OEI engine power cannot be
reached and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter if an OEI operation is
required.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:17 Feb 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may
examine the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov or in
person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the economic evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations Office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, Texas 75053–4005;
telephone (800) 232–0323; fax (972)
641–3710; or at https://www.eurocopter.
com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed
Cuevas, Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety
Management Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222–5110; email
ed.cuevas@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued AD No.: 2008–0061,
dated March 27, 2008, to correct an
unsafe condition for ECD Model MBB–
BK 117 C–1 and C–2 helicopters. EASA
states that during testing at maximum
certification altitude, a few helicopters
could not reach the specified OEI power
threshold. The cause was identified as
an engine acceleration limitation due to
a lower delivered fuel flow than the
engine fuel flow demand needed to
achieve the OEI rating at high altitude.
They state that this condition could
occur at altitudes exceeding 10,000 feet
depending on the engine and FCU
characteristics.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of
these same type designs.
Related Service Information
ECD has issued Alert Service Bulletin
(ASB) No. ASB–MBB–BK117–60–121,
Revision 4, (ASB121) for Model MBB–
BK 117 C–1 helicopters and ASB MBB
BK117 C–2–71A–003, Revision 3
(ASB003), for Model MBB–BK 117 C–2
helicopters. Both ASBs are dated
December 11, 2007, and apply to
Turbomeca Arriel 1E2 engines. Both
ASBs specify a ‘‘MAX N1 CHECK’’ for
helicopters with FCUs that have not
been modified by Turbomeca
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
7006
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
modification TU 358, for takeoffs,
landings, and hovering in-ground effect
(IGE) or hovering out-of-ground effect
(OGE) higher than 10,000 feet or flight
above 13,000 feet. The ASBs specify
limiting the maximum permissible flight
altitude if the OEI rating cannot be
achieved. The ASBs also specify the
measures are no longer necessary when
you modify both engines (Modification
TU 358). EASA classified these ASBs as
mandatory and issued AD No.: 2008–
0061, dated March 27, 2008, to ensure
the continued airworthiness of these
helicopters.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
compliance with specified portions of
the manufacturer’s service bulletin
including installing a placard that
corresponds to the maximum
permissible flight altitude, amending
the RFM to revise the maximum
permissible operating altitude for both
the MBB–BK 117 C–1 and C–2
helicopters, and inserting revised
performance charts into the RFM for the
C–1 model. This proposed AD would
also require maintenance ‘‘MAX N1
CHECKs’’ to determine the modified
maximum operational altitudes. This
proposal would also require, if the
engine or an FCU or module 2 or 3 is
replaced, repeating the maintenance
‘‘MAX N1 CHECK.’’ Finally, this
proposal specifies that modifying both
engines with Turbomeca Modification
TU 358 is terminating action for the
requirements of this proposed AD. After
the modification of both engines, you
may remove the placards and flight
manual revisions required by this AD.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
We do not reference the effective date
stated in the EASA AD because it has
passed. We have modified the initial
placard wording to make it clear that
before performing the topping check,
the ‘‘operating altitude’’ for takeoff,
landing, and hovering is a pressure
altitude (PA) of 10,000 feet, but flight up
to a maximum 13,000 feet is permitted
as long as the helicopter stays at an
airspeed above effective translational
lift. After the topping check is
performed, the ‘‘operating altitude’’
limitation refers to all modes of flight.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 108 helicopters of U.S.
Registry.
We estimate that operators may incur
the following costs in order to comply
with this AD. It would take about 1
work-hour per helicopter to affix a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:17 Feb 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
placard and insert the RFM pages at an
average labor rate of $85 per work-hour.
We estimate 54 maintenance flight
checks for higher altitude operators
would be required at $1,000 each. There
are no parts costs. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost
impact of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $63,180.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new Airworthiness
Directive (AD):
Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH: Docket No.
FAA–2012–0101; Directorate Identifier
2010–SW–042–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Eurocopter Deutschland
GMBH (ECD) Model MBB–BK 117 C–1 and
C–2 helicopters with a Turbomeca Arriel 1E2
engine installed, which has a Fuel Control
Unit (FCU) that has not been modified with
Turbomeca Modification TU 358, certificated
in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
failure of engines to reach the specified oneengine-inoperative (OEI) rating at altitudes
above 10,000 feet. This condition could
result in high altitude operations when full
OEI engine power is not available and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter
if an OEI operation is required.
(c) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance.
(d) Required Actions
(1) For Model MBB–BK117 C–1
helicopters:
(i) Before any flight operation at or above
a pressure altitude (PA) of 10,000 feet, unless
accomplished previously:
(A) Affix a placard to the instrument panel
in plain view of the pilot(s), which states:
‘‘Maximum altitude for takeoff, landing, and
hovering is 10,000 ft PA. Maximum operating
altitude above effective translational lift is
13,000 ft PA,’’ or comply with paragraph
(1)(iii) of this AD. The term ‘‘hovering’’ as
used in this placard includes both in-ground
effect (IGE) and out-of-ground effect (OGE)
hovering.
(B) Revise the Altitude Limitations section
of the Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM), in
accordance with paragraph 2.9 on pages 9
and 10; paragraph B.2.1. on page 15; and
paragraph C.2.3.2. on page 16 of Eurocopter
Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB–MBB–
BK117–60–121, Revision 4, dated December
11, 2007 (ASB121).
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2012 / Proposed Rules
(C) Attach each revised page 11–1–7
(ASB121, page 11) through 11–1–10
(ASB121, page 14) to the unrevised samenumbered page in the Performance section of
the RFM.
(ii) Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS),
unless accomplished previously:
(A) Revise the RFM as required by
paragraph (1)(i)(B) and (1)(i)(C) of this AD;
and
(B) Affix the placard as required by
paragraph (1)(i)(A) of this AD or comply with
paragraph (1)(iii) of this AD.
(iii) At intervals not to exceed 600 hours
TIS:
(A) Before operating between a 16,000 ft
PA and 18,000 ft PA, perform the ‘‘MAX N1
CHECK’’ by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1.1., of ASB121.
If the OEI rating is not reached, either affix
a placard as required by paragraph (1)(i)(A)
or comply with paragraph (1)(iii)(B) or
(1)(iii)(C) of this AD.
(B) Before operating between 13,000 ft PA
and 16,000 ft PA, perform the ‘‘MAX N1
CHECK’’ by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1.4., of ASB121.
(1) If the OEI rating is reached, affix a
placard to the instrument panel in plain view
of the pilot(s), which states: ‘‘Maximum
operating altitude is 16,000 ft PA.’’
(2) If the OEI rating is not reached, either
affix a placard as required by paragraph
(1)(i)(A) of this AD or comply with paragraph
(1)(iii)(C) of this AD.
(C) Before operating between 10,000 ft PA
and 13,000 ft PA, perform the ‘‘MAX N1
CHECK’’ by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1.7., of ASB121.
(1) If the OEI rating is reached, affix a
placard to the instrument panel in plain view
of the pilot(s), which states: ‘‘Maximum
operating altitude is 13,000 ft PA.’’
(2) If the OEI rating is not reached, affix a
placard as required by paragraph (1)(i)(A) of
this AD.
(2) For Model MBB–BK 117 C–2
helicopters:
(i) Before any flight operation at or above
a PA of 10,000 feet, unless accomplished
previously:
(A) Affix a placard to the instrument panel
in plain view of the pilot(s), which states:
‘‘Maximum altitude for takeoff, landing, and
hovering is 10,000 ft PA. Maximum operating
altitude above effective translational lift is
13,000 ft PA,’’ or comply with paragraph
(2)(iii) of this AD. The term ‘‘hovering’’ as
used in this placard includes both IGE and
OGE hovering.
(B) Revise the Altitude Limitations section
of the RFM in accordance with paragraph
A.2.3. on page 10 and paragraph 2.8. on page
11 of Eurocopter ASB No. MBB BK117 C–2–
71A–003, Revision 3, dated December 11,
2007 (ASB003).
(ii) Within 50 hours TIS, unless
accomplished previously:
(A) Revise the RFM as required by
paragraph (2)(i)(B) of this AD; and
(B) Affix a placard as required by
paragraph (2)(i)(A) of this AD or comply with
paragraph (2)(iii) of this AD.
(iii) At intervals not to exceed 600 hours
TIS:
(A) Before operating between 16,000 ft PA
and 18,000 ft PA, perform the ‘‘MAX N1
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:17 Feb 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
CHECK’’ by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.A.(1) (on pages 4
and 5), of ASB003. If the OEI rating is not
reached, either affix a placard as required by
paragraph (2)(i)(A) or comply with paragraph
(2)(iii)(B) or (2)(iii)(C) of this AD.
(B) Before operating between 13,000 ft PA
and 16,000 ft PA, perform the ‘‘MAX N1
CHECK’’ by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.A.(1) (on pages 5
and 6) of ASB003.
(1) If the OEI rating is reached, affix a
placard to the instrument panel in plain view
of the pilot(s), which states: ‘‘Maximum
operating altitude is 16,000 ft PA.’’
(2) If the OEI rating is not reached, either
affix a placard as required by paragraph
(2)(i)(A) or comply with paragraph (2)(iii)(C)
of this AD.
(C) Before operating between 10,000 ft PA
and 13,000 ft PA, perform the ‘‘MAX N1
CHECK’’ by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.A.1. (on page 7) of
ASB003.
(1) If the OEI rating is reached, affix a
placard to the instrument panel in plain view
of the pilot(s), which states: ‘‘Maximum
operating altitude is 13,000 ft PA.’’
(2) If the OEI rating is not reached, affix a
placard as required by paragraph (2)(i)(A) of
this AD.
(3) If an engine, FCU, engine module 2 or
engine module 3 is replaced, before any flight
operation at or above a PA of 10,000 feet,
comply with the requirements of paragraph
(1) of this AD for the Model MBB–BK 117
C–1 helicopter or paragraph (2) of this AD for
the Model MBB–BK 117 C–2 helicopter.
(4) Modifying both engines with
Turbomeca Modification TU 358 is
terminating action for the requirements of
this AD. After modifying both engines,
remove from the RFM the revised altitude
limitations and the revised performance
pages required by this AD.
(e) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOC)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Ed Cuevas,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email
ed.cuevas@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a Part
119 operating certificate or under Part 91,
Subpart K, we suggest that you notify your
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office or certificate holding
district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(f) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (Germany)
AD No.: 2008–0061, dated March 27, 2008.
(g) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 1100, Placards and Markings.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7007
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 27,
2012.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–3187 Filed 2–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0111; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–089–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A330–200 series
airplanes; Model A330–300 series
airplanes, Model A340–200 series
airplanes; Model A340–300 series
airplanes; Model A340–541 airplanes;
and Model A340–642 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by reports
of cracks in the bogie pivot pin caused
by material heating due to friction
between the bogie pivot pin and bush.
This proposed AD would require
performing a detailed inspection for
degradation of the bogie pivot pins and
pivot pin bushes of the main and central
landing gear for any cracks and damage,
and repairing or replacing bogie pivot
pins and pivot pin bushes, if necessary.
We are proposing this AD to correct and
detect cracks and damage to the main
and central landing gear, which could
result in the collapse of the landing gear
and adversely affect the airplane’s
continued safe flight and landing.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7005-7007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3187]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2012 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 7005]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0101; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-042-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH (ECD) Model MBB-BK 117 C-1 and C-2
helicopters. This proposed AD would require installing a placard that
corresponds to the maximum permissible flight altitude, amending the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) to revise the maximum permissible
operating altitude, and inserting revised performance charts into the
RFM. The proposed AD would also require a repetitive maintenance ``MAX
N1 CHECK'' to determine the appropriate maximum altitudes. The AD would
also require, if the engine or a fuel control unit (FCU) or module 2 or
3 is replaced, repeating the maintenance ``MAX N1 CHECK.'' Finally, the
proposed AD specifies that modifying both engines would provide
terminating action for the proposed AD requirements. This proposed AD
is prompted by the failure of a ``few'' engines to reach the specified
one-engine-inoperative (OEI) rating at altitudes above 10,000 feet. The
proposed actions are intended to prevent flights at altitudes where the
full OEI engine power cannot be reached and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter if an OEI operation is required.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 10, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, Texas
75053-4005; telephone (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3710; or at https://www.eurocopter.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Cuevas, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222-5110; email
ed.cuevas@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued AD No.:
2008-0061, dated March 27, 2008, to correct an unsafe condition for ECD
Model MBB-BK 117 C-1 and C-2 helicopters. EASA states that during
testing at maximum certification altitude, a few helicopters could not
reach the specified OEI power threshold. The cause was identified as an
engine acceleration limitation due to a lower delivered fuel flow than
the engine fuel flow demand needed to achieve the OEI rating at high
altitude. They state that this condition could occur at altitudes
exceeding 10,000 feet depending on the engine and FCU characteristics.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an unsafe condition exists and is
likely to exist or develop on other products of these same type
designs.
Related Service Information
ECD has issued Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. ASB-MBB-BK117-60-
121, Revision 4, (ASB121) for Model MBB-BK 117 C-1 helicopters and ASB
MBB BK117 C-2-71A-003, Revision 3 (ASB003), for Model MBB-BK 117 C-2
helicopters. Both ASBs are dated December 11, 2007, and apply to
Turbomeca Arriel 1E2 engines. Both ASBs specify a ``MAX N1 CHECK'' for
helicopters with FCUs that have not been modified by Turbomeca
[[Page 7006]]
modification TU 358, for takeoffs, landings, and hovering in-ground
effect (IGE) or hovering out-of-ground effect (OGE) higher than 10,000
feet or flight above 13,000 feet. The ASBs specify limiting the maximum
permissible flight altitude if the OEI rating cannot be achieved. The
ASBs also specify the measures are no longer necessary when you modify
both engines (Modification TU 358). EASA classified these ASBs as
mandatory and issued AD No.: 2008-0061, dated March 27, 2008, to ensure
the continued airworthiness of these helicopters.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require compliance with specified portions
of the manufacturer's service bulletin including installing a placard
that corresponds to the maximum permissible flight altitude, amending
the RFM to revise the maximum permissible operating altitude for both
the MBB-BK 117 C-1 and C-2 helicopters, and inserting revised
performance charts into the RFM for the C-1 model. This proposed AD
would also require maintenance ``MAX N1 CHECKs'' to determine the
modified maximum operational altitudes. This proposal would also
require, if the engine or an FCU or module 2 or 3 is replaced,
repeating the maintenance ``MAX N1 CHECK.'' Finally, this proposal
specifies that modifying both engines with Turbomeca Modification TU
358 is terminating action for the requirements of this proposed AD.
After the modification of both engines, you may remove the placards and
flight manual revisions required by this AD.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
We do not reference the effective date stated in the EASA AD
because it has passed. We have modified the initial placard wording to
make it clear that before performing the topping check, the ``operating
altitude'' for takeoff, landing, and hovering is a pressure altitude
(PA) of 10,000 feet, but flight up to a maximum 13,000 feet is
permitted as long as the helicopter stays at an airspeed above
effective translational lift. After the topping check is performed, the
``operating altitude'' limitation refers to all modes of flight.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 108 helicopters of
U.S. Registry.
We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order
to comply with this AD. It would take about 1 work-hour per helicopter
to affix a placard and insert the RFM pages at an average labor rate of
$85 per work-hour. We estimate 54 maintenance flight checks for higher
altitude operators would be required at $1,000 each. There are no parts
costs. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost impact of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $63,180.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
Airworthiness Directive (AD):
Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH: Docket No. FAA-2012-0101; Directorate
Identifier 2010-SW-042-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH (ECD) Model MBB-
BK 117 C-1 and C-2 helicopters with a Turbomeca Arriel 1E2 engine
installed, which has a Fuel Control Unit (FCU) that has not been
modified with Turbomeca Modification TU 358, certificated in any
category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as failure of engines to
reach the specified one-engine-inoperative (OEI) rating at altitudes
above 10,000 feet. This condition could result in high altitude
operations when full OEI engine power is not available and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter if an OEI operation is
required.
(c) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance.
(d) Required Actions
(1) For Model MBB-BK117 C-1 helicopters:
(i) Before any flight operation at or above a pressure altitude
(PA) of 10,000 feet, unless accomplished previously:
(A) Affix a placard to the instrument panel in plain view of the
pilot(s), which states: ``Maximum altitude for takeoff, landing, and
hovering is 10,000 ft PA. Maximum operating altitude above effective
translational lift is 13,000 ft PA,'' or comply with paragraph
(1)(iii) of this AD. The term ``hovering'' as used in this placard
includes both in-ground effect (IGE) and out-of-ground effect (OGE)
hovering.
(B) Revise the Altitude Limitations section of the Rotorcraft
Flight Manual (RFM), in accordance with paragraph 2.9 on pages 9 and
10; paragraph B.2.1. on page 15; and paragraph C.2.3.2. on page 16
of Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB-MBB-BK117-60-121,
Revision 4, dated December 11, 2007 (ASB121).
[[Page 7007]]
(C) Attach each revised page 11-1-7 (ASB121, page 11) through
11-1-10 (ASB121, page 14) to the unrevised same-numbered page in the
Performance section of the RFM.
(ii) Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS), unless accomplished
previously:
(A) Revise the RFM as required by paragraph (1)(i)(B) and
(1)(i)(C) of this AD; and
(B) Affix the placard as required by paragraph (1)(i)(A) of this
AD or comply with paragraph (1)(iii) of this AD.
(iii) At intervals not to exceed 600 hours TIS:
(A) Before operating between a 16,000 ft PA and 18,000 ft PA,
perform the ``MAX N1 CHECK'' by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1.1., of ASB121. If the OEI rating is
not reached, either affix a placard as required by paragraph
(1)(i)(A) or comply with paragraph (1)(iii)(B) or (1)(iii)(C) of
this AD.
(B) Before operating between 13,000 ft PA and 16,000 ft PA,
perform the ``MAX N1 CHECK'' by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1.4., of ASB121.
(1) If the OEI rating is reached, affix a placard to the
instrument panel in plain view of the pilot(s), which states:
``Maximum operating altitude is 16,000 ft PA.''
(2) If the OEI rating is not reached, either affix a placard as
required by paragraph (1)(i)(A) of this AD or comply with paragraph
(1)(iii)(C) of this AD.
(C) Before operating between 10,000 ft PA and 13,000 ft PA,
perform the ``MAX N1 CHECK'' by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1.7., of ASB121.
(1) If the OEI rating is reached, affix a placard to the
instrument panel in plain view of the pilot(s), which states:
``Maximum operating altitude is 13,000 ft PA.''
(2) If the OEI rating is not reached, affix a placard as
required by paragraph (1)(i)(A) of this AD.
(2) For Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters:
(i) Before any flight operation at or above a PA of 10,000 feet,
unless accomplished previously:
(A) Affix a placard to the instrument panel in plain view of the
pilot(s), which states: ``Maximum altitude for takeoff, landing, and
hovering is 10,000 ft PA. Maximum operating altitude above effective
translational lift is 13,000 ft PA,'' or comply with paragraph
(2)(iii) of this AD. The term ``hovering'' as used in this placard
includes both IGE and OGE hovering.
(B) Revise the Altitude Limitations section of the RFM in
accordance with paragraph A.2.3. on page 10 and paragraph 2.8. on
page 11 of Eurocopter ASB No. MBB BK117 C-2-71A-003, Revision 3,
dated December 11, 2007 (ASB003).
(ii) Within 50 hours TIS, unless accomplished previously:
(A) Revise the RFM as required by paragraph (2)(i)(B) of this
AD; and
(B) Affix a placard as required by paragraph (2)(i)(A) of this
AD or comply with paragraph (2)(iii) of this AD.
(iii) At intervals not to exceed 600 hours TIS:
(A) Before operating between 16,000 ft PA and 18,000 ft PA,
perform the ``MAX N1 CHECK'' by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.A.(1) (on pages 4 and 5), of ASB003. If
the OEI rating is not reached, either affix a placard as required by
paragraph (2)(i)(A) or comply with paragraph (2)(iii)(B) or
(2)(iii)(C) of this AD.
(B) Before operating between 13,000 ft PA and 16,000 ft PA,
perform the ``MAX N1 CHECK'' by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.A.(1) (on pages 5 and 6) of ASB003.
(1) If the OEI rating is reached, affix a placard to the
instrument panel in plain view of the pilot(s), which states:
``Maximum operating altitude is 16,000 ft PA.''
(2) If the OEI rating is not reached, either affix a placard as
required by paragraph (2)(i)(A) or comply with paragraph (2)(iii)(C)
of this AD.
(C) Before operating between 10,000 ft PA and 13,000 ft PA,
perform the ``MAX N1 CHECK'' by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.A.1. (on page 7) of ASB003.
(1) If the OEI rating is reached, affix a placard to the
instrument panel in plain view of the pilot(s), which states:
``Maximum operating altitude is 13,000 ft PA.''
(2) If the OEI rating is not reached, affix a placard as
required by paragraph (2)(i)(A) of this AD.
(3) If an engine, FCU, engine module 2 or engine module 3 is
replaced, before any flight operation at or above a PA of 10,000
feet, comply with the requirements of paragraph (1) of this AD for
the Model MBB-BK 117 C-1 helicopter or paragraph (2) of this AD for
the Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopter.
(4) Modifying both engines with Turbomeca Modification TU 358 is
terminating action for the requirements of this AD. After modifying
both engines, remove from the RFM the revised altitude limitations
and the revised performance pages required by this AD.
(e) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Ed Cuevas, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222-5110;
email ed.cuevas@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a Part 119 operating
certificate or under Part 91, Subpart K, we suggest that you notify
your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the
manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate
holding district office before operating any aircraft complying with
this AD through an AMOC.
(f) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety
Agency (Germany) AD No.: 2008-0061, dated March 27, 2008.
(g) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 1100, Placards and
Markings.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 27, 2012.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-3187 Filed 2-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P