Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 6692-6694 [2012-3036]
Download as PDF
6692
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
(t) Related Information
Refer to MCAI Airworthiness Directive CF–
1992–26R2, dated September 1, 2010, and the
following service information for related
information.
(1) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–
A463, Revision 2, dated March 13, 2001.
(2) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–
A454, Revision 3, dated March 13, 2001.
(3) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215–
A454, Revision 4, dated November 18, 2009.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
26, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–3031 Filed 2–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0110; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–148–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 737–100,
–200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500
series airplanes equipped with analog
transient suppression devices (ATSDs)
installed in accordance with
Supplemental Type Certificate number
ST00146BO. This proposed AD was
prompted by multiple reports of
corrosion on ATSDs. This proposed AD
would require revising the maintenance
program to incorporate certain
limitations. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct corrosion on ATSDs,
which could result in the loss of high
voltage transient protection (e.g.,
lightning protection) in the fuel tanks
and consequent fuel tank explosion and
loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 26, 2012.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Feb 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Goodrich
Corporation, Sensors and Integrated
Systems, 100 Panton Road, Vergennes,
Vermont 05491; phone: 802–877–4580;
fax: 802–877–4444; email:
les.blades@goodrich.com; Internet:
https://www.goodrich.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marc Ronell, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, ANE–
150, FAA, New England Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington,
Massachusetts 01803; phone: 781–238–
7776; fax: 781–238–7170; email:
marc.ronell@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2012–0110; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–148–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received at least six reports
of corrosion on the housings of ATSDs.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in the loss of high voltage
transient protection (e.g., lightning
protection) in the fuel tanks and
consequent fuel tank explosion and loss
of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Goodrich Principal
Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness Manual for the Analog
Transient Suppression Device
Installation Applicable to Boeing 737–
100 through -500 Airplanes
Supplemental Type Certificate—
ST00146BO, Document T3044–0010–
0101, Revision D, dated September 26,
2011, which describes various
limitations, including Critical Design
Control Limitations (CDCCL),
inspections, and checks of the ATSD,
ground straps, and safe-side harness.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 384 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
6693
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Revise maintenance program ...................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ...........
$0
$85
$32,640
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Feb 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
transient protection (e.g., lightning
protection) in the fuel tanks and consequent
fuel tank explosion and loss of the airplane.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2012–0110; Directorate Identifier 2011–
NM–148–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 26,
2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400,
and –500 series airplanes, certificated in any
category, with an original airworthiness
certificate or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued before September 26,
2011, equipped with analog transient
suppression devices (ATSDs) installed in
accordance with Supplemental Type
Certificate number ST00146BO.
Note 1 to paragraphs (c), (g), and (h): This
AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new
actions (e.g., inspections and/or Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations
(CDCCLs). Compliance with these actions is
required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered,
or repaired in the areas addressed by these
inspections, the operator may not be able to
accomplish the inspections described in the
revisions. In this situation, to comply with 14
CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) according to paragraph
(i) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required actions
that will ensure the continued operational
safety of the airplane.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 2841, Fuel Quantity Indicator.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by multiple reports
of corrosion on ATSDs. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct corrosion on ATSDs,
which could result in the loss of high voltage
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(g) Maintenance Program Revision
Within 3 months after the effective date of
this AD, revise the maintenance program to
incorporate the limitations specified in
Goodrich Principal Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness Manual for the
Analog Transient Suppression Device
Installation Applicable to Boeing 737–100
through –500 Airplanes Supplemental Type
Certificate—ST00146BO, Document T3044–
0010–0101, Revision D, dated September 26,
2011. The initial compliance time for
accomplishing each task is at the applicable
time specified in Goodrich Principal
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness
Manual for the Analog Transient Suppression
Device Installation Applicable to Boeing
737–100 through –500 Airplanes
Supplemental Type Certificate—ST00146BO,
Document T3044–0010–0101, Revision D,
dated September 26, 2011, or within 18
months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
Note 2 to paragraph (g): Components that
have been identified as airworthy or installed
on the affected airplanes before the revision
of the maintenance program, as required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, do not need to be
reworked in accordance with the CDCCLs.
However, once the maintenance program has
been revised, paragraph (g) of this AD
requires that future maintenance actions on
these components must follow the CDCCLs.
(h) No Alternative Actions Intervals, and/or
Critical Design Configuration Control
Limitations
After accomplishing the revision required
by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or
CDCCLs may be used other than those
specified in Goodrich Principal Instructions
for Continued Airworthiness Manual for the
Analog Transient Suppression Device
Installation Applicable to Boeing 737–100
through –500 Airplanes Supplemental Type
Certificate—ST00146BO, Document T3044–
0010–0101, Revision D, dated September 26,
2011, unless the actions, intervals, and/or
CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(1) The Manager, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
6694
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Marc Ronell, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, ANE–150,
FAA, New England Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), 12 New England Executive
Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803;
phone: 781–238–7776; fax: 781–238–7170;
email: marc.ronell@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Goodrich Corporation,
Sensors and Integrated Systems, 100 Panton
Road, Vergennes, Vermont 05491; phone:
802–877–4580; fax: 802–877–4444; email:
les.blades@goodrich.com; Internet: https://
www.goodrich.com/TechPubs. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
23, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012–3036 Filed 2–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Chapter I
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0012]
Notice of Proposed Policy Clarification
for the Registration of Aircraft to U.S.
Citizen Trustees in Situations Involving
Non-U.S. Citizen Trustors and
Beneficiaries
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed FAA Policy.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given of the
FAA’s proposed policy regarding the
registration of aircraft to U.S. Citizen
Trustees in situations involving NonU.S. citizen trustors and beneficiaries.
DATES: Written public comments
regarding this FAA proposed policy
should be submitted by March 31, 2012,
via email to ladeana.peden@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LaDeana Peden at 405–954–3296, Office
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Feb 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
of Aeronautical Center Counsel, Federal
Aviation Administration.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has been reviewing policies and
practices regarding the registration of
aircraft in the United States involving
U.S. citizen trustees and non-U.S.
citizen trustors and beneficiaries. Such
arrangements are commonly referred to
as non-citizen trusts. The FAA began its
review in part because of problems the
FAA has experienced in obtaining
important operational and maintenance
information concerning such aircraft
from the registered owners, i.e., the
owner trustees. The problems in
obtaining such information in turn
affected the FAA’s ability to conduct
fully effective oversight of such aircraft
when operated outside the United
States, and to provide foreign civil
aviation authorities with information on
those operations in support of the safety
oversight activities of those authorities.
The FAA also undertook the review of
non-citizen trusts because of concerns
that some of those arrangements may
not have complied with FAA
requirements for non-citizen trusts.
As part of its review of non-citizen
trusts, the FAA published a notice of
public meeting inviting members of the
public to discuss the use of non-citizen
trusts to register aircraft in the United
States. See 76 FR 23353 (April 26,
2011). In the notice, the FAA set forth
several questions in order to elicit a
robust discussion of the issues. Among
other things, the FAA summarized the
requirements in existing U.S. law that
only an ‘‘owner’’ may register an
aircraft, and that generally speaking
only citizens of the United States that
are owners are eligible to register
aircraft. Thus, the FAA Aircraft Registry
is an ‘‘ownership’’ registry. It is not an
‘‘operator’’ registry.
The FAA met with interested
members of the public on June 1, 2011,
in Oklahoma City. Representatives of
trade associations, law firms, aircraft
manufacturers, lenders, lessors, aircraft
operators, trustees and others were
present. The proceedings of that
meeting were transcribed. The transcript
is available for members of the public to
read. Copies of the transcript (File No.
A505180) may be purchased through
Atkinson-Baker, Inc., Court Reporters,
via email at abi@depo.com or by
contacting Customer Service at 800–
288–3376.
The FAA received a number of
written comments from members of the
public in response to the questions
raised in the April 26, 2011 Federal
Register notice. The FAA also received
written comments in response to its
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
request at the conclusion of the public
meeting for additional input from the
meeting participants and all others who
had an interest in the issues
surrounding non-citizen trusts. An
organization (the Aviation Working
Group) that represents a wide range of
aviation industry participants on
aviation regulatory and commercial
issues submitted a document on May
26, 2011, in which its members and
other supporting entities shared their
views concerning the various questions
posed by the FAA in its April 26, 2011
Federal Register notice. That
organization also participated at the
public meeting on June 1, 2011, and
submitted additional written comments
on June 30, 2011.
The discussion at the public meeting
and the written comments received by
the FAA have helped it to better
understand the practices and concerns
of the aviation industry with regard to
the use of non-citizen trusts to register
aircraft in the United States. In addition,
the FAA gained a better understanding
of the perceptions that exist with regard
to the regulatory obligations on a trustee
with regard to it registering an aircraft
in the United States using a non-citizen
trust. The FAA’s improved
understanding has allowed it to sharpen
the focus of its review of non-citizen
trusts. The FAA also believes that the
public meeting was useful in helping
members of the public to better
understand the critical safety
information that the FAA needs to
communicate to aircraft operators,
through owner trustees, and the critical
information that the FAA needs to
receive from them in order for the FAA
to meet its safety oversight obligations
under international and U.S. law.
The FAA will discuss the issues in
terms of the law and safety since the
two are greatly intertwined.
International law and U.S. law impose
safety oversight responsibilities on the
FAA, existing law restricts aircraft
registration in the U.S. to ‘‘owners,’’ and
existing law imposes certain safety
requirements on aircraft owners. After
the FAA discusses the legal issues, the
FAA will suggest which provisions in
trust agreements may need to be
changed and it will suggest language
that would enable the FAA to facilitate
the registration of aircraft in the future
that are owned in trust. The suggested
language and the reasons for the
suggested language, if adopted as the
FAA’s final policy on this matter, will
guide the FAA in the future in
determining eligibility for registering
non-U.S. citizen trusts. An example of a
standard trust agreement with FAA-
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6692-6694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3036]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0110; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-148-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and
-500 series airplanes equipped with analog transient suppression
devices (ATSDs) installed in accordance with Supplemental Type
Certificate number ST00146BO. This proposed AD was prompted by multiple
reports of corrosion on ATSDs. This proposed AD would require revising
the maintenance program to incorporate certain limitations. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct corrosion on ATSDs, which could
result in the loss of high voltage transient protection (e.g.,
lightning protection) in the fuel tanks and consequent fuel tank
explosion and loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 26, 2012.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Goodrich Corporation, Sensors and Integrated Systems, 100 Panton Road,
Vergennes, Vermont 05491; phone: 802-877-4580; fax: 802-877-4444;
email: les.blades@goodrich.com; Internet: https://www.goodrich.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc Ronell, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, ANE-150, FAA, New England Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
Massachusetts 01803; phone: 781-238-7776; fax: 781-238-7170; email:
marc.ronell@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0110;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-148-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received at least six reports of corrosion on the housings
of ATSDs. This condition, if not corrected, could result in the loss of
high voltage transient protection (e.g., lightning protection) in the
fuel tanks and consequent fuel tank explosion and loss of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Goodrich Principal Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness Manual for the Analog Transient Suppression Device
Installation Applicable to Boeing 737-100 through -500 Airplanes
Supplemental Type Certificate--ST00146BO, Document T3044-0010-0101,
Revision D, dated September 26, 2011, which describes various
limitations, including Critical Design Control Limitations (CDCCL),
inspections, and checks of the ATSD, ground straps, and safe-side
harness.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 384 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
[[Page 6693]]
Estimated costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revise maintenance program....... 1 work-hour x $85 $0 $85 $32,640
per hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2012-0110; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-148-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 26, 2012.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any
category, with an original airworthiness certificate or original
export certificate of airworthiness issued before September 26,
2011, equipped with analog transient suppression devices (ATSDs)
installed in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate number
ST00146BO.
Note 1 to paragraphs (c), (g), and (h): This AD requires
revisions to certain operator maintenance documents to include new
actions (e.g., inspections and/or Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCLs). Compliance with these actions is
required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that have been
previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by
these inspections, the operator may not be able to accomplish the
inspections described in the revisions. In this situation, to comply
with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) according to paragraph (i)
of this AD. The request should include a description of changes to
the required actions that will ensure the continued operational
safety of the airplane.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 2841, Fuel Quantity Indicator.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by multiple reports of corrosion on ATSDs.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion on ATSDs,
which could result in the loss of high voltage transient protection
(e.g., lightning protection) in the fuel tanks and consequent fuel
tank explosion and loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Maintenance Program Revision
Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, revise the
maintenance program to incorporate the limitations specified in
Goodrich Principal Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Manual
for the Analog Transient Suppression Device Installation Applicable
to Boeing 737-100 through -500 Airplanes Supplemental Type
Certificate--ST00146BO, Document T3044-0010-0101, Revision D, dated
September 26, 2011. The initial compliance time for accomplishing
each task is at the applicable time specified in Goodrich Principal
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Manual for the Analog
Transient Suppression Device Installation Applicable to Boeing 737-
100 through -500 Airplanes Supplemental Type Certificate--ST00146BO,
Document T3044-0010-0101, Revision D, dated September 26, 2011, or
within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
Note 2 to paragraph (g): Components that have been identified as
airworthy or installed on the affected airplanes before the revision
of the maintenance program, as required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
do not need to be reworked in accordance with the CDCCLs. However,
once the maintenance program has been revised, paragraph (g) of this
AD requires that future maintenance actions on these components must
follow the CDCCLs.
(h) No Alternative Actions Intervals, and/or Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations
After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/
or CDCCLs may be used other than those specified in Goodrich
Principal Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Manual for the
Analog Transient Suppression Device Installation Applicable to
Boeing 737-100 through -500 Airplanes Supplemental Type
Certificate--ST00146BO, Document T3044-0010-0101, Revision D, dated
September 26, 2011, unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are
approved as an AMOC in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(1) The Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19,
[[Page 6694]]
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the
person identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Marc Ronell,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine and Propeller Directorate, ANE-150, FAA,
New England Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803; phone: 781-238-
7776; fax: 781-238-7170; email: marc.ronell@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Goodrich Corporation, Sensors and Integrated Systems, 100 Panton
Road, Vergennes, Vermont 05491; phone: 802-877-4580; fax: 802-877-
4444; email: les.blades@goodrich.com; Internet: https://www.goodrich.com/TechPubs. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 23, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-3036 Filed 2-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P