In the Matter of Edward G. Johnson; Confirmatory Order (Effective Immediately), 6595-6598 [2012-2863]
Download as PDF
6595
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Notices
STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO SCORECARDS—Continued
[In millions of dollars; negative amounts portray decreases in deficits]
2011
Total, five-year scorecard .............................
Ten-year PAYGO Scorecard
Current Congressional session ....................................
Balances from prior session
Total, ten-year scorecard
2012
2013
2014
2015
¥9,155
¥9,155
¥9,155
¥9,155
¥9,155
¥710
¥6,371
¥710
¥6,371
¥710
¥6,371
¥710
¥6,371
¥7,081
¥7,081
¥7,081
¥7,081
The total net budgetary effects of all
PAYGO legislation enacted during the
first session of the 112th Congress are
shown on the line labeled ‘‘net PAYGO
impact’’ in the above table. The total
five-year net impact was a cost of $9,399
million which is averaged over the years
2012 to 2016 on the 5-year PAYGO
scorecard, resulting in a cost of $1,880
million in each year. Savings carried
over from the prior session of the
Congress more than offset these costs,
resulting in a savings of $9,155 million
each year in 2012 through 2015. The
five-year PAYGO window extended
only through 2015 in the last session of
the prior Congress so, there were no
five-year savings to carry over into 2016.
The total 10-year net impact of
legislation enacted during the first
session of the 112th Congress was a
savings of $7,099 million. The 10-year
PAYGO scorecard shows the total net
impact averaged over the 10-year
period, resulting in $710 million in
savings every year. Balances from the
prior session increase the savings in
years 2012 through 2020 to $7,081
million.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
V. Sequestration Order
As shown on the scorecards, the
budgetary effects of PAYGO legislation
enacted in the first session of the 112th
Congress, combined with the balances
left on the scorecard from the previous
session of Congress, resulted in net
savings on both the 5-year and the 10year scorecard in the budget year, which
is 2012 for the purposes of this Report.
Because the costs for the budget year, as
shown on the scorecards, do not exceed
savings for the budget year, there is no
‘‘debit’’ on either scorecard under
section 3 of the PAYGO Act, 2 U.S.C.
932, and there is no need for a
sequestration order.
The savings shown on the scorecards
for 2012 will be removed from the
scorecards that are used to record the
budgetary effects of PAYGO legislation
enacted in the second session of the
112th Congress. The totals shown in
2013 through 2021 will remain on the
scorecards and will be used in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
1,880
................
................
................
................
................
¥710
¥6,371
¥710
¥6,371
¥710
¥6,371
¥710
¥6,371
¥710
¥6,371
¥710
¥6,371
¥710
0
¥7,081
¥7,081
¥7,081
¥7,081
¥7,081
¥7,081
¥710
determining whether a sequestration
order will be necessary at the end of
future sessions of the Congress.
[FR Doc. 2012–1871 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2012–0033; Docket No. 55–33166;
License No. OP–31438; IA–11–061]
BILLING CODE P
In the Matter of Edward G. Johnson;
Confirmatory Order (Effective
Immediately)
NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT
CORPORATION
Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting; Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors
11:30 a.m., Thursday,
February 9, 2012.
TIME AND DATE:
1325 G Street NW., Suite 800,
Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Open.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate Secretary
(202) 220–2376; ehall@nw.org.
AGENDA:
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. External Auditor’s Presentation
III. Executive Session with External
Auditors
IV. Executive Session with Internal
Audit Director
V. Executive Session Related to Pending
Litigation
VI. Internal Audit Report with
Management’s Response
VII. Internal Audit Status Reports
VIII. National Foreclosure Mitigation
Counseling (NFMC)/Emergency
Homeowners Loan Program (EHLP)
Update
IX. OHTS Watch List
X. Adjournment
Erica Hall,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–3064 Filed 2–6–12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I
Mr. Edward G. Johnson is the holder
of Reactor Operator License No. OP–
31438 issued by the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC or
Commission) pursuant to the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as
amended (Public Law 93–438), effective
July 18, 2008. The license authorizes
Mr. Johnson to manipulate the controls
of the Palisades Nuclear Plant, Facility
License No. DPR–20.
This Confirmatory Order is the result
of an agreement reached during an
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
mediation session conducted on
December 20, 2011.
II
On December 7, 2010, the NRC Office
of Investigations (OI) initiated an
investigation (OI Case No. 3–2011–003)
associated with Mr. Johnson’s apparent
violation of procedure requirements as
an at-the-controls reactor operator at the
Palisades Nuclear Plant, by removing
himself from his watch standing
responsibilities without proper turnover
and approval from the Control Room
Supervisor on October 23, 2010. Entergy
Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) is the
facility licensee for the Palisades
Nuclear Plant.
Based on the results of the OI
investigation, the NRC identified one
apparent violation. The apparent
violation involved Mr. Johnson, as an atthe-controls reactor operator, leaving the
at-the-controls area of the Control Room
without providing a turnover to a
qualified individual and obtaining
permission from the Control Room
Supervisor. Mr. Johnson’s actions were
contrary to Palisades Technical
Specification 5.4.1.a, as implemented
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
6596
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
through Entergy Nuclear Management
Manual EN–OP–115, Revision 9,
‘‘Conduct of Operations.’’ Specifically,
EN–OP–115, Section 4.13.b, requires
that the reactor operator at-the-controls
is to remain in the at-the-controls area
of the Control Room except as necessary
to transition from one at-the-controls
area to another. Section 5.11 requires
that in the case where a Control Room
operator needs to be relieved during
their shift, permission must be granted
by the Shift Manager or Control Room
Supervisor, as applicable, and a verbal
turnover is conducted to a qualified
individual.
On December 20, 2011, the NRC and
Mr. Johnson met in an ADR session
mediated by a professional mediator,
arranged through Cornell University’s
Institute on Conflict Resolution.
Alternative Dispute Resolution is a
process in which a neutral mediator
with no decision-making authority
assists the parties in reaching an
agreement on resolving any differences
regarding the dispute. This
Confirmatory Order is issued pursuant
to the agreement reached during the
ADR process.
III
In response to the NRC’s offer, Mr.
Johnson requested use of the NRC’s
ADR process to resolve differences he
had with the NRC. During an ADR
session on December 20, 2011, a
preliminary settlement agreement was
reached. The elements of the agreement
consisted of the following:
1. Prior to resumption of licensed
duties, Mr. Johnson agreed to participate
in the Entergy Remediation Plan
developed for Mr. Johnson as a licensed
operator at Palisades. Significant
components of this Remediation Plan
require that Mr. Johnson:
(a) Research and provide
presentations to senior Palisades
leadership and Operations personnel on
the event and the associated duties and
responsibilities of a licensed reactor
operator;
(b) Participate in interviews with
senior Entergy management to assess his
eligibility and readiness to resume
licensed duties;
(c) Complete at least 40 hours of
‘‘Under Instruction’’ watch on each shift
as a licensed reactor operator and
receive a favorable recommendation
from each Shift Manager; and,
(d) Participate in a simulator scenario
and associated training that include
handling stressful situations and
conflict management.
Mr. Johnson agreed to notify the NRC
Region III Enforcement/Investigations
Officer in writing within 14 days of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
either the successful completion of the
Remediation Plan or the termination of
the plan by either Mr. Johnson or
Entergy.
2. Mr. Johnson recognizes an
opportunity for licensed operators at
other nuclear facilities to learn from his
violation. Mr. Johnson agreed to convey
his personal lessons learned from this
event by authoring and submitting an
article to the Communicator (the
publication of the Professional Reactor
Operator Society) requesting publication
therein. Mr. Johnson agreed that the
article will contain a description of the
events of October 22–23, 2010; his
personal lessons learned from the event,
including his understanding of the
importance of teamwork; the safety and
legal responsibilities of a licensed
reactor operator and the responsibilities
to public safety; the corrective actions
taken by Mr. Johnson; and Mr. Johnson’s
interactions with the NRC resulting
from the violation. Mr. Johnson agreed
to submit the draft article to the NRC
Region III Enforcement/Investigations
Officer within 30 days of the issuance
of the Confirmatory Order and agreed to
submit the final article to the
Professional Reactor Operator Society
for possible publication, after providing
15 days for NRC comment, and no later
than 60 days of the date of the
Confirmatory Order. Within 7 days of
Mr. Johnson’s submission to the
Professional Reactor Operator Society,
Mr. Johnson agreed to provide a copy of
that submission to the NRC Region III
Enforcement/Investigations Officer.
3. The NRC agreed not to pursue any
further enforcement action in
connection with the NRC’s October 28,
2011, letter to Mr. Johnson. This does
not prohibit NRC from taking
enforcement action in accordance with
the NRC Enforcement Policy, if Mr.
Johnson commits a similar violation in
the future or violates the Order.
On January 17, 2012, Mr. Johnson
consented to issuing this Confirmatory
Order with the commitments, as
described in Section V below. Mr.
Johnson further agreed that this
Confirmatory Order is to be effective
upon issuance and that Mr. Johnson has
waived his right to a hearing.
IV
Since Mr. Johnson has agreed to take
additional actions to address NRC
concerns, as set forth in Section III
above, the NRC has concluded that its
concerns can be resolved through
issuance of this Confirmatory Order.
We find that Mr. Johnson’s
commitments as set forth in Section V
are acceptable and necessary and
conclude that with these commitments
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the public health and safety are
reasonably assured. In view of the
foregoing, we have determined that
public health and safety require that Mr.
Johnson’s commitments be confirmed
by this Confirmatory Order. Based on
the above and Mr. Johnson’s consent,
this Confirmatory Order is immediately
effective upon issuance.
V
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 81,
161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
and the Commission’s regulations in 10
CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR part 55, it is
hereby ordered, effective immediately,
that:
1. Prior to resumption of licensed
duties, Mr. Johnson shall participate in
the Entergy Remediation Plan
developed for Mr. Johnson as a licensed
operator at Palisades Nuclear Plant.
Significant components of this
Remediation Plan require that Mr.
Johnson shall:
(a) Research and provide
presentations to senior Palisades
leadership and Operations personnel on
the event and the associated duties and
responsibilities of a licensed reactor
operator;
(b) Participate in interviews with
senior Entergy management to assess his
eligibility and readiness to resume
licensed duties;
(c) Complete at least 40 hours of
‘‘Under Instruction’’ watch on each shift
as a licensed reactor operator and
receive a favorable recommendation
from each Shift Manager; and,
(d) Participate in a simulator scenario
and associated training that include
handling stressful situations and
conflict management.
Mr. Johnson shall notify the NRC
Region III Enforcement/Investigations
Officer in writing within 14 days of
either the successful completion of the
Remediation Plan or the termination of
the plan by either Mr. Johnson or
Entergy.
2. Mr. Johnson shall convey his
personal lessons learned from this event
by authoring and submitting an article
to the Communicator (the publication of
the Professional Reactor Operator
Society) requesting publication therein.
Mr. Johnson agreed that the article will
contain a description of the events of
October 22–23, 2010; his personal
lessons learned from the event,
including his understanding of the
importance of teamwork; the safety and
legal responsibilities of a licensed
reactor operator and the responsibilities
to public safety; the corrective actions
taken by Mr. Johnson; and Mr. Johnson’s
interactions with the NRC resulting
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
from the violation. Mr. Johnson shall
submit the draft article to the NRC
Region III Enforcement/Investigations
Officer within 30 days of the issuance
of the confirmatory order and shall
submit the final article to the
Professional Reactor Operator Society
for possible publication, after providing
15 days for NRC comment, and no later
than 60 days of the date of the
confirmatory order. Within 7 days of
Mr. Johnson’s submission to the
Professional Reactor Operator Society,
Mr. Johnson shall provide a copy of that
submission to the NRC Region III
Enforcement/Investigations Officer.
The Regional Administrator, Region
III, NRC, may, in writing, relax or
rescind any of the above conditions
upon demonstration by Mr. Johnson of
good cause.
VI
Any person adversely affected by this
Confirmatory Order, other than Mr.
Johnson, may request a hearing within
20 days of its publication in the Federal
Register. Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending
the time to request a hearing. A request
for extension of time must be made in
writing to the Director, Office of
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555,
and include a statement of good cause
for the extension.
All documents filed in the NRC’s
adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave
to intervene, any motion or other
document filed in the proceeding prior
to the submission of a request for
hearing or petition to intervene, and
documents filed by interested
governmental entities participating
under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in
accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule
(72 FR 49139, August 28, 2007). The EFiling process requires participants to
submit and serve all adjudicatory
documents over the internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic
storage media. Participants may not
submit paper copies of their filings
unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures
described below.
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the
participant should contact the Office of
the Secretary by email at
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone
at (301) 415–1677, to request: (1) a
digital identification (ID) certificate,
which allows the participant (or its
counsel or representative) to digitally
sign documents and access the ESubmittal server for any proceeding in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
which it is participating; and (2) advise
the Secretary that the participant will be
submitting a request or petition for
hearing (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or
representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon
this information, the Secretary will
establish an electronic docket for the
hearing in this proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an
electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on the
NRC’s public Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/
apply-certificates.html. System
requirements for accessing the ESubmittal server are detailed in the
NRC’s ‘‘Guidance for Electronic
Submission,’’ which is available on the
agency’s public Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. Participants may
attempt to use other software not listed
on the Web site, but should note that the
NRC’s E-Filing system does not support
unlisted software, and the NRC Meta
System Help Desk will not be able to
offer assistance in using unlisted
software.
If a participant is electronically
submitting a document to the NRC in
accordance with the E-Filing rule, the
participant must file the document
using the NRC’s online, Web-based
submission form. In order to serve
documents through the Electronic
Information Exchange System, users
will be required to install a Web
browser plug-in from the NRC’s Web
site. Further information on the Webbased submission form, including the
installation of the Web browser plug-in,
is available on the NRC’s public Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a
digital ID certificate and a docket has
been created, the participant can then
submit a request for hearing or petition
for leave to intervene. Submissions
should be in Portable Document Format
(PDF) in accordance with the NRC
guidance available on the NRC public
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/sitehelp/e-submittals.html. A filing is
considered complete at the time the
documents are submitted through the
NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an
electronic filing must be submitted to
the E-Filing system no later than 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time on the due date.
Upon receipt of a transmission, the EFiling system time-stamps the document
and sends the submitter an email notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email
notice that provides access to the
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6597
document to the NRC’s Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the documents on those
participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before a hearing request/
petition to intervene is filed so that they
can obtain access to the document via
the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using
the agency’s adjudicatory E-Filing
system may seek assistance by
contacting the NRC Meta System Help
Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link
located on the NRC’s Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–(866) 672–7640. The NRC
Meta System Help Desk is available
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing requesting authorization to
continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted
by: (1) first class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery
service to the Office of the Secretary,
Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, Attention: Rulemaking
and Adjudications Staff. Participants
filing a document in this manner are
responsible for serving the document on
all other participants. Filing is
considered complete by first-class mail
as of the time of deposit in the mail, or
by courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service upon depositing the
document with the provider of the
service. A presiding officer, having
granted an exemption request from
using E-Filing, may require a participant
or party to use E-Filing if the presiding
officer subsequently determines that the
reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the Commission,
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
6598
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 8, 2012 / Notices
or the presiding officer. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
home phone numbers in their filings,
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited
excerpts that serve the purpose of the
adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application,
participants are requested not to include
copyrighted materials in their
submission.
If a person (other than Mr. Johnson)
requests a hearing, that person shall set
forth with particularity the manner in
which his interest is adversely affected
by this Confirmatory Order and shall
address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR
2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person
whose interest is adversely affected, the
Commission will issue an order
designating the time and place of any
hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to
be considered at such hearing shall be
whether this Confirmatory Order should
be sustained.
In the absence of any request for
hearing, or written approval of an
extension of time in which to request a
hearing, the provisions specified in
Section V above shall be final 20 days
from the date this Confirmatory Order is
published in the Federal Register
without further order or proceedings. If
an extension of time for requesting a
hearing has been approved, the
provisions specified in Section V shall
be final when the extension expires if a
hearing request has not been received.
A request for hearing shall not stay
the immediate effectiveness of this
order.
Dated this 25th day of January 2012.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Cynthia D. Pederson,
Acting Regional Administrator, NRC Region
III.
[FR Doc. 2012–2863 Filed 2–7–12; 8:45 am]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:54 Feb 07, 2012
Jkt 226001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2012–0032; Docket No. 50–255,
License No. DPR–20; EA–11–214]
In the Matter of Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc., Palisades Nuclear
Plant, 27780 Blue Star Memorial
Highway, Covert, MI 49043–9530;
Confirmatory Order (Effective
Immediately)
I
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(Licensee or Entergy) is the holder of
Reactor Operating License No. DPR–20
issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission)
pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 50 on
March 24, 1971. The license authorizes
the operation of the Palisades Nuclear
Plant in accordance with conditions
specified therein.
This Confirmatory Order is the result
of an agreement reached during an
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
mediation session conducted on
December 12, 2011.
II
On December 7, 2010, the NRC Office
of Investigations (OI) initiated
investigation (OI Case No. 3–2011–003)
associated with an at-the-controls
reactor operator at the Palisades Nuclear
Plant who apparently violated
procedure requirements by removing
himself from his watch standing
responsibilities without proper turnover
and approval from the Control Room
Supervisor on October 23, 2010.
Based on the results of the OI
investigation, the NRC identified one
apparent violation. The apparent
violation involved the at-the-controls
reactor operator leaving the at-thecontrols area of the Control Room
without providing a turnover to a
qualified individual and obtaining
permission from the Control Room
Supervisor. The individual’s actions
were contrary to Palisades Technical
Specification 5.4.1.a, as implemented
through Entergy Nuclear Management
Manual EN–OP–115, Revision 9,
‘‘Conduct of Operations.’’ Specifically,
EN–OP–115, Section 4.13.b, requires
that the reactor operator at-the-controls
is to remain in the at-the-controls area
of the Control Room, except as
necessary to transition from one at-thecontrols area to another. Section 5.11
requires that in the case where a Control
Room operator needs to be relieved
during their shift, permission must be
granted by the Shift Manager or Control
Room Supervisor, as applicable, and a
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
verbal turnover is conducted to a
qualified individual.
On December 12, 2011, the NRC and
Entergy met in an ADR session
mediated by a professional mediator,
arranged through Cornell University’s
Institute on Conflict Resolution.
Alternative Dispute Resolution is a
process in which a neutral mediator
with no decision-making authority
assists the parties in reaching an
agreement on resolving any differences
regarding the dispute. This
Confirmatory Order is issued pursuant
to the agreement reached during the
ADR process.
III
In response to the NRC’s offer,
Entergy requested use of the NRC’s ADR
process to resolve differences it had
with the NRC. During an ADR session
on December 12, 2011, a preliminary
settlement agreement was reached. The
elements of the agreement consisted of
the following:
1. Entergy stated that it already
completed, prior to the ADR session,
certain corrective actions that address
issues underlying the apparent
violation. These actions included:
(a) Operations management
conducted a briefing for Palisades
Operations personnel to communicate
the importance of the at-the-controls
turnover process and the timely
notification of events;
(b) Management conducted a
comprehensive assessment during the
week of November 5, 2010, to assess the
Palisades Operations Department’s
adherence to Entergy’s Conduct of
Operations procedure;
(c) Entergy conducted training
sessions for Palisades Shift Managers on
the role of the Shift Manager in plant
operations and in conflict resolution;
(d) Entergy reaffirmed to Palisades
Operations Department personnel the
importance of raising issues to senior
management;
(e) Entergy developed and presented
to all licensed operators at Palisades a
case study based on the event. The case
study discussed methods for
identifying, addressing, and resolving
conflicts between Control Room staff;
(f) Entergy conducted training
sessions for Shift Managers at Palisades
to enhance their knowledge and
performance under the Behavioral
Observation Program;
(g) The Control Room Supervisor onshift during the event participated in a
conflict management program;
(h) Senior Palisades management
developed and presented to each
licensed operator requalification class, a
case study, which focused on the
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6595-6598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2863]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2012-0033; Docket No. 55-33166; License No. OP-31438; IA-11-061]
In the Matter of Edward G. Johnson; Confirmatory Order (Effective
Immediately)
I
Mr. Edward G. Johnson is the holder of Reactor Operator License No.
OP-31438 issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or
Commission) pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (Public Law 93-438),
effective July 18, 2008. The license authorizes Mr. Johnson to
manipulate the controls of the Palisades Nuclear Plant, Facility
License No. DPR-20.
This Confirmatory Order is the result of an agreement reached
during an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mediation session
conducted on December 20, 2011.
II
On December 7, 2010, the NRC Office of Investigations (OI)
initiated an investigation (OI Case No. 3-2011-003) associated with Mr.
Johnson's apparent violation of procedure requirements as an at-the-
controls reactor operator at the Palisades Nuclear Plant, by removing
himself from his watch standing responsibilities without proper
turnover and approval from the Control Room Supervisor on October 23,
2010. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) is the facility
licensee for the Palisades Nuclear Plant.
Based on the results of the OI investigation, the NRC identified
one apparent violation. The apparent violation involved Mr. Johnson, as
an at-the-controls reactor operator, leaving the at-the-controls area
of the Control Room without providing a turnover to a qualified
individual and obtaining permission from the Control Room Supervisor.
Mr. Johnson's actions were contrary to Palisades Technical
Specification 5.4.1.a, as implemented
[[Page 6596]]
through Entergy Nuclear Management Manual EN-OP-115, Revision 9,
``Conduct of Operations.'' Specifically, EN-OP-115, Section 4.13.b,
requires that the reactor operator at-the-controls is to remain in the
at-the-controls area of the Control Room except as necessary to
transition from one at-the-controls area to another. Section 5.11
requires that in the case where a Control Room operator needs to be
relieved during their shift, permission must be granted by the Shift
Manager or Control Room Supervisor, as applicable, and a verbal
turnover is conducted to a qualified individual.
On December 20, 2011, the NRC and Mr. Johnson met in an ADR session
mediated by a professional mediator, arranged through Cornell
University's Institute on Conflict Resolution. Alternative Dispute
Resolution is a process in which a neutral mediator with no decision-
making authority assists the parties in reaching an agreement on
resolving any differences regarding the dispute. This Confirmatory
Order is issued pursuant to the agreement reached during the ADR
process.
III
In response to the NRC's offer, Mr. Johnson requested use of the
NRC's ADR process to resolve differences he had with the NRC. During an
ADR session on December 20, 2011, a preliminary settlement agreement
was reached. The elements of the agreement consisted of the following:
1. Prior to resumption of licensed duties, Mr. Johnson agreed to
participate in the Entergy Remediation Plan developed for Mr. Johnson
as a licensed operator at Palisades. Significant components of this
Remediation Plan require that Mr. Johnson:
(a) Research and provide presentations to senior Palisades
leadership and Operations personnel on the event and the associated
duties and responsibilities of a licensed reactor operator;
(b) Participate in interviews with senior Entergy management to
assess his eligibility and readiness to resume licensed duties;
(c) Complete at least 40 hours of ``Under Instruction'' watch on
each shift as a licensed reactor operator and receive a favorable
recommendation from each Shift Manager; and,
(d) Participate in a simulator scenario and associated training
that include handling stressful situations and conflict management.
Mr. Johnson agreed to notify the NRC Region III Enforcement/
Investigations Officer in writing within 14 days of either the
successful completion of the Remediation Plan or the termination of the
plan by either Mr. Johnson or Entergy.
2. Mr. Johnson recognizes an opportunity for licensed operators at
other nuclear facilities to learn from his violation. Mr. Johnson
agreed to convey his personal lessons learned from this event by
authoring and submitting an article to the Communicator (the
publication of the Professional Reactor Operator Society) requesting
publication therein. Mr. Johnson agreed that the article will contain a
description of the events of October 22-23, 2010; his personal lessons
learned from the event, including his understanding of the importance
of teamwork; the safety and legal responsibilities of a licensed
reactor operator and the responsibilities to public safety; the
corrective actions taken by Mr. Johnson; and Mr. Johnson's interactions
with the NRC resulting from the violation. Mr. Johnson agreed to submit
the draft article to the NRC Region III Enforcement/Investigations
Officer within 30 days of the issuance of the Confirmatory Order and
agreed to submit the final article to the Professional Reactor Operator
Society for possible publication, after providing 15 days for NRC
comment, and no later than 60 days of the date of the Confirmatory
Order. Within 7 days of Mr. Johnson's submission to the Professional
Reactor Operator Society, Mr. Johnson agreed to provide a copy of that
submission to the NRC Region III Enforcement/Investigations Officer.
3. The NRC agreed not to pursue any further enforcement action in
connection with the NRC's October 28, 2011, letter to Mr. Johnson. This
does not prohibit NRC from taking enforcement action in accordance with
the NRC Enforcement Policy, if Mr. Johnson commits a similar violation
in the future or violates the Order.
On January 17, 2012, Mr. Johnson consented to issuing this
Confirmatory Order with the commitments, as described in Section V
below. Mr. Johnson further agreed that this Confirmatory Order is to be
effective upon issuance and that Mr. Johnson has waived his right to a
hearing.
IV
Since Mr. Johnson has agreed to take additional actions to address
NRC concerns, as set forth in Section III above, the NRC has concluded
that its concerns can be resolved through issuance of this Confirmatory
Order.
We find that Mr. Johnson's commitments as set forth in Section V
are acceptable and necessary and conclude that with these commitments
the public health and safety are reasonably assured. In view of the
foregoing, we have determined that public health and safety require
that Mr. Johnson's commitments be confirmed by this Confirmatory Order.
Based on the above and Mr. Johnson's consent, this Confirmatory Order
is immediately effective upon issuance.
V
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR part 55, it is hereby ordered,
effective immediately, that:
1. Prior to resumption of licensed duties, Mr. Johnson shall
participate in the Entergy Remediation Plan developed for Mr. Johnson
as a licensed operator at Palisades Nuclear Plant. Significant
components of this Remediation Plan require that Mr. Johnson shall:
(a) Research and provide presentations to senior Palisades
leadership and Operations personnel on the event and the associated
duties and responsibilities of a licensed reactor operator;
(b) Participate in interviews with senior Entergy management to
assess his eligibility and readiness to resume licensed duties;
(c) Complete at least 40 hours of ``Under Instruction'' watch on
each shift as a licensed reactor operator and receive a favorable
recommendation from each Shift Manager; and,
(d) Participate in a simulator scenario and associated training
that include handling stressful situations and conflict management.
Mr. Johnson shall notify the NRC Region III Enforcement/
Investigations Officer in writing within 14 days of either the
successful completion of the Remediation Plan or the termination of the
plan by either Mr. Johnson or Entergy.
2. Mr. Johnson shall convey his personal lessons learned from this
event by authoring and submitting an article to the Communicator (the
publication of the Professional Reactor Operator Society) requesting
publication therein. Mr. Johnson agreed that the article will contain a
description of the events of October 22-23, 2010; his personal lessons
learned from the event, including his understanding of the importance
of teamwork; the safety and legal responsibilities of a licensed
reactor operator and the responsibilities to public safety; the
corrective actions taken by Mr. Johnson; and Mr. Johnson's interactions
with the NRC resulting
[[Page 6597]]
from the violation. Mr. Johnson shall submit the draft article to the
NRC Region III Enforcement/Investigations Officer within 30 days of the
issuance of the confirmatory order and shall submit the final article
to the Professional Reactor Operator Society for possible publication,
after providing 15 days for NRC comment, and no later than 60 days of
the date of the confirmatory order. Within 7 days of Mr. Johnson's
submission to the Professional Reactor Operator Society, Mr. Johnson
shall provide a copy of that submission to the NRC Region III
Enforcement/Investigations Officer.
The Regional Administrator, Region III, NRC, may, in writing, relax
or rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by Mr.
Johnson of good cause.
VI
Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other
than Mr. Johnson, may request a hearing within 20 days of its
publication in the Federal Register. Where good cause is shown,
consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing.
A request for extension of time must be made in writing to the
Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555, and include a statement of good cause for the
extension.
All documents filed in the NRC's adjudicatory proceedings,
including a request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any
motion or other document filed in the proceeding prior to the
submission of a request for hearing or petition to intervene, and
documents filed by interested governmental entities participating under
10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule
(72 FR 49139, August 28, 2007). The E-Filing process requires
participants to submit and serve all adjudicatory documents over the
internet, or in some cases to mail copies on electronic storage media.
Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they
seek an exemption in accordance with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the
Office of the Secretary by email at hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by
telephone at (301) 415-1677, to request: (1) a digital identification
(ID) certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise
the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a request or
petition for hearing (even in instances in which the participant, or
its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-issued digital ID
certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish
an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/apply-certificates.html. System requirements for accessing
the E-Submittal server are detailed in the NRC's ``Guidance for
Electronic Submission,'' which is available on the agency's public Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants
may attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but
should note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted
software, and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer
assistance in using unlisted software.
If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the
document using the NRC's online, Web-based submission form. In order to
serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange System,
users will be required to install a Web browser plug-in from the NRC's
Web site. Further information on the Web-based submission form,
including the installation of the Web browser plug-in, is available on
the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for
hearing or petition for leave to intervene. Submissions should be in
Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with the NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the
documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access
to the document to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any
others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the
documents on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for
and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/petition
to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document
via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the agency's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC's Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at 1-(866) 672-7640. The
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) first class mail
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Participants
filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by
first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing the
document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having
granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer
subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at
https://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the
Commission,
[[Page 6598]]
or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to include
personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home
addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC
regulation or other law requires submission of such information. With
respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve
the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted
materials in their submission.
If a person (other than Mr. Johnson) requests a hearing, that
person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his
interest is adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order and shall
address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely
affected, the Commission will issue an order designating the time and
place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered
at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be
sustained.
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of
an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions
specified in Section V above shall be final 20 days from the date this
Confirmatory Order is published in the Federal Register without further
order or proceedings. If an extension of time for requesting a hearing
has been approved, the provisions specified in Section V shall be final
when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received.
A request for hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of
this order.
Dated this 25th day of January 2012.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cynthia D. Pederson,
Acting Regional Administrator, NRC Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012-2863 Filed 2-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P