Modification of Significant New Uses of Tris Carbamoyl Triazine, 6476-6479 [2012-2909]
Download as PDF
6476
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2011–0108; FRL–9330–6]
RIN 2070–AB27
Modification of Significant New Uses
of Tris Carbamoyl Triazine
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is finalizing an
amendment to the significant new use
rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
for the chemical substance identified
generically as tris carbamoyl triazine,
which was the subject to
premanufacture notice (PMN) P–95–
1098. This action requires persons who
intend to manufacture, import, or
process the chemical substance for a use
that is designated as a significant new
use by this final rule to notify EPA at
least 90 days before commencing that
activity. EPA believes that this action is
necessary because new uses of the
chemical substance may be hazardous to
human health. The required notification
would provide EPA with the
opportunity to evaluate the intended
use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit
that activity before it occurs.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPPT–2011–0108. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm.
3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of
the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
566–0280. Docket visitors are required
to show photographic identification,
pass through a metal detector, and sign
the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are
processed through an X-ray machine
and subject to search. Visitors will be
provided an EPA/DC badge that must be
visible at all times in the building and
returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Tracey
Klosterman, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–2209; email address:
klosterman.tracey@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCAHotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, import,
process, or use the chemical substance
identified generically as tris carbamoyl
triazine (PMN P–95–1098). Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
Manufacturers, importers, or
processors of the subject chemical
substance (NAICS codes 325 and
324110), e.g., chemical manufacturing
and petroleum refineries.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions in
§ 721.5. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
This action may also affect certain
entities through pre-existing import
certification and export notification
rules under TSCA. Chemical importers
are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15
U.S.C. 2612) import certification
requirements promulgated at 19 CFR
12.118 through 12.127 and 19 CFR
127.28. Chemical importers must certify
that the shipment of the chemical
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
substance complies with all applicable
rules and orders under TSCA. Importers
of chemicals subject to a SNUR must
certify their compliance with the SNUR
requirements. The EPA policy in
support of import certification appears
at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B. In
addition, any persons who export or
intend to export the chemical substance
that is the subject of a proposed or final
SNUR are subject to the export
notification provisions of TSCA section
12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see § 721.20),
and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part
707, subpart D.
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is finalizing an amendment to
the SNUR for the chemical substance
identified generically as tris carbamoyl
triazine (PMN P–95–1098) codified at 40
CFR 721.9719. This final action requires
persons who intend to manufacture,
import, or process the chemical
substance for an activity that is
designated as a significant new use by
this final rule to notify EPA at least 90
days before commencing that activity.
This rule was proposed in the Federal
Register issue of August 3, 2011 (76 FR
46678) (FRL–8878–3). EPA received no
public comments in response to the
proposal. Therefore, the Agency is
issuing a final SNUR, as proposed that:
1. Identifies those forms of the PMN
substance that are exempt from the
provisions of the SNUR. These
exemptions apply to quantities of the
PMN substance after it has been
completely reacted (cured).
2. Adds protection in the workplace
requirements under § 721.63 for
respiratory protection and alternative
New Chemical Exposure Limit (NCEL)
exposure monitoring to address the
newly-identified potential risks from
inhalation exposure in the workplace.
3. Revises the hazard communication
requirements under § 721.72 to add the
human health hazard and exposures and
remove the environmental hazards and
exposures.
4. Removes all release to water
requirements under § 721.90.
5. Revises the recordkeeping
requirements under § 721.125 to reflect
the modified significant new uses.
B. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C.
2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to determine
that a use of a chemical substance is a
‘‘significant new use.’’ EPA must make
this determination by rule after
considering all relevant factors,
E:\FR\FM\08FER1.SGM
08FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
including the four bulleted TSCA
section 5(a)(2) factors, listed in Unit IV.
of this document. Once EPA determines
that a use of a chemical substance is a
significant new use, TSCA section
5(a)(1)(B) requires persons to submit a
significant new use notice (SNUN) to
EPA at least 90 days before they
manufacture, import, or process the
chemical substance for that use. Persons
who must report are described in
§ 721.5.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Rationale for the Rule
During review of PMN P–95–1098, the
chemical substance identified
generically as tris carbamoyl triazine,
EPA concluded that regulation was
warranted under TSCA section 5(e),
pending the development of information
sufficient to make reasoned evaluations
of the health or environmental effects of
this chemical substance. The basis for
such findings is outlined in Unit II. of
the proposed rule to amend this SNUR,
included in the Federal Register issue
of August 3, 2011 (76 FR 46678) and in
the Federal Register document of
August 20, 1998 (63 FR 44562) (FRL–
5788–7). Based on these findings, a
TSCA section 5(e) consent order
requiring the use of appropriate
exposure controls was negotiated with
the PMN submitter. The SNUR
provisions for this chemical substance
were consistent with the provisions of
the original TSCA section 5(e) consent
order. The SNUR was promulgated
pursuant to § 721.160.
After the review of test data submitted
pursuant to the TSCA section 5(e)
consent order for PMN P–95–1098 (see
Unit II. of the proposed rule) and
consideration of the factors included in
TSCA section 5(a)(2) (see Unit IV. of this
document), EPA determined that the
chemical substance may pose an
unreasonable risk to human health, but
also that the finding that certain
activities involving the substance may
present an unreasonable risk to the
environment was no longer supported.
Consequently, EPA is finalizing this
modification to the SNUR at § 721.9719
according to procedures in § 721.160
and § 721.185, so that SNUR provisions
for this chemical substance remain
consistent with the provisions of the
TSCA section 5(e) consent order, as
modified.
IV. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that
EPA’s determination that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new
use must be made after consideration of
all relevant factors, including:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
• The projected volume of
manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
• The extent to which a use changes
the type or form of exposure of human
beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
• The extent to which a use increases
the magnitude and duration of exposure
of human beings or the environment to
a chemical substance.
• The reasonably anticipated manner
and methods of manufacturing,
processing, distribution in commerce,
and disposal of a chemical substance.
In addition to these factors
enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2), the
statute authorizes EPA to consider any
other relevant factors. To determine
what would constitute a significant new
use for the chemical substance
identified generically as tris carbamoyl
triazine (PMN P–95–1098), EPA
considered relevant information about
the toxicity of the chemical substance,
likely human exposures and
environmental releases associated with
possible uses, taking into consideration
the four bulleted TSCA section 5(a)(2)
factors listed in this unit.
V. Applicability of Rule to Uses
Occurring Before Effective Date of the
Final Rule
As discussed in the Federal Register
issue of April 24, 1990 (55 FR 17376),
EPA has decided that the intent of
TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) is best served by
designating a use as a significant new
use as of the date of publication of the
proposed SNUR rather than as of the
effective date of the final rule. If uses
begun after publication were considered
ongoing rather than new, it would be
difficult for EPA to establish SNUR
notice requirements, because a person
could defeat the SNUR by initiating the
proposed significant new use before the
rule became effective, and then argue
that the use was ongoing as of the
effective date of the final rule.
Any persons who began commercial
manufacture, import, or processing
activities with the chemical substance
identified generically as tris carbamoyl
triazine (PMN P–95–1098), for any of
the significant new uses designated in
the proposed SNUR modification after
the date of publication of the proposed
SNUR, must stop that activity before the
effective date of this final rule. Persons
who ceased those activities will have to
meet all SNUR notice requirements and
wait until the end of the notice review
period, including all extensions, before
engaging in any activities designated as
significant new uses.
EPA has promulgated provisions to
allow persons to comply with this
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6477
SNUR before the effective date. If a
person were to meet the conditions of
advance compliance under § 721.45(h),
the person would be considered to have
met the requirements of this final SNUR
for those activities.
VI. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5
does not require the development of any
particular test data before submission of
a SNUN. There are two exceptions:
1. Development of test data is
required where the chemical substance
subject to the SNUR is also subject to a
test rule under TSCA section 4 (see
TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be
necessary where the chemical substance
has been listed under TSCA section
5(b)(4) (see TSCA section 5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4
test rule or a TSCA section 5(b)(4)
listing covering the chemical substance,
persons are required only to submit test
data in their possession or control and
to describe any other data known to or
reasonably ascertainable by them (see
§ 720.50). However, upon review of
PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing.
In this case, EPA recommends persons,
before performing any testing, to consult
with the Agency pertaining to protocol
selection.
The recommended testing specified in
Unit II.A. of the proposed rule may not
be the only means of addressing the
potential risks of the chemical
substance. However, SNUNs submitted
without any test data may increase the
likelihood that EPA will take action
under TSCA section 5(e), particularly if
satisfactory test results have not been
obtained from a prior PMN or SNUN
submitter. EPA recommends that
potential SNUN submitters contact EPA
early enough so that they will be able
to conduct the appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware
that EPA will be better able to evaluate
SNUNs which provide detailed
information on the following:
• Human exposure and
environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the
chemical substances.
• Potential benefits of the chemical
substances.
• Information on risks posed by the
chemical substances compared to risks
posed by potential substitutes.
VII. SNUN Submissions
According to 40 CFR 721.1(c), persons
submitting a SNUN must comply with
the same notice requirements and EPA
regulatory procedures as persons
submitting a PMN, including
E:\FR\FM\08FER1.SGM
08FER1
6478
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
submission of test data on health and
environmental effects as described in
§ 720.50. SNUNs must be on EPA Form
No. 7710–25, generated using e-PMN
software, and submitted to the Agency
in accordance with the procedures set
forth in §§ 721.25 and 720.40. E–PMN
software is available electronically at
https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems.
VIII. Economic Analysis
EPA evaluated the potential costs of
establishing SNUN requirements for
potential manufacturers, importers, and
processors of the chemical substance
during the development of the direct
final rule. The Agency’s complete
Economic Analysis is available in the
docket under docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPPT–2011–0108.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This action modifies a SNUR for a
chemical substance that is the subject of
a PMN and TSCA section 5(e) consent
order. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993).
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., an Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
that requires OMB approval under PRA,
unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40
of the CFR, after appearing in the
Federal Register, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if
applicable.
The information collection
requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB
pursuant to PRA under OMB control
number 2070–0012 (EPA ICR No. 574).
This action does not impose any burden
requiring additional OMB approval. If
an entity were to submit a SNUN to the
Agency, the annual burden is estimated
to average between 30 and 170 hours
per response. This burden estimate
includes the time needed to review
instructions, search existing data
sources, gather and maintain the data
needed, and complete, review, and
submit the required SNUN.
Send any comments about the
accuracy of the burden estimate, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including through
the use of automated collection
techniques, to the Director, Collection
Strategies Division, Office of
Environmental Information (2822T),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. Please remember to
include the OMB control number in any
correspondence, but do not submit any
completed forms to this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby
certifies that promulgation of this
modified SNUR will not have a
significant adverse economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The rationale supporting this
conclusion is discussed in this unit. The
requirement to submit a SNUN applies
to any person (including small or large
entities) who intends to engage in any
activity described in the rule as a
‘‘significant new use.’’ Because these
uses are ‘‘new,’’ based on all
information currently available to EPA,
it appears that no small or large entities
presently engage in such activities. A
SNUR requires that any person who
intends to engage in such activity in the
future must first notify EPA by
submitting a SNUN. Although some
small entities may decide to pursue a
significant new use in the future, EPA
cannot presently determine how many,
if any, there may be. However, EPA’s
experience to date is that, in response to
the promulgation of SNURs covering
over 1,000 chemicals, the Agency
receives only a handful of notices per
year. For example, the number of
SNUNs was four in Federal fiscal year
2005, eight in FY 2006, six in FY 2007,
eight in FY 2008, and seven in FY 2009.
During this five-year period, three small
entities submitted a SNUN. In addition,
the estimated reporting cost for
submission of a SNUN (see Unit VIII.)
is minimal regardless of the size of the
firm. Therefore, EPA believes that the
potential economic impacts of
complying with this modified SNUR is
not expected to be significant or
adversely impact a substantial number
of small entities. In a SNUR that
published in the Federal Register issue
of June 2, 1997 (62 FR 29684) (FRL–
5597–1), the Agency presented its
general determination that final SNURs
are not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, which was
provided to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Based on EPA’s experience with
proposing and finalizing SNURs, State,
local, and Tribal governments have not
been impacted by these rulemakings,
and EPA does not have any reasons to
believe that any State, local, or Tribal
government will be impacted by this
final rule. As such, EPA has determined
that this final rule does not impose any
enforceable duty, contain any unfunded
mandate, or otherwise have any affect
on small governments subject to the
requirements of sections 202, 203, 204,
or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4).
E. Executive Order 13132
This action will not have a substantial
direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This final rule does not have Tribal
implications because it is not expected
to have substantial direct effects on
Indian Tribes. This final rule does not
significantly nor uniquely affect the
communities of Indian Tribal
governments, nor does it involve or
impose any requirements that affect
Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this final rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order
12866, and this action does not address
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this action is not
expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this
action is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
E:\FR\FM\08FER1.SGM
08FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Rules and Regulations
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
In addition, since this action does not
involve any technical standards, section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note), does not
apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special
considerations of environmental justice
related issues as delineated by
Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994).
X. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 1, 2012.
Wendy C. Hamnett,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 721 is
amended as follows:
PART 721—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
2. Amend § 721.9719 as follows:
a. Revise paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)(i),
and (a)(2)(ii).
■ b. Remove paragraph (a)(2)(iii).
■ c. Revise paragraph (b)(1).
■ d. Remove paragraph (b)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
■
§ 721.9719
(generic).
Tris carbamoyl triazine
(a) * * *
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as tris carbamoyl triazine
(PMN P–95–1098) is subject to reporting
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:44 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
under this section for the significant
new uses described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section. The requirements of this
rule do not apply to quantities of the
chemical substance after it has been
completely reacted (cured).
(2) * * *
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in § 721.63
(a)(4), (a)(6)(v), (b) (concentration set at
1.0 percent), and (c). Respirators must
provide a National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) assigned protection factor
(APF) of at least 5. As an alternative to
the respiratory requirements listed, a
manufacturer, importer, or processor
may choose to follow the new chemical
exposure limit (NCEL) provisions listed
in the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) section 5(e) consent order for
this substance. The NCEL is 1.0 mg/m3
as an 8-hour time weighted average.
Persons who wish to pursue NCELs as
an alternative to the § 721.63 respirator
requirements may request to do so
under § 721.30. Persons whose § 721.30
requests to use the NCELs approach are
approved by EPA will receive NCELs
provisions comparable to those
contained in the corresponding section
5(e) consent order. The following
NIOSH-certified respirators meet the
requirements for § 721.63(a)(4):
(A) Air purifying, tight-fitting halfface respirator equipped with the
appropriate combination cartridges;
cartridges should be tested and
approved for the gas/vapor substance
(i.e., organic vapor, acid gas, or
substance-specific cartridge) and should
include a particulate filter (N100 if oil
aerosols are absent, R100, or P100);
(B) Air purifying, tight-fitting full-face
respirator equipped with the
appropriate combination cartridges;
cartridges should be tested and
approved for the gas/vapor substance
(i.e., organic vapor, acid gas, or
substance-specific cartridge) and should
include a particulate filter (N100 if oil
aerosols are absent, R100, or P100);
(C) Powered air-purifying respirator
equipped with loose-fitting hood or
helmet equipped with a High Efficiency
Particulate Air (HEPA) filter; powered
air-purifying respirator equipped with
tight-fitting facepiece (either half-face or
full-face) equipped with a HEPA filter;
(D) Supplied-air respirator operated in
pressure demand or continuous flow
mode and equipped with a hood or
helmet, or tight-fitting face piece (either
half-face or full-face).
(ii) Hazard communication program.
Requirements as specified in § 721.72
(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) (concentration set at
1.0 percent), (f), (g)(1)(ii), (g)(1)(iv),
(g)(1)(ix), (g)(2)(ii), (g)(2)(iv), and (g)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6479
(b) * * *
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in § 721.125
(a), (b), (c), (d), (f), (g), and (h) are
applicable to manufacturers, importers,
and processors of this substance.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2012–2909 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 76
[MB Docket No. 07–42; FCC 11–119]
Leased Commercial Access;
Development of Competition and
Diversity in Video Programming
Distribution and Carriage
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; announcement of
effective date.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission announces that the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved, for a period of three years, the
information collection associated with
the Commission’s rules contained in the
Second Report and Order, FCC 11–119,
pertaining to carriage of video
programming vendors by multichannel
video programming distributors
(program carriage rules). This notice is
consistent with the Secord Report and
Order, which stated that the
Commission would publish a document
in the Federal Register announcing the
effective date of those rules.
DATES: The amendments to 47 CFR
1.221(h), 1.229(b)(3), 1.229(b)(4),
1.248(a), 1.248(b), 76.7(g)(2),
76.1302(c)(1), 76.1302(d), 76.1302(e)(1),
and 76.1302(k) published at 76 FR
60652, September 29, 2011, are effective
on February 8, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918, or
email: Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document announces that, on January
30, 2012, OMB approved, for a period of
three years, the information collection
requirements relating to the program
carriage rules contained in the
Commission’s Second Report and Order,
FCC 11–119, published at 76 FR 60652,
September 29, 2011. The OMB Control
Number is 3060–0888. The Commission
publishes this notice as an
announcement of the effective date of
the rules. If you have any comments on
the burden estimates listed below, or
how the Commission can improve the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08FER1.SGM
08FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6476-6479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2909]
[[Page 6476]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0108; FRL-9330-6]
RIN 2070-AB27
Modification of Significant New Uses of Tris Carbamoyl Triazine
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing an amendment to the significant new use rule
(SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
for the chemical substance identified generically as tris carbamoyl
triazine, which was the subject to premanufacture notice (PMN) P-95-
1098. This action requires persons who intend to manufacture, import,
or process the chemical substance for a use that is designated as a
significant new use by this final rule to notify EPA at least 90 days
before commencing that activity. EPA believes that this action is
necessary because new uses of the chemical substance may be hazardous
to human health. The required notification would provide EPA with the
opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit
or limit that activity before it occurs.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 9, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0108. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPPT Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) at Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of operation
are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Tracey Klosterman, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-2209; email address: klosterman.tracey@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
import, process, or use the chemical substance identified generically
as tris carbamoyl triazine (PMN P-95-1098). Potentially affected
entities may include, but are not limited to:
Manufacturers, importers, or processors of the subject chemical
substance (NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g., chemical manufacturing
and petroleum refineries.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in Sec. 721.5. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
This action may also affect certain entities through pre-existing
import certification and export notification rules under TSCA. Chemical
importers are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C. 2612) import
certification requirements promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118 through 12.127
and 19 CFR 127.28. Chemical importers must certify that the shipment of
the chemical substance complies with all applicable rules and orders
under TSCA. Importers of chemicals subject to a SNUR must certify their
compliance with the SNUR requirements. The EPA policy in support of
import certification appears at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B. In
addition, any persons who export or intend to export the chemical
substance that is the subject of a proposed or final SNUR are subject
to the export notification provisions of TSCA section 12(b) (15 U.S.C.
2611(b)) (see Sec. 721.20), and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part 707, subpart D.
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
EPA is finalizing an amendment to the SNUR for the chemical
substance identified generically as tris carbamoyl triazine (PMN P-95-
1098) codified at 40 CFR 721.9719. This final action requires persons
who intend to manufacture, import, or process the chemical substance
for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by this
final rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that
activity.
This rule was proposed in the Federal Register issue of August 3,
2011 (76 FR 46678) (FRL-8878-3). EPA received no public comments in
response to the proposal. Therefore, the Agency is issuing a final
SNUR, as proposed that:
1. Identifies those forms of the PMN substance that are exempt from
the provisions of the SNUR. These exemptions apply to quantities of the
PMN substance after it has been completely reacted (cured).
2. Adds protection in the workplace requirements under Sec. 721.63
for respiratory protection and alternative New Chemical Exposure Limit
(NCEL) exposure monitoring to address the newly-identified potential
risks from inhalation exposure in the workplace.
3. Revises the hazard communication requirements under Sec. 721.72
to add the human health hazard and exposures and remove the
environmental hazards and exposures.
4. Removes all release to water requirements under Sec. 721.90.
5. Revises the recordkeeping requirements under Sec. 721.125 to
reflect the modified significant new uses.
B. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to
determine that a use of a chemical substance is a ``significant new
use.'' EPA must make this determination by rule after considering all
relevant factors,
[[Page 6477]]
including the four bulleted TSCA section 5(a)(2) factors, listed in
Unit IV. of this document. Once EPA determines that a use of a chemical
substance is a significant new use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) requires
persons to submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to EPA at least
90 days before they manufacture, import, or process the chemical
substance for that use. Persons who must report are described in Sec.
721.5.
III. Rationale for the Rule
During review of PMN P-95-1098, the chemical substance identified
generically as tris carbamoyl triazine, EPA concluded that regulation
was warranted under TSCA section 5(e), pending the development of
information sufficient to make reasoned evaluations of the health or
environmental effects of this chemical substance. The basis for such
findings is outlined in Unit II. of the proposed rule to amend this
SNUR, included in the Federal Register issue of August 3, 2011 (76 FR
46678) and in the Federal Register document of August 20, 1998 (63 FR
44562) (FRL-5788-7). Based on these findings, a TSCA section 5(e)
consent order requiring the use of appropriate exposure controls was
negotiated with the PMN submitter. The SNUR provisions for this
chemical substance were consistent with the provisions of the original
TSCA section 5(e) consent order. The SNUR was promulgated pursuant to
Sec. 721.160.
After the review of test data submitted pursuant to the TSCA
section 5(e) consent order for PMN P-95-1098 (see Unit II. of the
proposed rule) and consideration of the factors included in TSCA
section 5(a)(2) (see Unit IV. of this document), EPA determined that
the chemical substance may pose an unreasonable risk to human health,
but also that the finding that certain activities involving the
substance may present an unreasonable risk to the environment was no
longer supported. Consequently, EPA is finalizing this modification to
the SNUR at Sec. 721.9719 according to procedures in Sec. 721.160 and
Sec. 721.185, so that SNUR provisions for this chemical substance
remain consistent with the provisions of the TSCA section 5(e) consent
order, as modified.
IV. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that EPA's determination that a use
of a chemical substance is a significant new use must be made after
consideration of all relevant factors, including:
The projected volume of manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
The extent to which a use changes the type or form of
exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical substance.
The extent to which a use increases the magnitude and
duration of exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
The reasonably anticipated manner and methods of
manufacturing, processing, distribution in commerce, and disposal of a
chemical substance.
In addition to these factors enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2),
the statute authorizes EPA to consider any other relevant factors. To
determine what would constitute a significant new use for the chemical
substance identified generically as tris carbamoyl triazine (PMN P-95-
1098), EPA considered relevant information about the toxicity of the
chemical substance, likely human exposures and environmental releases
associated with possible uses, taking into consideration the four
bulleted TSCA section 5(a)(2) factors listed in this unit.
V. Applicability of Rule to Uses Occurring Before Effective Date of the
Final Rule
As discussed in the Federal Register issue of April 24, 1990 (55 FR
17376), EPA has decided that the intent of TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) is
best served by designating a use as a significant new use as of the
date of publication of the proposed SNUR rather than as of the
effective date of the final rule. If uses begun after publication were
considered ongoing rather than new, it would be difficult for EPA to
establish SNUR notice requirements, because a person could defeat the
SNUR by initiating the proposed significant new use before the rule
became effective, and then argue that the use was ongoing as of the
effective date of the final rule.
Any persons who began commercial manufacture, import, or processing
activities with the chemical substance identified generically as tris
carbamoyl triazine (PMN P-95-1098), for any of the significant new uses
designated in the proposed SNUR modification after the date of
publication of the proposed SNUR, must stop that activity before the
effective date of this final rule. Persons who ceased those activities
will have to meet all SNUR notice requirements and wait until the end
of the notice review period, including all extensions, before engaging
in any activities designated as significant new uses.
EPA has promulgated provisions to allow persons to comply with this
SNUR before the effective date. If a person were to meet the conditions
of advance compliance under Sec. [emsp14]721.45(h), the person would
be considered to have met the requirements of this final SNUR for those
activities.
VI. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5 does not require the development
of any particular test data before submission of a SNUN. There are two
exceptions:
1. Development of test data is required where the chemical
substance subject to the SNUR is also subject to a test rule under TSCA
section 4 (see TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be necessary where the chemical
substance has been listed under TSCA section 5(b)(4) (see TSCA section
5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4 test rule or a TSCA section
5(b)(4) listing covering the chemical substance, persons are required
only to submit test data in their possession or control and to describe
any other data known to or reasonably ascertainable by them (see Sec.
720.50). However, upon review of PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing. In this case, EPA recommends
persons, before performing any testing, to consult with the Agency
pertaining to protocol selection.
The recommended testing specified in Unit II.A. of the proposed
rule may not be the only means of addressing the potential risks of the
chemical substance. However, SNUNs submitted without any test data may
increase the likelihood that EPA will take action under TSCA section
5(e), particularly if satisfactory test results have not been obtained
from a prior PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA recommends that potential SNUN
submitters contact EPA early enough so that they will be able to
conduct the appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware that EPA will be better able to
evaluate SNUNs which provide detailed information on the following:
Human exposure and environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the chemical substances.
Potential benefits of the chemical substances.
Information on risks posed by the chemical substances
compared to risks posed by potential substitutes.
VII. SNUN Submissions
According to 40 CFR 721.1(c), persons submitting a SNUN must comply
with the same notice requirements and EPA regulatory procedures as
persons submitting a PMN, including
[[Page 6478]]
submission of test data on health and environmental effects as
described in Sec. 720.50. SNUNs must be on EPA Form No. 7710-25,
generated using e-PMN software, and submitted to the Agency in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. Sec. 721.25 and
720.40. E-PMN software is available electronically at https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems.
VIII. Economic Analysis
EPA evaluated the potential costs of establishing SNUN requirements
for potential manufacturers, importers, and processors of the chemical
substance during the development of the direct final rule. The Agency's
complete Economic Analysis is available in the docket under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0108.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This action modifies a SNUR for a chemical substance that is the
subject of a PMN and TSCA section 5(e) consent order. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., an Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information that requires OMB
approval under PRA, unless it has been approved by OMB and displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if applicable.
The information collection requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB pursuant to PRA under OMB control number
2070-0012 (EPA ICR No. 574). This action does not impose any burden
requiring additional OMB approval. If an entity were to submit a SNUN
to the Agency, the annual burden is estimated to average between 30 and
170 hours per response. This burden estimate includes the time needed
to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and
maintain the data needed, and complete, review, and submit the required
SNUN.
Send any comments about the accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including
through the use of automated collection techniques, to the Director,
Collection Strategies Division, Office of Environmental Information
(2822T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. Please remember to include the OMB control
number in any correspondence, but do not submit any completed forms to
this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby certifies that promulgation
of this modified SNUR will not have a significant adverse economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The rationale
supporting this conclusion is discussed in this unit. The requirement
to submit a SNUN applies to any person (including small or large
entities) who intends to engage in any activity described in the rule
as a ``significant new use.'' Because these uses are ``new,'' based on
all information currently available to EPA, it appears that no small or
large entities presently engage in such activities. A SNUR requires
that any person who intends to engage in such activity in the future
must first notify EPA by submitting a SNUN. Although some small
entities may decide to pursue a significant new use in the future, EPA
cannot presently determine how many, if any, there may be. However,
EPA's experience to date is that, in response to the promulgation of
SNURs covering over 1,000 chemicals, the Agency receives only a handful
of notices per year. For example, the number of SNUNs was four in
Federal fiscal year 2005, eight in FY 2006, six in FY 2007, eight in FY
2008, and seven in FY 2009. During this five-year period, three small
entities submitted a SNUN. In addition, the estimated reporting cost
for submission of a SNUN (see Unit VIII.) is minimal regardless of the
size of the firm. Therefore, EPA believes that the potential economic
impacts of complying with this modified SNUR is not expected to be
significant or adversely impact a substantial number of small entities.
In a SNUR that published in the Federal Register issue of June 2, 1997
(62 FR 29684) (FRL-5597-1), the Agency presented its general
determination that final SNURs are not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, which was
provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Based on EPA's experience with proposing and finalizing SNURs,
State, local, and Tribal governments have not been impacted by these
rulemakings, and EPA does not have any reasons to believe that any
State, local, or Tribal government will be impacted by this final rule.
As such, EPA has determined that this final rule does not impose any
enforceable duty, contain any unfunded mandate, or otherwise have any
affect on small governments subject to the requirements of sections
202, 203, 204, or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4).
E. Executive Order 13132
This action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This final rule does not have Tribal implications because it is not
expected to have substantial direct effects on Indian Tribes. This
final rule does not significantly nor uniquely affect the communities
of Indian Tribal governments, nor does it involve or impose any
requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the requirements
of Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this final rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this is not an economically
significant regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866, and
this action does not address environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because this action
is not expected to affect energy supply, distribution, or use and
because this action is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
[[Page 6479]]
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
In addition, since this action does not involve any technical
standards, section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15
U.S.C. 272 note), does not apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special considerations of environmental
justice related issues as delineated by Executive Order 12898, entitled
Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
X. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 1, 2012.
Wendy C. Hamnett,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 721 is amended as follows:
PART 721--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
0
2. Amend Sec. 721.9719 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)(i), and (a)(2)(ii).
0
b. Remove paragraph (a)(2)(iii).
0
c. Revise paragraph (b)(1).
0
d. Remove paragraph (b)(3).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 721.9719 Tris carbamoyl triazine (generic).
(a) * * *
(1) The chemical substance identified generically as tris carbamoyl
triazine (PMN P-95-1098) is subject to reporting under this section for
the significant new uses described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
The requirements of this rule do not apply to quantities of the
chemical substance after it has been completely reacted (cured).
(2) * * *
(i) Protection in the workplace. Requirements as specified in Sec.
721.63 (a)(4), (a)(6)(v), (b) (concentration set at 1.0 percent), and
(c). Respirators must provide a National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) assigned protection factor (APF) of at least
5. As an alternative to the respiratory requirements listed, a
manufacturer, importer, or processor may choose to follow the new
chemical exposure limit (NCEL) provisions listed in the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 5(e) consent order for this
substance. The NCEL is 1.0 mg/m\3\ as an 8-hour time weighted average.
Persons who wish to pursue NCELs as an alternative to the Sec. 721.63
respirator requirements may request to do so under Sec. 721.30.
Persons whose Sec. 721.30 requests to use the NCELs approach are
approved by EPA will receive NCELs provisions comparable to those
contained in the corresponding section 5(e) consent order. The
following NIOSH-certified respirators meet the requirements for Sec.
721.63(a)(4):
(A) Air purifying, tight-fitting half-face respirator equipped with
the appropriate combination cartridges; cartridges should be tested and
approved for the gas/vapor substance (i.e., organic vapor, acid gas, or
substance-specific cartridge) and should include a particulate filter
(N100 if oil aerosols are absent, R100, or P100);
(B) Air purifying, tight-fitting full-face respirator equipped with
the appropriate combination cartridges; cartridges should be tested and
approved for the gas/vapor substance (i.e., organic vapor, acid gas, or
substance-specific cartridge) and should include a particulate filter
(N100 if oil aerosols are absent, R100, or P100);
(C) Powered air-purifying respirator equipped with loose-fitting
hood or helmet equipped with a High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA)
filter; powered air-purifying respirator equipped with tight-fitting
facepiece (either half-face or full-face) equipped with a HEPA filter;
(D) Supplied-air respirator operated in pressure demand or
continuous flow mode and equipped with a hood or helmet, or tight-
fitting face piece (either half-face or full-face).
(ii) Hazard communication program. Requirements as specified in
Sec. 721.72 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) (concentration set at 1.0
percent), (f), (g)(1)(ii), (g)(1)(iv), (g)(1)(ix), (g)(2)(ii),
(g)(2)(iv), and (g)(5).
(b) * * *
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125 (a), (b), (c), (d), (f), (g), and (h) are applicable to
manufacturers, importers, and processors of this substance.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-2909 Filed 2-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P