Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge, Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell Counties, OK; Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, 7172-7174 [2012-3107]

Download as PDF 7172 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2012 / Notices the link in the footer of www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Whitney, Fire Program Specialist, United States Fire Administration, National Fire Data Center, (301) 447– 1836 for additional information. You may contact the Records Management Division for copies of the proposed collection of information at facsimile number (202) 646–3347 or email address: FEMA-Information-CollectionsManagement@dhs.gov. The National Commission on Fire Prevention and Control conducted a comprehensive study of the Nation’s fire problem and recommended to Congress actions to mitigate the fire problem, reduce loss of life and property, and educate the public on fire protection and prevention. As a result of the study, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Type of respondent State, Local, ernment. State, Local, ernment. State, Local, ernment. State, Local, ernment. State, Local, ernment. State, Local, ernment. State, Local, ernment. or Tribal Gov- Title: National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) v5.0. Form name/form number Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Total number of responses NFIC CD/on-site Orientation 200 1 200 4 hours ......... 800 or Tribal Gov- Introduction to NFRIS Distance Learning. 500 1 500 20 hours ....... 10,000 23,890 ........................ 29,970,120 ....................... 13,704,900 or Tribal Gov- ............................................. Comments Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 21:29 Feb 09, 2012 Jkt 226001 1,304 299,920 22,770 1,303 29,669,310 30 1 60 Total annual burden (in hours) or Tribal Gov- or Tribal Gov- 230 Average burden per response (in hours) or Tribal Gov- or Tribal Gov- Estimated Cost: The estimated annual operations and maintenance costs to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information is $13,775,850. The estimated annual cost to the Federal Government is $2,794,252. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Collection of Information Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved information collection. OMB Number: OMB No. 1660–0069. Form Titles and Numbers: The National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) v5.0. Abstract: NFIRS provides a mechanism using standardized reporting methods to collect and analyze fire incident data at the Federal, State, and local levels. Data analysis helps local fire departments and States to focus on current problems, predict future problems in their communities, and measure whether their programs are working. Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government. Number of Respondents: 23,890. Number of Responses: 29,970,120. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 13,704,900 hours. NFIRS Version 5.0 Modules 1–12 (Manual). NFIRS Version 5.0 Modules 1–12 (Electronic). NFA Program Manager Training. NFA Program Manager Orientation. NFIC Training Workshop .... Total ............................. VerDate Mar<15>2010 Congress enacted Public Law 93–498, Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974, which establishes the U.S. Fire Administration to administer fire prevention and control programs, supplement existing programs of research, training, and education, and encourage new and improved programs and activities by State and local governments. Section 9(a) of the Act authorizes the Administrator, U.S. Fire Administration (USFA), to operate directly or through contracts or grants, an integrated, comprehensive method to select, analyze, publish, and disseminate information related to prevention, occurrence, control, and results of fires of all types. 13,351,190 30 68 minutes (1.13 hr). 27 min (0.45 hr). 48 hours ....... 1 60 16 hours ....... 960 100 1 100 16 hours ....... 1,600 collected; and (d) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. John J. Jenkins, Jr., Acting Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. 338,910 1,440 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R2–R–2011–N179; XRS12610200000S3–123–FFO2R06000] Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge, Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell Counties, OK; Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement [FR Doc. 2012–3055 Filed 2–9–12; 8:45 am] Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of intent; request for comments. BILLING CODE 9111–45–P SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 AGENCY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to prepare a comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) for Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge (NWR; Refuge) in Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell Counties, Oklahoma. An environmental Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2012 / Notices srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES impact statement (EIS) evaluating effects of various CCP alternatives will also be prepared. We provide this notice in compliance with our CCP policy to advise other Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and the public of our intentions, and to obtain suggestions and information on the scope of issues to consider in the planning process. We are also requesting public comments. This notice also advises the public that we have reconsidered a 1998 notice, in which we announced our intention to develop a CCP and environmental assessment for the Refuge. Comments already received in response to the previous notice will be considered during preparation of the subject CCP/EIS. You do not need to resend those comments. DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by April 10, 2012. We will announce additional opportunities for public input in local news media throughout the CCP process. ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any of the following methods. Email: SequoyahNWRCCPEIS@fws.gov. Fax: Attention: Carol Torrez, NEPA Coordinator, at 505–248–6803. U.S. Mail: Carol Torrez, NEPA Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Regional Office, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, NM 87103. In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off comments Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., at the Sequoyah NWR office headquarters, Route 1, Vian, OK. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Haas, Refuge Manager, Sequoyah NWR, Route 1, Box 18–A, Vian, OK 74962; phone: 918–773–5251 x 29; fax: 918– 773–5598; or Carol Torrez, NEPA Coordinator, Southwest Regional Office, by phone at 505–248–6821, or at the address or fax above. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Introduction With this notice, we continue our process for developing a CCP for Sequoyah NWR in Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell Counties, OK. This notice complies with our CCP policy, and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), to (1) Advise other Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and the public of our intention to conduct detailed planning on this Refuge, and (2) obtain suggestions and information VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:29 Feb 09, 2012 Jkt 226001 on the scope of issues to consider in the environmental document and during development of the CCP. Background The CCP Process The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act), requires the Service to develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with the Improvement Act. Each unit of the NWRS was established for specific purposes. We use these purposes as the foundation for developing and prioritizing the management goals and objectives for each refuge within the NWRS mission, and to determine how the public can use each refuge. The planning process is a way for the Service and the public to evaluate management goals and objectives that will ensure the best possible approach to wildlife, plant, and habitat conservation, while providing for wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities that are compatible with each refuge’s establishing purposes and the mission of the NWRS. Our CCP process provides participation opportunities for Tribal, State, and local governments; agencies; organizations; and the public. At this time, we encourage input in the form of issues, concerns, ideas, and suggestions for the future management of Sequoyah NWR. Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge In 1970, Sequoyah NWR was established on the Robert S. Kerr Reservoir as an overlay of a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ project under the authority of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 664), expressly for migratory waterfowl. PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7173 The Refuge manages 20,800 acres of habitat for wildlife and allows for a variety of public use opportunities and experiences. The majority of the Refuge is comprised of large interior floodplain and riparian forests. Current habitat management includes the maintenance of wetlands and moist-soil units, farming of 2,754 acres by cooperative farmers, occasional prescribed burning, and invasive species control. The Refuge provides for more than 470 native wildlife species, including but not limited to: Wild turkeys, bald eagles, prothonotary warblers, wood ducks, mallards, teal, common snipe, alligator snapping turtles, white-tailed deer, map turtles, snow geese, and green tree frogs. Public use activities include all six wildlife-dependent uses: Hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, photography, interpretation, and environmental education. The Refuge allows some use supportive of these six so long as they are compatible with the Refuge’s purpose and goals. Previous Actions We previously published a notice of intent on June 19, 1998 (63 FR 33693), stating that we intended to prepare a CCP and EA for Sequoyah NWR. We held a public meeting in March 1999, in Vian, OK. Progress continued, albeit slowed due to staff and priority changes, through fall 2009. Another scoping meeting, announced in local newspapers, was held at the Refuge Headquarters on February 23, 2010; seventeen members of the public attended this meeting and provided comments. During the summer of 2010, the Southwest Region of the Service initiated a review of all farming programs on national wildlife refuges in the region to ensure that the programs were consistent with current laws and policies such as the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, and that they met the purposes for which the refuges were established. At that time, this effort was separate from the CCP planning process. Scoping for the environmental assessment (EA) on use of specified genetically modified crops in association with the cooperative farming program at Sequoyah NWR began on July 1, 2010. A draft EA on the use of genetically modified crops in association with the cooperative farming program was released on April 1, 2011. The comment period was open through May 16, 2011. Based on the public comments already received, and subsequent E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 7174 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2012 / Notices developments since scoping, we have decided to combine the assessment of using specified genetically modified crops into the CCP and determined that an environmental impact statement (EIS) would be more appropriate than an EA to ensure that a full and fair discussion of all significant environmental impacts occurs, and to inform decision-makers and the public of the reasonable alternatives that would avoid or minimize adverse impacts and enhance the quality of the human environment. All comments we received since 1998 from scoping and meetings held on the Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan and the 2010 scoping effort on the Draft EA for Use of Specified Genetically Modified Crops and Chemical Herbicides in Conjunction with the Cooperative Farming Program on the Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge, will still be considered during the EIS planning process, so you do not need to resubmit them. We will conduct the environmental review of this project and develop an EIS in accordance with the requirements of NEPA, NEPA regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), other appropriate Federal laws and regulations, and our policies and procedures for compliance with those laws and regulations. srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities We have identified preliminary issues, concerns, and opportunities that we will address in the CCP. We have briefly summarized some of these issues below. During public scoping, we may identify additional issues. Habitat Concerns related to the restoration of floodplain forests and cooperative farming exist both among the public and the Refuge staff. Past tree plantings were aimed at habitat improvement and carbon sequestration; they also resulted in the closure of open areas that facilitate public opportunities for hunting and farming. Sequoyah NWR has an on-Refuge cooperative farming program, which has a long history. This farmed acreage has been reduced over the years. Topics of concern regarding the Refuge’s farming program include: (1) The number of acres farmed; (2) the methods and crops used; (3) the use of genetically modified crops (the most significant issue identified); and (4) the use of pesticides. The issue of invasive species also exists on the Refuge, including the expansion of current colonies, the introduction of new species, and the new locations of colonies. The potential VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:29 Feb 09, 2012 Jkt 226001 effect of climate change on Refuge habitat and associated wildlife populations was another concern expressed. Other scoping issues included wetland and riparian habitat restoration, land acquisition and easement efforts, and water quality. Wildlife Endangered species and other species of concern are a management focus of the Refuge. The Interior least tern was listed as endangered in 1985, and the American burying beetle was listed in 1989; both of these endangered species reside at Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge and are managed under their respective recovery plans. The alligator snapping turtle is another species of concern on the Refuge, as the creeks, lakes, wetlands, and riparian areas at Sequoyah contain the unique habitat requirements that this species needs. Although the population of the alligator snapping turtle has been declining, the Refuge retains one of the largest populations of the turtle in the area. The planning team is concerned with ensuring that viable populations of these species are maintained. Public Use The appropriate balance of wildlifedependent recreation opportunities with fish and wildlife conservation is very important to the Refuge. The interpretative and educational opportunities, materials, and facilities at Sequoyah are outdated or in need of improvements. Some members of the public are concerned about their access to and opportunities for hunting and fishing, which are the largest public uses on the Refuge. Other members of the public prefer minimizing these programs or eradicating them altogether. Increase of and improvements to the Refuge’s wildlife observation and photography opportunities may also be warranted. Facilities Concern exists over access to the Refuge, the quality and abundance of public use facilities, and the development and maintenance of administrative facilities. Refuge access issues center on the improvement, maintenance, and accessibility of roads, boat ramps, entrance points, and nature trails. The administration of areas closed to public use during certain times of the year, increased parking, improved bathroom facilities, enhanced visitor displays, and additional boat ramps are also concerns. PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Public Involvement You may send comments anytime during the planning process by mail, email, or fax (see ADDRESSES). There will be additional opportunities to provide public input once we have prepared a draft CCP. Comments already received under the previous notice will be considered during preparation of the CCP/EIS. You do not need to resend these comments. The public’s ideas and comments are an important part of the meaningful comments that will help determine the desired future conditions of the Refuge and address the full range of Refuge issues and opportunities. Public Availability of Comments Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: January 23, 2012. Joy E. Nicholopoulos, Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region. [FR Doc. 2012–3107 Filed 2–9–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R4–FHC–2012–N030; FVHC98130406900Y4–XXX–FF04G01000] Correction Notice for Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill; Draft Phase I Early Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments; correction. AGENCY: In accordance with the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the Framework Agreement for Early Restoration Addressing Injuries Resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, the Federal and State natural resource trustee agencies (Trustees) prepared a Draft Early Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment (DERP/EA) describing and proposing a suite of early restoration projects intended to commence the process of restoring natural resources and services injured or lost as a result SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7172-7174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3107]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R2-R-2011-N179; XRS12610200000S3-123-FFO2R06000]


Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge, Sequoyah, Muskogee, and 
Haskell Counties, OK; Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental 
Impact Statement

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to 
prepare a comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) for Sequoyah National 
Wildlife Refuge (NWR; Refuge) in Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell 
Counties, Oklahoma. An environmental

[[Page 7173]]

impact statement (EIS) evaluating effects of various CCP alternatives 
will also be prepared. We provide this notice in compliance with our 
CCP policy to advise other Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and the 
public of our intentions, and to obtain suggestions and information on 
the scope of issues to consider in the planning process. We are also 
requesting public comments. This notice also advises the public that we 
have reconsidered a 1998 notice, in which we announced our intention to 
develop a CCP and environmental assessment for the Refuge. Comments 
already received in response to the previous notice will be considered 
during preparation of the subject CCP/EIS. You do not need to resend 
those comments.

DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by 
April 10, 2012. We will announce additional opportunities for public 
input in local news media throughout the CCP process.

ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any 
of the following methods.
    Email: SequoyahNWRCCP-EIS@fws.gov.
    Fax: Attention: Carol Torrez, NEPA Coordinator, at 505-248-6803.
    U.S. Mail: Carol Torrez, NEPA Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Southwest Regional Office, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, NM 
87103.
    In-Person Drop-off: You may drop off comments Monday through 
Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., at the Sequoyah NWR office headquarters, 
Route 1, Vian, OK.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Haas, Refuge Manager, Sequoyah 
NWR, Route 1, Box 18-A, Vian, OK 74962; phone: 918-773-5251 x 29; fax: 
918-773-5598; or Carol Torrez, NEPA Coordinator, Southwest Regional 
Office, by phone at 505-248-6821, or at the address or fax above. If 
you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the 
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Introduction

    With this notice, we continue our process for developing a CCP for 
Sequoyah NWR in Sequoyah, Muskogee, and Haskell Counties, OK. This 
notice complies with our CCP policy, and the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), to (1) 
Advise other Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and the public of our 
intention to conduct detailed planning on this Refuge, and (2) obtain 
suggestions and information on the scope of issues to consider in the 
environmental document and during development of the CCP.

Background

The CCP Process

    The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act), requires the Service to 
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for 
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for 
achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the 
National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound 
principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal 
mandates, and our policies. In addition to outlining broad management 
direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify 
wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, 
including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and 
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will 
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with 
the Improvement Act.
    Each unit of the NWRS was established for specific purposes. We use 
these purposes as the foundation for developing and prioritizing the 
management goals and objectives for each refuge within the NWRS 
mission, and to determine how the public can use each refuge. The 
planning process is a way for the Service and the public to evaluate 
management goals and objectives that will ensure the best possible 
approach to wildlife, plant, and habitat conservation, while providing 
for wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities that are compatible 
with each refuge's establishing purposes and the mission of the NWRS.
    Our CCP process provides participation opportunities for Tribal, 
State, and local governments; agencies; organizations; and the public. 
At this time, we encourage input in the form of issues, concerns, 
ideas, and suggestions for the future management of Sequoyah NWR.

Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge

    In 1970, Sequoyah NWR was established on the Robert S. Kerr 
Reservoir as an overlay of a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' project 
under the authority of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 
U.S.C. 664), expressly for migratory waterfowl.
    The Refuge manages 20,800 acres of habitat for wildlife and allows 
for a variety of public use opportunities and experiences. The majority 
of the Refuge is comprised of large interior floodplain and riparian 
forests. Current habitat management includes the maintenance of 
wetlands and moist-soil units, farming of 2,754 acres by cooperative 
farmers, occasional prescribed burning, and invasive species control. 
The Refuge provides for more than 470 native wildlife species, 
including but not limited to: Wild turkeys, bald eagles, prothonotary 
warblers, wood ducks, mallards, teal, common snipe, alligator snapping 
turtles, white-tailed deer, map turtles, snow geese, and green tree 
frogs. Public use activities include all six wildlife-dependent uses: 
Hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, photography, interpretation, 
and environmental education. The Refuge allows some use supportive of 
these six so long as they are compatible with the Refuge's purpose and 
goals.

Previous Actions

    We previously published a notice of intent on June 19, 1998 (63 FR 
33693), stating that we intended to prepare a CCP and EA for Sequoyah 
NWR. We held a public meeting in March 1999, in Vian, OK. Progress 
continued, albeit slowed due to staff and priority changes, through 
fall 2009. Another scoping meeting, announced in local newspapers, was 
held at the Refuge Headquarters on February 23, 2010; seventeen members 
of the public attended this meeting and provided comments.
    During the summer of 2010, the Southwest Region of the Service 
initiated a review of all farming programs on national wildlife refuges 
in the region to ensure that the programs were consistent with current 
laws and policies such as the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Improvement Act of 1997, and that they met the purposes for which the 
refuges were established. At that time, this effort was separate from 
the CCP planning process. Scoping for the environmental assessment (EA) 
on use of specified genetically modified crops in association with the 
cooperative farming program at Sequoyah NWR began on July 1, 2010. A 
draft EA on the use of genetically modified crops in association with 
the cooperative farming program was released on April 1, 2011. The 
comment period was open through May 16, 2011.
    Based on the public comments already received, and subsequent

[[Page 7174]]

developments since scoping, we have decided to combine the assessment 
of using specified genetically modified crops into the CCP and 
determined that an environmental impact statement (EIS) would be more 
appropriate than an EA to ensure that a full and fair discussion of all 
significant environmental impacts occurs, and to inform decision-makers 
and the public of the reasonable alternatives that would avoid or 
minimize adverse impacts and enhance the quality of the human 
environment. All comments we received since 1998 from scoping and 
meetings held on the Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive 
Conservation Plan and the 2010 scoping effort on the Draft EA for Use 
of Specified Genetically Modified Crops and Chemical Herbicides in 
Conjunction with the Cooperative Farming Program on the Sequoyah 
National Wildlife Refuge, will still be considered during the EIS 
planning process, so you do not need to resubmit them. We will conduct 
the environmental review of this project and develop an EIS in 
accordance with the requirements of NEPA, NEPA regulations (40 CFR 
parts 1500-1508), other appropriate Federal laws and regulations, and 
our policies and procedures for compliance with those laws and 
regulations.

Scoping: Preliminary Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities

    We have identified preliminary issues, concerns, and opportunities 
that we will address in the CCP. We have briefly summarized some of 
these issues below. During public scoping, we may identify additional 
issues.

Habitat

    Concerns related to the restoration of floodplain forests and 
cooperative farming exist both among the public and the Refuge staff. 
Past tree plantings were aimed at habitat improvement and carbon 
sequestration; they also resulted in the closure of open areas that 
facilitate public opportunities for hunting and farming.
    Sequoyah NWR has an on-Refuge cooperative farming program, which 
has a long history. This farmed acreage has been reduced over the 
years. Topics of concern regarding the Refuge's farming program 
include: (1) The number of acres farmed; (2) the methods and crops 
used; (3) the use of genetically modified crops (the most significant 
issue identified); and (4) the use of pesticides.
    The issue of invasive species also exists on the Refuge, including 
the expansion of current colonies, the introduction of new species, and 
the new locations of colonies. The potential effect of climate change 
on Refuge habitat and associated wildlife populations was another 
concern expressed. Other scoping issues included wetland and riparian 
habitat restoration, land acquisition and easement efforts, and water 
quality.

Wildlife

    Endangered species and other species of concern are a management 
focus of the Refuge. The Interior least tern was listed as endangered 
in 1985, and the American burying beetle was listed in 1989; both of 
these endangered species reside at Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge 
and are managed under their respective recovery plans. The alligator 
snapping turtle is another species of concern on the Refuge, as the 
creeks, lakes, wetlands, and riparian areas at Sequoyah contain the 
unique habitat requirements that this species needs. Although the 
population of the alligator snapping turtle has been declining, the 
Refuge retains one of the largest populations of the turtle in the 
area. The planning team is concerned with ensuring that viable 
populations of these species are maintained.

Public Use

    The appropriate balance of wildlife-dependent recreation 
opportunities with fish and wildlife conservation is very important to 
the Refuge. The interpretative and educational opportunities, 
materials, and facilities at Sequoyah are outdated or in need of 
improvements. Some members of the public are concerned about their 
access to and opportunities for hunting and fishing, which are the 
largest public uses on the Refuge. Other members of the public prefer 
minimizing these programs or eradicating them altogether. Increase of 
and improvements to the Refuge's wildlife observation and photography 
opportunities may also be warranted.

Facilities

    Concern exists over access to the Refuge, the quality and abundance 
of public use facilities, and the development and maintenance of 
administrative facilities. Refuge access issues center on the 
improvement, maintenance, and accessibility of roads, boat ramps, 
entrance points, and nature trails. The administration of areas closed 
to public use during certain times of the year, increased parking, 
improved bathroom facilities, enhanced visitor displays, and additional 
boat ramps are also concerns.

Public Involvement

    You may send comments anytime during the planning process by mail, 
email, or fax (see ADDRESSES). There will be additional opportunities 
to provide public input once we have prepared a draft CCP. Comments 
already received under the previous notice will be considered during 
preparation of the CCP/EIS. You do not need to resend these comments. 
The public's ideas and comments are an important part of the meaningful 
comments that will help determine the desired future conditions of the 
Refuge and address the full range of Refuge issues and opportunities.

Public Availability of Comments

    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Dated: January 23, 2012.
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-3107 Filed 2-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.