Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge, Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell Counties, OK; Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, 7172-7174 [2012-3107]
Download as PDF
7172
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2012 / Notices
the link in the footer of
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Whitney, Fire Program Specialist,
United States Fire Administration,
National Fire Data Center, (301) 447–
1836 for additional information. You
may contact the Records Management
Division for copies of the proposed
collection of information at facsimile
number (202) 646–3347 or email
address: FEMA-Information-CollectionsManagement@dhs.gov.
The
National Commission on Fire
Prevention and Control conducted a
comprehensive study of the Nation’s fire
problem and recommended to Congress
actions to mitigate the fire problem,
reduce loss of life and property, and
educate the public on fire protection
and prevention. As a result of the study,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Type of respondent
State, Local,
ernment.
State, Local,
ernment.
State, Local,
ernment.
State, Local,
ernment.
State, Local,
ernment.
State, Local,
ernment.
State, Local,
ernment.
or Tribal Gov-
Title: National Fire Incident Reporting
System (NFIRS) v5.0.
Form name/form number
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total number
of responses
NFIC CD/on-site Orientation
200
1
200
4 hours .........
800
or Tribal Gov-
Introduction to NFRIS Distance Learning.
500
1
500
20 hours .......
10,000
23,890
........................
29,970,120
.......................
13,704,900
or Tribal Gov-
.............................................
Comments
Comments may be submitted as
indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a)
evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
21:29 Feb 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
1,304
299,920
22,770
1,303
29,669,310
30
1
60
Total annual
burden
(in hours)
or Tribal Gov-
or Tribal Gov-
230
Average
burden
per response
(in hours)
or Tribal Gov-
or Tribal Gov-
Estimated Cost: The estimated annual
operations and maintenance costs to
respondents or recordkeepers resulting
from the collection of information is
$13,775,850. The estimated annual cost
to the Federal Government is
$2,794,252.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Collection of Information
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
OMB Number: OMB No. 1660–0069.
Form Titles and Numbers: The
National Fire Incident Reporting System
(NFIRS) v5.0.
Abstract: NFIRS provides a
mechanism using standardized
reporting methods to collect and
analyze fire incident data at the Federal,
State, and local levels. Data analysis
helps local fire departments and States
to focus on current problems, predict
future problems in their communities,
and measure whether their programs are
working.
Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Number of Respondents: 23,890.
Number of Responses: 29,970,120.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 13,704,900 hours.
NFIRS Version 5.0 Modules
1–12 (Manual).
NFIRS Version 5.0 Modules
1–12 (Electronic).
NFA Program Manager
Training.
NFA Program Manager Orientation.
NFIC Training Workshop ....
Total .............................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Congress enacted Public Law 93–498,
Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act
of 1974, which establishes the U.S. Fire
Administration to administer fire
prevention and control programs,
supplement existing programs of
research, training, and education, and
encourage new and improved programs
and activities by State and local
governments. Section 9(a) of the Act
authorizes the Administrator, U.S. Fire
Administration (USFA), to operate
directly or through contracts or grants,
an integrated, comprehensive method to
select, analyze, publish, and
disseminate information related to
prevention, occurrence, control, and
results of fires of all types.
13,351,190
30
68 minutes
(1.13 hr).
27 min (0.45
hr).
48 hours .......
1
60
16 hours .......
960
100
1
100
16 hours .......
1,600
collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
John J. Jenkins, Jr.,
Acting Director, Records Management
Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department
of Homeland Security.
338,910
1,440
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–R–2011–N179;
XRS12610200000S3–123–FFO2R06000]
Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge,
Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell
Counties, OK; Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Impact Statement
[FR Doc. 2012–3055 Filed 2–9–12; 8:45 am]
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for
comments.
BILLING CODE 9111–45–P
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a comprehensive conservation
plan (CCP) for Sequoyah National
Wildlife Refuge (NWR; Refuge) in
Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell
Counties, Oklahoma. An environmental
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2012 / Notices
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
impact statement (EIS) evaluating effects
of various CCP alternatives will also be
prepared. We provide this notice in
compliance with our CCP policy to
advise other Federal and State agencies,
Tribes, and the public of our intentions,
and to obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues to
consider in the planning process. We
are also requesting public comments.
This notice also advises the public that
we have reconsidered a 1998 notice, in
which we announced our intention to
develop a CCP and environmental
assessment for the Refuge. Comments
already received in response to the
previous notice will be considered
during preparation of the subject
CCP/EIS. You do not need to resend
those comments.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by April
10, 2012. We will announce additional
opportunities for public input in local
news media throughout the CCP
process.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any of
the following methods.
Email: SequoyahNWRCCPEIS@fws.gov.
Fax: Attention: Carol Torrez, NEPA
Coordinator, at 505–248–6803.
U.S. Mail: Carol Torrez, NEPA
Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Southwest Regional Office, P.O.
Box 1306, Albuquerque, NM 87103.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off
comments Monday through Friday, 7:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., at the Sequoyah NWR
office headquarters, Route 1, Vian, OK.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Haas, Refuge Manager, Sequoyah NWR,
Route 1, Box 18–A, Vian, OK 74962;
phone: 918–773–5251 x 29; fax: 918–
773–5598; or Carol Torrez, NEPA
Coordinator, Southwest Regional Office,
by phone at 505–248–6821, or at the
address or fax above. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), please call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue our
process for developing a CCP for
Sequoyah NWR in Sequoyah, Muskogee,
and Haskell Counties, OK. This notice
complies with our CCP policy, and the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), to (1) Advise other Federal
and State agencies, Tribes, and the
public of our intention to conduct
detailed planning on this Refuge, and
(2) obtain suggestions and information
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:29 Feb 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
on the scope of issues to consider in the
environmental document and during
development of the CCP.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee), as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement
Act), requires the Service to develop a
CCP for each national wildlife refuge.
The purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS), consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Improvement
Act.
Each unit of the NWRS was
established for specific purposes. We
use these purposes as the foundation for
developing and prioritizing the
management goals and objectives for
each refuge within the NWRS mission,
and to determine how the public can
use each refuge. The planning process is
a way for the Service and the public to
evaluate management goals and
objectives that will ensure the best
possible approach to wildlife, plant, and
habitat conservation, while providing
for wildlife-dependent recreation
opportunities that are compatible with
each refuge’s establishing purposes and
the mission of the NWRS.
Our CCP process provides
participation opportunities for Tribal,
State, and local governments; agencies;
organizations; and the public. At this
time, we encourage input in the form of
issues, concerns, ideas, and suggestions
for the future management of Sequoyah
NWR.
Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge
In 1970, Sequoyah NWR was
established on the Robert S. Kerr
Reservoir as an overlay of a U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers’ project under the
authority of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 664),
expressly for migratory waterfowl.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7173
The Refuge manages 20,800 acres of
habitat for wildlife and allows for a
variety of public use opportunities and
experiences. The majority of the Refuge
is comprised of large interior floodplain
and riparian forests. Current habitat
management includes the maintenance
of wetlands and moist-soil units,
farming of 2,754 acres by cooperative
farmers, occasional prescribed burning,
and invasive species control. The
Refuge provides for more than 470
native wildlife species, including but
not limited to: Wild turkeys, bald eagles,
prothonotary warblers, wood ducks,
mallards, teal, common snipe, alligator
snapping turtles, white-tailed deer, map
turtles, snow geese, and green tree frogs.
Public use activities include all six
wildlife-dependent uses: Hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation,
photography, interpretation, and
environmental education. The Refuge
allows some use supportive of these six
so long as they are compatible with the
Refuge’s purpose and goals.
Previous Actions
We previously published a notice of
intent on June 19, 1998 (63 FR 33693),
stating that we intended to prepare a
CCP and EA for Sequoyah NWR. We
held a public meeting in March 1999, in
Vian, OK. Progress continued, albeit
slowed due to staff and priority changes,
through fall 2009. Another scoping
meeting, announced in local
newspapers, was held at the Refuge
Headquarters on February 23, 2010;
seventeen members of the public
attended this meeting and provided
comments.
During the summer of 2010, the
Southwest Region of the Service
initiated a review of all farming
programs on national wildlife refuges in
the region to ensure that the programs
were consistent with current laws and
policies such as the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, and that they met the
purposes for which the refuges were
established. At that time, this effort was
separate from the CCP planning process.
Scoping for the environmental
assessment (EA) on use of specified
genetically modified crops in
association with the cooperative farming
program at Sequoyah NWR began on
July 1, 2010. A draft EA on the use of
genetically modified crops in
association with the cooperative farming
program was released on April 1, 2011.
The comment period was open through
May 16, 2011.
Based on the public comments
already received, and subsequent
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
7174
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2012 / Notices
developments since scoping, we have
decided to combine the assessment of
using specified genetically modified
crops into the CCP and determined that
an environmental impact statement
(EIS) would be more appropriate than
an EA to ensure that a full and fair
discussion of all significant
environmental impacts occurs, and to
inform decision-makers and the public
of the reasonable alternatives that would
avoid or minimize adverse impacts and
enhance the quality of the human
environment. All comments we received
since 1998 from scoping and meetings
held on the Sequoyah National Wildlife
Refuge Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and the 2010 scoping effort on the
Draft EA for Use of Specified
Genetically Modified Crops and
Chemical Herbicides in Conjunction
with the Cooperative Farming Program
on the Sequoyah National Wildlife
Refuge, will still be considered during
the EIS planning process, so you do not
need to resubmit them. We will conduct
the environmental review of this project
and develop an EIS in accordance with
the requirements of NEPA, NEPA
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
other appropriate Federal laws and
regulations, and our policies and
procedures for compliance with those
laws and regulations.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns,
and Opportunities
We have identified preliminary
issues, concerns, and opportunities that
we will address in the CCP. We have
briefly summarized some of these issues
below. During public scoping, we may
identify additional issues.
Habitat
Concerns related to the restoration of
floodplain forests and cooperative
farming exist both among the public and
the Refuge staff. Past tree plantings were
aimed at habitat improvement and
carbon sequestration; they also resulted
in the closure of open areas that
facilitate public opportunities for
hunting and farming.
Sequoyah NWR has an on-Refuge
cooperative farming program, which has
a long history. This farmed acreage has
been reduced over the years. Topics of
concern regarding the Refuge’s farming
program include: (1) The number of
acres farmed; (2) the methods and crops
used; (3) the use of genetically modified
crops (the most significant issue
identified); and (4) the use of pesticides.
The issue of invasive species also
exists on the Refuge, including the
expansion of current colonies, the
introduction of new species, and the
new locations of colonies. The potential
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:29 Feb 09, 2012
Jkt 226001
effect of climate change on Refuge
habitat and associated wildlife
populations was another concern
expressed. Other scoping issues
included wetland and riparian habitat
restoration, land acquisition and
easement efforts, and water quality.
Wildlife
Endangered species and other species
of concern are a management focus of
the Refuge. The Interior least tern was
listed as endangered in 1985, and the
American burying beetle was listed in
1989; both of these endangered species
reside at Sequoyah National Wildlife
Refuge and are managed under their
respective recovery plans. The alligator
snapping turtle is another species of
concern on the Refuge, as the creeks,
lakes, wetlands, and riparian areas at
Sequoyah contain the unique habitat
requirements that this species needs.
Although the population of the alligator
snapping turtle has been declining, the
Refuge retains one of the largest
populations of the turtle in the area. The
planning team is concerned with
ensuring that viable populations of
these species are maintained.
Public Use
The appropriate balance of wildlifedependent recreation opportunities with
fish and wildlife conservation is very
important to the Refuge. The
interpretative and educational
opportunities, materials, and facilities at
Sequoyah are outdated or in need of
improvements. Some members of the
public are concerned about their access
to and opportunities for hunting and
fishing, which are the largest public
uses on the Refuge. Other members of
the public prefer minimizing these
programs or eradicating them altogether.
Increase of and improvements to the
Refuge’s wildlife observation and
photography opportunities may also be
warranted.
Facilities
Concern exists over access to the
Refuge, the quality and abundance of
public use facilities, and the
development and maintenance of
administrative facilities. Refuge access
issues center on the improvement,
maintenance, and accessibility of roads,
boat ramps, entrance points, and nature
trails. The administration of areas
closed to public use during certain
times of the year, increased parking,
improved bathroom facilities, enhanced
visitor displays, and additional boat
ramps are also concerns.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Public Involvement
You may send comments anytime
during the planning process by mail,
email, or fax (see ADDRESSES). There
will be additional opportunities to
provide public input once we have
prepared a draft CCP. Comments already
received under the previous notice will
be considered during preparation of the
CCP/EIS. You do not need to resend
these comments. The public’s ideas and
comments are an important part of the
meaningful comments that will help
determine the desired future conditions
of the Refuge and address the full range
of Refuge issues and opportunities.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: January 23, 2012.
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2012–3107 Filed 2–9–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–FHC–2012–N030;
FVHC98130406900Y4–XXX–FF04G01000]
Correction Notice for Deepwater
Horizon Oil Spill; Draft Phase I Early
Restoration Plan and Environmental
Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments; correction.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), and the Framework Agreement
for Early Restoration Addressing
Injuries Resulting from the Deepwater
Horizon Oil Spill, the Federal and State
natural resource trustee agencies
(Trustees) prepared a Draft Early
Restoration Plan and Environmental
Assessment (DERP/EA) describing and
proposing a suite of early restoration
projects intended to commence the
process of restoring natural resources
and services injured or lost as a result
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7172-7174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3107]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R2-R-2011-N179; XRS12610200000S3-123-FFO2R06000]
Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge, Sequoyah, Muskogee, and
Haskell Counties, OK; Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental
Impact Statement
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) for Sequoyah National
Wildlife Refuge (NWR; Refuge) in Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell
Counties, Oklahoma. An environmental
[[Page 7173]]
impact statement (EIS) evaluating effects of various CCP alternatives
will also be prepared. We provide this notice in compliance with our
CCP policy to advise other Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and the
public of our intentions, and to obtain suggestions and information on
the scope of issues to consider in the planning process. We are also
requesting public comments. This notice also advises the public that we
have reconsidered a 1998 notice, in which we announced our intention to
develop a CCP and environmental assessment for the Refuge. Comments
already received in response to the previous notice will be considered
during preparation of the subject CCP/EIS. You do not need to resend
those comments.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
April 10, 2012. We will announce additional opportunities for public
input in local news media throughout the CCP process.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
of the following methods.
Email: SequoyahNWRCCP-EIS@fws.gov.
Fax: Attention: Carol Torrez, NEPA Coordinator, at 505-248-6803.
U.S. Mail: Carol Torrez, NEPA Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Southwest Regional Office, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, NM
87103.
In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off comments Monday through
Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., at the Sequoyah NWR office headquarters,
Route 1, Vian, OK.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Haas, Refuge Manager, Sequoyah
NWR, Route 1, Box 18-A, Vian, OK 74962; phone: 918-773-5251 x 29; fax:
918-773-5598; or Carol Torrez, NEPA Coordinator, Southwest Regional
Office, by phone at 505-248-6821, or at the address or fax above. If
you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue our process for developing a CCP for
Sequoyah NWR in Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell Counties, OK. This
notice complies with our CCP policy, and the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), to (1)
Advise other Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and the public of our
intention to conduct detailed planning on this Refuge, and (2) obtain
suggestions and information on the scope of issues to consider in the
environmental document and during development of the CCP.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act), requires the Service to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify
wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the public,
including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Improvement Act.
Each unit of the NWRS was established for specific purposes. We use
these purposes as the foundation for developing and prioritizing the
management goals and objectives for each refuge within the NWRS
mission, and to determine how the public can use each refuge. The
planning process is a way for the Service and the public to evaluate
management goals and objectives that will ensure the best possible
approach to wildlife, plant, and habitat conservation, while providing
for wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities that are compatible
with each refuge's establishing purposes and the mission of the NWRS.
Our CCP process provides participation opportunities for Tribal,
State, and local governments; agencies; organizations; and the public.
At this time, we encourage input in the form of issues, concerns,
ideas, and suggestions for the future management of Sequoyah NWR.
Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge
In 1970, Sequoyah NWR was established on the Robert S. Kerr
Reservoir as an overlay of a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' project
under the authority of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16
U.S.C. 664), expressly for migratory waterfowl.
The Refuge manages 20,800 acres of habitat for wildlife and allows
for a variety of public use opportunities and experiences. The majority
of the Refuge is comprised of large interior floodplain and riparian
forests. Current habitat management includes the maintenance of
wetlands and moist-soil units, farming of 2,754 acres by cooperative
farmers, occasional prescribed burning, and invasive species control.
The Refuge provides for more than 470 native wildlife species,
including but not limited to: Wild turkeys, bald eagles, prothonotary
warblers, wood ducks, mallards, teal, common snipe, alligator snapping
turtles, white-tailed deer, map turtles, snow geese, and green tree
frogs. Public use activities include all six wildlife-dependent uses:
Hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, photography, interpretation,
and environmental education. The Refuge allows some use supportive of
these six so long as they are compatible with the Refuge's purpose and
goals.
Previous Actions
We previously published a notice of intent on June 19, 1998 (63 FR
33693), stating that we intended to prepare a CCP and EA for Sequoyah
NWR. We held a public meeting in March 1999, in Vian, OK. Progress
continued, albeit slowed due to staff and priority changes, through
fall 2009. Another scoping meeting, announced in local newspapers, was
held at the Refuge Headquarters on February 23, 2010; seventeen members
of the public attended this meeting and provided comments.
During the summer of 2010, the Southwest Region of the Service
initiated a review of all farming programs on national wildlife refuges
in the region to ensure that the programs were consistent with current
laws and policies such as the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, and that they met the purposes for which the
refuges were established. At that time, this effort was separate from
the CCP planning process. Scoping for the environmental assessment (EA)
on use of specified genetically modified crops in association with the
cooperative farming program at Sequoyah NWR began on July 1, 2010. A
draft EA on the use of genetically modified crops in association with
the cooperative farming program was released on April 1, 2011. The
comment period was open through May 16, 2011.
Based on the public comments already received, and subsequent
[[Page 7174]]
developments since scoping, we have decided to combine the assessment
of using specified genetically modified crops into the CCP and
determined that an environmental impact statement (EIS) would be more
appropriate than an EA to ensure that a full and fair discussion of all
significant environmental impacts occurs, and to inform decision-makers
and the public of the reasonable alternatives that would avoid or
minimize adverse impacts and enhance the quality of the human
environment. All comments we received since 1998 from scoping and
meetings held on the Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and the 2010 scoping effort on the Draft EA for Use
of Specified Genetically Modified Crops and Chemical Herbicides in
Conjunction with the Cooperative Farming Program on the Sequoyah
National Wildlife Refuge, will still be considered during the EIS
planning process, so you do not need to resubmit them. We will conduct
the environmental review of this project and develop an EIS in
accordance with the requirements of NEPA, NEPA regulations (40 CFR
parts 1500-1508), other appropriate Federal laws and regulations, and
our policies and procedures for compliance with those laws and
regulations.
Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities
We have identified preliminary issues, concerns, and opportunities
that we will address in the CCP. We have briefly summarized some of
these issues below. During public scoping, we may identify additional
issues.
Habitat
Concerns related to the restoration of floodplain forests and
cooperative farming exist both among the public and the Refuge staff.
Past tree plantings were aimed at habitat improvement and carbon
sequestration; they also resulted in the closure of open areas that
facilitate public opportunities for hunting and farming.
Sequoyah NWR has an on-Refuge cooperative farming program, which
has a long history. This farmed acreage has been reduced over the
years. Topics of concern regarding the Refuge's farming program
include: (1) The number of acres farmed; (2) the methods and crops
used; (3) the use of genetically modified crops (the most significant
issue identified); and (4) the use of pesticides.
The issue of invasive species also exists on the Refuge, including
the expansion of current colonies, the introduction of new species, and
the new locations of colonies. The potential effect of climate change
on Refuge habitat and associated wildlife populations was another
concern expressed. Other scoping issues included wetland and riparian
habitat restoration, land acquisition and easement efforts, and water
quality.
Wildlife
Endangered species and other species of concern are a management
focus of the Refuge. The Interior least tern was listed as endangered
in 1985, and the American burying beetle was listed in 1989; both of
these endangered species reside at Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge
and are managed under their respective recovery plans. The alligator
snapping turtle is another species of concern on the Refuge, as the
creeks, lakes, wetlands, and riparian areas at Sequoyah contain the
unique habitat requirements that this species needs. Although the
population of the alligator snapping turtle has been declining, the
Refuge retains one of the largest populations of the turtle in the
area. The planning team is concerned with ensuring that viable
populations of these species are maintained.
Public Use
The appropriate balance of wildlife-dependent recreation
opportunities with fish and wildlife conservation is very important to
the Refuge. The interpretative and educational opportunities,
materials, and facilities at Sequoyah are outdated or in need of
improvements. Some members of the public are concerned about their
access to and opportunities for hunting and fishing, which are the
largest public uses on the Refuge. Other members of the public prefer
minimizing these programs or eradicating them altogether. Increase of
and improvements to the Refuge's wildlife observation and photography
opportunities may also be warranted.
Facilities
Concern exists over access to the Refuge, the quality and abundance
of public use facilities, and the development and maintenance of
administrative facilities. Refuge access issues center on the
improvement, maintenance, and accessibility of roads, boat ramps,
entrance points, and nature trails. The administration of areas closed
to public use during certain times of the year, increased parking,
improved bathroom facilities, enhanced visitor displays, and additional
boat ramps are also concerns.
Public Involvement
You may send comments anytime during the planning process by mail,
email, or fax (see ADDRESSES). There will be additional opportunities
to provide public input once we have prepared a draft CCP. Comments
already received under the previous notice will be considered during
preparation of the CCP/EIS. You do not need to resend these comments.
The public's ideas and comments are an important part of the meaningful
comments that will help determine the desired future conditions of the
Refuge and address the full range of Refuge issues and opportunities.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: January 23, 2012.
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-3107 Filed 2-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P