Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; State of Florida; Control of Large Municipal Waste Combustor (LMWC) Emissions From Existing Facilities; Correction, 6681-6682 [2012-2884]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
final determination was posted. The
Secretary will notify participants that
they may view copies of filings at post
offices where the final determination
was posted.
§ 3025.30
Suspension pending review.
(a) Application. Application for
suspension of a determination of the
Postal Service to close or consolidate
any post office pending the outcome of
an appeal to the Postal Regulatory
Commission shall be made at the time
of the filing of a Petition for Review.
The application shall show the reasons
for the relief requested and the facts
relied upon, and if the facts are subject
to dispute the application shall be
supported by affidavits or other sworn
statements or copies thereof. The
applicant must be a person served by
the affected post office. Immediate
notice of the application shall be given
to all parties to the proceeding. The
application shall be filed with the
Secretary of the Commission.
(b) Answer and filing of the relevant
record by the Postal Service. Within 10
days after the application for suspension
is filed, the Postal Service shall file with
the Secretary of the Commission and
serve on the petitioners an answer to the
application supported by affidavits or
other sworn statements or copies
thereof.
§ 3025.40
Participant statement.
(a) When a timely Petition for Review
of a decision to close or consolidate a
post office is filed, the Secretary shall
furnish petitioner with a copy of PRC
Form 61. This form is designed to
inform petitioners on how to make a
statement of his/her arguments in
support of the petition.
(b) The instructions for PRC Form 61
shall provide:
(1) A concise explanation of the
purpose of the form;
(2) A copy of section 404(d)(2)(A) of
title 39, United States Code; and
(3) Notification that, if petitioner
prefers, he or she may file a brief in lieu
of or in addition to completing PRC
Form 61.
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
§ 3025.41 Due date for participant
statement.
The statement or brief of petitioner
and of any other participant seeking to
have the Commission return the entire
matter to the Postal Service for further
consideration, shall be filed not more
than 20 days after the filing of the
administrative record.
§ 3025.42 Due date for Postal Service
response.
The statement or brief of the Postal
Service, and of any other participant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Feb 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
opposing return of the matter for further
consideration, shall be filed not more
than 14 days after the date for filing of
petitioner’s statement.
§ 3025.43
Service.
Due date for replies to the Postal
Petitioner, and any other participant
seeking to have the Commission return
the matter for further consideration,
may file a reply to the Postal Service
response not more than 10 days after the
date of the Postal Service response.
Replies are limited to issues discussed
in the responses of the Postal Service
and other participants seeking
affirmation of the Postal Service
determination.
[FR Doc. 2012–2931 Filed 2–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0392(a); FRL–9628–
6]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants; State of Florida; Control of
Large Municipal Waste Combustor
(LMWC) Emissions From Existing
Facilities; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
On December 30, 2010, EPA
published a final rule approving the
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(d)/129
State Plan (the Plan) submitted by the
Florida Department of Environmental
Protection for the State of Florida on
July 12, 2007, for implementing and
enforcing the Emissions Guidelines
(EGs) applicable to existing Large
Municipal Waste Combustors (LMWCs).
These EGs apply to municipal waste
combustors with a capacity to combust
more than 250 tons per day of
municipal solid waste (MSW). This
action corrects an error in the regulatory
language in paragraph (a) of EPA’s
December 30, 2010, final rule.
DATES: This action is effective February
9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the
documentation used in the action being
corrected are available for inspection
during normal business hours at the
following location: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960. The Regional Office’s official
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6681
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Garver, Air Toxics Assessment
and Implementation Section, Air Toxics
and Monitoring Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9839.
Mr. Garver can also be reached via
electronic mail at
garver.daniel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action corrects an error in the regulatory
language for an entry that appears in
paragraph (a) of Florida’s Identification
of Sources at 40 CFR 62.2355. The final
action determined that EPA approved
the CAA section 111(d)/129 Plan
applicable to LMWCs in the State of
Florida on December 30, 2010 (75 FR
82269). However, EPA inadvertently
indicated in 40 CFR 62.2355(a) that ‘‘the
plan applies to existing facilities with a
municipal waste combustor (MWC) unit
capacity greater than 250 tons per day
of MSW, and for which construction,
reconstruction, or modification was
commenced on or before July 12, 2007.’’
The correct date is September 20, 1994.
Therefore, EPA is correcting this error
by deleting the date ‘‘July 12, 2007’’ and
inserting the correct date ‘‘September
20, 1994.’’
EPA has determined that today’s
action falls under the ‘‘good cause’’
exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’
authorizes agencies to dispense with
public participation where public notice
and comment procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. Public notice and
comment for this action are unnecessary
because today’s action to correct an
inadvertent error contained in
paragraph (a) of 40 CFR 62.2355 of the
rulemaking and has no substantive
impact on EPA’s December 30, 2010,
approval. In addition, EPA can identify
no particular reason why the public
would be interested in being notified of
the correction, or in having the
opportunity to comment on the
correction prior to this action being
finalized, since this correction action
does not change the meaning of EPA’s
analysis or action to approve the
amendment in paragraph (a) to 40 CFR
62.2355.
EPA also finds that there is good
cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for
this correction to become effective on
the date of publication of this action.
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
6682
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 27 / Thursday, February 9, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with RULES
Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an
effective date less than 30 days after
publication ‘‘as otherwise provided by
the agency for good cause found and
published with the rule.’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day
waiting period prescribed in APA
section 553(d)(3) is to give affected
parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final
rule takes effect. Today’s rule, however,
does not create any new regulatory
requirements such that affected parties
would need time to prepare before the
rule takes effect. Rather, today’s action
merely corrects an error in paragraph (a)
of a prior rulemaking by correcting the
date as identified above in 40 CFR
62.2355 in a revision, which EPA
approved on December 30, 2010. For
these reasons, EPA finds good cause
under APA section 553(d)(3) for this
correction to become effective on the
date of publication of this action.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely corrects an
error in paragraph (a) of a prior
rulemaking by correcting the date as
identified above in 40 CFR 62.2355,
which EPA approved on December 30,
2010, and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule merely corrects an inadvertent error
in paragraph (a) of a prior rule, and does
not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required by state law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
rule also does not have Federalism
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Feb 08, 2012
Jkt 226001
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule merely
corrects an error in paragraph (a) of a
prior rulemaking by correcting the date
as identified above in 40 CFR 62.2355,
in a revision which EPA approved on
December 30, 2010, and does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established
in the CAA. This rule also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant. In addition,
this rule does not involve technical
standards, thus the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply. This rule also does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 9, 2012. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this rule for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See CAA section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter.
Dated: December 9, 2011.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K—Florida
2. In § 62.2355, paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 62.2355
Identification of sources.
(a) The plan applies to existing
facilities with a municipal waste
combustor (MWC) unit capacity greater
than 250 tons per day of municipal solid
waste (MSW), and for which
construction, reconstruction, or
modification was commenced on or
before September 20, 1994.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–2884 Filed 2–8–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No. 110781394–2048–02]
RIN 0648–BB09
Marine Mammals; Subsistence Taking
of Northern Fur Seals; Harvest
Estimates
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final estimates of annual fur
seal subsistence needs.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the regulations
governing the subsistence taking of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6681-6682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2884]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R04-OAR-2010-0392(a); FRL-9628-6]
Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants; State of Florida; Control of Large Municipal
Waste Combustor (LMWC) Emissions From Existing Facilities; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On December 30, 2010, EPA published a final rule approving the
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(d)/129 State Plan (the Plan) submitted
by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for the State of
Florida on July 12, 2007, for implementing and enforcing the Emissions
Guidelines (EGs) applicable to existing Large Municipal Waste
Combustors (LMWCs). These EGs apply to municipal waste combustors with
a capacity to combust more than 250 tons per day of municipal solid
waste (MSW). This action corrects an error in the regulatory language
in paragraph (a) of EPA's December 30, 2010, final rule.
DATES: This action is effective February 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the documentation used in the action being
corrected are available for inspection during normal business hours at
the following location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4,
61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Garver, Air Toxics Assessment
and Implementation Section, Air Toxics and Monitoring Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 562-9839. Mr. Garver can also
be reached via electronic mail at garver.daniel@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action corrects an error in the
regulatory language for an entry that appears in paragraph (a) of
Florida's Identification of Sources at 40 CFR 62.2355. The final action
determined that EPA approved the CAA section 111(d)/129 Plan applicable
to LMWCs in the State of Florida on December 30, 2010 (75 FR 82269).
However, EPA inadvertently indicated in 40 CFR 62.2355(a) that ``the
plan applies to existing facilities with a municipal waste combustor
(MWC) unit capacity greater than 250 tons per day of MSW, and for which
construction, reconstruction, or modification was commenced on or
before July 12, 2007.'' The correct date is September 20, 1994.
Therefore, EPA is correcting this error by deleting the date ``July 12,
2007'' and inserting the correct date ``September 20, 1994.''
EPA has determined that today's action falls under the ``good
cause'' exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) which, upon finding ``good cause,'' authorizes
agencies to dispense with public participation where public notice and
comment procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. Public notice and comment for this action are
unnecessary because today's action to correct an inadvertent error
contained in paragraph (a) of 40 CFR 62.2355 of the rulemaking and has
no substantive impact on EPA's December 30, 2010, approval. In
addition, EPA can identify no particular reason why the public would be
interested in being notified of the correction, or in having the
opportunity to comment on the correction prior to this action being
finalized, since this correction action does not change the meaning of
EPA's analysis or action to approve the amendment in paragraph (a) to
40 CFR 62.2355.
EPA also finds that there is good cause under APA section 553(d)(3)
for this correction to become effective on the date of publication of
this action.
[[Page 6682]]
Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an effective date less than 30 days
after publication ``as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause
found and published with the rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The purpose of
the 30-day waiting period prescribed in APA section 553(d)(3) is to
give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior and
prepare before the final rule takes effect. Today's rule, however, does
not create any new regulatory requirements such that affected parties
would need time to prepare before the rule takes effect. Rather,
today's action merely corrects an error in paragraph (a) of a prior
rulemaking by correcting the date as identified above in 40 CFR 62.2355
in a revision, which EPA approved on December 30, 2010. For these
reasons, EPA finds good cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for this
correction to become effective on the date of publication of this
action.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely corrects an error in paragraph (a) of a prior rulemaking by
correcting the date as identified above in 40 CFR 62.2355, which EPA
approved on December 30, 2010, and imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule merely corrects an
inadvertent error in paragraph (a) of a prior rule, and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This rule also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule merely corrects an error in
paragraph (a) of a prior rulemaking by correcting the date as
identified above in 40 CFR 62.2355, in a revision which EPA approved on
December 30, 2010, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. This
rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. In
addition, this rule does not involve technical standards, thus the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule
also does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 9, 2012. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to
file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed
rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of
today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for
judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw
this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See CAA section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter.
Dated: December 9, 2011.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K--Florida
0
2. In Sec. 62.2355, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 62.2355 Identification of sources.
(a) The plan applies to existing facilities with a municipal waste
combustor (MWC) unit capacity greater than 250 tons per day of
municipal solid waste (MSW), and for which construction,
reconstruction, or modification was commenced on or before September
20, 1994.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-2884 Filed 2-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P